Charge-state dynamics of barium ions in high-pressure xenon and its implications for Barium-Tagging in $0\nu\beta\beta$ searches

A. Peralta Conde

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 35 references

Charge-state dynamics of barium ions in high-pressure xenon and its implications for Barium-Tagging in $0\nu\beta\beta$ searches

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A barium daughter from xenon-136 decay can recombine to Ba+ on a 0.25--2.5 ms timescale under NEXT conditions, so its charge state cannot be treated as fixed.

desk verdict The paper asks the right question and is honest about approximations, but the central millisecond timescale is undone by a factor-of-ten arithmetic slip and the ~100 ns drift sweep-out of the electrons it needs. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07156 v1 pith:TCBWFNF4 submitted 2026-08-07 physics.atom-ph nucl-ex

A. Peralta Conde This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atom-phnucl-ex

keywords neutrinolessdouble-betadecaybariumtaggingcharge-statedynamicsthree-bodyrecombinationhigh-pressurexenonNEXTdetectorelectrondiffusionion

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the doubly charged barium ion left behind when xenon-136 undergoes double-$\beta$ decay survives long enough in a high-pressure xenon detector to be tagged. It argues that binary recombination paths are suppressed, while three-body recombination $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+} + e^- + \mathrm{Xe} \to \mathrm{Ba}^+ + \mathrm{Xe}$ is physically plausible under NEXT-100 conditions. Using order-of-magnitude estimates for the local thermalized electron density and an extrapolated recombination coefficient, it obtains a conversion time of roughly 0.25--2.5 ms, comparable to NEXT's event-reconstruction window. The consequence the paper draws is that the barium charge state should be treated as a dynamical quantity when designing barium-tagging strategies, rather than assumed to stay $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the three-body recombination reaction $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+} + e^- + \mathrm{Xe} \to \mathrm{Ba}^+ + \mathrm{Xe}$ and its rate formula $\tau_3 = 1/(\alpha_3 n_e n_{\mathrm{Xe}})$. The paper's machinery is a chain of order-of-magnitude estimates: the first-ionization mean free path ($\sim 25\,\mu\mathrm{m}$) sets the initial electron--ion separation; thermalization and diffusion ($\tau_{\mathrm{th}} \sim 10^{-12}\,\mathrm{s}$, $t_{\mathrm{diff}} \sim 10^{-9}\,\mathrm{s}$) bring electrons to within the Coulomb capture radius ($\sim 1.1\,\mu\mathrm{m}$, where the ion's attraction equals the electron's thermal energy) and the field-balance radius ($\sim 2.4\,\mu\mathrm{m}$), where Coulomb attraction dominates over thermal motion and the drift field; the local thermalized electron density there is estimated as $n_e \sim 10^7\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}$; and the recombination coefficient $\alpha_3 \sim 10^{-25}$--$10^{-24}\,\mathrm{cm^6\,s^{-1}}$ is borrowed from measurements on other ions. This chain converts plasma microphysics into a millisecond charge-state lifetime.

What would settle it

A compact experiment in 15 bar xenon at room temperature would settle the claim: create a known $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}$ population and a known low-energy electron density, then time-resolve the growth of $\mathrm{Ba}^+$ fluorescence. A recombination time above roughly 25 ms at $n_e \sim 10^7\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}$ would put $\alpha_3$ below $10^{-26}\,\mathrm{cm^6\,s^{-1}}$ and invalidate the central conclusion; a time in the 0.25--2.5 ms range would support it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that under NEXT-100 operating conditions (15 bar xenon at room temperature, drift field around $500\,\mathrm{V\,cm^{-1}}$), the daughter $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}$ ion is not necessarily stable on the detector's readout timescale. It argues that the only viable recombination channel is three-body recombination with a thermalized electron and a neutral xenon atom, and estimates a characteristic time $\tau_3 = 1/(\alpha_3 n_e n_{\mathrm{Xe}})$ of 0.25--2.5 ms using an electron density $n_e \sim 10^7\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}$ near the ion and an extrapolated recombination coefficient $\alpha_3$ in the range $10^{-25}$ to $10^{-24}\,\mathrm{cm^6\,s^{-1}}$. Because event reconstruction takes several milliseconds, the paper concludes that the barium charge state should be regarded as dynamical rather than fixed, with direct consequences for which barium-tagging method can work.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the unmeasured reaction rate for the capture process is no smaller than about $10^{-25}\,\mathrm{cm^6\,s^{-1}}$; the paper infers this from measurements on a different ion in lighter gases, guided by xenon's larger polarizability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The daughter barium charge state should be treated as time-dependent in NEXT-style detectors, not assumed fixed at $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}$.
Barium-tagging schemes that target $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}$ selectively and schemes that target $\mathrm{Ba}^+$ or neutral Ba must include the recombination timescale to know which species is actually present when tagging begins.
Molecular sensing additives cannot be treated as passive spectators: low-energy secondary electrons can ionize them, adding electrons that increase the three-body recombination rate.
The millisecond recombination timescale overlaps with the several-millisecond event-reconstruction window, so the charge state at the end of readout may differ from the charge state at the decay.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct measurement of $\alpha_3$ in a bench-top high-pressure xenon cell would be the fastest way to confirm or reject the central number, since the paper itself notes no measurement exists for this system.
If the charge state evolves this quickly, calibrating barium-tagging techniques on pre-made $\mathrm{Ba}^{2+}$ ions in vacuum or low-pressure gas may not reproduce in-detector conditions, because the local electron cloud created by the beta track is what drives recombination.
The same three-body logic should apply to other high-pressure noble-gas detectors, with the rate modified by the third body's polarizability and the electron diffusion coefficient; xenon's large polarizability makes it a favorable case.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this if you care about barium tagging in high-pressure xenon. The paper gives the first quantitative estimate I know of for the lifetime of the Ba2+ daughter before three-body recombination, and it makes a fair case that charge state is a dynamical variable rather than an assumption. The writing is clear, the external data are cited sensibly, and the author's own prior Ba+ tagging proposal is the only self-reference — not a problem.

The soft spots are real, and one undermines the numerical conclusion. Equation (27) is wrong by a factor of ten: in SI, r* is about 0.24 μm, not 2.4 μm. That shrinks the Coulomb-dominated volume and weakens the claim that the Onsager radius and field-balance radius are both of order a few micrometers. More seriously, the recombination time in Eq. (30) uses a steady n_e ~ 10^7 cm^-3, but the paper never establishes that density persists. An electron at the characteristic 25 μm distance is removed by the 500 V/cm drift field in roughly 100 ns: with μ ~ 70 cm^2/V/s, v_drift ~ 3×10^4 cm/s. The time-integrated density is ∫n_e dt ~ 1 cm^-3 s, against the ~2.5×10^4 cm^-3 s needed for one recombination at the adopted α3. Diffusion is fast (~10^-9 s) but it is a random walk, not a trapping mechanism; the drift field wins. So even if α3 were exactly right, the millisecond conversion claim is unsupported. The α3 extrapolation from H3+ is a secondary weakness — no scaling law, large uncertainty — but the sweep-out problem is the load-bearing one.

The paper is not a waste of time. The question matters, the treatment is transparent, and the author is appropriately modest about the approximations. As a design basis, the quantitative result should not be used. As a prompt for measurement and simulation — and as a warning that BaTa schemes need to think about time-dependent charge state — it is useful.

I would send it to a serious referee. The right outcome is probably major revision: fix the arithmetic, add the drift-field time-integrated density, and either find a mechanism that holds electrons near the ion for milliseconds or soften the conclusion to something like 'unknown, and unlikely to be milliseconds under steady-state assumptions.'

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript addresses the charge-state evolution of the Ba2+ daughter ion produced in 136Xe double-beta decay under NEXT-100 operating conditions (15 bar xenon, 300 K, 500 V/cm drift field). The author argues that binary recombination channels are inefficient and that three-body recombination Ba2+ + e− + Xe → Ba+ + Xe is physically plausible on a timescale of 0.25–2.5 ms, comparable to event-reconstruction times. The estimate combines an extrapolated three-body recombination coefficient α3 ~ 10−25–10−24 cm6/s, a local electron density n_e ~ 10^7 cm−3 derived from a one-electron-per-25-µm-sphere argument, and the xenon density n_Xe ~ 4×10^20 cm−3. The paper concludes that the barium charge state should be treated as time-dependent in barium-tagging designs.

Significance. If correct, the manuscript would have a direct impact on the design of barium-tagging systems for NEXT and similar high-pressure xenon detectors, since current molecular-tagging approaches are selective for either Ba2+ or Ba+. The paper is useful in drawing attention to an understudied question and in organizing known cross-section and transport data. Its strengths are the clarity of the order-of-magnitude framework, the explicit acknowledgment of the absence of Ba2+–e−–Xe recombination data, and the identification of concrete physical channels to compare. However, the central numerical estimate rests on two quantities that are not established for the relevant conditions: the extrapolated three-body coefficient and, more importantly, the persistence of the local electron density against drift-field sweep-out. The manuscript is therefore better read as a proposal of a mechanism than as a quantitative prediction of its rate.

major comments (3)

[II.B, Eq. (27)] The numerical evaluation of the field-balance radius is incorrect by an order of magnitude. Substituting E_drift = 500 V/cm = 5×10^4 V/m into r* = sqrt(2e/(4πε0 E_drift)) gives r* ≈ 0.24 µm, not 2.4 µm. Similarly, the Onsager radius in Eq. (26) for Ba2+ at room temperature is r_O = 2e^2/(4πε0 k_B T) ≈ 0.11 µm, not 1.1 µm. Consequently, the statement that both radii are 'of the order of a few micrometers' and that r0 ~ 25 µm differs from them by 'only about one order of magnitude' is not correct: the Coulomb-dominated region is two orders of magnitude smaller than r0. This directly weakens the diffusion-access argument in Section II.B.
[II.B–II.C, Eqs. (18), (30), (31)] The recombination-time estimate treats n_e ~ 10^7 cm−3 as a steady ambient density, but no mechanism is identified that maintains a single electron in a 25-µm sphere for milliseconds. At 15 bar and 500 V/cm, an electron at r0 ~ 25 µm is swept out by the drift field in roughly 10^−7 s (taking an electron mobility of order 70 cm^2 V^−1 s^−1 gives v_d ~ 3×10^4 cm/s). The time-integrated electron density available for recombination is then ∫n_e dt ~ 1 cm^−3 s, whereas three-body recombination requires ∫n_e dt ~ (α3 n_Xe)^−1 ~ 10^3–10^4 cm^−3 s for the adopted α3 range. Even with the paper's assumed α3, the millisecond conversion timescale in Eq. (31) is therefore unsupported. The estimate would only be valid if electrons remained trapped near the ion for hundreds of microseconds or longer, which the drift-field analysis contradicts.
[II.A.2, Eq. (25)] The extrapolation of the three-body recombination coefficient from H3+ measurements in He/H2/Ar to the Ba2+–e−–Xe system is not quantitatively justified. The paper provides no scaling law with ionic charge, reduced mass, or third-body polarizability, and H3+ recombination involves dissociative channels that are absent for an atomic Ba2+ ion. The assertion that xenon's larger polarizability implies α3 should not be smaller is plausible but does not bracket the uncertainty. A sensitivity analysis over a wider α3 range (for example, one or two orders of magnitude below 10^−25 cm^6/s) is needed to determine whether the 'comparable to detection time' conclusion survives even before the drift-field effect is included.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] There are typographical errors in the abstract: 'chage-state' should be 'charge-state', and the phrase 'timescales -milliseconds-' uses nonstandard punctuation.
[II.A, Eq. (7)] For Eδ in the stated range 5–60 eV, the relation Nsec = Eδ/W_Xe gives values below 1 for Eδ below about 20 eV. The statement 'one expects Nsec ∼ 1–3' should be qualified as applying to the upper part of the energy range.
[II.B, Eqs. (28)–(29)] The diffusion coefficient D_e ≈ 150 cm^2 s^−1 is adopted from Ref. [27] without discussing whether it is consistent with the electron mobility and drift velocity at 15 bar and 500 V/cm; the consistency of these transport parameters is relevant to the residence-time argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the millisecond recombination time is a direct product of externally anchored inputs, and the only self-citation is not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central estimate, Eq. (31), is not fitted to its conclusion. The recombination time tau_3 = 1/(alpha_3 n_e n_Xe) is a direct product of three independently stated inputs: alpha_3 is taken from Glosik et al.'s measured H3+ ternary recombination coefficient, with an explicitly stated polarizability-motivated extrapolation (Eq. 25); n_e ~ 1e7 cm^-3 is a geometric estimate based on r0 ~ 25 um (Eq. 18); and n_Xe ~ 4e20 cm^-3 is the NEXT operating density (Eq. 1). None of these inputs is adjusted to force the 0.25-2.5 ms result, and the paper itself labels the outcome an order-of-magnitude estimate rather than a quantitative prediction. The only self-reference is Ref. [15], the author's earlier Ba+ tagging proposal, cited in the Introduction as an alternative tagging strategy; it does not enter the recombination-rate derivation and is therefore not load-bearing. A separate arithmetic concern exists in Eq. (27), where the stated 500 V/cm and the formula give r* = 0.24 um rather than the quoted 2.4 um; that is a correctness issue about whether electrons remain near the ion, not a circularity, because correcting the factor would weaken the physical argument but would not make Eq. (31) equivalent to its inputs. Thus the derivation is self-contained in the circularity sense, and no reduction of the central claim to its own assumptions or to a self-citation chain is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on externally supplied numbers (alpha3, sigma_ion, W_Xe) and one geometric model for ne. The two load-bearing choices are alpha3, extrapolated from H3+ data, and ne, a uniform-density approximation with no treatment of drift sweep-out. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)

alpha3 (three-body recombination coefficient) = 1e-25 to 1e-24 cm6 s^-1
Extrapolated from H3+ ternary recombination in He/H2/Ar; no direct measurement or calculation for Ba2+/e-/Xe; directly determines tau3 in Eq. 30.
local electron density ne = ~1e7 cm^-3
Estimated as one electron in a 25 um radius sphere (Eq. 18); neglects Coulomb focusing, drift-field sweep-out, and diffusion profile; directly determines tau3.
ionization cross section sigma_ion for 1 MeV electrons = ~1e-18 cm^2
Representative value selected from measured cross sections; sets lambda_ion = 25 um and thus the geometry used for ne.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Three-body recombination rate law R3 = alpha3 * ne * nXe applies in the weakly ionized high-pressure xenon environment.
Used in Eq. 23 to define the recombination rate; assumes a dilute plasma with constant local densities and a single effective alpha3.
ad hoc to paper The first ionizing collision occurs at the mean free path lambda_ion from the daughter ion, and one electron per 25 um sphere gives ne.
Eqs. 2 and 18; the paper acknowledges stochastic ionization but replaces it with a deterministic geometry to obtain the central electron density.
ad hoc to paper Thermal electrons can diffuse into the Onsager sphere and interact with Ba2+ despite the 500 V/cm drift field.
Section 2.B; diffusion time is computed, but the competing drift sweep-out is not modeled over the millisecond recombination window.
ad hoc to paper alpha3 for Ba2+/e-/Xe is no smaller than the measured H3+ values because xenon is more polarizable.
Eq. 25; this extrapolation determines the entire timescale estimate and is not backed by a scaling law or Ba2+-specific data.
domain assumption Bethe stopping and the cited MeV electron-impact ionization cross sections describe the beta track energetics.
Used in Section 2 to set lambda_ion and the delta-electron energy distribution; both are standard and externally measured.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Charge-state dynamics of barium ions in high-pressure xenon and its implications for Barium-Tagging in $0\nu\beta\beta$ searches." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TCBWFNF4

@misc{pith2026260807156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Charge-state dynamics of barium ions in high-pressure xenon and its implications for Barium-Tagging in $0\nu\beta\beta$ searches},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TCBWFNF4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07156}
}

abstract

Barium tagging (BaTa) is one of the most promising techniques for achieving a nearly background-free search for neutrinoless double-beta decay ($0\nu\beta\beta$) in high-pressure xenon time detection chambers. However, the experimental implementation of BaTa depends critically on the chage-state dynamics of the daughter Ba$^{2+}$ ion produced in the nuclear decay event. In this work, I review the possible recombination channels and evaluate their physical viability. The obtained results indicate that although binary recombination channels are strongly suppressed, three-body recombination assisted by neutral xenon atoms constitutes a physically plausible mechanism for the conversion of Ba$^{2+}$ into Ba$^+$ on timescales -milliseconds- comparable to the characteristic detection times in the NEXT experiment. These results suggest that the barium charge state should be regarded as a dynamical quantity with direct implications for the design and experimental implementation of BaTa techniques.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[1]

Charge-state dynamics of barium ions in high-pressure xenon and its implications for Barium-Tagging in $0\nu\beta\beta$ searches

INTRODUCTION Neutrinos remain among the least understood particles in the Standard Model. Despite the remarkable experimental progress achieved over the last decades, some of their most fundamental properties remain unknown. In particular, determining the neutrino mass ordering and establishing whether neutrinos are Dirac or Majorana particles are among t...

work page Pith review arXiv 2026
[2]

DYNAMICAL ESTIMA TE OF THE BA2+ SUR VIV AL PROBABILITY IN HIGH-PRESSURE XENON In this section, a simplified physical picture is constructed for the microscopic environment created immediately after the double beta decay of 136Xe in high-pressure xenon gas. Rather than attempting to predict the lifetime of the daughter ion quantitatively, the purpose is to...

work page
[3]

•Radiative recombination Ba2+ +e − →Ba + +hν.(19) In this process the excess binding energy is released through the emission of a photon

Binary recombination mechanisms The most relevant binary channels are radiative recombination, transient molecular complex formation, and colli- sional charge transfer. •Radiative recombination Ba2+ +e − →Ba + +hν.(19) In this process the excess binding energy is released through the emission of a photon. Radiative recombina- tion is generally inefficient...

work page
[4]

Three-body recombination as a possible dominant mechanism The discussion above suggests that the binary recombination mechanisms are either energetically unfavorable or intrinsically inefficient under the operating conditions of the NEXT experiment. Under these conditions, three-body recombination assisted by a neutral xenon atom is expected to constitute...

work page
[5]

Novella, et al., J

P. Novella, et al., J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 190, 2023

work page 2023
[6]

CONCLUSIONS In this work, I present an order-of-magnitude analysis of the possible recombination of the Ba 2+ ion produced in a double-beta decay event under the operating conditions of the NEXT experiment. The results indicate that three-body recombination constitutes a physically plausible mechanism for the conversion of Ba2+ into Ba+ on timescales comp...

work page
[7]

Sajjad Athar, et al., Prog

M. Sajjad Athar, et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 124, 103947, 2022

work page 2022
[8]

Gando, et al., Phys

A. Gando, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(6), 062502, 2013

work page 2013

Show all 35 references

[9]

Gando, et al., Phys

A. Gando, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 082503–082506, 2016

2016
[10]

Majorana, Nuovo Cim

E. Majorana, Nuovo Cim. 14, 171–184, 1937

1937
[11]

D. R. Nygren, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 650, 012002, 2015

2015
[12]

M. K. Moe, Phys. Rev. C 44, 931–934, 1991

1991
[13]

Danilov, Phys

M. Danilov, Phys. Lett. B 480, 12–18, 2000

2000
[14]

Sinclair, et al., J

D. Sinclair, et al., J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 309, 012005, 2011

2011
[15]

Mong, et al., Phys

B. Mong, et al., Phys. Rev. A 91, 022505–022513, 2015

2015
[16]

J. B. Albert, et al, Phys. Rev. C 92, 045504–045510, 2015

2015
[17]

Sorokin et al., Phys

A. Sorokin et al., Phys. Rev. A, 61, 022723, 2000

2000
[18]

Thapa, et al., Sci

P. Thapa, et al., Sci. Rep. 9, 15097, 2019

2019
[19]

nEXO Collaboration, Nature 569, 203–207, 2019

2019
[20]

Rivilla, et al., Nature 583, 48–54, 2020

I. Rivilla, et al., Nature 583, 48–54, 2020

2020
[21]

Peralta Conde, Phys

A. Peralta Conde, Phys. Rev. A 111, 063114, 2025

2025
[22]

Segr` e (Ed.), Experimental Nuclear Physics, John Wiley and Sons, Chapman and Hall., 1953

E. Segr` e (Ed.), Experimental Nuclear Physics, John Wiley and Sons, Chapman and Hall., 1953

1953
[23]

R. K. Janev and H. Winter, Phys. Rep., 117, 1985

1985
[24]

report ternary recombination coefficients for H + 3 ions in He/H 2/Ar plasmas of approximately α3 ∼3×10 −25 cm6 s−1.(24) Although no quantitative scaling law exists to extrapolate this value to xenon, the considerably larger polarizability of Xe suggests that the corresponding...
[25]

Database of Cross Sections for Inner-Shell Ionization by Electron or Positron Impact , 2014

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Database of Cross Sections for Inner-Shell Ionization by Electron or Positron Impact , 2014

2014
[26]

A. E. Bolotnikov and B. Ramsey, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 396, 360–370, 1997

1997
[27]

Dababneh, et al., Phys

M.S. Dababneh, et al., Phys. Rev. A, 26, 3, 1982. 9

1982
[28]

Hayashi, Bibliography of Electron and Photon Cross Sections with Atoms and Molecules, National Institute for Fusion Science, NIFS-DATA-72, 2003

M. Hayashi, Bibliography of Electron and Photon Cross Sections with Atoms and Molecules, National Institute for Fusion Science, NIFS-DATA-72, 2003

2003
[29]

B. M. Smirnov, Physics of Ionized Gases, Wiley-VCH, 2001

2001
[30]

Glosik, et al., J

J. Glosik, et al., J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41, 191001, 2008

2008
[31]

Y. P. Raizer, Gas Discharge Physics, Springer, 1991

1991
[32]

Onsager, Phys

L. Onsager, Phys. Rev., 54(8), 554–557, 1938

1938
[33]

Njoya, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 972, 163965, 2020

O. Njoya, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 972, 163965, 2020

2020
[34]

Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion

J. Crank, The Mathematics of Diffusion. 2nd Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1979

1979
[35]

Monrabal (private communication, 2024)

F. Monrabal (private communication, 2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Charge-state dynamics of barium ions in high-pressure xenon and its implications for Barium-Tagging in $0\nu\beta\beta$ searches

INTRODUCTION Neutrinos remain among the least understood particles in the Standard Model. Despite the remarkable experimental progress achieved over the last decades, some of their most fundamental properties remain unknown. In particular, determining the neutrino mass ordering and establishing whether neutrinos are Dirac or Majorana particles are among t...

work page Pith review arXiv 2026

[2] [2]

DYNAMICAL ESTIMA TE OF THE BA2+ SUR VIV AL PROBABILITY IN HIGH-PRESSURE XENON In this section, a simplified physical picture is constructed for the microscopic environment created immediately after the double beta decay of 136Xe in high-pressure xenon gas. Rather than attempting to predict the lifetime of the daughter ion quantitatively, the purpose is to...

work page

[3] [3]

•Radiative recombination Ba2+ +e − →Ba + +hν.(19) In this process the excess binding energy is released through the emission of a photon

Binary recombination mechanisms The most relevant binary channels are radiative recombination, transient molecular complex formation, and colli- sional charge transfer. •Radiative recombination Ba2+ +e − →Ba + +hν.(19) In this process the excess binding energy is released through the emission of a photon. Radiative recombina- tion is generally inefficient...

work page

[4] [4]

Three-body recombination as a possible dominant mechanism The discussion above suggests that the binary recombination mechanisms are either energetically unfavorable or intrinsically inefficient under the operating conditions of the NEXT experiment. Under these conditions, three-body recombination assisted by a neutral xenon atom is expected to constitute...

work page

[5] [5]

Novella, et al., J

P. Novella, et al., J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 190, 2023

work page 2023

[6] [6]

CONCLUSIONS In this work, I present an order-of-magnitude analysis of the possible recombination of the Ba 2+ ion produced in a double-beta decay event under the operating conditions of the NEXT experiment. The results indicate that three-body recombination constitutes a physically plausible mechanism for the conversion of Ba2+ into Ba+ on timescales comp...

work page

[7] [7]

Sajjad Athar, et al., Prog

M. Sajjad Athar, et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 124, 103947, 2022

work page 2022

[8] [8]

Gando, et al., Phys

A. Gando, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(6), 062502, 2013

work page 2013