Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 78 references

Five-brane webs, 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories and quantum curves

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A brane configuration's three-sphere partition function is written as a determinant of the inverse quantum curve whose Newton polygon is the web's dual toric diagram.

desk verdict Solid p=0,1 Lagrangian derivation and a clearly stated conjecture, but the p≥2 extension rests entirely on an unproven input from prior work and the checks are consistency checks, not independent tests. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.04146 v3 pith:TEJLVDAY submitted 2025-01-07 hep-th

Naotaka Kubo This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords five-branewebs(pq)five-branes3dN=2Chern-SimonstheoriesquantumcurvesNewtonpolygonstoricdiagramsFermigasformalismS^3partitionfunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that a brane configuration of D3-branes and $(p,q)$ five-brane webs — the standard engineering setup for 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ Chern-Simons theories — determines its own quantum curve. The proposed formula writes the $S^3$ partition function of the worldvolume theory as a determinant of the inverse of a quantum-curve operator, and the central conjecture is that the Newton polygon of that curve equals the toric diagram dual to the combined brane web. For every configuration with a Lagrangian description the relation is derived from supersymmetric localization followed by the Fermi gas formalism, so within that class the statement is a theorem rather than a conjecture. For non-Lagrangian webs, including $(p,q)$ five-branes with arbitrary $p$, the paper uses the conjecture to propose matrix models and checks them against web deformations and $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ duality. If correct, the dictionary turns any toric diagram into a brane construction, a matrix model, and a genus-one quantum curve.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the inverse one-particle density matrix of a Fermi gas. After supersymmetric localization reduces the $S^3$ partition function to a matrix integral, the Cauchy determinant formula rewrites the one-loop determinant as a determinant of a single-particle kernel, and the kernel is expressed as a matrix element of a density operator $\hat{\rho}$; the quantum curve is defined as $\hat{O}=\hat{\rho}^{-1}$. The computation is carried by the double-sine identity $s_b(z+ib^{\pm1}/2)s_b(z-ib^{\pm1}/2)=1/(2\cosh \pi b^{\pm1}z)$, which turns the double-sine factors coming from chiral multiplets into exponentials and cosines, and by the fact that multiplying curves adds their Newton polygons as Minkowski sums, so gluing $(p,q)$ webs multiplies their quantum curves and combines their toric diagrams.

What would settle it

Evaluate the proposed matrix model for a small concrete $p\ge 2$ case, for example a single $(2,1)$ web with one D5-brane at rank $N=1$ or $N=2$, by an independent method such as direct numerical evaluation of the Fermi-gas determinant or localization on a candidate dual theory, and compare it with the determinant formula built from the quantum curve in (4.17); any mismatch at finite $N$ would refute the central conjecture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a conjectural dictionary. To a set $\mathcal{W}$ of $(p,q)$ webs separated along the compact direction one assigns an operator $\hat{O}(\hat{x},\hat{y})$ with $[\hat{x},\hat{y}]=2\pi i$, and the $S^3$ partition function of the worldvolume theory is written as $Z^{\mathcal{W}}=\int \prod_a d\mu_a \det[\langle \mu_a|\hat{O}(\hat{x},\hat{y})^{-1}|\mu_b\rangle]$. The conjecture states that the Newton polygon of $\hat{O}$ is precisely the dual toric diagram of the combined $(p,q)$ web $\mathcal{W}$, and that the asymptotic real parts of the classical curve $O(x,y)=0$ reproduce the positions of the web's external legs. For Lagrangian theories the paper proves the statement: each matrix factor from localization is rewritten as a one-particle density matrix of an ideal Fermi gas, its inverse is computed explicitly as a Laurent polynomial in $e^{\pm \hat{x}/2}, e^{\pm \hat{y}/2}$, and the double-sine identities convert D5-brane insertions into the cosine factors of the curve. For $p\ge 2$ webs, where no Lagrangian is known, the paper proposes modified D5-brane factors involving double sine functions with rescaled arguments and derives new matrix models whose quantum curves have the predicted Newton polygons.

Load-bearing premise

The whole extension to $p\ge 2$ rests on a previously conjectured, unproved formula for how a general $(p,q)$ five-brane contributes to the matrix model; if that formula is wrong, the new matrix models for $p\ge 2$ do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every Lagrangian brane configuration built from $(p,q)$ webs with $p=0,1$ gains an explicit Fermi-gas expression, making its $S^3$ partition function computable as a spectral determinant of a quantum curve.
  • Any toric diagram that arises as a Minkowski sum of elementary web diagrams can be realized by a brane configuration, so quantum curves of arbitrary Newton polygon come equipped with 3d worldvolume theories.
  • The proposed D5-brane factors give matrix model representations for non-Lagrangian webs containing a $(p,q)$ five-brane with arbitrary $p$, extending the dictionary beyond known gauge theories.
  • The genus-one curves tied to the $q$-Painlevé equations are realized by explicit brane configurations and matrix models, including the $\hbar=2\pi\ell$ cases; the $\tilde{E}_1$ curve matches the ABJM quantum curve under a parameter identification.
  • Web deformations act as degenerations of the quantum curve, and $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$ transformations act as similarity transformations, so the conjecture is consistent with known brane dualities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One could reverse the dictionary and engineer a 3d theory from any chosen toric diagram, turning spectral questions about quantum curves into questions about which brane web realizes a given Newton polygon; the paper gestures at this but does not develop it.
  • The $p\ge2$ matrix factors inherit the conjectural status of the input formula, so a small-rank numerical check against an independent method would sharpen the evidence.
  • Because the construction yields $\hbar=2\pi\ell$ only for integer $\ell$, the dictionary suggests a discrete family of Planck constants tied to integer brane charges; interpolating to real $\hbar$ would require a new ingredient.
  • The ABJM matching shows the same quantum curve can arise from different brane geometries, so the correspondence is many-to-one; identifying the Calabi-Yau geometry behind the toric diagram would be needed to decide which brane data is physically meaningful.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a conjectural correspondence between type IIB brane configurations consisting of D3-branes and (p,q) 5-brane webs on the one hand, and quantum curves on the other. The central conjecture, stated in Section 3.1.1 as Eq. (3.2), is that the S^3 partition function of the worldvolume 3d N=2 theory can be written as an integral over a determinant of the inverse of a quantum-curve operator, with the Newton polygon of that operator equal to the dual toric diagram of the combined (p,q) web. For webs with p=0,1, where the worldvolume theory has a Lagrangian description, the conjecture is derived by combining supersymmetric localization with the Fermi gas formalism: the density matrix is computed explicitly and its inverse is shown to have the expected Newton polygon and asymptotic behavior (Section 3.2). For webs containing a (p,q)5-brane with p>=2, the paper proposes new D5-brane matrix factors and new matrix models for non-Lagrangian theories (Section 4), and uses these to construct genus-one quantum curves with hbar=2*pi*ell (Section 5.1.2). The paper also discusses consistency with web deformations and SL(2,Z) dualities.

Significance. If the conjectural correspondence is correct, it would provide a unified bridge between brane configurations, matrix models, and quantum curves for a broad class of 3d N=2 theories, going beyond the rectangle Newton polygons previously studied in the ABJM literature. The Lagrangian derivation in Section 3.2 is a concrete and checkable technical achievement: the density matrix is explicitly computed and inverted, and the resulting Newton polygons are read off directly. This part of the paper is self-contained and gives a genuine derivation for the p=0,1 class. The proposed p>=2 extension, including the D5-brane factors and the non-Lagrangian matrix models, is novel in scope but rests on an imported conjecture rather than on an independent derivation; its status is therefore weaker. The paper is honest about this dependence, but as it stands the central claim is fully established only within the Lagrangian class.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1, Eq. (4.1)] The entire p>=2 construction is built on the matrix factor for a single (p,q)5-brane stated in Eq. (4.1), which the paper explicitly imports from Refs. [63,66] and treats as a conjecture rather than as a derived localization result. Every subsequent p>=2 statement, including the modified D5-brane factors in Eq. (4.9), the matrix models for non-Lagrangian webs, and the hbar=2*pi*ell genus-one constructions in Section 5.1.2, depends on this input. If Eq. (4.1) is incorrect in normalization, phase, or overall structure, the p>=2 part of the paper collapses. The authors should either provide a first-principles derivation of Eq. (4.1) or supply an independent finite-N numerical check of the proposed matrix factor against a reliable non-perturbative definition of the relevant 3d theory.
  2. [Section 4.1, Eqs. (4.6)-(4.9)] The constants c_i and c_m in the proposed D5-brane factors are not derived from the brane or gauge-theory construction; they are fixed by demanding that the inverse density matrix take the conjectured quantum-curve form (Eqs. (4.5)-(4.8)) and by a variable-shift consistency argument. This means that the verification in Section 4.2 that the resulting operator has the expected Newton polygon and asymptotic behavior is a self-consistency check of the ansatz, not an independent test of the conjecture. The paper should state this limitation explicitly in Section 4 and explain what external evidence would break the circularity, for example a localization computation for a specific p>=2 example or a comparison with an independently known partition function.
  3. [Section 5.1.2, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.46)] The construction of genus-one quantum curves with hbar=2*pi*ell relies on using (p,q)=(ell,1) or (ell,3) 5-branes, i.e. p>=2 whenever ell>1. Therefore all matrix models and quantum curves in Section 5.1.2 inherit the conjectural status of Eq. (4.1). The paper presents these as consequences of the proposed matrix factors, but without an independent derivation of Eq. (4.1) they cannot be regarded as evidence for the central conjecture; they are applications of the same assumption. This should be made clear in the text, and the distinction between derived p=0,1 results and conjectural p>=2 results should be maintained in the summary and conclusion.
  4. [Section 3.1.1, second property after Eq. (3.2)] The second property of the conjecture, concerning the real parts of asymptotic values of the classical curve, is verified in Section 3.2 only for the Lagrangian cases and in Section 4.2 only for the ansatz-based p>=2 factors. For the general non-Lagrangian webs mentioned in Section 3.1.1, no argument is given that such a property should hold, beyond the dual-toric-diagram intuition. Since this property is used to identify coefficients of boundary terms of the quantum curve, it would strengthen the paper to state explicitly that for general webs it remains an unproven part of the conjecture rather than a consequence of the matrix-model construction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.3.1, around Eq. (3.27)] There is a typo: 'Z (1,0) 1,0,0 ... cab be read off' should read 'can be read off.'
  2. [Section 4.1, paragraph before Eq. (4.3)] The phrase 'changing the subscription of the double sine function' should be 'changing the subscript of the double sine function.'
  3. [Section 2.1, notation after Eq. (2.2)] The notation '−p' for periodic boundary conditions is introduced but could be confused with the charge p of a (p,q)5-brane; a brief explanatory remark or a different symbol would improve readability.
  4. [Section 5.1.2, Eqs. (5.20)-(5.46)] The conditions on ell (for example gcd(ell,2)=1 for E6 and gcd(ell,6)=1 for E2) are stated but not derived. A short explanation of why these restrictions are necessary for the toric diagrams to avoid additional vertices would be helpful.
  5. [Section 3.3.2, figure 10 discussion] The text says 'we form any (p,q) web by gluing this (p,q) web' but does not give a precise gluing prescription; a precise statement or a reference would make the claim easier to verify.
  6. [Section 5.1.1, table 2] The table is useful but the column 'Number of parameters of the En curve' and the following rows rely on a normalization convention that is not fully defined in the text; the reader would benefit from a sentence explaining the counting rule.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The p≥2 extension is built from D5 factors whose constants are fixed by the conjecture itself, making the Sec. 4.2 quantum-curve check a self-consistency check; the Lagrangian p=0,1 derivation remains independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.1 (Eqs. (4.6)-(4.10)) and Section 4.2 (Eq. (4.17))]
    "ci can be determined from the conjecture. Namely, we again demand that (the inverse of) the operator becomes a quantum curve. / In this section we explicitly check that the proposed matrix factor Z(p,q)F,F+,F− gives the quantum curve which is expected from the conjecture suggested in section 3.1.2. / This is clearly the form of the quantum curve, and the Newton polygon of this curve is equal to TD(w(p,q)F,F+,F−)."

    The p≥2 D5-brane factors (4.9) are not derived from localization. The constant ci is set to √p 'from the conjecture' by demanding that the inverse density matrix becomes a quantum curve, and cm = 1/√p is fixed so that the constant-shift behavior reproduces the expected brane-parameter dictionary. Both constants are chosen so that the input produces the conjectured output. Section 4.2 then 'explicitly check[s]' that the inverse of the density matrix built from these fitted factors has the conjectured Newton polygon; this is a self-consistency check of an ansatz, not independent evidence, because (4.17) follows from the identity (4.16) that was used to select (4.9). The whole p≥2 construction also inherits the conjectural status of (4.1) from Refs.

full rationale

The paper is not circular for the Lagrangian class: Section 3.2 derives the quantum-curve representation from supersymmetric localization and the Fermi gas formalism, explicitly inverting the one-particle density matrices for (1,q), (1,q)+D5 stacks and isolated D5-branes, and the Newton polygons are then computed rather than imposed. The web-deformation limits (Section 3.3) and SL(2,Z) checks (Section 3.4) are genuine consistency checks using independent matrix-model results. The circularity is confined to the p≥2 extension. There, no localization derivation is available; the modified D5 factors are constructed by fixing ci and cm so that the inverse density matrix has the conjectured curve form, and the subsequent 'check' of the Newton polygon in Section 4.2 is a tautology. This makes the p≥2 matrix models and the non-Lagrangian applications of Section 5 conditional on the conjectural input (4.1), rather than independent confirmations. Because the central conjecture has substantial independent content for p=0,1 and the paper labels the p≥2 part as a suggestion, the overall circularity is partial, not total.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim relies on the standard localization matrix model, the double sine identities used to exhibit curve factors, and the conjectural (p,q)5-brane matrix factor (4.1). For p>=2, the D5 factors are fixed by consistency with the conjecture itself, which is the main circularity burden. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • cm (coefficient of z in D5 factors for p>=2) = 1/√p
    Fixed in Section 4.1 by demanding the constant shift of integration variables is consistent with the brane picture.
  • ci (imaginary shift in D5 factors for p>=2) = √p
    Fixed in Section 4.1 by demanding the inverse density matrix becomes a quantum curve, i.e., by the conjecture itself.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The S^3 partition function of a 3d N=2 Lagrangian theory is given by the localization matrix model (2.25)-(2.30).
    Standard result of Kapustin-Willett-Yaakov localization; the paper cites [31] and uses it in Section 2.3.
  • standard math The double sine function identities (A.2)-(A.4), including the generalized s_√p version, hold.
    These are standard properties of the double sine function; the paper uses them in equations (3.17) and (4.16) to turn products into curve factors.
  • domain assumption The matrix factor for a (p,q)5-brane is given by Eq. (4.1), as conjectured in Refs. [63,66].
    This is the starting point for all p>=2 results in Section 4; it is cited as a conjecture, not derived in this paper.
  • ad hoc to paper For brane configurations with p>=2, the worldvolume theory is a 3d N=2 theory and its partition function is obtained by gluing the conjectured matrix factors.
    This is the conjecture applied to non-Lagrangian theories; the paper labels it as a suggestion in Sections 3.1 and 4.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Five-brane webs, 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ theories and quantum curves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TEJLVDAY

@misc{pith2026250104146,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Five-brane webs, 3d $\mathcalN=2$ theories and quantum curves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TEJLVDAY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.04146}
}
abstract

We propose a relation between the brane configurations consisting of D3-branes and 5-brane webs which realize 3d $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetric Chern-Simons theories and quantum curves by focusing on the $S^{3}$ partition functions. In particular, we conjecture that the Newton polygons of the quantum curves are equal to the toric diagrams which are dual to the 5-brane webs. For brane configurations whose worldvolume theories have Lagrangian descriptions, we show an explicit derivation of the relation by using the supersymmetric localization and the Fermi gas formalism. We also provide some evidence of the conjecture for non-Lagrangian theories. We see that our conjecture gives us new matrix models for 5-brane webs including a $\left(p,q\right)$5-brane with arbitrary $p$. This leads to explicit relations between the brane configurations, the matrix models and genus one quantum curves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.04146 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Four (p, q) webs. (i): A (p, q) web consisting of an NS5-brane and a D5-brane. (ii): A (1, 1)5-brane is generated at the center. (iii), (iv): Junctions of an NS5-brane and a D5-brane merging into a (1, 1)5-brane. The (p, q) web in (iii) can be obtained by deforming the right D5-brane in (ii) to +x 5 , while the (p, q) web in (iv) can be obtained by deforming the left D5-brane in (ii) to −x 5 .  [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:fi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Two (p, q) webs at a fixed x 6 . The left and right figures show F− = 0, F+ ≥ 0 and F− ≥ 0, F+ = 0 cases, respectively. F is also non-negative integer. the right (left) D5-brane (which extends in the ±x 9 direction) in the ±x 5 direction, we obtain the (p, q) web in figure 1 (ii). Furthermore, by moving the right (left) D5-brane in positive (negative) infinite, we obtain the (p, q)5-brane of figure 1 (iii) (or (iv))… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Two toric diagrams which are dual to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of W =  w (1) , w (2) and the dual toric diagrams of them. The combined (p, q) web W and the dual toric diagram of it are also depicted on the right side. 2.2 3d N = 2 supersymmetric theories The worldvolume theory on D3-branes is a 3d supersymmetric gauge …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The position of 5-branes for three examples. The up direction is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three (p, q) webs and the corresponding quiver diagrams. (ii) (or (iii)) is obtained from (i) (or (ii)) by the web deformation. The subscripts of the gauge nodes denote the CS levels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two (p, q) webs and their dual toric diagrams. curves up to an overall factor Oˆ(E′ 1) (ˆx, yˆ) ∝   +c1,−1e xˆ−yˆ +c1,0e xˆ +0 +0 +0 +c0,1e yˆ +0 +c−1,0e −xˆ +0   , Oˆ(E0) (ˆx, yˆ) ∝   +c1,−1e xˆ−yˆ +0 +0 +0 +0 +c0,1e yˆ +0 +c−1,0e −xˆ +0   . (3.3) The Newt…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Two examples of web deformations. Starting from (i), we move the right D5-brane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Two examples of web deformations. In each step, we need to move the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: A web deformation and it in terms of the dual toric diagrams. The web deformation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The relation of the deformation parameters under the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Genus one curves in terms of the Newton polygons (or equivalently the toric dia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Genus one curves in terms of the Newton polygons (or equivalently the toric dia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory”, Nucl. Phys. B426, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 430, 485–486 (1994)], 19 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9407087

    arXiv 1994

  2. [2]

    Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M-theory

    E. Witten, “Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M-theory”, Nucl. Phys. B500, 3 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9703166

    arXiv 1997

  3. [3]

    Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting

    N. A. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from instanton counting”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, 831 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0206161

    arXiv 2003

  4. [4]

    Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theories”, in 16th International Congress on Mathematical Physics (2010), pp. 265–289, arXiv:0908.4052 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  5. [5]

    Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov, “Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions”, Prog. Math. 244, 525 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0306238

    arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    Conformal field theory of Painlevé VI

    O. Gamayun, N. Iorgov, and O. Lisovyy, “Conformal field theory of Painlevé VI”, JHEP 10, [Erratum: JHEP 10, 183 (2012)], 038 (2012), arXiv:1207.0787 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  7. [7]

    How instanton combinatorics solves Painlevé VI, V and IIIs

    O. Gamayun, N. Iorgov, and O. Lisovyy, “How instanton combinatorics solves Painlevé VI, V and IIIs”, J. Phys. A46, 335203 (2013), arXiv:1302.1832 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

  8. [8]

    Painlevé VI connection problem and monodromy of c = 1 conformal blocks

    N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy, and Y. Tykhyy, “Painlevé VI connection problem and monodromy of c = 1 conformal blocks”, JHEP12, 029 (2013), arXiv:1308.4092 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Isomonodromic tau-functions from Liouville conformal blocks

    N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy, and J. Teschner, “Isomonodromic tau-functions from Liouville conformal blocks”, Commun. Math. Phys.336, 671 (2015), arXiv:1401.6104 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Connection problem for the sine-Gordon/Painlevé III tau function and irregular conformal blocks

    A. Its, O. Lisovyy, and Y. Tykhyy, “Connection problem for the sine-Gordon/Painlevé III tau function and irregular conformal blocks”,10.1093/imrn/rnu209 (2014), arXiv:1403. 1235 [math-ph]

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    Bilinear equations on Painlevéτ functions from CFT

    M. A. Bershtein and A. I. Shchechkin, “Bilinear equations on Painlevéτ functions from CFT”, Commun. Math. Phys.339, 1021 (2015), arXiv:1406.3008 [math-ph]. 56

    2015 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Fredholm Determinant and Nekrasov Sum Representa- tionsofIsomonodromicTauFunctions

    P. Gavrylenko and O. Lisovyy, “Fredholm Determinant and Nekrasov Sum Representa- tionsofIsomonodromicTauFunctions”,Commun.Math.Phys. 363,1(2018),arXiv: 1608. 00958 [math-ph]

    2018

  5. [13]

    ConformalblocksandPainlevéfunctions

    H.Nagoya,“ConformalblocksandPainlevéfunctions”,(2016),arXiv: 1611.08971 [math-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    On Painlevé/gauge theorycorrespondence

    G. Bonelli, O. Lisovyy, K. Maruyoshi, A. Sciarappa, and A. Tanzini, “On Painlevé/gauge theorycorrespondence”,Lett.Matth.Phys. 107,2359(2017),arXiv: 1612.06235 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Pure SU(2) gauge theory partition function and gen- eralized Bessel kernel

    P. Gavrylenko and O. Lisovyy, “Pure SU(2) gauge theory partition function and gen- eralized Bessel kernel.”, Proc. Symp. Pure Math.18, edited by A.-K. Kashani-Poor, R. Minasian, N. Nekrasov, and B. Pioline, 181 (2018), arXiv:1705.01869 [math-ph]

    2018

  8. [16]

    Seiberg–Witten theory as a Fermi gas

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi, and A. Tanzini, “Seiberg–Witten theory as a Fermi gas”, Lett. Math. Phys. 107, 1 (2017), arXiv:1603.01174 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    q-deformed Painlevéτ function and q-deformed conformal blocks

    M. A. Bershtein and A. I. Shchechkin, “q-deformed Painlevéτ function and q-deformed conformal blocks”, J. Phys. A50, 085202 (2017), arXiv:1608.02566 [math-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Jimbo, H

    M. Jimbo, H. Nagoya, and H. Sakai, Cft approach to the q-painlevé vi equation , 2017, arXiv:1706.01940 [math-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [19]

    q-Painlevé equation from Virasoro constraints

    A. Mironov and A. Morozov, “q-Painlevé equation from Virasoro constraints”, Phys. Lett. B 785, 207 (2018), arXiv:1708.07479 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Geometric aspects of painleve equations

    K. Kajiwara, M. Noumi, and Y. Yamada, “Geometric aspects of painleve equations”, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical50, 073001 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Geometric engineering of quantum field theories

    S. H. Katz, A. Klemm, and C. Vafa, “Geometric engineering of quantum field theories”, Nucl. Phys. B497, 173 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9609239

    1997 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Rational Surfaces Associated with Affine Root Systemsand Geometry of the Painlevé Equations

    H. Sakai, “Rational Surfaces Associated with Affine Root Systemsand Geometry of the Painlevé Equations”, Communications in Mathematical Physics220, 165 (2001)

    2001

  15. [23]

    Topological Strings from Quantum Mechanics

    A. Grassi, Y. Hatsuda, and M. Marino, “Topological Strings from Quantum Mechanics”, Annales Henri Poincare17, 3177 (2016), arXiv:1410.3382 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Spectral Theory and Mirror Curves of Higher Genus

    S. Codesido, A. Grassi, and M. Marino, “Spectral Theory and Mirror Curves of Higher Genus”, Annales Henri Poincare18, 559 (2017), arXiv:1507.02096 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Spectral Theories and Topological Strings on del Pezzo Geometries

    S. Moriyama, “Spectral Theories and Topological Strings on del Pezzo Geometries”, JHEP 10, 154 (2020), arXiv:2007.05148 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Spectral theory and mirror symmetry

    M. Marino, “Spectral theory and mirror symmetry.”, Proc. Symp. Pure Math.98, edited byA.-K.Kashani-Poor,R.Minasian,N.Nekrasov,andB.Pioline,259(2018),arXiv: 1506. 07757 [math-ph]. 57

    2018

  19. [27]

    N=6 superconformal Chern- Simons-mattertheories,M2-branesandtheirgravityduals

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis, and J. Maldacena, “N=6 superconformal Chern- Simons-mattertheories,M2-branesandtheirgravityduals”,JHEP 10,091(2008),arXiv: 0806. 1218 [hep-th]

    2008

  20. [28]

    N=5,6 Superconformal Chern- Simons Theories and M2-branes on Orbifolds

    K. Hosomichi, K.-M. Lee, S. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “N=5,6 Superconformal Chern- Simons Theories and M2-branes on Orbifolds”, JHEP09, 002 (2008), arXiv:0806.4977 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Fractional M2-branes

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, and D. L. Jafferis, “Fractional M2-branes”, JHEP 11, 043 (2008), arXiv:0807.4924 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops

    V. Pestun, “Localization of gauge theory on a four-sphere and supersymmetric Wilson loops”, Commun. Math. Phys.313, 71 (2012), arXiv:0712.2824 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Supercon- formal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter

    A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, “Exact Results for Wilson Loops in Supercon- formal Chern-Simons Theories with Matter”, JHEP 03, 089 (2010), arXiv:0909 . 4559 [hep-th]

    2010

  24. [32]

    Exact Results in ABJM Theory from Topological Strings

    M. Marino and P. Putrov, “Exact Results in ABJM Theory from Topological Strings”, JHEP 06, 011 (2010), arXiv:0912.3074 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  25. [33]

    ABJM theory as a Fermi gas

    M. Marino and P. Putrov, “ABJM theory as a Fermi gas”, J. Stat. Mech.1203, P03001 (2012), arXiv:1110.4066 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Quantum curves andq-deformed Painleve equa- tions

    G. Bonelli, A. Grassi, and A. Tanzini, “Quantum curves andq-deformed Painleve equa- tions”, Lett. Math. Phys.109, 1961 (2019), arXiv:1710.11603 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    M2-branes andq-Painlevé equations

    G. Bonelli, F. Globlek, N. Kubo, T. Nosaka, and A. Tanzini, “M2-branes andq-Painlevé equations”, Lett. Math. Phys.112, 109 (2022), arXiv:2202.10654 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Newresultsin N = 2theoriesfromnon-perturbative string

    G.Bonelli,A.Grassi,andA.Tanzini,“Newresultsin N = 2theoriesfromnon-perturbative string”, Annales Henri Poincare19, 743 (2018), arXiv:1704.01517 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  29. [37]

    SU(N) q-Toda equations from mass deformed ABJM theory

    T. Nosaka, “SU(N) q-Toda equations from mass deformed ABJM theory”, JHEP06, 060 (2021), arXiv:2012.07211 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Instanton effects in ABJM theory with general R-charge assignments

    T. Nosaka, “Instanton effects in ABJM theory with general R-charge assignments”, JHEP 03, 059 (2016), arXiv:1512.02862 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Hanany-Witten Transition in Quantum Curves

    N. Kubo and S. Moriyama, “Hanany-Witten Transition in Quantum Curves”, JHEP12, 101 (2019), arXiv:1907.04971 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Fermi gas approach to general rank theories and quantum curves

    N. Kubo, “Fermi gas approach to general rank theories and quantum curves”, JHEP10, 158 (2020), arXiv:2007.08602 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    TypeIIBsuperstrings,BPSmonopoles,andthree-dimensional gauge dynamics

    A. HananyandE.Witten,“TypeIIBsuperstrings,BPSmonopoles,andthree-dimensional gauge dynamics”, Nucl. Phys. B492, 152 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9611230. 58

    1997 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Brane Dynamics and Gauge Theory

    A. Giveon and D. Kutasov, “Brane Dynamics and Gauge Theory”, Rev. Mod. Phys.71, edited by F. A. Bais, E. A. Bergshoeff, B. de Wit, R. Dijkgraaf, A. N. Schellekens, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, 983 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9802067

    1999 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points

    O. Aharony and A. Hanany, “Branes, superpotentials and superconformal fixed points”, Nucl. Phys. B504, 239 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9704170

    1997 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, and B. Kol, “Webs of (p,q) five-branes, five-dimensional field theories and grid diagrams”, JHEP01, 002 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9710116

    1998 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Type IIA superstrings, chiral symmetry, and N=1 4-D gauge theory dualities

    J. H. Brodie and A. Hanany, “Type IIA superstrings, chiral symmetry, and N=1 4-D gauge theory dualities”, Nucl. Phys. B506, 157 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9704043

    1997 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Branes and supersymmetry breaking in three-dimensional gauge theories

    O. Bergman, A. Hanany, A. Karch, and B. Kol, “Branes and supersymmetry breaking in three-dimensional gauge theories”, JHEP10, 036 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9908075

    1999 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Branes and toric geometry

    N. C. Leung and C. Vafa, “Branes and toric geometry”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 91 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9711013

    1998 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Three-dimensional gauge dynamics from brane config- urations with (p,q)-fivebrane

    T. Kitao, K. Ohta, and N. Ohta, “Three-dimensional gauge dynamics from brane config- urations with (p,q)-fivebrane”, Nucl. Phys. B539, 79 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9808111

    1999 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Brane dynamics and N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory

    S. Elitzur, A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, E. Rabinovici, and A. Schwimmer, “Brane dynamics and N=1 supersymmetric gauge theory”, Nucl. Phys. B 505, 202 (1997), arXiv:hep - th/9704104

    1997

  42. [50]

    Brane dynamics and chiral nonchiral transitions

    I. Brunner, A. Hanany, A. Karch, and D. Lust, “Brane dynamics and chiral nonchiral transitions”, Nucl. Phys. B528, 197 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9801017

    1998 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions

    O. Aharony, A. Hanany, K. A. Intriligator, N. Seiberg, and M. J. Strassler, “Aspects of N=2 supersymmetric gauge theories in three-dimensions”, Nucl. Phys. B499, 67 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9703110

    1997 arXiv

  44. [52]

    The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z

    D. L. Jafferis, “The Exact Superconformal R-Symmetry Extremizes Z”, JHEP 05, 159 (2012), arXiv:1012.3210 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere

    D. L. Jafferis, I. R. Klebanov, S. S. Pufu, and B. R. Safdi, “Towards the F-Theorem: N=2 Field Theories on the Three-Sphere”, JHEP06, 102 (2011), arXiv:1103.1181 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  46. [54]

    N=2 Dualities and Z Extremization in Three Dimensions

    B. Willett and I. Yaakov, “N=2 Dualities and Z Extremization in Three Dimensions”, (2011), arXiv:1104.0487 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories

    C. Closset, T. T. Dumitrescu, G. Festuccia, Z. Komargodski, and N. Seiberg, “Contact Terms, Unitarity, and F-Maximization in Three-Dimensional Superconformal Theories”, JHEP 10, 053 (2012), arXiv:1205.4142 [hep-th]. 59

    2012 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Parity Violation and Gauge Noninvariance of the Effective Gauge Field Action in Three-Dimensions

    A. N. Redlich, “Parity Violation and Gauge Noninvariance of the Effective Gauge Field Action in Three-Dimensions”, Phys. Rev. D29, edited by F. Wilczek, 2366 (1984)

    1984

  49. [57]

    Localization on three-dimensional manifolds

    B. Willett, “Localization on three-dimensional manifolds”, J. Phys. A50, 443006 (2017), arXiv:1608.02958 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    D. Gaiotto and E. Witten, “S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory”, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.13, 721 (2009), arXiv:0807.3720 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Direct derivation of

    M. Honda, “Direct derivation of "mirror" ABJ partition function”, JHEP12, 046 (2013), arXiv:1310.3126 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Matrix models from operators and topological strings, 2

    R. Kashaev, M. Marino, and S. Zakany, “Matrix models from operators and topological strings, 2”, Annales Henri Poincare17, 2741 (2016), arXiv:1505.02243 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Nonperturbative Tests of Three-Dimensional Dualities

    A. Kapustin, B. Willett, and I. Yaakov, “Nonperturbative Tests of Three-Dimensional Dualities”, JHEP10, 013 (2010), arXiv:1003.5694 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  54. [62]

    3d mirror symmetry as a canonical transformation

    N. Drukker and J. Felix, “3d mirror symmetry as a canonical transformation”, JHEP05, 004 (2015), arXiv:1501.02268 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    From Necklace Quivers to the F-theorem, Operator Counting, and T(U(N))

    D. R. Gulotta, C. P. Herzog, and S. S. Pufu, “From Necklace Quivers to the F-theorem, Operator Counting, and T(U(N))”, JHEP12, 077 (2011), arXiv:1105.2817 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  56. [64]

    3d Partition Function as Overlap of Wave- functions

    T. Nishioka, Y. Tachikawa, and M. Yamazaki, “3d Partition Function as Overlap of Wave- functions”, JHEP08, 003 (2011), arXiv:1105.4390 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  57. [65]

    3D-partition functions on the sphere: exact evaluation and mirror symmetry

    S. Benvenuti and S. Pasquetti, “3D-partition functions on the sphere: exact evaluation and mirror symmetry”, JHEP05, 099 (2012), arXiv:1105.2551 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Hanany-Witten effect and SL(2,Z) dualities in matrix models

    B. Assel, “Hanany-Witten effect and SL(2,Z) dualities in matrix models”, JHEP10, 117 (2014), arXiv:1406.5194 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Curves and Super Chern-Simons Matrix Models

    N. Kubo, S. Moriyama, and T. Nosaka, “Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Curves and Super Chern-Simons Matrix Models”, JHEP01, 210 (2019), arXiv:1811.06048 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Matrix models from operators and topological strings

    M. Marino and S. Zakany, “Matrix models from operators and topological strings”, An- nales Henri Poincare17, 1075 (2016), arXiv:1502.02958 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  61. [69]

    The Partition Function of ABJ Theory

    H. Awata, S. Hirano, and M. Shigemori, “The Partition Function of ABJ Theory”, PTEP 2013, 053B04 (2013), arXiv:1212.2966 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Exact results on ABJ theory and the refined topological string

    M. Honda and K. Okuyama, “Exact results on ABJ theory and the refined topological string”, JHEP08, 148 (2014), arXiv:1405.3653 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Operators and higher genus mirror curves

    S. Codesido, J. Gu, and M. Marino, “Operators and higher genus mirror curves”, JHEP 02, 092 (2017), arXiv:1609.00708 [hep-th]. 60

    2017 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Large N expansion of mass deformed ABJM matrix model: M2-instanton condensation and beyond

    T. Nosaka, “Large N expansion of mass deformed ABJM matrix model: M2-instanton condensation and beyond”, JHEP03, 087 (2024), arXiv:2401.11484 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Tilings, Chern-Simons Theories and M2 Branes

    A. Hanany and A. Zaffaroni, “Tilings, Chern-Simons Theories and M2 Branes”, JHEP10, 111 (2008), arXiv:0808.1244 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories

    K. Ueda and M. Yamazaki, “Toric Calabi-Yau four-folds dual to Chern-Simons-matter theories”, JHEP12, 045 (2008), arXiv:0808.3768 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Quiver Chern-Simons theories and crystals

    Y. Imamura and K. Kimura, “Quiver Chern-Simons theories and crystals”, JHEP10, 114 (2008), arXiv:0808.4155 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  68. [76]

    ABJM Mirrors and a Duality of Dualities

    K. Jensen and A. Karch, “ABJM Mirrors and a Duality of Dualities”, JHEP 09, 004 (2009), arXiv:0906.3013 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  69. [77]

    3d dualities with decoupled sectors and brane transitions

    N. Kubo, “3d dualities with decoupled sectors and brane transitions”, JHEP 05, 080 (2022), arXiv:2112.07776 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Quantization of models with non-compact quantum group symmetry: Modular XXZ magnet and lattice sinh-Gordon model

    A. G. Bytsko and J. Teschner, “Quantization of models with non-compact quantum group symmetry: Modular XXZ magnet and lattice sinh-Gordon model”, J. Phys. A39, 12927 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0602093. 61

    2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.