Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 3 cited by

Loop corrections to the inflationary power spectrum can be renormalised by finite local counter-terms even when the background strongly breaks de Sitter symmetry; the resulting one-loop signal vanishes away from the feature's scales.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 18:19 UTC pith:TI2AFUP6

load-bearing objection Careful, well-executed one-loop EFT renormalization in feature backgrounds; the main results hold within the η2≫η and small-amplitude regime, but the abstract's background-independence claim outruns the proof. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2603.12216 v2 pith:TI2AFUP6 submitted 2026-03-12 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th

Scale-Dependent Loop Corrections to the Inflationary Power Spectrum

Matteo Braglia , Sebasti\'an C\'espedes , Lucas Pinol This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-th
keywords primordial power spectrumone-loop correctionseffective field theory of inflationrenormalisationprimordial featuresresonant featuressharp featurestadpoles
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that one-loop quantum corrections to the inflationary power spectrum remain under control in backgrounds that depart from near-de Sitter space, such as models with primordial features. Working in the EFT of inflation, it claims that all ultraviolet divergences and tadpoles—despite being strongly time- and scale-dependent—can be absorbed into a finite set of local counter-terms consistent with the EFT symmetries, provided modes start in an adiabatic Bunch-Davies phase. For a resonant feature the renormalised one-loop result is indistinguishable from the tree-level result up to parameter renormalisation; for a sharp feature it vanishes on both large and small scales, with specific power laws. If correct, this closes the EFT under loop corrections in feature models and removes a long-standing worry that small-scale amplification could contaminate CMB scales.

Core claim

The central claim is that the EFT of inflationary fluctuations closes under loops even with arbitrary time-dependent Wilson coefficients. The authors show that the UV-divergent part of the one-loop in-in integral is universal—fixed by the Bunch-Davies adiabatic tail of the mode functions—and can be cancelled at all times by counter-terms drawn from the existing EFT operator basis, including a curvature-squared-type operator usually assumed degenerate at tree level. Tadpole cancellation fixes the corresponding linear and quadratic counter-terms. In the small-amplitude limit, exact analytic results show: for resonant features, loop corrections preserve the discrete shift symmetry and only reno

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the quartic Goldstone interaction H_int^(4) = -(a^4/2) ϵ η η2 H^4 M_Pl^2 π²(π̇²/c_s² − (∂π)²/a²), which dominates the one-loop power spectrum under the hierarchy η2 ≫ η. Its UV singularities are regulated in dimensional regularisation; the divergent part is shown by a WKB expansion to arise only from the Bunch-Davies adiabatic tail of the mode functions, |π_k|² ~ 1/(2 z² c_s k) plus a universal k^-3 tail, making the pole coefficient background-independent. Cancellation is achieved by time-dependent counter-terms δ_i(τ) = C_i ϵ(τ)η(τ)η2(τ), with the minimal solution requiring the operator -\tilde M_1^3(τ) δK, which is degenerate at tree level but unavoidable at one

Load-bearing premise

The proof and the explicit results rest on the hierarchy η2 ≫ η and the small-amplitude limit A ≪ 1; if either fails, additional cubic diagrams and tadpole-derivative terms contribute and the perturbative treatment—and the vanishing of loop corrections—is no longer established.

What would settle it

Perform the same one-loop calculation for a sharp feature numerically without imposing η2 ≫ η, keeping cubic and quartic diagrams and the time derivatives of the tadpole momentum integrals that the paper neglects; if the renormalised spectrum develops a non-vanishing tail at p ≪ p0 or p ≫ p0, the centrality of the vanishing result would be refuted.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Feature models used to fit CMB residuals are perturbatively safe in the regime covered: resonant frequencies ω ≪ P0^(-1/2) and sharp-feature durations ΔN ≫ √P0, about 10^-5 for the observed amplitude P0 = 2.1 × 10^-9.
  • For resonant features, the renormalised one-loop spectrum has the same logarithmic oscillations as tree level; loop corrections cannot be distinguished from a redefinition of EFT parameters.
  • For sharp features, the loop correction genuinely shifts the spectrum's envelope and moves its peak to higher wave-numbers by a factor √3, a signature not absorbable at this order.
  • Individual divergent loop contributions cancel among themselves and against counter-terms; the total renormalised correction decays as (p/p0)^2 on large scales and (p/p0)^(1-n) on small scales.
  • Renormalisation requires counter-terms from EFT operators that are redundant at tree level, in particular the δK-type operator, meaning one-loop renormalisation fixes couplings that tree-level power spectra do not pin down.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same UV-universality argument suggests the cancellation extends beyond the two feature profiles studied, as long as the adiabatic Bunch-Davies assumption holds; a non-oscillatory transient with arbitrary slow-roll violation would be a direct test.
  • Because the loop correction vanishes at p ≪ p0 and p ≫ p0, sharp-feature models of primordial black holes or scalar-induced gravitational waves should not inherit one-loop contamination of large-scale CMB modes in the small-amplitude regime; whether this persists when η2 ≫ η fails is left unresolved.
  • The logarithmic terms in the renormalised spectrum suggest that real-space criteria, as the paper applies to sharp features, may give cleaner perturbativity bounds; applying the same real-space criterion to resonant features is a natural next step.
  • The authors note that tensor modes could acquire scale dependence at one loop; computing the tensor spectrum with this renormalisation scheme would test whether the standard consistency relation is modified in feature models.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a renormalisation procedure for the one-loop scalar power spectrum in the EFT of inflation with arbitrary time dependence of the Wilson coefficients. Under the hierarchy η2 ≫ η (Eq. 2.9), the quartic interaction (Eq. 2.10) dominates the one-loop two-point function, and the authors show that UV divergences and tadpoles are cancelled by a finite set of local counter-terms. They then apply the formalism to two concrete small-amplitude (A ≪ 1) models—resonant and sharp features—computing the fully renormalised one-loop power spectrum analytically using de Sitter mode functions. For sharp features they obtain the advertised result that the renormalised loop vanishes both at large and small scales (Eqs. 4.25–4.26), and they derive perturbativity bounds on the feature parameters.

Significance. If the advertised claims hold, this is an important step: it provides the first complete one-loop renormalisation in inflationary backgrounds with localised scale-dependent features, with explicit counter-term solutions and derived perturbativity bounds. The paper is careful and cross-checked: the tree-level in-in computation is validated against the numerical EOM result (Fig. 3), the large-n resummations are checked against the exact expressions (Fig. 4), and the asymptotics (4.25)–(4.26) are obtained from cancellations between individual divergent contributions. These are genuine strengths. The main caveat is that the general background-independence theorem is stated more broadly than the regime in which it is actually demonstrated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §5 final paragraph; fn. 4] The abstract claims that the cancellation of UV divergences and tadpoles by finite local counter-terms 'holds independently of the precise time dependence of the background and of the free-field mode functions'. The paper itself concedes, in the final paragraph of §5, that in strong ultra-slow-roll scenarios the hierarchy η≪η2 'may break down, so additional diagrams contribute', and fn. 4 neglects time-derivatives of the momentum integrals in δ̈Λ and δċ, noting these 'may play a role in more general scenarios'. Since the derivation of the quartic-dominated loop and of the vanishing large/small-scale behaviour explicitly relies on Eq. (2.9) and on de Sitter loop mode functions (Eq. 4.2), the abstract's background-independence claim is broader than the proven theorem. This is a load-bearing scope limitation and should be corrected by restricting the claims to the demonstrated regime.
  2. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.5)–(3.6); Appendix A, Eq. (A.12)] The general cancellation proof in §3.2 is not fully established for arbitrary backgrounds. The counter-term solution is written with constants C_i, δ_i(τ)=C_i ϵ(τ)η(τ)η2(τ). This is sufficient only if the UV-divergent factor [∫ d^{3+δ}k |π_k(τ1)|²]_{UV} in Eq. (3.3) is independent of τ1. However, the WKB expansion, Eq. (A.12), shows that the coefficient of the k^{-3} logarithmic term in |π_k|² involves z''/z^3, which is generically time-dependent when the background varies. The statement 'no particular time dependence of the slow-roll parameters is assumed' is therefore not justified by the equations as written. In the small-amplitude models of §4 the ϵ-dependence cancels at leading order in A, so the explicit computations are safe; but the general theorem needs either a proof valid for arbitrary time dependence or an explicit restriction to the small-amplitude/leading-order regime.
  3. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.10), (C.1); §5] The claim that in the resonant case the one-loop correction 'coincides with the tree-level result' and 'simply rescales the amplitude' is not literally what Eq. (4.10) shows. The log term ΔP_logs has a factor 2 ln(Λ_IR/p) multiplying the oscillatory function (Eq. C.1). This introduces a slow p-dependence that is not a constant rescaling, and it breaks the discrete scale invariance p→e^{2π/ω}p. The authors should explain how this term is absorbed into a renormalisation of EFT parameters compatible with the discrete symmetry, or qualify the 'indistinguishable' claim to account for this IR-log contribution.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2.20)] The free equation of motion is written with (∂π)^2/a^2, but the linearised EOM should contain ∂²π/a^2. This appears to be a typo, though the subsequent manipulation of π̈² follows the intended equation.
  2. [Eqs. (4.25)–(4.26)] The asymptotic statement ∝(p/p0)^{1-n} assumes n>1. For n=1 the feature is not localised in the sense used later; please state explicitly n≥2 in the sharp-feature setup.
  3. [Fig. 2, lower-right panel] The two strong-coupling criteria are presented in the same panel without visually distinguishing which curve corresponds to Eq. (4.28) and which to Eq. (4.33). Adding labels would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the derivation is self-contained within its stated EFT assumptions; counter-terms are fixed by renormalization conditions, not by the results they later predict.

full rationale

The paper's chain of derivation does not reduce any central prediction to an input by definition. The finite set of counter-terms in Eqs. (3.5)-(3.6) is fixed by the renormalization conditions that UV poles and tadpoles cancel, not by fitting the final power-spectrum shapes. The divergence structure is derived from the adiabatic WKB expansion in Appendix A, and the specific counter-term profile proportional to epsilon eta eta2 follows from the background dependence of the interaction, not from an assumed form of the loop result. The sharp-feature large/small-scale vanishing in Eqs. (4.25)-(4.26) is obtained by explicit integrals and algebraic cancellation between bare and counter-term contributions; the paper even isolates the individually divergent terms that cancel in the sum. The resonant loop result (4.10)-(4.12) has a tree-level-like scale dependence imposed by the residual discrete symmetry, but the amplitude and phase are computed, not inserted. The perturbativity bounds such as omega << P0^{-1/2} and Delta N >> P0^{1/2} use the observed P0 = A_s = 2.1e-9 only as an external numerical input, and the bounds are derived from the ratio of computed loop and tree amplitudes. Reliance on the authors' earlier work [5,6] is visible in the use of in-in machinery and the slow-roll radiative-stability result, but those references are external, checkable derivations used to set up the present calculation rather than to prove the new scale-dependent counter-term theorem. The paper's own qualifications, such as the eta << eta2 hierarchy in Eq. (2.9) and the footnote-4 neglect of time-derivatives of tadpole integrals, are genuine scope limitations: they narrow the regime in which the conclusions are proven, but they do not make any equation equivalent to its input. No circular step can be exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

8 free parameters · 10 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central computation rests on three pillars: (i) the standard EFT-of-inflation operator basis and in-in machinery (assumptions 1–3, 9–10); (ii) the regime choice η2 ≫ η with small feature amplitude A ≪ 1, which selects the quartic operator (2.10) as the sole one-loop source and fixes the de Sitter loop mode functions (assumptions 4, 7); and (iii) the adiabatic/Bunch-Davies UV condition that fixes the universal divergence structure (assumption 6). The counter-terms (Eqs. 3.5–3.6) contain no free parameters: they are fixed by the demand that UV poles and tadpoles cancel. The main uncompensated inputs are the model parameters (A, ω, n, p0) and the uninterpreted IR regulator Λ_IR. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (8)
  • A_res (resonant feature amplitude) = expansion parameter; unspecified numerical value, ≪ 1
    Controls Δϵ/ϵ0 = A_res sin(ω ln(−τ/τ_res)) in Eq. (4.5); all tree and loop results are exact only to first order in A_res (§4).
  • A_sharp (sharp feature amplitude) = expansion parameter; unspecified, ≪ 1
    Amplitude of the sharp feature profile Eq. (4.14); results at leading order in A_sharp (Eqs. 4.17, 4.22).
  • ω (resonant dimensionless frequency) = model input; derived perturbativity bound ω ≪ A_s^{-1/2} ≈ 2×10^4
    Frequency of the ln(−τ) oscillation Eq. (4.5); sets the discrete scale-invariance group τ→e^{2πn/ω}τ (Eq. 4.6) that controls the loop structure; strong-coupling bound Eq. (4.13).
  • n (sharp-feature exponent) = model input; derived perturbativity bound ΔN ≫ 10^-5
    Sharpness parameter in Eq. (4.14) with ΔN = sqrt(π/2n) (Eq. 4.16); controls the vanishing tails x^{1-n} and the strong-coupling bounds Eqs. (4.28), (4.33).
  • p_res = −1/τ_res and p0 = −1/τ0 (feature scales) = model inputs; set the scale of the features
    Reference scales of the resonant and sharp features; all scale dependence is expressed in x = c_s p/p_res or c_s p/p0. Not fitted to the loop results.
  • Λ_IR (comoving IR cut-off) = free regulator
    Regulates IR divergences; final spectra retain ln(Λ_IR/p) terms whose physical interpretation is deferred (§3.1, §5).
  • µ (dimensional-regularization scale) = free; removed by setting µ ∝ H
    Renormalization scale appearing in ln(H/µ) logs; the authors set µ ∝ H to remove it from observables (§5).
  • P0 = A_s = 2.1×10^-9 (observed scalar amplitude) = 2.1 × 10^-9
    Observational input used to evaluate the perturbativity bounds numerically (Eq. 4.13 and §4.2); not fitted in the derivation.
axioms (10)
  • domain assumption Single-clock EFT symmetry pattern: spatial diffeomorphisms preserved, time diffeomorphisms spontaneously broken and non-linearly realised by π.
    Defines the EFT operator basis (Eq. 2.2) and hence the counter-term set (Eq. 2.14); excludes multifield standard-clock models (§1, §2.1).
  • domain assumption Decoupling limit M_Pl→∞, Ḣ→0 with M_Pl²Ḣ = const (Eq. 2.1): gravitational fluctuations decouple; π dynamics only.
    Used throughout for the interaction Hamiltonians (Eqs. 2.7–2.10) and the π→ζ relation (Eq. 2.26).
  • domain assumption Gravitational floor: M_{n≥3} = 0 and c_s ~ 1 slowly varying.
    Restricts to unavoidable gravitational interactions; speed-of-sound dependence retained but assumed slowly varying (§2.1).
  • ad hoc to paper Hierarchy η2 ≫ η (Eq. 2.9): the second slow-roll parameter dominates, so quartic ∝ ϵηη2 dominates cubic ∝ ϵη at one loop.
    Load-bearing: justifies keeping only Eq. (2.10) at loop order and dropping cubic-loop contributions from the power spectrum. Breaks in strong-USR scenarios, as conceded in the final paragraph of §5.
  • domain assumption EFT validity E_var ≪ Λ_EFT (Eq. 2.4) and slow variation of Wilson coefficients below the cutoff.
    Ensures the time dependence of couplings does not excite integrated-out UV modes; used in the perturbativity discussion (§2.1, §4).
  • domain assumption Existence of an adiabatic phase continuously connected to the Bunch-Davies vacuum, with (c_s k τ)² ≫ 1 where the background 'resembles de Sitter' (App. A, Eq. A.15).
    Needed to fix the universally divergent k^{-3} tail via WKB (Eqs. A.11–A.12) and to make the extra log-divergence candidates vanish (Eq. A.15). This is the stated precondition of the main renormalizability claim.
  • domain assumption Small feature amplitude A ≪ 1 allowing linear perturbation theory in Δϵ and de Sitter mode functions (Eqs. 4.2–4.4) for the loop integrals.
    All exact loop results (Eqs. 4.10, 4.22) are at leading order in A; tree-level validity checked against the EOM (Fig. 3); loop level not independently checked.
  • ad hoc to paper Tadpole-induced quadratic counter-terms: time-derivatives of the momentum integrals in δ̈Λ and δċ are neglected (fn. 4).
    Stated to be exact for the de Sitter mode functions used in the examples, but 'may play a role in more general scenarios' — a caveat on the claimed background-independence.
  • standard math Dimensional regularization in minimal subtraction: only logarithmic divergences appear as 1/δ poles; power divergences set to zero (App. A).
    Standard scheme; used to isolate the divergence structure (Eq. A.10).
  • standard math In-in operator formalism: total-time-derivative terms and EOM-proportional operators do not contribute to correlators and are discarded (Eqs. 2.18–2.22).
    Standard in-in technology; the authors' framework [31] is cited for the discard rules.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 29519 in / 21750 out tokens · 188809 ms · 2026-08-02T18:19:49.107605+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Loop corrections to primordial correlation functions are unavoidable due to the non-linear nature of gravity. Previous works have established a robust framework for computing the renormalised one-loop power spectra of scalar and tensor modes, but primarily in (near) de Sitter backgrounds. In this work, we develop a consistent renormalisation procedure applicable to inflationary backgrounds that strongly break de Sitter symmetries and generate scale-dependent features in the primordial spectra. Our analysis is performed within the Effective Field Theory (EFT) of inflationary fluctuations, allowing for arbitrary time dependence of the Wilson coefficients. We show that both ultraviolet divergences and tadpoles of the theory, despite their strong time and scale dependence, can be cancelled by a finite set of local counter-terms compatible with the EFT symmetries. Importantly, this result only relies on the existence of an initial phase of adiabatic evolution continuously related to the Bunch-Davies vacuum and holds independently of the precise time dependence of the background and of the free-field mode functions. We then study two concrete realisations, corresponding to resonant and sharp features. In both cases, all calculations are carried out exactly in the limit of small feature amplitude. We analyse perturbativity and provide the first explicit demonstration that the renormalised one-loop power spectrum generated by a localised feature along the inflationary trajectory vanishes both at large and small scales. Our scale-dependent renormalisation framework implies that models of primordial features used to fit CMB residuals are consistent with perturbativity bounds, and opens the door to systematic studies of loop corrections in more complicated scenarios relevant for scalar-induced gravitational waves and primordial black holes.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Background-independent one-loop renormalization of tensor and scalar primordial spectra

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    UV divergences of one-loop primordial tensor and scalar spectra are absorbed by covariant and tadpole counterterms using only the universal WKB expansion of internal modes, yielding finite model-independent renormaliz...

  2. Cancellation of one-loop time dependence in superhorizon curvature perturbations from all scales

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    One-loop time dependence in superhorizon curvature perturbations cancels when all-scale contributions and boundary terms are included consistently via the δN formalism.

  3. Fixing the Renormalization of Inflationary Loops via Ward Identities

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Ward identities from large gauge symmetry impose model-independent constraints on renormalizing inflationary loops and non-perturbatively govern the infrared power spectrum evolution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 75 linked inside Pith · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 043514 [hep-th/0506236]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations

    S. Weinberg,Quantum contributions to cosmological correlations. II. Can these corrections become large?,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 023508 [hep-th/0605244]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  3. [3]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,The constancy ofζin single-clock Inflation at all loops, JHEP09(2013) 148 [1210.6048]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  4. [4]

    Assassi, D

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann and D. Green,Symmetries and Loops in Inflation,JHEP02(2013) 151 [1210.7792]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Braglia and L

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol,One-loop renormalization of the effective field theory of inflationary fluctuations from gravitational interactions,2504.07926

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    Braglia and L

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol,Freezing of the renormalized one-loop primordial scalar power spectrum,2504.13136. – 33 – 10−1 100 101 −pτ 103 104 105 106 ∆ P 1−loop res (p, x)/AresP 2 0 pres = Mpc−1, ω= 20, cs = 1 p = pmax res p = pmax res eπ/2ω p = pmax res eπ/ω −pτ = ω/2 10−1 100 101 −pτ 101 102 103 104 105 ∆ P 1−loop sharp (p, x)/AsharpP 2 0 p0 = Mpc−1, cs = ...

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Creminelli, M

    P. Creminelli, M. A. Luty, A. Nicolis and L. Senatore,Starting the Universe: Stable Violation of the Null Energy Condition and Non-standard Cosmologies,JHEP12(2006) 080 [hep-th/0606090]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Cheung, P

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore,The Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JHEP03(2008) 014 [0709.0293]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  9. [9]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,On Loops in Inflation,JHEP12(2010) 008 [0912.2734]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  10. [10]

    Marolf and I

    D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison,The IR stability of de Sitter: Loop corrections to scalar propagators,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 105032 [1006.0035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [11]

    Senatore and M

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,On Loops in Inflation II: IR Effects in Single Clock Inflation,JHEP01(2013) 109 [1203.6354]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  12. [12]

    Premkumar,Regulating loops in de Sitter spacetime,Phys

    A. Premkumar,Regulating loops in de Sitter spacetime,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 045003 [2110.12504]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Xianyu and H

    Z.-Z. Xianyu and H. Zhang,Bootstrapping one-loop inflation correlators with the spectral decomposition,JHEP04(2023) 103 [2211.03810]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Qin and Z.-Z

    Z. Qin and Z.-Z. Xianyu,Inflation correlators at the one-loop order: nonanalyticity, factorization, cutting rule, and OPE,JHEP09(2023) 116 [2304.13295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Qin,Cosmological correlators at the loop level,JHEP03(2025) 051 [2411.13636]

    Z. Qin,Cosmological correlators at the loop level,JHEP03(2025) 051 [2411.13636]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. Gamb ´ ın Egea and F. Riccardi,Finite parts of inflationary loops,JHEP06 (2025) 098 [2411.19674]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Cespedes and S

    S. Cespedes and S. Jazayeri,The massive flat space limit of cosmological correlators,JHEP 07(2025) 032 [2501.02119]

    arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Cespedes, Z

    S. Cespedes, Z. Qin and D.-G. Wang,λϕ 4˜as an Effective Theory in de Sitter,2510.25826. – 34 –

    arXiv

  19. [19]

    Ballesteros, J

    G. Ballesteros, J. G. Egea and F. Riccardi,Finite parts of inflationary loops II: A streamlined UV in-in algorithm and distinguishable signatures,2512.20467

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    G. L. Pimentel and T. Westerdijk,On Cosmological Correlators at One Loop,2601.00952

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    Y. Ema, M. Hong, R. Jinno and K. Mukaida,Cancellation of loop corrections to soft scalar power spectrum,2603.01961

    arXiv

  22. [22]

    Farren, C

    A. Farren, C. McCulloch, E. Pajer and X. Tong,All-Loop Renormalization and the Phase of the de Sitter Wavefunction,2603.08794

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    Chen,Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inflation Models,Adv

    X. Chen,Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Inflation Models,Adv. Astron.2010(2010) 638979 [1002.1416]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Ach´ ucarro et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,2203.08128

    A. Ach´ ucarro et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,2203.08128. [25]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  25. [26]

    X. Chen, M. H. Namjoo and Y. Wang,Models of the Primordial Standard Clock,JCAP02 (2015) 027 [1411.2349]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  26. [27]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D. K. Hazra,Comparing multi-field primordial feature models with the Planck data,JCAP06(2021) 005 [2103.03025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  27. [28]

    Pinol,Effective field theory of multifield inflationary fluctuations,Phys

    L. Pinol,Effective field theory of multifield inflationary fluctuations,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) L041302 [2405.02190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    Ballesteros, S

    G. Ballesteros, S. C´ espedes and L. Santoni,Large power spectrum and primordial black holes in the effective theory of inflation,JHEP01(2022) 074 [2109.00567]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [30]

    Carrillo Gonz´ alez and S

    M. Carrillo Gonz´ alez and S. C´ espedes,Causality bounds on the primordial power spectrum, JCAP08(2025) 071 [2502.19477]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [31]

    Braglia and L

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol,No time to derive: unraveling total time derivatives in in-in perturbation theory,JHEP08(2024) 068 [2403.14558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [32]

    Urakawa and T

    Y. Urakawa and T. Tanaka,IR divergence does not affect the gauge-invariant curvature perturbation,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 121301 [1007.0468]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  32. [33]

    Urakawa and T

    Y. Urakawa and T. Tanaka,Natural selection of inflationary vacuum required by infra-red regularity and gauge-invariance,Prog. Theor. Phys.125(2011) 1067 [1009.2947]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  33. [34]

    S. B. Giddings and M. S. Sloth,Semiclassical relations and IR effects in de Sitter and slow-roll space-times,JCAP01(2011) 023 [1005.1056]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [35]

    Gerstenlauer, A

    M. Gerstenlauer, A. Hebecker and G. Tasinato,Inflationary Correlation Functions without Infrared Divergences,JCAP06(2011) 021 [1102.0560]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  35. [36]

    Tanaka and Y

    T. Tanaka and Y. Urakawa,Dominance of gauge artifact in the consistency relation for the primordial bispectrum,JCAP05(2011) 014 [1103.1251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  36. [37]

    Pajer, F

    E. Pajer, F. Schmidt and M. Zaldarriaga,The Observed Squeezed Limit of Cosmological Three-Point Functions,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 083502 [1305.0824]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  37. [38]

    Seery,Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions,Class

    D. Seery,Infrared effects in inflationary correlation functions,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 124005 [1005.1649]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [39]

    Noumi, M

    T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi and D. Yokoyama,Effective field theory approach to quasi-single field inflation and effects of heavy fields,JHEP06(2013) 051 [1211.1624]. – 35 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  39. [40]

    G. L. Pimentel, L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga,On Loops in Inflation III: Time Independence of zeta in Single Clock Inflation,JHEP07(2012) 166 [1203.6651]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  40. [41]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, D. K. Hazra and L. Pinol,Back to the features: assessing the discriminating power of future CMB missions on inflationary models,JCAP03(2023) 014 [2210.07028]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [42]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E. A. Lim,Generation and Characterization of Large Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation,JCAP04(2008) 010 [0801.3295]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  42. [43]

    Flauger, L

    R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal and G. Xu,Oscillations in the CMB from Axion Monodromy Inflation,JCAP06(2010) 009 [0907.2916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  43. [44]

    Flauger and E

    R. Flauger and E. Pajer,Resonant Non-Gaussianity,JCAP01(2011) 017 [1002.0833]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [45]

    McAllister, E

    L. McAllister, E. Silverstein and A. Westphal,Gravity Waves and Linear Inflation from Axion Monodromy,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 046003 [0808.0706]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  45. [46]

    Chen,Folded Resonant Non-Gaussianity in General Single Field Inflation,JCAP12 (2010) 003 [1008.2485]

    X. Chen,Folded Resonant Non-Gaussianity in General Single Field Inflation,JCAP12 (2010) 003 [1008.2485]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  46. [47]

    S. R. Behbahani, A. Dymarsky, M. Mirbabayi and L. Senatore,(Small) Resonant non-Gaussianities: Signatures of a Discrete Shift Symmetry in the Effective Field Theory of Inflation,JCAP12(2012) 036 [1111.3373]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  47. [48]

    X. Chen, M. H. Namjoo and Y. Wang,On the equation-of-motion versus in-in approach in cosmological perturbation theory,JCAP01(2016) 022 [1505.03955]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [49]

    Cespedes, V

    S. Cespedes, V. Atal and G. A. Palma,On the importance of heavy fields during inflation, JCAP05(2012) 008 [1201.4848]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [50]

    Bartolo, D

    N. Bartolo, D. Cannone and S. Matarrese,The Effective Field Theory of Inflation Models with Sharp Features,JCAP10(2013) 038 [1307.3483]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [51]

    Cannone, N

    D. Cannone, N. Bartolo and S. Matarrese,Perturbative Unitarity of Inflationary Models with Features,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 127301 [1402.2258]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [52]

    Cheng, D.-S

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee and K.-W. Ng,Power spectrum of primordial perturbations during ultra-slow-roll inflation with back reaction effects,Phys. Lett. B827(2022) 136956 [2106.09275]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [53]

    Inomata, M

    K. Inomata, M. Braglia and X. Chen,Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case,2211.02586

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  53. [54]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama,Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 221003 [2211.03395]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [55]

    Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out,2301.00599

    A. Riotto,The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out,2301.00599

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [56]

    Firouzjahi,One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation,JCAP10 (2023) 006 [2303.12025]

    H. Firouzjahi,One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation,JCAP10 (2023) 006 [2303.12025]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [57]

    Choudhury, M

    S. Choudhury, M. R. Gangopadhyay and M. Sami,No-go for the formation of heavy mass Primordial Black Holes in Single Field Inflation,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 884 [2301.10000]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  57. [58]

    Motohashi and Y

    H. Motohashi and Y. Tada,Squeezed bispectrum and one-loop corrections in transient constant-roll inflation,JCAP08(2023) 069 [2303.16035]. – 36 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  58. [59]

    Franciolini, A

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Perturbativity in the presence of ultraslow-roll dynamics,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 123550 [2305.03491]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  59. [60]

    Tasinato,A large|η|approach to single field inflation,2305.11568

    G. Tasinato,A large|η|approach to single field inflation,2305.11568

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [61]

    Cheng, D.-S

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee and K.-W. Ng,Primordial perturbations from ultra-slow-roll single-field inflation with quantum loop effects,JCAP03(2024) 008 [2305.16810]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [62]

    Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics,2305.19263

    J. Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics,2305.19263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    Maity, H

    S. Maity, H. V. Ragavendra, S. K. Sethi and L. Sriramkumar,Loop contributions to the scalar power spectrum due to quartic order action in ultra slow roll inflation,JCAP05 (2024) 046 [2307.13636]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  63. [64]

    M. W. Davies, L. Iacconi and D. J. Mulryne,Numerical 1-loop correction from a potential yielding ultra-slow-roll dynamics,JCAP04(2024) 050 [2312.05694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  64. [65]

    Y. Tada, T. Terada and J. Tokuda,Cancellation of quantum corrections on the soft curvature perturbations,JHEP01(2024) 105 [2308.04732]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  65. [66]

    Iacconi, D

    L. Iacconi, D. Mulryne and D. Seery,Loop corrections in the separate universe picture,JCAP 06(2024) 062 [2312.12424]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  66. [67]

    Inomata,Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections,Phys

    K. Inomata,Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 141001 [2403.04682]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  67. [68]

    Firouzjahi,Loop corrections in the bispectrum in ultraslow-roll inflation with PBHs formation,Phys

    H. Firouzjahi,Loop corrections in the bispectrum in ultraslow-roll inflation with PBHs formation,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 043519 [2403.03841]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [69]

    Caravano, K

    A. Caravano, K. Inomata and S. Renaux-Petel,Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Nonperturbative Dynamics from Small-Scale Features,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 151001 [2403.12811]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  69. [70]

    Ballesteros and J

    G. Ballesteros and J. G. Egea,One-loop power spectrum in ultra slow-roll inflation and implications for primordial black hole dark matter,JCAP07(2024) 052 [2404.07196]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  70. [71]

    Kristiano and J

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama,Comparing sharp and smooth transitions of the second slow-roll parameter in single-field inflation,JCAP10(2024) 036 [2405.12145]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  71. [72]

    Kawaguchi, S

    R. Kawaguchi, S. Tsujikawa and Y. Yamada,Proving the absence of large one-loop corrections to the power spectrum of curvature perturbations in transient ultra-slow-roll inflation within the path-integral approach,JHEP12(2024) 095 [2407.19742]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  72. [73]

    Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics

    J. Fumagalli,Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics. Part 2. Quartic interactions and consistency relations,JHEP01(2025) 108 [2408.08296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  73. [74]

    Caravano, G

    A. Caravano, G. Franciolini and S. Renaux-Petel,Ultraslow-roll inflation on the lattice: Backreaction and nonlinear effects,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 063518 [2410.23942]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  74. [75]

    J. A. Ruiz and J. Rey,Gravitational waves in ultra-slow-roll and their anisotropy at two loops,2410.09014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [76]

    Firouzjahi,Two-Loop Corrections in Power Spectrum in Models of Inflation with Primordial Black Hole Formation,Universe10(2024) 456 [2411.10253]

    H. Firouzjahi,Two-Loop Corrections in Power Spectrum in Models of Inflation with Primordial Black Hole Formation,Universe10(2024) 456 [2411.10253]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [77]

    Sheikhahmadi and A

    H. Sheikhahmadi and A. Nassiri-Rad,Renormalized one-Loop Corrections in Power Spectrum in USR Inflation,2411.18525. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [78]

    Inomata,Conservation of superhorizon curvature perturbations at one loop: Backreaction in the in-in formalism and Renormalization,2502.08707

    K. Inomata,Conservation of superhorizon curvature perturbations at one loop: Backreaction in the in-in formalism and Renormalization,2502.08707

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  78. [79]

    Fang, Z.-H

    C.-J. Fang, Z.-H. Lyu, C. Chen and Z.-K. Guo,Incorporating Backreaction in One-Loop Corrections in Ultra-Slow-Roll Inflation,2502.09555

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  79. [80]

    Firouzjahi and B

    H. Firouzjahi and B. Nikbakht,Non-Perturbative Hamiltonian and Higher Loop Corrections in USR Inflation,2502.09481

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [81]

    Firouzjahi and B

    H. Firouzjahi and B. Nikbakht,Hamiltonians to all Orders in Perturbation Theory and Higher Loop Corrections in Single Field Inflation with PBHs Formation,2502.10287

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.