Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Scale-dependent bias and mode coupling in redshift-space clustering near the BAO scale

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Adding scale-dependent bias and mode coupling to the Zel'dovich-smearing model reproduces the BAO-scale redshift-space multipoles of halo clustering in 20 N-body simulations, with $\chi^2/\mathrm{dof} = 118.7/98$

desk verdict A solid, honest extension of PS23 that validates a new bias and mode-coupling model against two simulation suites, but the scale-dependent bias truncation is uncontrolled at the best-fit parameters and needs more justification before the model can be used for DESI-era inference. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.08082 v2 pith:TQXUQSCS submitted 2025-06-09 astro-ph.CO

Aseem Paranjape (IUCAA) , Ravi K. Sheth (UPenn/ICTP) This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords baryonacousticoscillationsredshift-spaceclusteringscale-dependentbiasmodecouplingZel'dovichapproximationpeakstheorytwo-pointcorrelationfunctionmultipolesmodel-agnosticBAOinference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper extends a model-agnostic (cosmology-independent), Zel'dovich-based description of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in redshift space to include two nonlinear effects: scale-dependent Lagrangian density and velocity bias, and mode coupling. It claims that the resulting “sdbmc” model accurately describes the monopole, quadrupole, and hexadecapole (the $\ell=0,2,4$ angular moments) of the two-point correlation function at separations $55 < s/(h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}) < 125$ for a realistic halo sample in 20 N-body simulation realisations, with $\chi^2/\mathrm{dof} = 118.7/98$. The practical motivation is that ongoing spectroscopic surveys will need these effects modelled if BAO-based cosmological inference is to remain unbiased. The paper also finds that scale-dependent bias matters more than mode coupling near the BAO scale, and that the mode-coupling smearing scale can be set equal to the linear velocity dispersion $\sigma_v$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the ansatz of equation (2.17), $\xi_{\rm NL}(s) = \int d^3s'\,\xi_L(s'|0)\,\mathcal{N}(s-s';\Sigma) + A_{\rm MC}\,\partial\xi_L(s|R_{\rm MC})/\partial\ln s$, in which the first term is the Zel'dovich-smeared propagator with an anisotropic Gaussian kernel of variances $2\sigma_v^2(1+f)^2$ along the line of sight and $2\sigma_v^2$ across it, and the second term is the mode-coupling piece written as a constant times the logarithmic derivative of a separately smeared linear correlation function. Scale-dependent bias enters through the factor $B(k,\mu_k)$ built from $b_{\rm Lag}(k) = (b_{-1}+b_{01}k^2R_p^2)e^{-k^2R_*^2/2}$ and $b_{\rm vel}(k) = (1-B_v k^2 R_p^2)e^{-k^2 R_*^2/2}$, motivated by peaks theory. These are Laplace-Gauss expansions, meaning sums of powers of $k^2$ multiplying Gaussian factors $e^{-k^2\sigma^2}$, which is what makes the model straightforward to incorporate in the existing model-agnostic BAO inference framework.

What would settle it

A decisive check would be to measure the residual between the full nonlinear correlation function and the Zel'dovich-smeared propagator in an N-body simulation and test whether it is proportional to $d\xi_L/d\ln s$ with a single constant over $55 < s/(h^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}) < 125$; if the ratio is scale-dependent, or if a quadrupole appears in the residual, the mode-coupling ansatz of equation (2.17) fails and the fitted $A_{\rm MC}$ and $R_{\rm MC}$ are absorbing other nonlinear effects.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a simple extension of the earlier Zel'dovich-smearing model --- equations (2.14) and (2.15) for scale-dependent Lagrangian density and velocity bias plus a mode-coupling term proportional to $d\xi_L/d\ln s$ --- captures the BAO-scale multipoles of biased tracers in redshift space. Fitting four parameters ($B_1$, $B_v$, $A_{\rm MC}$, $R_{\rm MC}$) with the large-scale bias and the smoothing scale fixed, the model matches the configuration-space multipoles measured in the N-body simulations with $\chi^2/\mathrm{dof} = 118.7/98$ ($p = 0.082$), and it also describes Fourier-space multipoles below $k = 0.13\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ in a second simulation suite. The simpler no-sdbmc model is disfavored by $\Delta\chi^2 \sim 33$, with $A_{\rm MC}=0$ excluded at better than 95% confidence and $B_v=0$ at better than 99%. The model predicts a narrower BAO peak shifted to smaller separations and a larger quadrupole variation than the no-sdbmc case.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the mode-coupling contribution is proportional to the logarithmic derivative of the linear correlation function with a constant amplitude and an isotropic Gaussian smearing scale; if the true volume-integral prefactor is not flat across the BAO scale, or if anisotropic smearing matters, the fitted $A_{\rm MC}$ and $R_{\rm MC}$ would absorb the mismatch and the claimed accuracy would not be a genuine test of the model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Ongoing spectroscopic surveys will need to include scale-dependent density and velocity bias in BAO modelling; the paper argues that ignoring it degrades the fit and biases the recovered large-scale bias $b$ and, through degeneracies, parameters such as the growth rate $f$ and $\sigma_8$.
  • The mode-coupling smearing scale $R_{\rm MC}$ can be fixed to $\sigma_v$, reducing the number of free parameters in future model-agnostic fits.
  • Mode coupling contributes only a small fraction of the difference from the simpler model, so retaining a positive-amplitude term of this form matters more than modelling its details.
  • The model remains accurate in Fourier space below $k = 0.13\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, providing a complementary regime for testing the same physics.
  • Because the model's predictions can be computed for arbitrary linear power spectra, it is agnostic to the cosmological model and can be applied beyond the reference cosmology used for validation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct follow-up test would be to fit the same model to narrow halo-mass bins: the significantly negative $B_v$ found for the mass-thresholded sample suggests that mass averaging reverses the sign of the velocity-bias coefficient relative to single-mass peaks-theory predictions, and narrow bins would show whether the scale dependence is physical or an absorbing nuisance.
  • If the equality $R_{\rm MC} = \sigma_v$ holds beyond the tested cases, the mode-coupling term is not an independent physical ingredient but a derivative of the propagator, so BAO analyses could drop it as a nuisance parameter and absorb it into the smearing kernel.
  • The Galilean-invariance argument cited for the dominant dipole mode-coupling term points to a possible gravity test: theories that preserve the relation between displacement and density would keep this term unchanged, so the shape of the BAO feature could distinguish modified gravity from the standard model even where isotropic smearing looks the same; the paper does not pursue this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends the Zel'dovich-smearing model of PS23 by adding scale-dependent Lagrangian density and velocity bias plus a mode-coupling term, yielding the 'sdbmc' model for redshift-space multipoles of the 2-point correlation function. The model is validated against configuration-space multipoles from 20 HADES simulations at z=0 for a mass-threshold halo sample in the range 55-125 Mpc/h (chi2/dof = 118.7/98, p = 0.082) and against Fourier-space multipoles from the MINERVA simulations at z=0.57 (chi2/dof = 41.55/35). The authors find that scale-dependent bias is the dominant new ingredient (Delta chi2 ~ 33 relative to no-sdbmc), while mode coupling is subdominant but nonzero, and they argue the model is suitable for model-agnostic BAO inference in surveys like DESI.

Significance. If the model holds, it provides a practical, few-parameter extension of the Laplace-Gauss class of BAO templates that can incorporate scale-dependent bias and mode coupling without assuming a specific cosmology. The paper's strengths are its validation on two independent simulation suites, its systematic exploration of model variations, and the explicit appendix testing the mode-coupling approximation. The HADES constraint R_MC = 5.2 h^-1 Mpc being consistent with sigma_v = 6.0 h^-1 Mpc is a useful internal consistency check. The principal weakness is that the scale-dependent velocity-bias expansion is truncated at O(k^2) while the best-fit coefficient is so large that the truncation is not controlled in the k-range relevant for the BAO integrals; this limits the physical interpretation of the fit and its safe extrapolation to other tracers and redshifts.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.2, Eq. (2.16); Table 1] The scale-dependent bias model truncates the peaks-theory-inspired expansion at O(k^2 R_p^2), but the best fit Bv = -14.3 with R_p = 2.5 h^-1 Mpc makes the factor (1 - Bv k^2 R_p^2) equal to roughly 1.14 at k = 0.04 h/Mpc and 1.89 at k = 0.1 h/Mpc, i.e. a 14-89% admixture of the next-order term in the k-range that dominates BAO-scale configuration-space integrals. The omitted O(k^4 R_p^4) terms are therefore not guaranteed small, and the paper provides no convergence test (e.g., a fit including a k^4 term) and no independent check of Bv. Since scale-dependent bias is the main new effect driving the improvement over the no-sdbmc model, the central claim that the model captures the physical scale-dependent bias relevant for DESI needs either a demonstration that higher-order terms are negligible or an explicit reframing of Bv as a purely empirical parameter whose extrapolation to other tracers is not yet justified.
  2. [§2.3, Eq. (2.17); Appendix B] The mode-coupling ansatz is presented as following from a product of a logarithmic derivative with a relatively flat volume integral, but the numerical test in Appendix B (Figure 5) is performed for a lognormal Lagrangian bias model with b10 = 1 and does not cover the regime of the large negative Bv found in the HADES fit. Because the mode-coupling contribution to the final chi^2 is small, this does not invalidate the quality of the fit, but the claim that the treatment of mode coupling is 'rather general' is stronger than what is demonstrated. The authors should either soften that claim or test the approximation in the fitted parameter regime, especially if the model is to be used for DESI-scale inference.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.2.2] The phrase 'model coupling' appears where 'mode coupling' is meant; please correct this typo.
  2. [References] Reference [7] has a malformed journal identifier ('a (p)' instead of a proper journal name); similar issues appear in other bibliographic entries (e.g., [11], [12]).
  3. [§3.2] The covariance matrix is constructed by scaling the Gauss-Poisson covariance to match the diagonal simulation errors while keeping the correlation structure, and the model used in the covariance is itself updated from a preliminary fit. Please report how sensitive the reported chi^2/dof and parameter errors are to this scaling and to the choice of setting AMC = R_MC = 0 in the covariance calculation.
  4. [§4.1] The paper says the no-sdbmc model is excluded by Delta chi^2 ~ 33, but the no-sdbmc model has b fixed to the best-fit value from the sdbmc analysis; specifying how chi^2 changes when b is refit for the no-sdbmc model would make the comparison cleaner.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: sdbmc parameters are fit to external simulation multipoles; the central accuracy claim is a model validation rather than a prediction derived from its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the sdbmc model, whose parameters {B1, Bv, AMC, RMC, R*} are explicitly fitted to HADES/MINERVA multipole measurements, accurately reproduces those measurements with chi^2/dof=118.7/98. This is a model-validation exercise against external simulation data, not a prediction derived from the fitted quantities. The propagator term (Eq. 2.22) is the standard Zel'dovich-smearing expression combined with an appended scale-dependent bias ansatz (Eq. 2.16), and the mode-coupling term (Eqs. 2.17, 2.21) is admittedly an approximate ansatz, with AMC and RMC free parameters (Sec. 2.3). No parameter is defined in terms of the target multipoles, and no 'predicted' quantity is statistically forced by an earlier fit. The paper's use of PS23 (Ref. [24], same authors) supplies the baseline model and the Laplace-Gauss language, but the new validation is independent of those citations because the simulations and measurements are external and the parameters are fitted to them. The negative Bv is not derived from first principles (footnote 9 defers the mass-averaging calculation to future work), and the covariance matrix is partly scaled to the data's diagonal errors, so the reported p-value is not a fully independent forecast; these are limitations of derivation and statistics, not circularity. The large best-fit Bv also raises an uncontrolled-truncation concern for the k^2 expansion, but that is a convergence/robustness issue, not a circular reduction of the model to its inputs. No step in the derivation chain exhibits Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new physical entities. Its free parameters are phenomenological coefficients in the bias and mode-coupling expansions. The main assumptions are the reliability of the Zel'dovich approximation on BAO scales, the peaks-theory motivated form of bias, and the proportionality of the mode-coupling term to the derivative of the propagator. No invented particles, forces, or conserved quantities.

free parameters (5)
  • B1 = 0.60 (HADES config space, Table 1)
    Coefficient of k^2 Rp^2 in the Lagrangian density bias expansion.
  • Bv = -14.3 (HADES config space, Table 1)
    Coefficient controlling the scale dependence of velocity bias, fitted to simulation measurements.
  • A_MC = 0.0077 (HADES config space, Table 1)
    Amplitude of the mode-coupling term, fitted to simulation measurements.
  • R_MC = 5.2 h^-1 Mpc (HADES config space, Table 1)
    Isotropic smearing scale for the mode-coupling term.
  • R_star = 2.5 h^-1 Mpc fixed in fiducial analysis; free in variation
    Lagrangian smoothing scale for the tracer sample. Fixed in the fiducial analysis, but is a free parameter in model variations. It is partly degenerate with sigma_v in a model-agnostic inference.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Zel'dovich approximation is a good description of nonlinear large-scale bulk flows near the BAO scale.
    The entire model rests on this approximation, invoked in Section 2.1 and throughout.
  • domain assumption The linear theory matter power spectrum Plin(k) is known and enters through sigma_v, f, and the Kaiser factor.
    The paper fixes cosmological parameters from simulations; in a model-agnostic setting this must be revisited.
  • ad hoc to paper The mode-coupling term is proportional to the logarithmic derivative of the propagator with constant amplitude and isotropic smearing.
    This is the central approximation in Section 2.3 and Appendix B. It is motivated by CS08 for dark matter but generalized here to biased tracers in redshift space without a full derivation. The volume integral is assumed flat and anisotropic smearing is replaced by isotropic.
  • domain assumption The peaks-theory form of scale-dependent bias holds for mass-averaged galaxy samples.
    Section 2.2 uses the peaks theory form for bLag(k) and bvel(k) and then extends it with free parameters. The paper does not validate this fit against a full peaks-theory prediction; it only checks that the resulting model fits the data.
  • domain assumption The Gauss-Poisson covariance approximation is accurate for BAO-scale multipole measurements.
    Section 3.2 uses the Gauss-Poisson covariance matrix, which is itself an approximation. The paper scales the diagonal errors to match simulation errors, which may hide systematic errors in the covariance.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Scale-dependent bias and mode coupling in redshift-space clustering near the BAO scale." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TQXUQSCS

@misc{pith2026250608082,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Scale-dependent bias and mode coupling in redshift-space clustering near the BAO scale},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TQXUQSCS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.08082}
}
read the original abstract

The baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the 2-point clustering of biased tracers in redshift space can be described in a model-agnostic manner, relying only on the assumption that nonlinear growth approximately smears this feature with a Gaussian kernel sourced by gravitationally driven bulk flows as in the Zel'dovich approximation. An explicit model that demonstrated this in recent work did not account for two physical effects that are very likely observationally relevant in the context of ongoing surveys, namely, the scale-dependence of linear Lagrangian density and velocity bias and the effects of mode coupling. We rectify this shortcoming in this paper by showing that a simple model including these effects is able to accurately describe the multipoles of the 2pcf of realistic tracer samples at BAO scales. Our results indicate that the effects of scale-dependent bias will be important to model for surveys such as DESI, while those of mode coupling are relatively less significant. Our model for scale-dependent bias and mode coupling, which is motivated by model-agnostic arguments from peaks theory and the Zel'dovich approximation, lies in the class of `Laplace-Gauss' expansions, making it straightforward to incorporate these effects in the model-agnostic inference framework mentioned above.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Zel'dovich smearing approximation of the BAO feature for model-agnostic cosmological inference

    astro-ph.CO 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A flexible, template-free BAO model built on Zel'dovich smearing recovers the BAO ruler and growth rate without cosmological bias in mock DESI-like data.

  2. The Linear Point Standard Ruler with DESI DR1 and DR2 Data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Linear-point distance measurements on DESI DR1/DR2 galaxy samples agree with template-based BAO measurements once a cosmology-dependent smearing correction is applied.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Eisenstein, I

    D.J. Eisenstein, I. Zehavi, D.W. Hogg, R. Scoccimarro, M.R. Blanton, R.C. Nichol et al., Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, ApJ633(2005) 560 [astro-ph/0501171]

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    Cole, W.J

    S. Cole, W.J. Percival, J.A. Peacock, P. Norberg, C.M. Baugh, C.S. Frenk et al.,The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications, MNRAS362(2005) 505 [astro-ph/0501174]

    arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Anderson, E

    L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, D. Bizyaev, M. Blanton, A.S. Bolton et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Release 9 spectroscopic galaxy sample, MNRAS427(2012) 3435 [1203.6594]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Anderson, E

    L. Anderson, E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, A.S. Bolton, J. Brinkmann et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measuring DA and H at z = 0.57 from the baryon acoustic peak in the Data Release 9 spectroscopic Galaxy sample, MNRAS439(2014) 83 [1303.4666]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    S. Alam, M. Ata, S. Bailey, F. Beutler, D. Bizyaev, J.A. Blazek et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, MNRAS470(2017) 2617 [1607.03155]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Bottaro, E

    S. Bottaro, E. Castorina, M. Costa, D. Redigolo and E. Salvioni,Unveiling Dark Forces with Measurements of the Large Scale Structure of the Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 201002 [2309.11496]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Sesame: A power spectrum emulator pipeline for beyond-$\Lambda$CDM models

    R. Mauland, H.A. Winther and C.-Z. Ruan,Sesame: A power spectrum emulator pipeline for beyond-ΛCDM models,a (p) 685(2024) A156 [2309.13295]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection

    S. Paradiso, G. McGee and W.J. Percival,Evaluating extensions to LCDM: an application of Bayesian model averaging and selection,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2403.02120 [2403.02120]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Cuesta, M

    A.J. Cuesta, M. Vargas-Magaña, F. Beutler, A.S. Bolton, J.R. Brownstein, D.J. Eisenstein et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the correlation function of LOWZ and CMASS galaxies in Data Relea...

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Beutler, H.-J

    F. Beutler, H.-J. Seo, S. Saito, C.-H. Chuang, A.J. Cuesta, D.J. Eisenstein et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: anisotropic galaxy clustering in Fourier space, MNRAS466(2017) 2242 [1607.03150]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Blomqvist, H

    M. Blomqvist, H. du Mas des Bourboux, N.G. Busca, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Rich, C. Balland et al.,Baryon acoustic oscillations from the cross-correlation of Lyαabsorption and quasars in eBOSS DR14,a (p) 629(2019) A86 [1904.03430]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    du Mas des Bourboux, J

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau et al.,The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with LyαForests, ApJ901(2020) 153 [2007.08995]

    2020 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Gil-Marín, J.E

    H. Gil-Marín, J.E. Bautista, R. Paviot, M. Vargas-Magaña, S. de la Torre, S. Fromenteau et al., The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: measurement of the BAO and growth rate of structure of the luminous red galaxy sample from the anisotropic po...

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    E. Noda, M. Peloso and M. Pietroni,Extracting the BAO scale from BOSS DR12 dataset, Physics of the Dark Universe29(2020) 100579 [1901.06854]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Abbott, M

    T.M.C. Abbott, M. Aguena, S. Allam, A. Amon, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Asorey et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: A 2.7% measurement of baryon acoustic oscillation distance scale at redshift 0.835, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 043512 [2107.04646]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Babić, F

    I. Babić, F. Schmidt and B. Tucci,Straightening the Ruler: Field-Level Inference of the BAO Scale with LEFTfield,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2407.01524 [2407.01524]

    2024

  9. [17]

    Babić, F

    I. Babić, F. Schmidt and B. Tucci,Forward vs Backward: Improving BAO Constraints with Field-Level Inference,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2505.13588 [2505.13588]

    2025

  10. [18]

    Anselmi, G.D

    S. Anselmi, G.D. Starkman and R.K. Sheth,Beating non-linearities: improving the baryon acoustic oscillations with the linear point, MNRAS455(2016) 2474 [1508.01170]

    2016 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Anselmi, P.-S

    S. Anselmi, P.-S. Corasaniti, G.D. Starkman, R.K. Sheth and I. Zehavi,Linear point standard ruler for galaxy survey data: Validation with mock catalogs, Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 023527 [1711.09063]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Anselmi, G.D

    S. Anselmi, G.D. Starkman, P.-S. Corasaniti, R.K. Sheth and I. Zehavi,Galaxy Correlation Functions Provide a More Robust Cosmological Standard Ruler, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018) 021302 [1703.01275]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Nikakhtar, R.K

    F. Nikakhtar, R.K. Sheth and I. Zehavi,Laguerre reconstruction of the correlation function on baryon acoustic oscillation scales, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 043530 [2101.08376]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Nikakhtar, R.K

    F. Nikakhtar, R.K. Sheth and I. Zehavi,Laguerre reconstruction of the BAO feature in halo-based mock galaxy catalogues, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063504 [2107.12537]

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Paranjape and R.K

    A. Paranjape and R.K. Sheth,Bayesian evidence comparison for distance scale estimates, MNRAS517(2022) 4696 [2209.00668]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Paranjape and R.K

    A. Paranjape and R.K. Sheth,Model-agnostic cosmological constraints from the baryon acoustic oscillation feature in redshift space, MNRAS (2023) [2304.09198]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Bharadwaj,The Evolution of Correlation Functions in the Zeldovich Approximation and Its Implications for the Validity of Perturbation Theory, ApJ472(1996) 1 [astro-ph/9606121]

    S. Bharadwaj,The Evolution of Correlation Functions in the Zeldovich Approximation and Its Implications for the Validity of Perturbation Theory, ApJ472(1996) 1 [astro-ph/9606121]

    1996 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Crocce and R

    M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro,Memory of initial conditions in gravitational clustering, Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 063520 [astro-ph/0509419]

    2006 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]. – 14 –

    2016 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al.,DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.03002 [2404.03002]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Desjacques, M

    V. Desjacques, M. Crocce, R. Scoccimarro and R.K. Sheth,Modeling scale-dependent bias on the baryonic acoustic scale with the statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields, Phys. Rev. D 82(2010) 103529 [1009.3449]

    2010 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Gaines, F

    S. Gaines, F. Nikakhtar, N. Padmanabhan and R.K. Sheth,Leveraging protohalos and scale-dependent bias to calibrate the BAO scale in real space, Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103511 [2408.00072]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Marinucci, K

    M. Marinucci, K. Pardede and M. Pietroni,Bootstrapping Lagrangian Perturbation Theory for the Large Scale Structure,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2405.08413 [2405.08413]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Crocce and R

    M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro,Renormalized cosmological perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 73(2006) 063519 [astro-ph/0509418]

    2006 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Crocce and R

    M. Crocce and R. Scoccimarro,Nonlinear evolution of baryon acoustic oscillations, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 023533 [0704.2783]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Taylor and A.J.S

    A.N. Taylor and A.J.S. Hamilton,Non-linear cosmological power spectra in real and redshift space, MNRAS282(1996) 767 [astro-ph/9604020]

    1996 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Peloso, M

    M. Peloso, M. Pietroni, M. Viel and F. Villaescusa-Navarro,The effect of massive neutrinos on the BAO peak, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2015(2015) 001 [1505.07477]

    2015 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS227(1987) 1

    N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS227(1987) 1

    1987

  29. [38]

    Baldauf, V

    T. Baldauf, V. Desjacques and U. Seljak,Velocity bias in the distribution of dark matter halos, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123507 [1405.5885]

    2015 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Paranjape, O

    A. Paranjape, O. Hahn and R.K. Sheth,Halo assembly bias and the tidal anisotropy of the local halo environment, MNRAS476(2018) 3631 [1706.09906]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Sheth, H.J

    R.K. Sheth, H.J. Mo and G. Tormen,Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes, MNRAS323(2001) 1 [arXiv:astro-ph/9907024]

    2001 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Sheth and G

    R.K. Sheth and G. Tormen,An excursion set model of hierarchical clustering: ellipsoidal collapse and the moving barrier, MNRAS329(2002) 61 [astro-ph/0105113]

    2002 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Castorina, A

    E. Castorina, A. Paranjape, O. Hahn and R.K. Sheth,Excursion set peaks: the role of shear, ArXiv e-prints(2016) [1611.03619]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, A

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, A. Banerjee, N. Dalal, E. Castorina, R. Scoccimarro, R. Angulo et al., The Imprint of Neutrinos on Clustering in Redshift Space, ApJ861(2018) 53 [1708.01154]

    2018 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Nikakhtar, N

    F. Nikakhtar, N. Padmanabhan, B. Lévy, R.K. Sheth and R. Mohayaee,Optimal transport reconstruction of biased tracers in redshift space, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 083534 [2307.03671]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Grieb, A.G

    J.N. Grieb, A.G. Sánchez, S. Salazar-Albornoz and C. Dalla Vecchia,Gaussian covariance matrices for anisotropic galaxy clustering measurements, MNRAS457(2016) 1577 [1509.04293]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Alam, F.D

    S. Alam, F.D. Albareti, C. Allende Prieto, F. Anders, S.F. Anderson, T. Anderton et al.,The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III, ApJS219(2015) 12 [1501.00963]

    2015 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, “Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019, Oct., 2019. – 15 –

    1910

  39. [48]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis,Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021(2021) 057 [2005.05290]

    2021 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Lewis,GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1910.13970 [1910.13970]

    A. Lewis,GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,arXiv e-prints(2019) arXiv:1910.13970 [1910.13970]

    2019 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview,arXiv e-prints(2011) arXiv:1104.2932 [1104.2932]

    J. Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview,arXiv e-prints(2011) arXiv:1104.2932 [1104.2932]

    2011 arXiv

  42. [51]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues and T. Tram,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2011(2011) 034 [1104.2933]

    2011 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Tinker, B.E

    J.L. Tinker, B.E. Robertson, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, M.S. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,The Large-scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests, ApJ724 (2010) 878 [1001.3162]

    2010 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Tinker, A.V

    J. Tinker, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, K. Abazajian, M. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality, ApJ688(2008) 709 [0803.2706]

    2008 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Carrasco, M.P

    J.J.M. Carrasco, M.P. Hertzberg and L. Senatore,The effective field theory of cosmological large scale structures,Journal of High Energy Physics2012(2012) 82 [1206.2926]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [55]

    J.J. Lee, F. Nikakhtar, A. Paranjape and R.K. Sheth,Eigen-decomposition of Covariance matrices: An application to the BAO Linear Point,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2407.04692 [2407.04692]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Paranjape and R.K

    A. Paranjape and R.K. Sheth,Model-agnostic basis functions for the 2-point correlation function of dark matter in linear theory,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2410.21374 [2410.21374]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Van Der Walt, S.C

    S. Van Der Walt, S.C. Colbert and G. Varoquaux,The NumPy array: a structure for efficient numerical computation,ArXiv e-prints(2011) [1102.1523]

    2011 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Virtanen, R

    P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T.E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,Nature Methods17 (2020) 261

    2020

  50. [59]

    Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing In Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

    J.D. Hunter,Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment,Computing In Science & Engineering9 (2007) 90

    2007

  51. [60]

    Baldauf and V

    T. Baldauf and V. Desjacques,Phenomenology of baryon acoustic oscillation evolution from Lagrangian to Eulerian space, Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 043535 [1612.04521]

    2017 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Matsubara,Velocity bias and the nonlinear perturbation theory of peaks, Phys

    T. Matsubara,Velocity bias and the nonlinear perturbation theory of peaks, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 083504 [1907.13251]

    2019 arXiv

  53. [62]

    Desjacques and R.K

    V. Desjacques and R.K. Sheth,Redshift space correlations and scale-dependent stochastic biasing of density peaks, Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 023526 [0909.4544]. A Fourier space results Here, we test whether thesdbmcmodel described in the main text can also describe redshift space no...

    2010 arXiv

  54. [63]

    using thesdbmcmodel. See Fig. 4 for the median and central68%confidence ranges of each parameter in the respective samples. From theleft panelof Fig. 3 and Table 2, we see that, similarly to the configuration space results in the main text, thesdbmcmodel is capable of producin...

  55. [64]

    +b 22 (s0/s1)2 k2 1k2

  56. [65]

    (B.2) is modified [62]

    This makesbL 1 (k) +b vel(k) = (b10 + 1) + (b01 − 1)(s0/s1)k 2, and provides an easy way to see how the Kaiser factor in the first term on the right hand side of Eq. (B.2) is modified [62]. When multiplied byG(k, µ), the first term is the one we called ‘prop’ in the main text....

  57. [66]

    Dashed curves show a smeared version of the initial shape, and this same shape multiplied by[(b10 +1)/b 10]2 (i.e.,ξ prop/b2 10)

    Solid cyan and red curves show the initial and Zeldovich-evolved correlation functions. Dashed curves show a smeared version of the initial shape, and this same shape multiplied by[(b10 +1)/b 10]2 (i.e.,ξ prop/b2 10). Solid magenta curve shows the difference between the red cu...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.