Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 91 references

LISA can reconstruct metastable cosmic-string tension and lifetime only when lifetime-dependent spectral structure sits in its band.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 02:51 UTC pith:TS57NXPQ

load-bearing objection Solid LISA injection–recovery map for the vacuum-tunneling metastable-string benchmark; the real product is the reconstruction landscape and residual-plateau sensitivity, not a new template. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28592 v1 pith:TS57NXPQ submitted 2026-07-30 hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc

LISA Reconstruction Landscape for Metastable Cosmic Strings

Satyabrata Datta , Rome Samanta This is my paper
classification hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords LISAmetastable cosmic stringsstochastic gravitational-wave backgroundBayesian reconstructionstring tension Gμmetastability κ_CSGalactic foregroundsparameter degeneracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether LISA can do more than detect a stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings: can it actually recover the two parameters that set the signal—string tension and network lifetime? In the standard vacuum-tunneling picture, strings scale like ordinary cosmic strings until monopole-pair nucleation shuts off loop production, imprinting an infrared f² tail and a broad transition into a high-frequency plateau. Using synthetic LISA data with instrumental noise and astrophysical foregrounds, the authors map the (Gμ, κ_CS) plane with Bayesian diagnostics that separate mere detection from genuine parameter recovery. Reconstruction succeeds when LISA samples the transition between tail and plateau, so amplitude and shape information break the parameters apart—even if the posterior stays elongated along an amplitude–lifetime trade-off. Featureless spectra (pure tail or pure plateau) constrain only limited combinations or fall back on the prior, though very loud plateau-like signals can still retain partial lifetime sensitivity through residual finite-lifetime distortions. How the Galactic foreground is modeled also moves the boundary of what can be reconstructed.

Core claim

Reconstruction of metastable cosmic strings with LISA is governed by lifetime-dependent spectral structure in the detector band. When LISA samples the broad transition between the infrared f² tail and the stable-string-like plateau, the data carry both amplitude and shape information and can recover Gμ and κ_CS, often as a compact but correlated amplitude–lifetime combination. Featureless spectra constrain only limited parameter combinations or become prior-dominated; high-SNR plateau-like spectra can still retain partial κ_CS sensitivity through residual finite-lifetime dependence even when the main transition is not visually prominent.

What carries the argument

The reconstruction landscape in the (Gμ, κ_CS) plane, diagnosed by posterior correlation ρ, anisotropy κ_deg = λ_∥/λ_⊥, best-constrained width √λ_⊥, covariance area √(det C), marginalized widths, and median offset from injection—read against spectral-regime boundaries set by f_low and f_cross relative to the LISA band.

Load-bearing premise

The whole map assumes one shared decay time for loop breaking and network collapse, so the spectrum is fully fixed by only string tension and a single metastability parameter.

What would settle it

Inject generalized metastable-string spectra with split loop-breaking and network-collapse times (or finite-temperature nucleation) into the same LISA pipeline and check whether the claimed transition-window recovery of both parameters, and residual plateau sensitivity to κ_CS, still hold.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • LISA can probe network lifetime, not just overall string tension, when the broad tail-to-plateau transition falls in the mHz band.
  • Detectability alone does not guarantee reconstruction: featureless high-SNR signals mainly pin down amplitude combinations.
  • Compact but strongly correlated posteriors still count as informative reconstruction of an amplitude–lifetime combination.
  • Tightening Galactic foreground shape knowledge enlarges the (Gμ, κ_CS) region where O(10%) recovery is possible, down to much smaller Gμ.
  • The same covariance diagnostics separate prior domination, one-parameter amplitude recovery, correlated reconstruction, and two-parameter recovery for related cosmological SGWB templates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Joint LISA–PTA analyses could pin down the same amplitude–lifetime trade-off across decades in frequency, since the infrared f² tail is already PTA-relevant.
  • If future work splits t_LB from t_NC, the reconstruction maps here become the null baseline against which extra infrared-tail features must be tested for genuine new-parameter sensitivity.
  • Foreground-model dependence suggests that progress on resolving Galactic binaries may unlock more cosmology than raw sensitivity upgrades alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper maps the LISA Bayesian reconstruction landscape for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds from metastable cosmic strings in the standard zero-temperature vacuum-tunneling benchmark. The network is parametrized by string tension Gμ and metastability scale κ_CS; finite lifetime imprints an infrared f² tail and a broad transition to a stable-string-like plateau. Using synthetic TDI A/E/T data with instrumental noise, a flexible Galactic DWD foreground, and an extragalactic compact-binary background, the authors perform nested-sampling inference across the (Gμ, κ_CS) plane. They diagnose detection versus reconstruction via posterior correlation ρ, anisotropy κ_deg, best-constrained eigenvalue λ_⊥, covariance area, marginalized widths, and median offsets, with four benchmark corner plots. The central claim is that reconstruction is controlled by lifetime-dependent spectral structure in the LISA band: when the transition is sampled, both parameters can be recovered (often as a compact but correlated amplitude–lifetime combination); featureless spectra yield limited combinations or prior domination; and high-SNR plateau-like spectra can retain residual κ_CS sensitivity. A reduced tanh Galactic template is used to bracket foreground-model dependence.

Significance. The work advances LISA cosmology from detectability forecasts to inference-level parameter reconstruction for a PTA-motivated source class. Strengths include a realistic multi-component data model, explicit separation of detection from reconstruction via several complementary covariance diagnostics, clear physical regimes tied to f_low and f_cross relative to the LISA band, and a controlled comparison of conservative versus optimistic Galactic foreground templates. The compact-but-correlated reconstruction regime and residual high-SNR lifetime sensitivity are useful conceptual results for the broader SGWB reconstruction literature. Within the stated one-timescale benchmark the maps are informative and should be a useful baseline for generalized metastable-string templates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III C, Eq. (III.17)] Sec. III C and the SNR definition Eq. (III.17): the numerical observation time T_obs, analyzed frequency band [f_min, f_max], segment duration T, and number of segments N_seg used to generate the synthetic data and likelihood are not stated with the same clarity as the noise and foreground fiducials in Table I. These choices fix the absolute SNR scale and therefore the boundaries of the reconstruction regions in Figs. 3–5 and 10–11. Please state the adopted LISA mission duration (and any duty-cycle assumption) and the frequency grid explicitly so that the landscape can be reproduced and compared to other LISA SGWB forecasts.
  2. [Sec. IV C, V B] Sec. IV C and V B (including the example Gμ=10^{-8}, κ_CS=70 with SNR≃6×10^3 for the decay-sensitive piece alone): the claim that high-SNR plateau-like spectra retain partial κ_CS sensitivity via residual finite-lifetime distortions is central and supported by the heat maps, but the supporting SNR estimate is schematic and not defined with the same channel-weighted integral as Eq. (III.17) after foreground and noise marginalization. Please either (i) define that residual SNR with the same likelihood ingredients used in the inference, or (ii) qualify more sharply that the residual sensitivity is an interpretation of the posterior diagnostics rather than an independent detection statistic, especially near the t_s>t_0 boundary highlighted in Fig. 3.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2 and the BP1–BP4 spectra would be easier to read if the approximate LISA band and the locations of f_low and f_cross for each benchmark were marked on the plot, matching the regime boundaries used in Fig. 3.
  2. [Eq. (IV.27), Fig. 3] Eq. (IV.27) introduces f_cross with an ‘order-Hz’ normalization f_0 whose precise value is left unspecified. A single sentence giving the numerical convention used to draw the f_cross=f_low^LISA curve in Fig. 3 would remove ambiguity.
  3. [Table I] Table I lists log10(Gμ) and log10(κ_CS) as ‘grid’ priors; please state the grid spacing or sampling density used for the heat maps so that interpolation artifacts near SNR~1 can be assessed.
  4. [Sec. IV C] The reconstruction threshold √λ_⊥ < log10(1.25)≃0.097 dex (Eqs. IV.31–IV.33) is reasonable but arbitrary; a brief note that results are qualitatively stable under a 10–50% threshold choice would help.
  5. [Section headings] Minor typography: ‘GRA VIT A TIONAL’, ‘MET AST ABLE’, ‘DA T A’, ‘BA YESIAN’, ‘F requency-domain’, ‘COV ARIANCE’, ‘TEMPLA TES’ in section headings appear to be hyphenation/encoding artifacts and should be cleaned for the journal version.
  6. [Sec. III C] Consider releasing the nested-sampling configuration (dynesty/Bilby settings) and a minimal script to regenerate one benchmark corner; this would strengthen reproducibility without requiring full public chains.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: standard injection–recovery forecast with independent mock-data posteriors

full rationale

The paper’s central claim is a LISA reconstruction landscape for the vacuum-tunneling metastable-string benchmark in (Gμ, κ_CS). That claim is obtained by drawing synthetic TDI data from an injected covariance (Sec. III.C), sampling the Bayesian posterior with nested sampling, and mapping covariance diagnostics (ρ, κ_deg, λ_⊥, A_cov), marginalized widths, and median offsets Δ(log10 X) across the plane (Secs. IV–V; Figs. 3–11). Success is not redefined as a fitted quantity: injected values are known a priori and compared to recovered medians and widths. The one-timescale identification ts ≡ t_LB ≡ t_NC (Eq. II.1) is an explicit model restriction, not a derived uniqueness result, and generalized templates are deferred. Self-citations to the authors’ domain-wall reconstruction papers supply covariance-diagnostic methods, not the metastable-string landscape. Spectral templates and f_low / f_cross scalings are taken from the external literature (Buchmuller et al. and standard loop formulas). No step reduces a claimed prediction to its own input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central forecast rests on standard LISA response/noise modeling, standard unresolved-foreground phenomenology, and the conventional one-timescale metastable-string GW template. No new particles are invented; free parameters are nuisance amplitudes/shapes marginalized in the fit plus the two signal parameters scanned on a grid. Load-bearing domain choices are the single decay timescale, loop-only emission, Gaussian stationary SGWB likelihood, and the two Galactic foreground templates used to bracket systematics.

free parameters (6)
  • Gμ (string tension) = grid over log10(Gμ) ∈ (−20, −4)
    Primary signal amplitude parameter; scanned on a grid with broad log prior (−20, −4) and reconstructed from mock data.
  • κ_CS (metastability / bounce-action parameter) = grid over κ_CS ∈ (30, 90)
    Controls nucleation rate and network lifetime; scanned with prior log10(κ_CS) effectively via κ_CS ∈ (30, 90).
  • Instrumental noise amplitudes N_acc, δx = fiducials log10(N_acc)=−14.523, log10(δx)=−11.097
    Leading LISA acceleration and OMS noise levels treated as free nuisance parameters with broad log priors (Table I).
  • Galactic DWD foreground parameters (A1, α1, A2, α2) or h²Ω_Gal = fiducials in Table I; tanh shape fixed by T_obs fit coefficients
    Flexible broken-power-law shape/amplitude parameters in the baseline analysis; reduced to a single normalization in the tanh template comparison.
  • Extragalactic astrophysical background (Ω_ast, ε) = fiducial log10(Ω_ast)=−11.0, ε=0.67
    Power-law amplitude and index marginalized as smooth confusion foreground.
  • Loop/network microphysics constants (α≃0.1, Γ_GW≃50, F_α≃0.1, A_β, δ) = α≃0.1, Γ_GW≃50, cusp δ=4/3 (as stated)
    Standard values taken from cosmic-string literature and held fixed; they set the spectrum normalization and shape entering all reconstructions.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption One-timescale vacuum-tunneling benchmark: ts ≡ t_LB ≡ t_NC controls both efficient loop breaking and network collapse.
    Stated in Sec. II Eq. (II.1); defines the two-parameter template used for the entire landscape.
  • domain assumption Zero-temperature worldsheet monopole–antimonopole nucleation with Γ_q ~ μ/2π e^{−S_4} and S_4 ~ π κ_CS.
    Sec. II Eqs. (II.2)–(II.3); links κ_CS to lifetime and to f_low / f_cross scalings.
  • domain assumption SGWB is incoherent, stationary, Gaussian; TDI A/E/T channels are noise-orthogonal with T approximately a null channel at low frequency.
    Sec. III likelihood construction Eqs. (III.25)–(III.32).
  • domain assumption Unresolved Galactic DWD and extragalactic compact-binary foregrounds are adequately described by the chosen phenomenological templates.
    Eqs. (III.19)–(III.20) and tanh Eq. (VI.1); reconstruction reach depends strongly on this choice (Sec. VI).
  • domain assumption Gravitational-wave emission from finite string segments after monopole nucleation is negligible.
    Sec. II cites recent arguments/simulations and explicitly neglects segment GW emission.
  • standard math Standard nested-sampling Bayesian posterior geometry diagnostics (covariance eigenvalues, Pearson ρ, median offsets) faithfully summarize reconstruction quality even for non-Gaussian posteriors as RMS-width guides.
    Sec. IV; authors caveat non-Gaussian interpretation but still base landscape maps on these second-moment diagnostics.
invented entities (2)
  • f_cross crossover frequency (plateau-onset scale) no independent evidence
    purpose: Interpretive boundary marking when the spectrum becomes plateau-dominated in the LISA band, used to organize reconstruction regimes.
    Defined operationally in Sec. IV Eqs. (IV.20)–(IV.27) from comparing loop length at decay to GW length; not a new physical field, but a paper-specific diagnostic scale whose precise normalization is convention-dependent.
  • Posterior anisotropy diagnostic κ_deg = λ_∥/λ_⊥ and covariance-area A_cov independent evidence
    purpose: Separate elongated trade-off posteriors from well-localized reconstruction and from prior-dominated regions.
    Methodological constructs adapted from the authors’ related domain-wall papers; useful diagnostics rather than physical entities.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 37932 in / 4226 out tokens · 76848 ms · 2026-07-31T02:51:10.905790+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study reconstruction of stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds from metastable cosmic strings with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA). In the vacuum-tunneling benchmark, the network decays via zero-temperature nucleation of monopole pairs on the string worldsheet. Initially following cosmic-string scaling, loop production is suppressed after a decay time linked to efficient loop breaking and network collapse. This finite lifetime imprints an infrared tail and a transition toward a stable-string-like high-frequency plateau. Using synthetic LISA data with instrumental noise and unresolved astrophysical foregrounds, we perform Bayesian analysis in the $(G\mu,\kappa_{\rm CS})$ parameter space. We map detectability, uncertainties, correlations, and localization to distinguish background detection from parameter reconstruction. Reconstruction is governed by lifetime-dependent spectral features in the LISA band. When LISA samples the transition between tail and plateau, data contain amplitude and shape information, enabling recovery of string tension and metastability scale. Posteriors may remain correlated, reflecting an amplitude--lifetime trade-off, yet occupy a small parameter region. By contrast, featureless spectra constrain only limited parameter combinations or become prior dominated. High-SNR plateau-like spectra can retain partial sensitivity to $\kappa_{\rm CS}$ through residual lifetime dependence even when the transition is not prominent. Finally, we assess sensitivity to Galactic foreground modeling by comparing a flexible template with a reduced tanh template. Our results show where LISA can move beyond detection to probe the lifetime of the underlying string network.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28592 by Rome Samanta, Satyabrata Datta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic overview of the stochastic gravitational-wave components included in the LISA analysis. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Representative metastable cosmic-string spectra for the benchmark points used in the recon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Posterior-covariance diagnostics on the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Heat maps of ∆(log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Principal-space reconstruction diagnostics on the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Posterior distribution for benchmark point BP1. This point lies in a high-SNR region where the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Posterior distribution for benchmark point BP2. The posterior exhibits a clear anti-correlated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Posterior distribution for benchmark point BP3. This benchmark illustrates a compact but [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Posterior distribution for benchmark point BP4. The posterior is strongly anti-correlated, indi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Posterior-covariance diagnostics obtained using the reduced Galactic foreground model of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Reconstruction accuracy, posterior localization, and principal-width diagnostics for the reduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_11.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 80 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Abbottet al.(KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientific), Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run, Phys

    R. Abbottet al.(KAGRA, Virgo, LIGO Scientific), Upper limits on the isotropic gravitational-wave background from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run, Phys. Rev. D104, 022004 (2021), arXiv:2101.12130 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys.678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res

    H. Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys.23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys

    A. Afzalet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L11 (2023), arXiv:2306.16219 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    P. Amaro-Seoaneet al.(LISA), Laser Interferometer Space Antenna, (2017), arXiv:1702.00786 [astro- ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  9. [9]

    Armanoet al., Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20µHz, Phys

    M. Armanoet al., Beyond the Required LISA Free-Fall Performance: New LISA Pathfinder Results down to 20µHz, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 061101 (2018). 37

    2018

  10. [10]

    M. R. Adams and N. J. Cornish, Detecting a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background in the presence of a Galactic Foreground and Instrument Noise, Phys. Rev. D89, 022001 (2014), arXiv:1307.4116 [gr- qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  11. [11]

    Boileau, N

    G. Boileau, N. Christensen, R. Meyer, and N. J. Cornish, Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA: Observing both cosmological and astrophysical backgrounds, Phys. Rev. D103, 103529 (2021), arXiv:2011.05055 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Boileau, A

    G. Boileau, A. Lamberts, N. Christensen, N. J. Cornish, and R. Meyer, Spectral separation of the stochastic gravitational-wave background for LISA in the context of a modulated Galactic foreground, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 803 (2021), [Erratum: Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 508, 5554–5555 (2021)], arXiv:2105.04283 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Korol, N

    V. Korol, N. Hallakoun, S. Toonen, and N. Karnesis, Observationally driven Galactic double white dwarf population for LISA, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.511, 5936 (2022), arXiv:2109.10972 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Korolet al., Populations of double white dwarfs in Milky Way satellites and their detectability with LISA, Astron

    V. Korolet al., Populations of double white dwarfs in Milky Way satellites and their detectability with LISA, Astron. Astrophys.638, A153 (2020), arXiv:2002.10462 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Liu, W.-H

    C. Liu, W.-H. Ruan, and Z.-K. Guo, Confusion noise from Galactic binaries for Taiji, Phys. Rev. D 107, 064021 (2023), arXiv:2301.02821 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    E. S. Phinney, A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds, (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0108028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  17. [17]

    Regimbau, The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background, Res

    T. Regimbau, The astrophysical gravitational wave stochastic background, Res. Astron. Astrophys.11, 369 (2011), arXiv:1101.2762 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  18. [18]

    Babak, C

    S. Babak, C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, N. Karnesis, P. Marcoccia, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciar- done, A. Sesana, and J. Torrado, Stochastic gravitational wave background from stellar origin binary black holes in LISA, JCAP08, 034, arXiv:2304.06368 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Lehoucq, I

    L. Lehoucq, I. Dvorkin, R. Srinivasan, C. Pellouin, and A. Lamberts, Astrophysical uncertainties in the gravitational-wave background from stellar-mass compact binary mergers, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.526, 4378 (2023), arXiv:2306.09861 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Preskill and A

    J. Preskill and A. Vilenkin, Decay of metastable topological defects, Phys. Rev. D47, 2324 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9209210

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  21. [21]

    Vilenkin, COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF MONOPOLES CONNECTED BY STRINGS, Nucl

    A. Vilenkin, COSMOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF MONOPOLES CONNECTED BY STRINGS, Nucl. Phys. B196, 240 (1982)

    1982

  22. [22]

    Monin and M

    A. Monin and M. B. Voloshin, The Spontaneous breaking of a metastable string, Phys. Rev. D78, 065048 (2008), arXiv:0808.1693 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Buchmuller, V

    W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, Stochastic gravitational-wave background from metastable cosmic strings, JCAP12(12), 006, arXiv:2107.04578 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  24. [24]

    Buchmuller, V

    W. Buchmuller, V. Domcke, and K. Schmitz, Metastable cosmic strings, JCAP11, 020, arXiv:2307.04691 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Antusch, K

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, S. Saad, and J. Steiner, Singling out SO(10) GUT models using recent PTA results, Phys. Rev. D108, 095053 (2023), arXiv:2307.04595 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Lazarides, R

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, A. Moursy, and Q. Shafi, Inflation, superheavy metastable strings and gravita- tional waves in non-supersymmetric flipped SU(5), JCAP03, 006, arXiv:2308.07094 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Afzal, M

    A. Afzal, M. Mehmood, M. U. Rehman, and Q. Shafi, Supersymmetric hybrid inflation and current- carrying metastable cosmic strings in SU(4)c×SU(2)L×U(1)R, Phys. Rev. D112, 083545 (2025), arXiv:2308.11410 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Ahmed, T

    W. Ahmed, T. A. Chowdhury, S. Nasri, and S. Saad, Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in the Pati-Salam model in light of new pulsar timing array data, Phys. Rev. D109, 015008 (2024), arXiv:2308.13248 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Afzal, Q

    A. Afzal, Q. Shafi, and A. Tiwari, Gravitational wave emission from metastable current-carrying strings in E6, Phys. Lett. B850, 138516 (2024), arXiv:2311.05564 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Lazarides, R

    G. Lazarides, R. Maji, and Q. Shafi, Quantum tunneling in the early universe: stable magnetic monopoles from metastable cosmic strings, JCAP05, 128, arXiv:2402.03128 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Ahmed, M

    W. Ahmed, M. Mehmood, M. U. Rehman, and U. Zubair, Inflation, proton decay and gravitational waves from metastable strings in SU(4) C ×SU(2) L ×U(1) R model, JCAP09, 035, arXiv:2404.06008 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    Antusch, K

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, and S. Saad, Explaining PTA results by metastable cosmic strings from SO(10) GUT, JCAP10, 007, arXiv:2406.17014 [hep-ph]. 38

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    Datta and R

    S. Datta and R. Samanta, Multifaceted supercooling: from PTA to LIGO, JHEP12, 161, arXiv:2506.21397 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    R. Maji, A. Moursy, and Q. Shafi, Induced gravitational waves, metastable cosmic strings and primordial black holes in GUTs, JCAP01, 106, arXiv:2409.13584 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Pallis, T-model Higgs inflation and metastable cosmic strings, JHEP01, 178, arXiv:2409.14338 [hep-ph]

    C. Pallis, T-model Higgs inflation and metastable cosmic strings, JHEP01, 178, arXiv:2409.14338 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Chitose, M

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, Y. Nakayama, S. Shirai, and K. Watanabe, Revisiting metastable cosmic string breaking, JHEP04, 068, arXiv:2312.15662 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Chitose, M

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Neda, and S. Shirai, Gravitational waves from metastable cosmic strings in supersymmetric new inflation model, JCAP04, 010, arXiv:2411.13299 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Tranchedone, E

    L. Tranchedone, E. Carragher, E. Hardy, and N. Koscelansk´ a van IJcken, Metastable cosmic strings are broken at the start (2026), arXiv:2601.04320 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    D. H. Asl and K. Schmitz, New gravitational-wave templates for metastable cosmic strings: Loop breaking versus network collapse (2026), arXiv:2604.28097 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    de Giorgi, J

    A. de Giorgi, J. Ingoldby, V. V. Khoze, and J. Turner, Thermal Metastable Strings in One-Scale Models and Gravitational Waves (2026), arXiv:2606.02689 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Chitose, M

    A. Chitose, M. Ibe, S. Neda, and S. Shirai, Do Cosmic String Segments Emit Gravitational Waves? (2025), arXiv:2507.12386 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Caprini, D

    C. Caprini, D. G. Figueroa, R. Flauger, G. Nardini, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and G. Tasinato, Reconstructing the spectral shape of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA, JCAP11, 017, arXiv:1906.09244 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  43. [43]

    Flauger, N

    R. Flauger, N. Karnesis, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Ricciardone, and J. Torrado, Improved recon- struction of a stochastic gravitational wave background with LISA, JCAP01, 059, arXiv:2009.11845 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  44. [44]

    Caprini, R

    C. Caprini, R. Jinno, M. Lewicki, E. Madge, M. Merchand, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, A. Roper Pol, and V. Vaskonen (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Gravitational waves from first-order phase transitions in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, JCAP10, 020, arXiv:2403.03723 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, Y. Cui, S. Kuroyanagi, M. Lewicki, G. Nardini, M. Pieroni, I. Y. Rybak, L. Sousa, and J. M. Wachter (LISA Cosmology Working Group), Gravitational waves from cosmic strings in LISA: reconstruction pipeline and physics interpretation, JCAP05, 006, arXiv:2405.03740 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    J. E. Gammalet al.(LISA Cosmology Working Group), Reconstructing primordial curvature perturba- tions via scalar-induced gravitational waves with LISA, JCAP05, 062, arXiv:2501.11320 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Gowling and M

    C. Gowling and M. Hindmarsh, Observational prospects for phase transitions at LISA: Fisher matrix analysis, JCAP10, 039, arXiv:2106.05984 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Giese, T

    F. Giese, T. Konstandin, and J. van de Vis, Finding sound shells in LISA mock data using likelihood sampling, JCAP11, 002, arXiv:2107.06275 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Gowling, M

    C. Gowling, M. Hindmarsh, D. C. Hooper, and J. Torrado, Reconstructing physical parameters from template gravitational wave spectra at LISA: first order phase transitions, JCAP04, 061, arXiv:2209.13551 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Samanta, Probing leptogenesis at LISA: a Fisher analysis, JCAP08, 095, arXiv:2503.09884 [hep-ph]

    R. Samanta, Probing leptogenesis at LISA: a Fisher analysis, JCAP08, 095, arXiv:2503.09884 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    Chen, Q.-G

    Z.-C. Chen, Q.-G. Huang, C. Liu, L. Liu, X.-J. Liu, Y. Wu, Y.-M. Wu, Z. Yi, and Z.-Q. You, Prospects for Taiji to detect a gravitational-wave background from cosmic strings, JCAP03, 022, arXiv:2310.00411 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Guan, H.-K

    S. Guan, H.-K. Guo, D. Jiao, Q. Liang, L. Wu, and Y. Zhang, Measuring gravitational wave spec- trum from electroweak phase transition and Higgs self-couplings, Phys. Rev. D113, 075014 (2026), arXiv:2511.00996 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    J. Kume, M. Peloso, M. Pieroni, and A. Ricciardone, Assessing the impact of unequal noises and foreground modeling on SGWB reconstruction with LISA, JCAP06, 030, arXiv:2410.10342 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Dimitriou, D

    A. Dimitriou, D. G. Figueroa, P. Simakachorn, and B. Zaldivar, Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: I. Signal survey, template reconstruction, and model comparison, JCAP05, 037, arXiv:2508.05395 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  55. [55]

    Dimitriou, D

    A. Dimitriou, D. G. Figueroa, P. Simakachorn, I. Stomberg, and B. Zaldivar, Cosmic string gravitational wave backgrounds at LISA: II. Reconstruction of conventional signals over astrophysical foregrounds, (2026), arXiv:2607.15219 [astro-ph.CO]. 39

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Monin and M

    A. Monin and M. B. Voloshin, Breaking of a metastable string at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D78, 125029 (2008), arXiv:0809.5286 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  57. [57]

    Monin and M

    A. Monin and M. B. Voloshin, Destruction of a metastable string by particle collisions, Phys. Atom. Nucl.73, 703 (2010), arXiv:0902.0407 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Monin and M

    A. Monin and M. B. Voloshin, Spontaneous and Induced Decay of Metastable Strings and Domain Walls, Annals Phys.325, 16 (2010), arXiv:0904.1728 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  59. [59]

    Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings, Phys

    A. Vilenkin, Gravitational radiation from cosmic strings, Phys. Lett. B107, 47 (1981)

    1981

  60. [60]

    Vachaspati and A

    T. Vachaspati and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational Radiation from Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. D31, 3052 (1985)

    1985

  61. [61]

    C. T. Hill, H. M. Hodges, and M. S. Turner, Bosonic Superconducting Cosmic Strings, Phys. Rev. D 37, 263 (1988)

    1988

  62. [62]

    W. T. Emond, S. Ramazanov, and R. Samanta, Gravitational waves from melting cosmic strings, JCAP 01(01), 057, arXiv:2108.05377 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado, K. D. Olum, and B. Shlaer, The number of cosmic string loops, Phys. Rev. D89, 023512 (2014), arXiv:1309.6637 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    J. J. Blanco-Pillado and K. D. Olum, Stochastic gravitational wave background from smoothed cosmic string loops, Phys. Rev. D96, 104046 (2017), arXiv:1709.02693 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  65. [65]

    C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Quantitative string evolution, Phys. Rev. D54, 2535 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9602271

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  66. [66]

    C. J. A. P. Martins and E. P. S. Shellard, Extending the velocity dependent one scale string evolution model, Phys. Rev. D65, 043514 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0003298

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  67. [67]

    Sousa and P

    L. Sousa and P. P. Avelino, Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background generated by Cosmic String Networks: Velocity-Dependent One-Scale model versus Scale-Invariant Evolution, Phys. Rev. D88, 023516 (2013), arXiv:1304.2445 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  68. [68]

    Auclairet al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA, JCAP04, 034, arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

    P. Auclairet al., Probing the gravitational wave background from cosmic strings with LISA, JCAP04, 034, arXiv:1909.00819 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1909

  69. [69]

    Damour and A

    T. Damour and A. Vilenkin, Gravitational wave bursts from cusps and kinks on cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D64, 064008 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0104026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  70. [70]

    Matsunami, L

    D. Matsunami, L. Pogosian, A. Saurabh, and T. Vachaspati, Decay of Cosmic String Loops Due to Particle Radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201301 (2019), arXiv:1903.05102 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    Auclair, D

    P. Auclair, D. A. Steer, and T. Vachaspati, Particle emission and gravitational radiation from cosmic strings: observational constraints, Phys. Rev. D101, 083511 (2020), arXiv:1911.12066 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    Y. Cui, M. Lewicki, D. E. Morrissey, and J. D. Wells, Probing the pre-BBN universe with gravitational waves from cosmic strings, JHEP01, 081, arXiv:1808.08968 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [73]

    G. S. F. Guedes, P. P. Avelino, and L. Sousa, Signature of inflation in the stochastic gravitational wave background generated by cosmic string networks, Phys. Rev. D98, 123505 (2018), arXiv:1809.10802 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Gouttenoire, G

    Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant, and P. Simakachorn, Beyond the Standard Models with Cosmic Strings, JCAP07, 032, arXiv:1912.02569 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1912

  75. [75]

    Antusch, K

    S. Antusch, K. Hinze, S. Saad, and J. Steiner, Probing SUSY at gravitational wave observatories, Phys. Lett. B856, 138924 (2024), arXiv:2405.03746 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Borah, S

    D. Borah, S. Jyoti Das, A. K. Saha, and R. Samanta, Probing WIMP dark matter via gravitational waves’ spectral shapes, Phys. Rev. D106, L011701 (2022), arXiv:2202.10474 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Chianese, S

    M. Chianese, S. Datta, G. Miele, R. Samanta, and N. Saviano, Probing flavored regimes of leptogenesis with gravitational waves from cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D111, L041305 (2025), arXiv:2406.01231 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Babichev, D

    E. Babichev, D. Gorbunov, S. Ramazanov, R. Samanta, and A. Vikman, NANOGrav spectral index γ=3 from melting domain walls, Phys. Rev. D108, 123529 (2023), arXiv:2307.04582 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Balaji, G

    S. Balaji, G. Dom` enech, and G. Franciolini, Scalar-induced gravitational wave interpretation of PTA data: the role of scalar fluctuation propagation speed, JCAP10, 041, arXiv:2307.08552 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    Leblond, B

    L. Leblond, B. Shlaer, and X. Siemens, Gravitational Waves from Broken Cosmic Strings: The Bursts and the Beads, Phys. Rev. D79, 123519 (2009), arXiv:0903.4686 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.