Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Boundary Terms for Massive General Relativity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.11238 v2 pith:TZS5OIVT submitted 2018-03-29 hep-th

Boundary Terms for Massive General Relativity

classification hep-th
keywords boundaryactiontermsbulkmassivecountertermsderivativesgraviton
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is well-known that the presence of a spacetime boundary requires the conventional Einstein-Hilbert (EH) action to be supplemented by the Gibbons-Hawking (GH) boundary term in order to retain the standard variational procedure. When the EH action is amended by the diffeomorphism-invariant graviton mass and potential terms, it naively appears that no further boundary terms are needed since all the new fields of massive gravity enter the action with the first derivative. However, we show that such a formulation would be inconsistent, even when the bulk action is ghost-free. The theory is well-defined only after introducing novel boundary counterterms, which dominate over the GH term in the massless limit and cancel the problematic boundary terms induced by the bulk action. The number of boundary counterterms equals the number of total derivatives one could construct in the bulk using positive powers of two derivatives of the longitudinal mode of the massive graviton.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Massive Gravity @ 15

    hep-th 2026-07 unverdicted

    A status review arguing that ghost-free massive gravity remains a theoretically consistent and phenomenologically viable infrared modification of General Relativity, with open UV questions.