Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Redundancy Channels in the Conformal Bootstrap

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spectral gaps from redundant operators carve a bootstrap island for the cubic CFT that excludes O(3).

desk verdict A solid method paper: the C3-vs-O(3) separation is real but conditional on a perturbatively motivated gap, and that caveat needs to stay front and center. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05338 v4 pith:U2YOG4FS submitted 2025-07-07 hep-th cond-mat.stat-mech

Stefanos R. Kousvos , Andreas Stergiou This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thcond-mat.stat-mech
keywords conformalbootstrapcubicCFTredundantoperatorssymmetryenhancementspectralgapsepsilonexpansionO(3)modelhypercubic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to solve a known failure mode of the numerical conformal bootstrap: crossing equations set up with a smaller global symmetry often admit solutions that actually describe a theory with larger symmetry. The proposed fix is to use redundant operators—operators proportional to the equations of motion that vanish on-shell and therefore do not appear in the CFT spectrum—to justify imposing spectral gaps that are valid in the less-symmetric theory but not in its symmetric enhancement. The main application is the cubic CFT in d=3, whose bootstrap island has been contaminated by the O(3) model. Imposing a gap ΔB≥4 on the leading spin-zero operator in the B representation, whose perturbative value in the cubic theory is about 5.3, produces an island that at the O(3) value of Δφ is cut by a strip of disallowed parameter space, the "cubic redundancy channel," which excludes the O(3) point. If correct, this opens the cubic CFT to precision bootstrap study and gives a general recipe for blocking accidental symmetry enhancement in other setups.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the equation-of-motion redundant operator and the spectral gap it creates. A redundant operator is proportional to δS/δφ and has only contact-term correlation functions, so it is absent from the CFT spectrum; when a continuous symmetry breaks, the divergence of the broken current mixes with a near-marginal operator, and the only scaling eigenstate is a redundant combination, leaving no primary at that dimension. In the cubic theory the load-bearing object is the B representation, the antisymmetric rank-two irrep of the hypercubic group, and its leading spin-zero candidate is consumed by the broken O(3) current, forcing the first primary to be φ6-type. Imposing the gap ΔB≥4.0 in the bootstrap then excludes any solution that would have a φ4-type B operator, namely the O(3) theory.

What would settle it

A direct measurement or bootstrap-free calculation of the cubic CFT's leading spin-zero B-channel scalar dimension that gives ΔB<4 would falsify the central exclusion, since the imposed gap would then cut out the very theory the island is meant to contain. Equally decisive would be a numerical bootstrap run with ΔB≥4 that still finds an allowed region containing the O(3) fixed point at higher Λ.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that redundant operators of the less-symmetric theory can descend from genuine primary operators of the more-symmetric theory, so the less-symmetric spectrum has a gap where the symmetric one has an operator. For the cubic group C3 embedded in O(3), the divergence of the broken O(3) current mixes with the only available φ4-type operator in the antisymmetric B representation, turning that operator into a redundant combination of equations of motion. As a result, the first genuine B scalar at spin zero in the cubic theory is of φ6 type at Δ≈5.3, whereas in the O(3) theory the B representation contains a φ4 operator at Δ≈2.99. The paper demonstrates numerically that imposing ΔB≥4 in the mixed ϕ-X-Z correlator system removes the O(3) model from the allowed region while retaining the cubic fixed point, producing the cubic redundancy channel along the ΔX=ΔZ line where symmetry enhancement would occur.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the epsilon-expansion estimate placing the leading B-channel scalar of the cubic CFT near Δ≈5.3 remains valid in d=3, so that imposing a gap at ΔB≥4 does not accidentally discard the cubic theory itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the cubic CFT is genuinely isolated in an island that excludes O(3), precision numerical bootstrap can now extract the critical exponents of the cubic CFT directly in d=3.
  • The same redundant-operator logic identifies a large gap in the X spin-one sector that separates the fully coupled hypercubic theory from N decoupled Ising models.
  • The recipe extends to other symmetry subgroups such as hypertetrahedral, MN, and bifundamental theories, though in biconical models the counting of building blocks shows that no such gap is justified.
  • The method can be carried over to scalar-fermion and gauge theories, where accidental symmetry enhancement is also a problem, although higher operator dimensions make the numerics more demanding.
  • Hidden-sector theories with symmetry C3×K can be excluded by imposing a gap on the singlet spin-one operator, as the paper argues from the dimensions of the relevant operators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The redundancy-channel pattern—a strip of excluded parameter space along the symmetry-enhancement line—could be used diagnostically in any bootstrap search: its appearance after a redundant-operator gap is imposed would signal where an unwanted larger symmetry is entering.
  • If the assumption that ΔB≈5.3 in d=3 is correct, the cubic CFT may soon reach the same precision as the Ising and O(N) models, since the long-standing O(3) contamination was the main obstruction.
  • A natural testable extension is to scan OPE coefficient space at higher Λ after including the φ2 singlet as an external operator, as the paper mentions for future work; a small island emerging there would confirm the practical value of the method for precision studies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a method to obstruct accidental symmetry enhancement in numerical conformal bootstrap studies by imposing spectral gaps motivated by redundant operators, i.e., operators proportional to equations of motion. The authors argue that when the symmetry is reduced from G to H, some primaries of the G-symmetric theory become redundant in the H-theory or are consumed by broken-current descendants, creating large gaps that can be imposed as bootstrap assumptions. After outlining the mechanism for hypercubic, hypertetrahedral, MN, and bifundamental theories, the paper applies it to the d=3 cubic (C3) CFT. The central numerical result is an island in the phi-X-Z correlator system obtained with the assumption Delta_B >= 4 on the leading spin-zero operator in the B irrep; this island excludes the O(3) fixed point, whose B operator has dimension about 2.99. The paper also discusses gaps from broken stress-energy tensors to exclude decoupled Ising theories and comments on hidden sectors.

Significance. If the assumed gap Delta_B >= 4 is justified, the paper provides a useful new tool and the first bootstrap island that excludes O(3) from a C3-symmetric calculation. The operator-counting arguments in Sec. 3 are coherent and match known perturbative spectra; the numerical disproofs are rigorous consequences of the stated assumptions, and the use of public codes (Autoboot, Simpleboot, SDPB) makes the results reproducible. The main caveat is that the central numerical conclusion is conditional on the perturbative/Padé estimate for the cubic B-channel dimension, which carries no error bar and is not independently verified in d=3; this limits the strength of the claim that the method systematically obstructs symmetry enhancement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.2.3, Fig. 7, Table 1] The exclusion of O(3) is effectively an input. Since the O(3) fixed point has Delta_B about 2.99 (Table 1; Monte Carlo 2.987(4), bootstrap upper bound 2.99056), imposing Delta_B >= 4 excludes it by assumption. The nontrivial half of the claim is that the cubic CFT satisfies Delta_B >= 4, which is supported only by the Padé2,3 estimate Delta_B about 5.301 from Ref. [18,19] with no error bar (footnote 10 explicitly states that no error bar is implied). If the true d=3 cubic Delta_B were below 4, Fig. 7 would exclude the very theory the paper aims to isolate. Please provide an error estimate, a sensitivity scan in Delta_B, or an independent d=3 determination (e.g., an upper bound from the bootstrap without imposing the gap), and adjust the wording of the abstract and conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Sec. 4.2, footnote 10, Table 1] The statement that all gap assumptions are comfortably in agreement with the calculations of Refs. [17-19] is not a substitute for a quantitative robustness check. The Padé value 5.301 is one resummation choice; different Padé approximants or truncation orders could, in principle, move the estimate below 4. A plot showing the island for several values of Delta_B (e.g., 3.5, 4.0, 4.5) would demonstrate that the exclusion of O(3) is stable and that the cubic theory remains allowed across a range of gap assumptions.
  3. [Sec. 4.2.3 and Conclusion] The paper states that the island does not include the O(3) fixed point and that this resolves a long-standing problem. Because the gap Delta_B >= 4 is an assumption rather than a derived consequence, the statement should be framed as a conditional demonstration: assuming the cubic spectrum has Delta_B >= 4, the bootstrap rules out O(3) and yields an island. As written, the conclusion overstates the degree to which the paper proves the absence of symmetry enhancement, especially since Fig. 8 confirms that removing the Delta_B gap removes the channel that excludes O(3).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Eq. (2.9)] The expression "langle phi(x1) ... phi(xn)) rangle" contains an extra closing parenthesis; it should read "langle phi(x1) ... phi(xn) rangle".
  2. [Sec. 2.1] "From here one we will be more sloppy" should read "From here on we will be more sloppy".
  3. [Sec. 2.1, Eqs. (2.6)-(2.8)] The mixing-matrix notation is schematic; the upper-triangular form depends on a specific renormalization scheme and on the choice of operator basis, which is not fully spelled out. A brief explanation of the scheme would improve clarity.
  4. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption states that the yellow square gives the conformal perturbation theory results from Ref. [38], but no corresponding point for the cubic CFT prediction is marked in the figure; adding such a point would help the reader assess whether the island indeed contains the cubic theory.
  5. [Abstract] The abstract says that the method "obstructs" symmetry enhancement and that the channel "corresponds precisely" to the enhancement region; given the conditional nature of the numerical demonstration, a more cautious phrasing (e.g., "can obstruct") would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the O(3)-excluding island is a transparent consequence of the stated ΔB≥4.0 gap, and the gap value comes from independent perturbative Padé data rather than from fitting the bootstrap output.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain, the numerical claims are conditional bootstrap results under explicitly stated gap assumptions. In Sec. 4.2.3 (Fig. 7) the paper imposes ΔB≥4.0 and then notes in the caption that "A channel along the diagonal due to the assumption ΔB⩾4.0 is observed." The O(3) point is excluded because its leading B-channel dimension is independently known to be ≈2.99 (Table 1, with Monte Carlo 2.987(4) [48] and bootstrap bound 2.99056 [11]); that exclusion is therefore a direct consequence of the input gap, not a hidden "prediction" derived from the bootstrap alone. The gap itself is not fitted to the bootstrap data: Table 1 quotes ΔB=5.301 for the cubic fixed point from a Padé2,3 resummation of ε-expansion results [18,19]. The paper is transparent that the spectral assumptions are perturbatively motivated ("All assumptions are comfortably in agreement with the multi-loop predictions for the spectrum of the C3 theory provided in [17–19]"). Whether that Padé estimate survives in d=3 is a real correctness risk — if the true cubic B-channel dimension were below 4.0, the same gap would exclude the target theory — but that is a question about the validity of an input assumption, not circular reasoning. The self-citations [17–19] are load-bearing for the numerical value of the gap, but they supply parameter-free perturbative calculations with stated assumptions that do not incorporate the bootstrap result, so under the standards for independent support they do not constitute a circular premise. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its input by construction, and the O(3) exclusion is not presented as an independent prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new entities. Its input parameters are the spectral gap bounds, mostly taken from perturbative calculations by the same group ([17-19]). The non-perturbative validity of these bounds is the main unverified input.

free parameters (3)
  • ΔB gap = 4.0
    Chosen above the O(3) value (2.992) and below the cubic perturbative estimate (5.301); it is the load-bearing assumption that excludes O(3).
  • ΔT'μν gap = 4.0
    Gap on the subleading spin-2 singlet; from Padé resummation the actual value is 4.73644, so the gap is safe but not rigorously proven.
  • Other spectral gaps (ΔS, ΔX', ΔZ', Δϕ', etc.) = 1.5 to 2.8 depending on plot
    Chosen from perturbative spectra of [17-19] to be comfortably below the predicted operator dimensions.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Unitarity and crossing symmetry of the CFT
    Foundational assumptions of the numerical bootstrap used throughout.
  • domain assumption Existence of the cubic fixed point C3 in d=3
    The target theory is the IR fixed point of (1.1); its existence and approximate spectrum are taken from the epsilon expansion and prior Monte Carlo studies.
  • domain assumption Validity of epsilon expansion and Padé resummations for operator dimensions
    The gap assumptions (especially ΔB≥4) rely on these perturbative results, which are not proven in d=3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Redundancy Channels in the Conformal Bootstrap." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U2YOG4FS

@misc{pith2026250705338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Redundancy Channels in the Conformal Bootstrap},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U2YOG4FS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05338}
}
abstract

A method for obstructing symmetry enhancement in numerical conformal bootstrap calculations is proposed. Symmetry enhancement refers to situations where bootstrap studies initialised with a certain symmetry end up allowing theories with higher symmetry. In such cases, it is shown that redundant operators in the less symmetric theory can descend from primary scaling operators of the more symmetric one, motivating the imposition of spectral gaps that are justified in the former but not the latter. The same mechanism can also be used to differentiate between decoupled and fully coupled theories which otherwise have the same global symmetry. A systematic understanding of this mechanism is developed and applied to distinguish the cubic from the $O(3)$ model in three dimensions, where a strip of disallowed parameter space, referred to as the cubic redundancy channel, emerges once a gap associated with a redundant operator of the cubic theory is imposed. The channel corresponds precisely to the region of parameter space where the assumed cubic symmetry would be enhanced to $O(3)$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Depending on the value of N, the IR stable fixed point is either the O(N) model, denoted by H, or the hypercubic theory, denoted by C. The free theory is denoted by G and decoupled Ising models by I. The region between the hatched lines is the basin of attraction of the IR stable fixed point. The value Nc is equal to four at leading order in the ε expansion, but gets corrected order by order in ε. Early studies can … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Channel in the ∆Z-∆X plane obstructing symmetry enhancement, calculated at Λ = 11. The numerical parameters used are Set A and Set 1 of Appendix A. The gap assumptions on the spectrum are ∆S ⩾ 1.5, ∆X′ ⩾ 2.8, ∆Z′ ⩾ 2.8, ∆XXµ ⩾ 3.0 and ∆T′ µν ⩾ 3.5. Names and constructions of representations are given in [17]. Primes denote a subleading operator in a given sector. A twist gap of δ = 10−6 is imposed on all operators n… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Channel in the ∆Z-∆X plane obstructing symmetry enhancement, calculated at Λ = 19. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 1 of Appendix A. The gaps on the spectrum and other assumptions are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Channel in the ∆Z-∆X plane obstructing symmetry enhancement, calculated at Λ = 27. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 1 of Appendix A. The gaps on the spectrum and other assumptions are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Island in the ∆ϕ-∆Z plane at Λ = 19. The island contains both the C3 and O(3) CFTs. This will be remedied when we study the full ϕ-X-Z correlator system. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 1 of Appendix A. The gap assumptions on the spectrum are ∆S ⩾ 1.5, …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Island in the ∆ϕ-∆Z plane at Λ = 19, with stronger assumptions compared to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Projection onto the ∆X-∆Z plane at ∆ϕ = 0.51893 of the full ∆ϕ-∆X-∆Z island, at Λ = 19. The value of ∆ϕ is taken to be the central value reported in [11] for the O(3) model. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 2 of Appendix A. The gap assumptions on the spe…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Projection onto the ∆X-∆Z plane at ∆ϕ = 0.51893 of the full ∆ϕ-∆X-∆Z island, at Λ = 19. The value of ∆ϕ is taken to be the central value reported in [11] for the O(3) model. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 2 of Appendix A. The gap assumptions on the spe…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Projection onto the ∆X-∆Z plane at ∆ϕ = 0.5185 of the full ∆ϕ-∆X-∆Z island, at Λ = 19. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 2 of Appendix A. The gap assumptions on the spectrum are ∆S ⩾ 1.5, ∆X′ ⩾ 2.5, ∆Z′ ⩾ 2.5, ∆ϕ′ ⩾ 1.5, ∆B ⩾ 4.0 and ∆T′ µν ⩾ 4.0. Names a…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Projection onto the ∆X-∆Z plane at ∆ϕ = 0.5195 of the full ∆ϕ-∆X-∆Z island, at Λ = 19. The numerical parameters used are Set B and Set 2 of Appendix A. The gap assumptions on the spectrum are ∆S ⩾ 1.5, ∆X′ ⩾ 2.5, ∆Z′ ⩾ 2.5, ∆ϕ′ ⩾ 1.5, ∆B ⩾ 4.0 and ∆T′ µν ⩾ 4.0. Names …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The $O(N)$ Free-Scalar and Wilson-Fisher Conformal Field Theories on the Fuzzy Sphere

    cond-mat.str-el 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Fuzzy-sphere Hamiltonians realize the O(2), O(3) and O(4) Wilson-Fisher and free-scalar CFTs numerically, with spectra and correlators matching conformal bootstrap expectations.

  2. Comment on "Redundancy Channels in the Conformal Bootstrap" by S. R. Kousvos and A. Stergiou

    hep-th 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    Rychkov argues that identifying operators related by equations of motion, which differ only by contact terms, yields correct CFT scaling dimensions, and that Kousvos and Stergiou's criticism is a terminological difference.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT

    R. Rattazzi, V. S. Rychkov, E. Tonni & A. Vichi,“Bounding scalar operator dimensions in 4D CFT”, JHEP0812, 031 (2008),arXiv:0807.0004 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications

    D. Poland, S. Rychkov & A. Vichi,“The Conformal Bootstrap: Theory, Numerical Techniques, and Applications”, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015002 (2019),arXiv:1805.04405 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Solv- ing the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin & A. Vichi,“Solv- ing the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap”, Phys. Rev. D86, 025022 (2012), arXiv:1203.6064 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2012

  4. [4]

    Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents

    S. El-Showk, M. F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin & A. Vichi,“Solving the 3d Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap II. c-Minimization and Precise Critical Exponents”, J. Stat. Phys.157, 869 (2014),arXiv:1403.4545 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the 3D Ising Model

    F. Kos, D. Poland & D. Simmons-Duffin,“Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in the 3D Ising Model”, JHEP1411, 109 (2014),arXiv:1406.4858 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Precision Islands in the Ising andO(N ) Models

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin & A. Vichi,“Precision Islands in the Ising andO(N ) Models”, JHEP1608, 036 (2016),arXiv:1603.04436 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor

    C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland & D. Simmons-Duffin,“Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor”, JHEP2503, 136 (2025),arXiv:2411.15300 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Bootstrapping theO(N )vector models

    F. Kos, D. Poland & D. Simmons-Duffin,“Bootstrapping theO(N )vector models”, JHEP1406, 091 (2014),arXiv:1307.6856 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 85 references
  1. [9]

    Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin & A. Vichi,“Bootstrapping the O(N) Archipelago”, JHEP1511, 106 (2015),arXiv:1504.07997 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Carving out OPE space and preciseO(2)model critical exponents

    S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su & A. Vichi, “Carving out OPE space and preciseO(2)model critical exponents”, JHEP2006, 142 (2020), arXiv:1912.03324 [hep-th]. 32

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Boot- strapping Heisenberg magnets and their cubic instability

    S. M. Chester, W. Landry, J. Liu, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su & A. Vichi,“Boot- strapping Heisenberg magnets and their cubic instability”, Phys. Rev. D104, 105013 (2021), arXiv:2011.14647 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Carving Out the Space of 4D CFTs

    D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin & A. Vichi,“Carving Out the Space of 4D CFTs”, JHEP1205, 110 (2012),arXiv:1109.5176 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Bootstrapping hypercubic and hypertetrahedral theories in three dimensions

    A. Stergiou,“Bootstrapping hypercubic and hypertetrahedral theories in three dimensions”, JHEP 1805, 035 (2018),arXiv:1801.07127 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Searching for gauge theories with the conformal bootstrap

    Z. Li & D. Poland,“Searching for gauge theories with the conformal bootstrap”, JHEP2103, 172 (2021),arXiv:2005.01721 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Automorphic spectra and the conformal bootstrap

    P. Kravchuk, D. Mazac & S. Pal,“Automorphic spectra and the conformal bootstrap”, Commun. Am. Math. Soc.4, 1 (2024),arXiv:2111.12716 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Spectrum of anomalous dimensions in hypercubic theories

    O. Antipin & J. Bersini,“Spectrum of anomalous dimensions in hypercubic theories”, Phys. Rev. D100, 065008 (2019),arXiv:1903.04950 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Anomalous dimensions in hypercubic theories

    A. Bednyakov, J. Henriksson & S. R. Kousvos,“Anomalous dimensions in hypercubic theories”, JHEP2311, 051 (2023),arXiv:2304.06755 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Multi-loop spectra in general scalar EFTs and CFTs

    J. Henriksson, F. Herzog, S. R. Kousvos & J. Roosmale Nepveu,“Multi-loop spectra in general scalar EFTs and CFTs”,arXiv:2507.12518 [hep-ph]

  11. [19]

    EFT meets CFT: Multiloop renormaliza- tion of higher-dimensional operators in generalϕ4 theories

    J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos & J. Roosmale Nepveu,“EFT meets CFT: Multiloop renormaliza- tion of higher-dimensional operators in generalϕ4 theories”,arXiv:2511.16740 [hep-th]

  12. [20]

    Dimensional Regularization of Composite Operators in Scalar Field Theory

    L. S. Brown,“Dimensional Regularization of Composite Operators in Scalar Field Theory”, Annals Phys.126, 135 (1980)

    1980

  13. [21]

    Dimensional Renormalization of Scalar Field Theory in Curved Space-time

    L. S. Brown & J. C. Collins,“Dimensional Renormalization of Scalar Field Theory in Curved Space-time”, Annals Phys.130, 215 (1980)

    1980

  14. [22]

    Redundant operators for Ising spins

    G. Murthy & R. Shankar,“Redundant operators for Ising spins”, Phys. Rev. B32, 5851 (1985)

    1985

  15. [23]

    Theε-expansion from conformal field theory

    S. Rychkov & Z. M. Tan,“Theε-expansion from conformal field theory”, J. Phys. A48, 29FT01 (2015),arXiv:1505.00963 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory

    A. Pelissetto & E. Vicari,“Critical phenomena and renormalization group theory”, Phys. Rept. 368, 549 (2002),cond-mat/0012164

    2002 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Seeking fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theε expansion

    H. Osborn & A. Stergiou,“Seeking fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theε expansion”, JHEP1805, 051 (2018),arXiv:1707.06165 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    General Properties of Multiscalar RG Flows ind = 4 −ε

    S. Rychkov & A. Stergiou,“General Properties of Multiscalar RG Flows ind = 4 −ε”, SciPost Phys.6, 008 (2019),arXiv:1810.10541 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Critical Behavior of Magnets with Dipolar Interactions. I. Renormalization Group near Four Dimensions

    A. Aharony & M. E. Fisher,“Critical Behavior of Magnets with Dipolar Interactions. I. Renormalization Group near Four Dimensions”, Phys. Rev. B8, 3323 (1973). 33

    1973

  20. [28]

    Critical Behavior of Anisotropic Cubic Systems

    A. Aharony,“Critical Behavior of Anisotropic Cubic Systems”, Phys. Rev. B8, 4270 (1973)

    1973

  21. [29]

    Critical behaviour of anisotropic cubic systems

    D. J. Wallace,“Critical behaviour of anisotropic cubic systems”, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics6, 1390 (1973)

    1973

  22. [30]

    New approach to Borel summation of divergent series and critical exponent estimates for an N vector cubic model in three-dimensions from five loop epsilon expansions

    A. I. Mudrov & K. B. Varnashev,“New approach to Borel summation of divergent series and critical exponent estimates for an N vector cubic model in three-dimensions from five loop epsilon expansions”, Phys. Rev. E58, 5371 (1998),cond-mat/9805081

    1998 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Stability of a cubic fixed point in three-dimensions: Critical exponents for generic N

    K. B. Varnashev,“Stability of a cubic fixed point in three-dimensions: Critical exponents for generic N”, Phys. Rev. B61, 14660 (2000),cond-mat/9909087

    2000 arXiv

  24. [32]

    The N component Ginzburg-Landau Hamiltonian with cubic anisotropy: A Six loop study

    J. M. Carmona, A. Pelissetto & E. Vicari,“The N component Ginzburg-Landau Hamiltonian with cubic anisotropy: A Six loop study”, Phys. Rev. B61, 15136 (2000),cond-mat/9912115

    2000 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Pseudo ε expansion of six-loop renormalization- group functions of an anisotropic cubic model

    R. Folk, Y. Holovatch & T. Yavors’kii,“Pseudo ε expansion of six-loop renormalization- group functions of an anisotropic cubic model”, Physical Review B62, 12195–12200 (2000), cond-mat/0003216

    2000 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Six-loopε expansion study of three-dimensionaln-vector model with cubic anisotropy

    L. T. Adzhemyan, E. V. Ivanova, M. V. Kompaniets, A. Kudlis & A. I. Sokolov,“Six-loopε expansion study of three-dimensionaln-vector model with cubic anisotropy”, Nucl. Phys. B940, 332 (2019),arXiv:1901.02754 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    The cubic fixed point at largeN

    D. J. Binder,“The cubic fixed point at largeN”, JHEP2109, 071 (2021), arXiv:2106.03493 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Different critical behaviors in cubic to trig- onal and tetragonal perovskites

    A. Aharony, O. Entin-Wohlman & A. Kudlis,“Different critical behaviors in cubic to trig- onal and tetragonal perovskites”, Phys. Rev. B105, 104101 (2022), arXiv:2201.08252 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2022 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Cubic fixed point in three dimensions: Monte Carlo simulations of theϕ4 model on the simple cubic lattice

    M. Hasenbusch,“Cubic fixed point in three dimensions: Monte Carlo simulations of theϕ4 model on the simple cubic lattice”, Phys. Rev. B107, 024409 (2023), arXiv:2211.16170 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2023 arXiv

  30. [38]

    From O(3) to Cubic CFT: Conformal Perturbation and the Large Charge Sector

    J. Rong & N. Su,“From O(3) to Cubic CFT: Conformal Perturbation and the Large Charge Sector”,arXiv:2311.00933 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Scalar CFTs and Their Large N Limits

    J. Rong & N. Su,“Scalar CFTs and Their Large N Limits”, JHEP1809, 103 (2018), arXiv:1712.00985 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories

    S. R. Kousvos & A. Stergiou,“Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories”, SciPost Phys.6, 035 (2019),arXiv:1810.10015 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories II

    S. R. Kousvos & A. Stergiou,“Bootstrapping Mixed Correlators in Three-Dimensional Cubic Theories II”, SciPost Phys.8, 085 (2020),arXiv:1911.00522 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Anomalous dimensions of higher-order operators in theφ 4-theory

    E. Brezin, C. De Dominicis & J. Zinn-Justin,“Anomalous dimensions of higher-order operators in theφ 4-theory”, Lett. Nuovo Cim.9S2, 483 (1974). 34

    1974

  35. [43]

    On (un)broken higher-spin symmetry in vector models

    E. D. Skvortsov,“On (un)broken higher-spin symmetry in vector models.”,arXiv:1512.05994 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bootstrapping mixed MN correlators in 3D

    S. R. Kousvos & A. Stergiou,“Bootstrapping mixed MN correlators in 3D”, SciPost Phys.12, 206 (2022),arXiv:2112.03919 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Exploring replica-Potts CFTs in two dimensions

    S. R. Kousvos, A. Piazza & A. Vichi,“Exploring replica-Potts CFTs in two dimensions”, JHEP 2411, 030 (2024),arXiv:2405.19416 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Six-loop beta functions in general scalar theory

    A. Bednyakov & A. Pikelner,“Six-loop beta functions in general scalar theory”, JHEP2104, 233 (2021),arXiv:2102.12832 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  39. [47]

    The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data

    J. Henriksson,“The critical O(N) CFT: Methods and conformal data”, Phys. Rept.1002, 1 (2023),arXiv:2201.09520 [hep-th]

    2023

  40. [48]

    Anisotropic perturbations in three-dimensional O(N)-symmetric vector models

    M. Hasenbusch & E. Vicari,“Anisotropic perturbations in three-dimensional O(N)-symmetric vector models”, Phys. Rev. B84, 125136 (2011)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Bootstrapping MN and Tetragonal CFTs in Three Dimensions

    A. Stergiou,“Bootstrapping MN and Tetragonal CFTs in Three Dimensions”, SciPost Phys.7, 010 (2019),arXiv:1904.00017 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Perturbative and Nonperturbative Studies of CFTs with MN Global Symmetry

    J. Henriksson & A. Stergiou,“Perturbative and Nonperturbative Studies of CFTs with MN Global Symmetry”, SciPost Phys.11, 015 (2021),arXiv:2101.08788 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Approaching the conformal window ofO(n) ×O (m)symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models using the conformal bootstrap

    Y. Nakayama & T. Ohtsuki,“Approaching the conformal window ofO(n) ×O (m)symmetric Landau-Ginzburg models using the conformal bootstrap”, Phys. Rev. D89, 126009 (2014), arXiv:1404.0489 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Bootstrapping phase transitions in QCD and frustrated spin systems

    Y. Nakayama & T. Ohtsuki,“Bootstrapping phase transitions in QCD and frustrated spin systems”, Phys. Rev. D91, 021901 (2015),arXiv:1407.6195 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Analytic and Numerical Bootstrap of CFTs with O(m) ×O (n)Global Symmetry in 3D

    J. Henriksson, S. R. Kousvos & A. Stergiou,“Analytic and Numerical Bootstrap of CFTs with O(m) ×O (n)Global Symmetry in 3D”, SciPost Phys.9, 035 (2020), arXiv:2004.14388 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Multi-fixed point numerical conformal bootstrap: a case study with structured global symmetry

    M. T. Dowens & C. A. Hooley,“Multi-fixed point numerical conformal bootstrap: a case study with structured global symmetry”, JHEP2021, 147 (2020),arXiv:2004.14978 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: the fate of the chiralO(N ) × O(2)universality class

    M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, B. Sirois & B. C. van Rees,“Bootstrapping frustrated magnets: the fate of the chiralO(N ) × O(2)universality class”, SciPost Phys.18, 060 (2025), arXiv:2405.19411 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Heavy handed quest for fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theεexpansion

    H. Osborn & A. Stergiou,“Heavy handed quest for fixed points in multiple coupling scalar theories in theεexpansion”, JHEP2104, 128 (2021),arXiv:2010.15915 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Renormalization-Group Analysis of Bicritical and Tetracritical Points

    D. R. Nelson, J. M. Kosterlitz & M. E. Fisher,“Renormalization-Group Analysis of Bicritical and Tetracritical Points”, Phys. Rev. Lett.33, 813 (1974). 35

    1974

  50. [58]

    Bicritical and tetracritical points in anisotropic antiferromagnetic systems

    J. M. Kosterlitz, D. R. Nelson & M. E. Fisher,“Bicritical and tetracritical points in anisotropic antiferromagnetic systems”, Phys. Rev. B13, 412 (1976)

    1976

  51. [59]

    Multicritical phenomena in O(n(1)) + O(n(2)) symmetric theories

    P. Calabrese, A. Pelissetto & E. Vicari,“Multicritical phenomena in O(n(1)) + O(n(2)) symmetric theories”, Phys. Rev. B67, 054505 (2003),cond-mat/0209580

    2003 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Long-range multi-scalar models at three loops

    D. Benedetti, R. Gurau, S. Harribey & K. Suzuki,“Long-range multi-scalar models at three loops”, J. Phys. A53, 445008 (2020),arXiv:2007.04603 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Spontaneous breaking of finite group symmetries at all temperatures

    P. Liendo, J. Rong & H. Zhang,“Spontaneous breaking of finite group symmetries at all temperatures”, SciPost Phys.14, 168 (2023),arXiv:2205.13964 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  54. [62]

    autoboot: A generator of bootstrap equations with global symmetry

    M. Go & Y. Tachikawa,“autoboot: A generator of bootstrap equations with global symmetry”, JHEP1906, 084 (2019),arXiv:1903.10522 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    An Automated Generation of Bootstrap Equations for Numerical Study of Critical Phenomena

    M. Go,“An Automated Generation of Bootstrap Equations for Numerical Study of Critical Phenomena”,arXiv:2006.04173 [hep-th]

    2006 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Simpleboot

    N. Su,“Simpleboot”,https://gitlab.com/bootstrapcollaboration/simpleboot

  57. [65]

    A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin,“A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap”, JHEP1506, 174 (2015),arXiv:1502.02033 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Scaling the semidefinite program solver SDPB

    W. Landry & D. Simmons-Duffin,“Scaling the semidefinite program solver SDPB”, arXiv:1909.09745 [hep-th]

    1909 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Mini-Course of Numerical Conformal Bootstrap

    A. Liu & N. Su,“Mini-Course of Numerical Conformal Bootstrap”, https://events. perimeterinstitute.ca/event/45/

  60. [68]

    Mini-Course of Numerical Conformal Bootstrap, Tutorials

    A. Liu & N. Su,“Mini-Course of Numerical Conformal Bootstrap, Tutorials”,https://gitlab. com/AikeLiu/Bootstrap-Mini-Course/-/tree/master

  61. [69]

    Analytic functional bootstrap for CFTs ind >1

    M. F. Paulos,“Analytic functional bootstrap for CFTs ind >1”, JHEP2004, 093 (2020), arXiv:1910.08563 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Numerical conformal bootstrap with analytic functionals and outer approximation

    K. Ghosh & Z. Zheng,“Numerical conformal bootstrap with analytic functionals and outer approximation”, JHEP2409, 143 (2024),arXiv:2307.11144 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [71]

    CFTs with U (m) ×U (n)global symmetry in 3D and the chiral phase transition of QCD

    S. R. Kousvos & A. Stergiou,“CFTs with U (m) ×U (n)global symmetry in 3D and the chiral phase transition of QCD”, SciPost Phys.15, 075 (2023),arXiv:2209.02837 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Bootstrapping the minimal N = 1 superconformal field theory in three dimensions

    J. Rong & N. Su,“Bootstrapping the minimal N = 1 superconformal field theory in three dimensions”, JHEP2106, 154 (2021),arXiv:1807.04434 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Bootstrapping the Minimal 3D SCFT

    A. Atanasov, A. Hillman & D. Poland,“Bootstrapping the Minimal 3D SCFT”, JHEP1811, 140 (2018),arXiv:1807.05702 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Precision bootstrap for theN = 1 super-Ising model

    A. Atanasov, A. Hillman, D. Poland, J. Rong & N. Su,“Precision bootstrap for theN = 1 super-Ising model”, JHEP2208, 136 (2022),arXiv:2201.02206 [hep-th]. 36

    2022 arXiv

  67. [75]

    The Gross-Neveu-Yukawa archipelago

    R. S. Erramilli, L. V. Iliesiu, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, D. Poland & D. Simmons-Duffin,“The Gross-Neveu-Yukawa archipelago”, JHEP2302, 036 (2023),arXiv:2210.02492 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Bounding irrelevant operators in the 3d Gross-Neveu-Yukawa CFTs

    M. S. Mitchell & D. Poland,“Bounding irrelevant operators in the 3d Gross-Neveu-Yukawa CFTs”, JHEP2409, 134 (2024),arXiv:2406.12974 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Scalar-fermion fixed points in theε expansion

    W. H. Pannell & A. Stergiou,“Scalar-fermion fixed points in theε expansion”, JHEP2308, 128 (2023),arXiv:2305.14417 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    A roadmap for bootstrapping critical gauge theories: decoupling operators of conformal field theories ind > 2dimensions

    Y.-C. He, J. Rong & N. Su,“A roadmap for bootstrapping critical gauge theories: decoupling operators of conformal field theories ind > 2dimensions”, SciPost Phys.11, 111 (2021), arXiv:2101.07262 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Coupled Potts models: Self-duality and fixed point structure

    V. Dotsenko, J. L. Jacobsen, M.-A. Lewis & M. Picco,“Coupled Potts models: Self-duality and fixed point structure”, Nucl. Phys. B546, 505 (1999),cond-mat/9812227

    1999 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Coupled Minimal Conformal Field Theory Models Revisited

    A. Antunes & C. Behan,“Coupled Minimal Conformal Field Theory Models Revisited”, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 071602 (2023),arXiv:2211.16503 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry

    A. Antunes & C. Behan,“Coupled minimal models revisited II: Constraints from permutation symmetry”, SciPost Phys.18, 132 (2025),arXiv:2412.21107 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  74. [82]

    The tricritical Ising CFT and conformal bootstrap

    J. Henriksson,“The tricritical Ising CFT and conformal bootstrap”, arXiv:2501.18711 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  75. [83]

    Navigator Function for the Conformal Bootstrap

    M. Reehorst, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin, B. Sirois, N. Su & B. van Rees,“Navigator Function for the Conformal Bootstrap”, SciPost Phys.11, 072 (2021), arXiv:2104.09518 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Skydiving to Bootstrap Islands

    A. Liu, D. Simmons-Duffin, N. Su & B. C. van Rees,“Skydiving to Bootstrap Islands”, arXiv:2307.13046 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  77. [85]

    King’s Computational Research, Engineering and Technology Environ- ment (CREATE)

    King’s College London,“King’s Computational Research, Engineering and Technology Environ- ment (CREATE)”,https://doi.org/10.18742/rnvf-m076. 37

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.