Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning Symbolic Expressions via Gumbel-Max Equation Learner Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.06921 v2 pith:U5PN44TY submitted 2020-12-12 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords learningparametersequationgmeqlgumbel-maxlearnermachinenetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Most of the neural networks (NNs) learned via state-of-the-art machine learning techniques are black-box models. For a widespread success of machine learning in science and engineering, it is important to develop new NN architectures to effectively extract high-level mathematical knowledge from complex datasets. Motivated by this understanding, this paper develops a new NN architecture called the Gumbel-Max Equation Learner (GMEQL) network. Different from previously proposed Equation Learner (EQL) networks, GMEQL applies continuous relaxation to the network structure via the Gumbel-Max trick and introduces two types of trainable parameters: structure parameters and regression parameters. This paper also proposes a two-stage training process with new techniques to train structure parameters in both online and offline settings based on an elite repository. On 8 benchmark symbolic regression problems, GMEQL is experimentally shown to outperform several cutting-edge machine learning approaches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comparative Study of Neurosymbolic AI Approaches to Interpretable Logical Reasoning

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A comparison of two neurosymbolic designs concludes that the hybrid design, pairing an LLM with a separate symbolic solver, is the more promising path to general logical reasoning.

Pith tools