Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 80 references

Cosmological Reconstructions in Einstein--Cartan--Myrzakulov Gravity with Torsion and Non-Metricity in the Weitzenb\"ock Geometrical Sector

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that an Einstein–Cartan–Myrzakulov gravity with torsion and non-metricity in a Weitzenböck sector can reproduce observed cosmic histories and yields testable predictions for dark energy, dark matter, and structure…

desk verdict A manuscript with an unreadable full text and an abstract that promises everything and shows nothing; not reviewable in present form. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.00026 v1 pith:U6UNMS3O submitted 2025-07-29 gr-qc

Davood Momeni , Ratbay Myrzakulov This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83D0583F05 PACS 04.50.Kd98.80.-k
keywords Einstein–Cartan–Myrzakulovgravitytorsionnon-metricityWeitzenböckspacetimecosmologicalreconstructiondarkenergymatteracceleratedexpansion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that a single modified theory of gravity—the Einstein–Cartan–Myrzakulov (ECM) model with torsion and non-metricity in the Weitzenböck geometrical sector—can account for the accelerated expansion of the universe and for the dark sector without introducing separate fields. The claim matters because it offers a purely geometric route to dark energy and dark matter, one whose expansion histories can in principle be checked against astronomical data. The paper asserts that the model reproduces observed cosmic histories and produces testable predictions comparable with current and future observations. A sympathetic reader would take the central contribution to be the demonstration, through cosmological reconstruction, that this geometric framework can be made to fit the background universe.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the Einstein–Cartan–Myrzakulov action with torsion and non-metricity in the Weitzenböck geometrical sector. Weitzenböck spacetime is a teleparallel geometry in which the connection is flat but carries torsion, and here non-metricity is included as an additional gravitational ingredient. The action contains free functions that serve as the reconstruction handles: by choosing them so that the modified Friedmann equations reproduce a target Hubble expansion, the model is tuned to observed cosmic histories. The resulting equations are what connect the geometric action to distance and growth observables.

What would settle it

A concrete test: use an independent data set not involved in the reconstruction—redshift-drift measurements, high-redshift baryon acoustic oscillations, or growth-rate estimates such as $f\sigma_8$—and ask whether the reconstructed model fits simultaneously. If the model can match the background expansion but fails the growth or distance data, its claim to reproduce observed cosmic histories is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim the paper puts forward is that the ECM model, a gravitational action incorporating curvature, torsion, and non-metricity in Weitzenböck spacetime, can be reconstructed to match the observed expansion history of the universe. In this picture, the accelerated expansion and the effects attributed to dark energy and dark matter are geometrical consequences of the underlying connection rather than separate substances. The paper further claims that the reconstructed model is not just a curve fit: it yields predictions that can be compared with current and future observational data. The intended result is that geometrically modified gravity remains a viable explanation of cosmic acceleration and structure formation.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the ECM action is a well-defined dynamical theory whose equations, in a homogeneous universe, reduce to consistent Friedmann equations while still leaving enough freedom to reproduce any chosen expansion history; if that freedom is only an input chosen to match data, the reproduced histories are not independent predictions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the ECM model is right, the accelerated expansion can be understood as a geometric effect of torsion and non-metricity, removing the need for a separate dark-energy fluid.
  • Dark-matter-like effects could be absorbed into the same geometric sector, which would change how galaxy-cluster and lensing measurements are interpreted.
  • The reconstruction procedure can be matched against independent data sets, so current and future supernova, baryon-acoustic-oscillation, and cosmic-microwave-background surveys become direct tests.
  • Structure formation happens inside the same geometry, meaning growth-rate measurements such as $f\sigma_8$ can confirm or break the model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extension: because reconstruction tunes free functions to a target expansion history, the background fit alone is likely to be degenerate; the model's real discriminative power lies in perturbation and growth data that the reconstruction does not use.
  • Extension: computing the effective dark-energy equation of state $w(z)$ from the reconstructed functions would turn the model into concrete predictions for supernova and baryon-acoustic-oscillation distances.
  • Extension: the same geometry predicts a modified relation between the gravitational potentials in lensing and in matter clustering, which weak-lensing and redshift-space-distortion surveys can measure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a modified gravity theory, Einstein–Cartan–Myrzakulov (ECM) gravity in Weitzenböck geometry, claiming that it reproduces observed cosmic histories and yields testable predictions for dark energy and dark matter. The abstract is the only readable portion; the body text is an unreadable mojibake stream. No equations, derivations, datasets, or error analyses are present, so the central claims cannot be verified from the submitted material.

Significance. If the claims were substantiated, the model would offer a unified geometric explanation of cosmic acceleration and the dark sector without extra fields, which is a significant outcome. The manuscript also carries an important methodological risk: if the reconstruction is performed by tuning a free function to the same data that are later said to be predicted, the agreement is circular. Because the technical content is unreadable, the potential significance cannot be validated. Credit cannot be given for machine-checked proofs or reproducible code, as none are provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text (all sections after the abstract)] The full text is an encoding-corrupted stream; no action, field equations, Friedmann equations, reconstruction procedure, or numerical results are legible. The abstract's central assertion that the model 'reproduces observed cosmic histories' is therefore entirely unsupported and cannot be checked.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract claims 'testable predictions that can be compared with current and future observational data.' No derivation or procedure is visible that would prevent the reconstruction from being a simple inversion of a free function to match the target Hubble history. If the free function is fitted to the data, the predictions are circular; the manuscript provides no evidence against this, because the reconstruction section is unreadable.
  3. [Full Text (overall)] No datasets, figures, tables, parameter values, or error analysis appear anywhere in the readable material. Consequently, any comparison with cosmic chronometers, supernovae, or CMB data promised by the abstract cannot be assessed, and the paper's quantitative claims are unverifiable in this form.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract reads as a broad programmatic statement rather than a technical preview; it does not state the action, the free function, or the data sets used, which compounds the difficulty of assessing the reconstruction claim.
  2. [Title] Even the title's phrase 'Cosmological Reconstructions' invites a circularity concern; the authors should clearly distinguish fitted inputs from predicted outputs once the technical text is restored.
  3. [Full Text] If the unreadable body is a submission error, the authors should re-supply a properly rendered manuscript; as it stands, no equations are available for review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be established from the provided text; the derivation chain is not readable, so the reconstruction is unverified rather than demonstrably circular.

full rationale

The supplied full text is almost entirely encoding-corrupted; the only readable portions are the abstract and the opening paragraph on General Relativity. No field equations, reconstruction equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are visible. Consequently, there is no quotable equation or passage that shows the model's 'prediction' reduces to an input by construction, and no self-citation chain is load-bearing. The abstract's phrase 'reproduces observed cosmic histories' could in principle describe a fit, but the circularity analysis requires exhibiting the specific reduction (e.g., Eq. X equals Eq. Y by construction, or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction). Without readable equations, that reduction cannot be exhibited. Lacking such evidence, the honest finding is no significant circularity, with the caveat that the manuscript's central claim is unverifiable in its present corrupted form. That unverifiability is an evidentiary gap for a correctness review, not a circularity finding under the stated rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract and a corrupted full-text stream were available. The reconstruction framing suggests at least one hand-chosen function, but its form and fitted values are absent. No new particles, forces, or mediators are named, so the invented-entities list is empty.

free parameters (1)
  • Reconstruction ansatz or free function
    The title indicates a cosmological reconstruction approach, which typically requires choosing a function or parameter set to match the target expansion history. The abstract gives no details, so any such choice would be a free parameter invisible to the reviewer.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The combined Einstein-Cartan-Myrzakulov action with torsion and non-metricity is a consistent gravitational theory whose field equations admit the FLRW background used in the reconstruction.
    The central claim of reproducing cosmic histories depends on the model being a valid dynamical theory; no field equations, stability analysis, or consistency checks are visible in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The cosmological datasets used to validate the model are external benchmarks, not the same data that determined the reconstruction.
    The abstract claims testable predictions, but it never distinguishes fitted inputs from independent predictions. The reconstruction method often blurs this line, so the status of the data is an unstated load-bearing assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cosmological Reconstructions in Einstein--Cartan--Myrzakulov Gravity with Torsion and Non-Metricity in the Weitzenb\"ock Geometrical Sector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/U6UNMS3O

@misc{pith2026250800026,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cosmological Reconstructions in Einstein--Cartan--Myrzakulov Gravity with Torsion and Non-Metricity in the Weitzenb\"ock Geometrical Sector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/U6UNMS3O}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.00026}
}
read the original abstract

The universe is a vast and complex system, and our understanding of its fundamental workings is constantly evolving. In this work, we present a novel modification to the standard theory of gravity by incorporating curvature, torsion, non-metricity, and the geometric structure of Weitzenb\"{o}ck spacetime. This modified framework, referred to as the Einstein--Cartan--Myrzakulov (ECM) model, enriched by Weitzenb\"{o}ck geometry, offers new insights into cosmological phenomena, including the accelerated expansion of the universe, the nature of dark energy and dark matter, and the formation of cosmic structures. Our model not only reproduces observed cosmic histories but also provides testable predictions that can be compared with current and future observational data. By addressing some of the most profound questions in modern cosmology, this work paves the way for a deeper understanding of the universe's evolution and the fundamental forces that govern it. The ECM model, extended through Weitzenb\"{o}ck spacetime, invites further exploration, offering the potential to revolutionize our conception of gravity and the cosmos.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess, A. V. Filippenko, P. Challis, et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter, G

    S. Perlmutter, G. Aldering, G. Goldhaber, et al., Measurements of \( \) and \( \) from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, ``Dynamics of dark energy,'' International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 15, pp. 1753–1936 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0603057

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    A. A. Starobinsky, ``A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,'' Physics Letters B, vol. 91, pp. 99–102 (1980)

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    D. J. Eisenstein, I. Zehavi, H. J. Seo, et al., Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of the SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 633, 560 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) theories of gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Y. F. Cai, S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, and E. N. Saridakis, f(T) gravity, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79, 106901 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    J. B. Jimenez, L. Heisenberg, and T. S. Koivisto, f(Q) gravity: A unifying perspective, Phys. Rev. D 98, 044048 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Beltrán Jiménez, A

    J. Beltrán Jiménez, A. D. Felice, and L. Heisenberg, Hybrid metric-Palatini f(R) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 102, 024030 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Harko, F

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, f(R, T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 85, 084036 (2012)

    2012

  4. [12]

    Capozziello, G

    S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase, and C. Stornaiolo, Cosmological solutions in the frame of Noether symmetries, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 5, 263 (1996)

    1996

  5. [13]

    Paliathanasis, S

    A. Paliathanasis, S. Capozziello, and M. Tsamparlis, Noether symmetries and exact solutions in modified gravity models, JCAP 1410, 023 (2014)

    2014

  6. [14]

    A. F. Santos, Energy conditions in extended theories of gravity, Phys. Rev. D 75, 023502 (2007)

    2007

  7. [15]

    Banados, A

    M. Banados, A. Gomberoff, and C. Martínez, Anti-de Sitter space-time and Noether symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 80, 105021 (2009)

    2009

  8. [16]

    Ferraro and F

    R. Ferraro and F. Fiorini, Modified teleparallel gravity: Inflation without an inflaton field, Phys. Rev. D 75, 084031 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    G. R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro, Dark energy and the acceleration of the universe in modified teleparallel gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124019 (2009)

    2009

  10. [18]

    Myrzakulov, Accelerating universe from modified teleparallel gravity, Eur

    R. Myrzakulov, Accelerating universe from modified teleparallel gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 2203 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    Krssak and E

    M. Krssak and E. N. Saridakis, Covariant formulation of modified teleparallel gravity: The case of f(T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104022 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    Bamba, C

    K. Bamba, C. Q. Geng, C. C. Lee, and L. W. Liao, Trace-anomaly-driven inflation in f(T) gravity and its compatibility with bigravity frameworks, JCAP 1401, 005 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Nesseris, A

    S. Nesseris, A. De Felice, and S. Tsujikawa, Observational constraints on f(T) gravity, JCAP 1307, 033 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    Abedi, M

    H. Abedi, M. S. Ghaffari, and A. Mohammadi, Gravitational wave propagation in f(T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 96, 104042 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Abedi, M

    H. Abedi, M. S. Ghaffari, and A. Mohammadi, Gravitational waves in modified teleparallel gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 98, 024038 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Capozziello, S

    S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, Black holes in modified gravity, Phys. Lett. B 634, 93 (2006)

    2006

  17. [25]

    Capozziello, M

    S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, and V. Faraoni, Noether symmetries in f(T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89, 044016 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    Capozziello, V

    S. Capozziello, V. Faraoni, and D. J. Schwarz, Higher-order gravity and its cosmological applications, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29, 2041003 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    de Martino, R

    I. de Martino, R. Ferraro, and F. Fiorini, Unification of curvature and torsion in f(T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 92, 084017 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Balhara, R

    S. Balhara, R. K. Yadav, and M. S. R. Delos, Cosmographic constraints on f(T, T_G) theories, JCAP 2302, 056 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Asimakis, A

    G. Asimakis, A. P. Youssef, and E. N. Saridakis, Refined models of f(T, T_G) gravity and their cosmological implications, JCAP 2208, 020 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Kapsabelis, A

    S. Kapsabelis, A. Paliathanasis, and M. Tsamparlis, Finsler geometries and cosmological extensions of f(T) gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 045013 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    Mylova, A

    A. Mylova, A. L. Berenstein, and V. L. Matus, Effective field theory approach to teleparallel gravity, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043534 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    X. Zhao, H. Wei, and Y. Zhang, Black hole quasinormal modes in modified teleparallel gravity, JCAP 2206, 044 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    G. Leon, C. P. Romo, and E. N. Saridakis, Unified dark sector models with scalar fields and torsion in f(T) gravity, JCAP 2205, 033 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    J. Ren, Y. Liu, and Q. Fu, Resolving the Hubble tension in f(T) gravity using Gaussian processes, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024028 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Papagiannopoulos, N

    G. Papagiannopoulos, N. Dimakis, and A. K. Pandey, Dynamical system analysis of modified gravity theories, Phys. Rev. D 106, 074027 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    G. G. L. Nashed, Thermodynamical analysis of charged black holes in modified teleparallel gravity, Phys. Rev. D 103, 064041 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Momeni and R

    D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 64 (2025) no.4, 95 doi:10.1007/s10773-025-05966-y [arXiv:2504.02002 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Momeni and R

    D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov, Nucl. Phys. B 1015 (2025), 116903 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116903 [arXiv:2412.04524 [gr-qc]]

    2025

  31. [39]

    Momeni and R

    D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov, ``Inflation in Myrzakulov F(R,T) Gravity: A Comparative Study in Metric, Symmetric Teleparallel, and Weitzenb\" o ck Formalisms,'' To appear in Nucl. Phys. B (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Momeni and R

    D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov, Nucl. Phys. B 1018, 117042 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.117042

    2025

  33. [41]

    Momeni and R

    D. Momeni and R. Myrzakulov, Nucl. Phys. B 1017, 116966 (2025) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116966 [arXiv:2505.18285 [gr-qc]]

    2025

  34. [42]

    Kofinas and E

    G. Kofinas and E. N. Saridakis, ``Teleparallel equivalent of Gauss-Bonnet gravity and its modifications,'' Phys.\ Rev.\ D 90, 084044 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Modified Gauss-Bonnet gravity as a candidate for the dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 631, 1-6 (2005)

    2005

  36. [44]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, The f(R) gravity and cosmology, Gen. Rel. Grav. 40, 357-371 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Fonseca et al., A new neutron star mass measurement from X-ray timing observations, Nature 593, 211-214 (2021)

    E. Fonseca et al., A new neutron star mass measurement from X-ray timing observations, Nature 593, 211-214 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    B. P. Abbott et al., GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Physical Review Letters 119, 161101 (2017)

    2017

  39. [47]

    Heisenberg, A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications, arXiv:1807.01725 (2018)

    L. Heisenberg, A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications, arXiv:1807.01725 (2018)

    2018 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Heisenberg, Recent Advances in f(Q) Gravity and its Cosmological Applications, arXiv:2309.15958 (2023)

    L. Heisenberg, Recent Advances in f(Q) Gravity and its Cosmological Applications, arXiv:2309.15958 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Heisenberg et al., The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity: Curvature, Torsion, and Non-Metricity, arXiv:1903.06830 (2019)

    L. Heisenberg et al., The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity: Curvature, Torsion, and Non-Metricity, arXiv:1903.06830 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, 39 (1922)

    E. Cartan, Sur les variétés à connexion affine, Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure, 39 (1922)

    1922

  43. [51]

    General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects,

    F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, D. Kerlick, and J. Nester, "General Relativity with Spin and Torsion: Foundations and Prospects," Rev. Mod. Phys., 48, 393-416 (1976)

    1976

  44. [52]

    Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, 2008

    S. Weinberg, Cosmology, Oxford University Press, 2008

    2008

  45. [53]

    Blagojević, Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2002

    M. Blagojević, Gravitation and Gauge Symmetries, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2002

    2002

  46. [54]

    Saha and N

    B. Saha and N. Rudra, ``Holographic reconstruction of dark energy models in f(Q) gravity,'' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 1-16, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Gadbail, N

    D. Gadbail, N. A. Bukhari, and R. S. Agnew, ``Cosmological constraints on f(Q) gravity models,'' Phys. Rev. D, vol. 107, no. 5, pp. 45-57, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and M. Sasaki, ``The modified gravity theory, the cosmological models and dark energy,'' Phys. Lett. B, vol. 639, pp. 2-12, 2006

    2006

  49. [57]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, and D. Sezgin, ``Modified F(G) gravity and its cosmological reconstruction,'' JHEP, vol. 2009, no. 11, pp. 123-130, 2009

    2009

  50. [58]

    Jamil, E

    M. Jamil, E. N. Saridakis, and M. R. Setare, ``Reconstruction of cosmological models in f(R,T) gravity,'' Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 72, pp. 1732-1739, 2012

    2012

  51. [59]

    Bamba, C

    K. Bamba, C. Q. Geng, and C. K. Yeh, ``Reconstruction of f(T) gravity,'' JCAP, vol. 06, pp. 25-33, 2012

    2012

  52. [60]

    Capozziello, ``Curvature quintessence,'' Int

    S. Capozziello, ``Curvature quintessence,'' Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1005-1015, 2008

    2008

  53. [61]

    Harko, F

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, and S. Nojiri, ``f(R,T) gravity,'' JCAP, vol. 06, pp. 17-28, 2011

    2011

  54. [62]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, ``Modified f(R) gravity and its cosmological implications,'' Phys. Rep., vol. 505, pp. 59-144, 2008

    2008

  55. [63]

    Capozziello, M

    S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, and V. F. Cardone, ``Extended theories of gravity,'' JCAP, vol. 10, pp. 19-30, 2010

    2010

  56. [64]

    Harko, F

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, and T. Odintsov, ``f(T) theories,'' Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, vol. 21, pp. 123-133, 2012

    2012

  57. [65]

    Bamba, S

    K. Bamba, S. Nojiri, and S. D. Odintsov, ``Dark energy cosmology from modified gravity,'' Phys. Lett. B, vol. 683, pp. 109-115, 2010

    2010

  58. [66]

    Sadeghi, M

    J. Sadeghi, M. R. Setare, and N. Mohammadipour, ``Reconstruction of f(R) gravity,'' Int. J. Theor. Phys., vol. 51, pp. 210-218, 2012

    2012

  59. [67]

    Capozziello, Ruchika, and A

    S. Capozziello, Ruchika, and A. A. Sen, ``Model-independent reconstruction of dark energy equation of state from low-redshift data,'' Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., vol. 484, no. 4, pp. 4484–4492, 2019

    2019

  60. [68]

    A. G. Riess et al., ``Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant,'' The Astronomical Journal, vol. 116, pp. 1009--1038, 1998, doi 10.1086/300499

    1998 doi

  61. [69]

    Perlmutter et al., ``Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae,'' The Astrophysical Journal, vol

    S. Perlmutter et al., ``Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae,'' The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 517, pp. 565--586, 1999, doi 10.1086/307221

    1999 doi

  62. [70]

    Mukherjee et al., ``Modified gravity theories and cosmology,'' Physics Reports, vol

    A. Mukherjee et al., ``Modified gravity theories and cosmology,'' Physics Reports, vol. 861, pp. 1--97, 2020, doi 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.001

    2020 doi

  63. [71]

    Clifton et al., ``Modified gravity and cosmology,'' Physics Reports, vol

    T. Clifton et al., ``Modified gravity and cosmology,'' Physics Reports, vol. 513, pp. 1--189, 2012, doi 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001

    2012 doi

  64. [72]

    Alam et al., ``Cosmic constraints on modified gravity theories from the Hubble parameter,'' Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol

    S. Alam et al., ``Cosmic constraints on modified gravity theories from the Hubble parameter,'' Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2020, no. 8, p. 013, 2020, doi 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/08/013

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    N. J. Popławski, Nonsingular big bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling, Phys. Lett. B 694, 181 (2010)

    2010

  66. [74]

    J. S. Bullock and M. Boylan-Kolchin, Small-scale challenges to the \( \)CDM paradigm, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 343 (2017)

    2017

  67. [75]

    I. L. Shapiro, Physical aspects of the space-time torsion, Phys. Rept. 357, 113 (2002)

    2002

  68. [76]

    Gasperini, Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory, Phys

    M. Gasperini, Spin-dominated inflation in the Einstein-Cartan theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2873 (1986)

    1986

  69. [77]

    N. J. Popławski, Nonsingular, big-bounce cosmology from spinor-torsion coupling, Phys. Rev. D 85, 107502 (2012)

    2012

  70. [78]

    V. A. Kostelecký and N. Russell, Data tables for Lorentz and CPT violation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 11 (2011)

    2011

  71. [79]

    Puetzfeld and Y

    D. Puetzfeld and Y. N. Obukhov, ``Propagation equations for metric-affine gravity,'' Phys. Rev. D 71, 084015 (2005)

    2005

  72. [80]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford University Press, 2007

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford University Press, 2007

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.