REVIEW 1 cited by
Astronomical Classification of Light Curves with an Ensemble of Gated Recurrent Units
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
With an ever-increasing amount of astronomical data being collected, manual classification has become obsolete; and machine learning is the only way forward. Keeping this in mind, the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Team hosted the Photometric LSST Astronomical Time-Series Classification Challenge (PLAsTiCC) in 2018. The aim of this challenge was to develop models that accurately classify astronomical sources into different classes, scaling from a limited training set to a large test set. In this text, we report our results of experimenting with Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) based deep learning models to deal with time series data of the PLAsTiCC dataset. We demonstrate that GRUs are indeed suitable to handle time series data. With minimum preprocessing and without augmentation, our stacked ensemble of GRU and Dense networks achieves an accuracy of 76.243%. Data from astronomical surveys such as LSST will help researchers answer questions pertaining to dark matter, dark energy and the origins of the universe; accurate classification of astronomical sources is the first step towards achieving this. Our code is open-source and has been made available on GitHub here: https://github.com/AKnightWing/Astronomical-Classification-PLASTICC
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Real-time Light Curve Classification Framework for the Wide Field Survey Telescope Using Modified Semi-supervised Variational Auto-Encoder
A semi-supervised variational autoencoder that reconstructs a full light curve from the first three days of data classifies simulated transients with 83.1% accuracy, 5.59% relative improvement over a GRU baseline.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.