Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

One-loop corrections to infrared GWs is forbidden by symmetries

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Small-scale scalar perturbations in non-attractor inflation induce no one-loop corrections to the superhorizon tensor power spectrum: the two leading diagrams cancel, and a Ward identity proves the absence directly from a metric-plus-coordi

desk verdict The direct one-loop cancellation is likely right, but the new Ward identity proof overreaches: it jumps from a global constraint to a mode-by-mode statement that fails for subhorizon modes. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.00420 v1 pith:UWGFMHHG submitted 2025-08-30 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-ph

Cheng-Jun Fang , Han-Wen Hu , Zong-Kuan Guo This is my paper
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-ph PACS 98.80.Cq
keywords one-loopcorrectionstensorperturbationsprimordialgravitationalwavesWardidentitynon-attractorinflationsuperhorizonspectrumparametricresonancescalarmodefunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to settle a disputed question: in non-attractor single-field inflation with a small first slow-roll parameter, do small-scale scalar perturbations amplified during inflation shift the long-wavelength (superhorizon) tensor power spectrum at one loop? The authors claim the answer is no: the two leading one-loop diagrams cancel exactly, and this cancellation is not an accident of the diagrams but is forced by a symmetry of the interacting action. If true, the one-loop superhorizon tensor spectrum equals the free spectrum, and earlier calculations reporting large infrared corrections were artifacts of using scalar mode functions that do not solve the equation of motion. The result extends the authors' previous scalar-sector proof to tensor perturbations, showing a common symmetry protects both.

What carries the argument

The central object is the residual symmetry of the interacting action: h_ij(x) → h_ij(x + M·x) + 2M_ij with δϕ(x) unchanged, where M_ij is a constant symmetric traceless tensor; the associated Ward identity (⟨Ω|[Q̂, ĥ_ij]|Ω⟩ = −⟨δĥ_ij⟩) forces the long-wavelength two-point function to satisfy ⟨h h⟩ = ⟨h h⟩ + c.c., which is exactly the one-loop cancellation condition. The computational workhorse is the integral identity (3.7): for any mode function u_k solving N̂_k u_k = 0, d/d log k |u_k|² = −2k² ∫ dτ G_k(τ1; τ) 2Re[u_k(τ)u*_k(τ1)], which flips diagram 1a into minus diagram 1b. The identity's proof (Appendix A) uses Bunch–Davies early-time asymptotics, a Green's function with a chosen integr

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the two one-loop diagram integrals (3.5) and (3.6) for a concrete parametric-resonance model using the exact mode function u_k obtained by integrating the scalar equation of motion, and check whether their sum vanishes as the external momentum q → 0 on superhorizon scales; repeat the test with a non-Bunch–Davies initial state to see whether Eq. (3.7) still holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that in single-field inflation with a small first slow-roll parameter throughout, the superhorizon tensor power spectrum is protected at one loop: small-scale scalar fluctuations do not generate infrared corrections to long-wavelength gravitational waves. The direct Dyson-series calculation isolates the two dominant one-loop diagrams, 3a (two three-point vertices) and 3b (four-point vertex); an exact integral identity for scalar mode functions makes the two contractions opposite, so their sum vanishes for superhorizon q. A separate Ward identity, derived from the symmetry h_ij → h_ij + 2M_ij with coordinate shift x → x − M·x, enforces the same cancellation. Earlier claims of

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the integral identity (3.7), whose proof assumes Bunch–Davies early-time mode functions, a Green's function with a properly chosen integration path, and uniqueness of solutions to the partial differential equation; if any of those fails, say through boundary terms or a non-Bunch–Davies vacuum, the cancellation breaks down and the one-loop correction can reappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The one-loop superhorizon tensor power spectrum in the considered models equals the free spectrum; earlier predictions of large infrared gravitational waves from small-scale scalar spikes would be spurious artifacts of off-shell mode functions.
  • Because the Ward identity proves the absence without loop integrals, the same conclusion transfers to any model respecting the symmetry, not just the specific resonance scenario used in the direct calculation.
  • Observational forecasts for the stochastic gravitational-wave background and CMB B-modes built on the earlier one-loop corrections should be revised downward at the infrared end.
  • Combined with the authors' scalar-sector result, the symmetry protects both scalar and tensor long-wavelength perturbations at one loop, strengthening the view that superhorizon correlators are conserved in these models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the integral identity (3.7) extends to higher n-point functions, the same cancellation should appear in soft tensor limits of mixed correlators such as ⟨h δϕ δϕ⟩, which the paper does not compute and would be a direct test.
  • The proof's reliance on Bunch–Davies early-time initial conditions suggests an excited initial vacuum is the most plausible loophole; testing the cancellation with excited states is a concrete extension.
  • A practical diagnostic emerges: any loop calculation whose scalar mode functions fail the Wronskian test will generically produce spurious infrared corrections, a check applicable to future computations in other gauges.
  • A numerical lattice or in-in computation with fully on-shell mode functions could verify whether the one-loop cancellation is the leading symptom of a non-perturbative conservation law.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper addresses the controversy over one-loop corrections to the superhorizon tensor power spectrum in single-field inflation with a transient non-slow-roll phase. In the spatially flat gauge and assuming a small first slow-roll parameter, it computes the two dominant third-order diagrams for the tensor two-point function and claims their contributions cancel exactly, Eq. (3.9), using an integral identity Eq. (3.7) for scalar mode functions. It then derives a Ward identity from the symmetry h_ij -> h_ij + 2M_ij accompanied by a coordinate shift, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.20), and concludes that no one-loop infrared corrections exist and no diagram-by-diagram calculation is needed. The paper is restricted to one-loop order; the authors explicitly state that higher-loop tensor statements are not made because of gauge ambiguities.

Significance. If established, the result would settle a live controversy by showing that earlier loop calculations used mode functions that do not satisfy the equations of motion, and it would provide a symmetry-based explanation analogous to the scalar case. The direct diagrammatic expressions are explicit, and the claimed cancellation in Eq. (3.9) is a concrete, falsifiable statement. The paper is also honest about its one-loop limitation. However, as detailed below, the proof of the central integral identity is incomplete, and the Ward-identity derivation contains a serious gap; the current version does not establish the title claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.7), Appendix A] The one-loop cancellation hinges on the integral identity Eq. (3.7). Its proof in Appendix A is not sufficient. The authors introduce C_k and g_k, show that (N_τ1+N_τ2)g_k = 0, and then argue that g_k vanishes at early times using the Bunch-Davies form Eq. (A.9) and a 'properly chosen integration path'. The path is never specified, no boundary terms are analyzed, and the claimed uniqueness theorem for the partial differential equation is not stated. More importantly, the verification uses the vacuum-mode form; if the scalar mode function or the initial state is not Bunch-Davies at τ_i, or if boundary terms in the time integrations do not vanish, g_k need not be zero and Eq. (3.8) would fail. Since Eq. (3.9) is the central direct-calculation result, this gap is load-bearing. The integration by parts in log p leading to Eq. (3.8) also needs a boundary-term check.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.18)-(4.20)] The step from Eq. (4.18) to Eq. (4.20) is not justified. Eq. (4.18) is a single global constraint involving h_kl(0) = ∫ d^3p/(2π)^3 h_kl(p). Eq. (4.19) replaces this by an integral over solid angle only, omitting the |p|^2 dp/(2π)^3 radial measure, and is not the proper spectral decomposition of h_ij(0). Consequently Eq. (4.20) does not follow from Eq. (4.18). In fact, Eq. (4.20) fails at tree level for a free tensor mode with q|τ_i| ≫ 1 and q|τ| ≪ 1: using v_q(τ) = iH/(M_p√(2q^3))(1+iqτ)e^{-iqτ}, the left side is of order (H^2/M_p^2 q^3) q^2 τ_i^2, while the right side is of order (H^2/M_p^2 q^3) q|τ_i|. The symmetry argument as written therefore does not establish the mode-by-mode Ward identity, and the paper's main claim that one-loop corrections are 'forbidden by symmetries' rests on an unproven statement.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.8)] In passing from Eq. (3.6) to Eq. (3.8), the external mode is approximated as frozen, v_q(τ'') -> v_q(τ). This is only valid when the external mode is already superhorizon at all times τ'' in the integration domain. The paper states this 'by default' but does not quantify the error for modes that cross the horizon near the end of the intermediate phase, nor does it specify the sense in which the cancellation is exact rather than a leading-order large-scale limit. A controlled statement of the superhorizon limit is needed for Eq. (3.9) to be used as a precise result.
  4. [Sec. 2 and Sec. 3] The paper's explanation for the discrepancy with earlier loop calculations is that the earlier parameterizations did not satisfy the equation of motion, as seen from the Wronskian. This is an important claim, but the manuscript does not demonstrate it explicitly for the cited references; it would strengthen the paper to show, for a representative mode function from Refs. [36,37], exactly where the Wronskian or the on-shell condition fails and how that failure feeds into the nonzero one-loop result.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (4.19)] The notation h^s_hat q is not defined; the main text uses h_q^s in Eq. (3.1). Please make the polarization/momentum notation consistent.
  2. [Appendix A] Typo: 'partial derivative equation' should be 'partial differential equation'. Also, 'eigen states' should be hyphenated as 'eigenstates'.
  3. [Eqs. (2.9)-(2.10)] The Green's functions are defined with factors of i/a(τ')^2. Please spell out the sign and normalization conventions, since these factors affect the intermediate signs in the diagrammatic expressions.
  4. [Eq. (4.14)] The expansion (1 + M_ij D0 h_ij(0) + V) appears with a sign that is not fully derived; a short derivation or a sign convention note would help.
  5. [General] There are a number of small grammatical issues, e.g., 'It is also necessary' in Sec. 1, and 'we noticed' should be 'we note'. These do not affect the substance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the one-loop cancellation and Ward identity are derived from equations of motion and action symmetry, not from the target result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that small-scale scalar perturbations do not generate infrared one-loop corrections to the tensor power spectrum. The direct calculation in Sec. 3 computes the two dominant diagrams, (3.5) and (3.6), and shows they cancel using the integral identity (3.7). That identity is not assumed: Appendix A derives it from the scalar equation of motion N_k u_k = 0 and a Bunch-Davies initial condition, with the uniqueness argument for the PDE satisfied by g_k. This is a mathematical lemma, not an input equivalent to the cancellation. The Ward identity derivation in Sec. 4 starts from the symmetry transformation (4.2), verifies invariance of the action (4.3), and obtains the matrix element of the charge from the Gaussian early-time wave function, leading to the constraints (4.18)-(4.20). The final constraint is claimed to reproduce the one-loop cancellation, but the derivation is from the symmetry rather than from an assumed absence of corrections. No parameters are fitted, and no benchmark is tuned. The self-citation of the authors' scalar result [67] is contextual (Introduction and Discussion) and is not used as a premise for the tensor one-loop or Ward identity calculation; the relevant symmetry transformation is attributed to external references [75,76]. The acknowledged limitations (one-loop only, gauge dependence at higher orders) are consistency caveats, not circular reasoning. The potentially questionable step from the global Ward identity (4.18) to the mode-by-mode statement (4.20) is a mathematical-validity concern, not a circularity: it does not reduce the conclusion to its own input. Therefore no circular step can be exhibited and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical free parameters are fitted. The derivation rests on standard inflationary perturbation theory assumptions: Bunch-Davies initial state, small epsilon, Gaussian initial wavefunction, and the cited k^3 suppression of the h^(2)h^(2) diagram. The symmetry transformation is not a new entity; Q is the standard symmetry generator. The most load-bearing axiom is the integral relation Eq. (3.7) and its proof in Appendix A.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The initial inflationary vacuum is the free Bunch-Davies vacuum with mode function u_k = iH/sqrt(2k^3)(1+ikτ)e^{-ikτ}.
    Used in Appendix A to set g_k = 0 at early times, which is needed for the integral relation Eq. (3.7).
  • domain assumption Lapse and shift can be neglected because the first slow-roll parameter epsilon is small.
    The ADM action in Eqs. (2.1)-(2.2) drops N and N^i as 'suppressed by epsilon'; this is the interaction action used for the loop calculation.
  • standard math The action is invariant under the constant tensor shift plus coordinate transformation h -> h + 2M, x -> x - M x, at the order used.
    Verified in Eq. (4.3) by cancellation of first-order variations; it generates the Ward identity Eq. (4.4).
  • domain assumption The early-time wavefunction is Gaussian, and the extra terms V and the scalar-part contribution vanish because M is traceless and the background is isotropic.
    Appendix B argues Delta epsilon_k and V drop out by isotropy and tracelessness; this is necessary to obtain Eqs. (4.16)-(4.18).
  • domain assumption The h^(2)h^(2) diagram is k^3 suppressed in the IR, so only the h^(1)h^(3) diagrams need to be cancelled.
    The paper cites [36,37,57,74] for this suppression and does not compute the h^(2)h^(2) diagram itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of One-loop corrections to infrared GWs is forbidden by symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UWGFMHHG

@misc{pith2026250900420,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: One-loop corrections to infrared GWs is forbidden by symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UWGFMHHG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.00420}
}
read the original abstract

Small-scale scalar perturbations amplified during inflation can induce primordial gravitational waves through tensor-scalar interactions. A long-standing controversial issue is whether the one-loop corrections to tensor perturbations exist on large scales. Firstly, we demonstrate through direct one-loop calculations that one-loop corrections cancel each other out on large scales. We then proceed from the symmetry of the interacting system and directly prove, based on the Ward identity, the absence of one-loop corrections on large scales-without the need for specific loop diagram calculations. This is consistent with the results we previously obtained for scalar perturbations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.00420 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. one-loop order tensor diagrams. seem to be related. However, as long as the scalar mode function satisfies the equation of motion Nˆ kuk = 0, it will satisfy an integral expression d d log k |uk| 2 = −2k 2 Z τ1 dτGk (τ1; τ ) 2 Re [uk(τ )u ∗ k (τ1)] . (3.7) The specific proof will be provided in Appendix A. With the help of this integral relation, we can further simplify the results in Fig.1b as D h r,(1) −q h s,(3a)… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Matching second-order classical and 1-loop quantum tensor power spectra in de Sitter spacetime

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Classical part of 1-loop tensor power spectrum in de Sitter is IR divergent but cancels with vacuum part, enabling non-perturbative renormalization to extract unaffected physical information.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [72]

    Cancellation of one-loop correction to soft tensor power spectrum,

    Y. Ema, M. Hong, R. Jinno, and K. Mukaida, “Cancellation of one-loop correction to soft tensor power spectrum,” arXiv:2506.15780 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 347–356

    work page 1981

  3. [2]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91 (1980) 99–102

    1980

  4. [3]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,” Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A10, arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2018

  5. [4]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,

    Planck Collaboration, Y. Akrami et al., “Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A9, arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2018

  6. [5]

    The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,

    ACT Collaboration, T. Louis et al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters,” arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  7. [6]

    The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample,

    BOSS Collaboration, S. Alam et al., “The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.470 no. 3, (2017) 2617–2652, arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [7]

    DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame et al., “DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,” JCAP 02 (2025) 021, arXiv:2404.03002 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 78 references
  1. [8]

    DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements,

    DESI Collaboration, A. G. Adame et al., “DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements,” JCAP 07 (2025) 028, arXiv:2411.12022 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations,” Phys. Lett. B117 (1982) 175–178

    1982

  3. [10]

    Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,” Phys. Rept.215 (1992) 203–333

    1992

  4. [11]

    Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,

    A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, “Primordial Black Holes as a dark matter candidate,” J. Phys. G 48 no. 4, (2021) 043001, arXiv:2007.10722 [astro-ph.CO]. 11

    2021 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70 (2020) 355–394, arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,

    KAGRA, VIRGO, LIGO Scientific Collaboration, R. Abbott et al., “Population of Merging Compact Binaries Inferred Using Gravitational Waves through GWTC-3,” Phys. Rev. X13 no. 1, (2023) 011048, arXiv:2111.03634 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [14]

    NANOGrav Data Hints at Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,

    V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, “NANOGrav Data Hints at Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126 no. 4, (2021) 041303, arXiv:2009.08268 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [15]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars,

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Observations and Timing of 68 Millisecond Pulsars,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L9, arXiv:2306.16217 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  9. [16]

    The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,

    NANOGrav Collaboration, G. Agazie et al., “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L8, arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [17]

    The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,

    A. Zic et al., “The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array third data release,” Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral. 40 (2023) e049, arXiv:2306.16230 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,

    D. J. Reardon et al., “Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,” Astrophys. J. Lett.951 no. 1, (2023) L6, arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [19]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,

    EPTA, InPTA: Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals,” Astron. Astrophys. 678 (2023) A50, arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis,

    EPTA Collaboration, J. Antoniadis et al., “The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - I. The dataset and timing analysis,” Astron. Astrophys.678 (2023) A48, arXiv:2306.16224 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,

    H. Xu et al., “Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I,” Res. Astron. Astrophys.23 no. 7, (2023) 075024, arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Violation of non-Gaussianity consistency relation in a single field inflationary model,

    M. H. Namjoo, H. Firouzjahi, and M. Sasaki, “Violation of non-Gaussianity consistency relation in a single field inflationary model,” EPL 101 no. 3, (2013) 39001, arXiv:1210.3692 [astro-ph.CO]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation,

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, “Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation,” Phys. Dark Univ.18 (2017) 47–54, arXiv:1702.03901 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [24]

    On primordial black holes from an inflection point,

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, “On primordial black holes from an inflection point,” Phys. Dark Univ. 18 (2017) 6–10, arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO]. 12

    2017 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation,

    H. Motohashi and W. Hu, “Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation,” Phys. Rev. D 96 no. 6, (2017) 063503, arXiv:1706.06784 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Gravitational waves from double-inflection-point inflation,

    W.-T. Xu, J. Liu, T.-J. Gao, and Z.-K. Guo, “Gravitational waves from double-inflection-point inflation,” Phys. Rev. D101 no. 2, (2020) 023505, arXiv:1907.05213 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Scalar induced gravitational waves in inflation with gravitationally enhanced friction,

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, “Scalar induced gravitational waves in inflation with gravitationally enhanced friction,” Phys. Rev. D101 no. 2, (2020) 023529, arXiv:1912.05927 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Primordial Black Holes from Sound Speed Resonance during Inflation,

    Y.-F. Cai, X. Tong, D.-G. Wang, and S.-F. Yan, “Primordial Black Holes from Sound Speed Resonance during Inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121 no. 8, (2018) 081306, arXiv:1805.03639 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [29]

    When Primordial Black Holes from Sound Speed Resonance Meet a Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves,

    Y.-F. Cai, C. Chen, X. Tong, D.-G. Wang, and S.-F. Yan, “When Primordial Black Holes from Sound Speed Resonance Meet a Stochastic Background of Gravitational Waves,” Phys. Rev. D100 no. 4, (2019) 043518, arXiv:1902.08187 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from parametric amplification of curvature perturbations,

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, J. Liu, L. Liu, and X.-Y. Yang, “Primordial black holes and gravitational waves from parametric amplification of curvature perturbations,” JCAP 06 (2020) 013, arXiv:1912.10437 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case,

    K. Inomata, M. Braglia, X. Chen, and S. Renaux-Petel, “Questions on calculation of primordial power spectrum with large spikes: the resonance model case,” JCAP 04 (2023) 011, arXiv:2211.02586 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: JCAP 09, E01 (2023)]

    2023 arXiv

  25. [32]

    The Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Non-Perturbative Dynamics From Small-Scale Features,

    A. Caravano, K. Inomata, and S. Renaux-Petel, “The Inflationary Butterfly Effect: Non-Perturbative Dynamics From Small-Scale Features,” arXiv:2403.12811 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  26. [33]

    Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation,

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, “Constraining Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132 no. 22, (2024) 221003, arXiv:2211.03395 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [34]

    Power spectrum of primordial perturbations during ultra-slow-roll inflation with back reaction effects,

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee, and K.-W. Ng, “Power spectrum of primordial perturbations during ultra-slow-roll inflation with back reaction effects,” Phys. Lett. B827 (Apr., 2022) 136956, arXiv:2106.09275 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [35]

    Note on the bispectrum and one-loop corrections in single-field inflation with primordial black hole formation,

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, “Note on the bispectrum and one-loop corrections in single-field inflation with primordial black hole formation,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 10, (May,

  29. [36]

    Scale-invariant enhancement of gravitational waves during inflation,

    A. Ota, M. Sasaki, and Y. Wang, “Scale-invariant enhancement of gravitational waves during inflation,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A38 no. 12n13, (2023) 2350063, arXiv:2209.02272 [astro-ph.CO]. 13

    2023 arXiv

  30. [37]

    One-loop tensor power spectrum from an excited scalar field during inflation,

    A. Ota, M. Sasaki, and Y. Wang, “One-loop tensor power spectrum from an excited scalar field during inflation,” Phys. Rev. D108 no. 4, (2023) 043542, arXiv:2211.12766 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  31. [38]

    Symmetries and Loops in Inflation,

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann, and D. Green, “Symmetries and Loops in Inflation,” JHEP 02 (2013) 151, arXiv:1210.7792 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [39]

    The constancy of ζ in single-clock Inflation at all loops,

    L. Senatore and M. Zaldarriaga, “The constancy of ζ in single-clock Inflation at all loops,” JHEP 09 (2013) 148, arXiv:1210.6048 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Conservation of ζ with radiative corrections from heavy field,

    T. Tanaka and Y. Urakawa, “Conservation of ζ with radiative corrections from heavy field,” JCAP 06 (2016) 020, arXiv:1510.05059 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [41]

    One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation,

    H. Firouzjahi, “One-loop corrections in power spectrum in single field inflation,” JCAP 10 (2023) 006, arXiv:2303.12025 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Revisiting loop corrections in single field ultraslow-roll inflation,

    H. Firouzjahi, “Revisiting loop corrections in single field ultraslow-roll inflation,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 4, (Feb., 2024) 043514, arXiv:2311.04080 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [43]

    Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics,

    J. Fumagalli, “Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics,” JHEP 05 (2025) 162, arXiv:2305.19263 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Comparing sharp and smooth transitions of the second slow-roll parameter in single-field inflation,

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, “Comparing sharp and smooth transitions of the second slow-roll parameter in single-field inflation,” JCAP 10 (Oct., 2024) 036, arXiv:2405.12145

    2024 arXiv

  38. [45]

    No-go for the formation of heavy mass Primordial Black Holes in Single Field Inflation,

    S. Choudhury, M. R. Gangopadhyay, and M. Sami, “No-go for the formation of heavy mass Primordial Black Holes in Single Field Inflation,” Eur. Phys. J. C84 no. 9, (2024) 884, arXiv:2301.10000 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [46]

    Perturbativity in the presence of ultraslow-roll dynamics,

    G. Franciolini, A. Iovino, Junior., M. Taoso, and A. Urbano, “Perturbativity in the presence of ultraslow-roll dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D109 no. 12, (2024) 123550, arXiv:2305.03491 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Loop corrections in the separate universe picture,

    L. Iacconi, D. Mulryne, and D. Seery, “Loop corrections in the separate universe picture,” JCAP 06 (2024) 062, arXiv:2312.12424 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [48]

    Numerical 1-loop correction from a potential yielding ultra-slow-roll dynamics,

    M. W. Davies, L. Iacconi, and D. J. Mulryne, “Numerical 1-loop correction from a potential yielding ultra-slow-roll dynamics,” JCAP 04 (2024) 050, arXiv:2312.05694 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Loop contributions to the scalar power spectrum due to quartic order action in ultra slow roll inflation,

    S. Maity, H. V. Ragavendra, S. K. Sethi, and L. Sriramkumar, “Loop contributions to the scalar power spectrum due to quartic order action in ultra slow roll inflation,” JCAP 05 (2024) 046, arXiv:2307.13636 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Large — η— approach to single field inflation,

    G. Tasinato, “Large — η— approach to single field inflation,” Phys. Rev. D108 no. 4, (2023) 043526, arXiv:2305.11568 [hep-th]. 14

    2023 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Primordial perturbations from ultra-slow-roll single-field inflation with quantum loop effects,

    S.-L. Cheng, D.-S. Lee, and K.-W. Ng, “Primordial perturbations from ultra-slow-roll single-field inflation with quantum loop effects,” JCAP 03 (2024) 008, arXiv:2305.16810 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  45. [52]

    One-loop power spectrum in ultra slow-roll inflation and implications for primordial black hole dark matter,

    G. Ballesteros and J. G. Egea, “One-loop power spectrum in ultra slow-roll inflation and implications for primordial black hole dark matter,” JCAP 07 (2024) 052, arXiv:2404.07196 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Renormalized one-Loop Corrections in Power Spectrum in USR Inflation,

    H. Sheikhahmadi and A. Nassiri-Rad, “Renormalized one-Loop Corrections in Power Spectrum in USR Inflation,” arXiv:2411.18525 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  47. [54]

    The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out,

    A. Riotto, “The Primordial Black Hole Formation from Single-Field Inflation is Not Ruled Out,” arXiv:2301.00599 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  48. [55]

    Cancellation of quantum corrections on the soft curvature perturbations,

    Y. Tada, T. Terada, and J. Tokuda, “Cancellation of quantum corrections on the soft curvature perturbations,” JHEP 01 (2024) 105, arXiv:2308.04732 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Roles of boundary and equation-of-motion terms in cosmological correlation functions,

    R. Kawaguchi, S. Tsujikawa, and Y. Yamada, “Roles of boundary and equation-of-motion terms in cosmological correlation functions,” Phys. Lett. B856 (2024) 138962, arXiv:2403.16022 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  50. [57]

    Spectrum of third-order tensor perturbations induced by excited scalar fields,

    C.-J. Fang, Z.-Z. Peng, H.-W. Hu, and Z.-K. Guo, “Spectrum of third-order tensor perturbations induced by excited scalar fields,” Phys. Rev. D111 no. 10, (2025) 103508, arXiv:2501.11337 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  51. [58]

    Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics. Part 2. Quartic interactions and consistency relations,

    J. Fumagalli, “Absence of one-loop effects on large scales from small scales in non-slow-roll dynamics. Part 2. Quartic interactions and consistency relations,” JHEP 01 (2025) 108, arXiv:2408.08296 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Proving the absence of large one-loop corrections to the power spectrum of curvature perturbations in transient ultra-slow-roll inflation within the path-integral approach,

    R. Kawaguchi, S. Tsujikawa, and Y. Yamada, “Proving the absence of large one-loop corrections to the power spectrum of curvature perturbations in transient ultra-slow-roll inflation within the path-integral approach,” JHEP 12 (2024) 095, arXiv:2407.19742 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [60]

    Non-Perturbative Hamiltonian and Higher Loop Corrections in USR Inflation,

    H. Firouzjahi and B. Nikbakht, “Non-Perturbative Hamiltonian and Higher Loop Corrections in USR Inflation,” arXiv:2502.09481 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  54. [61]

    Hamiltonians to all Orders in Perturbation Theory and Higher Loop Corrections in Single Field Inflation with PBHs Formation,

    H. Firouzjahi and B. Nikbakht, “Hamiltonians to all Orders in Perturbation Theory and Higher Loop Corrections in Single Field Inflation with PBHs Formation,” arXiv:2502.10287 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  55. [62]

    Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections,

    K. Inomata, “Superhorizon Curvature Perturbations Are Protected against One-Loop Corrections,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133 no. 14, (2024) 141001, arXiv:2403.04682 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Incorporating Backreaction in One-Loop Corrections in Ultra-Slow-Roll Inflation,

    C.-J. Fang, Z.-H. Lyu, C. Chen, and Z.-K. Guo, “Incorporating Backreaction in One-Loop Corrections in Ultra-Slow-Roll Inflation,” arXiv:2502.09555 [gr-qc]. 15

    arXiv

  57. [64]

    Conservation of superhorizon curvature perturbations at one loop: Backreaction in the in-in formalism and renormalization,

    K. Inomata, “Conservation of superhorizon curvature perturbations at one loop: Backreaction in the in-in formalism and renormalization,” Phys. Rev. D111 no. 10, (2025) 103504, arXiv:2502.08707 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  58. [65]

    One-loop renormalization of the effective field theory of inflationary fluctuations from gravitational interactions,

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol, “One-loop renormalization of the effective field theory of inflationary fluctuations from gravitational interactions,” arXiv:2504.07926 [astro-ph.CO]

  59. [66]

    Freezing of the renormalized one-loop primordial scalar power spectrum,

    M. Braglia and L. Pinol, “Freezing of the renormalized one-loop primordial scalar power spectrum,” arXiv:2504.13136 [astro-ph.CO]

  60. [67]

    Symmetry-protected conservation of superhorizon inflationary perturbations to all loops,

    C.-J. Fang, Z.-H. Lyu, C. Chen, and Z.-K. Guo, “Symmetry-protected conservation of superhorizon inflationary perturbations to all loops,” arXiv:2507.00077 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  61. [68]

    Inflationary background renormalization,

    J. Kristiano and J. Yokoyama, “Inflationary background renormalization,” arXiv:2504.18514 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  62. [69]

    Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2,

    BICEP2 Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., “Detection of B-Mode Polarization at Degree Angular Scales by BICEP2,” Phys. Rev. Lett.112 no. 24, (2014) 241101, arXiv:1403.3985 [astro-ph.CO]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,

    BICEP, Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., “Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127 no. 15, (2021) 151301, arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018

  64. [71]

    Signature of gravity waves in polarization of the microwave background,

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, “Signature of gravity waves in polarization of the microwave background,” Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 2054–2057, arXiv:astro-ph/9609169

    1997 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP 05 (2003) 013, arXiv:astro-ph/0210603

    2003 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Quantum non-linear evolution of inflationary tensor perturbations,

    J.-O. Gong and M.-S. Seo, “Quantum non-linear evolution of inflationary tensor perturbations,” JHEP 05 (2019) 021, arXiv:1903.12295 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  67. [75]

    An Infinite Set of Ward Identities for Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology,

    K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui, and J. Khoury, “An Infinite Set of Ward Identities for Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology,” JCAP 01 (2014) 039, arXiv:1304.5527 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Conformal Symmetries of Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology,

    K. Hinterbichler, L. Hui, and J. Khoury, “Conformal Symmetries of Adiabatic Modes in Cosmology,” JCAP 08 (2012) 017, arXiv:1203.6351 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  69. [77]

    On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions,

    V. Assassi, D. Baumann, and D. Green, “On Soft Limits of Inflationary Correlation Functions,” JCAP 11 (2012) 047, arXiv:1204.4207 [hep-th]. 16

    2012 arXiv

  70. [2024]

    103541, arXiv:2303.00341 [hep-th]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.