Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 72 references

Topological Transitions, Pinning and Ratchets for Driven Magnetic Hopfions in Nanostructures

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Driven magnetic hopfions squeezed between nanoscale posts can transform into smaller torons, and an asymmetric defect array turns alternating current into a net dc hopfion motion.

desk verdict New hopfion-disorder phase diagrams and a ratchet, but the topological transition needs a cleaner order parameter. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18827 v1 pith:UXEDB525 submitted 2025-01-31 cond-mat.mes-hall

J. C. Bellizotti Souza , C. J. O. Reichhardt , C. Reichhardt , A. Saxena , N. P. Vizarim , P. A. Venegas This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords magnetichopfionstopologicaltransitiontoronpinninganddepinningratcheteffectatomisticspindynamicschiralmagnetsnanostructureddefectarrays
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses atomistic simulations to establish a phase diagram for current-driven magnetic hopfions in a nanostructured chiral magnet. Depending on drive current, defect spacing, and defect strength, a hopfion can be pinned, can slide between line defects by distorting, or can be compressed into a toron, a dipole-string texture with zero Hopf index, about half the diameter, that moves more slowly and with a finite Hall angle. It also shows that an asymmetric herringbone array of planar defects converts a circular alternating-current drive into a net dc hopfion motion, a ratchet effect for a three-dimensional magnetic texture. This matters because hopfions are candidate information carriers that, unlike skyrmions, do not show a Hall angle in free motion, so these results show how nanostructuring can control and transform them for possible memory or logic applications.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the Hopf index QH, computed with a lattice-based method and the vector-potential gauge of Eqs. (4)-(6), which separates the QH=1 hopfion from the QH=0 toron. The conversion mechanism is geometric compression: when the gap between line defects is narrower than the hopfion, the texture is squeezed as it crosses the posts, and at sufficient compression the knot-like structure unknots into the smaller dipole-string toron. The ratchet mechanism is the asymmetry of the herringbone planar-defect array, which rectifies a circular ac drive into net translation along the easy direction, with one lattice-site step per cycle; no Hall or Magnus force is required for the hopfion itself.

What would settle it

A numerical recomputation of the same trajectories with a different gauge for the vector potential or a finer lattice that finds QH stays at 1 during the passage between the defects would falsify the claimed topological transition; experimentally, time-resolved imaging that resolves the texture at the gap and shows no collapse to the smaller dipole-string toron would likewise refute it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports three dynamical outcomes for a QH=1 hopfion driven by spin-orbit torque through a comb-like array of line defects with raised perpendicular anisotropy. Below a depinning threshold the hopfion is pinned between the posts; above threshold it slides through by distorting; when the defect spacing is smaller than the hopfion's roughly 24 nm diameter or the defect strength exceeds about KD = 1.3J, the hopfion is compressed as it passes between the posts and collapses into a QH=0 dipole-string toron that is about half the diameter, moves more slowly, and has a Hall angle around 43 degrees, whereas the hopfion itself moves with zero Hall angle. Increasing the drive well above the depinning threshold restores the moving hopfion because the distortion induced by the defects is reduced at higher speed. The paper further establishes that under a circular ac drive on an asymmetric herringbone planar-defect array, the hopfion advances by one substrate lattice site per ac cycle along the easy direction, realizing a rocking ratchet for a three-dimensional magnetic texture.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice-based Hopf index computation with the vector-potential gauge of Eqs. (4)-(6) remains accurate while the hopfion is strongly deformed between the line defects, so the measured drop of QH from 1 to 0 is a real topological transition rather than a numerical artifact; the paper itself flags post-transition oscillations in QH as numerical artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Nanostructured constrictions can act as topological switches that convert a QH=1 hopfion into a smaller QH=0 toron, giving a binary state variable based on topology rather than position.
  • A purely alternating current on an asymmetric defect array produces net dc hopfion motion, enabling ac-driven transport without a dc bias.
  • The contrast in Hall angle (zero for the hopfion, about 43 degrees for the toron) provides an unambiguous experimental signature for which texture is moving.
  • Operating at currents well above the depinning threshold avoids the topological transition, so devices can be biased to keep the hopfion intact.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is that higher-Hopf-index hopfions (QH greater than 1) passing through a series of constrictions would shed index stepwise, producing a cascade of toron-like states, which could be tested in the same simulation framework.
  • Once the toron's finite Hall angle is present, a uniaxial ac drive should also produce ratchet transport in the herringbone geometry, since the Hall-like force couples the two directions; the paper only demonstrates the circular-ac case.
  • Because the simulation parameters are mapped to the chiral magnet MnSi, the predicted velocity drop and Hall-angle change could be checked experimentally in patterned films with Lorentz transmission electron microscopy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The authors report atomistic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert simulations of a single magnetic hopfion (QH=1) in a 128 nm × 128 nm × 17 nm chiral magnet with periodic x and y boundaries, interacting with two columnar defects of enhanced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy. By varying defect spacing Δ, defect strength KD, and dc current j, they identify pinned, sliding-hopfion, and QH=0 toron phases, and they show that the hopfion moves without a Hall angle while the toron moves at approximately 43°. They further demonstrate a circular-ac-driven ratchet in a herringbone planar-defect array, with one lattice-site translation per cycle. The phase diagrams and transitions are based on direct LLG integration, with hopfion initialization from an external ansatz (Ref. 48) and Hopf index computed by a lattice method.

Significance. If the central topological-transition claim is correct, this is the first systematic study of pinning, depinning, and topological transformation of driven magnetic hopfions in nanostructured geometries, and the first hopfion ratchet. The absence of fitting to target results, the use of an externally supplied ansatz, and the lattice-based Hopf index computation are strengths. The main risk is that the QH=1 to QH=0 classification rests entirely on one order parameter whose gauge validity is not demonstrated in the strongly deformed, periodic-boundary setting. The quantitative phase boundaries and velocity/Hall-angle values also need full simulation parameters to be reproducible. With those issues addressed, the paper would be a solid contribution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (4)–(6)] The axial gauge A_y=0, A_x=∫_0^y B_z dy', A_z=−∫_0^y B_x dy' is used in a sample that is periodic in y. For a single-valued vector potential on the periodic domain, the integrals of B_z and B_x over one full period must vanish at every x,z; this is not stated or checked. During the strong compression of the hopfion between the line defects (Figs. 4 and 6), the texture approaches the y-periodic boundary, and if the net-flux conditions fail, the discontinuity in A can produce spurious changes in QH. The paper's dismissal of the post-transition QH oscillations in Fig. 6(b) as 'numerical artifacts' without analysis is precisely in the region where QH is the order parameter for the claimed topological transition. Please verify the transition with a gauge-invariant quantity (e.g., preimage linking number) or with an independent lattice gauge, and quantify the numerical noise in QH.
  2. [Sec. 2, Eq. (2)] The Gilbert damping α and the Runge-Kutta time step are not reported. The LLG equation (2) is α-dependent, and depinning currents, velocities, Hall angles, and the reentrant moving-hopfion phase at high current are quantitative predictions. Without α and dt (and any convergence checks), the results are not reproducible. Please add these values and a brief convergence statement.
  3. [Fig. 3] The phase boundaries in Fig. 3 are drawn through the black simulation points, but the assignment criterion is not given and the number of points is limited, especially in Fig. 3(b) and in the narrow reentrant hopfion region at high j. Please state the classification rule (e.g., from the time evolution of Δx and QH) and indicate the uncertainty in the boundary positions, or provide additional points where the boundary is steep.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2] The text uses 'KS ≫ KV' while Eq. (1) defines KS for the top and bottom surfaces and the parameter list gives KT,B=5J; use one notation consistently.
  2. [Sec. 2] The statement that confinement reduces the effective thickness to 16 nm is unexplained; specify the boundary conditions at the top and bottom surfaces.
  3. [Fig. 6(b)] The assertion that the oscillations in QH after the transition are numerical artifacts should be supported by a convergence test or by comparison with an independent gauge; as written it is an unsupported assertion that bears directly on the main claim.
  4. [Sec. 3 and Fig. 7] The ratchet simulation uses f=0.01 GHz, so one ac cycle lasts 100 ns; the 360 ns integration gives only 3.6 cycles. A longer simulation or a statement that the steady-state drift is reached within this time would make the one-site-per-cycle claim more convincing.
  5. [Eq. (1)] The DM energy sign convention and the definition of D_ij along r_ij should be stated once in the methods, since the chirality of the hopfion depends on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the simulation results emerge from LLG integration of an external hopfion ansatz, with no fitted input serving as a predicted output.

full rationale

This paper is an atomistic simulation study rather than a derivation, and I find no load-bearing step in which a claimed result is equivalent by construction to an input or to a self-citation. The hopfion initial condition is generated from the external ansatz of Knapman et al. [48] and then equilibrated by 60 ns of integration without spin-orbit torque. The dynamics are produced by integrating the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation (Eq. 2) with the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1). The pinned, sliding, and toron phases, the velocities, the Hall angles, and the ratchet displacement all emerge from the simulated trajectories; no parameter in the Hamiltonian or in the drive is fitted to reproduce QH, the velocities, the Hall angle, or the phase boundaries. The Hopf index is computed with the lattice-based method of Ref. [48] using the axial gauge of Eqs. (4)-(6); this is an independent diagnostic applied to the simulated spin configuration, not a quantity defined in terms of the desired transition. The paper's own caveat that 'the oscillations in QH that appear after the transition are numerical artifacts' (Fig. 6b) flags a numerical robustness limitation in the order parameter near the transition, and the absence of an independent gauge-invariant check is a correctness risk, but it is not circularity: the claimed QH drop is not imposed by the gauge, by a fit, or by the definition of a phase. Self-citations appear (e.g., Refs. 18, 28, 63), but they are used for general skyrmion pinning and ratchet context and are not the authority for the hopfion-specific topological transition or ratchet effect. There is no uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work, no ansatz smuggled in via self-citation, and no renaming of a known result as organization. The central claims are therefore self-contained simulation outputs, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard micromagnetics plus several domain-specific modeling choices: the MnSi-like parameters, the confinement-based hopfion stability, the lattice Hopf-index method, and the representation of defects as regions of increased PMA. The only unstated quantitative input is the Gilbert damping alpha, which is load-bearing for all reported velocities and Hall angles. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Gilbert damping alpha = not stated
    Alpha appears in the LLG equation (Eq. 2) and controls the relaxation and the terminal velocities; its value is never stated, yet the reported velocities and Hall angles depend on it. Without alpha, the quantitative results cannot be reproduced.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math The Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with an adiabatic spin-orbit torque term (Eq. 2) accurately captures current-driven dynamics of magnetic moments at T=0.
    Used throughout as the time evolution model; relies on standard micromagnetics.
  • domain assumption The material parameters J=1 meV, D=0.2J, KV=0.01J, and KS=5J are representative of a MnSi-like chiral magnet.
    Stated in Methods; these parameters are taken from prior literature (Refs 13, 58, 59) and are not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption A hopfion can be stabilized in the confined 17 nm film with KS >> KV, and the confinement reduces the effective thickness to 16 nm.
    Stated in Methods; hopfion stability relies on confinement (Ref 59), and the effective thickness is asserted without a detailed derivation.
  • domain assumption The lattice-based Hopf index computation with the vector potential gauge in Eqs. (4)-(6) gives reliable QH values during the dynamics.
    Adopted from Ref 48; the paper acknowledges numerical oscillations in QH after the transition (Fig. 6b), so the reliability of QH as an order parameter is an assumption.
  • domain assumption Zero temperature and periodic boundary conditions in x and y with open surfaces in z represent a thin-film device.
    The simulations are run at T=0 K with PBC in x,y; the effects of finite temperature and sample edges on the phase diagram are not addressed.
  • domain assumption Line defects can be represented by a locally increased perpendicular anisotropy KD.
    The defects are implemented as columns with higher PMA; the Discussion argues such defects could be made by irradiation or etching, but no experimental validation is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Transitions, Pinning and Ratchets for Driven Magnetic Hopfions in Nanostructures." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UXEDB525

@misc{pith2026250118827,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Transitions, Pinning and Ratchets for Driven Magnetic Hopfions in Nanostructures},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UXEDB525}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18827}
}
read the original abstract

Using atomistic simulations, we examine the dynamics of three-dimensional magnetic hopfions interacting with an array of line defects or posts as a function of defect spacing, defect strength, and current. We find a pinned phase, a sliding phase where a hopfion can move through the posts or hurdles by distorting, and a regime where the hopfion becomes compressed and transforms into a toron that is half the size of the hopfion and moves at a lower velocity. The toron states occur when the defects are strong; however, in the toron regime, it is possible to stabilize sliding hopfions by increasing the applied current. Hopfions move without a Hall angle, while the toron moves with a finite Hall angle. We also show that when a hopfion interacts with an asymmetric array of planar defects, a ratchet effect consisting of a net dc motion can be realized under purely ac driving.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18827 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) 3D view of our system for a QH = 1 hopfion, which is plotted by visualizing the mz = 0 isosurface. The colors represent the m direction given by the angle between mx and my, as shown in the colorbar. We place two column-like defects (thick black lines) with an increased PMA of KD, where ∆ is the distance between the two columns. The hopfion is subjected to dc driving along yˆ produced by a current j. This moves … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A dipole string texture or a toron with QH = 0. The colors represent the m direction given by the angle between mx and my, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phase diagrams for a hopfion interacting with a line defect structure as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Images of a hopfion topologically transitioning from QH = 1 to QH = 0 upon interacting with the columnar defects. The colors represent the m direction given by the angle between mx and my, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Images of freely moving textures away from the influence of the defect lines in the system from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Displacements ∆x (black) and ∆y (red) versus time for the system from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Image of the trajectory of a hopfion, colored according to the progression of the circular ac driving period, moving through a herringbone planar defect array pattern (grey lines) in a sample with KD = 0.5J. (b) The hopfion velocity vx (black) and vy (red) vs time …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919, DOI: 10.1126/science.1166767 (2009)

    doi:10.1126/science.1166767 2009

  2. [2]

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Skyrmion flow near room temperature in an ultralow current density. Nat. Commun. 3, 988, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1990 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms1990 2012

  3. [3]

    & Tokura, Y

    Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y . Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions.Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911, DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2013.243 (2013)

    doi:10.1038/nnano.2013.243 2013

  4. [4]

    Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater .15, 501–506, DOI: 10.1038/NMAT4593 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat4593 2016

  5. [5]

    Everschor-Sitte, K., Masell, J., Reeve, R. M. & Klaüi, M. Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions - Overview of recent progress in an active research field. J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901, DOI: 10.1063/1.5048972 (2018)

    doi:10.1063/1.5048972 2018

  6. [6]

    Nayak, A. K. et al. Magnetic antiskyrmions above room temperature in tetragonal Heusler materials. Nat. (London) 548, 561–566, DOI: 10.1038/nature23466 (2017)

    doi:10.1038/nature23466 2017

  7. [7]

    G., Stebliy, M

    Kolesnikov, A. G., Stebliy, M. E., Samardak, A. S. & Ognev, A. V . Skyrmionium – high velocity without the skyrmion Hall effect. Sci. Rep. 8, 16966, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34934-2 (2018)

    doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34934-2 2018

  8. [8]

    Jani, H. et al. Antiferromagnetic half-skyrmions and bimerons at room temperature. Nat. (London) 590, 74, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03219-6 (2021)

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03219-6 2021

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nat. (London) 564, 95–98, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0745-3 (2018)

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Biskyrmion states and their current-driven motion in a layered manganite. Nat. Commun. 5, 3198, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4198 (2014)

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    & Tretiakov, O

    Göbel, B., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles. Phys. Rep. 895, 1, DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.001 (2021)

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    Jonietz, F. et al. Spin transfer torques in MnSi at ultralow current densities. Science 330, 1648–1651, DOI: 10.1126/ science.1195709 (2010)

    2010

  5. [13]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Current-induced skyrmion dynamics in constricted geometries.Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 742–747, DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2013.176 (2013)

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    Legrand, W. et al. Room-temperature current-induced generation and motion of sub-100 nm skyrmions. Nano Lett. 17, 2703–2712, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b00649 (2017)

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    Mochizuki, M. et al. Thermally driven ratchet motion of a skyrmion microcrystal and topological magnon Hall effect. Nat. Mater .13, 241–246, DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3862 (2014)

    2014 doi

  8. [16]

    Wang, Z. et al. Thermal generation, manipulation and thermoelectric detection of skyrmions. Nat. Electron. 3, 672, DOI: 10.1038/s41928-020-00489-2 (2020). 9/12

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    Juge, R. et al. Helium ions put magnetic skyrmions on the track. Nano Lett. 21, 2989–2996, DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett. 1c00136 (2021)

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Reichhardt, C., Reichhardt, C. J. O. & Milosevic, M. Statics and dynamics of skyrmions interacting with disorder and nanostructures. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035005, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.94.035005 (2022)

    2022 doi

  11. [19]

    & Cros, V

    Fert, A., Reyren, N. & Cros, V . Magnetic skyrmions: advances in physics and potential applications.Nat. Rev. Mater .2, 17031, DOI: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.31 (2017)

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    & Kläui, M

    Finocchio, G., Büttner, F., Tomasello, R., Carpentieri, M. & Kläui, M. Magnetic skyrmions: from fundamental to applications. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 423001, DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/42/423001 (2016)

    2016 doi

  13. [21]

    Vakili, H. et al. Skyrmionics - computing and memory technologies based on topological excitations in magnets. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 070908, DOI: 10.1063/5.0046950 (2021)

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    & Everschor-Sitte, K

    Pinna, D., Bourianoff, G. & Everschor-Sitte, K. Reservoir computing with random skyrmion textures. Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 054020, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.054020 (2020)

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Song, K. M. et al. Skyrmion-based artificial synapses for neuromorphic computing. Nat. Electron. 3, 148–155, DOI: 10.1038/s41928-020-0385-0 (2020)

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Lin, S.-Z., Reichhardt, C., Batista, C. D. & Saxena, A. Particle model for skyrmions in metallic chiral magnets: Dynamics, pinning, and creep. Phys. Rev. B 87, 214419, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.214419 (2013)

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    & Reichhardt, C

    Reichhardt, C., Ray, D. & Reichhardt, C. J. O. Collective transport properties of driven skyrmions with random disorder. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 217202, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.217202 (2015)

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Huang, P. et al. Melting of a skyrmion lattice to a skyrmion liquid via a hexatic phase. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 761, DOI: 10.1038/s41565-020-0716-3 (2020)

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    & Mertig, I

    Göbel, B. & Mertig, I. Skyrmion ratchet propagation: utilizing the skyrmion Hall effect in AC racetrack storage devices. Sci. Rep. 11, 3020, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81992-0 (2021)

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Souza, J. C. B., Vizarim, N. P., Reichhardt, C. J. O., Reichhardt, C. & Venegas, P. A. Skyrmion ratchet in funnel geometries. Phys. Rev. B 104, 054434, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.054434 (2021)

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Jiang, W. et al. Direct observation of the skyrmion Hall effect. Nat. Phys. 13, 162–169, DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS3883 (2017)

    2017 doi

  22. [30]

    Litzius, K. et al. Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by direct time-resolved X-ray microscopy. Nat. Phys. 13, 170–175, DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS4000 (2017)

    2017 doi

  23. [31]

    Zeissler, K. et al. Diameter-independent skyrmion Hall angle observed in chiral magnetic multilayers. Nat. Commun. 11, 428, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-14232-9 (2020)

    2020 doi

  24. [32]

    Faddeev, L. D. Some comments on the many-dimensional solitons. Lett. Math. Phys. 1, 289–293, DOI: 10.1007/ BF00398483 (1976)

    1976

  25. [33]

    & Niemi, A

    Faddeev, L. & Niemi, A. J. Stable knot-like structures in classical field theory. Nat. (London) 387, 58, DOI: 10.1038/ 387058a0 (1997)

    1997

  26. [34]

    Über die Abbildungen der dreidimensionalen Sphäre auf die Kugelfläche

    Hopf, H. Über die Abbildungen der dreidimensionalen Sphäre auf die Kugelfläche. Math. Annal. 104, 637–665, DOI: 10.1007/BF01457962 (1931)

    1931 doi

  27. [35]

    Whitehead, J. H. C. An expression of Hopf’s invariant as an integral. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 33, 117–123, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.33.5.117 (1947)

    1947 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Boyle, T

    Ackerman, P. J., Boyle, T. & Smalyukh, I. I. Squirming motion of baby skyrmions in nematic fluids. Nat. Commun. 8, 673, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00659-5 (2017)

    2017 doi

  29. [37]

    Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Diversity of knot solitons in liquid crystals manifested by linking of preimages in torons and hopfions. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011006, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.7.011006 (2017)

    2017 doi

  30. [38]

    B., Ackerman, P

    Tai, J.-S. B., Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Topological transformations of Hopf solitons in chiral ferromagnets and liquid crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 921–926, DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716887115 (2018)

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    & Vinokur, V

    Luk’yanchuk, I., Tikhonov, Y ., Razumnaya, A. & Vinokur, V . M. Hopfions emerge in ferroelectrics.Nat. Commun. 11, 2433, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16258-w (2020)

    2020 doi

  32. [40]

    Hopfions in chiral magnets

    Sutcliffe, P. Hopfions in chiral magnets. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 51, 375401, DOI: 10.1088/1751-8121/aad521 (2018)

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Static Hopf solitons and knotted emergent fields in solid-state noncentrosymmetric magnetic nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 187201, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.187201 (2018). 10/12

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    Liu, Y ., Lake, R. K. & Zang, J. Binding a hopfion in a chiral magnet nanodisk. Phys. Rev. B 98, 174437, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.174437 (2018)

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    Kent, N. et al. Creation and observation of Hopfions in magnetic multilayer systems. Nat. Commun. 12, 1562, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21846-5 (2021)

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Liu, Y ., Watanabe, H. & Nagaosa, N. Emergent magnetomultipoles and nonlinear responses of a magnetic hopfion.Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 267201, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.267201 (2022)

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Rybakov, F. N.et al. Magnetic hopfions in solids. APL Mater .10, 111113, DOI: 10.1063/5.0099942 (2022)

    2022 doi

  38. [46]

    Yu, X. et al. Realization and current-driven dynamics of fractional hopfions and their ensembles in a helimagnet FeGe. Adv. Mater .35, 2210646, DOI: 10.1002/adma.202210646 (2023)

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    Magnetic hopfions: A review

    Guslienko, K. Magnetic hopfions: A review. Magnetism 4, 383–399, DOI: 10.3390/magnetism4040025 (2024)

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Knapman, R., Tausendpfund, T., Díaz, S. A. & Everschor-Sitte, K. Spacetime magnetic hopfions from internal excitations and braiding of skyrmions. Commun. Phys. 7, 1–9, DOI: 10.1038/s42005-024-01628-3 (2024)

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    C., Knapman, R., Pignedoli, A

    Azhar, M., Shaju, S. C., Knapman, R., Pignedoli, A. & Everschor-Sitte, K. 3D magnetic textures with mixed topology: Unlocking the tunable Hopf index. arXiv:2411.06929 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.06929 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    Zheng, F. et al. Hopfion rings in a cubic chiral magnet. Nat. (London) 623, 718–723, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06658-5 (2023)

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    Wang, L. et al. Construction of a room-temperature Pt/Co/Ta multilayer film with ultrahigh-density skyrmions for memory application. ACS Appl. Mater . Interf.11, 12098–12104, DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b00155 (2019)

    2019 doi

  44. [52]

    & Zang, J

    Liu, Y ., Hou, W., Han, X. & Zang, J. Three-dimensional dynamics of a magnetic hopfion driven by spin transfer torque. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 127204, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.127204 (2020)

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    & Fischer, P

    Raftrey, D. & Fischer, P. Field-driven dynamics of magnetic hopfions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 257201, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.127.257201 (2021)

    2021

  46. [54]

    P., Rybakov, F

    Müller, G. P., Rybakov, F. N., Jónsson, H., Blügel, S. & Kiselev, N. S. Coupled quasimonopoles in chiral magnets.Phys. Rev. B 101, 184405, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.184405 (2020)

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    & Motome, Y

    Shimizu, K., Okumura, S., Kato, Y . & Motome, Y . Current-induced motion of nanoscale magnetic torons over the wide range of the Hall angle. arXiv:2407.02983 DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.02983 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    Amaral, G. N. C. et al. Liquid crystal torons in Poiseuille-like flows.Sci. Rep. 15, 2684, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83294-7 (2025)

    2025 doi

  49. [57]

    Evans, R. F. L. Atomistic Spin Dynamics. In Andreoni, W. & Yip, S. (eds.)Handbook of Materials Modeling: Applications: Current and Emerging Materials , 1–23, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50257-1_147-1 (Springer International Publishing, 2018)

    doi

  50. [58]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets. Nat. Commun. 4, 1463, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2442 (2013)

    2013 doi

  51. [59]

    S., Qaiumzadeh, A

    Wang, X. S., Qaiumzadeh, A. & Brataas, A. Current-driven dynamics of magnetic hopfions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 147203, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.147203 (2019)

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    & Mochizuki, M

    Seki, S. & Mochizuki, M. Skyrmions in Magnetic Materials (Springer International Publishing, 2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Gilbert, T. L. A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials. IEEE Trans. Mag. 40, 3443–3449, DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 (2004)

    2004

  54. [62]

    & Kovalev, A

    Li, B. & Kovalev, A. A. Magnon Landau levels and spin responses in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 257201, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.257201 (2020)

    2020 doi

  55. [63]

    & Reichhardt, C

    Reichhardt, C. & Reichhardt, C. J. O. Depinning and nonequilibrium dynamic phases of particle assemblies driven over random and ordered substrates: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 026501, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/80/2/026501 (2017)

    2017 doi

  56. [64]

    & Nagaosa, N

    Koshibae, W. & Nagaosa, N. Dynamics of skyrmion in disordered chiral magnet of thin film form. Sci. Rep. 9, 5111, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41441-5 (2019)

    2019 doi

  57. [65]

    & Barabási, A.-L

    Lee, C.-S., Jankó, B., Derényi, I. & Barabási, A.-L. Reducing vortex density in superconductors using the ‘ratchet effect’. Nat. (London) 400, 337–340, DOI: 10.1038/22485 (1999)

    1999 doi

  58. [66]

    E., Gonzalez, E

    Villegas, J. E., Gonzalez, E. M., Sefrioui, Z., Santamaria, J. & Vicent, J. L. V ortex phases in superconducting nb thin films with periodic pinning. Phys. Rev. B 72, 174512, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.174512 (2005). 11/12

    2005 doi

  59. [67]

    C., Van de V ondel, J., Zhu, B

    de Souza Silva, C. C., Van de V ondel, J., Zhu, B. Y ., Morelle, M. & Moshchalkov, V . V . V ortex ratchet effects in films with a periodic array of antidots. Phys. Rev. B 73, 014507, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.014507 (2006)

    2006 doi

  60. [68]

    Yu, K. et al. Asymmetric weak-pinning superconducting channels: V ortex ratchets. Phys. Rev. B 76, 220507, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.220507 (2007)

    2007 doi

  61. [69]

    Luo, M.-B. & Hu, X. Depinning and creep motion in glass states of flux lines. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 267002, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.267002 (2007)

    2007 doi

  62. [70]

    Perez de Lara, D. et al. V ortex ratchet reversal: Role of interstitial vortices. Phys. Rev. B 83, 174507, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.83.174507 (2011)

    2011

  63. [71]

    & Reichhardt, C

    Reichhardt, C., Ray, D. & Reichhardt, C. J. O. Quantized transport for a skyrmion moving on a two-dimensional periodic substrate. Phys. Rev. B 91, 104426, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.104426 (2015)

    2015 doi

  64. [72]

    See supplemental material for animations showing the motion of the textures. 12/12

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.