REVIEW 3 cited by
Comparison of cosmic string and superstring models to NANOGrav 12.5-year results
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We compare the spectrum of the stochastic gravitational wave background produced in several models of cosmic strings with the common-spectrum process recently reported by NANOGrav. We discuss theoretical uncertainties in computing such a background, and show that despite such uncertainties, cosmic strings remain a good explanation for the potential signal, but the consequences for cosmic string parameters depend on the model. Superstrings could also explain the signal, but only in a restricted parameter space where their network behavior is effectively identical to that of ordinary cosmic strings.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Cosmic superstrings in large volume compactifications: PTAs, LISA and time-varying tension
Cosmic superstrings with a time-varying tension in large-volume string compactifications generically predict a LISA-band spectral drop and a high-frequency f^4 boost, encoding the mass and decay of the volume modulus.
-
Detection of cosmic strings by gravitational wave lensing. Predictions for Einstein Telescope
Simulated cosmic-string lensing of binary black holes predicts Einstein Telescope would detect the events and infer Gµ ≈ 1e-10, though the source geometry is assumed ad hoc.
-
Searching beyond the fiducial stochastic gravitational wave background in pulsar timing array data using likelihood reweighting
A two-stage likelihood reweighting method recovers the parameters and Bayes factor of an added sinusoid signal in simulated pulsar timing data, matching full Bayesian analyses while claiming about a tenfold speedup.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.