Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Measurement-induced phase transitions in monitored infinite-range interacting systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05394 v1 pith:V5ZB2UTQ submitted 2024-10-07 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech

Measurement-induced phase transitions in monitored infinite-range interacting systems

classification quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords monitoredinfinite-rangemodelsphasepost-selectionsystemstransitionsbarrier
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key challenge in observing measurement-induced phase transitions is the mitigation of the post-selection barrier, which causes the reproducibility of specific sequences of measurement readouts--the trajectory--to be exponentially small in system size. Recent studies suggest that some classes of monitored infinite-range systems alleviate this problem by exhibiting a fast saturation of entanglement, resulting in only a polynomial post-selection overhead. This paper answers whether this feature is inherent in infinite-range systems, due to their underlying semiclassical dynamics. We consider three experimentally relevant monitored models: a Tavis-Cummings model, a Superradiance model, and a Bose-Hubbard dimer, each exhibiting non-trivial monitored dynamics. We unveil the occurrence of entanglement phase transitions in these models, showing how the saturation time is strongly affected by bistability regions, which also prevent the mitigation of the post-selection barrier. Finally, we propose experimental realizations of these models, providing a discussion of post selection from an experimental perspective.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Controlling Waiting Time Statistics in Monitored Collective Spins: Mitigating Detector's Resolution Barrier in Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Rotating two collective spin subsystems by angle heta lengthens quantum-jump waiting times (finite and N-independent at heta= heta=π), mitigating detector resolution at the cost of longer entanglement saturation times.

  2. Controlling Waiting Time Statistics in Monitored Collective Spins: Mitigating Detector's Resolution Barrier in Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions

    quant-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Partitioning monitored collective spins into subsystems rotated by θ increases jump waiting times by orders of magnitude, fully resolving detector resolution at θ=π while lengthening entanglement saturation.