REVIEW 2 cited by
PRKAN: Parameter-Reduced Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) represent an innovation in neural network architectures, offering a compelling alternative to Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) in models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and Transformers. By advancing network design, KANs drive groundbreaking research and enable transformative applications across various scientific domains involving neural networks. However, existing KANs often require significantly more parameters in their network layers than MLPs. To address this limitation, this paper introduces PRKANs (Parameter-Reduced Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks), which employ several methods to reduce the parameter count in KAN layers, making them comparable to MLP layers. Experimental results on the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST datasets demonstrate that PRKANs outperform several existing KANs, and their variant with attention mechanisms rivals the performance of MLPs, albeit with slightly longer training times. Furthermore, the study highlights the advantages of Gaussian Radial Basis Functions (GRBFs) and layer normalization in KAN designs. The repository for this work is available at: https://github.com/hoangthangta/All-KAN.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SechKAN: Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks with Hyperbolic Secant Functions
SechKAN combines sech basis functions with a 1D linear projection to build a KAN-style model whose parameter count matches MLPs and which is competitive or better than several KAN variants on tested benchmarks.
-
Kolmogorov Arnold Networks (KANs) for Imbalanced Data -- An Empirical Perspective
On ten KEEL datasets, KANs outperform MLPs on raw imbalanced data but resampling and focal loss degrade KANs while MLPs with those techniques match KAN performance at far lower cost.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.