Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calculating Bayesian evidence for inflationary models using CONNECT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.03968 v2 pith:VCZ5NNYB submitted 2024-06-06 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMgr-qchep-phhep-th

Calculating Bayesian evidence for inflationary models using CONNECT

classification astro-ph.CO astro-ph.IMgr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords evidencebayesianmodelmodelsparameterscalculationcomputationconnect
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Bayesian evidence is a standard tool used for comparing the ability of different models to fit available data and is used extensively in cosmology. However, since the evidence calculation involves performing an integral of the likelihood function over the entire space of model parameters this can be prohibitively expensive in terms of both CPU and time consumption. For example, in the simplest $\Lambda$CDM model and using CMB data from the Planck satellite, the dimensionality of the model space is over 30 (typically 6 cosmological parameters and 28 nuisance parameters). Even the simplest possible model requires $\mathcal{O}(10^6)$ calls to an Einstein--Boltzmann solver such as CLASS or CAMB and takes several days. Here we present calculations of Bayesian evidence using the CONNECT framework to calculate cosmological observables. We demonstrate that we can achieve results comparable to those obtained using Einstein--Boltzmann solvers, but at a minute fraction of the computational cost. As a test case, we then go on to compute Bayesian evidence ratios for a selection of slow-roll inflationary models. In the setup presented here, the total computation time is completely dominated by the likelihood function calculation which now becomes the main bottleneck for increasing computation speed.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bayesian analysis of $\alpha$-Starobinsky model with Planck, ACT and DESI data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0

    With Planck+ACT+DESI, pure Starobinsky requires N*>60 while free α shows a 1σ preference for log10 α>0; ACT lensing adds little to the primordial constraints.