Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Playground of Lognormal Seminumerical Simulations of~the~Lyman~$\alpha$ Forest: Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Fast lognormal simulations of the Lyman-alpha forest can recover the intergalactic medium's temperature, density slope, and Jeans length from observed spectra at z=3-5, and can be extended to cosmological parameter inference.

desk verdict A useful but overclaimed application of the authors' lognormal Lyα simulator: the paper cannot support 'effectively recover' without an injection-recovery test. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11909 v2 pith:VFEN2TNH submitted 2024-12-16 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords Lyman-alphaforestlognormalseminumericalsimulationsintergalacticmediumthermalhistoryfluxpowerspectrumMarkovChainMonteCarloJeanslengthquasarabsorptionspectra
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a fast, approximate way of generating synthetic quasar absorption spectra—the lognormal seminumerical simulation—can recover the thermal state of the intergalactic medium from Lyman-alpha forest data. Synthetic one-dimensional flux power spectra at redshifts 3 to 5 are fitted to observed spectra with a Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler, and the fits are claimed to return the temperature at mean density, the slope of the temperature-density relation, and the Jeans length. The paper further claims that the same synthetic spectra match large-scale survey measurements well enough to support cosmological parameter inference. If these claims hold, the practical payoff is large: surveys with hundreds of thousands of quasar spectra need mock datasets that are far cheaper to produce than full hydrodynamic simulations.

What carries the argument

The central object is the lognormal baryon density field. The linear baryonic density contrast $\delta_B$ is generated from the dark-matter power spectrum with a Gaussian Jeans filter, $\exp(-2 x_J^2 k^2)$, and the baryon number density is written as $n_B = A \exp(\delta_B)$, turning a Gaussian field into a non-Gaussian density field. A temperature-density relation $T = T_0 (n_B/n_0)^{\gamma-1}$, photoionization equilibrium, and Voigt-profile line transfer convert that field into transmitted flux, and the 1D flux power spectrum is compared with observations through a Gaussian likelihood in the Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampler. The Jeans length $x_J$ is both a fitted parameter and the smoothing scale built into the density field, which is why it carries much of the argument.

What would settle it

Generate mock Lyman-alpha spectra from a full smoothed-particle hydrodynamical simulation with known thermal parameters and run the same Markov Chain Monte Carlo pipeline on them: the central claim survives only if the posterior intervals for T0, gamma, and xJ contain the true values. The paper's own comparison with smoothed-particle hydrodynamical simulations already suggests xJ would come out too low, which would falsify the recovery claim for that parameter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the lognormal seminumerical simulator—despite replacing the full gas physics with a lognormal transform and a single constant Jeans length—produces flux power spectra whose Markov Chain Monte Carlo fits to observed Lyman-alpha data return credible values for T0, gamma, and xJ at each redshift from 3 to 5. The best-fit spectra are consistent with the high-redshift observed power spectrum and with large-scale survey measurements at most redshifts, which the authors read as evidence that the approach can also be used for cosmological parameter inference. The paper also reports that the recovered temperature evolution agrees with a standard ultraviolet-background model, while noting explicitly that comparison with smoothed-particle hydrodynamical simulations shows the lognormal model cannot recover all true parameters simultaneously and that the Jeans length tends to be underestimated.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the baryon density can be represented by a lognormal transform of the linear density field with one fixed smoothing scale (the Jeans length); if real gas smoothing varies with density, the simulated power spectra will be biased and so will the fitted temperatures.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Thermal parameter space at z=3-5 can be explored quickly: the lognormal simulator generates synthetic spectra at a small fraction of the cost of hydrodynamic runs, so Markov Chain Monte Carlo chains over T0, gamma, and xJ become practical.
  • The same synthetic power spectra match large-scale survey measurements well enough that the pipeline can be pointed at cosmological parameter inference, not just thermal parameters.
  • The simulator can produce the large numbers of mock quasar spectra needed to interpret high-quality data from current and future QSO absorption surveys.
  • The recovered temperature evolution is consistent with the high-redshift observations and with a standard ultraviolet-background model, giving a cross-check on the thermal history of the intergalactic medium.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: The paper stops at feasibility; a natural next step would be a joint fit that varies cosmological parameters alongside T0, gamma, and xJ in one Markov Chain Monte Carlo run, using the lognormal simulator as the likelihood engine.
  • Editorial: The constant-Jeans-length assumption is the first suspect for the reported xJ underestimate; replacing the fixed Gaussian smoothing with a density-dependent Jeans length in the density-field construction is a direct, testable modification.
  • Editorial: Because the model systematically underpredicts power at small scales relative to one observational dataset, the recovery claim may be scale-dependent; generating spectra with finer resolution or smaller-scale coverage would test whether the bias persists.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper applies a lognormal seminumerical model of the Lyman-alpha forest, previously developed in Refs. [15-17], to generate mock quasar absorption spectra at redshifts 3 <= z <= 5. The synthetic 1D flux power spectra are fitted to observational measurements from XQ-100 [27] and Boera et al. [18] using an MCMC sampler, with the goal of recovering the thermal parameters T0, gamma, and the Jeans length xJ. The best-fit temperature evolution is compared with ultraviolet background models, and the large-scale synthetic power spectrum is compared with eBOSS measurements. The main claims in the abstract and Section 6 are that the lognormal simulations can effectively recover thermal parameters and Jeans length and that the approach can also be used for cosmological parameter inference.

Significance. If the recovery claim were properly validated, the paper would offer a computationally cheap tool for generating large synthetic Lyman-alpha forest samples, which is timely for current and upcoming surveys. The paper is transparent about its algorithms, presents detailed pseudocode, and compares against multiple observational datasets. However, the central claim is currently not supported by a direct validation against known true parameters, and the paper itself acknowledges a known limitation of the lognormal model in recovering all parameters. The cosmological-inference claim also goes beyond what is actually demonstrated. The manuscript is a useful proof-of-concept but requires substantial additional testing before the main claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.1 and Abstract/Conclusions] The central claim that lognormal simulations 'can effectively recover thermal parameters and Jeans length' is not validated against any known ground truth. The MCMC fits are compared only with observed 1D flux power spectra, and agreement with observed data does not by itself demonstrate unbiased recovery, because a biased forward model can still be tuned to match the data. This concern is concrete rather than hypothetical: Section 5.1 states that comparisons with SPH simulations show 'the lognormal model cannot simultaneously recover the true value of all parameters,' and Fig. 7 indicates a tendency to underestimate xJ. I request an explicit injection-recovery test, ideally using a hydrodynamic simulation with known thermal state, reporting biases and coverage for T0, gamma, and xJ. Until such a test is shown, the abstract's 'effectively recover' should be removed or substantially qualified.
  2. [Section 6, conclusion 2 and Fig. 6] The claim that the approach 'can be also used for the cosmological parameter inference' is not supported by any cosmological parameter inference. The only evidence presented is qualitative agreement between the synthetic FPS and eBOSS measurements on large scales, and the text itself notes discrepancies at z = 3.2, 3.8, and 4.0. Either perform an actual likelihood-based inference or forecast over cosmological parameters using mock data, or limit the conclusion to a statement about large-scale consistency of the FPS.
  3. [Section 5.1 and 5.2] The systematic residuals at k > 0.04 relative to XQ-100 are acknowledged but attributed to lack of small-scale data coverage; however, Fig. 4 shows that the FPS is most sensitive to T0 and gamma precisely at k > 0.03-0.1. Since the MCMC analysis uses only 30 lines of sight (Section 5.2), the reported parameter uncertainties and the T0 evolution in Table 1 may be dominated by large-scale sample variance and model discrepancy rather than by the thermal signal. The paper should show how the fits and posteriors change when the small-scale data are included or excluded, and should propagate the 30-LOS noise into the parameter errors, for example through mock realizations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2.6)] The denominator in Eq. (2.6) is written as the integral over (dk/k') P_B(k',z); this should presumably be (dk'/k') P_B(k',z), since k' is the integration variable and k is the lower limit.
  2. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption describes the bottom panel as a '4D' parameter estimate, but the paper's main analysis uses only three free parameters {T0, gamma, xJ}; please clarify whether the 4D case includes Gamma_HI and why it appears only as a preliminary result.
  3. [Table 1 and Fig. 6] Table 1 does not state the number of lines of sight used, while Fig. 6 shows curves for both NLOS = 30 and NLOS = 1000; specify which configuration the quoted parameter values correspond to.
  4. [Reference [36]] Reference [36] (Haardt & Madau 2012) is given the arXiv identifier 2406.15237, which appears to be a 2024 preprint rather than the 2012 paper; please correct the identifier.
  5. [Throughout] There are several grammatical slips, e.g., 'we assuming' in Section 2 and 'the models has less power' in Section 5.1; these should be corrected in a language edit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No construction-level circularity: the forward model is simulated, fitted to external FPS data, and checked against separate eBOSS measurements; the 'effective recovery' claim is under-validated but not circular.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Equations (2.1)-(2.20) define a seminumerical forward model with parameters T0, gamma, and xJ; synthetic spectra are generated from random Gaussian seeds and the resulting 1D flux power spectrum is compared via MCMC (Eq. 4.1) to external observational FPS from Boera et al. (2019) and Irsic et al. (2017), with eBOSS measurements held out as an additional comparison. No fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction; the parameter values in Table 1 are posterior inferences, not predictions statistically forced by a fitted subset. The self-citations [16] and [17] describe the construction of the lognormal model and do not supply a uniqueness or equivalence argument; the paper explicitly quotes [17] for the negative result that the full four-parameter model cannot recover all true parameters (Sec. 5.1), which is external evidence against, not in favor of, the method. The load-bearing limitation is that the paper claims 'effectively recover' without an injection-recovery test: Section 5.1 admits the lognormal model cannot simultaneously recover true parameters and that xJ is underestimated (Fig. 7). This is a correctness/validity risk, not circularity: the MCMC fit is not forced by construction to return inputs, and comparisons to external data are a standard (if weak) validation path. The cosmological-inference claim uses eBOSS data not included in the likelihood, so it is not a self-consistency artifact. Overall circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the lognormal density field approximation (Eq. 2.10), the constant Jeans length smoothing (Eq. 2.1), photoionization equilibrium, and the fixed Planck cosmology. The three thermal parameters T0, gamma, and xJ are fitted free parameters at every redshift, so the 'recovery' is a fit, not a prediction. The paper introduces no new entities; its code teco is a standard temperature evolution integrator.

free parameters (3)
  • T0(z) temperature at mean density, per redshift bin = 0.8 to 1.8 x 10^4 K across z=3-5 (Table 1)
    One of the three MCMC target parameters; directly fitted to observed flux power spectra in each of the 9 redshift bins.
  • gamma(z) temperature-density slope = 1.15 to 1.53 (Table 1)
    Second MCMC parameter; fitted to the same observed power spectra.
  • xJ(z) Jeans length = 0.047 to 0.129 Mpc (Table 1)
    Third MCMC parameter; the paper notes it tends to be underestimated (Fig 7).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Baryonic density field is a lognormal transform of the linear density contrast (Eq. 2.10).
    Inherited from lognormal Lyman-alpha models [10,13-17]; central to generating synthetic spectra.
  • domain assumption Photoionization equilibrium with an optically thin gas, with recombination coefficient from [25] (Eqs. 2.14-2.17).
    Converts hydrogen number density to neutral fraction without radiative transfer.
  • domain assumption Power-law temperature-density relation T = T0 (nb/n0)^(gamma-1) (Eq. 2.18).
    Standard description of IGM thermal state; the parameters gamma and T0 are the targets.
  • domain assumption Constant Jeans length smoothing of the baryonic power spectrum (Eq. 2.1).
    Authors explicitly flag this as a simplification: 'the Jeans length depends on temperature and density, and therefore should be adaptive.'
  • domain assumption Ignore adiabatic heating and cooling from structure formation in teco (Eq. B.1).
    Cites [40] that it has weak effect at mean density; still an unverified assumption in this code.
  • domain assumption Fiducial Planck 2013 cosmology fixed throughout (Section 1).
    Cosmological parameters are not varied, so any mismatch in geometry or growth can bias recovered thermal parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Playground of Lognormal Seminumerical Simulations of~the~Lyman~$\alpha$ Forest: Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VFEN2TNH

@misc{pith2026241211909,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Playground of Lognormal Seminumerical Simulations of~the~Lyman~$\alpha$ Forest: Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VFEN2TNH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11909}
}
abstract

This study aims to test a potential application of lognormal seminumerical simulations to recover the thermal parameters and Jeans length. This could be suitable for generating large number of synthetic spectra with various input data and parameters, and thus ideal for interpreting the high-quality data obtained from QSO absorption spectra surveys. We use a seminumerical approach to simulate absorption spectra of quasars at redshifts $ 3 \leq z \leq 5$. These synthetic spectra are compared with the 1D flux power spectra and using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis method we determine the temperature at mean density, slope of the temperature-density relation and Jeans length. Our best-fit model is also compared with the evolution of the temperature of the intergalactic medium from various UVB models. We show that the lognormal simulations can effectively recover thermal parameters and Jeans length. Besides, by comparing the synthetic flux power spectra with observations from Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopy Survey we found, that such an approach can be also used for the cosmological parameter inference.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, T.A.M. Berg, V. D’Odorico, M.G. Haehnelt, S. Cristiani et al.,The Lyman α forest power spectrum from the XQ-100 Legacy Survey , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466 (2017) 4332 [1702.01761]

  2. [18]

    Boera, G.D

    E. Boera, G.D. Becker, J.S. Bolton and F. Nasir, Revealing Reionization with the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium: New Constraints from the Ly α Flux Power Spectrum , Astrophys. J. 872 (2019) 101 [ 1809.06980]

  3. [1]

    M. Viel, S. Matarrese, H.J. Mo, M.G. Haehnelt and T. Theuns, Probing the intergalactic medium with the Ly α forest along multiple lines of sight to distant QSOs , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 329 (2002) 848 [ astro-ph/0105233]. – 14 – Input: zstart ; /* initial redshift */ zend ; /* boundary value of redshift ( zend <z start) */ step ; /* step size of the ca...

  4. [2]

    M. Viel, S. Matarrese, H.J. Mo, T. Theuns and M.G. Haehnelt, Modelling the IGM and the Ly α forest at high redshift from the dark matter distribution , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 336 (2002) 685 [ astro-ph/0203418]

  5. [3]

    Simulated evolution of the dark matter large-scale structure

    M. Demia´ nski, A. Doroshkevich, S. Pilipenko and S. Gottl¨ ober,Simulated evolution of the dark matter large-scale structure of the Universe , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414 (2011) 1813 [1102.2951]

  6. [4]

    Font-Ribera, P

    A. Font-Ribera, P. McDonald and J. Miralda-Escud´ e,Generating mock data sets for large-scale Lyman-α forest correlation measurements, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012 (2012) [1108.5606]

  7. [5]

    Chabanier, N

    S. Chabanier, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, J.-M. Le Goff, E. Armengaud, J. Bautista et al., The one-dimensional power spectrum from the SDSS DR14 Ly α forests, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2019 (2019) 017 [ 1812.03554]

  8. [6]

    du Mas des Bourboux, J

    H. du Mas des Bourboux, J. Rich, A. Font-Ribera, V. de Sainte Agathe, J. Farr, T. Etourneau et al., The Completed SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations with Ly α Forests, Astrophys. J. 901 (2020) 153 [ 2007.08995]. – 15 – Input: T0,n H i,n H ii,n He i,n He ii,n He iii,n e; dt; Treecool;z;a;H Output: T0,n H ...

Show all 44 references
  1. [7]

    H.G. Bi, G. Boerner and Y. Chu, An alternative model for the Ly-alpha absorption forest. , Astron. Astrophys. 266 (1992) 1

  2. [8]

    Bi, Lyman-Alpha Absorption Spectrum of the Primordial Intergalactic Medium , Astrophys

    H. Bi, Lyman-Alpha Absorption Spectrum of the Primordial Intergalactic Medium , Astrophys. J. 405 (1993) 479

  3. [9]

    H. Bi, J. Ge and L.-Z. Fang, A Simulation of LY alpha Absorption Forests in Linear Approximation of Cold Dark Matter and Cold Plus Hot Dark Matter Models , Astrophys. J. 452 (1995) 90 [ astro-ph/9504061]

  4. [10]

    Bi and A.F

    H. Bi and A.F. Davidsen, Evolution of Structure in the Intergalactic Medium and the Nature of the Ly α Forest, Astrophys. J. 479 (1997) 523 [ astro-ph/9611062]. – 16 –

  5. [11]

    Petitjean, J.P

    P. Petitjean, J.P. Mueket and R.E. Kates, The Ly α forest at low redshift: tracing the dark matter filaments. , Astron. Astrophys. 295 (1995) L9 [ astro-ph/9502100]

  6. [12]

    Croft, D.H

    R.A.C. Croft, D.H. Weinberg, M. Bolte, S. Burles, L. Hernquist, N. Katz et al., Toward a precise measurement of matter clustering: Ly α forest data at redshifts 2–4 , Astrophys. J. 581 (2002) 20–52

  7. [13]

    Coles and B

    P. Coles and B. Jones, A lognormal model for the cosmological mass distribution. , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 248 (1991) 1

  8. [14]

    Hui and N.Y

    L. Hui and N.Y. Gnedin, Equation of state of the photoionized intergalactic medium , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 292 (1997) 27 [ astro-ph/9612232]

  9. [15]

    Choudhury, R

    T.R. Choudhury, R. Srianand and T. Padmanabhan, Semianalytic Approach to Understanding the Distribution of Neutral Hydrogen in the Universe: Comparison of Simulations with Observations, Astrophys. J. 559 (2001) 29 [ astro-ph/0012498]

  10. [16]

    Arya, T.R

    B. Arya, T.R. Choudhury, A. Paranjape and P. Gaikwad, Lognormal seminumerical simulations of the Lyman α forest: comparison with full hydrodynamic simulations , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 520 (2023) 4023 [ 2206.08013]

  11. [17]

    B. Arya, T. Roy Choudhury, A. Paranjape and P. Gaikwad, A modified lognormal approximation of the Lyman- α forest: comparison with full hydrodynamic simulations at 2 ≤ z ≤ 2.7, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2024 (2024) 063 [ 2310.12720]

  12. [19]

    Walther, J

    M. Walther, J. O˜ norbe, J.F. Hennawi and Z. Luki´ c,New Constraints on IGM Thermal Evolution from the Ly α Forest Power Spectrum, Astrophys. J. 872 (2019) 13 [ 1808.04367]

  13. [20]

    Gaikwad, R

    P. Gaikwad, R. Srianand, M.G. Haehnelt and T.R. Choudhury, A consistent and robust measurement of the thermal state of the IGM at 2 ≤ z ≤ 4 from a large sample of Ly α forest spectra: evidence for late and rapid He II reionization , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 506 (2021) 4389 [2...

  14. [21]

    McDonald, J

    P. McDonald, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, M. Rauch, W.L.W. Sargent, T.A. Barlow, R. Cen et al., The Observed Probability Distribution Function, Power Spectrum, and Correlation Function of the Transmitted Flux in the Ly α Forest, Astrophys. J. 543 (2000) 1 [ astro-ph/9911196]

  15. [22]

    M. Viel, J. Weller and M.G. Haehnelt, Constraints on the primordial power spectrum from high-resolution Lyman α forest spectra and WMAP, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 355 (2004) L23 [astro-ph/0407294]

  16. [23]

    Planck Collaboration, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown et al., Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters , Astron. Astrophys. 571 (2014) A16 [1303.5076]

  17. [24]

    Lewis, A

    A. Lewis, A. Challinor and A. Lasenby, Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Models, Astrophys. J. 538 (2000) 473 [ astro-ph/9911177]

  18. [25]

    Rauch, J

    M. Rauch, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, W.L.W. Sargent, T.A. Barlow, D.H. Weinberg, L. Hernquist et al., The Opacity of the Ly α Forest and Implications for Ωb and the Ionizing Background , Astrophys. J. 489 (1997) 7 [ astro-ph/9612245]

  19. [26]

    Villasenor, B

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider, Effects of Photoionization and Photoheating on Ly α Forest Properties from Cholla Cosmological Simulations , Astrophys. J. 912 (2021) [ 2009.06652]. – 17 –

  20. [28]

    Walther, J.F

    M. Walther, J.F. Hennawi, H. Hiss, J. O˜ norbe, K.-G. Lee, A. Rorai et al., A New Precision Measurement of the Small-scale Line-of-sight Power Spectrum of the Ly α Forest, Astrophys. J. 852 (2018) 22 [ 1709.07354]

  21. [29]

    Villasenor, B

    B. Villasenor, B. Robertson, P. Madau and E. Schneider, Inferring the Thermal History of the Intergalactic Medium from the Properties of the Hydrogen and Helium Ly α Forest, Astrophys. J. 933 (2022) 59 [ 2111.00019]

  22. [30]

    Lewis and S

    A. Lewis and S. Bridle, Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 103511 [ astro-ph/0205436]

  23. [31]

    Lewis, Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters , Phys

    A. Lewis, Efficient sampling of fast and slow cosmological parameters , Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 103529 [1304.4473]

  24. [32]

    Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, “Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019, Oct., 2019

  25. [33]

    Torrado and A

    J. Torrado and A. Lewis, Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models , J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2021 (2021) 057 [ 2005.05290]

  26. [34]

    Gelman and D.B

    A. Gelman and D.B. Rubin, Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , Statistical Science 7 (1992) 457

  27. [35]

    Faucher-Gigu` ere,A cosmic UV/X-ray background model update , Mon

    C.-A. Faucher-Gigu` ere,A cosmic UV/X-ray background model update , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493 (2020) 1614 [ 1903.08657]

  28. [36]

    Haardt and P

    F. Haardt and P. Madau, Radiative Transfer in a Clumpy Universe. IV. New Synthesis Models of the Cosmic UV/X-Ray Background , Astrophys. J. 746 (2012) 125 [ 2406.15237]

  29. [37]

    Puchwein, F

    E. Puchwein, F. Haardt, M.G. Haehnelt and P. Madau, Consistent modelling of the meta-galactic UV background and the thermal/ionization history of the intergalactic medium , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485 (2019) 47 [ 1801.04931]

  30. [38]

    Schaye, Explaining the Lyman-alpha forest , arXiv e-prints (2001) astro [ astro-ph/0112022]

    J. Schaye, Explaining the Lyman-alpha forest , arXiv e-prints (2001) astro [ astro-ph/0112022]

  31. [39]

    Miralda-Escud´ e and M.J

    J. Miralda-Escud´ e and M.J. Rees,Reionization and thermal evolution of a photoionized intergalactic medium., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 266 (1994) 343

  32. [40]

    McQuinn and P.R

    M. McQuinn and P.R. Upton Sanderbeck, On the intergalactic temperature-density relation , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 456 (2016) 47 [ 1505.07875]

  33. [41]

    Katz, D.H

    N. Katz, D.H. Weinberg and L. Hernquist, Cosmological Simulations with TreeSPH, Astrophys. J.s 105 (1996) 19 [ astro-ph/9509107]

  34. [42]

    Nagamine, The Encyclopedia of Cosmology

    K. Nagamine, The Encyclopedia of Cosmology. Volume 2: Numerical Simulations in Cosmology, World Scientific Publishing (2018), 10.1142/9496-vol2

  35. [43]

    Smith, G.L

    B.D. Smith, G.L. Bryan, S.C.O. Glover, N.J. Goldbaum, M.J. Turk, J. Regan et al., GRACKLE: a chemistry and cooling library for astrophysics , Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 466 (2017) 2217 [ 1610.09591]

  36. [44]

    Anninos, Y

    P. Anninos, Y. Zhang, T. Abel and M.L. Norman, Cosmological hydrodynamics with multi-species chemistry and nonequilibrium ionization and cooling , New Astronomy 2 (1997) 209 [astro-ph/9608041]. – 18 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.