REVIEW 3 cited by
Disentangling Dense Embeddings with Sparse Autoencoders
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have shown promise in extracting interpretable features from complex neural networks. We present one of the first applications of SAEs to dense text embeddings from large language models, demonstrating their effectiveness in disentangling semantic concepts. By training SAEs on embeddings of over 420,000 scientific paper abstracts from computer science and astronomy, we show that the resulting sparse representations maintain semantic fidelity while offering interpretability. We analyse these learned features, exploring their behaviour across different model capacities and introducing a novel method for identifying ``feature families'' that represent related concepts at varying levels of abstraction. To demonstrate the practical utility of our approach, we show how these interpretable features can be used to precisely steer semantic search, allowing for fine-grained control over query semantics. This work bridges the gap between the semantic richness of dense embeddings and the interpretability of sparse representations. We open source our embeddings, trained sparse autoencoders, and interpreted features, as well as a web app for exploring them.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Sparse Autoencoders, Again?
VAEase gates the VAE decoder input by the encoder's variance, combining sparse-autoencoder adaptive sparsity with a hyperparameter-free loss; a global-minimizer theorem says active latent dimensions recover per-manifo...
-
Isotropy Cliffs: The Geometric Signature of Decision-Making in Large Language Models
Across five LLMs, a sharp decrease in embedding isotropy at a critical layer predicts multiple-choice accuracy, with Spearman correlations up to -0.92.
-
Position: Text Embeddings Should Capture Implicit Semantics, Not Just Surface Meaning
State-of-the-art text embeddings lag far behind on tasks requiring pragmatic inference, stance detection, and social meaning, relative to their strong performance on surface semantic benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.