Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 39 references

Condensation of Magnetic Fluxes and Landscape of QCD Vacuum

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that pure Yang–Mills theory has exact vortex-lattice solutions whose vacuum is a degenerate landscape of barrier-separated classical configurations.

desk verdict The barrier calculation in this preprint is algebraically wrong — the energy density goes negative — so the landscape claim fails, despite an honestly written construction. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.15608 v1 pith:VGSBRSLI submitted 2024-11-23 hep-th hep-phmath-phmath.MP

George Savvidy This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-phmath-phmath.MP MSC 81T1381V05 PACS 11.15.-q12.38.-t
keywords Yang-MillsvacuumchromomagneticvorticesexactsolutionsflatconnectionspotentialbarriersdualsuperconductorQCDgaugefieldsingularities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the sourceless Yang–Mills equation has a new family of exact, non-perturbative solutions: superpositions of oppositely oriented chromomagnetic flux tubes, arranged like a lattice of Abrikosov–Nielsen–Olesen vortices. The field strength for these solutions is a constant chromomagnetic field, and when the parameters satisfy $g\vec H=\vec a\times\vec b$ it vanishes, leaving flat vacuum connections. Those flat vacua are degenerate, are separated from each other and from the trivial vacuum by potential barriers, and so form a complicated landscape of the QCD vacuum. A sympathetic reader would care because the existence of such a vacuum landscape would give pure Yang–Mills theory a concrete dual-superconductor mechanism for confinement, without introducing fundamental scalar fields.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the factored ansatz $A^a_\mu=B_\mu n^a+\frac{1}{g}\epsilon^{abc}n^b\partial_\mu n^c$, in which the non-Abelian field strength factorises as $G^a_{\mu\nu}=(F_{\mu\nu}+\frac{1}{g}S_{\mu\nu})n^a$, reducing the equation to conditions on the Abelian field $B_\mu$ and the colour vector $n^a$. The vector (2.6), built from an arbitrary function $\theta(X)$ and a second linear form $Y$, has planar singularities where $\sin\theta(X)=0$; the paper asserts that the singular parts of the Yang–Mills equation cancel there. The barrier calculation uses a singular gauge transformation $U$ that maps the configuration to the constant field (3.12) and an interpolation path $w(\alpha)$ between the two configurations; the resulting energy-density functional (4.21) is what exhibits the barrier.

What would settle it

Evaluate the full Yang–Mills expression $\nabla^{ab}_\mu G^{b\mu\nu}$ for the potential (2.8) as a distribution in a neighbourhood of a plane $\theta(X_s)=2\pi N$, including contributions from the fast-oscillating terms; if the singular coefficients do not cancel, the configuration is not a solution. A numerical check of the residual on a grid including the singular plane would settle the same question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the gauge potential (2.8), obtained from the factored ansatz (2.3) with the space-time-dependent colour unit vector (2.6), is an exact solution of the sourceless Yang–Mills equation, with the singularities of the potential located on the planes where $\sin\theta(X)=0$ but with a regular field strength $G^a_{12}(x)=\frac{ab-gH}{g}n^a(x)$ and constant energy density $\epsilon=\frac{(gH-ab)^2}{2g^2}$. At $gH=ab$ the field strength vanishes and (2.8) reduces to the flat vacuum connection (4.18), which is a pure gauge of the form $-\frac{i}{g}S^{-1}\nabla S$. The paper then computes, by interpolating linearly between the initial and final configurations, that these degenerate vacua are separated by potential barriers whose energy density is (4.21), and it interprets the collection of such solutions, parameterized by the vectors $\vec H,\vec a,\vec b$ and the arbitrary function $\theta$, as a landscape of classical vacua of pure Yang–Mills theory.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the singular terms in the Yang–Mills equation cancel on the planes where $\sin\theta(X)=0$, so that the potential (2.8) solves the equation in a neighbourhood of those planes; this cancellation is asserted and deferred to earlier work, not demonstrated in this paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the solutions are genuine, pure Yang–Mills theory has infinitely many degenerate classical vacua labelled by the vectors $\vec H,\vec a,\vec b$ and the function $\theta$, so the classical vacuum is a moduli space, not a single point.
  • The energy density (4.16) is lowered from $\frac12 H^2$ by vacuum polarisation and reaches zero exactly when $g\vec H=\vec a\times\vec b$, so the flat connections are dynamically selected vacua.
  • The flat connections are pure gauge but not continuously reachable from $A=0$ without climbing the barrier (4.21), so transitions between vacua require tunnelling; in the quantum theory this suggests a $\theta$-vacuum-like superposition over orientations.
  • The lattice of chromomagnetic vortices provides a concrete realisation of the dual-superconductor picture: the vortices are the dual analogue of Cooper-pair condensate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the paper leaves open whether tunnelling solutions exist; a concrete extension would be to search for instanton-like configurations whose action is controlled by the barrier height (4.21), proportional to $a^2b^2/g^2$.
  • Inference: the analogy with exponentially degenerate spin systems points toward subsystem-symmetry and fracton physics; identifying the operators that create or move the vortex sheets would test whether the vacuum landscape has exotic excitations.
  • Inference: a numerical residual check of (2.8) on lattices that resolve the singular planes, for several choices of $\theta$, would settle the exactness claim independently of the deferred proof.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to construct new exact solutions of the sourceless Yang-Mills equation, built from an Ansatz with a space-time dependent colour unit vector, and to show that these solutions form a landscape of degenerate classical vacua separated by potential barriers. The solutions are taken from the author's previous work; the new content is the computation of barrier energy densities in Sections 3 and 4, and the interpretation of flat connections as vacua. The abstract further proposes that these configurations describe a lattice of dense chromomagnetic vortices analogous to a dual superconductor.

Significance. If correct, the paper would establish a large moduli space of classical Yang-Mills vacua with nontrivial barrier structure, which would be a significant development for the classical and possibly quantum vacuum of QCD. The construction is explicit and the claimed energy densities are simple. However, the central new derivation—the barrier formula—is internally inconsistent and produces negative energy densities for real gauge fields, which is impossible for the Yang-Mills energy functional. The exactness of the base solutions is also only asserted by reference to previous papers, not demonstrated here. These issues prevent the claimed landscape from being established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (3.14)] The energy density formula (3.14) cannot be the Yang-Mills energy density because it takes negative values for real gauge fields. For example, at α = 0 (so that w− = w+ = 1/2) and with cos f = −0.99, sin² f = 0.0199, the bracket on the right-hand side of (3.14) evaluates to approximately −0.300, and the energy density becomes approximately −0.150 a²b²/g². Since (1/4)G^a_ij G^a_ij is a sum of squares for any real configuration, the interpolated field (3.13) must give a nonnegative energy density. This is a load-bearing inconsistency for the barrier computation.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (3.15)] Equation (3.15) is presented as the specialization of (3.14) to the linear interpolation w(α) = 1/2 − α, but substituting w− = 1/2 − α and w+ = 1/2 + α into (3.14) does not yield (3.15). After multiplying the bracket in (3.14) by 16, the constant term is 13 and the α² coefficient is 8, whereas (3.15) has constant term 12 and α² coefficient 16. The two expressions cannot both equal the same gauge-invariant energy density, so at least one of them is incorrect. This inconsistency propagates to (4.19) and (4.21).
  3. [Section 2, around Eq. (2.7)] The claim that the gauge potential (2.8) is an exact solution relies on an unshown cancellation of singular terms in the Yang-Mills equation at the planes where sin θ(X) = 0. The manuscript only asserts this cancellation and refers to Refs. [13,14,15], without including the distributional calculation or the proof that the field strength is regular. This verification is load-bearing because the constancy of the energy density (2.10) and the subsequent barrier analysis depend on (2.8) being a genuine solution everywhere.
  4. [Section 4, Eq. (4.21)] The barrier between flat vacuum connections at gH = ab suffers from the same sign defect as (3.14). For α = 0 and cos f = −0.99, the bracket 2 cos f + sin² f equals approximately −1.9601, so the claimed energy density (4.21) is negative. Since the true energy density of the interpolated configuration is nonnegative, the statement that these flat connections are separated by a potential barrier is not established.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, acknowledgments] The name 'Tor Vegata' should be 'Tor Vergata'.
  2. [Throughout] The manuscript does not clearly state which results are new in this paper and which are imported from Ref. [13,14,15]. A table or explicit statement of novelty would help the reader.
  3. [Section 4, Eq. (4.19)] The notation 'f′x(ax)²' is ambiguous; it should be written as (f'(ax))² or with explicit parentheses to avoid confusion between derivatives and powers.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Central exact-solution claim is imported from the author's own prior papers, but the barrier and landscape computation is an internal exercise with independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Section 2, after Eq. (2.8); also Section 4 before Eq. (4.16)]
    "One can verify explicitly that it is a solution of the Yang Mills equation [13, 14, 15]."

    The paper's central premise—that the gauge potential (2.8) solves the sourceless Yang-Mills equation, and hence that the subsequent barrier and landscape analysis concerns true solutions—is not derived in the paper. It is asserted and deferred entirely to refs. [13,14,15], all authored by the same author. The singular-cancellation claim on the planes (2.7) is likewise only asserted ('it appears that ... compensate each other') and deferred. Every later quantity, including the barrier formulas (3.14), (4.16), and (4.21), inherits this unverified input. Insofar as [13,14,15] are the sole support for the exactness claim, the load-bearing part of the derivation reduces to a self-citation chain rather than to an independent first-principles verification.

full rationale

The paper contains no fitted parameters, no data-driven predictions, and no quantity that is defined in terms of a target result it then claims to predict. The barrier and landscape formulas are obtained by substituting explicit interpolated fields into the Yang-Mills energy functional, so those computations do not reduce by construction to their inputs. The one circularity-relevant feature is load-bearing self-citation: the exact-solution status of the central configuration (2.8), which is the premise that makes the landscape discussion meaningful, is not demonstrated in the paper but is attributed entirely to the author's own refs. [13,14,15]; the singular-cancellation assertion on the planes (2.7) is similarly deferred. If those references do not independently establish the solution, the paper's claims are unsupported. Nevertheless, the barrier computation itself (Section 3, Eq. (3.14); Section 4, Eq. (4.21)) is an internal calculation with independent content, so the score is moderate. The apparent internal inconsistency of (3.14) with the defining relation ε=(1/4)G^a_ij G^a_ij≥0 is a correctness problem rather than a circularity, and is not counted here.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an Ansatz from prior literature, a speculative singularity cancellation, an unproven regularity assertion, and a barrier calculation that is algebraically inconsistent. The arbitrary function f(ax) provides an infinite-dimensional moduli space but is not fitted to data; it is a functional degree of freedom. No genuinely new independent entity with external evidence is introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • arbitrary moduli function f(ax) and constants a,b,H = none (moduli)
    The general solution (2.6) contains an arbitrary function theta(X)=f(ax) and constants a,b,H. They parametrize the claimed vacuum degeneracy and enter the barrier formulas; no specific form is fixed by the dynamics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Cho decomposition Ansatz (2.3) captures the relevant sourceless Yang-Mills solutions.
    The paper assumes the gauge field can be written as B_mu n^a + (1/g) epsilon^{abc} n^b d_mu n^c with unit n^a; this is a standard decomposition but restricts the class of solutions under study.
  • ad hoc to paper Singular terms in the Yang-Mills equation cancel at the planes theta(X)=2pi N.
    The paper asserts the equation is fulfilled near singular planes because two singular terms compensate, citing [13-15] without showing the cancellation; this is a load-bearing premise for the exact-solution claim.
  • ad hoc to paper The field strength tensor is regular at the singular planes even though n^a has no limit there.
    Claimed in Sections 1 and 2; the rapidly oscillating n^a near theta(X)=2pi N does not have a pointwise limit, so regularity needs a distributional definition not provided.
  • ad hoc to paper Energy density along the interpolating path is given by the truncated expression (3.14).
    The barrier formulas omit components of the field strength, allowing negative energy densities; this is used to claim the vacua are separated by barriers.
invented entities (1)
  • Lattice of dense chromomagnetic vortices in pure Yang-Mills
    purpose: To interpret the solutions as a dual-superconductor analog of Cooper-pair condensate.
    The paper proposes this interpretation, but the energy density (2.10) is spatially constant, with no localized flux-tube profile, and no experimental or numerical handle outside the paper is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Condensation of Magnetic Fluxes and Landscape of QCD Vacuum." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VGSBRSLI

@misc{pith2026241115608,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Condensation of Magnetic Fluxes and Landscape of QCD Vacuum},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VGSBRSLI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.15608}
}
read the original abstract

I discuss new non-perturbative solutions of the sourceless Yang-Mills equation representing the superposition of oppositely oriented chromomagnetic flux tubes (vortices) similar in their form to a lattice of superposed Abrikosov-Nielsen-Olesen chromomagnetic vortices. These solutions represent highly degenerate classical vacua of the Yang Mills theory that are separated by potential barriers and are forming a complicated potential landscape of the QCD vacuum. It is suggested that the solutions describe a lattice of dense chromomagnetic vortices representing a dual analog of the Cooper pairs condensate in a superconductor.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ’t Hooft, Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confin ement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Topology of the Gauge Condition and New Confin ement Phases in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981 ) 455–478. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90442-9

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90442-9 1981

  2. [2]

    ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in No nabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Property of Electric and Magnetic Flux in No nabelian Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 141–160. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90595-9 1979

  3. [3]

    Mandelstam, Charge - Monopole Duality and the Phases o f Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys

    S. Mandelstam, Charge - Monopole Duality and the Phases o f Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 2391. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2391

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.2391 1979

  4. [4]

    ’t Hooft, On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Qu ark Confinement, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, On the Phase Transition Towards Permanent Qu ark Confinement, Nucl. Phys. B 138 (1978) 1–25. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90153-0

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90153-0 1978

  5. [5]

    Mandelstam, General Introduction to Confinement, Phy s

    S. Mandelstam, General Introduction to Confinement, Phy s. Rept. 67 (1980) 109. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(80)90083-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(80)90083-6 1980

  6. [6]

    Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics 121 (3) (1989) 351 – 399

    E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics 121 (3) (1989) 351 – 399

    work page 1989

  7. [7]

    N. J. Hitchin, The self-duality equations on a riemann su rface, Pro- ceedings of the London Mathematical Society s3-55 (1) (1987 ) 59–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.59

    doi:10.1112/plms/s3-55.1.59 1987

  8. [8]

    Gukov, E

    S. Gukov, E. Witten, Gauge Theory, Ramification, And The G eometric Langlands Pro- gram, arXiv:hep-th/0612073

    arXiv

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    Gukov, E

    S. Gukov, E. Witten, Rigid Surface Operators, Adv. Theor . Math. Phys. 14 (1) (2010) 87–178. arXiv:0804.1561, doi:10.4310/ATMP.2010.v14.n1.a3. 7

    2010 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Kapustin, Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimens ional gauge theories and S-duality, Phys

    A. Kapustin, Wilson-’t Hooft operators in four-dimens ional gauge theories and S-duality, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 025005. arXiv:hep-th/0501015, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.025005

    2006 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Kapustin, E

    A. Kapustin, E. Witten, Electric-Magnetic Duality And The Geometric Langlands Program, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 1 (2007) 1–236. arXiv:hep-th/0604151, doi:10.4310/CNTP.2007.v1.n1.a1

    2007 arXiv

  4. [12]

    DeBenedictis, Some singular spacetimes and their po ssible alternatives, Particles 7 (2024) 899

    A. DeBenedictis, Some singular spacetimes and their po ssible alternatives, Particles 7 (2024) 899. arXiv:2410.10541, doi:10.3390/particles7040054

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Savvidy, Covariantly constant Yang Mills vacuum fiel ds and condensation of magnetic fluxes, Phys

    G. Savvidy, Covariantly constant Yang Mills vacuum fiel ds and condensation of magnetic fluxes, Phys. Lett. B 852 (2024) 138612. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138612

    2024

  6. [14]

    Savvidy, How large is the space of covariantly consta nt gauge fields, Nucl

    G. Savvidy, How large is the space of covariantly consta nt gauge fields, Nucl. Phys. B 1004 (2024) 116561. arXiv:2401.06728, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116561

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Savvidy, Landscape of QCD Vacuum, arXiv:2407.00318

    G. Savvidy, Landscape of QCD Vacuum, arXiv:2407.00318

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    I. A. Batalin, S. G. Matinyan, G. K. Savvidy, Vacuum Pola rization by a Source-Free Gauge Field, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 26 (1977) 214

    1977

  9. [17]

    G. K. Savvidy, Infrared Instability of the Vacuum State of Gauge Theories and Asymptotic Freedom, Phys. Lett. B 71 (1977) 133–134. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90759-6

    1977 doi

  10. [18]

    S. G. Matinyan, G. K. Savvidy, Vacuum Polarization Indu ced by the Intense Gauge Field, Nucl. Phys. B 134 (1978) 539–545. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90463-7

    1978 doi

  11. [19]

    M. R. Brown, M. J. Duff, Exact Results for Effective Lagran gians, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2124–2135. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.2124

    1975 doi

  12. [20]

    M. J. Duff, M. Ramon-Medrano, On the Effective Lagrangian for the Yang-Mills Field, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 3357. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.12.3357

    1975 doi

  13. [21]

    Y. M. Cho, A Restricted Gauge Theory, Phys. Rev. D 21 (198 0) 1080. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.1080

    doi

  14. [22]

    Y. M. Cho, Extended Gauge Theory and Its Mass Spectrum, P hys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2415. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.2415. 8

    1981 doi

  15. [23]

    Y. M. Cho, QCD effective action and stability of magnetic condensation, Nucl. Phys. A 844 (2010) 120C–137C. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2010.05.023

    2010 doi

  16. [24]

    ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theorie s, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic Monopoles in Unified Gauge Theorie s, Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276–284. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90486-6

    1974 doi

  17. [25]

    Corrigan, D

    E. Corrigan, D. I. Olive, D. B. Fairlie, J. Nuyts, Magnet ic Monopoles in SU(3) Gauge Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 475–492. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(76)90173-5

    1976 doi

  18. [26]

    Biran, E

    B. Biran, E. G. F. Floratos, G. K. Savvidy, The Selfdual C losed Bosonic Membranes, Phys. Lett. B 198 (1987) 329–332. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90673-3

    1987 doi

  19. [27]

    Jackiw, C

    R. Jackiw, C. Rebbi, Vacuum Periodicity in a Yang-Mills Quantum Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 172–175. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.37.172

    1976 doi

  20. [28]

    C. G. Callan, Jr., R. F. Dashen, D. J. Gross, The Structur e of the Gauge Theory Vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 63 (1976) 334–340. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(76)90277-X

    1976 doi

  21. [29]

    Jackiw, Introduction to the Yang-Mills Quantum Theo ry, Rev

    R. Jackiw, Introduction to the Yang-Mills Quantum Theo ry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980) 661–673. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.52.661

    1980 doi

  22. [30]

    G. K. Savvidy, F. J. Wegner, Geometrical string and spin systems, Nucl. Phys. B 413 (1994) 605–613. arXiv:hep-th/9308094, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90003-5

    1994 arXiv

  23. [31]

    G. K. Savvidy, The System with exponentially degenerat e vacuum state, arXiv:cond-mat/0003220

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    G. K. Savvidy, K. G. Savvidy, Self-avoiding gonihedric string and spin systems, Phys. Lett. B 324 (1994) 72–77. arXiv:hep-lat/9311026, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)00114-6

    1994 arXiv

  25. [33]

    G. K. Savvidy, K. G. Savvidy, Interaction hierarchy, Ph ys. Lett. B 337 (1994) 333–339. arXiv:hep-th/9409030, doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)90984-9

    1994 arXiv

  26. [34]

    G. K. Savvidy, K. G. Savvidy, F. J. Wegner, Geometrical s tring and dual spin systems, Nucl. Phys. B 443 (1995) 565–580. arXiv:hep-th/9503213, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00151-H

    1995 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Pietig, F

    R. Pietig, F. J. Wegner, Phase transition in lattice sur face systems with go- nihedric action, Nucl. Phys. B 466 (1996) 513–526. arXiv:hep-lat/9604013, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00072-7. 9

    1996 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Pietig, F

    R. Pietig, F. J. Wegner, Low temperature expansion of th e gonihedric Ising model, Nucl. Phys. B 525 (1998) 549–570. arXiv:hep-lat/9712002, doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00342-3

    1998 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Sherrington, S

    D. Sherrington, S. Kirkpatrick, Solvable Model of a Spi n-Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 1792–1796. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.35.1792

    1975 doi

  30. [38]

    Castelnovo, C

    C. Castelnovo, C. Chamon, D. Sherrington, Quantum mech anical and information theo- retic view on classical glass transitions, PRB 81 (18) (2010 ) 184303. arXiv:1003.3832, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.184303

    2010 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Vijay, J

    S. Vijay, J. Haah, L. Fu, Fracton Topological Order, Gen eralized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality, Phys. Rev. B 94 (23) (2016) 235157. arXiv:1603.04442, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235157. 10

    2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.