Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in ternary actinium beryllium hydrides at low pressure

2); (2) Institut fur Festkorpertheorie und -optik; (3) Institute of Physics; (4) Institut fur Physik; Application; Artur P. Durajski (3); China; Czestochowa; Czestochowa University of Technology; Electronic Engineering

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 61 references

Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in ternary actinium beryllium hydrides at low pressure

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper predicts that the ternary hydride fcc AcBeH8 remains dynamically stable down to 10 GPa and superconducts at 181 K, thanks to BeH8 units acting as chemical precompressors.

desk verdict A competent hydride-prediction paper with a genuinely new low-pressure claim for fcc AcBeH8, but the 181 K Tc rests on a harmonic, under-specified strong-coupling calculation that needs anharmonic and numerical scrutiny before the number is taken seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.19028 v2 pith:VJBSA432 submitted 2024-11-28 cond-mat.supr-con

Kun Gao (1 , 2) , Wenwen Cui (1) , Jingming Shi (1) , Artur P. Durajski (3) , Jian Hao (1) , Silvana Botti (2) , Miguel A. L. Marques (4)

show 19 more authors

Yinwei Li (1) ((1) Laboratory of Quantum Functional Materials Design Application School of Physics Electronic Engineering Jiangsu Normal University Xuzhou China (2) Institut fur Festkorpertheorie und -optik Friedrich-Schiller-Universit at Jena Jena Germany (3) Institute of Physics Czestochowa University of Technology Czestochowa Poland (4) Institut fur Physik Martin-Luther-Universit at Halle-Wittenberg Halle Germany)

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.supr-con

keywords high-temperaturesuperconductivityhydridesuperconductorschemicalprecompressionberylliumhydridesactiniumelectron-phononcouplingstructurepredictionlow-pressure

topics High-Temperature Superconductivity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that adding beryllium to actinium hydrides can drastically lower the pressure at which high-temperature superconductivity appears. Using structure prediction and first-principles phonon calculations, it identifies three thermodynamically stable and four metastable Ac-Be-H compounds, all metallic and superconducting. The standout prediction is fcc AcBeH8, whose phonon spectrum remains stable down to 10 GPa, where the calculated transition temperature is 181 K. If correct, this would put a phonon-mediated superconductor above 180 K at a pressure that is readily reachable in the laboratory, and it would validate the idea that BeH8 units act as chemical precompressors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the BeH8 unit: a beryllium atom coordinated by eight hydrogens, embedded in an fcc lattice of large actinium atoms. It functions as a chemical precompressor by donating electrons, breaking H-H bonds, and replacing part of the hydrogen network with Be-H bonds. Near 10 GPa the argument turns on soft phonon modes in the 110–540 cm$^{-1}$ range, mainly hydrogen vibrations at the W point with $C_{2v}$ symmetry, that contribute about 60% of the electron-phonon coupling $\lambda = 4.50$; the paper links their softening to increased Fermi-surface nesting along W-L and X-W-K.

What would settle it

Compute the anharmonic phonon self-energy of fcc AcBeH8 at 10 GPa for the 110–540 cm$^{-1}$ modes: if any of these modes acquires a large imaginary anharmonic correction, the dynamic stability claim fails. Alternatively, synthesize or compress fcc AcBeH8 to 10 GPa and measure the resistivity; the absence of a superconducting transition near 181 K would falsify the $T_c$ prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the Ac-Be-H phase diagram contains a metastable fcc phase, AcBeH8, that remains dynamically stable from 200 GPa down to 10 GPa, with the electron-phonon coupling constant rising to $\lambda = 4.50$ and a predicted $T_c$ of 181 K at the lowest pressure. The paper reports other superconducting members of the same family: fcc AcBeH10 with $T_c \approx 165$ K at 300 GPa, AcBe2H16 with $T_c \approx 150$ K at 200 GPa, and thermodynamically stable phases with $T_c$ up to about 115 K at 200 GPa. It attributes the low-pressure behavior to BeH8 units embedded in the fcc actinium lattice: as pressure drops, soft phonon modes in the 110–540 cm$^{-1}$ range, dominated by hydrogen in those units, contribute about 60% of $\lambda$, and Fermi-surface nesting along W-L and X-W-K tracks the softening. The paper frames this as evidence that light-element M-H units can precompress hydrogen and stabilize high-$T_c$ hydride superconductivity close to ambient pressure.

Load-bearing premise

The prediction assumes that the harmonic approximation for lattice vibrations and the standard phonon-mediated superconductivity formulas with $\mu^* = 0.10$ remain accurate for the very soft hydrogen modes at 10 GPa, where $\lambda$ reaches 4.5; if those modes are strongly anharmonic, the lattice could be unstable or the $T_c$ overestimated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If fcc AcBeH8 is made, it should show a superconducting transition near 181 K at 10 GPa, a pressure routine in diamond-anvil experiments, making this one of the lowest-pressure high-$T_c$ hydride predictions.
The BeH8 chemical-precompression motif, already proposed for lanthanum and yttrium hydrides, would be shown to operate in actinium compounds and to keep the fcc lattice dynamically stable down to 10 GPa.
The other predicted phases widen the superconducting hydride family, with $T_c$ values of 78–165 K at 200–300 GPa for AcBe2H12, AcBe2H16, and fcc AcBeH10, and about 115 K for the thermodynamically stable AcBe2H10 at 200 GPa.
If the mechanism is general, adding Be or similar light metals to other high-pressure binary hydrides could lower their stabilization pressures while preserving high $T_c$, giving a concrete search strategy for near-ambient-pressure hydride superconductors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not treat anharmonicity; if the soft 110–540 cm$^{-1}$ modes at 10 GPa are strongly anharmonic, the harmonic phonon picture could overestimate both the stability region and $T_c$, so an anharmonic self-energy calculation is the most direct next test.
Because the nesting function rises along W-L and X-W-K at low pressure, electron or hole doping of fcc AcBeH8 might tune the soft-mode coupling and hence $T_c$, an extension the paper does not explore.
The fcc AcBeH8 motif may be transferable to other large electropositive metals, yielding a family of MH8-based low-pressure superconductors, but the paper does not perform that substitution search.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Worth a look if you follow hydride superconductors. The genuinely new piece is the full Ac-Be-H convex hull at 200 GPa and the claim that fcc AcBeH8 stays dynamically stable down to 10 GPa with high Tc. The fcc phase's superconductivity itself isn't new—Wan et al. already predicted Tc 284 K at 150 GPa for the same structure—but the low-pressure extension and the broader phase diagram are not in that earlier work. The paper is honest about the comparison, which I appreciate.

What's done well: the structure search is standard but careful (CALYPSO, 2000+ structures per composition, convergence checks), the convex-hull analysis is clean, and the phonon and EPC calculations for seven compounds are internally consistent. The qualitative story—Be-H units act as a chemical precompressor and soften modes that drive strong coupling as pressure drops—is plausible and fits the LaBeH8/YBeH8 pattern. The authors also report both Allen-Dynes and numerically solved Eliashberg Tc, which is more than many papers do.

The soft spots are real. At 10 GPa the system is deep in strong coupling: lambda = 4.50, and about 60% of that comes from soft modes at 110–540 cm-1. The authors themselves note phonon softening at W with A1 symmetry. Everything rests on the harmonic approximation, and in this regime anharmonicity can renormalize those soft modes substantially, changing both the dynamic stability and alpha^2F. No anharmonic validation (SSCHA, MD) is reported. On top of that, the two Tc estimates at 10 GPa differ by 52 K (129 vs 181 K), and the numerical Eliashberg solution is not specified—no convergence tests, no solver details, no mu* sensitivity. With mu* fixed at 0.10 and lambda this large, the result is very sensitive to both the treatment and mu*. So the 181 K headline number is not established. The qualitative claim that Be incorporation stabilizes a superconducting hydride near 10 GPa is more robust than the exact Tc.

Minor point: the abstract says 'proving'—it's a prediction, not a proof. Not a big deal.

Bottom line: a competent, standard prediction paper with an interesting low-pressure candidate. The exact Tc and even the stability at 10 GPa need anharmonic checks and full numerical details. I'd send it to a referee—a competent one can judge whether the anharmonic concern is fatal or fixable—but I wouldn't bet on 181 K surviving. The convex hull and the precompression story are worth citing regardless.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an ab initio structure search of the Ac–Be–H phase diagram at 200 GPa, identifies three thermodynamically stable phases (P1 AcBe2H10, Pmmn AcBeH8, Cmcm AcBe2H14) and several metastable phases, and calculates electronic structure, phonons, and electron–phonon coupling for the superconducting candidates. The central claim is that fcc AcBeH8 is dynamically stable down to 10 GPa and has Tc = 181 K (Table I), based on an Eliashberg solution with λ = 4.50, ωlog = 433 K, and μ* = 0.10; other phases are predicted to superconduct at 78–165 K at 200–300 GPa. The paper attributes the low-pressure stability and strong coupling to Be–H bonding and to soft modes in the 110–540 cm−1 range.

Significance. If confirmed, the low-pressure claim is significant: a phonon-mediated Tc of 181 K at 10 GPa would be a major step toward practical hydride superconductors and would strengthen the Be–H 'chemical precompression' strategy. The workflow is standard and transparent in its main steps: CALYPSO structure searches, VASP relaxations, Quantum ESPRESSO linear-response phonons and EPC, and Allen–Dynes/Eliashberg Tc estimates with a fixed μ*. The authors also honestly discuss the metastability of fcc AcBeH8 and the methodological difference from Ref. [56]. The weakness is that the headline number is not yet robust: the harmonic approximation is unvalidated at λ = 4.5, and the numerical Eliashberg solution is under-specified.

major comments (4)

[Results and Discussion, Table I, Fig. 4(d)] The central claim that fcc AcBeH8 is dynamically stable at 10 GPa with Tc = 181 K rests entirely on harmonic phonon calculations. At 10 GPa λ = 4.50 and roughly 60% of λ comes from soft modes at 110–540 cm−1, and the text itself notes phonon softening at the W point. In this extreme strong-coupling regime anharmonicity can renormalize the soft-mode frequencies and reshape α2F(ω), which would change both the dynamic stability and the Tc obtained from Eq. (4). No anharmonic calculation (SSCHA, molecular dynamics, or phonon–phonon coupling) is reported, so the stress-test concern about anharmonicity lands directly on the central result.
[Computational details, Eq. (4), Table I] The numerical Eliashberg solution behind the 181 K value is under-specified. The paper states only that the Eliashberg equations were solved numerically; it does not report whether the solution is isotropic or anisotropic, the Matsubara-frequency cutoff, the treatment of the Coulomb pseudopotential, or convergence criteria. The 52 K gap between the Allen–Dynes estimate (129 K) and the Eliashberg estimate (181 K) at λ = 4.5 shows that the strong-coupling corrections are large, so the missing numerical details prevent the reader from assessing the reliability of the headline Tc.
[Computational details, after Eq. (1)] No sensitivity analysis for μ* is given. The value μ* = 0.10 is imposed rather than fitted, which is appropriate and avoids circularity, but Tc in strong coupling can depend strongly on this single free parameter. A variation such as μ* = 0.08–0.13 should be reported to show that the 181 K value is not an artifact of the chosen pseudopotential parameter.
[Results and Discussion, Fig. 5] The treatment of AcBe2H12 is internally inconsistent. The text states that AcBe2H12 is not dynamically stable at 200 GPa, yet it later reports λ = 0.9 and Tc = 78 K for AcBe2H12 at 200 GPa and includes it in Fig. 5. This must be resolved because the abstract's statement that all identified phases are superconductors is otherwise not supported for this compound.

minor comments (4)

[Results and Discussion, structural description] The phrase 'AcBe2H14 has is also orthorhombic' contains a grammatical error and should be rewritten.
[Computational details, reference [46]] Reference [46] is cited for Monkhorst–Pack k-point meshes, but the listed work by Tang, Sanville, Henkelman is not the Monkhorst–Pack reference; the citation should be corrected.
[Results and Discussion, DOS discussion] The sentence stating that the partial DOS of H at EF for some metastable structures 'amounts to less than ∼1 eV−1' appears inconsistent with the earlier DOS values of about 0.1–0.3 eV−1 for other phases; the value or units should be checked.
[Results and Discussion, AcBeH10] The text says fcc AcBeH10 is '15 meV/atom energetically higher than the lowest enthalpy phase P21', but the P21 structure is not otherwise introduced; a brief description or reference would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Tc and stability claims are genuine first-principles outputs; mu* is imposed, not fitted, and self-citations are methodological only.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. Crystal structures are obtained from unbiased particle-swarm searches (CALYPSO), enthalpies from DFT relaxation, dynamical stability from linear-response phonon calculations, and superconductivity from the Eliashberg spectral function via Allen-Dynes/McMillan formulas and numerical Eliashberg equations. The key parameter mu* = 0.10 is stated as the 'typical value' and is imposed, not fitted to reproduce any target Tc; the reported lambda, omega_log, and Tc values are outputs of the calculation. The claim that fcc AcBeH8 is dynamically stable down to 10 GPa is based on computed phonon dispersions, and the 181 K Tc is the result of inserting the computed alpha^2F(omega) into the Eliashberg treatment. No equation in the paper defines a prediction in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness or existence theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to force the chosen structures. The self-citations (e.g., Refs. 27, 39, 43) are used only to validate the methodology by reference to experimentally confirmed hydride predictions; they are not load-bearing for the Ac-Be-H results. The absence of anharmonic validation is a legitimate scientific concern about the robustness of the harmonic phonon approximation at lambda = 4.50, but it is a correctness/validity risk, not circular reasoning. The paper also explicitly compares with an independent prior study (Ref. 56) and explains the methodological difference in Tc estimates, which further supports that the derivation is not internally recycled.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a standard first-principles computational prediction. It therefore rests on the accuracy of PBE-DFT, the harmonic approximation, the chosen mu* value, and the completeness of the structure search. These are domain assumptions, not fitted parameters or invented entities.

free parameters (1)

Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.10
Chosen by hand as a standard value, not fitted to data. The headline Eliashberg Tc of 181 K is computed with this value, and Tc would change if mu* varied.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The PBE-GGA exchange-correlation functional accurately describes the energetics, phonons, and electron-phonon coupling of Ac-Be-H compounds at 10 to 300 GPa.
Used for all relaxations and EPC calculations; no validation against experiment or higher-level theory is provided (Computational Details).
domain assumption Harmonic lattice dynamics is valid at all pressures studied, including 10 GPa where the EPC constant reaches lambda = 4.5.
The paper computes phonons in the harmonic approximation and does not test anharmonicity, although soft hydrogen modes dominate lambda at 10 GPa (Fig. 4(d), Table I).
domain assumption The Coulomb pseudopotential mu* = 0.10 is the correct screening parameter for these hydrides.
Chosen as a standard value; Tc is sensitive to it, and no sensitivity analysis is reported (Table I).
domain assumption CALYPSO structure searches at 200 GPa are complete enough that no lower-enthalpy phase at 10 GPa was missed.
Structure prediction was performed only at 200 GPa; low-pressure stability of fcc AcBeH8 was checked by relaxing that structure, not by a new search at 10 GPa (Computational Details).
standard math The Allen-Dynes and Eliashberg strong-coupling formalism correctly converts the calculated alpha2F(omega) into Tc.
Standard theory for phonon-mediated superconductors; the accuracy at lambda = 4.5 is not demonstrated here (Eqs. 1 to 6).

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in ternary actinium beryllium hydrides at low pressure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VJBSA432

@misc{pith2026241119028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Prediction of high-Tc superconductivity in ternary actinium beryllium hydrides at low pressure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VJBSA432}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.19028}
}

read the original abstract

Hydrogen-rich superconductors are promising candidates to achieve room-temperature superconductivity. However, the extreme pressures needed to stabilize these structures significantly limit their practical applications. An effective strategy to reduce the external pressure is to add a light element M that binds with H to form MHx units, acting as a chemical precompressor. We exemplify this idea by performing ab initio calculations of the Ac-Be-H phase diagram, proving that the metallization pressure of Ac-H binaries, for which critical temperatures as high as 200 K were predicted at 200 GPa, can be significantly reduced via beryllium incorporation. We identify three thermodynamically stable (AcBe2H10, AcBeH8, and AcBe2H14) and four metastable compounds (fcc AcBeH8, AcBeH10, AcBeH12 and AcBe2H16). All of them are superconductors. In particular, fcc AcBeH8 remains dynamically stable down to 10 GPa, where it exhibits a superconducting transition temperature Tc of 181 K. The Be-H bonds are responsible for the exceptional properties of these ternary compounds and allow them to remain dynamically stable close to ambient pressure. Our results suggest that high-Tc superconductivity in hydrides is achievable at low pressure and may stimulate experimental synthesis of ternary hydrides.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.19028 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Structural configuration. The stable (a)–(c) and metastable structures (d)–(f) of Ac–Be–H compounds. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Phonon dispersion and electron-phonon coupling (EPC) coefficient of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Electronic and superconductivity properties of AcBeH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Superconducting-transition temperature. Logarithmic av [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

[56]

Z. Wan, T. Yang, W. Xu, and R. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01903 (2022)

work page Pith review arXiv 2022
[1]

Y . Li, J. Hao, H. Liu, Y . Li, and Y . Ma, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174712 (2014)

work page 2014
[2]

D. Duan, Y . Liu, F. Tian, D. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (2014)

work page 2014
[3]

Drozdov, M

A. Drozdov, M. Eremets, I. Troyan, V . Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, Nature 525, 73 (2015)

work page 2015
[4]

H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoffmann, N. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 6990 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Kostrzewa, K

M. Kostrzewa, K. Szcze ¸´sniak, A. Durajski, and R. Szcze ¸´sniak, Sci. Rep. 10, 1 (2020)

work page 2020
[6]

F. Peng, Y . Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017)

2017
[7]

Drozdov, P

A. Drozdov, P. Kong, V . Minkov, S. Besedin, M. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. Balakirev, D. Graf, V . Prakapenka, et al., Nature 569, 528 (2019)

work page 2019

Show all 61 references

[8]

Somayazulu, M

M. Somayazulu, M. Ahart, A. K. Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y . Meng, V . V . Struzhkin, and R. J. Hemley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 027001 (2019)

2019
[9]

H. Wang, S. T. John, K. Tanaka, T. Iitaka, and Y . Ma, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 6463 (2012)

2012
[10]

L. Ma, K. Wang, Y . Xie, X. Yang, Y . Wang, M. Zhou, H. Liu, X. Yu, Y . Zhao, H. Wang,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 167001 (2022)

2022
[11]

Z. Li, X. He, C. Zhang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, Y . Jia, S. Feng, K. Lu, J. Zhao, J. Zhang,et al., Nat. Commun. 13, 2863 (2022)

2022
[12]

Y . Li, J. Hao, H. Liu, S. T. John, Y . Wang, and Y . Ma, Sci. Rep. 5, 1 (2015)

2015
[13]

P. Kong, V . S. Minkov, M. A. Kuzovnikov, A. P. Drozdov, S. P. Besedin, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, V . B. Prakapenka, S. Chariton, et al., Nat. Commun. 12, 5075 (2021)

2021
[14]

I. A. Troyan, D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V . M. Pudalov, A. G. Ivanova, V . B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, A. G. Gavriliuk, et al., Adv. Mater. 33, 2006832 (2021)

2021
[15]

Snider, N

E. Snider, N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. McBride, X. Wang, N. Meyers, K. V . Lawler, E. Zurek, A. Salamat, and R. P. Dias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 117003 (2021)

2021
[16]

Shimizu, H

K. Shimizu, H. Ishikawa, D. Takao, T. Yagi, and K. Amaya, Nature 419, 597 (2002)

2002
[17]

N. Wang, P. Shan, K. Chen, J. Sun, P. Yang, X. Ma, B. Wang, X. Yu, S. Zhang, G. Chen, et al., Supercond. Sci. Technol. 34, 034006 (2021)

2021
[18]

Dietrich, W

M. Dietrich, W. Gey, H. Rietschel, and C. Satterthwaite, Solid State Commun. 15, 941 (1974)

1974
[19]

Schirber and C

J. Schirber and C. Northrup Jr, Phys. Rev. B 10, 3818 (1974)

1974
[20]

Y . Sun, J. Lv, Y . Xie, H. Liu, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 097001 (2019)

2019
[21]

P. Song, Z. Hou, K. Nakano, K. Hongo, and R. Maezono, Mater. Today Phys. 28, 100873 (2022)

2022
[22]

D. V . Semenok, I. A. Troyan, A. G. Ivanova, A. G. Kvashnin, I. A. Kruglov, M. Hanfland, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, K. S. Pervakov, I. S. Lyubutin, et al. , Mater. Today 48, 18 (2021)

2021
[23]

Zhang, T

Z. Zhang, T. Cui, M. J. Hutcheon, A. M. Shipley, H. Song, M. Du, V . Z. Kresin, D. Duan, C. J. Pickard, and Y . Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 047001 (2022)

2022
[24]

J. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, P. Zhang, K. Shimizu, B. Zou, H. Liu, M. Zhou, G. Liu, H. Wang, and Y . Ma, Nat. Commun. 13, 5952 (2022)

2022
[25]

W. Chen, X. Huang, D. V . Semenok, S. Chen, K. Zhang, A. R. Oganov, and T. Cui, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.14353 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[26]

D. V . Semenok, I. A. Troyan, A. V . Sadakov, D. Zhou, M. Galasso, A. G. Kvashnin, A. G. Ivanova, I. A. Kruglov, A. A. Bykov, K. Y . Terent’ev,et al., Adv. Mater. 34, 2204038 (2022)

2022
[27]

W. Cui, T. Bi, J. Shi, Y . Li, H. Liu, E. Zurek, and R. J. Hemley, Phys. Rev. B 101, 134504 (2020)

2020
[28]

Y . Sun, Y . Tian, B. Jiang, X. Li, H. Li, T. Iitaka, X. Zhong, and Y . Xie, Phys. Rev. B101, 174102 (2020)

2020
[29]

Liang, A

X. Liang, A. Bergara, X. Wei, X. Song, L. Wang, R. Sun, H. Liu, R. J. Hemley, L. Wang, G. Gao, et al. , Phys. Rev. B 104, 134501 (2021)

2021
[30]

Roman, B

L. Roman, B. Lilia, H. Christoph, et al., npj Comput. Mater. 8 (2022)

2022
[31]

S. Li, H. Wang, W. Sun, C. Lu, and F. Peng, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224107 (2022)

2022
[32]

Gao, X.-W

M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-Y . Lu, and T. Xiang, Phys. Rev. B104, L100504 (2021)

2021
[33]

D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, I. A. Kruglov, and A. R. Oganov, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1920 (2018)

2018
[34]

S. Yu, Q. Zeng, A. R. Oganov, C. Hu, G. Frapper, and L. Zhang, AIP Adv. 4, 107118 (2014)

2014
[35]

Y . Wang, J. Lv, L. Zhu, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. B 82, 094116 (2010)

2010
[36]

Y . Wang, J. Lv, L. Zhu, and Y . Ma, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2063 (2012)

2012
[37]

B. Gao, P. Gao, S. Lu, J. Lv, Y . Wang, and Y . Ma, Sci. Bull.64, 301 (2019)

2019
[38]

X. Shao, J. Lv, P. Liu, S. Shao, P. Gao, H. Liu, Y . Wang, and Y . Ma, J. Chem. Phys.156, 014105 (2022)

2022
[39]

Cui and Y

W. Cui and Y . Li, Chin. Phys. B28, 107104 (2019)

2019
[40]

J. A. Flores-Livas, L. Boeri, A. Sanna, G. Profeta, R. Arita, and M. Eremets, Phys. Rep. 856, 1 (2020)

2020
[41]

Zurek and T

E. Zurek and T. Bi, J. Chem. Phys. 150, 050901 (2019)

2019
[42]

J. Ma, J. Kuang, W. Cui, J. Chen, K. Gao, J. Hao, J. Shi, and Y . Li, Chin. Phys. Lett.38, 027401 (2021)

2021
[43]

J. Shi, W. Cui, J. Hao, M. Xu, X. Wang, and Y . Li, Nat. Com- mun. 11, 1 (2020). 8

2020
[44]

Kresse and J

G. Kresse and J. Furthm ¨uller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

1996
[45]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

1996
[46]

W. Tang, E. Sanville, and G. Henkelman, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 084204 (2009)

2009
[47]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

2009
[48]

Kresse and D

G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

1999
[49]

See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by pub- lisher]. It contains the computational details of EPC, 3D convex hull, structural information, average charge transfer in one unit cell of Ac-Be-H compounds; the phonon-dispersion curves, PHDOS, α2F (ω), Eliashberg spe...
[50]

P. B. Allen and R. Dynes, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

1975
[51]

H. Xie, Y . Yao, X. Feng, D. Duan, H. Song, Z. Zhang, S. Jiang, S. A. Redfern, V . Z. Kresin, C. J. Pickard,et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 217001 (2020)

2020
[52]

M. Du, H. Song, Z. Zhang, D. Duan, and T. Cui, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11043 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[53]

Y . Sun, S. Sun, X. Zhong, and H. Liu, J. Phys.: Condens. Mat- ter 34, 505404 (2022)

2022
[54]

Y . Hou, B. Li, Y . Bai, X. Hao, Y . Yang, F. Chi, S. Liu, J. Cheng, and Z. Shi, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 34, 505403 (2022)

2022
[55]

Jiang, Z

Q. Jiang, Z. Zhang, H. Song, Y . Ma, Y . Sun, M. Miao, T. Cui, and D. Duan, Fundam. Res. (2022)

2022
[57]

W. Chen, D. V . Semenok, X. Huang, H. Shu, X. Li, D. Duan, T. Cui, and A. R. Oganov, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 117001 (2021)

2021
[58]

N. P. Salke, M. M. Davari Esfahani, Y . Zhang, I. A. Kruglov, J. Zhou, Y . Wang, E. Greenberg, V . B. Prakapenka, J. Liu, A. R. Oganov, et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 4453 (2019)

2019
[59]

Di Cataldo, C

S. Di Cataldo, C. Heil, W. von der Linden, and L. Boeri, Phys. Rev. B 104, L020511 (2021)

2021
[60]

Simon, Angew

A. Simon, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 36, 1788 (1997)

1997
[61]

Eliashberg, Sov

G. Eliashberg, Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696 (1960)

1960

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [56]

Z. Wan, T. Yang, W. Xu, and R. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01903 (2022)

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

[2] [1]

Y . Li, J. Hao, H. Liu, Y . Li, and Y . Ma, J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174712 (2014)

work page 2014

[3] [2]

D. Duan, Y . Liu, F. Tian, D. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Sci. Rep. 4, 1 (2014)

work page 2014

[4] [3]

Drozdov, M

A. Drozdov, M. Eremets, I. Troyan, V . Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, Nature 525, 73 (2015)

work page 2015

[5] [4]

H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoffmann, N. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 6990 (2017)

work page 2017

[6] [5]

Kostrzewa, K

M. Kostrzewa, K. Szcze ¸´sniak, A. Durajski, and R. Szcze ¸´sniak, Sci. Rep. 10, 1 (2020)

work page 2020

[7] [6]

F. Peng, Y . Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y . Ma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017)

2017

[8] [7]

Drozdov, P

A. Drozdov, P. Kong, V . Minkov, S. Besedin, M. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. Balakirev, D. Graf, V . Prakapenka, et al., Nature 569, 528 (2019)

work page 2019