Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-Text Rationales

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 2 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2305.07095.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2305.07095 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 2 of 2 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 2 of 2 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T20:57:42.060515Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-07T20:57:42.360787Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 46fa3b1a-65df-4bd9-8a6f-9067b8d63981 · inbound

CoT-Valve: Length-Compressible Chain-of-Thought Tuning cites this paper.

CoT-Valve: Length-Compressible Chain-of-Thought Tuning Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-Text Rationales

Reference 20

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-07T20:57:42.367345Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-07T20:57:42.060515Z digest=sha256:d14939efd0b7ec8a7a50431b7ad957ea1dfe8f2c41123698063afb208741cb20

Observation 71f6839e-b693-4227-8801-8a1b6fb6d790 · inbound

Rethinking Human Preference Evaluation of LLM Rationales cites this paper.

Rethinking Human Preference Evaluation of LLM Rationales Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-Text Rationales

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T17:15:27.875563Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T17:15:27.875563Z digest=sha256:20ebd4df4f6e4bad052d6fbeeb881b509b0973d82dcd01c5918d75fcf9926230