Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The Warp Drive: Superluminal Travel within General Relativity

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Alcubierre warp drive can be sourced by ordinary fluids, and the resulting solutions do not force negative energy densities or energy-condition violations.

desk verdict A careful thesis compilation with a load-bearing overclaim: the solved shift vectors are not Alcubierre bubble functions. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20348 v1 pith:VMCQIWVM submitted 2025-08-28 gr-qc

Osvaldo L. Santos-Pereira This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc
keywords warpdriveAlcubierremetricnegativeenergydensityconditionsBurgersequationshockwavesperfectfluidanisotropic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This thesis argues that the Alcubierre warp drive does not, by itself, force a violation of the classical energy conditions: the choice of matter source matters. Coupling the warp-drive metric to dust, perfect fluid, anisotropic fluid, charged dust, and a perfect fluid with a cosmological constant yields Einstein-equation solutions in which the matter density can be positive and the energy conditions can hold for the relevant observers. The recurring mathematical link is a Burgers-type equation for the shift vector, which the paper reads as a sign that warp-bubble formation may be a shock-wave phenomenon. If the claim holds, the practical question shifts from requiring exotic negative energy to finding which realistic fluid sources and junction conditions can build the required bubble.

What carries the argument

The central object is the shift vector $\beta(t,x^i)$ in the ADM-decomposed Alcubierre metric; the shift vector is the function that encodes the velocity and shape of the warp bubble. The argument works by solving the Einstein equations for $\beta$ under the ansatz that it depends on time and one spatial coordinate ($x$, $y$, or $z$), and by imposing linear combinations of the field equations that eliminate most metric derivatives. The load-bearing identity is the Burgers-type equation $\partial\beta/\partial t + \frac{1}{2}\partial(\beta^2)/\partial x = h(t)$ with $h$ a time-only source term; it acts as the bridge between the geometric side and the matter source, producing vacuum solutions that connect warp-drive geometry to shock waves.

What would settle it

Take any of the derived shift vectors, say $\beta(t,x)$ satisfying $\partial\beta/\partial t + \frac{1}{2}\partial(\beta^2)/\partial x = h(t)$, and check whether it can be written as $\beta=-v_s(t)f(r_s)$ with $f$ a step-like function of the distance to a bubble center. If no choice of $v_s$ and $f$ reproduces it, the spacetime contains no Alcubierre-type warp bubble, and the claimed connection to superluminal travel fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The thesis's central claim is that the Alcubierre warp-drive metric can be coupled to ordinary fluid sources and that the resulting solutions show warp speeds do not always require negative mass-energy density or violation of the energy conditions. For dust the field equations force $\mu=0$ and reduce the geometry to a vacuum described by the Burgers-type equation $\partial\beta/\partial t + \frac{1}{2}\partial(\beta^2)/\partial x = h(t)$, which the paper interprets as a shock-wave mechanism for bubble formation. For a perfect fluid the equation of state becomes $p=3\mu$, with real-valued shift vectors requiring negative $\mu$ and energy conditions satisfiable when $\mu$ is positive at the price of a complex shift vector. Adding a cosmological constant breaks that price for cases 1a and 2a, allowing positive matter density with a real shift vector. The charged-dust analysis finds energy conditions that can hold for positive or negative matter density depending on electromagnetic field strengths.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the derived shift-vector solutions are warp drives even though none of them reproduces the bubble-shaped function $f(r_s)$ of Eq. (2.11) that separates a localized bubble interior from flat spacetime; if a warp drive must have such a bubble shape, the claim that these are warp-drive solutions collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the solutions are accepted as warp-drive spacetimes, negative mass-energy density is not a strict precondition for superluminal warp speeds; ordinary fluid sources can, in principle, drive them.
  • The Burgers-type equation links warp-bubble formation to shock-wave dynamics, suggesting the bubble wall may be a discontinuity or junction between flat regions rather than a smooth localized bump.
  • With a cosmological constant, positive matter density and a real-valued shift vector can coexist for cases 1a and 2a, so energy-condition theorems that assume the original Alcubierre form do not apply to the whole class of warp-drive metrics.
  • For the perfect-fluid cases 1b and 2b, the solution reduces to the dust vacuum solution, meaning shock-wave warp solutions are vacuum solutions and automatically satisfy all energy conditions.
  • The charged-dust analysis implies superluminal regimes are possible even with weak electromagnetic fields, with the null energy condition the only one requiring positive matter density.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: because the derived shift vectors depend on a single spatial coordinate, the spacetimes may represent planar shock-sheet solutions rather than localized spherical bubbles; testing this requires checking whether any solution can be written as $\beta=-v_s(t)f(r_s)$ with a bubble-regulating function.
  • Editorial inference: if the Burgers-type equation is taken at face value, its finite-time gradient blowup predicts the formation of discontinuities or caustics; numerical-relativity simulations of these solutions could look for such shock formation and compare it to bubble-wall thickness.
  • Editorial inference: the charged-dust chapter derives energy-condition bounds and an equation of state but presents no explicit solution of the field equations, so that source supports the thesis only indirectly.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's conclusion suggests matching the planar vacuum solution to an outer flat spacetime via junction conditions; carrying out such a matching would either produce a genuine localized bubble or force the bubble-regulating function back into the equations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The thesis (arXiv:2508.20348) claims to present new exact solutions of the Einstein equations for the Alcubierre warp-drive metric with fluid sources: dust, perfect fluid, anisotropic fluid, charged dust, and perfect fluid with cosmological constant. It argues that, contrary to the usual conclusion, negative mass-energy density is not a strict precondition for warp drive, and it connects some vacuum solutions to the inviscid Burgers equation. The manuscript is a doctoral thesis containing largely re-derived algebraic manipulations, with Sage code in the appendix. The central technical result is that, under the metric of Eq. (3.1), the condition G_{23}=0 forces the shift vector to depend on only one spatial coordinate, and the vacuum condition leads to a Burgers-type equation. Energy conditions are then evaluated for the resulting families of shift vectors.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, it would challenge a long-standing result that warp-drive spacetimes of the Alcubierre type necessarily violate classical energy conditions. The thesis has some genuine strengths: the algebraic derivations are mostly explicit, the Burgers-type equation does emerge from the vacuum condition in Sec. 4.1, the energy-condition calculations are carried out carefully for the families of shift vectors considered, and the Appendix provides Sage code that would allow independent verification of the tensor components. However, the central claim is load-bearing and fails: the solutions obtained are not Alcubierre warp-bubble solutions. The shift vectors that are actually solved are β=β(t,y), β=β(t,z), or β=β(t,x), none of which has the required form β=−v_s(t)f(r_s) of Eq. (2.11). These spacetimes have no localized bubble, no expansion/contraction of the spatial foliation, and are generally not asymptotically flat. The energy-condition analysis therefore concerns a broader class of shift metrics, not the warp drive that the paper claims to study.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5.1, Eqs. (5.13) and (5.26)] The perfect-fluid solutions are β(t,y)=±√(−32πμ)y+g(t) and β(t,z)=±√(−32πμ)z+w(t). These are not Alcubierre warp-bubble shift vectors. The Alcubierre form requires β=−v_s(t)f(r_s), with f(r_s) the localised regulating function of Eq. (2.11), which must vanish outside a finite bubble radius. The linear functions obtained here grow without bound in y or z, are not asymptotically flat, and give zero expansion scalar θ=−∂β/∂x=0. The energy-condition results in Sec. 5.2 therefore do not apply to the warp drive spacetimes the paper claims to analyse.
  2. [Sec. 6.1, Cases 1a and 2a] The anisotropic-fluid solutions in Eqs. (6.25) and (6.44) again determine β as a function of (t,y) or (t,z), with no explicit dependence on r_s and no bubble-wall profile. The resulting spacetimes cannot be interpreted as warp bubbles with a superluminal passenger inside a localised warped region. The energy-condition inequalities derived in Sec. 6.2, such as the bounds on β in Eq. (6.66), are therefore conditions on the anisotropic fluid in a non-bubble spacetime, not on a warp drive.
  3. [Sec. 5.4 and Conclusion] The paper's own discussion undermines its central claim. For positive matter density μ, cases 1a and 2a require a complex-valued shift vector β, as stated in Sec. 5.4. The text explicitly says: 'It seems reasonable to presume that the warp bubble requires a perfect fluid with negative mass-energy density and β as a real function.' This admission directly contradicts the abstract and conclusion's claim that the solutions show negative mass-energy density is not a strict precondition for warp speeds. A complex shift vector has no obvious physical interpretation for a warp bubble.
  4. [Sec. 7.5] The charged-dust chapter does not display a single solution of the Einstein equations. Sec. 7.5 states: 'no solutions to the Einstein equations are displayed in this work for the charged dust warp drive configuration.' The chapter presents inequalities, a sketch of equations, and two energy-momentum tensor forms, but no actual solution. Nevertheless, the abstract and conclusion cite charged dust among the sources for which 'warp speeds' are generated. This is not supported by the content of the chapter.
  5. [Sec. 8.1 and Table 8] The cosmological-constant solutions are internally inconsistent in their reported coefficients. Eq. (8.3) gives Λ = (3/4)(μ−p/3), while Table 8 lists Λ = 6π(μ−p/3). Similarly, Eq. (8.4) gives (∂β/∂y)^2 = 4(Λ−μ), while Table 8 writes (∂β/∂y)^2 = 4(Λ−8πμ). These are not equivalent in the stated natural units with κ=8π. Moreover, the resulting β=β(t,y) or β=β(t,z) is again not a bubble function, and the consistency condition Λ=(3μ−p)/2 in Eq. (8.22) does not restore the required r_s dependence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 4.1] The interpretation of the Burgers-type solutions β=β(t,x) as 'warp bubbles' is not justified. A shock wave in β along x does not by itself create the expanding-behind/contracting-in-front geometry of the Alcubierre bubble, since the expansion scalar θ=−∂β/∂x vanishes for these solutions. The thesis should either construct an explicit f(r_s) profile or refrain from calling these vacuum solutions warp bubbles.
  2. [Eq. (3.3)] Equation (3.3) contains an apparent typographical error: the second squared term is written as '(∂β/∂z)^2' but the preceding term appears as '∂β/∂(∂β/∂z)'? The equation as printed has a fragment '∂β/∂' with a missing variable in the derivative.
  3. [Sec. 1.1] In the sentence 'Lating bold letters represent vectors and operators', 'Lating' should read 'Latin'.
  4. [Table 3] In Table 3, Case 2a reports '∂β/∂z = ±√(±96πμ)' whereas the text in Eq. (5.25) gives '∂β/∂z = ±√(−32πμ)'. The discrepancy should be resolved.
  5. [Sec. 7.4, Eq. (7.95)] Equation (7.95) states Λ = 4πE_1^2, but earlier equations in the same section, such as Eq. (7.67), contain no 8π or 4π factors on the left-hand side of the Einstein equations. The relation between Λ and the electromagnetic energy density should be re-derived consistently with the convention κ=8π set in Sec. 1.1.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No load-bearing circularity; the derivations are self-contained, though self-citation and a definitional broadening of the warp-drive class lower confidence.

full rationale

The thesis's derivation chain is largely self-contained rather than circular. It starts from the 3+1/Alcubierre-type metric (Eq. 3.1), computes the Einstein tensor components (Eqs. 3.2-3.11), imposes Einstein equations with the chosen fluid sources, and solves for the shift vector beta. The Burgers-type equation (e.g., Eq. 4.12) is derived from the field equations and integration, not inserted as an input or fitted to data. The energy-condition results are computed from the energy-momentum tensor obtained after solving the field equations, so they are not assumed in order to be concluded. The repeated self-citations to Refs. [1-5] are disclosed, and the corresponding results are re-derived in Chapters 4-8 rather than imported as unproved premises; the thesis also cites independent reproduction by Abellán, Bolivar, and Vasilev. The main weakness is a scope/validity issue rather than circularity: the solved shift vectors have the form beta(t,x), beta(t,y), or beta(t,z), and none is shown to reproduce Alcubierre's bubble-regulating function f(r_s) of Eq. (2.11). The thesis itself concedes in Sec. 8.4 that 'the expansion volume of the warp bubble does not follow the behavior proposed by Alcubierre.' This means the conclusions may not apply to the original Alcubierre warp bubble, but the derivation does not presuppose that conclusion, so this is not a circular reduction. The score of 2 reflects the disclosed self-citation pattern and the definitional looseness in calling these solutions 'warp drive' solutions, not a load-bearing circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivations rest on the standard Einstein and ADM formalism, plus the assumed fluid energy-momentum tensors. The anisotropic fluid ansatz is ad hoc to the paper. No new particles or fields are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • h(t)
    Arbitrary function of time in the Burgers-type equation (Eq. 4.12), determined by boundary conditions, not fixed by the theory.
  • integration functions g(t) and w(t)
    Arbitrary integration functions for the shift vector in perfect fluid cases 1a and 2a (Eqs. 5.13 and 5.26).
  • anisotropic fluid pressures A, B, C, D, p
    Free parameters of the ad hoc anisotropic energy-momentum tensor ansatz (Eq. 3.23), constrained by energy conditions but not fitted to data.
  • electromagnetic field components E1, B2, B3
    Chosen configuration for the charged dust analysis (Sec 7.3), not derived from the equations.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Einstein field equations G_mu_nu + Lambda g_mu_nu = 8 pi T_mu_nu are the governing equations.
    Invoked in Eq.(1.3) and used throughout.
  • standard math ADM 3+1 decomposition with alpha=1 and gamma_ij=delta_ij is a valid representation of spacetime.
    Used to define the warp drive metric in Eq.(2.1) and Eq.(3.1).
  • domain assumption The energy-momentum tensors for dust, perfect fluid, and charged dust describe physically relevant matter.
    Assumed in chapters 4-7 without derivation from a Lagrangian.
  • ad hoc to paper The anisotropic fluid energy-momentum tensor ansatz (Eq. 3.23) is a valid matter source.
    Introduced by the author as a parametrization that reduces to a perfect fluid; no independent physical justification is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Warp Drive: Superluminal Travel within General Relativity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMCQIWVM

@misc{pith2026250820348,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Warp Drive: Superluminal Travel within General Relativity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMCQIWVM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20348}
}
read the original abstract

In 1994, Miguel Alcubierre proposed that the well-known special relativistic limitation that particles cannot travel with velocities higher than light speed can be bypassed when such trips are considered globally within specific general relativistic frameworks, using a warped region of spacetime in the shape of a bubble that transports particles with mass traveling through spacetime with superluminal speed. Although initial results indicated this scenario as nonphysical, since it would seem to require negative mass-energy density, recent theoretical analyses suggest that such a nonphysical situation may not always be true. This thesis presents newfound solutions for the Einstein field equations, considering the Alcubierre warp drive spacetime metrics. The central premise is to study the fluid matter as the gravity source, rather than the more common vacuum or negative energy sources, to explore the potential for generating superluminal velocities, or \textit{warp speeds}, through a warped region in the spacetime. Such solutions have various matter-energy sources: dust particles, perfect fluid, quasi-perfect fluid with anisotropic pressures, charged dust, and a perfect fluid within a cosmological constant spacetime. A connection between some of these solutions featuring shock waves described by a Burgers-type equation with a term on the right-hand side of the equation purely dependent on time is also shown. This could mean warp drives are closely related to vacuum energy and possibly have topological effects such as shock waves.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20348 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the 3+1 decomposition of spacetime with hyper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the 3+1 decomposition of spacetime with the world [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Schematic of 4-vector decomposition on the ADM formalism. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows a schematic representation of the warp bubble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Light cones in warp drive spacetime being tilted by the gravitational interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: is schematic for this effective superluminal method of propulsion. A particle with mass is initially at rest with synchronized watches with another observer at the same spatial point. If at t = 0, the observer at rest emitted a photon, and the spaceship departed from t…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sequence of events on Alcubierre superluminal travel thought experiment. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p119_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic representation of the thought experiment proposed by Alcubierre. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p121_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shift vector sign reversal in the Alcubierre warp drive spacetime geometry and nonlinear Burgers-type dynamics

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The vacuum Einstein equations of the Alcubierre metric with a time- and x-dependent shift vector are algebraically rearranged into a Burgers and a heat equation using an arbitrary diffusivity parameter and source split.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    O. L. Santos-Pereira, E. M. C. Abreu, and M. B. Ribeiro. Dust content content solutions for the alcubierre warp drive spacetime.Eur. Phys. J. C, 80(8):786, aug

    work page

  2. [2]

    O. L. Santos-Pereira, E. M. C. Abreu, and M. B. Ribeiro. Fluid dynamics in the warp drive spacetime geometry.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(2):133, jan 2021. arXiv: gr-qc/2101.11467, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08921-3

    work page arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    O. L. Santos-Pereira, E. M. C. Abreu, and M. B. Ribeiro. Charged dust solutions for the warp drive spacetime.Gen. Relat. Gravit., 53(2):23, feb 2021.arXiv:gr-qc/ 2102.05119, doi:10.1007/s10714-021-02799-y

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    O. L. Santos-Pereira, E. M. C. Abreu, and M. B. Ribeiro. Perfect fluid warp drive solutions with the cosmological constant.Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 136(9):902, aug 2021. arXiv:gr-qc/2108.10960, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01899-7

    work page Pith review arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    O. L. Santos-Pereira, E. M. C. Abreu, and M. B. Ribeiro.Warp drive dynamic solutions considering different fluid sources. World Scientific, 2023. doi:10.1142/ 9789811269776_0066

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Alcubierre

    M. Alcubierre. The warp drive: hyper-fast travel within general relativity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(5):L73–L77, may 1994. arXiv:gr-qc/0009013, doi:10. 1088/0264-9381/11/5/001

    arXiv 1994

  7. [7]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C.W. Misner. Dynamical structure and definition of en- ergyingeneralrelativity. Phys. Rev., 116:1322–1330, Dec1959. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.116.1322, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.116.1322

    doi:10.1103/physrev.116.1322

  8. [8]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C.W. Misner. The dynamics of general relativity.Gen. Rel. Grav., 40:1997–2027, 1962. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10. 1007/s10714-008-0661-1, arXiv:gr-qc/0405109, doi:s10714-008-0661-1

    arXiv 1997

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    L. H. Ford and T. A. Roman. Quantum field theory constrains traversable wormhole geometries. Phys. Rev. D , 53(TUTP-95-4):5496–5507, May 1996. URL:https:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5496, arXiv:gr-qc/9510071, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.53.5496

    1996 arXiv

  2. [10]

    M. J. Pfenning and L. H. Ford. The unphysical nature of`warp drive'. Class. Quant. Grav., 14(7):1743–1751, jul 1997.arXiv:gr-qc/9702026, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/ 14/7/011

    1997 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Van Den Broeck

    C. Van Den Broeck. A warp drive with more reasonable total energy. Class. Quant. Grav., 16(12):3973–3979, nov 1999. arXiv:gr-qc/9905084, doi:10.1088/ 0264-9381/16/12/314

    1999 arXiv

  4. [12]

    S. V. Krasnikov. Hyperfast travel in general relativity. Phys. Rev. D, 57:4760– 4766, apr 1998. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4760, arXiv:gr-qc/9511068, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.4760. 103

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Everett and T

    A. Everett and T. A. Roman. A superluminal subway: The krasnikov tube.Phys. Rev. D, 56(TUTP-97-06):2100–2108, aug 1997. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.56.2100, arXiv:gr-qc/9702049, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.56. 2100

    1997 arXiv

  6. [14]

    F. S. N. Lobo and P. Crawford. Weak energy condition violation and superluminal travel. Lect. Notes Phys., 617:277–291, 2003. arXiv:gr-qc/0204038

    2003 arXiv

  7. [15]

    K. Olum. Superluminal travel requires negative energy density.Phys. Rev. Lett. , 81:3567–3570, oct1998. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 81.3567, arXiv:gr-qc/9805003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.3567

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. Natário. Warp drive with zero expansion.Class. Quant. Grav., 19(6):1157–1165, mar 2002. arXiv:gr-qc/0110086, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/19/6/308

    2002 arXiv

  9. [17]

    F. S. N. Lobo and M. Visser. Linearized warp drive and the energy conditions. pre-print, dec 2004. arXiv:gr-qc/0412065

    2004 arXiv

  10. [18]

    H. G. White. A discussion of space-time metric engineering.Gen. Relat. Grav., page 2025–2033, nov 2003.arXiv:gr-qc/, doi:10.1023/A:1026247026218

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    H. G. White. Warp field mechanics 101.J. Brit. Interplanetary Society, 2011.arXiv: gr-qc/

    2011

  12. [20]

    Lee and G

    J. Lee and G. Cleaver. Effects of external radiation on an alcubierre warp bub- ble. Physics Essays, 29(2):201–206, aug 2014. arXiv:gr-qc/, doi:10.4006/ 0836-1398-29.2.201

    2014

  13. [21]

    Mattingly, A

    B. Mattingly, A. Kar, M. Gorban, W. Julius, C. Watson, M.D. Ali, A. Baas, C. Elmore, J. Lee, B. Shakerin, E. Davis, , and G. Cleaver. Curvature invariants for the alcubierre and natário warp drives.Universe, 7(2):21, jan 2021. arXiv:gr-qc/ 2010.13693, doi:10.3390/universe7020021

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Bobrick and G

    A. Bobrick and G. Martire. Introducing physical warp drives. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38(10):105009, apr 2021. arXiv:gr-qc/2102.06824v2, doi: 10.1088/1361-6382/abdf6e

    2021 arXiv

  15. [23]

    E. W. Lentz. Breaking the warp barrier: hyper-fast solitons in einstein–maxwell- plasma theory. Class. Quant. Grav., 38(7):075015, mar 2021. arXiv:gr-qc/2006. 07125, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/abe692

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    S. D. B. Fell and L. Heisenberg. Positive energy warp drive from hidden geometric structures. Class. Quant. Grav., 38(15):155020, jul 2021.arXiv:gr-qc/2104.06488, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac0e47

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    C. J. Quarra. Creating spacetime shortcuts with gravitational waveforms.pre-print, feb 2016. arXiv:gr-qc/1602.01439

    2016 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Santiago, S

    J. Santiago, S. Schuster, and M. Visser. Generic warp drives violate the null energy condition. pre-print, may 2021.arXiv:gr-qc/2105.03079. 104

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Santiago, S

    J. Santiago, S. Schuster, and M. Visser. Tractor beams, pressor beams and stressor beams in general relativity.Universe, 7(8):271, jul 2021.arXiv:gr-qc/2106.05002, doi:10.3390/universe7080271

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Alcubierre and F

    M. Alcubierre and F. S. N. Lobo. Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Con- ditions, volume 189. Springer, 2017. arXiv:gr-qc/2103.05610, doi:10.1007/ 978-3-319-55182-1

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Shoshany

    B. Shoshany. Lectures on faster-than-light travel and time travel.SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes, 10:1, oct 2019.arXiv:gr-qc/1907.04178, doi:10.21468

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    White, J

    H. White, J. Vera, A. H. A. R. Bruccoleri, and J. MacArthur. Worldline numerics applied to custom casimir geometry generates unanticipated intersection with alcu- bierre warp metric.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(7):677, jul 2021.doi:10.1140

    2021

  23. [31]

    J.M. Burgers. A Mathematical Model Illustrating the Theory of Turbulence , volume 1 of Advances in Applied Mechanics. Elsevier, 1948. URL: https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065215608701005, doi:10. 1016/S0065-2156(08)70100-5

    1948

  24. [32]

    Abellán, N

    G. Abellán, N. Bolivar, and I. Vasilev. Alcubierre warp drive in spherical coordinates with some matter configurations.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(1):7, 2023.arXiv:2305.03736, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11091-5

    2023 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Abellán, N

    G. Abellán, N. Bolivar, and I. Vasilev. Influence of anisotropic matter on the Alcubierre metric and other related metrics: revisiting the problem of negative energy. Gen. Rel. Grav., 55(4):60, 2023. arXiv:2302.13826, doi:10.1007/ s10714-023-03105-8

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity

    James B.Hartle. Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity. Benjamin Cummings, illustrate edition, jan 2003

    2003

  27. [35]

    dÍnverno and J

    R. dÍnverno and J. Vickers.Introducing Einsteinś Relativity: A Deeper Understand- ing. Oxford University Press, 2022. URL:https://books.google.com.br/books? id=oCtzzgEACAAJ

    2022

  28. [36]

    Hawking and George F

    Stephen W. Hawking and George F. R. Ellis.The Large Scale Structure of Space- Time: 50th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2023.doi:10.1017/9781009253161

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    Landau and E

    L. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz.Classical Theory of Fields. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1975

    1975

  30. [38]

    Relativistic cosmology

    Amalkumar Raychaudhuri. Relativistic cosmology. i. Phys. Rev., 98:1123,

  31. [39]

    G. Darmois. Les equations de la gravitation einsteinienne. Memorial de Sciences Mathematiques, XXV, 1927. 105

    1927

  32. [40]

    Lichnerowicz

    A. Lichnerowicz. Is the space-time a superconductor?J. Math. Pures Appl., 23:37, 1944

    1944

  33. [41]

    Choquet-Bruhat

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat. Beginnings of the cauchy problem.Acta Mathematica, 88:141, 1952

    1952

  34. [42]

    Choquet-Bruhat

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat. Sur l’intégration des équations de la relativité générale. J. Rational Mech. Anal., 5:951, 1956

    1956

  35. [43]

    C. W. Misner and J. A. Wheeler. Classical physics as geometry.Ann. Phys., 2:525,

  36. [44]

    Arnowitt, S

    R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner. Gravitational-electromagnetic coupling and the classical self-energy problem.Phys. Rev., 120:313, 1960

    1960

  37. [45]

    G. F. R. Ellis. Relativistic cosmology.Cargèse Lectures in Physics, 6:1, 1973

    1973

  38. [46]

    K. S. Thorne and D. Macdonald. Electrodynamics in curved spacetime - 3+1 formu- lation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 198:339–343, Jan 1982. doi:10.1093/mnras/198.2.339

    1982 doi

  39. [47]

    Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity

    Miguel Alcubierre. Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity. Oxford University Press, 04 2008. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199205677.001.0001

    2008

  40. [48]

    Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de riemann et les espaces à torsion, 1922

    Élie Cartan. Sur une généralisation de la notion de courbure de riemann et les espaces à torsion, 1922

    1922

  41. [49]

    Riemann-geometriemitaufrechterhaltungdesbegriffesdesfernparallelis- mus

    A.Einstein. Riemann-geometriemitaufrechterhaltungdesbegriffesdesfernparallelis- mus. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Physikalisch- Mathematische Klasse, pages 217–221, 1928. English translation

    1928

  42. [50]

    Elektron und gravitation i.Zeitschrift Physik, 56:330–352, 1929

    Hermann Weyl. Elektron und gravitation i.Zeitschrift Physik, 56:330–352, 1929

    1929

  43. [51]

    Catalogue of spacetimes, 2010

    Thomas Mueller and Frank Grave. Catalogue of spacetimes, 2010. URL: https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0904.4184v3

    2010 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Gourgoulhon

    É. Gourgoulhon. 3+1 Formalism in General Relativity: Bases of Numerical Rela- tivity. Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. URL: https: //books.google.com.br/books?id=XwB94Je8nnIC

    2012

  45. [53]

    Choquet-Bruhat

    Y. Choquet-Bruhat. General Relativity and the Einstein Equations. Oxford Math- ematical Monographs. OUP Oxford, 2008. URL:https://books.google.com.br/ books?id=UjHbm5rfpi8C

    2008

  46. [54]

    Cargeselectures1998: Cosmologicalmodels

    G.EllisandH.vanElst. Cargeselectures1998: Cosmologicalmodels. In Cosmological Models, volume 541 ofNATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. C. Math. Phys. Sci., pages 1–116. Cargèse Lectures, 1999. URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9812046

    1999 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Evans.Partial differential equations

    Lawrence C. Evans.Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 2010. 106

    2010

  48. [56]

    W. J. M. Rankine. On the thermodynamic theory of waves of finite longitudinal disturbances. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 160:277– 288, 1870. doi:10.1098/rstl.1870.0015

  49. [57]

    Memoir on the propagation of movements in bodies, especially perfect gases (first part)

    H. Hugoniot. Mémoire sur la propagation des mouvements dans les corps et spé- cialement dans les gaz parfaits (première partie).Journal de l’École Polytechnique, 57:3–97, 1887. Translated as "Memoir on the propagation of movements in bodies, especially perfect gases (first part)"

  50. [58]

    Memoir on the propagation of movements in bodies, especially perfect gases (second part)

    H. Hugoniot. Mémoire sur la propagation des mouvements dans les corps et spé- cialement dans les gaz parfaits (deuxième partie).Journal de l’École Polytechnique, 58:1–125, 1889. Translated as "Memoir on the propagation of movements in bodies, especially perfect gases (second part)"

  51. [59]

    Courant and K

    R. Courant and K. O. Friedrichs. Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves, volume 21. Springer Science & Business Media, 1999

    1999

  52. [60]

    Y. B. ZelDovich and Y. P. Raizer.Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena. Courier Corporation, 2012

    2012

  53. [61]

    M. D. Salas. The curious events leading to the theory of shock waves. Invited lecture, 17th Shock Interaction Symposium, Rome, 4–8 September, 2006. Available as PDF

    2006

  54. [62]

    Shock Wave Compression of Condensed Matter: A Primer

    JerryW.Forbes. Shock Wave Compression of Condensed Matter: A Primer. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32535-9

    2012 doi

  55. [63]

    H. W. Liepmann and A. Roshko.Elements of Gasdynamics. Courier Corporation, 1957

    1957

  56. [64]

    A. H. Shapiro. The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Fluid Flow. John Wiley & Sons, 1953

    1953

  57. [65]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz.Fluid Mechanics, volume 6 ofCourse of Theoretical Physics. Pergamon Press, 1959

    1959

  58. [66]

    Lev Davidovich Landau and E. M. Lifshitz.Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, volume 8. Elsevier, 2013

    2013

  59. [67]

    t x :( - oo ,+ oo ) y :( - oo ,+ oo ) z :( - oo ,+ oo )

    J. Smoller and B. Temple. Global solutions of the relativistic euler equations.Com- munications in Mathematical Physics, 156:67–99, 1993. doi:10.1007/BF02096733. 107 A Sage manifold codes The computational scripts for this thesis were developed in Sage Manifold keywordstyle 1 ...

    1993 doi

  60. [1955]

    1123, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.98.1123

    URL: https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.98. 1123, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.98.1123

    doi

  61. [1957]

    especially pp. 578-584

  62. [2020]

    arXiv:gr-qc/2008.06560, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8355-2

    2008

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.