Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 55 references

Plasmon-polaritons on a single electron

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a single electron wave packet supports eight plasmon-polariton modes and reduces to a point dipole in the infrared.

desk verdict The off-shell polarization operator and the IR dipole action are solid new results, but the eight-mode claim rests on a local approximation that its own low-frequency branches violate. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00750 v1 pith:VMXKKLCI submitted 2024-12-01 hep-ph physics.plasm-phquant-ph

I.M. Akimov , P.O. Kazinski , A.A. Sokolov This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phphysics.plasm-phquant-ph PACS 12.20.-m
keywords plasmon-polaritonssingle-electronwavepacketphotonpolarizationoperatorin-informalismoff-shellphotonscoherentscatteringeffectiveMaxwellequationsdynamicalelectricdipole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that a single electron, when its state is a wave packet and it participates in coherent scattering, behaves like an effective electromagnetic medium rather than a bare point charge. Using the in-in (closed time path) formalism, the authors compute the one-loop photon polarization operator for off-shell photons and identify its singularities as plasmons. Coupled to the Maxwell field, these plasmons form eight independent plasmon-polariton modes with explicit dispersion laws, split by the electron wave packet's spin polarization. In the long-wavelength infrared limit, the plasma degrees of freedom collapse to a single dynamical electric dipole attached to the point electron, summarized by an explicit action. If the derivation is right, coherent scattering from one electron should show resonant enhancements and additional effective electromagnetic degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

The central object is the material part of the one-loop photon polarization operator in the Keldysh (in-in) representation, built from the electron wave-packet density matrix and its Wigner function. In the small-recoil, locally homogeneous approximation it collapses to equation (69), with a plasma frequency $\omega_p^2=e^2\rho/m$ and a spin-dependent antisymmetric term proportional to $s^\mu$. The poles of this operator at $(kp)^2-k^4/4=0$ are interpreted, via the standard effective-action result that singularities signal new quasiparticles, as single-electron plasmons with dispersion (72). The effective Maxwell equations (73), together with the mode equations (74), (76), (83), and (87), yield the eight plasmon-polariton branches, and the auxiliary-field action (96) removes the nonlocal operators in the infrared limit.

What would settle it

Solve the exact nonlocal effective Maxwell equations (43) for an electron wave packet of spatial size $\sim 1/(\alpha m)$ and check whether the branch whose energy approaches $\omega_p$ as $k\to 0$ survives; if it disappears, the local approximation overcounts the modes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At one loop and away from the photon mass shell, the photon polarization operator in the presence of a single electron wave packet takes the explicit off-shell form (69) in the small-recoil and locally homogeneous approximation. Its poles, where $(kp)^2-k^4/4=0$, define a plasmon dispersion law $k_0=\sqrt{m^2+k^2}\pm m$ in the electron rest frame. The effective Maxwell equations obtained from this polarization operator support eight independent modes: two longitudinal and six transverse, with the transverse degeneracy removed when the wave packet is spin-polarized, as in Eqs. (74), (76), (83), and (87). On the photon mass shell the permittivity reduces to that of a gas of free electrons, and in the infrared the nonlocal effective equations are reproduced by action (96), which describes a point dynamical electric dipole moving with the center of the wave packet.

Load-bearing premise

The eight-mode plasma picture assumes the electron wave packet's density and spin stay nearly constant over the mode wavelength, but the low-frequency branch has a wavelength much larger than a realistic Bohr-radius packet, so that branch violates the very condition used to derive it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherent processes such as stimulated radiation from a single trapped electron should show enhanced scattering near the plasmon-polariton resonances, where the ordinary perturbation series diverges and needs resummation.
  • The permittivity of a single electron wave packet, previously known on the photon mass shell, is now determined off shell and coincides there with the permittivity of a free-electron gas.
  • Spin polarization of the wave packet splits the transverse modes into circularly polarized branches, with the magnitude of the splitting controlled by the polarization degree $\xi$.
  • At long wavelengths the shape of the wave packet drops out: every single electron carries a dynamical electric dipole moment, and the effective Maxwell equations are governed by the dipole action (96).
  • The same fluid-like description applies to any charged-particle wave packet coupled to the electromagnetic field, since the derivation uses only the one-particle state and the in-in formalism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper is right, the eight-mode spectrum is a concrete experimental target: a single electron in a trap, illuminated by coherent radiation, should show narrow resonances at the predicted $k_0$ values, with lifetimes limited by pair creation above threshold.
  • If the paper is right, the low-frequency branch $k_0\approx\omega_p$ is the one to scrutinize first, because for a Bohr-radius wave packet its wavelength is much larger than the packet, violating the local approximation used to derive it; the honest test is to solve the nonlocal equations (43) in this regime.
  • If the paper is right, the same in-in mechanism should transfer to muons, protons, or any charged wave packet, giving particle-dependent plasma frequencies and coherent optical effects that scale with mass and packet size.
  • If the paper is right, the infrared action (96) implies a testable effective polarizability for a single electron, which could show up as a small correction to radiation reaction or to cavity-QED interactions of trapped electrons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives the one-loop photon polarization operator in the in-in formalism with a single-electron wave-packet initial state, giving the explicit off-shell expression (69). It identifies the singularities of this operator as plasmons with dispersion law (72), solves the resulting effective Maxwell equations in a local translation-invariant approximation, and claims the existence of eight independent plasmon-polariton modes (Eqs. 74, 76, 83, 87). In the infrared limit it derives a point-dipole action (96), arguing that a single electron in coherent scattering behaves as a fluid-like medium carrying additional effective degrees of freedom.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper provides a substantive off-shell generalization of the authors' earlier on-shell permittivity results and connects them to a concrete infrared effective action. The derivation is explicit and internally careful: the one-loop polarization operator is computed with stated assumptions, Ward identities are checked, vacuum renormalization is handled, and the on-shell limit reproduces the known gas-plasma permittivity. The infrared dipole action is a concrete falsifiable prediction. The main weakness is that the eight-mode counting relies on a local approximation whose validity condition is violated by the low-frequency branches, so the central claim needs additional justification or restriction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (73)] The translation-invariant mode equation (73) is obtained under the requirement that the wavelength of a plasmon-polariton be much smaller than the scale l over which ωp(x,k) and sμ(x,p) vary. The low-frequency branches in Eqs. (77) and (78) violate this requirement: for a wave packet of Bohr-radius size l∼1/(αm), the corrected plasma frequency is ωp/m≈√(4π)α^2≈1.9×10^-4, and for k0≈ωp the product kl≈ωp l≈2.6×10^-2≪1. These branches therefore belong to the infrared regime treated in Sec. 5, where the effective description is the point-dipole action (96), not plane-wave plasmon-polariton modes. The eight-mode count is thus not established for the low-frequency part of the spectrum.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (72)] The lower branch of the bare plasmon dispersion (72), k0=√(m^2+k^2)-m≈k^2/(2m), also has a long-wavelength regime with kl≪1 for k≲1/l. The paper does not specify the range of k for which the plane-wave, local description of these poles is valid. The relation between this low-energy branch and the Sec. 5 infrared dipole needs to be clarified; otherwise the quasiparticle interpretation of the full branch is ambiguous.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (79)] The numerical estimate ωp/m∼4πα^4≈3.6×10^-8 is incorrect: from ωp^2=e^2ρ/m and ρ∼1/l^3=(αm)^3 one obtains ωp/m≈√(4π)α^2≈1.9×10^-4. The corrected value still gives kl≪1 for the low-frequency branches, so the qualitative conclusion is unchanged, but the equation should be fixed.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eq. (87)] The phrase 'polynomial equation of the eight degree' should read 'eighth degree'; also, the statement after Eq. (83) that the two equations possess twelve solutions, six nonnegative, would benefit from one explicit counting sentence, since each cubic in k0^2 gives three roots for k0^2.
  3. [Fig. 2] The figure uses ωp^2/m^2=0.1 for visual clarity, which is not the physical single-electron value; this choice should be stated explicitly in the caption so that the asymptotic estimates in Eqs. (77) and (78) are not confused with the plots.
  4. [References] Reference [52] contains a typo: 'Lebedev Physics Insitute' should be 'Lebedev Physics Institute'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the polarization operator, plasmon dispersion, and eight-mode counting are derived from QED rather than fitted or imported from self-citations.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. The polarization operator (Eqs. 20–21, 31–32, 43) is computed explicitly in the one-loop in-in formalism from the QED action, with the electron state entering through the density matrix. Equation (69) follows under stated kinematic and narrow-packet approximations; no parameter is fitted to the final eight-mode or dipole claims. The plasmon dispersion (72) is obtained by solving the algebraic singularity condition (71) of this operator, which is the standard effective-action meaning of quasiparticles, not an input equated to the output. The effective Maxwell equations (73) are the translation-invariant specialization of Eq. (55), and the eight independent modes follow from solving the polynomial equations (74), (76), (83), and (87), not from reinserting the conclusion. The infrared dipole action (96) is an equivalent reformulation of the derived effective equations (95), so it is not a fitted prediction. Citations to the authors' earlier work [2,3] are used as cross-checks (on-shell limit, coherent-scattering framework) and are supplemented by independent comparison with gas-plasma results [18,29–34]; they do not carry the derivation. The skeptical concern that the low-frequency branches in (77)–(78) have wavelengths exceeding the wave-packet size, violating the local-constancy condition (50), is a legitimate internal-consistency or validity-regime objection, but it is not circularity: even if those branches are outside the approximation, that would make the eight-mode claim incorrect or unproven, not reduce it to its own inputs. Hence score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central results depend on the initial wave-packet state, the plasma frequency, and spin polarization; none of these are fitted to data, but they are inputs. The interpretive entities (plasmons, dipole) lack independent evidence.

free parameters (3)
  • plasma frequency omega_p(x,k_c) = not fitted; state-dependent. Figures use omega_p^2/m^2 = 0.1; physical estimate in Eq. (79) is misstated
    Controls all dispersion relations; derived from electron density but its numerical value is chosen for plots and should be a small parameter for the mode analysis.
  • spin polarization xi = figures use xi = 1/2; |xi| <= 1
    Parameterizes degree of spin polarization of the electron wave packet; enters dispersion equations (83), (85), (87).
  • electron wave-packet density matrix rho_ss'(p,p') = not fitted; arbitrary normalized input
    The whole material contribution depends on the initial electron state; the paper assumes it is narrow in momentum space.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard QED Feynman rules, Feynman gauge, and one-loop renormalization are valid.
    Used throughout Sec. 2; vacuum polarization is renormalized via Eq. (24).
  • domain assumption In coherent processes the initial and final electron states coincide, so the electron propagators factorize as S = S0 + i psi psi_bar, giving a 'material' contribution.
    Eq. (17) and Sec. 1; this is the basis for treating the wave packet as a medium.
  • domain assumption The wave packet is narrow in momentum and recoil is small (|q| << p_c, |q| << |k_c|), so the polarization operator is approximated by the Wigner-function form (69).
    Sec. 3, around Eqs. (56)-(69).
  • domain assumption The effective action's null vectors (36) define physical quasiparticles, so zeros of the effective Maxwell operator can be interpreted as plasmon-polaritons.
    Sec. 2 and Sec. 4; this is a standard in-in effective-action statement but its application to a single-particle state is interpretive.
  • domain assumption omega_p(x) and s^mu(x) are nearly constant on the mode wavelength, with m*l >> 1.
    Sec. 4, before Eq. (73); violated by the low-frequency branch as argued.
  • domain assumption The Wigner function rho(x,p_c) can be treated as a local density even though it is not positive-definite.
    Sec. 3, Eqs. (60)-(68); paper notes non-positivity but proceeds with rho(x) as a probability density.
invented entities (2)
  • Effective plasmons on a single electron wave packet
    purpose: Quasiparticles associated with poles of the one-loop polarization operator; basis of the eight-mode analysis.
    No quantitative experimental prediction is given; the poles coincide with ordinary on-shell electron-photon kinematics (2(pk) ± k^2 = 0), so independent evidence for a new collective mode is absent.
  • Dynamical electric dipole moment d^mu attached to the point electron
    purpose: Reproduces the infrared effective Maxwell equations via action (96); claimed to manifest in coherent scattering.
    The action is constructed so that eliminating d reproduces Eq. (95); no independent falsifiable signature or measurement is specified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Plasmon-polaritons on a single electron." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMXKKLCI

@misc{pith2026241200750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Plasmon-polaritons on a single electron},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMXKKLCI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00750}
}
abstract

The explicit expression for the photon polarization operator in the presence of a single electron is found in the $in$-$in$ formalism in the one-loop approximation out of the photon mass-shell. This polarization operator describes the dielectric permittivity of a single electron wave packet in coherent scattering processes. The plasmons and plasmon-polaritons supported by a single electron wave packet are described. The two limiting cases are considered: the wavelength of the external electromagnetic field is much smaller than the typical scale of variations of the electron wave packet and the wavelength of the external electromagnetic field is much larger than the size of the electron wave packet. In the former case, there are eight independent plasmon-polariton modes. In the latter case, the plasmons boil down to the dynamical dipole moment attached to a point electron. Thus, in the infrared limit, the electron possesses a dynamical electric dipole moment manifesting itself in coherent scattering processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00750 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The diagrams describing the contributions to the inclusive probability to record a photon in stimulated radiation from a single electron in an external electromagnetic field. The leading terms in the coupling constant are only retained and the diagrams obtained from the depicted ones by permutations of the photons lines are not shown for brevity. The vertical dashed line separates the contributions to transition amp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. On the left panel: The dispersion laws of plasmon-polariton modes on a single unpolarized electron in rest frame of the electron. The plasma frequency with the ordinary electron charge is taken to be ω 2 p/m2 = 0.1 for the curves of the dispersion laws to be discernable. The dispersion law in vacuum and the electro-positron pair creation threshold are also shown. The energies of plasmon-polaritons above the pair cre… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The same as on the right panel in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The lines on this diagrams are the free vacuum propagators and the external lines of the customary [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P. O. Kazinski, G. Yu. Lazarenko, Transition radiation from a Dirac-particle wave packet traversing a mirror, Phys. Rev. A103, 012216 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    P. O. Kazinski, T. V. Solovyev, Coherent radiation of photons by particle wave packets, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 790 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    P. O. Kazinski, T. V. Solovyev, Susceptibility of a single photon wave packet, Phys. Rev. D108, 016004 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    P. O. Kazinski, D. I. Rubtsova, A. A. Sokolov, Inclusive probability to record an electron in elastic electromagnetic scattering by a spin one-half hadron wave packet, Phys. Rev. D108, 096011 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    P. O. Kazinski, V. A. Ryakin, P. S. Shevchenko, Radiation from Dirac fermions caused by a projective measurement, arXiv:2406.19429

    work page Pith review arXiv

  6. [6]

    Marcuse, Emission of radiation from a modulated electron beam, J

    D. Marcuse, Emission of radiation from a modulated electron beam, J. Appl. Phys.42, 2255 (1971)

    1971

  7. [7]

    Peatross, C

    J. Peatross, C. Müller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, C. H. Keitel, Photoemission of a single-electron wave packet in a strong laser field, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 153601 (2008). 16

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    J. P. Corson, J. Peatross, C. Müller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, Scattering of intense laser radiation by a single-electron wave packet, Phys. Rev. A84, 053831 (2011)

    2011

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    J. P. Corson, J. Peatross, Quantum-electrodynamic treatment of photoemission by a single-electron wave packet, Phys. Rev. A84, 053832 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    M. Ware, E. Cunningham, C. Coburn, J. Peatross, Measured photoemission from electron wave packets in a strong laser field, Opt. Lett.41, 689 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Y. Pan, A. Gover, Spontaneous and stimulated radiative emission of modulated free electron quantum wavepackets – semiclassical analysis, J. Phys. Commun.2, 115026 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Remez et al., Observing the quantum wave nature of free electrons through spontaneous emission, Phys

    R. Remez et al., Observing the quantum wave nature of free electrons through spontaneous emission, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 060401 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    O. Kfir, V. DiGiulio, F. J. G. de Abajo, C. Ropers, Optical coherence transfer mediated by free electrons, Sci. Adv.7, eabf6380 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    L. J. Wong et al., Control of quantum electrodynamical processes by shaping electron wavepackets, Nat. Commun. 12, 1700 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    Roques-Carmeset al., Free-electron-light interactions in nanophotonics, Appl

    C. Roques-Carmeset al., Free-electron-light interactions in nanophotonics, Appl. Phys. Rev.10, 011303 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Karnieli et al., Modeling quantum optical phenomena using transition currents, Appl

    A. Karnieli et al., Modeling quantum optical phenomena using transition currents, Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 031305 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Tonks, I

    L. Tonks, I. Langmuir, Oscillations in ionized gases, Phys. Rev.33, 195 (1929)

    1929

  10. [18]

    Lindhard, On the properties of a gas of charged particles, Kgl

    J. Lindhard, On the properties of a gas of charged particles, Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk., mat.-fys. Medd. 28 (1954)

    1954

  11. [19]

    Pines, Collective energy losses in solids, Rev

    D. Pines, Collective energy losses in solids, Rev. Mod. Phys.28, 184 (1956)

    1956

  12. [20]

    J. M. Pitarke, V. M. Silkin, E. V. Chulkov, P. M. Echenique, Theory of surface plasmons and surface- plasmon polaritons, Rep. Prog. Phys.70, 1 (2007)

    2007

  13. [21]

    Bonitz, Quantum Kinetic Theory (Springer, Cham, 2015)

    M. Bonitz, Quantum Kinetic Theory (Springer, Cham, 2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    V. A. Bednyakov, D. V. Naumov, Concept of coherence in neutrino and antineutrino scattering off nuclei, Phys. Part. Nucl.52, 39 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, J

    J. Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, J. Math. Phys.2, 407 (1961)

    1961

  16. [24]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47, 1515 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)]

    1964

  17. [25]

    K. Chou, Z. Su, B. Hao, L. Yu, Equilibrium and nonequilibrium formalisms made unified, Phys. Rep. 118, 1 (1985)

    1985

  18. [26]

    E. S. Fradkin, D. M. Gitman, Sh. M. Shvartsman,Quantum Electrodynamics with Unstable Vacuum (Springer, Berlin, 1991)

    1991

  19. [27]

    B. S. DeWitt, The Global Approach to Quantum Field Theory , Vol. 1,2 (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2003)

    2003

  20. [28]

    E. A. Calzetta, B. L. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2008)

    2008

  21. [29]

    V. P. Silin, On the electromagnetic properties of a relativistic plasma, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.) 38, 1577 (1960) [Sov. Phys. JETP11, 1136 (1960)]

    1960

  22. [30]

    V. N. Tsytovich, Spatial dispersion in a relativistic plasma, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.)40, 1775 (1961) [Sov. Phys. JETP13, 1249 (1961)]. 17

    1961

  23. [31]

    D. B. Melrose, J. I. Weise, Optical activity in an isotropic gas of electrons with a preferred helicity, Phys. Rev. E68, 046404 (2003)

    2003

  24. [32]

    D. B. Melrose, Quantum plasmadynamics: Unmagnetized plasmas, Lect. Notes Phys.735 (Springer, New York, 2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    S. V. Vladimirov, Yu. O. Tyshetskiy, On description of a collisionless quantum plasma, Phys. Usp.54, 1243 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    D. B. Melrose, Quantum kinetic theory for unmagnetized and magnetized plasmas, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 4, 8 (2020)

    2020

  27. [35]

    Bernreuther, M

    W. Bernreuther, M. Suzuki, The electric dipole moment of the electron, Rev. Mod. Phys.63, 313 (1991)

    1991

  28. [36]

    J. J. Hudson, D. M. Kara, I. J. Smallman, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, E. A. Hinds, Improved mea- surement of the shape of the electron, Nature473, 493 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, CKM benchmarks for electron electric dipole moment experiments, Phys. Rev. D 89, 056006 (2014)

    2014

  30. [38]

    ACME Collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    M. E. Peskin, D. V. Schroeder,An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1995)

    1995

  32. [40]

    F. Haas, G. Manfredi, M. Feix, Multistream model for quantum plasmas, Phys. Rev. E62, 2763 (2000)

    2000

  33. [41]

    Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields Vol

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum Theory of Fields Vol. 1:Foundations (Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 1996)

    1996

  34. [42]

    P. O. Kazinski, P. S. Korolev, Exploring spatial dispersion in helical wired media: An effective field theory approach, arXiv:2402.16404

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    P. O. Kazinski, Radiation reaction of multipole moments, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.132, 370 (2007) [JETP 105, 327 (2007)]

    2007

  36. [44]

    Karlovets, A

    D. Karlovets, A. Zhevlakov, Intrinsic multipole moments of non-Gaussian wave packets, Phys. Rev. A 99, 022103 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Pupasov-Maksimov, D

    A. Pupasov-Maksimov, D. Karlovets, Passage of a vortex electron over an inclined grating, Phys. Rev. A 105, 042206 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    G. U. Jakobsen, Spin and susceptibility effects of electromagnetic self-force in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 151601 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    Marcuse, Transition radiation from a modulated electron beam, J

    D. Marcuse, Transition radiation from a modulated electron beam, J. Appl. Phys.42, 2259 (1971)

    1971

  40. [48]

    Talebi, Schrödinger electrons interacting with optical gratings: quantum mechanical study of the inverse Smith-Purcell effect, New J

    N. Talebi, Schrödinger electrons interacting with optical gratings: quantum mechanical study of the inverse Smith-Purcell effect, New J. Phys.18, 123006 (2016)

    2016

  41. [49]

    Gover, Y

    A. Gover, Y. Pan, Dimension-dependent stimulated radiative interaction of a single electron quantum wavepacket, Phys. Lett. A382, 1550 (2018)

    2018

  42. [50]

    Y. Pan, A. Gover, Spontaneous and stimulated emissions of a preformed quantum free-electron wave function, Phys. Rev. A99, 052107 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Y. Pan, A. Gover, Beyond Fermi’s golden rule in free-electron quantum electrodynamics: accelera- tion/radiation correspondence, New J. Phys.23, 063070 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    P. O. Kazinski, Coherent effects in scattering of particle wave packets, in Proceedings of Efim Fradkin Centennial Conference, Moscow, Russia (Lebedev Physics Insitute, Moscow, 2024). https://esf.lpi.ru/proceedings/qft/Kazinski.pdf 18

    2024

  45. [53]

    Gabor, Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts, Proc

    D. Gabor, Microscopy by reconstructed wavefronts, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A197, 454 (1949)

    1949

  46. [54]

    P. W. Hawkes, J. C. H. Spence (Eds.),Springer Handbook of Microscopy (Springer, Cham, 2019)

    2019

  47. [55]

    L. S. Brown, G. Gabrielse, Geonium theory: Physics of a single electron or ion in a Penning trap, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 233 (1986). 19

    1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.