REVIEW 1 cited by
Torsion in string-inspired cosmologies and the universe dark sector
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
I review several aspects of torsion in string-inspired cosmologies. In particular, I discuss its connection with fundamental, string-model independent, axion fields associated with the massless gravitational multiplet of the string. I argue in favour of the role of primordial gravitational anomalies coupled to such axions in inducing inflation of a type encountered in the "running-vacuum-model (RVM)" cosmological framework, without fundamental inflaton fields. The gravitational-anomaly terms owe their existence to the Green-Schwarz mechanism for the (extra-dimensional) anomaly cancellation, and may be non-trivial in such theories in the presence of (primordial) gravitational waves at early stages of the four-dimensional string Universe (after compactification). I also discuss how the torsion-induced stringy axions can acquire a mass in the post inflationary era, due to non perturbative effects, thus having the potential to play the r\^ole of (a component of) dark matter in such models. Finally, I describe briefly the current-era phenomenology of this model, with the emphasis placed on the possibility of alleviating tensions observed in the current-era cosmological data. A brief phenomenological comparison with other cosmological models in contorted geometries is also made.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reheating chiral dynamos with spin-0 and massive spin-1 torsions via chiral asymmetry
Adding a constant torsion trace to the chiral dynamo equation produces exponential magnetic growth with a sign set by torsion chirality, but the supporting equations and headline field strengths are not reliable.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.