Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 104 references

Quark flavors in hot and dense holographic QCD: setup and comparison to data

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The flavored V-QCD model with a massive strange quark makes cold quark matter run smoothly into nuclear matter, implying a weaker nuclear-to-quark transition than earlier holographic fits suggested.

desk verdict A solid flavored V-QCD setup with an honest but under-qualified headline claim; the smooth-matching result is partly an input, not an independent prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08087 v1 pith:VOIQEVHI submitted 2025-07-10 hep-ph hep-th

classification hep-phhep-th
keywords holographicQCDV-QCDmodel2+1flavorsstrangequarkmassequationofstatematternuclearlatticethermodynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper builds a 2+1-flavor version of the V-QCD holographic model, giving the strange quark a nonzero mass while keeping the light quarks massless, and fits the model to lattice QCD thermodynamics at low density. The central finding is that the resulting equation of state for cold, dense quark matter runs smoothly into nuclear-matter equations of state, without any parameter tuned to high-density data. The paper concludes that the nuclear-to-quark-matter transition has significantly lower latent heat than earlier unflavored V-QCD fits suggested. If correct, this changes expectations for neutron-star interiors and mergers: quark cores could appear in stable neutron stars rather than being destabilized by a strong first-order transition.

What carries the argument

The central object is the per-flavor tachyon field τ_i, whose nonzero strange component τ_s carries the strange quark mass, together with modified tachyon dependence in the flavor action: the tachyon potential V_f(λ,τ) is made gentler, and the gauge-field coupling w(λ,τ) acquires a strong tachyon dependence that is needed to reproduce the strange-quark susceptibility. The condensation of τ_s suppresses the strange-quark sector at low energies, which lowers the high-density pressure and enables the smooth matching with nuclear matter. The AdS2 and AdS5 fixed points of the scalar potential determine the infrared and ultraviolet endpoints of the geometries and thereby control the thermodynamics.

What would settle it

Recompute the high-density pressure at T = 5 MeV after fixing the hand-tuned parameters by an independent observable, for example the meson spectrum or baryon-number susceptibility at nonzero density; if the resulting equation of state does not cross the nuclear-matter reference points (APR, DD2, HLPS) around mu from roughly 350 to 500 MeV, the claimed smooth matching and low latent heat fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a flavor-dependent V-QCD model, a bottom-up holographic construction with a gluon sector and a tachyon field per quark flavor, can describe 2+1-flavor QCD thermodynamics. With two massless light quarks and a massive strange quark, the tachyon potential and gauge-field coupling are modified so that the model fits lattice data for pressure, interaction measure, and diagonal quark-number susceptibilities in the deconfined phase. At high density and low temperature, the model's quark-matter pressure, computed at T = 5 MeV under beta-equilibrium conditions, matches nuclear-matter equations of state smoothly for the 'standard' potentials, whereas the 'alternative' potentials lie above them. The paper interprets this as evidence that the nuclear-to-quark phase transition has significantly lower latent heat than in earlier unflavored V-QCD fits, and notes that this matching requirement constrains the previously underdetermined parameters of the model.

Load-bearing premise

The smooth match with nuclear matter rests on hand-tuning a few parameters of the model that the lattice data do not fix, and the paper assumes that tuning is a legitimate model-building choice rather than an adjustment made specifically to force the desired matching.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 2+1-flavor model reproduces the lattice equation of state, including pressure and interaction measure, in the deconfined phase at temperatures above about 150 MeV.
  • The high-density quark-matter equation of state meets nuclear-matter equations of state smoothly for the standard potentials without any adjustment to high-density observables.
  • The smooth matching implies a significantly lower latent heat for the nuclear-to-quark transition than earlier unflavored fits, which could allow stable quark cores in neutron stars.
  • Requiring this matching constrains the model's potential parameters, so flavor dependence sharply narrows the predictions compared with earlier unflavored studies.
  • For the standard potentials, the low-temperature equation of state stays within model-independent bounds obtained from interpolating between nuclear theory and perturbative QCD.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the paper leaves implicit is that neutron-star merger simulations using this equation of state should show weaker first-order transition signatures, making hybrid stars with quark cores more common and changing the gravitational-wave and kilonova signals.
  • The strong tachyon dependence in the gauge-field coupling, required to fit the strange-quark susceptibility, likely enhances the bulk viscosity of dense quark matter over earlier estimates, which would affect damping in mergers and could be checked against future observations.
  • The paper notes that the AdS2 fixed point disappears at large strange-quark density; a natural extension is to scan that regime and test whether a qualitatively different cold, strangeness-rich phase emerges.
  • The same flavor-dependent setup could be used to compute the symmetry energy of quark matter and to turn on magnetic fields that couple to each quark according to its electric charge, giving new observables for isospin-asymmetric matter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a flavor-dependent generalization of the V-QCD holographic model with N_f = 2+1 flavors, introducing a nonzero strange quark mass and tachyon-dependent potential functions. It analyzes the constant-scalar fixed points (AdS2 and AdS5), fits the zero-density thermodynamics and quark-number susceptibilities to lattice data, compares the low-temperature pressure with hadron resonance gas models, and computes the low-temperature, high-density equation of state of chirally symmetric quark matter under beta-equilibrium. The headline claim is that, for a chosen "standard" potential set, this quark-matter EOS smoothly matches nuclear-matter EOSs, suggesting a significantly lower latent heat for the nuclear-to-quark phase transition than in earlier unflavored V-QCD models. The paper is transparent that smooth matching is obtained only for a subset of potentials and that some parameters not fixed by the lattice fit were tuned to improve the match.

Significance. If the central claim were robust, the paper would provide a useful data-driven holographic model for hot and dense QCD, with concrete assets: an explicit flavored action and potential parametrization, a fixed-point analysis including tachyon fluctuations, comparisons to both WB and HotQCD lattice data, a comparison to HRG models, and a check against the model-independent Ecker-Rezzolla band. The numerical setup is standard and the parameter tables in Appendix C.1 make the construction reproducible. However, the significance of the headline result is currently limited because the smooth matching with nuclear-matter EOSs is partly an input to, rather than an output of, the parameter selection; the paper itself states that parameters not determined by the lattice fit were tuned to lower the high-density pressure and that no systematic parameter scan was performed. The lower-latent-heat conclusion should therefore be treated as conditional, not as an established model prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5.2, Fig. 9; Sec. 6] The central claim that the flavored V-QCD quark-matter EOS smoothly matches nuclear-matter EOSs is not established as a model prediction because the matching is used as a selection criterion for potentials. The paper states that W0 is not determined by the lattice thermodynamics fit and that "we also tuned other parameters that are not directly controlled by the lattice fit to improve the behavior of the pressure" (Sec. 5.2), and it concedes that "we did not carry out a detailed scan over the parameter space" (Sec. 6). Since the alternative potentials fail to intersect the nuclear-matter curves (Fig. 9), the SP result could represent a fine-tuned point in a flat direction rather than a robust consequence of the model. Please provide a systematic scan over the unconstrained parameters (W0, kappa-bar-1, and the large-lambda behavior of w) or an argument that the high-density EOS is insensitive to them, and report the fraction of allowed potentials that yield a smooth matching.
  2. [Sec. 5.2 and Abstract] The headline "significantly lower latent heat" is not quantified. The paper does not construct the nuclear-to-quark phase transition, does not compute a latent heat, and does not give a numerical measure of the smoothness of the matching; the claim rests on visual inspection of Fig. 9. Please define a quantitative measure (for example, the pressure difference at the would-be crossing, or the latent heat from a Gibbs construction) and report its value and its variation over the allowed potential set.
  3. [Sec. 4.3] The choice of kappa-bar-1 is explicitly made "to improve the consistency between the holographic quark matter EOS and nuclear matter EOSs" (Sec. 4.3), which introduces a circular dependence of the zero-density fit on the high-density target. This is not fatal by itself, but it should be controlled: either constrain kappa-bar-1 from zero-density observables with a stated uncertainty, or treat the high-density matching as an independent constraint and propagate it into the claimed uncertainty of the EOS and latent heat.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.3] The lattice comparisons in Figs. 6 and 7 are presented without any quantitative goodness-of-fit statistic or uncertainty estimate; adding chi^2 values or residuals would make the "good agreement" claim reproducible.
  2. [Sec. 4.3] The sentence beginning "We observed that with increasing strange quark mass, it becomes difficult to fit the interaction measure..." lacks a clear subject; please rephrase.
  3. [Appendix C.1] The relation kappa0 = 3/2 - W0/8 is stated without discussion of whether it is a fit constraint or an independent input; please clarify its status and origin.
  4. [Sec. 5.2] The approximation of the zero-temperature pressure by P - s T at T = 5 MeV is described as "so small that would be barely visible in the plots"; please give the numerical magnitude of the correction or show the T=0 curves to support this statement.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The high-density matching is partly constructed: unconstrained potential parameters (W0, κ, w) were tuned specifically to lower the quark-matter pressure toward nuclear EOSs, then the resulting smooth matching is reported as a model prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 5.2, paragraph defining SP vs AP and motivating parameter choices around Fig. 9]
    "Apart from adjusting the value of W0, we also tuned other parameters that are not directly controlled by the lattice fit to improve the behavior of the pressure in the region plotted in Fig. 9: We chose the function κ(λ) such that the pressure difference between the confined and deconfined phases was relatively high, and chose the function w(λ) at large values of λ, where it no longer affects the quark number susceptibilities, to be as small as possible. Both these have the effect of slightly lowering the V-QCD pressure with respect to the nuclear matter models."

    The claimed result is a smooth matching of the high-density V-QCD pressure to nuclear matter EOSs (and hence a lower latent heat). But the SP parameter point was selected using exactly that target: W0 was increased along a flat direction, κ was chosen to make the confined/deconfined pressure difference high, and large-λ w was chosen as small as possible, all to lower the high-density pressure relative to nuclear curves. The comparison is therefore an imposed consistency condition on the SP point rather than an independent prediction of a model fixed before seeing the nuclear-matter comparison. The paper even notes that AP fails because its pressure lies above all nuclear curves, and SP was introduced to fix this.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.3, paragraph after the susceptibility fit and before 'We remark that...']
    "This is intentional: similarly as the choice of the function κ(λ), choosing W(λ) such that it produces a low susceptibility at low temperatures improves the consistency of the high-density EOS with nuclear matter EOSs. We discuss this more in Sec. 5."

    Here the gauge-field coupling w(λ,τ) is chosen with the explicit goal of improving consistency between the high-density holographic EOS and nuclear matter EOSs. Later, in Sec. 5 and the abstract, the smooth matching with nuclear matter is presented as a key output and as evidence for a lower latent heat. Thus the conclusion is used to select the input potential, then recovered as the output: the derivation chain contains its own target.

1 more flagged steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4.3, paragraph on fixing Ts above 110 MeV]
    "lastly, to ensure that the temperature where the pressure of the symmetric branch vanishes in the holographic model, Ts, is a relatively high number, above 110 MeV, we also fix the parameter ¯κ1 of κ(λ) (see Appendix C.1) to a value higher than usually used in other potential classes of this model [66]. As we discuss in Sec. 5, this choice improves the consistency between the holographic quark matter EOS and nuclear matter EOSs."

    The parameter κ̄1 is fixed specifically to improve consistency between the holographic quark matter EOS and nuclear matter EOSs. That improved consistency is then reported as the main high-density finding. The parameter selection and the claimed prediction are therefore entangled: the high-density EOS was not computed from parameters that were determined independently of the nuclear-matter comparison.

full rationale

The paper is transparent about its procedure, and much of the framework is genuine calibration rather than circularity: the zero-density EOS and quark-number susceptibilities are fitted to lattice data, and the model reproduces them by construction, which is normal model-building rather than circular reasoning. The fixed-point and fluctuation analysis also has independent content. The circularity is concentrated in the high-density claim. The central result—smooth matching with nuclear matter EOSs and a significantly lower latent heat—is achieved only for the 'standard potentials' (SP), and the paper explicitly states that W0, κ(λ), large-λ w, and κ̄1 were chosen or tuned in directions that lower the high-density pressure and improve consistency with nuclear matter EOSs. The abstract's 'smooth matching ... suggesting significantly lower latent heat' is therefore not a prediction from a model fixed independently of that target; it is partly an input to the parameter selection. The paper also admits that no detailed scan of the flat direction was performed (Sec. 6), so the SP point cannot be shown to be representative rather than a manually selected point that forces the desired matching. This is the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern, and it affects the central claim, so it warrants a score of 7 rather than a lower score. There is no evidence that the result is forced by a self-citation chain or by definition, so 8-10 would be too severe.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is deliberately data-driven: many potential parameters are fitted to lattice QCD data, and several unconstrained parameters are manually chosen to improve the high-density behavior. The central claims therefore rest on these choices.

free parameters (8)
  • ms/Lambda (strange quark mass) = 0.2839
    Set to a lower value than in earlier work to remove the dip in the interaction measure and enable simultaneous fit to pressure and P/T^4 (Sec. 4.3).
  • tau_p (tachyon exponent in V_f) = 0.6
    Chosen to make the tachyon potential gentler and reduce the dip in the interaction measure (Sec. 4.3, Eq. 4.2).
  • beta_s, gamma_s (tachyon dependence in w) = 0.65, 10 (SP)
    Fitted to reproduce the difference between light and strange quark susceptibilities (Sec. 4.3, Eq. 4.3).
  • W0 (DBI normalization) = 5.886 (SP), 2.5 (AP)
    Not constrained by lattice thermodynamics; increased in SP to lower the high-density pressure and achieve smooth matching with nuclear matter EOS (Sec. 5.2, App. C.1).
  • kappa0_bar (kappa potential parameter) = 3.35 (SP), 1.8 (AP)
    Chosen so that the temperature where symmetric branch pressure vanishes exceeds 110 MeV, improving consistency with nuclear matter EOS (Secs. 4.3, 5.2).
  • w0, cw, w0_bar, w1 (w potential parameters) = 1.28, 1.1, 12, 0.4 (SP)
    Fitted to light and strange quark susceptibilities (App. C.1, Table 2).
  • Lambda_UV (energy scale) = 158.155 MeV (SP), 210.76 MeV (AP)
    Fitted to lattice data for thermodynamics (App. C.1, Table 1).
  • Planck mass M_p (45*pi^2*M^3*l^3/(1+7/4)) = 1.22 (SP), 1.32 (AP)
    Fitted to reproduce the Stefan-Boltzmann limit of the pressure (App. C.1, Table 1).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gauge/gravity duality extends to QCD in the form of the bottom-up V-QCD model.
    The paper states no precise derivation from string theory exists; the model is constrained by symmetry and adjusted to QCD data (Sec. 2).
  • domain assumption Setting N_c = N_f = 3 and ignoring 1/N_c and 1/N_f corrections is valid.
    The paper chooses to set N_f and N_c to three from the start (Sec. 2).
  • domain assumption The potential ansaetze and their asymptotic forms are adequate to describe QCD thermodynamics.
    Potentials are inherited from unflavored fits [66] with small modifications; validity is assumed (Sec. 2.2).
  • domain assumption Use of T=5 MeV black hole solutions approximates zero-temperature physics.
    The high-density EOS is computed at T=5 MeV and taken as zero-temperature approximation (Sec. 5.2).
  • domain assumption The integration path along an elliptic arc in (mu,T) space correctly determines the pressure integration constant.
    Used to connect finite-density black holes to zero-density solutions (Sec. 5.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quark flavors in hot and dense holographic QCD: setup and comparison to data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VOIQEVHI

@misc{pith2026250708087,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quark flavors in hot and dense holographic QCD: setup and comparison to data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VOIQEVHI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08087}
}
abstract

We establish a flavor dependent holographic framework for hot and dense QCD. To this end, we generalize a class of bottom-up holographic models for QCD in the Veneziano limit (V-QCD) by incorporating explicit flavor dependence. Specifically, we develop a $2+1$ flavor model characterized by two massless light quarks and a massive strange quark. Including the non-zero quark mass modifies the tachyon dependence of the model action, which yields a good agreement with the lattice data for thermodynamics in QCD in the low baryon number density and high temperature limit. We compare the model with various hadron resonance gas models at low temperature. We also compute the equation of state (EOS) at high density and low temperatures and found a smooth matching of this EOS with the nuclear matter EOS, suggesting significantly lower latent heat of the nuclear to quark matter transition than in earlier version of the V-QCD model. We observe that the smooth matching with the nuclear theory EOS is only applicable to a subset of potentials; furthermore, constraining the predictions of the model by limiting the potential parameters. We also identify the relevant fixed points of the model, particularly AdS$_2$ and AdS$_5$ fixed points.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Brambilla et al.,QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives,Eur

    N. Brambilla et al.,QCD and Strongly Coupled Gauge Theories: Challenges and Perspectives,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014) 2981 [1404.3723]. [2]LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration,GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 161101 [1710.05832]. – 39 – [3]LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi GBM, INTEGRAL, IceC...

  2. [4]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela and A. Vuorinen,Gravitational-wave constraints on the neutron-star-matter Equation of State,Phys. Rev. Lett.120(2018) 172703 [1711.02644]

  3. [5]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, E. Katerini, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, V. Paschalidis et al., Multimessenger Constraints for Ultradense Matter,Phys. Rev. X12(2022) 011058 [2105.05132]

  4. [6]

    Altiparmak, C

    S. Altiparmak, C. Ecker and L. Rezzolla,On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars,Astrophys. J. Lett.939(2022) L34 [2203.14974]

  5. [7]

    Buballa,NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density,Phys

    M. Buballa,NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density,Phys. Rept.407(2005) 205 [hep-ph/0402234]

  6. [8]

    Roessner, C

    S. Roessner, C. Ratti and W. Weise,Polyakov loop, diquarks and the two-flavour phase diagram,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 034007 [hep-ph/0609281]

  7. [9]

    Costa, M.C

    P. Costa, M.C. Ruivo and C.A. de Sousa,Thermodynamics and critical behavior in the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of QCD,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 096001 [0801.3417]

  8. [10]

    W.-j. Fu, J.M. Pawlowski and F. Rennecke,QCD phase structure at finite temperature and density,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 054032 [1909.02991]

Show all 104 references
  1. [11]

    Gao and J.M

    F. Gao and J.M. Pawlowski,Chiral phase structure and critical end point in QCD,Phys. Lett. B820(2021) 136584 [2010.13705]

  2. [12]

    Gunkel and C.S

    P.J. Gunkel and C.S. Fischer,Locating the critical endpoint of QCD: Mesonic backcoupling effects,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 054022 [2106.08356]

  3. [13]

    Policastro, D.T

    G. Policastro, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,The Shear viscosity of strongly coupled N=4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills plasma,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 081601 [hep-th/0104066]

  4. [14]

    Kovtun, D.T

    P. Kovtun, D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets,Viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. Lett.94(2005) 111601 [hep-th/0405231]

  5. [15]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

  6. [16]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,Low energy hadron physics in holographic QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.113(2005) 843 [hep-th/0412141]

  7. [17]

    Sakai and S

    T. Sakai and S. Sugimoto,More on a holographic dual of QCD,Prog. Theor. Phys.114 (2005) 1083 [hep-th/0507073]. – 40 –

  8. [18]

    Erlich, E

    J. Erlich, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,QCD and a holographic model of hadrons,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 261602 [hep-ph/0501128]

  9. [19]

    Da Rold and A

    L. Da Rold and A. Pomarol,Chiral symmetry breaking from five dimensional spaces,Nucl. Phys. B721(2005) 79 [hep-ph/0501218]

  10. [20]

    Karch, E

    A. Karch, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Linear confinement and AdS/QCD, Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015005 [hep-ph/0602229]

  11. [21]

    G¨ ursoy, E

    U. G¨ ursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti,Improved Holographic Yang-Mills at Finite Temperature: Comparison with Data,Nucl. Phys. B820(2009) 148 [0903.2859]

  12. [22]

    Panero,Thermodynamics of the QCD plasma and the large-N limit,Phys

    M. Panero,Thermodynamics of the QCD plasma and the large-N limit,Phys. Rev. Lett. 103(2009) 232001 [0907.3719]

  13. [23]

    J¨ arvinen and E

    M. J¨ arvinen and E. Kiritsis,Holographic Models for QCD in the Veneziano Limit,JHEP 03(2012) 002 [1112.1261]

  14. [24]

    J¨ arvinen,Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,Eur

    M. J¨ arvinen,Holographic modeling of nuclear matter and neutron stars,Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 282 [2110.08281]

  15. [25]

    Cruz Rojas, T

    J. Cruz Rojas, T. Gorda, C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen, A. Kurkela et al.,Estimate for the Bulk Viscosity of Strongly Coupled Quark Matter Using Perturbative QCD and Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 071901 [2402.00621]

  16. [26]

    Guenther,Overview of the QCD phase diagram: Recent progress from the lattice,Eur

    J.N. Guenther,Overview of the QCD phase diagram: Recent progress from the lattice,Eur. Phys. J. A57(2021) 136 [2010.15503]

  17. [27]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg, C. Ratti and K. Szabo,Fluctuations of conserved charges at finite temperature from lattice QCD,JHEP01(2012) 138 [1112.4416]. [28]HotQCDcollaboration,Fluctuations and Correlations of net baryon number, electric charge, and strangeness...

  18. [29]

    Cruz Rojas, T

    J. Cruz Rojas, T. Demircik and M. J¨ arvinen,Modulated instabilities and the AdS 2 point in dense holographic matter,2405.02399

  19. [30]

    Demircik, N

    T. Demircik, N. Jokela, M. Jarvinen and A. Piispa,Is holographic quark-gluon plasma homogeneous?,2405.02392

  20. [31]

    DeWolfe, S.S

    O. DeWolfe, S.S. Gubser and C. Rosen,A holographic critical point,Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 086005 [1012.1864]

  21. [32]

    Knaute, R

    J. Knaute, R. Yaresko and B. K¨ ampfer,Holographic QCD phase diagram with critical point from Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton dynamics,Phys. Lett. B778(2018) 419 [1702.06731]

  22. [33]

    Critelli, J

    R. Critelli, J. Noronha, J. Noronha-Hostler, I. Portillo, C. Ratti and R. Rougemont,Critical point in the phase diagram of primordial quark-gluon matter from black hole physics,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 096026 [1706.00455]

  23. [34]

    Demircik, C

    T. Demircik, C. Ecker and M. J¨ arvinen,Dense and Hot QCD at Strong Coupling,Phys. Rev. X12(2022) 041012 [2112.12157]

  24. [35]

    R.-G. Cai, S. He, L. Li and Y.-X. Wang,Probing QCD critical point and induced gravitational wave by black hole physics,2201.02004

  25. [36]

    Ecker, N

    C. Ecker, N. Jokela and M. J¨ arvinen,Locating the QCD critical point with neutron-star observations,2506.10065. – 41 –

  26. [37]

    Hata and M

    H. Hata and M. Murata,Baryons and the Chern-Simons term in holographic QCD with three flavors,Prog. Theor. Phys.119(2008) 461 [0710.2579]

  27. [38]

    Erdmenger, K

    J. Erdmenger, K. Ghoroku and I. Kirsch,Holographic heavy-light mesons from non-Abelian DBI,JHEP09(2007) 111 [0706.3978]

  28. [39]

    Hashimoto, N

    K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka, T. Ishii and D. Kadoh,Three-flavor quark mass dependence of baryon spectra in holographic QCD,Phys. Lett. B691(2010) 65 [0910.1179]

  29. [40]

    Y. Kim, Y. Seo, I.J. Shin and S.-J. Sin,Holographic Meson Mass in Asymmetric Dense Matter,1108.2751

  30. [41]

    Liu and I

    Y. Liu and I. Zahed,Holographic Heavy-Light Chiral Effective Action,Phys. Rev. D95 (2017) 056022 [1611.03757]

  31. [42]

    Fujii and A

    D. Fujii and A. Hosaka,Heavy baryons in holographic QCD with higher dimensional degrees of freedom,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 126008 [2003.13415]

  32. [43]

    Shock and F

    J.P. Shock and F. Wu,Three flavor QCD from the holographic principle,JHEP08(2006) 023 [hep-ph/0603142]

  33. [44]

    Afonin and I.V

    S.S. Afonin and I.V. Pusenkov,The quark masses and meson spectrum: A holographic approach,Phys. Lett. B726(2013) 283 [1306.3948]

  34. [45]

    Li and M

    D. Li and M. Huang,Chiral phase transition of QCD withN f = 2 + 1flavors from holography,JHEP02(2017) 042 [1610.09814]

  35. [46]

    Ballon-Bayona, G

    A. Ballon-Bayona, G. Krein and C. Miller,Strong couplings and form factors of charmed mesons in holographic QCD,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 014017 [1702.08417]

  36. [47]

    J. Chen, S. He, M. Huang and D. Li,Critical exponents of finite temperature chiral phase transition in soft-wall AdS/QCD models,JHEP01(2019) 165 [1810.07019]

  37. [48]

    Chen and M

    Y. Chen and M. Huang,Holographic QCD model for Nf=4,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 026021 [2110.08215]

  38. [49]

    Ahmed, M

    H.A. Ahmed, M. Kawaguchi and M. Huang,Effect of charm quark on chiral phase transition in Nf=2+1+1 holographic QCD,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 046002 [2401.04355]

  39. [50]

    T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kiritsis, C. Rosen and K. Tuominen,A holographic model for QCD in the Veneziano limit at finite temperature and density,JHEP04(2014) 124 [1312.5199]

  40. [51]

    Bigazzi, R

    F. Bigazzi, R. Casero, A.L. Cotrone, E. Kiritsis and A. Paredes,Non-critical holography and four-dimensional CFT’s with fundamentals,JHEP10(2005) 012 [hep-th/0505140]

  41. [52]

    Casero, E

    R. Casero, E. Kiritsis and A. Paredes,Chiral symmetry breaking as open string tachyon condensation,Nucl. Phys. B787(2007) 98 [hep-th/0702155]

  42. [53]

    Veneziano,Some Aspects of a Unified Approach to Gauge, Dual and Gribov Theories, Nucl

    G. Veneziano,Some Aspects of a Unified Approach to Gauge, Dual and Gribov Theories, Nucl. Phys. B117(1976) 519

  43. [54]

    G¨ ursoy and E

    U. G¨ ursoy and E. Kiritsis,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,JHEP 02(2008) 032 [0707.1324]

  44. [55]

    G¨ ursoy, E

    U. G¨ ursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,JHEP02(2008) 019 [0707.1349]

  45. [56]

    G¨ ursoy, E

    U. G¨ ursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, G. Michalogiorgakis and F. Nitti,Improved Holographic QCD,Lect. Notes Phys.828(2011) 79 [1006.5461]. – 42 –

  46. [57]

    Arean, I

    D. Arean, I. Iatrakis, M. Jarvinen and E. Kiritsis,CP-odd sector andθdynamics in holographic QCD,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 026001 [1609.08922]

  47. [58]

    J¨ arvinen, E

    M. J¨ arvinen, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau,Tachyon-dependent Chern-Simons terms and the V-QCD baryon,JHEP12(2022) 160 [2209.05868]

  48. [59]

    J¨ arvinen, E

    M. J¨ arvinen, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau,The V-QCD baryon: numerical solution and baryon spectrum,JHEP05(2023) 081 [2212.06747]

  49. [60]

    Cruz Rojas, T

    J. Cruz Rojas, T. Demircik, C. Ecker and M. J¨ arvinen,Towards holographic color superconductivity in QCD,2505.06338

  50. [61]

    Gubser,Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,Adv

    S.S. Gubser,Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000) 679 [hep-th/0002160]

  51. [62]

    T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kiritsis and K. Tuominen,On finite-temperature holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,JHEP01(2013) 093 [1210.4516]

  52. [63]

    Hoyos, N

    C. Hoyos, N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen, J.G. Subils, J. Tarr ´ ıo and A. Vuorinen,Holographic approach to transport in dense QCD matter,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066014 [2109.12122]

  53. [64]

    Are´ an, I

    D. Are´ an, I. Iatrakis, M. J¨ arvinen and E. Kiritsis,The discontinuities of conformal transitions and mass spectra of V-QCD,JHEP11(2013) 068 [1309.2286]

  54. [65]

    J¨ arvinen,Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,JHEP07(2015) 033 [1501.07272]

    M. J¨ arvinen,Massive holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,JHEP07(2015) 033 [1501.07272]

  55. [66]

    Jokela, M

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and J. Remes,Holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit and neutron stars,JHEP03(2019) 041 [1809.07770]

  56. [67]

    Ishii, M

    T. Ishii, M. J¨ arvinen and G. Nijs,Cool baryon and quark matter in holographic QCD, JHEP07(2019) 003 [1903.06169]

  57. [68]

    Amorim, M.S

    A. Amorim, M.S. Costa and M. J¨ arvinen,Regge theory in a holographic dual of QCD in the Veneziano limit,JHEP07(2021) 065 [2102.11296]

  58. [69]

    Faulkner, H

    T. Faulkner, H. Liu, J. McGreevy and D. Vegh,Emergent quantum criticality, Fermi surfaces, and AdS(2),Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 125002 [0907.2694]

  59. [70]

    Kutasov, J

    D. Kutasov, J. Lin and A. Parnachev,Conformal Phase Transitions at Weak and Strong Coupling,Nucl. Phys. B858(2012) 155 [1107.2324]

  60. [71]

    J¨ arvinen, E

    M. J¨ arvinen, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and E. Pr´ eau,Phases and phase transitions of U(1)×SU(2) symmetric holographic matter,JHEP03(2025) 005 [2409.04630]

  61. [72]

    T. Alho, M. J¨ arvinen, K. Kajantie, E. Kiritsis and K. Tuominen,Quantum and stringy corrections to the equation of state of holographic QCD matter and the nature of the chiral transition,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 055017 [1501.06379]

  62. [73]

    Ecker, M

    C. Ecker, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and W. van der Schee,Gravitational waves from holographic neutron star mergers,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103006 [1908.03213]

  63. [74]

    Gubser and A

    S.S. Gubser and A. Nellore,Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007 [0804.0434]

  64. [75]

    Q. Fu, S. He, L. Li and Z. Li,Revisiting holographic model for thermal and dense QCD with a critical point,JHEP25(2025) 221 [2404.12109]

  65. [76]

    Jokela, M

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen and A. Piispa,Refining holographic models of the quark-gluon plasma,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 126013 [2405.02394]. – 43 –

  66. [77]

    Misra and C

    A. Misra and C. Gale,The QCD trace anomaly at strong coupling from M-theory,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 620 [1909.04062]

  67. [78]

    Kushwah and A

    S.S. Kushwah and A. Misra,Bulk viscosity, speed of sound, and contact structure at intermediate coupling,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 126010 [2403.10541]

  68. [79]

    Borsanyi, Z

    S. Borsanyi, Z. Fodor, C. Hoelbling, S.D. Katz, S. Krieg and K.K. Szabo,Full result for the QCD equation of state with 2+1 flavors,Phys. Lett. B730(2014) 99 [1309.5258]

  69. [80]

    Lilani, D

    N. Lilani, D. Sandhu and S. Mahapatra,Comparative study of the butterfly velocity in holographic QCD models at finite temperature and chemical potential,2505.15357

  70. [81]

    Rischke, M.I

    D.H. Rischke, M.I. Gorenstein, H. Stoecker and W. Greiner,Excluded volume effect for the nuclear matter equation of state,Z. Phys. C51(1991) 485

  71. [82]

    Vovchenko,Hadron resonance gas with van der Waals interactions,Int

    V. Vovchenko,Hadron resonance gas with van der Waals interactions,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 29(2020) 2040002 [2004.06331]

  72. [83]

    Vovchenko, D.V

    V. Vovchenko, D.V. Anchishkin and M.I. Gorenstein,Van der Waals Equation of State with Fermi Statistics for Nuclear Matter,Phys. Rev. C91(2015) 064314 [1504.01363]

  73. [84]

    Vovchenko, M.I

    V. Vovchenko, M.I. Gorenstein and H. Stoecker,van der Waals Interactions in Hadron Resonance Gas: From Nuclear Matter to Lattice QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 182301 [1609.03975]

  74. [85]

    Vovchenko and H

    V. Vovchenko and H. Stoecker,Thermal-FIST: A package for heavy-ion collisions and hadronic equation of state,Comput. Phys. Commun.244(2019) 295 [1901.05249]

  75. [86]

    Akmal, V.R

    A. Akmal, V.R. Pandharipande and D.G. Ravenhall,The Equation of state of nucleon matter and neutron star structure,Phys. Rev. C58(1998) 1804 [nucl-th/9804027]

  76. [87]

    Hempel and J

    M. Hempel and J. Schaffner-Bielich,Statistical Model for a Complete Supernova Equation of State,Nucl. Phys. A837(2010) 210 [0911.4073]

  77. [88]

    Typel, G

    S. Typel, G. Ropke, T. Klahn, D. Blaschke and H.H. Wolter,Composition and thermodynamics of nuclear matter with light clusters,Phys. Rev. C81(2010) 015803 [0908.2344]

  78. [89]

    Hebeler, J.M

    K. Hebeler, J.M. Lattimer, C.J. Pethick and A. Schwenk,Equation of state and neutron star properties constrained by nuclear physics and observation,Astrophys. J.773(2013) 11 [1303.4662]

  79. [90]

    Ecker and L

    C. Ecker and L. Rezzolla,Impact of large-mass constraints on the properties of neutron stars,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.519(2022) 2615 [2209.08101]

  80. [91]

    Sen,Tachyon matter,JHEP07(2002) 065 [hep-th/0203265]

    A. Sen,Tachyon matter,JHEP07(2002) 065 [hep-th/0203265]

  81. [92]

    Sen,Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,Int

    A. Sen,Tachyon dynamics in open string theory,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A20(2005) 5513 [hep-th/0410103]

  82. [93]

    Kraus and F

    P. Kraus and F. Larsen,Boundary string field theory of the D anti-D system,Phys. Rev. D 63(2001) 106004 [hep-th/0012198]

  83. [94]

    Takayanagi, S

    T. Takayanagi, S. Terashima and T. Uesugi,Brane - anti-brane action from boundary string field theory,JHEP03(2001) 019 [hep-th/0012210]

  84. [95]

    Kovensky and A

    N. Kovensky and A. Schmitt,Isospin asymmetry in holographic baryonic matter,SciPost Phys.11(2021) 029 [2105.03218]. – 44 –

  85. [96]

    Kovensky, A

    N. Kovensky, A. Poole and A. Schmitt,Building a realistic neutron star from holography, Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 034022 [2111.03374]

  86. [97]

    Bartolini and S.B

    L. Bartolini and S.B. Gudnason,Symmetry energy in holographic QCD,SciPost Phys.16 (2024) 156 [2209.14309]

  87. [98]

    Bartolini, S.B

    L. Bartolini, S.B. Gudnason and M. J¨ arvinen,Isospin asymmetry and neutron stars in holographic QCD in the Veneziano limit,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 106021 [2504.01758]

  88. [99]

    Chesler, N

    P.M. Chesler, N. Jokela, A. Loeb and A. Vuorinen,Finite-temperature Equations of State for Neutron Star Mergers,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 066027 [1906.08440]

  89. [100]

    Domokos and J.A

    S.K. Domokos and J.A. Harvey,Baryon number-induced Chern-Simons couplings of vector and axial-vector mesons in holographic QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.99(2007) 141602 [0704.1604]

  90. [101]

    Nakamura, H

    S. Nakamura, H. Ooguri and C.-S. Park,Gravity Dual of Spatially Modulated Phase,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 044018 [0911.0679]

  91. [102]

    Ooguri and C.-S

    H. Ooguri and C.-S. Park,Holographic End-Point of Spatially Modulated Phase Transition, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 126001 [1007.3737]

  92. [103]

    Hoyos, A

    C. Hoyos, A. Olzi and D. Rodriguez-Fernandez,Weak rates in strongly coupled cold quark matter,JHEP12(2024) 058 [2407.21643]

  93. [104]

    Hernandez, C

    J.L. Hernandez, C. Manuel, S. S¨ appi and L. Tolos,Burgers equation for the bulk viscous pressure of quark matter,2507.00794

  94. [105]

    Jokela, M

    N. Jokela, M. J¨ arvinen, G. Nijs and J. Remes,Unified weak and strong coupling framework for nuclear matter and neutron stars,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 086004 [2006.01141]

  95. [106]

    Tootle, C

    S. Tootle, C. Ecker, K. Topolski, T. Demircik, M. J¨ arvinen and L. Rezzolla,Quark formation and phenomenology in binary neutron-star mergers using V-QCD,SciPost Phys. 13(2022) 109 [2205.05691]

  96. [107]

    Ecker, K

    C. Ecker, K. Topolski, M. J¨ arvinen and A. Stehr,Prompt black hole formation in binary neutron star mergers,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023001 [2402.11013]. – 45 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.