REVIEW 7 cited by
A Stress Test of Global PDF Fits: Closure Testing the MSHT PDFs and a First Direct Comparison to the Neural Net Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present a first global closure test of the fixed parameterisation (MSHT) approach to PDF fitting. We find that the default MSHT20 parameterisation can reproduce the features of the input set in such a closure test to well within the textbook uncertainties. This provides strong evidence that parameterisation inflexibility in the MSHT20 fit is not a significant issue in the data region. We also present the first completely like--for--like comparison between two global PDF fits, namely MSHT and NNPDF, where the only difference is guaranteed to be due to the fitting methodology. To achieve this, we present a fit to the NNPDF4.0 data and theory inputs, but with the MSHT fixed parameterisation. We find that this gives a moderately, but noticeably, better fit quality than the central NNPDF4.0 fits, both with perturbative and fitted charm, and that this difference persists at the level of the PDFs and benchmark cross sections. The NNPDF4.0 uncertainties are found to be broadly in line with the MSHT results if a textbook $T^2=1$ tolerance is applied, but to be significantly smaller if a tolerance typical of the MSHT20 fit is applied. This points to an inherent inconsistency between these approaches. We discuss the need for an enlarged tolerance criterion in global PDF fits in detail, and demonstrate the impact of data/theory inconsistencies in the closure test setting; namely, these do not lead to any increase in the $T^2=1$ PDF uncertainty. We also investigate the impact of restricting the PDF parameterisation to have fewer free parameters than the default MSHT20 case, and find this can be significant at the level of both closure tests and the full fit.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
A Determination of the Top Mass from a Global PDF Analysis
The top-quark pole mass is determined to be 172.80 ± 0.26 GeV from a global NNPDF analysis at approximate N³LO QCD including NLO QED, EW, and toponium corrections.
-
Assessing the Impact of Fitting Methodology at aN$^3$LO with FPPDF: an Open Source Tool for Extracting Parton Distribution Functions in the Hessian Approach
FPPDF, a new public Hessian PDF fitting code, shows that the relative impact of aN3LO corrections and missing higher-order uncertainties on PDFs is insensitive to whether a fixed polynomial or neural-network parameter...
-
Quantitative Understanding of PDF Fits and their Uncertainties
After an initial transient, a PDF-fitting neural network's output obeys f_t = U(t) f_0 + V(t) Y, a linear blend of the initial network and the data with explicit time-dependent operators.
-
MATRIX HAWAII: PineAPPL interpolation grids with MATRIX
Matrix Hawaii provides a public interface between PineAPPL and MATRIX that generates interpolation grids at NNLO QCD + NLO EW accuracy for a range of LHC processes, with sub-permille interpolation errors.
-
A Determination of ${\alpha}_s(m_Z)$ at ${\bf aN^3LO_{QCD}}\otimes {\bf {NLO}_{QED}}$ Accuracy from a Global PDF Analysis
From a global QCD-QED parton fit with NNPDF4.0 methodology, the authors determine alpha_s(m_Z)=0.1194^{+0.0007}_{-0.0014}, consistent with the PDG average and recent lattice results.
-
Fant\^omas Unconfined: global QCD fits with B\'ezier parameterizations
A C++ toolkit, Fantomas, uses Bezier control-point parameterizations to generate and combine diverse PDF fits within xFitter.
-
Global analyses of helicity-dependent parton distribution functions
Modern global QCD analyses agree that up-quark helicity is positive and down-quark helicity negative, with positive gluon polarisation at moderate x, while the full gluon spin moment remains limited by the unmeasured ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.