Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

A transient NEC violation during inflation would produce a correlated, multi-band gravitational-wave background from primordial black holes and their mergers, giving a new observational probe of energy conditions.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:36 UTC pith:VYUAI2IQ

load-bearing objection The genuinely new piece is small but real, but the flagship multi-band signal rests on abundances inherited from the authors' own earlier paper, never stated and never checked against basic PBH bounds. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.16292 v2 pith:VYUAI2IQ submitted 2026-02-18 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Holes formed by Null Energy Condition Violation during Inflation

Dong-Hui Yu , Jia-Zuo Zhang , Yong Cai This is my paper
classification gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th
keywords null energy conditionprimordial black holesstochastic gravitational wave backgroundscalar-induced gravitational wavesprimordial gravitational wavesPBH ringdownPBH binary mergersinflation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that a brief, stable violation of the null energy condition (NEC) during inflation does more than create primordial black holes: it leaves a correlated gravitational-wave background with several components spanning many decades in frequency. Building on an earlier treatment that computed primordial and scalar-induced gravitational waves, the authors add the two PBH-related channels—the quasinormal-mode ringdown of newly formed holes and the stochastic background from later binary mergers, including both two-body and three-body formation. The central quantitative claim is that for solar-mass PBHs, the low-frequency scalar-induced signal can sit in pulsar-timing-array bands while the high-frequency merger signal falls in the windows of future space- and ground-based detectors, so a joint multi-band detection would tie the gravitational-wave sky back to NEC violation during inflation. The authors find that the formation-ringdown component is always overshadowed by the scalar-induced background. A sympathetic reader should care because the paper turns an exotic inflation mechanism into a concrete, multi-observatory target.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the NEC-violating PBH scenario predicts a four-component gravitational-wave background whose components are not independent: the same transient phase of increasing Hubble rate that amplifies the curvature power spectrum—triggering gravitational collapse into PBHs—also amplifies the primordial tensor spectrum, and the PBHs themselves add ringdown and merger contributions at frequencies tied to their masses. The quantitative center is a spectral plot: for the solar-mass benchmark, the scalar-induced background peaks in pulsar-timing bands, the primordial background sits at lower or overlapping frequencies, and the binary-merger spectrum, dominate

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the NEC-violating phase itself, an interval during which the Hubble rate grows, amplifying both scalar and tensor perturbations on selected scales so that the same physical cause produces PBHs, scalar-induced gravitational waves, and primordial gravitational waves. On the PBH side, the paper chains three computations: a quasinormal-mode treatment of the fundamental ringdown mode with a hybrid matching scheme that enforces the physical low-frequency tail; merger-rate densities for early two-body and three-body binary channels, where the two-body rate scales steeply with the PBH abundance, making the merger signal extremely sensitive to that abundance; and the ins

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the PBH abundances and model parameters inherited from the authors' earlier paper are correct and observationally allowed; the paper never states the PBH abundances it uses, and the solar-mass benchmark is not checked against existing merger-rate or microlensing bounds.

What would settle it

A concrete check: for the solar-mass benchmark, fix the PBH abundance from the current upper limit on solar-mass binary merger rates measured by ground-based detectors and recompute the merger and scalar-induced spectra; if both peaks then fall below the sensitivity curves of pulsar-timing arrays and next-generation interferometers, the paper's flagship multi-band signature would not survive. A direct measurement or exclusion of the PBH abundance in the one-to-one-hundred solar-mass range would also settle whether the benchmark parameter set is viable.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • For solar-mass PBHs, the merger background is predicted to be within reach of next-generation interferometers while the scalar-induced background falls in pulsar-timing bands, so a joint detection would be a strong, correlated test of the NEC-violation mechanism.
  • The formation ringdown is always subdominant to the scalar-induced and primordial backgrounds, so PBH ringdown from this scenario is unlikely to be observed as a separate component.
  • Three-body merger channels add only minor corrections, making the merger prediction robust to the details of binary formation in the parameter space considered.
  • For asteroid-mass PBHs, the ultra-high-frequency merger spectrum is consistent with current big-bang-nucleosynthesis bounds on extra radiation, so the scenario passes that constraint.
  • Because the correlated components all trace back to the same transient NEC-violating phase, a multi-band detection would not merely find gravitational waves; it would point to the null energy condition being violated during inflation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: because the merger amplitude scales steeply with the PBH abundance, the multi-band signal is strongest exactly where the solar-mass PBH abundance is in tension with existing microlensing and ground-based merger-rate bounds; overlaying those constraints on the paper's spectral plot would immediately show whether the benchmark survives.
  • Beyond the paper: the same ringdown calculation could be extended to spinning PBHs, whose higher multipoles would shift the ringdown peak and possibly separate it from the scalar-induced background, turning a subdominant component into a potential discriminator.
  • Beyond the paper: the predicted correlation between a pulsar-timing-band signal and a high-frequency merger signal is a sharp fingerprint; a detection in one band but not the other would favor this mechanism over alternatives that do not amplify primordial tensor perturbations.
  • Beyond the paper: a combined multi-band analysis across pulsar-timing, space-based, and ground-based detectors could constrain the duration and amplitude of the NEC-violating phase more tightly than any single band alone.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends the NEC-violation-inflation PBH scenario of Ref. [37] by adding estimates of the stochastic GW backgrounds from (i) the ringdown of newly formed PBHs and (ii) PBH binary mergers, including two-body and three-body channels. The resulting spectra are overlaid in Fig. 2, with the PGW and SIGW components taken from Ref. [37]. The paper claims that, for the solar-mass benchmark, the model produces correlated multi-band signals—SIGWs in PTA bands and merger signals in DECIGO/BBO/ET/CE bands—and that these provide a new observational probe of NEC violation. The ringdown component is found to be subdominant, and the asteroid-mass case is shown to satisfy BBN bounds. The quantitative core of the paper is Fig. 2; however, the four model parameter sets and the resulting PBH abundances f_PBH are not reported, and the plotted curves are not independently reproducible from the information given.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper would be the first to put quantitative PBH merger and ringdown predictions into the NEC-violation-inflation framework, connecting a specific early-universe model to next-generation GW observatories. The paper uses standard published merger-rate and ringdown formulas, is candid about the subdominance of the ringdown component, and includes a BBN consistency check. These are strengths. The significance is currently reduced by the lack of tabulated model parameters and f_PBH values, which makes the central figure uncheckable and prevents a clear comparison with existing PBH constraints.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II / Sec. V / Fig. 2 / Eqs. (24)-(25)] The paper states that it uses 'the same four parameter sets' as Ref. [37] but never tabulates those parameter sets or the resulting PBH abundance f_PBH. The merger contribution scales steeply with f_PBH: Eq. (24) gives R2 ∝ f_PBH^(53/37), so a factor-of-10 reduction in f_PBH lowers the merger spectrum by roughly a factor 27, and the three-body term in Eq. (25) scales even more steeply. The 'compelling opportunity' of the blue solar-mass benchmark therefore cannot be evaluated from the paper as written, and no cross-check against existing constraints on 1-10 M_sun PBHs (LIGO/Virgo merger rates, microlensing, CMB accretion) is given. This is a load-bearing omission: if the inherited f_PBH values are excluded or are smaller than assumed, the advertised high-frequency multi-band signature disappears. Please provide a table with the four parameter sets, the PBH mass and f_PBH for each curve,
  2. [Sec. II / Fig. 2] The PGW and SIGW curves in Fig. 2 are adopted from Fig. 5 of Ref. [37], but the calculations underlying them are not reproduced here—neither the explicit forms of Pζ and PT nor the SIGW transfer function are given. Since the central multi-band correlation is between these copied spectra and the newly computed merger spectra, the reader cannot verify the amplitude, peak frequency, or even the existence of the claimed correlation from the present manuscript. Please provide the relevant formulas or a machine-readable data file for the PGW and SIGW spectra, and state clearly which inputs are assumptions versus results of the current computation.
  3. [Sec. V] The detectability language is stronger than what is actually computed. The text says the solar-mass merger signal 'falls within the sensitivity windows' of future detectors, but no signal-to-noise ratio or detection-statistic estimate is given, and the comparison is only an overlay of curves whose normalization is not specified. Given the steep f_PBH dependence, a few-percent change in the assumed abundance can move the curve below the relevant sensitivity. Please quantify the detectability (e.g., integrated SNR for DECIGO/BBO/ET/CE) once the benchmark parameters are stated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract / Sec. V] The abstract and introduction foreground the ringdown phase as part of the 'rich, multi-component GW spectrum,' but Sec. V states that the ringdown is always overshadowed by SIGWs and PGWs. Please rephrase the summary so that the ringdown is presented as a component that was calculated but found subdominant, rather than as a main observable signature.
  2. [Sec. III / Eq. (21)] The hybrid matching scheme is described qualitatively, but the matching condition, the value of A (beyond 'dependent on M'), and the transition function are not given. This makes the low-frequency ringdown spectrum not reproducible. Since the ringdown is subdominant this is not fatal, but the details should be supplied or a reference to a code/data release should be given.
  3. [Sec. V / BBN paragraph] The BBN bound is quoted as ∫Ω_GW h^2 d ln f ~ 1e-7, but the integration range is not stated and the statement 'only the early portion of mergers occurs before or during BBN' is not quantified. Please specify the frequency interval and the redshift cutoff used in the integral.
  4. [Throughout] Several typographical and typesetting issues remain: Eq. (1) has the EFT operator 'Lδg00R(3)' without proper subscripts, the 'PACS numbers:' line is blank, and the solar-mass window in Sec. V is written as '10^0−10^1 M_sun' but the precise blue curve parameters are not given. These should be cleaned up in revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the new ringdown and merger spectra are forward-model calculations using standard external formulas, with the underlying model and PBH abundances imported from the authors' prior PRL as independent input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is a forward chain: the NEC-violating model of Ref. [37] produces the curvature/tensor spectra and PBH abundances; this paper then applies well-established, independent formalisms for PBH ringdown (QNM decomposition plus an energy normalization set by ε) and for binary merger rates (Eqs. 24-25, taken from the published PBH-merger literature). No parameter in this paper is fitted to the GW spectra it claims to predict; the ringdown normalization is fixed by ∫(dE/df_s)df_s = εM, and the merger amplitude is set by the externally sourced f_PBH and standard astrophysical formulas. The PGW and SIGW curves are explicitly adopted from Fig. 5 of Ref. [37] (Sec. V: 'the results for SIGWs and PGWs are adopted from Fig. 5 of Ref. [37]'), which is a prior, independent calculation with stated assumptions and falsifiable predictions, not a re-statement of this paper's output. The heavy reliance on Ref. [37]'s parameter sets without tabulating f_PBH or confronting LIGO/Virgo and microlensing limits is a transparency/robustness weakness, not a circular one: nothing in the present equations reduces to itself by construction, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Therefore the central claim remains a model-derived extrapolation rather than an identity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central prediction consumes, without restating, the full output of the authors' earlier model (Ref. [37]): the four parameter sets, the enhanced P_ζ and P_T, the PBH masses and abundances. To those inherited inputs it adds hand-chosen efficiency parameters (ε, γ, K) and a custom low-frequency regularization for the ringdown. No new entities are introduced, and no parameter is fitted to data in this paper.

free parameters (5)
  • Ringdown radiation efficiency ε = 3% (optimistic) and 0.1% (conservative)
    Adopted by hand to set the overall ringdown amplitude via the normalization ∫(dE/df_s)df_s = εM (Eq. 20); spans an order of magnitude and directly controls the (subdominant) ringdown curve.
  • Three-body channel parameters γ, K = γ=1, K=4
    Fixed to literature values (Refs. [57,63]) for the numerical three-body merger rate (Eq. 25); they set the angular-momentum distribution and hardening.
  • Four model parameter sets {λ, Λ, α, σ, f1, f2, p, q} = Not reported in this paper (from Ref. [37])
    The background and power spectra P_ζ, P_T, PBH masses and abundances all follow from these; Sec. II only says 'we continue to use the same four parameter sets'.
  • PBH abundance f_PBH per benchmark = Not stated; inherited from Ref. [37] Fig. 5
    Merger curves scale as f_PBH^(53/37) (two-body, Eq. 24) and f_PBH^1.83 (three-body, Eq. 25), so the plotted amplitudes are direct powers of this unquoted input.
  • Hybrid-matching cutoff M f_cut = < 0.05
    Hand-chosen frequency below which numerical low-frequency ringdown artifacts are replaced by the analytic slow-damped-mode tail (Eq. 21); the transition function is unspecified.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption A transient NEC violation can be realized stably during single-field inflation using Beyond Horndeski/EFT with the f(φ)δg00R(3) operator controlling gradient instabilities.
    Adopted from the authors' earlier EFT program (Refs. [70-73]); the existence of the whole PBH-formation scenario presupposes this stability claim (Sec. II).
  • domain assumption The enhanced curvature power spectrum P_ζ computed in Ref. [37] collapses into PBHs with the stated masses and abundances on horizon reentry.
    f_PBH and mass scales are imported unchanged from Ref. [37]; all GW amplitudes inherit them without re-derivation (Sec. II, Sec. V).
  • domain assumption Early-universe PBH merger rates are described by the two-body formula of Hütsi et al. (Eq. 24) and the three-body formula of Raidal et al. (Eq. 25) for a monochromatic mass function.
    These literature formulas are the backbone of the binary-merger component; the paper assumes their validity and the monochromatic simplification (Sec. IV).
  • ad hoc to paper The formation ringdown is dominated by the l=m=2 fundamental QNM of a non-spinning Schwarzschild BH (Mω=0.3737−0.08896i), with an IR spectrum enforced to dE/df_s ∝ f^2 through the hybrid matching scheme.
    The single-mode, non-spinning truncation plus the custom low-frequency patch (Sec. III) define the ringdown prediction; the 'smooth transition function' is not specified.
  • standard math Stochastic GW backgrounds obey the universal IR scaling Ω_GW ∝ f^3 (equivalently dE/df_s ∝ f^2).
    Invoked (Sec. III, citing Ref. [59]) to justify replacing the divergent numerical low-frequency ringdown spectrum with the analytic tail of Eq. 21.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13936 in / 20359 out tokens · 189495 ms · 2026-08-02T22:36:16.399316+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

A transient violation of the null energy condition (NEC) during inflation provides a novel mechanism for producing primordial black holes (PBHs) and stochastic gravitational wave (GW) backgrounds. In this work, we extend previous studies by computing the GW contributions from both the ringdown phase of PBH formation and subsequent binary mergers. Our results show that this scenario produces a rich, multi-component GW spectrum consisting of primordial GWs, scalar-induced GWs, and GW emissions from PBH ringdown and binary mergers. We demonstrate that these correlated signatures across different frequency bands provide a novel and powerful avenue to probe or constrain NEC violation during inflation through future multi-band GW observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.16292 by Dong-Hui Yu, Jia-Zuo Zhang, Yong Cai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Schematic illustration of the GW generation framework driven by an intermediate NEC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Predicted energy spectra of the stochastic GW background for four different parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Does Eternal Inflation Violate the Smeared Null Energy Condition?

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    In canonical single-field eternal inflation, stochastic upward fluctuations do not violate the SNEC within the semiclassical slow-roll regime due to parametrically bounded drift and a strong timescale hierarchy N_SNEC ≫ N_BR.

  2. Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Holes: Connecting Low-Frequency Scalar-Induced Signatures to High-Frequency Binary Mergers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Establishes a model-independent link between scalar-induced GW backgrounds and PBH binary merger signals, including the mass-independent relation f_peak = 1.79 f_ISCO.

  3. Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Holes: Connecting Low-Frequency Scalar-Induced Signatures to High-Frequency Binary Mergers

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0

    For monochromatic primordial black holes, the low-frequency scalar-induced gravitational-wave peak and the high-frequency binary-merger ISCO frequency are linked by fISCO ≈ 3.4×10^20 Hz × (fSIGW/Hz)^2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 88 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Formation Phase Collapse→Ringdown

  2. [2]

    1: Schematic illustration of the GW generation framework driven by an intermediate NEC violation during inflation

    Binary Merger Phase Inspiral→Merger→Ringdown FIG. 1: Schematic illustration of the GW generation framework driven by an intermediate NEC violation during inflation. The inflationary NEC-violating stage is characterized by an increasing Hubble parameter (i.e., ˙H >0), which triggers an enhancement of the primordial power spectra Pζ andP T . This mechanism ...

  3. [3]

    Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,

    S. Hawking, “Gravitationally collapsed objects of very low mass,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.152(1971) 75

    1971

  4. [4]

    Black holes in the early Universe,

    B. J. Carr and S. W. Hawking, “Black holes in the early Universe,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.168(1974) 399–415

    1974

  5. [5]

    The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,

    B. J. Carr, “The Primordial black hole mass spectrum,” Astrophys. J.201(1975) 1–19

    1975

  6. [6]

    Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter,

    P. Ivanov, P. Naselsky, and I. Novikov, “Inflation and primordial black holes as dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 7173–7178

    1994

  7. [7]

    Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter,

    K. M. Belotsky, A. D. Dmitriev, E. A. Esipova, V. A. Gani, A. V. Grobov, M. Y. Khlopov, A. A. Kirillov, S. G. Rubin, and I. V. Svadkovsky, “Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A29no. 37, (2014) 1440005,arXiv:1410.0203 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,

    B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. 13 D94no. 8, (2016) 083504,arXiv:1607.06077 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,

    B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.70(2020) 355–394,arXiv:2006.02838 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation,

    J. Garcia-Bellido and E. Ruiz Morales, “Primordial black holes from single field models of inflation,” Phys. Dark Univ.18(2017) 47–54,arXiv:1702.03901 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  11. [11]

    On primordial black holes from an inflection point,

    C. Germani and T. Prokopec, “On primordial black holes from an inflection point,” Phys. Dark Univ.18(2017) 6–10,arXiv:1706.04226 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [12]

    Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes,

    C. T. Byrnes, P. S. Cole, and S. P. Patil, “Steepest growth of the power spectrum and primordial black holes,” JCAP06(2019) 028,arXiv:1811.11158 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with Nonminimal Derivative Coupling,

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, “Primordial Black Holes from Inflation with Nonminimal Derivative Coupling,” Phys. Rev. D100no. 6, (2019) 063532,arXiv:1907.05042 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Scalar induced gravitational waves in inflation with gravitationally enhanced friction,

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, “Scalar induced gravitational waves in inflation with gravitationally enhanced friction,” Phys. Rev. D101no. 2, (2020) 023529, arXiv:1912.05927 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  15. [15]

    Primordial black holes and oscillating gravitational waves in slow-roll and slow-climb inflation with an intermediate noninflationary phase,

    C. Fu, P. Wu, and H. Yu, “Primordial black holes and oscillating gravitational waves in slow-roll and slow-climb inflation with an intermediate noninflationary phase,” Phys. Rev. D 102no. 4, (2020) 043527,arXiv:2006.03768 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation,

    H. V. Ragavendra, P. Saha, L. Sriramkumar, and J. Silk, “Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves from ultraslow roll and punctuated inflation,” Phys. Rev. D 103no. 8, (2021) 083510,arXiv:2008.12202 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from ultra-slow-roll inflation,

    H. Di and Y. Gong, “Primordial black holes and second order gravitational waves from ultra-slow-roll inflation,” JCAP07(2018) 007,arXiv:1707.09578 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation,

    H. Motohashi and W. Hu, “Primordial Black Holes and Slow-Roll Violation,” Phys. Rev. D 96no. 6, (2017) 063503,arXiv:1706.06784 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  19. [19]

    Primordial black holes fromα-attractors,

    I. Dalianis, A. Kehagias, and G. Tringas, “Primordial black holes fromα-attractors,” JCAP 01(2019) 037,arXiv:1805.09483 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Primordial black holes and scalar-induced secondary gravitational waves from inflationary models with a noncanonical kinetic term,

    Z. Yi, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, and Z.-h. Zhu, “Primordial black holes and scalar-induced secondary gravitational waves from inflationary models with a noncanonical kinetic term,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 6, (2021) 063534,arXiv:2011.10606 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Supermassive Primordial Black 14 Holes for Nano-Hertz Gravitational Waves and High-redshift JWST Galaxies,

    H.-L. Huang, Y. Cai, J.-Q. Jiang, J. Zhang, and Y.-S. Piao, “Supermassive Primordial Black 14 Holes for Nano-Hertz Gravitational Waves and High-redshift JWST Galaxies,” Res. Astron. Astrophys.24no. 9, (2024) 091001,arXiv:2306.17577 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Scalar induced gravity waves from ultra slow-roll galileon inflation,

    S. Choudhury, A. Karde, S. Panda, and M. Sami, “Scalar induced gravity waves from ultra slow-roll galileon inflation,” Nucl. Phys. B1007(2024) 116678,arXiv:2308.09273 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Realisation of the ultra-slow roll phase in Galileon inflation and PBH overproduction,

    S. Choudhury, A. Karde, S. Panda, and M. Sami, “Realisation of the ultra-slow roll phase in Galileon inflation and PBH overproduction,” JCAP07(2024) 034,arXiv:2401.10925 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Resonant amplification of curvature perturbations in inflation model with periodical derivative coupling,

    L.-Y. Chen, H. Yu, and P. Wu, “Resonant amplification of curvature perturbations in inflation model with periodical derivative coupling,” Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138457, arXiv:2401.07523 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  25. [25]

    Enhanced curvature perturbation and primordial black hole formation in two-stage inflation with a break,

    X. Wang, Y.-l. Zhang, and M. Sasaki, “Enhanced curvature perturbation and primordial black hole formation in two-stage inflation with a break,” JCAP07(2024) 076, arXiv:2404.02492 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Regularized-renormalized-resummed loop corrected power spectrum of non-singular bounce with Primordial Black Hole formation,

    S. Choudhury, A. Karde, S. Panda, and S. SenGupta, “Regularized-renormalized-resummed loop corrected power spectrum of non-singular bounce with Primordial Black Hole formation,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 11, (2024) 1149,arXiv:2405.06882 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Primordial Black Holes Generated by Fast-roll Mechanism in Noncanonical Natural Inflation,

    S. Heydari and K. Karami, “Primordial Black Holes Generated by Fast-roll Mechanism in Noncanonical Natural Inflation,” Astrophys. J.975no. 1, (2024) 148,arXiv:2405.08563 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Primordial black hole formation from the upward step model: Avoiding overproduction,

    X. Wang, X.-H. Ma, and Y.-F. Cai, “Primordial black hole formation from the upward step model: Avoiding overproduction,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D34no. 06, (2025) 2550027, arXiv:2412.19631 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. I. Time-radial-symmetric metrics,

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti, and S. Vagnozzi, “Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. I. Time-radial-symmetric metrics,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 024009, arXiv:2409.02804 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. II. Non-time-radial-symmetric and loop quantum gravity-inspired metrics,

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti, and S. Vagnozzi, “Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. II. Non-time-radial-symmetric and loop quantum gravity-inspired metrics,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 2, (2025) 024010,arXiv:2409.02807 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. III. Covariant canonical quantum gravity models,

    M. Calz` a, D. Pedrotti, G.-W. Yuan, and S. Vagnozzi, “Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. III. Covariant canonical quantum gravity models,” Phys. Rev. D112 15 no. 12, (2025) 124015,arXiv:2507.02396 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Induced gravitational wave interpretation of PTA data: a complete study for general equation of state,

    G. Dom` enech, S. Pi, A. Wang, and J. Wang, “Induced gravitational wave interpretation of PTA data: a complete study for general equation of state,” JCAP08(2024) 054, arXiv:2402.18965 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Probing primordial black hole scenarios with terrestrial gravitational wave detectors,

    G. Dom` enech and M. Sasaki, “Probing primordial black hole scenarios with terrestrial gravitational wave detectors,” Class. Quant. Grav.41no. 14, (2024) 143001, arXiv:2401.07615 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Stochastic axionlike curvaton: Non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes without a large power spectrum,

    C. Chen, A. Ghoshal, G. Tasinato, and E. Tomberg, “Stochastic axionlike curvaton: Non-Gaussianity and primordial black holes without a large power spectrum,” Phys. Rev. D 111no. 6, (2025) 063539,arXiv:2409.12950 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    The impact of non-Gaussianity when searching for Primordial Black Holes with LISA,

    A. Iovino, Junior., G. Perna, and H. Veerm¨ ae, “The impact of non-Gaussianity when searching for Primordial Black Holes with LISA,”arXiv:2512.13648 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Can asteroid-mass PBHDM be compatible with catalyzed phase transition interpretation of PTA?,

    J. Zhong, C. Chen, and Y.-F. Cai, “Can asteroid-mass PBHDM be compatible with catalyzed phase transition interpretation of PTA?,” JCAP10(2025) 033, arXiv:2504.12105 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Numerical simulations of primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order phase transitions,

    Z. Ning, X.-X. Zeng, R.-G. Cai, and S.-J. Wang, “Numerical simulations of primordial black hole formation via delayed first-order phase transitions,”arXiv:2601.21878 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Primordial Black Hole Formation in Dust-Radiation Bouncing Cosmologies,

    X. Ye, L. F. Demetrio, E. J. Barroso, S.-F. Yan, and N. Pinto-Neto, “Primordial Black Hole Formation in Dust-Radiation Bouncing Cosmologies,”arXiv:2602.12057 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Primordial Black Holes from Null Energy Condition Violation during Inflation,

    Y. Cai, M. Zhu, and Y.-S. Piao, “Primordial Black Holes from Null Energy Condition Violation during Inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 2, (2024) 021001,arXiv:2305.10933 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Intermittent null energy condition violations during inflation and primordial gravitational waves,

    Y. Cai and Y.-S. Piao, “Intermittent null energy condition violations during inflation and primordial gravitational waves,” Phys. Rev. D103no. 8, (2021) 083521,arXiv:2012.11304 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Generating enhanced primordial GWs during inflation with intermittent violation of NEC and diminishment of GW propagating speed,

    Y. Cai and Y.-S. Piao, “Generating enhanced primordial GWs during inflation with intermittent violation of NEC and diminishment of GW propagating speed,” JHEP06 (2022) 067,arXiv:2201.04552 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Generating enhanced parity-violating gravitational waves during inflation with violation of the null energy condition,

    Y. Cai, “Generating enhanced parity-violating gravitational waves during inflation with violation of the null energy condition,” Phys. Rev. D107no. 6, (2023) 063512, arXiv:2212.10893 [gr-qc]. 16

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Broken blue-tilted inflationary gravitational waves: a joint analysis of NANOGrav 15-year and BICEP/Keck 2018 data,

    J.-Q. Jiang, Y. Cai, G. Ye, and Y.-S. Piao, “Broken blue-tilted inflationary gravitational waves: a joint analysis of NANOGrav 15-year and BICEP/Keck 2018 data,” JCAP05 (2024) 004,arXiv:2307.15547 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  44. [44]

    Null energy condition violation during inflation and pulsar timing array observations,

    G. Ye, M. Zhu, and Y. Cai, “Null energy condition violation during inflation and pulsar timing array observations,” JHEP02(2024) 008,arXiv:2312.10685 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Parity-violating primordial gravitational waves from null energy condition violation,

    Z.-W. Jiang, Y. Cai, F. Wang, and Y.-S. Piao, “Parity-violating primordial gravitational waves from null energy condition violation,” JHEP09(2024) 067,arXiv:2406.16549 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Climbing over the potential barrier during inflation via null energy condition violation,

    S. Pan, Y. Cai, and Y.-S. Piao, “Climbing over the potential barrier during inflation via null energy condition violation,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 9, (2024) 976,arXiv:2404.12655 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Constraints on inflation with null energy condition violation from advanced LIGO and advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs,

    Z.-C. Chen and L. Liu, “Constraints on inflation with null energy condition violation from advanced LIGO and advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs,” JCAP06(2024) 028, arXiv:2404.07075 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Detecting a gravitational wave background from inflation with null energy condition violation: prospects for Taiji,

    Z.-C. Chen and L. Liu, “Detecting a gravitational wave background from inflation with null energy condition violation: prospects for Taiji,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 11, (2024) 1176, arXiv:2404.08375 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Primordial Black Hole Ringdown: the Irreducible Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,

    V. De Luca, A. J. Iovino, and A. Riotto, “Primordial Black Hole Ringdown: the Irreducible Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background,”arXiv:2507.04083 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    Whispers from the Early Universe: The Ringdown of Primordial Black Holes,

    C. Yuan, Z. Zhong, and Q.-G. Huang, “Whispers from the Early Universe: The Ringdown of Primordial Black Holes,”arXiv:2507.07665 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds,

    E. S. Phinney, “A Practical theorem on gravitational wave backgrounds,” arXiv:astro-ph/0108028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and C. M. Will, “On gravitational-wave spectroscopy of massive black holes with the space interferometer LISA,” Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 064030, arXiv:gr-qc/0512160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  53. [53]

    Calibration of Moving Puncture Simulations,

    B. Bruegmann, J. A. Gonzalez, M. Hannam, S. Husa, U. Sperhake, and W. Tichy, “Calibration of Moving Puncture Simulations,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 024027, arXiv:gr-qc/0610128

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  54. [54]

    A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non-spinning binaries,

    P. Ajith et al., “A Template bank for gravitational waveforms from coalescing binary black holes. I. Non-spinning binaries,” Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 104017,arXiv:0710.2335 17 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 129901 (2009)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  55. [55]

    Notes on the integration of numerical relativity waveforms,

    C. Reisswig and D. Pollney, “Notes on the integration of numerical relativity waveforms,” Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 195015,arXiv:1006.1632 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  56. [56]

    Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Coalescing Binary Black Holes,

    X.-J. Zhu, E. Howell, T. Regimbau, D. Blair, and Z.-H. Zhu, “Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Coalescing Binary Black Holes,” Astrophys. J.739(2011) 86, arXiv:1104.3565 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    On the gravitational wave background from compact binary coalescences in the band of ground-based interferometers,

    X.-J. Zhu, E. J. Howell, D. G. Blair, and Z.-H. Zhu, “On the gravitational wave background from compact binary coalescences in the band of ground-based interferometers,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.431no. 1, (2013) 882–899,arXiv:1209.0595 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  58. [58]

    A Black-Hole Primer: Particles, Waves, Critical Phenomena and Superradiant Instabilities,

    E. Berti, “A Black-Hole Primer: Particles, Waves, Critical Phenomena and Superradiant Instabilities,” 10, 2014.arXiv:1410.4481 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  59. [59]

    Formation and Evolution of Primordial Black Hole Binaries in the Early Universe,

    M. Raidal, C. Spethmann, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, “Formation and Evolution of Primordial Black Hole Binaries in the Early Universe,” JCAP02(2019) 018, arXiv:1812.01930 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Lower bound on the primordial black hole merger rate,

    V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ ae, “Lower bound on the primordial black hole merger rate,” Phys. Rev. D101no. 4, (2020) 043015,arXiv:1908.09752 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra,

    R.-G. Cai, S. Pi, and M. Sasaki, “Universal infrared scaling of gravitational wave background spectra,” Phys. Rev. D102no. 8, (2020) 083528,arXiv:1909.13728 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    Two populations of LIGO-Virgo black holes,

    G. H¨ utsi, M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, “Two populations of LIGO-Virgo black holes,” JCAP03(2021) 068,arXiv:2012.02786 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Franciolini, I

    G. Franciolini, I. Musco, P. Pani, and A. Urbano, “From inflation to black hole mergers and back again: Gravitational-wave data-driven constraints on inflationary scenarios with a first-principle model of primordial black holes across the QCD epoch,” Phys. Rev. D106 no. 12, (2022) 123526,arXiv:2209.05959 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  64. [64]

    Dynamical Lensing Tomography of Black Hole Ringdowns,

    Z. Zhong, V. Cardoso, and Y. Chen, “Dynamical Lensing Tomography of Black Hole Ringdowns,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134no. 21, (2025) 211402,arXiv:2408.10303 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Raidal, V

    M. Raidal, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ ae, Formation of Primordial Black Hole Binaries and Their Merger Rates. 2025. arXiv:2404.08416 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Waveform stability of black hole ringdown with stochastic horizon structure,

    H.-W. Hu, C.-J. Fang, and Z.-K. Guo, “Waveform stability of black hole ringdown with stochastic horizon structure,”arXiv:2602.08034 [gr-qc]. 18

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  67. [67]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, “Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes,” Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 163001,arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  68. [68]

    Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,

    J. Abedi et al., “Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,”arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    The Null Energy Condition and its violation,

    V. A. Rubakov, “The Null Energy Condition and its violation,” Phys. Usp.57(2014) 128–142,arXiv:1401.4024 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [70]

    A Primer on Energy Conditions,

    E. Curiel, “A Primer on Energy Conditions,” Einstein Stud.13(2017) 43–104, arXiv:1405.0403 [physics.hist-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory,

    E.-A. Kontou and K. Sanders, “Energy conditions in general relativity and quantum field theory,” Class. Quant. Grav.37no. 19, (2020) 193001,arXiv:2003.01815 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  72. [72]

    The Effective Field Theory of nonsingular cosmology,

    Y. Cai, Y. Wan, H.-G. Li, T. Qiu, and Y.-S. Piao, “The Effective Field Theory of nonsingular cosmology,” JHEP01(2017) 090,arXiv:1610.03400 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Stability of Geodesically Complete Cosmologies,

    P. Creminelli, D. Pirtskhalava, L. Santoni, and E. Trincherini, “Stability of Geodesically Complete Cosmologies,” JCAP11(2016) 047,arXiv:1610.04207 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  74. [74]

    The Effective Field Theory of nonsingular cosmology: II,

    Y. Cai, H.-G. Li, T. Qiu, and Y.-S. Piao, “The Effective Field Theory of nonsingular cosmology: II,” Eur. Phys. J. C77no. 6, (2017) 369,arXiv:1701.04330 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    A covariant Lagrangian for stable nonsingular bounce,

    Y. Cai and Y.-S. Piao, “A covariant Lagrangian for stable nonsingular bounce,” JHEP09 (2017) 027,arXiv:1705.03401 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    Cosmological bounce and Genesis beyond Horndeski,

    R. Kolevatov, S. Mironov, N. Sukhov, and V. Volkova, “Cosmological bounce and Genesis beyond Horndeski,” JCAP08(2017) 038,arXiv:1705.06626 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [77]

    DHOST Bounce,

    A. Ilyas, M. Zhu, Y. Zheng, Y.-F. Cai, and E. N. Saridakis, “DHOST Bounce,” JCAP09 (2020) 002,arXiv:2002.08269 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  78. [78]

    Classically stable nonsingular cosmological bounces,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Classically stable nonsingular cosmological bounces,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117no. 12, (2016) 121304,arXiv:1606.08880 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  79. [79]

    Fully stable cosmological solutions with a non-singular classical bounce,

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, “Fully stable cosmological solutions with a non-singular classical bounce,” Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 289–294,arXiv:1609.01253 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  80. [80]

    Higher order derivative coupling to gravity and its cosmological implications,

    Y. Cai and Y.-S. Piao, “Higher order derivative coupling to gravity and its cosmological implications,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 12, (2017) 124028,arXiv:1707.01017 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.