Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 67 references

1D Luttinger Modes in Carbon Nanotubes as keV Dark Matter Detector

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A metallic carbon nanotube's collective charge mode could serve as a competitive detector for keV–MeV dark matter.

desk verdict A legitimately new theoretical target, but the parallel-forest readout contradicts the impedance-matching requirement, so the reach claims are unvalidated. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.15338 v1 pith:WBR2JTMA submitted 2026-07-16 hep-ph hep-ex

Xiuyuan Zhang , Hao Chen This is my paper
classification hep-phhep-ex PACS 95.35.+d
keywords darkmatterdirectdetectioncarbonnanotubesLuttingerliquidone-dimensionalplasmonsub-MeVfreeze-inbenchmarksiderealmodulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that a metallic carbon nanotube, excited by a passing light dark-matter particle, responds not through individual electron-hole excitations but through a collective one-dimensional charge wave—a Luttinger-liquid charge mode—whose dynamical structure factor is a sharp line S(q,ω)=g|q|δ(ω−v|q|). Because dark matter couples to electron density, this concentrates the scattering rate into a single propagating mode rather than spreading it over a continuum. Using an accumulated nanotube length of 10^8 m (milligram-scale target), the projected sensitivity reaches down to keV–MeV dark matter, and with a light mediator it can probe the cosmologically motivated freeze-in benchmark in the keV range. The one-dimensional geometry also gives a sidereal-day modulation, a handle against time-independent backgrounds. A sympathetic reader would care because it opens a new target class for sub-MeV dark-matter detection using a commercially scalable material.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Luttinger-liquid collective charge mode of a one-dimensional conductor—the density wave that replaces independent electron excitations at low energy. The paper's key identity is S_1D(q,ω)=g|q|δ(ω−v|q|), a sharp propagating mode with interaction parameter g and velocity v, derived by bosonization of interacting right- and left-moving electrons. This mode does the work: since dark matter couples to density, it converts the scattering rate into a delta-function in energy and momentum along the nanotube, enhancing response relative to a particle-hole continuum, and its one-dimensional nature generates the daily modulation. The transverse structure is folded in through a

What would settle it

Measure the low-energy dynamic structure factor of an aligned metallic-nanotube sample in the meV range; if the response is a broad continuum rather than a sharp peak at ω=v|q|, the rate enhancement that drives the sensitivity collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the low-energy charge response of a metallic single-wall carbon nanotube is not a particle-hole continuum but a single collective mode described by Luttinger liquid theory, with S_1D(q,ω)=g|q|δ(ω−v|q|). The paper computes the dark-matter-electron scattering rate using this structure factor together with a factorized transverse density profile, and finds that for a milligram-scale target (accumulated nanotube length ~10^8 m) and readout thresholds of 6 meV or 0.5 meV, the projected sensitivity is competitive in the keV–MeV mass range. In the light-mediator case, the reach touches the freeze-in benchmark at keV masses. The same one-dimensional anisotropy that produces

Load-bearing premise

The projected sensitivity rests on the assumption that a dark-matter hit in the nanotube ends up as a measurable quasiparticle signal in a superconducting readout—if plasmon-to-quasiparticle conversion is inefficient or lossy, the sensitivity curves overstate what a real detector would see.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, a milligram-scale array of aligned metallic nanotubes can probe dark-matter masses from roughly keV to MeV, a range where many proposed targets lose sensitivity.
  • In the light-mediator case, the same detector can reach the freeze-in cosmological benchmark at keV masses, making a specific, motivated model testable.
  • The predicted sidereal-day modulation (amplitude about 0.3 for the benchmark parameters) provides a built-in background discriminant without extra hardware.
  • The approach introduces one-dimensional collective modes—rather than single-electron excitations—as a new class of condensed-matter dark-matter targets.
  • The projected sensitivity is competitive with gapless two-dimensional targets in the 10–100 keV mass range for a 6 meV threshold, and more broadly below about 100 keV for a 0.5 meV threshold.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: Because the signal relies on the sharpness of the delta-function mode, a direct measurement of the low-energy dynamic structure factor of fabricated metallic nanotubes would be a telling test before building a full detector.
  • Editorial inference: The same collective-mode mechanism could plausibly extend to other one-dimensional conductors, such as semiconductor nanowires hosting a 1D electron gas, where the Luttinger parameter and velocity can be tuned; the paper studies only carbon nanotubes.
  • Editorial inference: In a dense forest of nanotubes, intertube Coulomb coupling and screening could broaden the delta-function mode; the paper flags this geometric constraint, and a testable scaling experiment would vary nanotube packing density and observe how the projected sensitivity shifts.
  • Editorial inference: The daily modulation amplitude depends on the alignment of the nanotube axis relative to Earth's rotation axis, so choosing the orientation to maximize modulation is a design optimization the paper mentions but does not develop.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using metallic carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a dark-matter target, arguing that the low-energy charge response of a metallic CNT is a 1D Luttinger-liquid collective mode. It derives the dynamic structure factor S_1D(q,ω) = g|q|δ(ω − v|q|) via bosonization, uses it to compute DM–electron scattering rates following the standard heavy/light mediator framework, and projects sensitivity for a milligram-scale CNT target with two readout thresholds (E_th = 6 meV and 0.5 meV). The authors claim competitive reach for keV–MeV DM and, in the light-mediator case, sensitivity to the freeze-in benchmark, and they propose sidereal-day modulation as a background discriminator.

Significance. The theoretical core is a clean, standard bosonization calculation of the 1D Luttinger-liquid response, and applying it to DM direct detection is a genuinely new idea that could open a new target class. The paper also provides a concrete falsifiable prediction — the daily modulation pattern — and compares its projections with existing graphene and superconductor proposals. If the detector readout could be made to work, the projected reach would be competitive with other far-term quantum-material proposals. However, the projected sensitivity depends critically on an unproven and internally inconsistent readout architecture, which is the main obstacle to the paper's central claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Detectors and projected sensitivity, Fig. 1 and impedance-matching paragraph] The proposed detector is a forest of N_CNT ~ 10^13 SWCNTs "connected in parallel between two absorber contacts," while the coupling structure is required to present ~10 kΩ to match the CNT plasmon mode. For a signal in one tube, the common node is loaded by the parallel combination of the intended termination and the input impedance of the other N−1 tubes. With each tube having Z0 ~ 10 kΩ, the other tubes present Z0/(N−1) ≈ 1 nΩ, so even an ideal single-tube termination gives an effective load Z0/N and a reflection coefficient near unity. The stated geometry therefore cannot simultaneously match every tube; the order-unity plasmon-to-quasiparticle conversion assumed in the sensitivity curves is not attainable. Please specify a readout architecture that avoids this parallel loading (e.g., per-tube matched terminations) or present projected sensitivities as a function of conversion efficie
  2. [Eq. (6), DM scattering rate] The rate formula contains Θ(q∥) and an energy-conservation delta δ(q·vχ − q^2/(2mχ) − v q∥), while the S_1D used in the same equation is even in q∥, S_1D ∝ g|q∥|δ(ω − v|q∥|). The Θ(q∥) discards the q∥ < 0 branch of the 1D response without physical justification. If the readout detects only modes propagating toward one end, this is a detection-efficiency choice and should be stated; otherwise the rate integral is missing an O(1) contribution. The sign of the resulting error in the projected cross-section limit should be checked and the formula corrected to δ(q·vχ − q^2/(2mχ) − v|q∥|) or explicitly justified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Backgrounds and daily modulation] The background-free assumption at 95% CL (3 events/yr) is a strong input to the projected reach. The quoted raw quasiparticle switching rates (kHz for QCD, 3–10 Hz for SQUAT) are many orders of magnitude above the assumed background; the multi-switch coincidence argument is plausible but unquantified. Please state explicitly that the projected curves assume the coincidence veto reduces backgrounds to < O(1) event/yr, or provide a target rejection factor.
  2. [Eq. (4) and finite-size effects] The derivation uses an infinite, undamped Luttinger liquid with S_1D ∝ δ(ω − v|q|). For the assumed 10 μm tube length, the mode spacing is ħπv/L ~ 0.5 meV for v ~ 2.5×10^6 m/s, comparable to the lower threshold E_th = 0.5 meV. The continuous-delta approximation should be checked against discrete-mode sums near threshold; a brief comment would suffice.
  3. [Acknowledgments] The name "Tracy Slayter" appears to be a typo for "Tracy Slatyer."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Luttinger-liquid structure factor is derived from the stated 1D Hamiltonian by bosonization, and the sensitivity curves are projections using benchmark parameters, not fits to DM data.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The central response function, S_1D(q,ω)=g|q|δ(ω−v|q|), is obtained by bosonizing the explicitly written 1D Hamiltonian (Eqs. 1–2), with g and v defined algebraically in terms of v_F, g2, and g4; no DM data are used and no quantity is fitted to the target result. The 3D structure factor is constructed from an explicitly stated transverse profile ansatz, f⊥(r⊥,θ)=δ(r⊥−r0)/(2πr0), giving F⊥(q⊥)=J0(q⊥r0); this is a modeling assumption, not an input secretly equal to the output. The scattering rate (Eq. 6) then evaluates this structure factor with standard halo parameters, benchmark g values, and reference thresholds; the sensitivity curves are projections for assumed exposures and backgrounds, not fits. Citations to QCD [39] and SQUAT [40,52,65] are external experimental developments by other groups, and no load-bearing argument reduces to a self-citation. The impedance-matching and plasmon-to-quasiparticle-conversion concerns raised in the skeptic summary are engineering feasibility risks, not circularity, and the paper itself explicitly flags them as requiring dedicated development. Thus the paper contains no prediction that is equivalent by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles or forces. Its free parameters are engineering benchmarks (thresholds, tube length, g range) rather than DM-fit parameters. The key assumptions are: (1) standard bosonization, (2) factorized 3D structure factor, (3) unproven plasmon-to-quasiparticle conversion, (4) background-free operation. The first two are standard; the last two are the fragile parts.

free parameters (5)
  • Luttinger parameter g = 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7
    Not fitted to DM data, but chosen as benchmark range from prior experimental/theoretical estimates for CNTs (Refs [22,56,59]). The sensitivity curves depend strongly on g, which must ultimately be measured for the fabricated sample.
  • Fermi velocity v_F = 0.8e6 m/s
    Standard value for metallic CNTs; sets the plasmon velocity and hence the wavelength/threshold kinematics.
  • Energy thresholds E_th = 6 meV, 0.5 meV
    Motivated by QCD (demonstrated 6 meV) and SQUAT (optimistic 0.5 meV) readouts; free parameters in the sense that the detector concept depends on them.
  • CNT radius r0 = ~0.6-0.85 nm (diameter 1.2-1.7 nm)
    Appears in the Bessel function form factor F_perp(q_perp) = J0(q_perp r0); chosen from commercial SWCNT diameters.
  • Accumulated nanotube length L_CNT = 1e8 m
    Corresponds to mg-scale target; drives the overall rate scale. This is an assumed engineering target, not a measured quantity.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Standard bosonization: 1D interacting electron gas with linear dispersion maps to free bosons; the density-density correlator is S_1D(q,omega) = g|q| delta(omega - v|q|).
    Well-established in condensed matter; the End Matter provides a derivation (Eqs. 7-31). Relies on linear dispersion, short-range interactions, and low-energy limit.
  • domain assumption Dark matter couples to the electron density via a Yukawa potential, and the rate factorizes as |V(q)|^2 S(q,omega).
    Standard for DM-electron scattering (Refs [10,47-49]).
  • domain assumption The 3D structure factor factorizes: S_3D(q,omega) = |F_perp(q_perp)|^2 S_1D(q_parallel,omega), with F_perp = J0(q_perp r0).
    Assumes a delta-function transverse density profile and no coupling between transverse and longitudinal response. This is an idealization.
  • domain assumption Standard Halo Model velocity distribution with v0=220 km/s, vesc=550 km/s, vE=232 km/s.
    Completely standard in the field; quoted from Refs [4,6,50,51].
  • ad hoc to paper The detector readout can convert CNT plasmon energy into quasiparticles with sufficient efficiency; the sensor thresholds are 6 meV and 0.5 meV.
    The paper states 'neither QCD nor SQUAT was designed to couple directly with plasmon modes' and 'achieving both efficient impedance matching and a large plasmon-to-quasiparticle conversion efficiency will require dedicated detector-development and characterization efforts.' This is the load-bearing technological assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper Background-free experiment at 95% CL; backgrounds reducible to negligible.
    The paper asserts thermal backgrounds are negligible at 50 mK, but quotes an 8 kHz quasiparticle tunneling rate for QCD. The background-free assumption is optimistic without a demonstrated background-rejection scheme.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 1D Luttinger Modes in Carbon Nanotubes as keV Dark Matter Detector." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBR2JTMA

@misc{pith2026260715338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 1D Luttinger Modes in Carbon Nanotubes as keV Dark Matter Detector},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBR2JTMA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.15338}
}
abstract

We propose metallic carbon nanotubes (CNTs) as a one-dimensional plasmon target for light dark matter (DM) direct detection. Unlike conventional gapless electronic targets, where DM primarily excites electron-hole pairs, the low-energy charge response of a metallic CNT is carried by a collective Luttinger-liquid mode. We compute the projected sensitivity for DM-electron scattering through heavy and light mediators, using benchmark thresholds motivated by quantum-capacitance-detector-like and superconducting-quasiparticle-amplifying-transmon-like readout. For an accumulated nanotube length $L_{\text{CNT}}=10^8{\rm m}$, corresponding to milligram-scale single-wall CNT targets, we find competitive reach in the keV--MeV mass range. In the light-mediator case, the projected sensitivity can probe the cosmologically motivated freeze-in benchmark at keV masses. We also show that the one-dimensional geometry of aligned CNTs induces sidereal-day modulation, providing a handle for distinguishing a DM signal from approximately time-independent sensor backgrounds. These results establish one-dimensional collective modes as a new target class for sub-MeV DM detection. Existing progress in scalable CNT synthesis and superconducting quasiparticle sensing provides a promising experimental foundation, while realizing the proposed detector will require dedicated development of CNT--superconductor coupling and plasmon-to-quasiparticle conversion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.15338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the proposed CNT detector architecture. Each [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Projected sensitivity of a CNT Luttinger-liquid DM detector to DM–electron scattering. The left panel shows the heavy-mediator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Daily modulation of the CNT Luttinger-liquid scattering rate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Andernach and F

    H. Andernach and F. Zwicky, English and spanish translation of zwicky’s (1933) the redshift of extragalactic nebulae (2017), arXiv:1711.01693 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 1933

  2. [2]

    V . C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., and N. Thonnard, Rotational prop- erties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., Astrophys. J.238, 471 (1980)

    1980

  3. [3]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper, History of dark matter, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 (2018)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.045002 2018

  4. [4]

    Drukier and L

    A. Drukier and L. Stodolsky, Principles and applications of a neutral-current detector for neutrino physics and astronomy, 6 Phys. Rev. D30, 2295 (1984)

    1984

  5. [5]

    M. W. Goodman and E. Witten, Detectability of certain dark- matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D31, 3059 (1985)

    1985

  6. [6]

    A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, and D. N. Spergel, Detecting cold dark-matter candidates, Phys. Rev. D33, 3495 (1986)

    1986

  7. [7]

    Z. Bo, W. Chen, X. Chen, Y . Chen, Z. Cheng, X. Cui, Y . Fan, D. Fang, Z. Gao, L. Geng, K. Giboni, X. Guo, X. Guo, Z. Guo, C. Han, K. Han, C. He, J. He, D. Huang, H. Huang, J. Huang, R. Hou, Y . Hou, X. Ji, X. Ji, Y . Ju, C. Li, J. Li, M. Li, S. Li, T. Li, Z. Li, Q. Lin, J. Liu, C. Lu, X. Lu, L. Luo, Y . Luo, W. Ma, Y . Ma, Y . Mao, Y . Meng, X. Ning, B. ...

    2025

  8. [8]

    Aalbers, D

    J. Aalbers, D. Akerib, A. A. Musalhi, F. Alder, C. Amarasinghe, A. Ames, T. Anderson, N. Angelides, H. Ara´ujo, J. Armstrong, M. Arthurs, A. Baker, S. Balashov, J. Bang, J. Bargemann, E. Barillier, D. Bauer, K. Beattie, T. Benson, A. Bhatti, A. Biek- ert, T. Biesiadzinski, H. Birch, E. Bishop, G. Blockinger, B. Boxer, C. Brew, P. Br´as, S. Burdin, M. Buuc...

    2025

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Aprile, J

    E. Aprile, J. Aalbers, K. Abe, S. Ahmed Maouloud, L. Al- thueser, B. Andrieu, E. Angelino, D. Ant ´on Martin, S. Arm- bruster, F. Arneodo, L. Baudis, M. Bazyk, L. Bellagamba, R. Biondi, A. Bismark, K. Boese, A. Brown, G. Bruno, R. Bud- nik, C. Cai, C. Capelli, J. Cardoso, A. C...

    2025

  2. [10]

    Essig, M

    R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. V olan- sky, and T.-T. Yu, Direct detection of sub-gev dark matter with semiconductor targets (2016), arXiv:1509.01598 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Hochberg, T

    Y . Hochberg, T. Lin, and K. M. Zurek, Detecting ultralight bosonic dark matter via absorption in superconductors, Phys- ical Review D94, 10.1103/physrevd.94.015019 (2016)

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Knapen, T

    S. Knapen, T. Lin, M. Pyle, and K. M. Zurek, Detection of light dark matter with optical phonons in polar materials, Physics Letters B785, 386–390 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Hochberg, I

    Y . Hochberg, I. Charaev, S.-W. Nam, V . Verma, M. Colangelo, and K. K. Berggren, Detecting sub-gev dark matter with super- conducting nanowires, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 151802 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Baudis, A

    L. Baudis, A. Bismark, N. Brugger, C. Capelli, I. Charaev, J. C. Garc´ıa, G. D. Hadas, Y . Hochberg, J. K. Hohmann, A. Kavner, C. Koos, A. Kuzmin, B. V . Lehmann, S. N ¨ageli, T. Neupert, B. Penning, D. R. Garc ´ıa, and A. Schilling, First sub-mev dark matter search with the q...

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y . Hochberg, Y . Kahn, M. Lisanti, K. M. Zurek, A. G. Grushin, R. Ilan, S. M. Griffin, Z.-F. Liu, S. F. Weber, and J. B. Neaton, Detection of sub-mev dark matter with three-dimensional dirac 7 materials, Physical Review D97, 10.1103/physrevd.97.015004 (2018)

    2018 doi

  8. [17]

    A. Das, J. Jang, and H. Min, Sub-mev dark matter detection with bilayer graphene (2024), arXiv:2312.00866 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Sherpa, A

    R. Sherpa, A. Sarkar, T. N. Maity, P. Dutta, R. Laha, and A. Das, Dive deeper with submarine: Sub-mev dark matter direct detec- tion using bilayer graphene (2026), arXiv:2604.21969 [hep-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Tremaine and J

    S. Tremaine and J. E. Gunn, Dynamical role of light neutral leptons in cosmology, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 407 (1979)

    1979

  11. [20]

    Haldane, ’luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quan- tum fluids

    F. Haldane, ’luttinger liquid theory’ of one-dimensional quan- tum fluids. i. properties of the luttinger model and their exten- sion to the general 1d interacting spinless fermi gas, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics14, 2585 (1981)

    1981

  12. [21]

    V oit, One-dimensional fermi liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977–1116 (1995)

    J. V oit, One-dimensional fermi liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics58, 977–1116 (1995)

    1995

  13. [22]

    C. Kane, L. Balents, and M. P. A. Fisher, Coulomb interactions and mesoscopic effects in carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5086 (1997)

    1997

  14. [23]

    Egger and A

    R. Egger and A. O. Gogolin, Effective low-energy theory for correlated carbon nanotubes, Physical Review Letters79, 5082–5085 (1997)

    1997

  15. [24]

    Egger and A

    R. Egger and A. Gogolin, Correlated transport and non-fermi- liquid behavior in single-wall carbon nanotubes, The European Physical Journal B3, 281–300 (1998)

    1998

  16. [25]

    Egger, A

    R. Egger, A. Bachtold, M. Fuhrer, M. Bockrath, D. Cobden, and P. McEuen, Luttinger liquid behavior in metallic carbon nan- otubes (2000), arXiv:cond-mat/0008008 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2000 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Ishii, H

    H. Ishii, H. Kataura, H. Shiozawa, H. Yoshioka, H. Otsubo, Y . Takayama, T. Miyahara, S. Suzuki, Y . Achiba, M. Nakatake, T. Narimura, M. Higashiguchi, K. Shimada, H. Namatame, and M. Taniguchi, Direct observation of tomonaga-luttinger-liquid state in carbon nanotubes at low t...

    2004

  18. [27]

    Imambekov, T

    A. Imambekov, T. L. Schmidt, and L. I. Glazman, One- dimensional quantum liquids: Beyond the luttinger liquid paradigm, Reviews of Modern Physics84, 1253–1306 (2012)

    2012

  19. [28]

    Z. Shi, X. Hong, H. Bechtel, B. Zeng, M. Martin, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, Y .-R. Shen, and F. Wang, Observation of a luttinger-liquid plasmon in metallic single-walled carbon nan- otubes, Nature Photonics9(2015)

    2015

  20. [29]

    Coskuner, A

    A. Coskuner, A. Mitridate, A. Olivares, and K. M. Zurek, Di- rectional dark matter detection in anisotropic dirac materials, Phys. Rev. D103, 016006 (2021)

    2021

  21. [30]

    C. Boyd, Y . Hochberg, Y . Kahn, E. D. Kramer, N. Kurinsky, B. V . Lehmann, and T. C. Yu, Directional detection of dark matter with anisotropic response functions, Phys. Rev. D108, 015015 (2023)

    2023

  22. [31]

    Zhang, J.-Q

    Q. Zhang, J.-Q. Huang, M.-Q. Zhao, W.-Z. Qian, and F. Wei, Carbon nanotube mass production: Principles and processes, ChemSusChem4, 864 (2011), https://chemistry- europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cssc.201100177

    2011 doi

  23. [32]

    J. S. Walker, J. A. Fagan, A. J. Biacchi, V . A. Kuehl, T. A. Sear- les, A. R. Hight Walker, and W. D. Rice, Global alignment of solution-based single-wall carbon nanotube films via machine- vision controlled filtration, Nano Letters19, 7256–7264 (2019)

    2019

  24. [33]

    Hughes, K

    K. Hughes, K. Iyer, R. Bird, J. Ivanov, S. Banerjee, G. Georges, and Q. Zhou, Review of carbon nanotube research and develop- ment: Materials and emerging applications, ACS Applied Nano Materials7(2024)

    2024

  25. [34]

    NanoIntegris, 2020 Product Catalog,https:// nanointegris.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/ 03/NanoIntegrisCatalog_2020.pdf(2020), ac- cessed: 2026-06-11

    2020

  26. [35]

    NanoIntegris, Metallic SWNTs (IsoNanotubes-M), https://nanointegris.com/our-products/ metallic-swnts-isonanotubes-m/, accessed: 2026-06-11

    2026

  27. [36]

    750530,https://www.sigmaaldrich

    Sigma-Aldrich, Carbon nanotube, single-walled, 98% metallic, product no. 750530,https://www.sigmaaldrich. com/US/en/product/aldrich/750530, accessed: 2026-06-11

    2026

  28. [37]

    Raymor Industries, Metallic Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes / m-SWCNT,https://raymor.com/our-products/ isonanotubes-m/, accessed: 2026-06-11

    2026

  29. [38]

    graphenea.com/pages/graphene-properties, accessed: 2026-06-11

    Graphenea, Properties of Graphene,https://www. graphenea.com/pages/graphene-properties, accessed: 2026-06-11

    2026

  30. [39]

    P. M. Echternach, B. J. Pepper, T. Reck, and C. M. Bradford, Single photon detection of 1.5 THz radiation with the quantum capacitance detector, Nature Astronomy2, 90 (2018)

    2018

  31. [40]

    C. Fink, C. Salemi, B. Young, D. Schuster, and N. Kurin- sky, Superconducting quasiparticle-amplifying transmon: A qubit-based sensor for mev-scale phonons and single tera- hertz photons, Physical Review Applied22, 10.1103/physre- vapplied.22.054009 (2024)

    2024 doi

  32. [41]

    Dvorkin, T

    C. Dvorkin, T. Lin, and K. Schutz, Cosmology of sub-mev dark matter freeze-in, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 111301 (2021)

    2021

  33. [42]

    S ´en´echal, An introduction to bosonization (1999), arXiv:cond-mat/9908262

    D. S ´en´echal, An introduction to bosonization (1999), arXiv:cond-mat/9908262

    1999 arXiv

  34. [43]

    von Delft and H

    J. von Delft and H. Schoeller, Bosoniza- tion for beginners — refermionization for ex- perts, Annalen der Physik510, 225 (1998), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.19985100401

    1998 doi

  35. [44]

    Fradkin,Field theories of condensed matter physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2013)

    E. Fradkin,Field theories of condensed matter physics(Cam- bridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  36. [45]

    Maniwa, R

    Y . Maniwa, R. Fujiwara, H. Kira, H. Tou, H. Kataura, S. Suzuki, Y . Achiba, E. Nishibori, M. Takata, M. Sakata, A. Fujiwara, and H. Suematsu, Thermal expansion of single-walled carbon nanotube (swnt) bundles: X-ray diffraction studies, Phys. Rev. B64, 241402(R) (2001)

    2001

  37. [46]

    Hamley and V

    I. Hamley and V . Castelletto, Small-angle scattering techniques for peptide and peptide hybrid nanostructures and peptide- based biomaterials, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 318, 102959 (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    Trickle, Z

    T. Trickle, Z. Zhang, K. M. Zurek, K. Inzani, and S. M. Grif- fin, Multi-channel direct detection of light dark matter: the- oretical framework, Journal of High Energy Physics2020, 10.1007/jhep03(2020)036 (2020)

    2020 doi

  39. [48]

    Hochberg, Y

    Y . Hochberg, Y . Kahn, N. Kurinsky, B. V . Lehmann, T. C. Yu, and K. K. Berggren, Determining dark-matter–electron scatter- ing rates from the dielectric function, Physical Review Letters 127, 10.1103/physrevlett.127.151802 (2021)

    2021 doi

  40. [49]

    Knapen, J

    S. Knapen, J. Kozaczuk, and T. Lin, Dark matter-electron scat- tering in dielectrics, Physical Review D104, 10.1103/phys- revd.104.015031 (2021)

    2021 doi

  41. [50]

    Roche, L

    C. Roche, L. Necib, T. Lin, X. Ou, and T. Nguyen, The Escape Velocity Profile of the Milky Way from Gaia DR3, Astrophys. J.972, 70 (2024), arXiv:2402.00108 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Freese, J

    K. Freese, J. Frieman, and A. Gould, Signal modulation in cold- dark-matter detection, Phys. Rev. D37, 3388 (1988)

    1988

  43. [52]

    Magoon, T

    H. Magoon, T. Aralis, T. Dyson, J. Anczarski, D. Baxter, G. Bratrud, R. Carpenter, S. Condon, A. Droster, E. Figueroa- Feliciano, C. W. Fink, S. Harvey, A. Simchony, Z. J. Smith, S. Stevens, N. Tabassum, B. A. Young, C. P. Salemi, 8 K. Stifter, D. I. Schuster, and N. A. Kurins...

    2026

  44. [53]

    Ramanathan, B

    K. Ramanathan, B. J. Sandoval, J. E. Parker, L. M. Joshi, A. D. Beyer, P. M. Echternach, S. Rosenblum, and S. R. Gol- wala, Quantum parity detectors: a qubit based particle detec- tion scheme with mev thresholds for rare-event searches (2026), arXiv:2405.17192 [physics.ins-det]

    2026 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Ranjan, G

    V . Ranjan, G. Puebla-Hellmann, M. Jung, T. Hasler, A. Nunnenkamp, M. Muoth, C. Hierold, A. Wallraff, and C. Sch ¨onenberger, Clean carbon nanotubes coupled to super- conducting impedance-matching circuits, Nature Communica- tions6, 10.1038/ncomms8165 (2015)

    2015 doi

  46. [55]

    Mergenthaler, A

    M. Mergenthaler, A. Nersisyan, A. Patterson, M. Espos- ito, A. Baumgartner, C. Sch ¨onenberger, G. A. D. Briggs, E. A. Laird, and P. J. Leek, Circuit quantum electrodynamics with carbon-nanotube-based superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Appl.15, 064050 (2021)

    2021

  47. [56]

    J. D. Chudow, C. B. McKitterick, D. E. Prober, D. F. Santavicca, and P. Kim, Terahertz Detection as a Probe of Luttinger-Liquid Behavior in an Individual Single-Walled Car- bon Nanotube, inAPS March Meeting Abstracts, APS Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 2013 (2013) p. N8.001

    2013

  48. [57]

    P. J. Burke, Luttinger liquid theory as a model of the gigahertz electrical properties of carbon nanotubes, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology1, 129 (2002)

    2002

  49. [58]

    P. J. Burke, An rf circuit model for carbon nanotubes, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology2, 55 (2003)

    2003

  50. [59]

    Bockrath, D

    M. Bockrath, D. H. Cobden, J. Lu, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smal- ley, L. Balents, and P. L. McEuen, Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes, Nature397, 598–601 (1999)

    1999

  51. [60]

    Catena and P

    R. Catena and P. Ullio, A novel determination of the local dark matter density, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2010(08), 004–004

    2010

  52. [61]

    P. F. de Salas and A. Widmark, Dark matter local density deter- mination: recent observations and future prospects, Reports on Progress in Physics84, 104901 (2021)

    2021

  53. [62]

    Mei and A

    D.-M. Mei and A. Hime, Muon-induced background study for underground laboratories, Phys. Rev. D73, 053004 (2006)

    2006

  54. [63]

    X. Li, J. Wang, Y .-Y . Jiang, G.-M. Xue, X. Cai, J. Zhou, M. Gong, Z.-F. Liu, S.-Y . Zheng, D.-K. Ma, M. Chen, W.-J. Sun, S. Yang, F. Yan, Y .-R. Jin, S. P. Zhao, X.-F. Ding, and H.- F. Yu, Cosmic-ray-induced correlated errors in superconducting qubit array, Nature Communicat...

    2025 doi

  55. [64]

    D. S. Akerib, A. K. A. Musalhi, F. Alder, B. J. Almquist, C. S. Amarasinghe, A. Ames, T. J. Anderson, N. Angelides, H. M. Ara´ujo, J. E. Armstrong, M. Arthurs, A. Baker, S. Balashov, J. Bang, J. W. Bargemann, E. E. Barillier, K. Beattie, A. Bhatti, T. P. Biesiadzinski, H. J. B...

    2026

  56. [65]

    Aralis, SQUATs: Qubit-based sensors for dark matter, Pre- sentation at Superconducting Technologies for Dark Matter, Rome, Italy (2026), preliminary results

    T. Aralis, SQUATs: Qubit-based sensors for dark matter, Pre- sentation at Superconducting Technologies for Dark Matter, Rome, Italy (2026), preliminary results

    2026

  57. [66]

    J. D. Lewin and P. F. Smith, Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astroparticle Physics6, 87 (1996)

    1996

  58. [67]

    M. C. Smith, G. R. Ruchti, A. Helmi, R. F. G. Wyse, J. P. Fulbright, K. C. Freeman, J. F. Navarro, G. M. Seabroke, M. Steinmetz, M. Williams, O. Bienayme, J. Binney, J. Bland- Hawthorn, W. Dehnen, B. K. Gibson, G. Gilmore, E. K. Grebel, U. Munari, Q. A. Parker, R.-D. Scholz, A...

    2007

  59. [68]

    C.-H. Liu, D. C. Harrison, S. Patel, C. D. Wilen, O. Raf- ferty, A. Shearrow, A. Ballard, V . Iaia, J. Ku, B. L. T. Plourde, and R. McDermott, Quasiparticle poisoning of superconduct- ing qubits from resonant absorption of pair-breaking photons (2022), arXiv:2203.06577 [quant-...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.