Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 66 references

Two-loop photon self-energies in hot QCD give the same hard-photon rates as kinetic theory, including finite beyond-log terms.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:05 UTC pith:WC6JNCP6

load-bearing objection Solid two-loop imaginary-time derivation that recovers the known Kapusta/Baier LL+BLL hard-photon rates; methodological confirmation, not a rate change. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.24950 v1 pith:WC6JNCP6 submitted 2026-07-27 hep-ph nucl-th

Beyond leading-logarithm photon production from two-loop diagrams in a hot QCD medium

Sumit , Ritesh Ghosh , Munshi G. Mustafa This is my paper
classification hep-ph nucl-th
keywords Quark-gluon plasmaThermal photonsPhoton self-energyFinite-temperature field theoryQCDLeading logarithmBeyond leading logarithmHard thermal loop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

High-energy photons escaping a quark-gluon plasma carry information about the medium because they leave without further scattering. Their emission rate equals the imaginary part of the photon self-energy. This paper evaluates that imaginary part from the two-loop self-energy diagrams in thermal QCD using the imaginary-time formalism, and extracts both the leading-logarithmic piece and the constant terms that sit beside the logarithm. Topology I produces the familiar Compton and annihilation channels; topology II contributes nothing to the on-shell 2-to-2 rate but is required for the Ward identity. After the soft region is regulated by hard-thermal-loop resummation, the total rate matches the classic kinetic-theory expressions, including the same finite constants. The calculation therefore supplies an independent field-theoretic confirmation that the two approaches are equivalent at this order.

Core claim

The imaginary part of the two-loop photon self-energy in thermal QCD yields analytical hard-photon production rates that agree with kinetic theory for both Compton and annihilation processes at leading-log and beyond-leading-log accuracy. After combining with the infrared-regulated soft contribution, the total rate is (5 α α_s / 18 π²) T² e^{-E/T} [ln(4ET/M_∞²) + (1/3)ln 2 − 1/2 − γ_E + ζ'(2)/ζ(2)]. Topology II vanishes for on-shell 2↔2 kinematics.

What carries the argument

Imaginary part of the two-loop photon self-energy (topologies I and II) evaluated via Matsubara sums and Cutkosky cuts in the imaginary-time formalism; the resulting discontinuities are reduced to phase-space integrals that isolate the leading logarithm and the accompanying finite constants.

Load-bearing premise

Hard incoming thermal distributions are replaced by Maxwell–Boltzmann exponentials so the energy integrals can be done in closed form; that replacement is justified only when the hard-photon hierarchy holds.

What would settle it

Recompute the same two-loop imaginary part without the Maxwell–Boltzmann replacement (or with exact Fermi/Bose factors throughout phase space) and check whether the finite constants beside the logarithm still match the known kinetic-theory values.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Field-theoretic and kinetic-theory routes to hard thermal photons are interchangeable at two-loop order once soft modes are HTL-regulated.
  • Topology II can be omitted from rate calculations but must be retained whenever gauge invariance or the Ward identity is checked.
  • The analytic BLL constants provide a fixed benchmark for future lattice or higher-loop photon-rate computations.
  • The same self-energy machinery can be reused for virtual photons (dileptons) at the corresponding kinematic point.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the finite constants are now under analytic control, residual discrepancies between photon spectra and hydrodynamic models can be attributed to medium evolution or higher-order effects rather than to an incomplete hard rate.
  • Extending the identical cut analysis to three-loop topologies would test whether the pattern of vanishing versus non-vanishing diagrams persists beyond leading order.
  • The explicit cancellation of the intermediate cutoff between hard and soft pieces offers a concrete template for regulating other infrared-sensitive electromagnetic probes in the plasma.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The authors compute the imaginary part of the two-loop photon self-energy in thermal QCD within the imaginary-time (Saclay) formalism, for the two topologies of Fig. 2/Fig. 4. For topology I they reduce the cuts to the three physical 2↔2 channels (Compton and annihilation), perform the radial thermal integrals analytically under a Maxwell–Boltzmann replacement for the hard incoming distributions, define an exact hard domain via the virtuality cut 4ℓ(k−ℓ) ≥ k_c² (Eq. (63)), and extract both the leading-logarithmic and the finite (BLL) pieces of the hard-photon rate. Topology II is shown to give zero for the on-shell 2↔2 sector (Eqs. (137)–(143)), and Appendix E verifies the Ward identity diagram by diagram. Adding the HTL soft rate (Eq. (151)) cancels k_c and yields Eq. (153), E dR/d⁴xd³p = (5αα_s/18π²)T²e^{−E/T}[ln(4ET/M∞²) + (1/3)ln2 − 1/2 − γ_E + ζ′(2)/ζ(2)], in agreement with the kinetic-theory results of Refs. [1,2].

Significance. The final rate, including the constant (1/3)ln2 − 1/2 − γ_E + ζ′(2)/ζ(2), is the classic Kapusta–Lichard–Seibert/Baier et al. result, so the rate itself is not new. The contribution is methodological and confirmatory: this is, to my knowledge, the first fully analytic derivation of the hard-photon rate at beyond-leading-log accuracy directly from the two-loop photon self-energy, providing an independent field-theoretic confirmation of the kinetic-theory route. The manuscript is unusually transparent: the Saclay r₀-sums (Eqs. (9a)–(9b)), the full k₀ residue tables (Apps. A and C), the imaginary-part identities (Apps. B and D), the reduction from six cuts to three via momentum relabeling (Eqs. (123)–(125)), the exact hard-domain operator P_h (Eq. (63)) with explicit boundary-error estimates (Eqs. (76)–(81), (99)–(101)), and the Ward-identity check (App. E) are all written out, which makes the calculation auditable and reproducible. The clean demonstration that topology II vanishes for P²=0 while remaining essential for gauge invariance is a nice structural result. Given the load-bearing role of this rate in phenomenology, an independent confirmation at O(1) accuracy is a useful, if增量

major comments (2)
  1. [§III.C–III.D, Eq. (151) vs. §II.A.2, Eqs. (63)–(105)] The finite constant in Eq. (153) is obtained by adding the log-only soft rate Eq. (151), imported from Refs. [1,2], to the hard piece whose constant is extracted after replacing the exact hard boundary 4ℓ(k−ℓ) ≥ k_c² by kinematic boundaries, with discarded pieces estimated as O(pa ln(T/√a)), O(aT ln(p²/a)) (Eqs. (78)–(81), (99)–(101)). These estimates show the corrections vanish as k_c→0, but in the matching k_c is a finite separator, and no soft-side finite constant computed with the same cutoff prescription is displayed. Scheme-independence of the O(1) term therefore rests on the external result rather than on an argument within the paper. Please add a short error budget (e.g., the relative accuracy of Eq. (153) in powers of k_c/T and M∞/k_c) or a demonstration that the HTL soft integral with the identical virtuality cutoff contributes no finite k_c-dependent piece at retained accuracy
  2. [§II.A, after Eq. (29); Eqs. (33)–(39)] The Maxwell–Boltzmann replacements n_B(E_g)≃e^{−βE_g} and n_F(E_q)≃e^{−βE_q} are applied pointwise, but in channels 2–3 the phase space includes regions where E_q = p−k+2ℓ is of order ℓ ∼ T (k near the upper kinematic boundary), where n_F(E_q) differs from e^{−βE_q} by an O(1) factor. The subsequent exact identities (e.g., e^{−βr}(1−n_F(r))=n_F(r)) remove part of the sensitivity but not the error in the replaced factors themselves. Since the kinetic-theory comparison [1,2] uses the same replacement, the claimed agreement is internally consistent, but the absolute accuracy of the finite constant is not quantified here. Please estimate the contribution of the E_q ≲ T corner of the (ℓ,k) domain to the constant in Eqs. (148)–(150), or state explicitly why it lies beyond the retained accuracy.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Eq. (3)] The factor 5/9 introduced in Eq. (3) corresponds to Σ_f q_f² for N_f=2 (u,d); please state the flavor content explicitly, since the prefactors of Eqs. (145)–(153) depend on it.
  2. [Introduction, paragraph after Eq. (2)] The sentence 'the two-loop diagrams have earlier been used in different contexts, viz., to obtain the imaginary part and regulate the infrared divergences of two-loop vector boson self-energies semi-analytically in thermal QCD' carries no citation; presumably Ref. [57] is meant.
  3. [Eq. (1)] Please state the retarded prescription and sign convention in Eq. (1); many references write the rate with an explicit minus sign, and ℑΠ^I_µ is negative in Eq. (15), so the convention should be unambiguous.
  4. [§II.B, Eqs. (140)–(143)] The vanishing of B^II_{1,2,3} at P²=0 (Eq. (142)) is shown 'at fixed nonsingular kinematics'; a brief comment that the potentially singular collinear regions (∆_i → 0 or x → (E_q ∓ E_g)²) do not generate distribution-valued contributions for the on-shell photon would close the argument.
  5. [§II.A.2 and §III.B, Eqs. (148)–(150)] The label 'BLL' denotes the LL plus the accompanying constant rather than a correction beyond the log; a clarifying remark (or 'leading order in the hard expansion') would avoid confusion.
  6. [§IV, Conclusions] The statement 'The second way has not been used before' is too strong in view of Refs. [57] and [3, 32], which evaluate two-loop self-energy discontinuities in related contexts; please temper it to specify what is new (the analytic BLL extraction for on-shell photons).
  7. [Various] Minor typos: the propagator definition after Eq. (3) is garbled ('S(X) = i/X'); 'Eq. 1' should be 'Eq. (1)' in §II.B; the definition M_∞ = √(2(m_q^th)²) in §III.C is unusually written (presumably √2 m_q^th).
  8. [Appendices A–D] Given the length of the residue tables in Apps. A–D, a symbolic-algebra cross-check (or a numerical spot-check of a few of the (A3) and (D3) identities) deposited as supplementary material would further strengthen the reproducibility the authors emphasize; optional.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: two-loop Im Π is computed independently and cross-checked against external kinetic-theory rates.

full rationale

The paper evaluates the imaginary part of two-loop photon self-energies (topologies I and II) in the imaginary-time formalism, reduces the Matsubara sums and cuts to Compton and annihilation phase space, and extracts LL and BLL hard rates analytically. Topology II is shown to vanish on-shell for 2↔2 cuts by P²=0, with a separate internal Ward-identity check. Comparison to Kapusta and Baier is an external cross-check, not an input: the matrix-element route is not fed into the self-energy calculation. The soft HTL piece and M_∞ are standard literature imports used only to cancel the intermediate cutoff k_c in the usual hard/soft split; no parameter is fitted to data, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz from the authors’ prior work forces the BLL constants. Maxwell–Boltzmann replacements for hard incoming distributions are approximations shared with the literature being checked, not circular definitions of the target rates. Concerns about whether the finite BLL constant is fully scheme-matched to the soft sector are correctness/completeness issues, not circular reductions of outputs to inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard thermal QCD perturbation theory in the hard-photon regime, plus the usual hard/soft split with HTL for soft quark exchange. No parameters are fitted to data; finite BLL numbers come from Bose/Fermi integrals. Invented entities are absent. The only paper-specific modeling choices are the MB approximation for hard legs and retention of only 2↔2 cuts from the two-loop topologies.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Imaginary-time thermal QCD with free (or HTL-resummed soft) propagators in Feynman gauge; photon rate given by E dR/d⁴x d³p = n_B(E) Im Π^μ_μ / (2π)³ to O(e²).
    Stated in §I Eqs. (1)–(2) and used throughout §II–III; standard optical theorem setup.
  • domain assumption Hard-photon hierarchy p ≫ T ≫ k_c with massless quarks and only leading 2↔2 Compton/annihilation cuts retained from two-loop diagrams.
    Imposed from §II.A phase-space reduction through §III; power-suppressed regions dropped.
  • ad hoc to paper Maxwell–Boltzmann replacement for hard incoming distribution products while keeping exact Pauli blocking for the outgoing fermion where needed.
    Introduced after Eq. (29) and analogs for channels 2–3, following Kapusta/Baier practice; essential for closed-form r-integrals.
  • domain assumption Soft region regulated by one-loop HTL quark propagator with asymptotic mass M_∞ = gT/√3; dressing one quark line suffices at this order.
    §III.C and Fig. 5; imported from Braaten–Pisarski / Kapusta / Baier without re-derivation.
  • standard math Contour integration / Saclay representation evaluates Matsubara sums; only poles corresponding to physical 2↔2 cuts are kept.
    Apps. A–D; standard finite-T technique (Pisarski, le Bellac).

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-grok45-kimik3 · 71015 in / 3234 out tokens · 76481 ms · 2026-07-31T05:05:42.960492+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate high-energy photon production from a quark-gluon plasma by evaluating the imaginary part of the two-loop photon self-energies in thermal QCD. Working within the imaginary-time formalism, we derive analytical expressions for both the leading-logarithmic and the beyond-leading-logarithmic contributions to the photon production rate. The rates obtained within the thermal field theoretical framework agree with those derived from kinetic theory calculations for the relevant photon-production processes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.24950 by Munshi G. Mustafa, Ritesh Ghosh, Sumit.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The optical theorem in thermal field theory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Two-loop Feynman diagrams contributing to the photon self-energy. The right panel (b) is obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Leading-order photon production processes: (a) Compton scattering, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Two-loop photon self-energy: Topology [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: One-loop photon self-energy in the HTL approximation. The internal quark line marked with a black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    J. I. Kapusta, P. Lichard, and D. Seibert, High-energy photons from quark - gluon plasma versus hot hadronic gas, Phys. Rev. D44, 2774 (1991), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 47, 4171 (1993)]. 40

    1991

  2. [2]

    N4a (k−E g −E r) + N4b (k+E r −E g) −2(E l −E g) # , C5 = H2 [W(−E g −E l)−W(−k)] E2q −(E l +E g)2

    Beyond leading-logarithmic contribution The leading-logarithmic calculation fixes only the coefficient of ln(4pT /k 2 c ). To obtain the complete result at leading order in the hard-photon limit, including the finite terms consisting of this logarithm, we retain the full thermal moments and the finite parts of the hard kernels. Throughout this subsection,...

  3. [3]

    Baier, H

    R. Baier, H. Nakkagawa, A. Niegawa, and K. Redlich, Production rate of hard thermal photons and screening of quark mass singularity, Z. Phys.C53, 433 (1992)

    1992

  4. [4]

    Aurenche, F

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, R. Kobes, and H. Zaraket, Bremsstrahlung and photon production in thermal QCD, Phys. Rev. D58, 085003 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9804224 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  5. [5]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Photon emission from ultrarelativistic plasmas, JHEP11, 057, arXiv:hep- ph/0109064

    arXiv

  6. [6]

    E. V. Shuryak, Quark-Gluon Plasma and Hadronic Production of Leptons, Photons and Psions, Phys. Lett. B78, 150 (1978)

    1978

  7. [7]

    Kajantie and H

    K. Kajantie and H. I. Miettinen, Temperature Measurement of Quark-Gluon Plasma Formed in High-Energy Nucleus- Nucleus Collisions, Z. Phys. C9, 341 (1981)

    1981

  8. [8]

    Halzen and H

    F. Halzen and H. C. Liu, Experimental Signatures of Phase Transition to Quark Matter in High-energy Collisions of Nuclei, Phys. Rev. D25, 1842 (1982)

    1982

  9. [9]

    Kajantie and P

    K. Kajantie and P. V. Ruuskanen, Shielding of Quark Mass Singularities in Photon Emission From Hot Quark - Gluon Plasma, Phys. Lett. B121, 352 (1983)

    1983

  10. [10]

    Sinha, Universal Signals of Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys

    B. Sinha, Universal Signals of Quark-Gluon Plasma, Phys. Lett. B128, 91 (1983)

    1983

  11. [11]

    R. C. Hwa and K. Kajantie, Diagnosing Quark Matter by Measuring the Total Entropy and the Photon Or Dilepton Emission Rates, Phys. Rev. D32, 1109 (1985)

    1985

  12. [12]

    Staadt, W

    G. Staadt, W. Greiner, and J. Rafelski, Photons From Strange Quark Annihilation in Quark - Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. D33, 66 (1986)

    1986

  13. [13]

    Neubert, Photon Production in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at 200-GeV/u, Z

    M. Neubert, Photon Production in Ultrarelativistic Heavy Ion Collisions at 200-GeV/u, Z. Phys. C42, 231 (1989)

    1989

  14. [14]

    J.-e. Alam, S. Raha, and B. Sinha, Electromagnetic probes of quark gluon plasma, Physics Reports273, 243 (1996)

    1996

  15. [15]

    Peitzmann and M

    T. Peitzmann and M. H. Thoma, Direct photons from relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rept.364, 175 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0111114

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  16. [16]

    Oliva, M

    L. Oliva, M. Ruggieri, S. Plumari, F. Scardina, G. X. Peng, and V. Greco, Photons from the Early Stages of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. C96, 014914 (2017), arXiv:1703.00116 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Iatrakis, E

    I. Iatrakis, E. Kiritsis, C. Shen, and D.-L. Yang, Holographic Photon Production in Heavy Ion Collisions, JHEP04, 035, arXiv:1609.07208 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Hauksson, S

    S. Hauksson, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Photon emission from quark-gluon plasma out of equilibrium, Phys. Rev. C97, 014901 (2018), arXiv:1709.03598 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    Sch¨ afer, J

    A. Sch¨ afer, J. M. Torres-Rincon, J. Rothermel, N. Ehlert, C. Gale, and H. Elfner (SMASH), Benchmarking a nonequilibrium approach to photon emission in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. D99, 114021 (2019), arXiv:1902.07564 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    van Hees, C

    H. van Hees, C. Gale, and R. Rapp, Thermal Photons and Collective Flow at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C84, 054906 (2011), arXiv:1108.2131 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    P. B. Arnold, G. D. Moore, and L. G. Yaffe, Photon emission from quark gluon plasma: Complete leading order results, JHEP0112, 009, arXiv:hep-ph/0111107 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    S. Ali, D. Bala, A. Francis, G. Jackson, O. Kaczmarek, J. Turnwald, T. Ueding, and N. Wink (HotQCD), Lattice QCD estimates of thermal photon production from the QGP, Phys. Rev. D110, 054518 (2024), arXiv:2403.11647 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    D. K. Srivastava, M. G. Mustafa, and B. Muller, Expanding quark - gluon plasmas: Transverse flow, chemical equili- bration and electromagnetic radiation, Phys.Rev.C56, 1064 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9611041 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  24. [24]

    Ghiglieri, J

    J. Ghiglieri, J. Hong, A. Kurkela, E. Lu, G. D. Moore, and D. Teaney, Next-to-leading order thermal photon production in a weakly coupled quark-gluon plasma, JHEP05, 010, arXiv:1302.5970 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Cleymans, J

    J. Cleymans, J. Fingberg, and K. Redlich, Transverse Momentum Distribution of Dileptons in Different Scenarios for the QCD Phase Transition, Phys. Rev.D35, 2153 (1987)

    1987

  26. [26]

    H. A. Weldon, Reformulation of finite temperature dilepton production, Phys. Rev. D42, 2384 (1990)

    1990

  27. [27]

    Braaten, R

    E. Braaten, R. D. Pisarski, and T.-C. Yuan, Production of Soft Dileptons in the Quark - Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2242 (1990)

    1990

  28. [28]

    M. G. Mustafa, A. Schafer, and M. H. Thoma, Nonperturbative dilepton production from a quark gluon plasma, Phys. Rev.C61, 024902 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908461 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    M. G. Mustafa and M. H. Thoma, Can Van Hove singularities be observed in relativistic heavy ion collisions?, Pramana 60, 711 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0201060 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    Mustafa, A

    M. Mustafa, A. Schafer, and M. Thoma, Gluon condensate, quark propagation, and dilepton production in the quark gluon plasma, Nucl. Phys.A661, 653 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9906391 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    Peshier and M

    A. Peshier and M. H. Thoma, Quark dispersion relation and dilepton production in the quark gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 841 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9907268 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  32. [32]

    Strickland, Thermal photons and dileptons from nonequilibrium quark - gluon plasma, Phys

    M. Strickland, Thermal photons and dileptons from nonequilibrium quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Lett. B331, 245 (1994)

    1994

  33. [33]

    Aurenche, F

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, R. Kobes, and H. Zaraket, Two loop Compton and annihilation processes in thermal QCD, Phys. Rev.D60, 076002 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9903307 [hep-ph]. 41

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  34. [34]

    M. H. Thoma and C. T. Traxler, Production of energetic dileptons with small invariant masses from the quark - gluon plasma, Phys. Rev.D56, 198 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9701354 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  35. [35]

    Aurenche, F

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, and H. Zaraket, Enhanced thermal production of hard dileptons by 3→2 processes, JHEP 0207, 063, arXiv:hep-ph/0204145 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  36. [36]

    Aurenche, F

    P. Aurenche, F. Gelis, G. Moore, and H. Zaraket, Landau-Pomeranchuk-Migdal resummation for dilepton production, JHEP0212, 006, arXiv:hep-ph/0211036 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Carrington, A

    M. Carrington, A. Gynther, and P. Aurenche, Energetic di-leptons from the Quark Gluon Plasma, Phys. Rev.D77, 045035 (2008), arXiv:0711.3943 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [38]

    Greiner, N

    C. Greiner, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa, and M. H. Thoma, Low Mass Dilepton Rate from the Deconfined Phase, Phys. Rev.C83, 014908 (2011), arXiv:1010.2169 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Bandyopadhyay, N

    A. Bandyopadhyay, N. Haque, M. G. Mustafa, and M. Strickland, Dilepton rate and quark number susceptibility with the Gribov action, Phys. Rev. D93, 065004 (2016), arXiv:1508.06249 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    B. S. Kasmaei and M. Strickland, Dilepton production and elliptic flow from an anisotropic quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D99, 034015 (2019), arXiv:1811.07486 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Wang and I

    X. Wang and I. A. Shovkovy, Photon and dilepton emission anisotropy for a magnetized quark-gluon plasma, Phys. Rev. D109, 056008 (2024), arXiv:2307.07557 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Churchill, L

    J. Churchill, L. Du, C. Gale, G. Jackson, and S. Jeon, Dilepton production at next-to-leading order and intermediate invariant-mass observables, Phys. Rev. C109, 044915 (2024), arXiv:2311.06675 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Braun-Munzinger, V

    P. Braun-Munzinger, V. Koch, T. Sch¨ afer, and J. Stachel, Properties of hot and dense matter from relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rept.621, 76 (2016), arXiv:1510.00442 [nucl-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [44]

    Busza, K

    W. Busza, K. Rajagopal, and W. van der Schee, Heavy Ion Collisions: The Big Picture, and the Big Questions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 339 (2018), arXiv:1802.04801 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    J. L. Nagle and W. A. Zajc, Small System Collectivity in Relativistic Hadronic and Nuclear Collisions, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.68, 211 (2018), arXiv:1801.03477 [nucl-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  46. [46]

    P. V. Ruuskanen, Photons and lepton pairs: The Deep probes of quark - gluon plasma, inNATO Advanced Study Institute on Particle Production in Highly Excited Matter(1992) pp. 593–613

    1992

  47. [47]

    Ruuskanen, Particle production in highly excited matter, (ed.: Hans h

    P. Ruuskanen, Particle production in highly excited matter, (ed.: Hans h. gutbrod and johann rafelski ((Plenum Press, New York, 1993))

    1993

  48. [48]

    P. V. Ruuskanen, Electromagnetic emission rates for the QCD plasma and heavy ion collisions, inMeeting Dedicated to Memory of Tanguy Altherr(1994) pp. 31–40

    1994

  49. [49]

    Feinberg, Direct production of photons and dileptons in thermodynamical models of multiple hadron production, Nuov

    E. Feinberg, Direct production of photons and dileptons in thermodynamical models of multiple hadron production, Nuov. Cim.A 34, 391?412 (1976)

    1976

  50. [50]

    L. D. McLerran and T. Toimela, Photon and dilepton emission from the quark-gluon plasma: Some general consider- ations, Phys. Rev. D31, 545 (1985)

    1985

  51. [51]

    Gale and J

    C. Gale and J. I. Kapusta, Vector dominance model at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys.B357, 65 (1991)

    1991

  52. [52]

    R. L. Kobes and G. W. Semenoff, Discontinuities of Green Functions in Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density, Nucl. Phys. B260, 714 (1985)

    1985

  53. [53]

    R. L. Kobes and G. W. Semenoff, Discontinuities of Green Functions in Field Theory at Finite Temperature and Density. 2, Nucl. Phys. B272, 329 (1986)

    1986

  54. [54]

    A. K. Das,Finite Temperature Field Theory(World Scientific, New York, 1997)

    1997

  55. [55]

    H. A. Weldon, Simple Rules for Discontinuities in Finite Temperature Field Theory, Phys. Rev. D28, 2007 (1983)

    2007

  56. [56]

    Gelis, Cutting rules in the real time formalisms at finite temperature, Nucl

    F. Gelis, Cutting rules in the real time formalisms at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B508, 483 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9701410

    arXiv 1997

  57. [57]

    Gale and J

    C. Gale and J. I. Kapusta, Dilepton radiation from high temperature nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C35, 2107 (1987)

    1987

  58. [58]

    Majumder and C

    A. Majumder and C. Gale, On the imaginary parts and infrared divergences of two loop vector boson selfenergies in thermal QCD, Phys. Rev. C65, 055203 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0111181

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [59]

    R. D. Pisarski, Computing Finite Temperature Loops with Ease, Nucl. Phys. B309, 476 (1988)

    1988

  60. [60]

    Haque and M

    N. Haque and M. G. Mustafa, Hard Thermal Loop—Theory and applications, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.140, 104136 (2025), arXiv:2404.08734 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Braaten and R

    E. Braaten and R. D. Pisarski, Soft Amplitudes in Hot Gauge Theories: A General Analysis, Nucl. Phys.B337, 569 (1990)

    1990

  62. [62]

    Haque, and B

    Sumit, N. Haque, and B. K. Patra, NLO quark self-energy and dispersion relation using the hard thermal loop resummation, JHEP05, 171, arXiv:2201.07173 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Braaten and T

    E. Braaten and T. C. Yuan, Calculation of screening in a hot plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 2183 (1991)

    1991

  64. [64]

    J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011

  65. [65]

    M. G. Mustafa, An introduction to thermal field theory and some of its application, Eur. Phys. J. ST232, 1369 (2023), arXiv:2207.00534 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    M. L. Bellac,Thermal Field Theory, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    2011