Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.18392 v3 pith:WEMGAX6T submitted 2024-05-28 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords trainingscalingacrosscosinedifferentlearningmodelscale
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Scale has become a main ingredient in obtaining strong machine learning models. As a result, understanding a model's scaling properties is key to effectively designing both the right training setup as well as future generations of architectures. In this work, we argue that scale and training research has been needlessly complex due to reliance on the cosine schedule, which prevents training across different lengths for the same model size. We investigate the training behavior of a direct alternative -- constant learning rate and cooldowns -- and find that it scales predictably and reliably similar to cosine. Additionally, we show that stochastic weight averaging yields improved performance along the training trajectory, without additional training costs, across different scales. Importantly, with these findings we demonstrate that scaling experiments can be performed with significantly reduced compute and GPU hours by utilizing fewer but reusable training runs. Our code is available at \url{https://github.com/epfml/schedules-and-scaling/}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Automated LLM Speedrunning Benchmark: Reproducing NanoGPT Improvements

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Frontier LLM agents recover at most 46% of the human speedup when asked to reimplement successive NanoGPT speedrun records, even with pseudocode, text, and mini-paper hints.

  2. Improving Neural Network Training by Decoupling the Magnitude and Direction of Weight Vectors

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Splitting weight matrices into a fixed-norm direction and learnable per-row/column magnitudes improves LLM training over AdamW/Muon, removes weight decay and warmup, and transfers the optimal LR across width.

  3. Is your batch size the problem? Revisiting the Adam-SGD gap in language modeling

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SGD with momentum can match Adam's performance in language modeling when trained with small batches and careful tuning, a result that contradicts several popular explanations for the optimizer gap.

  4. BioClinical ModernBERT: A State-of-the-Art Long-Context Encoder for Biomedical and Clinical NLP

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A continued-pretrained ModernBERT encoder for biomedical and clinical text claims SOTA on several clinical NLP tasks, with caveats about data overlap between pretraining and evaluation.

  5. Scaling Point-in-Time Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Scaling point-in-time LLMs to 4B parameters and 1T temporally filtered tokens narrows the gap to unrestricted models to about 8–11 average points and yields positive out-of-sample Sharpe ratios from news embeddings.

  6. AbbIE: Autoregressive Block-Based Iterative Encoder for Efficient Sequence Modeling

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An iterative Transformer that reuses its middle layers with an extra residual connection matches a standard Transformer after one pass and improves perplexity and zero-shot accuracy when run for more passes at test time.

  7. Analysis of Schedule-Free Nonconvex Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Lyapunov framework yields O(1/log T) and O(log T/T) gradient-norm rates for Schedule-Free on smooth nonconvex objectives, with the faster rate depending on an unproven assumption.

Pith tools