Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Error-tolerant witnessing of divergences in classical and quantum statistical complexity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1711.03661 v2 pith:WIV5QH7M submitted 2017-11-10 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumclassicalcomplexitydivergencesinformationprocessesstatisticalstochastic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

How much information do we need about a process' past to faithfully simulate its future? The statistical complexity is a prominent quantifier of structure for stochastic processes. Quantum machines, however, can simulate classical stochastic processes while storing significantly less information than their optimal classical counterparts. This implies qualitative divergences between classical and quantum statistical complexity. Here, we develop error-tolerant techniques to witness such divergences, enabling us to account for the inevitable imperfections in realising quantum stochastic simulators with present-day quantum technology. We apply these tools to experimentally verify the quantum memory advantage in simulating an Ising spin chain, even when accounting for experimental distortion. This then leads us to observe a recently conjectured effect, the ambiguity of simplicity$\unicode{x2013}$the notion that the relative complexity of two different processes can depend on whether we model the process using classical or quantum means of information processing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Quantum Agents Can Change Which Strategies Are More Complex

    quant-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Classical and quantum agents can rank the same two adaptive strategies in opposite order of memory-based complexity, and the paper provides sufficient conditions for when this happens.

Pith tools