REVIEW 1 cited by
Error-tolerant witnessing of divergences in classical and quantum statistical complexity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
How much information do we need about a process' past to faithfully simulate its future? The statistical complexity is a prominent quantifier of structure for stochastic processes. Quantum machines, however, can simulate classical stochastic processes while storing significantly less information than their optimal classical counterparts. This implies qualitative divergences between classical and quantum statistical complexity. Here, we develop error-tolerant techniques to witness such divergences, enabling us to account for the inevitable imperfections in realising quantum stochastic simulators with present-day quantum technology. We apply these tools to experimentally verify the quantum memory advantage in simulating an Ising spin chain, even when accounting for experimental distortion. This then leads us to observe a recently conjectured effect, the ambiguity of simplicity$\unicode{x2013}$the notion that the relative complexity of two different processes can depend on whether we model the process using classical or quantum means of information processing.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
How Quantum Agents Can Change Which Strategies Are More Complex
Classical and quantum agents can rank the same two adaptive strategies in opposite order of memory-based complexity, and the paper provides sufficient conditions for when this happens.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.