Energy Extraction and Evolution of Regular Black Holes: The Case of Bardeen Spacetime

Angel Rincon; Vitalii Vertogradov

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 4 cited by

Energy Extraction and Evolution of Regular Black Holes: The Case of Bardeen Spacetime

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a charged Penrose process can drain the magnetic charge that keeps a Bardeen regular black hole nonsingular, forcing the core curvature to grow without bound.

desk verdict Correct algebraic observation about the Bardeen metric, but the central claim that the charged Penrose process drains the magnetic charge is asserted without a conservation law; the singularity prediction is essentially built into the ad hoc evaporation ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.14489 v1 pith:WJJ4OBPF submitted 2025-08-20 gr-qc

Vitalii Vertogradov , Angel Rincon This is my paper

classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.20.-q

keywords RegularblackholesBardeenspacetimePenroseprocessmagneticchargesingularityformationnonlinearelectrodynamicsKretschmannscalar

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that a regular black hole need not stay regular. In the Bardeen spacetime the magnetic charge g is what caps the central curvature, and the authors argue that the charged Penrose process—a negative-energy charged particle falling into the hole—drains that charge. Because the central Kretschmann scalar grows as 96M^2/g^6, a shrinking g makes the core more and more curved until, if g goes to zero, a singularity forms. The paper builds two evaporation models, one with charge loss alone and one with charge loss plus mass accretion, and tracks how the apparent horizon and extraction efficiency respond. The authors note the mechanism requires magnetic monopoles and that it would fail for Planck-scale black holes where the generalized ergoregion is negligible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the Bardeen metric function f(r)=1-2Mr^2/(r^2+g^2)^{3/2}, whose parameter g regularizes the core; the negative-energy condition E=qφ(g,r)+√f<0 that defines the generalized ergoregion for charged particles; and the central Kretschmann value K(0)=96M^2/g^6, which ties the regularization parameter directly to curvature. The mechanism is: a negative-energy charged particle falls in, g decreases, and the inverse-sixth-power dependence of K on g turns that charge loss into unbounded curvature growth.

What would settle it

Solve or simulate the fully dynamical Bardeen spacetime with charged particle accretion and track g(t): if g stays constant while mass and electric charge change, the central Kretschmann scalar remains 96M^2/g^6 and the predicted singularity never forms. A second check is to compute the charge flux across the horizon in the Penrose process directly and see whether it is an electric current at all.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working in the Bardeen metric f(r)=1-2Mr^2/(r^2+g^2)^{3/2}, the paper treats g as a magnetic-monopole charge sourced by nonlinear electrodynamics. It shows that an electrically charged test particle can carry negative energy when its charge and the monopole potential have opposite signs, E=qφ(g,r)+√f at zero angular momentum and radial velocity, and that such negative-energy states live in a generalized ergoregion. A particle in one of these states falls into the black hole, so the Penrose process extracts energy and, the authors infer, decreases g. Since the Kretschmann scalar at the center is exactly 96M^2/g^6, any decrease of g raises the central curvature; complete evaporation of g would

Load-bearing premise

The central claim assumes that absorbing an electrically charged particle reduces the Bardeen black hole's magnetic charge g; the paper infers this from the existence of negative-energy states but derives no conservation law that connects the particle's electric charge to a change in g.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If regular Bardeen black holes can lose magnetic charge through the charged Penrose process, they are not eternal: complete charge evaporation forces a singular core.
The same reasoning should carry over to any spherically symmetric regular black hole supported by nonlinear electrodynamics, since the magnetic monopole is the generic regularization parameter.
Charge-only evaporation and charge-plus-mass accretion produce measurably different apparent-horizon evolutions, giving dynamical signatures that distinguish the two regimes.
The efficiency of energy extraction from a regular black hole can be computed from the metric and the monopole potential, extending the standard Penrose efficiency to charged processes.
If astrophysical black holes are expected to be neutral, nonlinear-electrodynamics-sourced regular black holes would be unstable endpoints of collapse rather than stable alternatives to singular black holes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

We infer a test the paper leaves open: couple the Bardeen metric to a charged accretion current and derive the time evolution of g from the field equations instead of prescribing it; if absorbed electric charge does not change g, the central curvature stays finite and the singularity never forms.
We infer that the same singularity-driving mechanism would operate for any process that neutralizes the core, including ordinary charged infall or Hawking radiation, not only the Penrose channel the paper models.
We infer that the resulting black hole should show an evolving shadow on the charge-evaporation timescale, ending in a Schwarzschild-like shadow, which is a concrete observational probe if regular Bardeen black holes exist.
We infer that the size of the generalized ergoregion and the extraction efficiency depend on the unstated potential φ(g,r); different nonlinear-electrodynamics potentials that satisfy the same asymptotic conditions could substantially change both.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This paper applies the charged Penrose process to the Bardeen regular black hole and proposes explicit evaporation models. The genuinely new part is the application to Bardeen and the time-dependent charge laws. The computation K → 96M^2/g^6 at the center is correct, and it is a useful reminder that a smaller regularization parameter increases curvature. That part is fine.

The problem is the load-bearing inference in Sec. VII: from the existence of negative-energy states for electrically charged test particles (Eqs. 10–11) they conclude that absorption reduces the magnetic charge g. That does not follow. The particle carries electric charge q; the Bardeen solution is supported by a magnetic monopole, and in the Ayon-Beato–Garcia interpretation g is a magnetic charge. Electric currents have no magnetic source term, so they cannot neutralize g. The paper never writes down a δg equation. It even says 'the particle must be charged oppositely to a black hole,' which treats a magnetic charge as if it were electric.

Once you drop that inference, the singularity conclusion collapses. The evaporation models g = g0 − λv are introduced as ansatze, not derived from the Penrose dynamics. So the claim that the charge evaporates and K diverges is essentially a restatement of the model assumption. The paper is honest to a degree—it calls the models 'proposed'—but it still presents singularity formation as a consequence of the process rather than of the chosen g(t).

There is some value here: the trajectory analysis appears standard, and the K~1/g^6 relation is correct. But the central argument has a category error that a referee would catch quickly. A serious editor could send it out because the topic is active, but I think desk rejection is appropriate. If the authors can actually derive δg from an action-level coupling, that would change the picture, but that derivation is not here.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Bardeen regular black hole and claims that a charged Penrose process can evaporate the magnetic charge g, causing the core curvature scalar K ~ 96 M^2/g^6 to diverge and thereby converting a regular black hole into a singular one. The authors analyze charged test-particle motion, exhibit negative-energy states in a generalized ergoregion, compute the energy-extraction efficiency, and then propose two phenomenological evaporation models: g = g0 - λ v (model A) and g = g0 - λ v with M = M0 + μ v (model B). The central conclusion is that magnetic charge evaporation, if driven by the charged Penrose process, leads to singularity formation.

Significance. The paper identifies a correct algebraic property of the Bardeen metric: the Kretschmann scalar at the centre diverges as g -> 0 (Eq. 53). It also gives a clear derivation of the existence of negative-energy states for an electrically charged test particle in a generic monopole potential φ(g,r) (Eqs. 10–11). However, the physically load-bearing step — that absorbing electrically charged particles decreases the magnetic charge g — is asserted without derivation. In the standard Ayón-Beato–García interpretation, g is a magnetic monopole charge, and an electric test-particle current does not source the dual field that carries that charge. Consequently, the claimed evolution from regular to singular is not established; the presented models are imposed ansätze rather than consequences of the Penrose process. If the central mechanism were demonstrated, the result would be interesting for regular black hole stability, but as it stands the significance is limited and the abstract overstates what is shown.

major comments (3)

[§VII, Eqs. (10)–(11)] The inference from negative-energy electric charge states to a decrease of the magnetic charge g is not derived. The paper states: 'This particle must be charged oppositely to a black hole. From this fact, we can conclude that the extraction energy decreases the energy associated with the black hole, magnetic charge.' In the Bardeen/ABG interpretation, g is the magnetic monopole charge sourced by the dual field *F, while an electrically charged test particle sources J_e in the equation ∇_μ(L_F F^{μν}) = J_e^ν. No equation or conservation law in the manuscript relates the electric charge q of the infalling particle to δg. This conflation of electric and magnetic charge is load-bearing for the main claim of singularity formation.
[§VI, evaporation models] The models g = g0 - λ v and M = M0 + μ v are introduced as assumptions, not derived from the charged Penrose process. The paper itself calls them 'proposed' models. Since the connection between the Penrose process and g evaporation is missing, the growth of K in Eq. (53) is a direct restatement of the assumed linear decrease of g. The abstract's claim that the paper 'shows that magnetic charge evaporation can drive a regular black hole towards a singularity' is therefore an overstatement.
[§III, Eqs. (3)–(6)] The electromagnetic potential is introduced as A_μ = φ(g,r) δ_μ^t with only asymptotic conditions (5) and (6). For the Bardeen metric supported by nonlinear electrodynamics, the potential is determined by the field equations and the Lagrangian. The manuscript does not verify that the test-particle action in Eq. (4) is consistent with the actual Bardeen solution, nor that any explicit φ(g,r) satisfying the stated conditions exists for this spacetime. Thus, while the negative-energy calculation is algebraically correct, its applicability to Bardeen spacetime is not demonstrated.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 3 caption] 'Kretchmann' should be 'Kretschmann'.
[§II, Eq. (1)] The metric has a typesetting issue: the radial component should be f(r)^{-1} dr^2, not the garbled expression in the text.
[§III, Eq. (7)] E is called 'energy per unit mass' but includes qφ, which is not a per-unit-mass quantity unless q is defined as charge per unit mass. Please clarify the conventions.
[§VII] The sentence 'the extraction energy decreases the energy associated with the black hole, magnetic charge' is grammatically unclear. Also, the paper later states that the mechanism requires hypothetical magnetic monopoles, which is in tension with the earlier calculation using electrically charged particles; this point should be addressed explicitly.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 7.0 of 10

The singularity-formation claim is loaded into the assumed g = g0 − λv ansatz; the Penrose-process derivation never links electric test charge q to magnetic charge g.

self definitional [Sec. VII (Discussions), after Eq. (53)]
"From this fact, we can conclude that the extraction energy decreases the energy associated with the black hole, magnetic charge. ... If the charge is evaporated by this process, the Kretschmann scalar will become divergent and this will lead to the formation of the singularity."

The 'fact' is only that a negatively charged test particle (electric q) can have negative-energy states when q·φ(g,r)<0 (Eqs. 10-11). No conservation law or field equation connects the absorbed particle's electric charge to a change in the Bardeen magnetic charge g; in the ABG nonlinear-electrodynamics interpretation, g is a magnetic monopole charge sourced by the dual field, while the particle carries an electric current. The conclusion that the Penrose process decreases g is therefore assumed, not derived. Once g is assumed to decrease, Eq. (53), K_center = 96M^2/g^6, is just an algebraic property of the metric, so the 'prediction' of divergence is a restatement of the input assumption.
self definitional [Sec. VI / Fig. 2 caption (evaporation models)]
"In Fig.(2), we show the apparent horizon for the two evaporation models. The blue colour represents case A with g = g0 − λv, while the red colour represents case B with g = g0 − λv and M = M0 + µv."

The paper's own abstract says 'Two evaporation models are proposed,' and these models impose linearly decreasing magnetic charge g(v) by fiat. This decreasing g is exactly the quantity whose decrease the Penrose process is supposed to explain, but it is not computed from any particle-absorption equation. Feeding g = g0 − λv into the exact formula K_center = 96 M^2/g^6 makes the Kretschmann scalar grow and diverge automatically; the claimed transition from regular Bardeen to singular Schwarzschild-like spacetime is thus written into the ansatz rather than derived from the energy-extraction mechanism.

full rationale

The paper contains a substantial self-contained component: the derivation of negative-energy states in Eqs. (10)-(11), the generalized ergoregion, and the efficiency calculation for the Penrose process are straightforward from the Bardeen metric and an assumed potential φ(g,r). Those parts are not circular. The circularity enters at the final inference. The paper needs to show that the charged Penrose process reduces the magnetic charge g. Instead, Sec. VII infers this from the sign of the electric charge q, conflating electric and magnetic charge, and Sec. VI (and the abstract) simply 'proposes' evaporation models with g = g0 − λv. Since K_center = 96M^2/g^6 is an exact algebraic consequence of the metric, assuming g decreases makes the singularity conclusion tautological. No equation relates δg to the absorbed q, so the central claim is not independently derived. This is a partial circularity: the energy extraction mechanism itself is computed, but the singularity outcome is already present in the evaporation ansatz. Score 7 rather than 8 because the paper is not resting on a self-citation chain and the negative-energy analysis has independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a stack of ad hoc assumptions: a nonzero electric potential for a magnetic monopole, an unproven discharge of magnetic charge by electric particles, and linear evaporation laws chosen by hand. The only independently grounded pieces are the Bardeen metric itself and the algebraic curvature invariant. The paper invokes magnetic monopoles from prior theory but does not introduce new entities.

free parameters (5)

lambda (charge evaporation rate) = unspecified in text
Appears in model A as g = g0 - lambda v; chosen by hand, no derivation from the Penrose process.
mu (mass accretion rate) = unspecified in text
Appears in model B as M = M0 + mu v; chosen by hand.
phi(g,r): scalar potential of the monopole field = unspecified function
Only constrained by (5) and (6); quantitative results depend on it, but no explicit form is given.
g0 initial magnetic charge = unspecified in text
Initial condition in evaporation models A and B; chosen by hand.
M0 initial mass = unspecified in text
Initial condition in evaporation model B; chosen by hand.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Bardeen metric (1)-(2) with magnetic charge g is a regular black hole supported by nonlinear electrodynamics
Sec. II; based on Bardeen [26] and Ayon-Beato-Garcia [32]. The metric family is adopted as the spacetime under study.
domain assumption The electric potential phi(g,r) of the monopole field exists and satisfies (5)-(6)
Sec. II, Eqs. (3),(5),(6). The paper imposes asymptotic flatness and monotonic decrease but gives no explicit form.
ad hoc to paper An electric test particle in the Bardeen spacetime couples through A_t = phi(g,r)
Sec. II, Eq. (3). For a standard magnetic monopole in nonlinear electrodynamics, A_t = 0; this coupling is assumed without justification.
ad hoc to paper The charged Penrose process reduces the magnetic charge g
Sec. VII, first paragraph. Inferred from the Reissner-Nordstrom analogy; no conservation law or backreaction calculation links absorbed electric charge to delta g.
ad hoc to paper Evaporation laws g = g0 - lambda v and M = M0 + mu v
Sec. VI, Fig. 2. Proposed linear models with free constants lambda and mu; not derived from the process or from Ref. [80].
standard math The Kretschmann scalar at r=0 is K = 96 M^2 / g^6
Eq. (53), direct computation from the Bardeen metric; accepted.
domain assumption Magnetic monopoles exist, as predicted by GUT and string theory
Sec. VII, refs [76,77]. The process requires hypothetical monopole-related negative-energy states.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Energy Extraction and Evolution of Regular Black Holes: The Case of Bardeen Spacetime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WJJ4OBPF

@misc{pith2026250814489,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Energy Extraction and Evolution of Regular Black Holes: The Case of Bardeen Spacetime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WJJ4OBPF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.14489}
}

read the original abstract

This paper examines regular black holes, in particular the Bardeen spacetime where singularities are replaced by non-singular cores. It explores the energy extraction through the charged Penrose process and shows that magnetic charge evaporation can drive a regular black hole towards a singularity. Two evaporation models are proposed, dealing with charge loss and combined charge evaporation with mass accretion, providing insights into the evolution and stability of regular black holes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar produces families of regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes in GR, including new closed-form solutions involving hypergeo...
Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions
gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar yields a unified framework for regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfying the weak energy condition, recovering kn...
Shadow signatures and energy accumulation in Lorentzian-Euclidean black holes
gr-qc 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

Lorentzian-Euclidean black holes produce excess inner-shadow intensity and accumulate energy at the horizon with backreaction unlike stable light rings.
Regular Black Hole Formation and Gamma-Ray Burst from Matter Conversion
gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The formation of a regular black hole could release gamma-ray-burst-scale energy only if its singularity-avoiding core is a weak perturbation of Schwarzschild.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

[1]

The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, firstM87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the su- permassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019)L1

work page 2019
[2]

The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. II. Array and instru- mentation, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L2

work page 2019
[3]

granted black holes the status of real astrophysical objects. However, classical solutions to the Einstein equations, under generic conditions regarding the mat- ter content, possess past and future singularities, which are usually hidden by the horizon. Furthermore, the famous singularity theorem [4] states that the gravita- tional collapse should lead, ...
[4]

Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities

R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965)

work page 1965
[5]

Akiyama, K. et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collabora- tion]. First Sagittarius A � Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 930, L12

work page 2022
[6]

Recent development in gravitational collapse and spacetime singularitits

Pankaj S. Joshi, D. Malafarina, “Recent development in gravitational collapse and spacetime singularitits”. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 20 2641 (2011)

work page 2011
[7]

Joshi Gravitational collapse and spacetime sin- gularities

Pankaj S. Joshi Gravitational collapse and spacetime sin- gularities. Cambridge University Press. 2007.p.273

work page 2007
[8]

Causal Structure of Singularity in non-spherical Gravitational Collapse

Dipanjan Dey, Karim Mosani, Pankaj Joshi, Vitalii Ver- togradov. Causal structure of singularity in non-spherical gravitational collapse. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 431 (2022) [arXiv:2103.07190]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

Show all 81 references

[9]

Karim Mosani, Dipanjan Dey, Pankaj S. Joshi. Global visibility of a strong curvature singularity in non- marginally bound dust collapse, Physical Review D 102(4):044037 [arXiv:2003.07092 [gr-qc]]

2003 arXiv
[10]

The eternal naked singularity formation in the case of gravitational collapse of generalized Vaidya spacetime

Vertogradov, V. The eternal naked singularity formation in the case of gravitational collapse of generalized Vaidya spacetime. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2018, 33, 1850102. arXiv:2210.16131 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[11]

Gravi- tational collapse of generalized Vaidya spacetime

Mkenyeleye, M.D.; Goswami, R.; Maharaj, S.D. Gravi- tational collapse of generalized Vaidya spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 92, 024041

2015
[12]

Naidu, Robert S

Nolene F. Naidu, Robert S. Bogadi, Anand Kaisavelu, Megan Govender. Stability and Horizon Formation dur- ing Dissipative Collapse, General Relativity and Gravi- tation 52(8) [arXiv:2102.06063 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[13]

The structure of the generalized Vaidya spacetime containing the eternal naked singular- ity

Vitalii Vertogradov. The structure of the generalized Vaidya spacetime containing the eternal naked singular- ity. International Journal of Modern Physics A Vol. 37, No. 28n29, 2250185 (2022) [arXiv:2209.10953.]

2022 arXiv
[14]

T. Harko. Gravitational collapse of a Hagedorn fluid in Vaidya geometry, Phys.Rev. D68 (2003) 064005

2003
[15]

Sergio M. C. V. Goncalves, Sanjay Jhingan. Singu- larities in gravitational collapse with radial pressure, Gen.Rel.Grav.33:2125-2149,2001 [arXiv:gr-qc/0107054]

2001 arXiv
[16]

Vertogradov, The generalized Vaidya spacetime with polytropic equation of state

V. Vertogradov, The generalized Vaidya spacetime with polytropic equation of state. General Relativity and Gravitation (2024) 56:59

2024
[17]

and references therein). It should be noted that the singularity involves two complementary aspects: the first concerns the divergence of the curvature invariants, while the second corresponds to the incompleteness of the geodesics. Therefore, to ensure that a black hole is in...

2025 arXiv
[18]

Vertogradov, V. D. (2024) Does a primary hair have an impact on the naked singularity formation in hairy Vaidya spacetime? Physics of Complex Systems, 5 (2), 83–90

2024
[19]

C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo and Y. G. Miao, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 62 (2023) no.9, 202 [arXiv:2303.11696 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[20]

A., 1982, ZhPmR, 36, 214

Markov M. A., 1982, ZhPmR, 36, 214

1982
[21]

V. P. Frolov, M. A. Markov and V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990), 383

1990
[22]

V. P. Frolov, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.10, 104056 [arXiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc]]

2016 arXiv
[23]

A. H. Chamseddine and V. Mukhanov, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.3, 183 [arXiv:1612.05861 [gr-qc]]

2017 arXiv
[24]

The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time,

S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, “The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time,” Cambridge University Press, 2023,

2023
[25]

General Relativity,

R. M. Wald, “General Relativity,” Chicago Univ. Pr., 1984,

1984
[26]

The initial stage of an expanding Uni- verse and the appearance of a nonuniform distribution of matter,

A. D. Sakharov, “The initial stage of an expanding Uni- verse and the appearance of a nonuniform distribution of matter,” Sov. Phys. JETP 22 (1966) 241

1966
[27]

Algebraic Properties of the Energy- momentum Tensor and Vacuum-like States of Matter,

E. B. Gliner, “Algebraic Properties of the Energy- momentum Tensor and Vacuum-like States of Matter,” Sov. Phys. JETP 22 (1966) 378

1966
[28]

Bardeen, Conference Proceedings in GR5, Tiflis, U.S.S.R., (1968)

J. Bardeen, Conference Proceedings in GR5, Tiflis, U.S.S.R., (1968)

1968
[29]

Kumar, R

A. Kumar, R. K. Walia and S. G. Ghosh, Universe 8 (2022) no.4, 232 [arXiv:2003.13104 [gr-qc]]

2022 arXiv
[30]

Stuchl ´ ık and J

Z. Stuchl ´ ık and J. Schee, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24 (2014) no.02, 1550020 [arXiv:1501.00015 [astro-ph.HE]]

2014 arXiv
[31]

Kumar, D

A. Kumar, D. Veer Singh and S. G. Ghosh, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.3, 275 [arXiv:1808.06498 [gr-qc]]

2019 arXiv
[32]

S. G. Ghosh and M. Amir, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) no.11, 553 [arXiv:1506.04382 [gr-qc]]

2015 arXiv
[34]

The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,

E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B 493 (2000) 149-152, arXiv:gr-qc/0009077. 10

2000 arXiv
[35]

S. A. Hayward, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), 031103 [arXiv:gr-qc/0506126 [gr-qc]]

2006 arXiv
[36]

K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001), 044005 [arXiv:gr-qc/0006014 [gr-qc]]

2001 arXiv
[37]

K. A. Bronnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 4641

2000
[38]

K. A. Bronnikov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2018) no.06, 1841005 [arXiv:1711.00087 [gr-qc]]

2018 arXiv
[39]

Contreras, ´A

E. Contreras, ´A. Rinc´ on, B. Koch and P. Bargue˜ no, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2017) no.03, 1850032 [arXiv:1711.08400 [gr-qc]]

2017 arXiv
[40]

Panotopoulos and ´A

G. Panotopoulos and ´A. Rinc´ on, Eur. Phys. J. Plus134 (2019) no.6, 300 [arXiv:1904.10847 [gr-qc]]

2019 arXiv
[41]

Eichhorn and A

A. Eichhorn and A. Held, [arXiv:2212.09495 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[42]

M. E. Rodrigues and M. V. de Sousa Silva, JCAP 06 (2018), 025 [arXiv:1802.05095 [gr-qc]]

2018 arXiv
[43]

Misyura, A

M. Misyura, A. Rincon and V. Vertogradov, Phys. Dark Univ. 46 (2024), 101717 [arXiv:2405.05370 [gr-qc]]

2024 arXiv
[44]

G. J. Olmo and D. Rubiera-Garcia, [arXiv:2209.05061 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[45]

Bonanno, D

A. Bonanno, D. Malafarina and A. Panassiti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024) no.3, 031401 [arXiv:2308.10890 [gr-qc]]

2024 arXiv
[46]

Spallucci and A

E. Spallucci and A. Smailagic, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26 (2017) no.07, 1730013 [arXiv:1701.04592 [hep-th]]

2017 arXiv
[47]

Balart, G

L. Balart, G. Panotopoulos and ´A. Rinc´ on, Annals Phys. 473 (2025), 169865 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169865 [arXiv:2412.00550 [gr-qc]]

2025
[48]

¨Ovg¨ un, R

A. ¨Ovg¨ un, R. C. Pantig and ´A. Rinc´ on, Annals Phys. 463 (2024), 169625 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169625 [arXiv:2402.14190 [gr-qc]]

2024
[49]

Balart, G

L. Balart, G. Panotopoulos and ´A. Rinc´ on, Fortsch. Phys. 71 (2023) no.12, 2300075 doi:10.1002/prop.202300075 [arXiv:2309.01910 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[50]

Rinc´ on and V

´A. Rinc´ on and V. Santos, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) no.10, 910 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08445-2 [arXiv:2009.04386 [gr-qc]]

2020 arXiv
[51]

Javed, S

W. Javed, S. Riaz and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Universe8 (2022) no.5, 262 [arXiv:2205.02229 [gr-qc]]

2022 arXiv
[52]

Z. Y. Fan and X. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.12, 124027 [arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]]

2016 arXiv
[53]

Konoplich, S.G

R.V. Konoplich, S.G. Rubin, A.S. Sakharov, M.Yu. Khlopov, FORMATION OF BLACK HOLES IN FIRST-ORDER PHASE TRANSITIONS AS A COS- MOLOGICAL TEST OF SYMMETRY-BREAKING MECHANISMS. Phys.Atom.Nucl.62:1593-1600,1999, Yad.Fiz.62:1705-1713,1999

1999
[54]

Khlopov, R.V

M.Yu. Khlopov, R.V. Konoplich, S.G. Rubin, A.S. Sakharov, FIRST-ORDER PHASE TRANSITIONS AS A SOURCE OF BLACK HOLES IN THE EARLY UNI- VERSE. Grav.Cosmol.6:153-156,2000

2000
[55]

Res.Astron.Astrophys

M.Yu.Khlopov Primordial Black Holes. Res.Astron.Astrophys. (2010) V. 10, PP. 495-528,

2010
[56]

Belotsky, A

K.M. Belotsky, A. D. Dmitriev, E. A. Esipova, V. A. Gani, A. V. Grobov, M.Yu. Khlopov, A.A.Kirillov, S. G. Rubin, I. V. Svadkovsky Signatures of primordial black hole dark matter. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 29, No. 37 (2014)

2014
[57]

Khlopov Regular black hole rem- nants and graviatoms with de Sitter interior as heavy dark matter candidates probing inhomogeneity of early universe

I.Dymnikova and M.Yu. Khlopov Regular black hole rem- nants and graviatoms with de Sitter interior as heavy dark matter candidates probing inhomogeneity of early universe. Int.J.Mod.Phys. D24 (2015), No. 11 1545002

2015
[58]

Vertogradov, A

V. Vertogradov, A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Exact Regular Black Hole Solutions with de Sitter Cores and Hagedorn Fluid. [arXiv:2408.02699 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[59]

A., Pavlov Y

Grib, A. A., Pavlov Y. V. (2020) Rotating black holes as sources of high energy particles. Physics of Complex Systems, 1 (1), 40-49.DOI: 10.33910/2687-153X-2020-1- 1-40-49

2020 doi
[60]

Penrose, R

R. Penrose, R. M. Floyd, Extraction of Rotational En- ergy from a Black Hole. Nature Physical Science 229, 177 (1971)

1971
[61]

O. B. Zaslavskii, On geodesics with negative ener- gies in the ergoregions of dirty black holes / /Modern Physics Letters A. 30, No. 10 - Volume 30, — 2024. [arXiv:1412.1725v1]

2024 arXiv
[62]

[arXiv:2410.05198 [gr-qc]]

Vitalii Vertogradov, Leonid Shleiger, On Geodesic mo- tion of particles with zero energy in Kerr and rotating dirty black holes. [arXiv:2410.05198 [gr-qc]]

arXiv
[63]

Denardo, Ruffini, ON THE ENERGETICS OF REISS- NER NORDSTROM GEOMETRIES. Phys. Lett., vol 45B, 259 (1973)

1973
[64]

R., Zhitov D

Pryadilin T. R., Zhitov D. V., Vertogradov V. D., On par- ticle collisions in the vicinity of the charged black holes // Gravitation and Cosmology. — 2024. — Volume 30, Issue 1. – P. 48-56

2024
[65]

S. W. Hawking (1975), Particle Creation by Black Holes, Comm. Math. Phys. 43, 199

1975
[66]

Bakhtiyor Narzilloev, Javlon Rayimbaev, Sanjar Shay- matov, Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov, Bobomurat Ahmedov, Cosimo Bambi, Dynamics of test particles around a Bardeen black hole surrounded by perfect fluid dark mat- ter. Phys. Rev. D 102, 104062 (2020) [arXiv:2011.06148 [gr-qc]]

2020 arXiv
[67]

V. D. Vertogradov. Geodesics with negative energy in the ergosphere of rotating black holes. // Gravitation and Cosmology. Vol. 21, Iss. 2. 2015.- PP. 171-174. [arXiv:2210.04674]

2015 arXiv
[68]

A. A. Grib, Y. V. Pavlov, V. D. Vertogradov Geodesics with negative energy in the ergosphere of rotating black holes. Modern Physics Letters A. Vol. 29,Iss. 20. 2014- P. 14501-14510. [arXiv:1304.7360]

2014 arXiv
[69]

Vertogradov, Extraction energy from charged Vaidya black hole via the Penrose process 2023 Commun

V. Vertogradov, Extraction energy from charged Vaidya black hole via the Penrose process 2023 Commun. Theor. Phys. 75 045404

2023
[70]

O. B. Zaslavskii, Negative energy states in the Reissner- Nordstr¨ om metric Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, 2150120 (2021), arXiv:2006.02189 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[71]

P., & Weinberg, E

Lee, K., Nair, V. P., & Weinberg, E. J. 1992, General Rel- ativity and Gravitation, The fate of magnetically charged black holes, 24, 12, 1203. doi:10.1007/BF02418208

1992 doi
[72]

JHEP 2018 (2018) 23

Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati, Costantino Pacilio, Matt Visser, On the vi- ability of regular black holes. JHEP 2018 (2018) 23. arXiv:1805.02675 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[73]

arXiv:2411.14964 [gr-qc]

Julio Arrechea, Giulio Neri, Stefano Liberati, Inner hori- zon instability via the trace anomaly effective action. arXiv:2411.14964 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[74]

Gen Relativ Gravit 54 (2022) 132

Yen Chin Ong, On Black Hole Thermodynamics, Singu- larity, and Gravitational Entropy. Gen Relativ Gravit 54 (2022) 132. arXiv:2210.16856 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[75]

Maldacena, JHEP 04 (2021), 079 [arXiv:2004.06084 [hep-th]]

J. Maldacena, JHEP 04 (2021), 079 [arXiv:2004.06084 [hep-th]]

2021 arXiv
[76]

Ojako, R

S. Ojako, R. Goswami, S.D. Maharaj, R. Narain, Confor- mal symmetries in generalised Vaidya spacetimes, 2020 Class. Quantum Grav. 37 055005 [arXiv:1904.08120 [gr- qc]]

2020 arXiv
[77]

Vertogradov and D

V. Vertogradov and D. Kudryavcev, Generalized vaidya spacetime: horizons, conformal symmetries, surfacegrav- 11 ity and diagonalization, Modern Physics Letters A, p. 2350119, 2023, [arXiv:2212.07130 [gr-qc]]

2023 arXiv
[78]

’t Hooft, Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theo- ries, Nucl

G. ’t Hooft, Magnetic monopoles in unified gauge theo- ries, Nucl. Phys. B 79 (1974) 276–284

1974
[79]

Polchinski, Dirichlet-Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges, Phys

J. Polchinski, Dirichlet-Branes and Ramond-Ramond Charges, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724–4727; arXiv:hep-th/9510017

1995 arXiv
[80]

arXiv:2504.19292 [gr-qc]

Vitalii Vertogradov, Gravitational Collapse and Forma- tion of Regular Black Holes: Dymnikova, Hayward, and Beyond. arXiv:2504.19292 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[81]

Phys.Dark Univ

Vitalii Vertogradov, Regular black hole from gravita- tional collapse of dust and radiation. Phys.Dark Univ. 48 (2025) 101881

2025
[82]

Physics Letters B, 867, 2025, 139607

Vitalii Vertogradov,Dynamical Black Holes: Apparent Horizon Versus Energy Conditions. Physics Letters B, 867, 2025, 139607

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, firstM87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the su- permassive black hole, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019)L1

work page 2019

[2] [2]

The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. II. Array and instru- mentation, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875 (2019) L2

work page 2019

[3] [3]

granted black holes the status of real astrophysical objects. However, classical solutions to the Einstein equations, under generic conditions regarding the mat- ter content, possess past and future singularities, which are usually hidden by the horizon. Furthermore, the famous singularity theorem [4] states that the gravita- tional collapse should lead, ...

[4] [4]

Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities

R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Sin- gularities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 14, 57 (1965)

work page 1965

[5] [5]

Akiyama, K. et al. [Event Horizon Telescope Collabora- tion]. First Sagittarius A � Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2022, 930, L12

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Recent development in gravitational collapse and spacetime singularitits

Pankaj S. Joshi, D. Malafarina, “Recent development in gravitational collapse and spacetime singularitits”. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 20 2641 (2011)

work page 2011

[7] [7]

Joshi Gravitational collapse and spacetime sin- gularities

Pankaj S. Joshi Gravitational collapse and spacetime sin- gularities. Cambridge University Press. 2007.p.273

work page 2007

[8] [8]

Causal Structure of Singularity in non-spherical Gravitational Collapse

Dipanjan Dey, Karim Mosani, Pankaj Joshi, Vitalii Ver- togradov. Causal structure of singularity in non-spherical gravitational collapse. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 431 (2022) [arXiv:2103.07190]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022