Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 46 references

Approach to the separatrix with eccentric orbits

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives an analytic, closed-form description of the very end of an eccentric adiabatic inspiral into a Schwarzschild black hole, with the deviation from the separatrix governed by the Lambert W function.

desk verdict Genuinely new analytic control of eccentric inspirals near the separatrix, with a couple of reproducibility gaps that a referee should press on. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04249 v2 pith:WM2ZZPOV submitted 2024-12-05 gr-qc hep-th

Guillaume Lhost , Geoffrey Compère This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords eccentricorbitsseparatrixadiabaticinspiralself-forceLambertWfunctionellipticintegralsSchwarzschildextrememassratioinspirals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how an eccentric, non-spinning extreme-mass-ratio inspiral reaches the separatrix—the last stable orbit before plunge—within the leading adiabatic approximation of the self-force framework, the perturbative treatment of the small companion's gravitational back-reaction. Its central claim is that the late-time solution is analytic and universal in form: the deviation $\delta^{(0)}=p^{(0)}-(6+2e^{(0)})$ from the separatrix is given by a Lambert $W_{-1}$ function of the time to plunge, Eq. (3.15), with coefficients fixed by self-force Fourier data evaluated at the separatrix. If correct, this gives an explicit outer boundary condition for any future transition-to-plunge scheme, extends the known quasi-circular results to arbitrary eccentricity, and explains the logarithmic divergence of the number of whirls near the end of inspiral. The route passes through a new asymptotic expansion of complete elliptic integrals of the third kind in the double limit where both parameters tend to 1.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the asymptotic expansion (3.5) of the complete elliptic integral of the third kind $\Pi(n(\delta),m(\delta))$ in the case where the two parameters $n$ and $m$ approach 1 simultaneously as $\delta\to0$, a limit not covered by standard textbook formulas. The derivation in Appendix B turns this double limit into an ordinary differential equation for $\bar\Pi(\delta)$ and integrates it using the two auxiliary functions $\Lambda(e)$ and $\Theta(e)$. From that expansion the paper obtains the logarithmic divergences of the orbital frequencies and the asymptotic slow-variable equations (3.12). The second named ingredient is the real branch $W_{-1}$ of the Lambert W function, the branch of the inverse of $w e^w$ with domain $[-e^{-1},0)$ and range $(-\infty,-1]$, which exactly integrates Eq. (3.12a) into the closed form (3.15). The coefficient $A(e_*)$ carries the self-force Fourier data while $B(e_*)$ carries the eccentricity-only frequency data; both determine the time of crossing and the shape of the final approach.

What would settle it

Evaluate the exact 0PA equations numerically for a fixed separatrix eccentricity, say $e_*=0.2673$, and compare the time series of $\delta^{(0)}$ with Eq. (3.15) using the paper's $A$ and $B$; the relative mismatch should shrink as $\delta^{(0)}\to0$. A more direct test is to compute $\Pi\left(\frac{2e(2+2e+\delta)}{(1+e)(4e+\delta)},\frac{4e}{4e+\delta}\right)$ numerically on a grid of small $\delta$ and compare with the two displayed lines of Eq. (3.5); a discrepancy at the claimed subleading logarithmic order would falsify the central result at its root.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the slow evolution of an eccentric equatorial inspiral around a Schwarzschild black hole is asymptotically solvable exactly at the separatrix. Defining $\delta^{(0)}=p^{(0)}-(6+2e^{(0)})$, the paper shows that the 0PA equations reduce, as $\delta^{(0)}\to0^+$, to the pair (3.12) with $e^{(0)}\to e_*$ finite and $\frac{de^{(0)}}{d\delta^{(0)}}\to(e_*-1)/8$. The solution for the approach to the separatrix is Eq. (3.15): $$\$delta^{{(0)}}$(\tilde t)=$e^{{\frac12-\frac{B(e_*)}}${e_*}} $e^{{\frac12 W_{-1}}$\left(-\frac{4A(e_*)}{e_*} $e^{{\frac{2B(e_*)}}${e_*}-1}(\tilde t_*-\tilde t)\right)}.$$ Here $e_*$ is the eccentricity at separatrix crossing, $A(e_*)$ is constructed from the Fourier modes of the dissipative self-force at the separatrix, and $B(e_*)$ is a pure eccentricity function coming from the radial-frequency expansion. From this solution the paper derives that the eccentricity increases during the final approach, that the whirl count diverges logarithmically, that the crossing is head-on in the $(p,e)$ plane and tangential in the $(E,L)$ plane, and that energy and angular momentum admit explicit proper-time expansions with logarithmic corrections. The results are stated for any eccentricity $0<e_*<1$, with the quasi-circular limit recovered as a check.

Load-bearing premise

The entire chain depends on the new asymptotic expansion (3.5) of the complete elliptic integral of the third kind when both of its parameters go to 1 together; if that expansion is missing a term at the logarithmic orders used, then the coefficients $B(e_*)$, the asymptotic equations, and the Lambert $W_{-1}$ solution all inherit the error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Near the separatrix the adiabatic inspiral needs no further numerical integration: both slow variables and the fast-angle behavior are given by closed-form formulas in terms of separatrix self-force data.
  • The instantaneous number of whirls grows logarithmically as $\log(64e_*/\delta^{(0)})$, with an eccentricity-dependent coefficient, confirming and sharpening the zoom-whirl picture.
  • The eccentricity rises during the final approach since the critical function $C=d\log e/d\log p$ tends to the negative value $-(1-e_*)/e_*$, so the trajectory hits the separatrix head-on in the $(p,e)$ plane but tangentially in the $(E,L)$ plane.
  • The energy and angular momentum at the separatrix have explicit late-time expansions with $(\tau_*-\tau)$ times logarithmic corrections, giving a ready outer solution for a quasi-circular-like transition-to-plunge matching.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A numerical 0PA inspiral code could test the paper directly by fitting its last segment to Eq. (3.15); the fitted $A$ and $B$ should agree with the elliptic-integral expressions to within the stated logarithmic accuracy.
  • The same double-limit elliptic-integral strategy should be examined in Kerr, where the wider two-constant parameter space may still collapse onto a Lambert-type separatrix law for generic orbits; this is not attempted here.
  • If the periapsis conjecture (3.18) is proven for all Fourier modes, the leading transition-to-plunge coefficient becomes a purely local quantity at periapsis, which would simplify waveform models; that conclusion goes beyond what is established in this paper.
  • Because the 0PA radius is explicitly inaccurate at the separatrix, the correct use of these formulas is as an outer asymptotic solution to be matched to an inner plunge layer, not as a complete waveform up to crossing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the late-time approach to the separatrix in eccentric adiabatic (0PA) inspirals around a Schwarzschild black hole. Using a multiscale framework, the authors reduce the adiabatic equations to a system for the separatrix parameter δ(0)=p(0)-(6+2e(0)) and the eccentricity e(0). The central result is Eq. (3.15), which gives δ(0)(t) as an explicit Lambert W_{-1} function of t*−t, with coefficients A(e*) and B(e*) built from dissipative self-force Fourier modes at the separatrix. The derivation relies on a new asymptotic expansion of the complete elliptic integral of the third kind with both parameters tending to 1 (Eq. (3.5), derived in Appendix B), followed by an asymptotic reduction of the averaged equations (Eqs. (3.12)). The paper also obtains the eccentricity evolution (3.17), the fast angles (3.19), the whirl count (3.11), energy/angular-momentum behavior (3.22)-(3.24), the critical function (3.26), the redshift (3.31), and phase-space geometry, comparing with previous results [41,42] and with one numerical 0PA evolution in Fig. 2.

Significance. If correct, the main formula characterizes the end state of eccentric adiabatic inspirals analytically, going beyond the quasi-circular transition work and providing a concrete building block for a future transition-to-plunge scheme. The identification of the Lambert W_{-1} function as the key mathematical structure is an interesting and nontrivial insight. The paper is careful to compare with the full 0PA equations for one eccentricity and with known results, and the derivation is first-principles with an explicit (though not fully self-contained) appendix and accompanying notebooks. The main risks are the unproven double-limit elliptic-integral expansion and the only partially verified Fourier-mode decomposition of A(e*), both of which are load-bearing for Eq. (3.15).

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Appendix B] The asymptotic expansion (3.5) of Π(n(δ),m(δ)) with both parameters tending to 1 is the foundation of the entire derivation. The proof in Appendix B, however, rests on the assumed asymptotic form (B.10) for ξ(x) and its derivatives, and the final coefficients (B.16) are stated after an integration-by-parts argument that is only summarized; the details are relegated to notebooks whose location is not given in the manuscript. Since every subsequent equation, including (3.9), (3.12), and the Lambert-W solution (3.15), inherits (3.5), this gap is load-bearing. Please provide either a complete proof of (B.10)-(B.16) or a direct numerical verification of (3.5) against the exact elliptic integral for several eccentricities, and give a stable URL or DOI for the notebooks.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Appendix C] The factorization of A(e*) into a sum over self-force Fourier modes is verified explicitly only for k = −2,...,2, and the text states that the authors "expect" it to hold for any k. Since A(e*) multiplies the leading divergence in Eq. (3.12a), an unverified contribution from higher harmonics could change the coefficient and hence the entire Lambert-W formula (3.15). Please close this gap either by deriving a closed form for A_φ(k) for all k, as is done for A_r(k) in Eq. (C.3), or by testing higher harmonics numerically with self-force data.
  3. [Fig. 2 and Section 3.3] The numerical validation of the asymptotic equations against the full 0PA equations is performed for a single eccentricity e* = 0.2673, and the reported relative mismatches (3% for de/dt, 0.3% for dδ/dt at δ = 0.4) are evaluated at a relatively large δ. Because the central claim is made for general e*, please extend the comparison to at least one additional eccentricity and to smaller δ values where the leading logarithmic behavior is more robust, or otherwise test the elliptic-integral expansion (3.5) directly.
minor comments (6)
  1. [General / reproducibility] The text repeatedly refers to "this Github repository" and "this Github repository" as the location of the notebooks, but no URL or DOI appears in the manuscript. Please include the complete, stable link.
  2. [Section 3.4] In the paragraph following Eq. (3.24), the sentence "the limit e⋆ → 0 provides dE/dδ(0) = 1/(6√6) dL/dδ(0) + O(δ(0))" is poorly typeset and could be read as a statement about dE/dδ and dL/dδ rather than a ratio of derivatives; please rewrite it as a limit of dE/dL or use consistent notation.
  3. [Section 3.2] The domain of validity "0 < δ(0) < e−B(e⋆)/e⋆" uses an ambiguous dash for the exponent; please typeset it as e^{−B(e⋆)/e⋆}.
  4. [Section 3.2] There is a typo: "peripasis" should be "periapsis" in the sentence about the whirl motion.
  5. [Figures] Figure 1's axis is labeled "log(δ(0))", but the text uses δ^(0) with a superscript; please make the notation uniform in all figures.
  6. [Appendix B] The partial differential equations (B.5) for Π(n,m) are given without a reference; citing a standard source for these differential identities (e.g., Byrd & Friedman or the NIST Handbook) would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the separatrix solution is an analytic solve of the 0PA equations with external self-force inputs.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The paper defines the adiabatic slow-variable equations in Section 2.7, then in Section 3.1 derives (not cites) the double-limit asymptotic expansion of the elliptic integral of the third kind, Eq. (3.5), in Appendix B, and uses it to obtain the asymptotic ODEs (3.12). Eq. (3.15) is the explicit Lambert W solution of the leading-order ODE (3.12a), so the claimed prediction is obtained by solving the equations, not by fitting a parameter to the target quantity. The coefficients A(e*) and B(e*) are built from self-force Fourier modes at the separatrix as inputs; these are external numerical data provided by self-force calculations, not quantities fitted to the late-time behavior being predicted. The asymptotic formulas are checked against the full 0PA equations in Fig. 2 using externally supplied self-force data, and the whirl count and critical function are compared with prior independent results [41,42]. Self-citations [29,30,31] are used only for comparison with the quasi-circular limit and for context, not as load-bearing premises of the eccentric derivation. The limitations flagged in the paper—partial proofs deferred to notebooks, and the conjecture (3.18) proved only for Fourier modes k=-2,...,2—are gaps in rigor or completeness, not circularity: neither the notebooks nor the conjecture are assumed as inputs to the derivation of Eq. (3.15). The asymptotic expansion (3.5) is asserted with a summarized proof in Appendix B; if it were incorrect, the formulas would be wrong, but that is a correctness risk rather than a logical circularity. No pattern of self-definition, fitted-input-as-prediction, self-citation load-bearing, imported uniqueness, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central solution depends on external numerical inputs: the self-force Fourier modes at the separatrix (provided by van de Meent's self-force code) and the adiabatic framework from [2,3]. These are inputs, not fitted parameters, so the free-parameter list is empty. The main unproved inputs are the validity of the 0PA expansion at the separatrix, the continuity and differentiability of the self-force there, and the extension of the A-coefficient Fourier structure to all k. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The adiabatic (0PA) two-timescale expansion is valid up to the separatrix.
    The derivation solves the 0PA equations (2.38)-(2.45) in the limit delta to 0+; validity near the separatrix is inherited from [2,3], not proven here.
  • domain assumption The self-force is continuous and differentiable with respect to (E,L) at the separatrix.
    Stated before Eq. (3.4): 'We now assume that the self-force f^mu as a function of the energy E and angular momentum L is continuous and differentiable at the separatrix.' This justifies the derivative relation (3.4).
  • domain assumption The self-force admits a Fourier series in the relativistic anomaly psi_r.
    Eq. (2.44) assumes f^mu(p_i, psi_r) = sum_k f^mu_(k)(p_i) e^{-ik psi_r}; standard for periodic functions, assumed without proof.
  • domain assumption The background is Schwarzschild, equatorial, and nonspinning.
    Section 2.1 restricts the setup: 'we set the spin of the primary to zero and the geodesic motion to be equatorial.' The claim is scoped to that configuration.
  • ad hoc to paper The Fourier-mode decomposition of the coefficient A holds for all k.
    Section 3.2 states: 'We checked explicitly this structure for the Fourier modes ranging from k=-2 to k=2 and we expect that it holds for any k in Z.' The main solution (3.15) uses A as the full sum over all k.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Approach to the separatrix with eccentric orbits." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WM2ZZPOV

@misc{pith2026241204249,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Approach to the separatrix with eccentric orbits},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WM2ZZPOV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04249}
}
abstract

Eccentric binary compact mergers are prime targets of current and future gravitational wave observatories. In the small mass ratio expansion, post-adiabatic inspirals have been modeled up to the separatrix, where first-principle modeling currently ends. In this paper, we derive the analytic late time solution to the adiabatic inspiral in terms of self-force coefficients at the separatrix. We identify the role of the Lambert $W_{-1}$ function as a key mathematical ingredient in the approach to the separatrix.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Pound and B

    A. Pound and B. Wardell,Black hole perturbation theory and gravitational self-force, 2101.04592

    arXiv

  2. [3]

    Hinderer and E.E

    T. Hinderer and E.E. Flanagan,Two timescale analysis of extreme mass ratio inspirals in Kerr. I. Orbital Motion,Phys. Rev.D78(2008) 064028 [0805.3337]

    arXiv 2008

  3. [4]

    Hughes, N

    S.A. Hughes, N. Warburton, G. Khanna, A.J.K. Chua and M.L. Katz,Adiabatic waveforms for extreme mass-ratio inspirals via multivoice decomposition in time and frequency,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 104014 [2102.02713]

    arXiv 2021

  4. [5]

    Cutler, D

    C. Cutler, D. Kennefick and E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation reaction for bound motion around a Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3816

    work page 1994

  5. [6]

    Pound and E

    A. Pound and E. Poisson,Osculating orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime, with an application to extreme mass-ratio inspirals,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 044013 [0708.3033]

    arXiv 2008

  6. [7]

    Gair, E.E

    J.R. Gair, E.E. Flanagan, S. Drasco, T. Hinderer and S. Babak,Forced motion near black holes,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044037 [1012.5111]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [8]

    Barack and N

    L. Barack and N. Sago,Gravitational self-force on a particle in eccentric orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 084021 [1002.2386]

    arXiv 2010

  8. [9]

    Barack, T

    L. Barack, T. Damour and N. Sago,Precession effect of the gravitational self-force in a Schwarzschild spacetime and the effective one-body formalism,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 084036 [1008.0935]

    arXiv 2010

Show all 46 references
  1. [10]

    Barack and N

    L. Barack and N. Sago,Beyond the geodesic approximation: conservative effects of the gravitational self-force in eccentric orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 084023 [1101.3331]

    2011 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Drasco and S.A

    S. Drasco and S.A. Hughes,Gravitational wave snapshots of generic extreme mass ratio inspirals,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 024027 [gr-qc/0509101]

    2006 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Akcay,A Fast Frequency-Domain Algorithm for Gravitational Self-Force: I

    S. Akcay,A Fast Frequency-Domain Algorithm for Gravitational Self-Force: I. Circular Orbits in Schwarzschild Spacetime,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 124026 [1012.5860]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Warburton, S

    N. Warburton, S. Akcay, L. Barack, J.R. Gair and N. Sago,Evolution of inspiral orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 061501 [1111.6908]

    2012 arXiv

  5. [14]

    Van De Meent and N

    M. Van De Meent and N. Warburton,Fast Self-forced Inspirals,Class. Quant. Grav.35 (2018) 144003 [1802.05281]

    2018 arXiv

  6. [15]

    Fujita and M

    R. Fujita and M. Shibata,Extreme mass ratio inspirals on the equatorial plane in the adiabatic order,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 064005 [2008.13554]. – 35 –

    2020 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Katz, A.J.K

    M.L. Katz, A.J.K. Chua, L. Speri, N. Warburton and S.A. Hughes,Fast extreme-mass-ratio-inspiral waveforms: New tools for millihertz gravitational-wave data analysis,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 064047 [2104.04582]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Lynch, M

    P. Lynch, M. van de Meent and N. Warburton,Eccentric self-forced inspirals into a rotating black hole,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 145004 [2112.05651]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Leather and N

    B. Leather and N. Warburton,Applying the effective-source approach to frequency-domain self-force calculations for eccentric orbits,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 084045 [2306.17221]

    2023 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Speri, M.L

    L. Speri, M.L. Katz, A.J.K. Chua, S.A. Hughes, N. Warburton, J.E. Thompson et al.,Fast and Fourier: Extreme Mass Ratio Inspiral Waveforms in the Frequency Domain, 2307.12585

    arXiv

  11. [20]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Placidi, A. Nagar, M. Orselli and S. Bernuzzi,New avenue for accurate analytical waveforms and fluxes for eccentric compact binaries,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L121503 [2203.16286]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Albanesi, A

    S. Albanesi, A. Nagar and S. Bernuzzi,Effective one-body model for extreme-mass-ratio spinning binaries on eccentric equatorial orbits: Testing radiation reaction and waveform, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 024067 [2104.10559]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Becker and S.A

    D.R. Becker and S.A. Hughes,Transition from adiabatic inspiral to plunge for eccentric binaries,2410.09160

    arXiv

  14. [23]

    Sundararajan,The Transition from adiabatic inspiral to geodesic plunge for a compact object around a massive Kerr black hole: Generic orbits,Phys

    P.A. Sundararajan,The Transition from adiabatic inspiral to geodesic plunge for a compact object around a massive Kerr black hole: Generic orbits,Phys. Rev.D77(2008) 124050 [0803.4482]

    2008 arXiv

  15. [24]

    O’Shaughnessy,Transition from inspiral to plunge for eccentric equatorial Kerr orbits, Phys

    R.W. O’Shaughnessy,Transition from inspiral to plunge for eccentric equatorial Kerr orbits, Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 044004 [gr-qc/0211023]

    2003 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Albanesi, S

    S. Albanesi, S. Bernuzzi, T. Damour, A. Nagar and A. Placidi,Faithful effective-one-body waveform of small-mass-ratio coalescing black hole binaries: The eccentric, nonspinning case, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 084037 [2305.19336]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [26]

    De Amicis, S

    M. De Amicis, S. Albanesi and G. Carullo,Inspiral-inherited ringdown tails,Phys. Rev. D 110(2024) 104005 [2406.17018]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [27]

    Islam, G

    T. Islam, G. Faggioli, G. Khanna, S.E. Field, M. van de Meent and A. Buonanno, Phenomenology and origin of late-time tails in eccentric binary black hole mergers, 2407.04682

  19. [28]

    Stein and N

    L.C. Stein and N. Warburton,Location of the last stable orbit in Kerr spacetime,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 064007 [1912.07609]

    2020 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Comp` ere and L

    G. Comp` ere and L. K¨ uchler,Self-consistent adiabatic inspiral and transition motion,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 241106 [2102.12747]. – 36 –

    2021 arXiv

  21. [30]

    Comp` ere and L

    G. Comp` ere and L. K¨ uchler,Asymptotically matched quasi-circular inspiral and transition-to-plunge in the small mass ratio expansion,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 043 [2112.02114]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [31]

    K¨ uchler, G

    L. K¨ uchler, G. Comp` ere, L. Durkan and A. Pound,Self-force framework for transition-to-plunge waveforms,2405.00170

    arXiv

  23. [32]

    Ori and K.S

    A. Ori and K.S. Thorne,The Transition from inspiral to plunge for a compact body in a circular equatorial orbit around a massive, spinning black hole,Phys. Rev.D62(2000) 124022 [gr-qc/0003032]

    2000 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Buonanno and T

    A. Buonanno and T. Damour,Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences,Phys. Rev.D62(2000) 064015 [gr-qc/0001013]

    2000 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Kesden,Transition from adiabatic inspiral to plunge into a spinning black hole,Phys

    M. Kesden,Transition from adiabatic inspiral to plunge into a spinning black hole,Phys. Rev.D83(2011) 104011 [1101.3749]

    2011 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Fujita and W

    R. Fujita and W. Hikida,Analytical solutions of bound timelike geodesic orbits in Kerr spacetime,Class. Quant. Grav.26(2009) 135002 [0906.1420]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Lynch and O

    P. Lynch and O. Burke,A note on the conversion of orbital angles for extreme mass ratio inspirals,2411.04955

    arXiv

  28. [37]

    Comp` ere and L

    G. Comp` ere and L. K¨ uchler,Erratum: Self-consistent adiabatic inspiral and transition motion,to be published in Phys. Rev. Lett

  29. [38]

    Miller and A

    J. Miller and A. Pound,Two-timescale evolution of extreme-mass-ratio inspirals: waveform generation scheme for quasicircular orbits in Schwarzschild spacetime,Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 064048 [2006.11263]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [39]

    G. I.S. and R. I.M.,1 - elementary functions, inTable of Integrals, Series, and Products (Eighth Edition), D. Zwillinger, V. Moll, I. Gradshteyn and I. Ryzhik, eds., (Boston), pp. 25–62, Academic Press (2014), DOI

    2014

  31. [40]

    Olver, D

    F. Olver, D. Lozier, R. Boisvert and C. Clark,The NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (2010-05-12 00:05:00, 2010)

    2010

  32. [41]

    Glampedakis and D

    K. Glampedakis and D. Kennefick,Zoom and whirl: Eccentric equatorial orbits around spinning black holes and their evolution under gravitational radiation reaction,Phys. Rev. D 66(2002) 044002 [gr-qc/0203086]

    2002 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Cutler, D

    C. Cutler, D. Kennefick and E. Poisson,Gravitational radiation reaction for bound motion around a schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 3816

    1994

  34. [43]

    Kennefick,Stability under radiation reaction of circular equatorial orbits around Kerr black holes,Phys

    D. Kennefick,Stability under radiation reaction of circular equatorial orbits around Kerr black holes,Phys. Rev.D58(1998) 064012 [gr-qc/9805102]

    1998 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Mummery and S

    A. Mummery and S. Balbus,Inspirals from the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit of Kerr – 37 – Black Holes: Exact Solutions and Universal Radial Flow,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 161101 [2209.03579]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Mummery and S

    A. Mummery and S. Balbus,Complete characterization of the orbital shapes of the noncircular Kerr geodesic solutions with circular orbit constants of motion,Phys. Rev. D 107(2023) 124058 [2302.01159]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Gundlach, S

    C. Gundlach, S. Akcay, L. Barack and A. Nagar,Critical phenomena at the threshold of immediate merger in binary black hole systems: the extreme mass ratio case,Phys. Rev. D 86(2012) 084022 [1207.5167]

    2012 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Corless, G

    R. Corless, G. Gonnet, D. Hare, D. Jeffrey and D. Knuth,On the lambert w function, Advances in Computational Mathematics5(1996) 329. – 38 –

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.