Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Intermediate Layer Optimization for Inverse Problems using Deep Generative Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.07364 v1 pith:WM5AXQ6E submitted 2021-02-15 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords layerdeepgenerativeinversemodelsoptimizationproblemsball
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We propose Intermediate Layer Optimization (ILO), a novel optimization algorithm for solving inverse problems with deep generative models. Instead of optimizing only over the initial latent code, we progressively change the input layer obtaining successively more expressive generators. To explore the higher dimensional spaces, our method searches for latent codes that lie within a small $l_1$ ball around the manifold induced by the previous layer. Our theoretical analysis shows that by keeping the radius of the ball relatively small, we can improve the established error bound for compressed sensing with deep generative models. We empirically show that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods introduced in StyleGAN-2 and PULSE for a wide range of inverse problems including inpainting, denoising, super-resolution and compressed sensing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CENSOR: Defense Against Gradient Inversion via Orthogonal Subspace Bayesian Sampling

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    CENSOR defends federated learning against gradient inversion by transmitting a loss-optimized random gradient orthogonal to the true gradient, but its security claim is not established against adaptive adversaries.

  2. Revisiting the Privacy Risks of Split Inference: A GAN-Based Data Reconstruction Attack via Progressive Feature Optimization

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    PFO improves GAN-based split-inference reconstruction via progressive intermediate-feature optimization, but its quantitative claims rest on internally inconsistent metric tables.

Pith tools