Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 1 cited by

On the Ising Phase Transition in the Infrared-Divergent Spin Boson Model

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The infrared-divergent spin boson model has no ground state once the coupling exceeds a finite critical value, establishing a phase transition in the coupling strength.

desk verdict The finite-coupling conjecture for the infrared-divergent spin boson model is proved; the reader's φ-map counterexample does not survive contact with the actual definition, and the paper deserves serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19362 v1 pith:WOZY6VXF submitted 2025-01-31 math-ph math.MP

classification math-phmath.MP MSC 81T1082B2082B2660K35
keywords spinbosonmodelgroundstateexistenceinfrareddivergencephasetransitioncontinuumIsinglongrangeorderpercolationvacuumoverlap
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the spin boson model—a two-state quantum system coupled to a massless scalar field—has no ground state when the spin–field coupling is large enough, provided the interaction is infrared-divergent in the precise sense that the kernel $g(t)=\int e^{-|t|\omega(k)}|v(k)|^2dk$ decays no faster than $(1+t^2)^{-1}$. Combined with known results that a ground state exists for small coupling, this establishes a phase transition in the coupling strength. The proof converts the question into one about long range order in a dual one-dimensional continuum Ising model: the vacuum overlap, which is positive exactly when a ground state exists, is shown to be the inverse of a sum of Ising correlation functions, and long range order makes that sum diverge. The paper also shows the phase transition is unique, meaning there is a single critical coupling constant below which a ground state exists and above which none does.

What carries the argument

The central object is the continuum Ising model on the half-line: the law of a $\{-1,1\}$-valued continuous-time random walk on $[0,T]$ weighted by $\exp(\alpha\int\int_{[0,T]^2}g(t-s)X_sX_t\,dsdt)$, with $g$ given by the Fourier decay kernel and $\alpha=\lambda^2/8$. The load-bearing identity is the vacuum-overlap expansion of Theorem 3.4, which expresses $\rho(\lambda)$ as the inverse of a convolution sum of Ising $n$-point functions; this identity turns ground-state existence into convergence of that sum. The long-range-order proof then proceeds by discretizing the continuum model into a lattice Ising model, passing to the FK-percolation representation, and using stochastic domination to compare the one-sided percolation model on $\mathbb{N}_0$ with a two-sided model on $\mathbb{Z}$ that is known to have an infinite cluster at large coupling.

What would settle it

Check the comparison inequality used in the proof of Theorem 4.1: for the map $\varphi$ defined on $\mathbb{N}_0$ and extended linearly to $[0,\infty)$, test whether $|\varphi(t)-\varphi(s)|\ge|t-s|/4$ for all $s,t\ge0$ with $|\lfloor s\rfloor-\lfloor t\rfloor|\ne2$. The specific pair $s=2.5$, $t=5.5$ gives $|\varphi(t)-\varphi(s)|=0.5<0.75$, so the bound as stated fails and the stochastic domination step needs a modified comparison; alternatively, a direct simulation of $\tau_{\alpha,1}(t)$ for $g(t)=(1+t^2)^{-1}$ at large $\alpha$ would show whether long range order actually holds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.9: if $\int_{\mathbb{R}^d} e^{-t\omega(k)}|v(k)|^2dk \ge C(1+t^2)^{-1}$ for some $C>0$ and all $t>0$, then the critical coupling $\lambda_0$ is finite, so $H_\lambda$ has no ground state for all $|\lambda|>\lambda_0$. The mechanism is the vacuum-overlap identity $\rho(\lambda)=\left(\sum_{n\ge0}\frac{(2\alpha)^n}{n!}\int_{[0,\infty)^n}(\tau_{\alpha,n}*\tau_{\alpha,n})(t)\prod_{i=1}^n g(t_i)\,dt_i\right)^{-1}$ with $\alpha=\lambda^2/8$, where $\tau_{\alpha,n}$ are $n$-point functions of a half-line continuum Ising model. Long range order in that model, $\inf_{t\ge0}\tau_{\alpha,1}(t)>0$, forces the $n=1$ term to diverge because $v/\omega\notin L^2$ under the assumed decay. Since $\rho(\lambda)>0$ is equivalent to the existence of a ground state, this proves absence at large coupling. The same expansion yields monotonicity of $\rho$ in $|\lambda|$ and hence a unique critical $\lambda_0$.

Load-bearing premise

The comparison between the one-sided and two-sided percolation models needs the distance bound $|\varphi(t)-\varphi(s)|\ge|t-s|/4$ for all admissible pairs; if that inequality fails, the stochastic domination argument that produces long range order collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • There exists a finite critical coupling $\lambda_0$ such that $H_\lambda$ has a ground state for $|\lambda|<\lambda_0$ and none for $|\lambda|>\lambda_0$; the value at $\lambda_0$ itself is left open.
  • The vacuum overlap obeys the explicit upper bound $\rho(\lambda)\le\exp(-\frac{\lambda^2}{4}\int_0^\infty\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}t|v(k)|^2e^{-t(\omega(k)+2)}dk\,dt)$, so the would-be ground state becomes macroscopically bosonic at large coupling.
  • For the standard example $\omega(k)=|k|$, $|v(k)|\sim|k|^{-\delta}$, the theorem applies exactly in the infrared-divergent regime $\delta\in[\frac{d}{2}-1,\frac{d}{2}-\frac12)$, including the physically relevant case $d=3$, $\delta=\frac12$.
  • Sufficient criteria for existence and absence of ground states are unified in terms of Ising correlation functions: finite integrated susceptibility gives existence, long range order gives absence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same percolation-based route may apply to translation-invariant polaron models, where absence of ground states at large total momentum is conjectured; the correlation-function criterion developed here is a plausible template for such proofs.
  • If the phase transition in the one-sided continuum Ising model is sharp in the sense of finite susceptibility below the critical $\alpha$, then the critical coupling $\lambda_0$ for the spin boson model would coincide with the KMS phase-transition point found in earlier work; the paper notes the missing connection, and the main obstacle is likely the boundary effects in the long-range model.
  • Since the paper omits explicit numerical values for $\lambda_0$, a testable extension is to compute the two-point function $\tau_{\alpha,1}(t)$ in Monte Carlo simulations for $g(t)=(1+t^2)^{-1}$; the onset of long range order would give an estimate of the critical $\alpha$, hence of $\lambda_0$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper proves absence of ground states for the infrared-divergent spin boson model at large coupling, and combines this with known small-coupling existence results to establish a unique phase transition in the coupling strength. The main technical steps are: an exact expansion of the vacuum overlap ρ(λ) in terms of correlation functions of a one-sided continuum Ising model (Theorem 3.4); a criterion showing that long-range order in that Ising model implies ρ(λ)=0 when v/ω is not square-integrable (Corollary 3.5); and a proof of long-range order at large coupling using a continuum percolation representation and a comparison between one-sided and two-sided site-bond percolation models (Theorem 4.1). The central result is Theorem 2.9, which states that under the infrared decay condition ∫ e^{-tω}|v|² dk ≥ C(1+t²)^{-1}, the critical coupling λ₀ is finite.

Significance. If correct, the paper resolves a conjecture in the spectral theory of the spin boson model and gives the first rigorous proof of a coupling-driven ground-state phase transition in this model. The vacuum overlap expansion, the derivation of the identity ρ=lim Z²/Z, and the detailed proof of convergence from discrete to continuum percolation are valuable technical contributions in their own right. The paper is self-contained modulo standard external results in percolation theory and prior work on existence criteria for ground states, and it also provides an explicit upper bound on the vacuum overlap. The central strategy is coherent and the main claims are supported by the argument as written.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.1] The inequality |φ(t)-φ(s)| ≥ |t-s|/4 is essential for the comparison of the one-sided and two-sided percolation models, but it is asserted without proof. Because the extension φ is discontinuous at integers, this is not immediate; please add a short case check or a reference. In particular, for the half-open definition φ(t)=t-n on [2n,2n+1) and φ(t)=n-t on [2n+1,2n+2), the example s=2.5, t=5.5 gives φ(s)=1.5 and φ(t)=-3.5, so the inequality holds; nevertheless, a proof should be supplied to rule out other cases.
  2. [Section 4, around Eq. (4.11)] The constant c in p_{φ(n),φ(m)}(α/c) ≤ p_{n,m}(α) is not specified. For g(t)=C/(1+t²), the pointwise bound |φ(t)-φ(s)| ≥ |t-s|/4 yields g(φ(t)-φ(s)) ≤ 16 g(t-s), so c=16 suffices; this should be written out explicitly.
  3. [Section 4, around Eqs. (4.7)-(4.11)] The vertex-alive comparison is not stated among the large-α conditions. Besides α/c>β and p_{0,2}(α)>p_{0,1}(β), one also needs p₀(α)≥p₀(β); since p₀(α)↑1 as α→∞, this is harmless, but it should be included.
  4. [Lemma 4.3 and Proposition A.5] The notation P_{α,T,N} is used both for the FK measure and for the independent percolation measure in (4.2)-(4.5); this overloaded notation makes the argument harder to follow. Distinct symbols such as P^{FK} and P^{ind} would be clearer.
  5. [Appendix A, Proposition A.5] The subscript 'T N' in P_{α,T,T N}(0↔n) appears to be a typo for P_{α,T,N}(0↔n).
  6. [Section 2.1, Eq. (2.1)] The displayed relative bound is missing arguments on the right-hand side: the terms ε||dΓ(A)|| and ε^{-1}||(1+A^{-1/2})|| should act on ψ.
  7. [Section 3, after Eq. (3.5)] The equality ~E_{α,2T}[∏ X_{s_i}X_{t_i}] = ~E_{α,2T}[∏ X_{s_i}X_{t_i}|X_T=1] uses spin-flip symmetry; a sentence explaining this step would improve readability.
  8. [Section 4, footnote 1] The application of [NS86] to the site-bond model is terse. Please spell out that one can first choose the long-range edge probabilities large enough, then take p₀ and p_{0,1} close to 1, so that the existence of a percolating β follows by monotonicity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the vacuum-overlap expansion and long-range-order argument are self-contained; cited prior results are independently published, and the alleged phi-map counterexample does not invalidate the one-sided/two-sided comparison.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 3.4 derives the vacuum-overlap expansion directly: equation (3.10) is obtained by a series expansion and monotone convergence, and the identity rho(lambda) = lim Z^2/Z is then proved inside the paper via the spectral theorem, Lemma 3.1, and Remark 2.3, even though the identity is also attributed to [LHB20, BP22]. That self-citation is not load-bearing because a full proof is included. Lemma 3.2 uses the discrete-to-continuum scaling limit from [HHS22a, Prop. 4.1]; despite author overlap, that is a published, peer-reviewed theorem with an independent proof, and it does not assume the target result. Similarly, Proposition 2.8 and Proposition 3.6 rely on the earlier articles [HHS21, HHS22b], but these provide the known small-coupling existence side and are not the new prediction of this paper; the phase-transition statement explicitly treats small-coupling existence as prior knowledge. The long-range-order proof in Theorem 4.1 uses external percolation results [NS86, ACCN88, AKN87], and Appendix A proves the needed continuum-percolation convergence rather than importing it. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no input is defined in terms of the output. The reader's proposed circularity-adjacent objection to the phi-map comparison does not land: phi is defined on half-open intervals and is discontinuous at integers, so phi(2.5)=1.5 and phi(5.5)=-3.5, giving |phi(5.5)-phi(2.5)|=5.0 >= |5.5-2.5|/4. The inequality supports the edge comparison with a constant c=16 because g(phi(t)-phi(s)) <= 16 g(t-s); the |n-m|=2 case is handled separately. The paper's limitations, such as Remark 3.7 and the open connection to Spohn's critical coupling, are honestly stated and do not conceal a circular step. Overall, the derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The continuum Ising model and percolation are mathematical tools. The main axioms are the model assumptions and the slow-decay condition; the remaining ingredients are standard external results from statistical mechanics and percolation theory.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Hypothesis A: ω>0 a.e., v∈L^2(R^d), and ω^{-1/2}v∈L^2(R^d).
    Defines the class of models and ensures self-adjointness of H_λ via Kato-Rellich; stated in Section 2.2.
  • domain assumption Slow decay condition ∫ e^{-tω}|v|^2 ≥ C(1+t^2)^{-1} for all t>0.
    The main hypothesis of Theorem 2.9 that triggers non-existence of ground states; stated in Section 2.3.
  • standard math GKS inequalities for the continuum Ising model.
    Proved in Lemma 3.2 using the discrete approximation and the scaling limit from [SD85, HHS22a].
  • standard math Existence of a phase transition in translation-invariant long-range percolation on Z ([NS86]).
    Used in Theorem 4.1 to obtain Q_{β,d}(0↔∞)>0 for some β.
  • standard math FK representation and stochastic domination for discrete long-range Ising models ([ACCN88]).
    Used in Lemma 4.3 to bound the Ising two-point function by a percolation connection probability.
  • standard math Convergence of discrete to continuum percolation (proved in Appendix A).
    Relies on standard results on convergence of point processes (Kallenberg, Last-Penrose).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Ising Phase Transition in the Infrared-Divergent Spin Boson Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WOZY6VXF

@misc{pith2026250119362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Ising Phase Transition in the Infrared-Divergent Spin Boson Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WOZY6VXF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19362}
}
abstract

We prove absence of ground states in the infrared-divergent spin boson model at large coupling. Our key argument reduces the proof to verifying long range order in the dual one-dimensional continuum Ising model, i.e., to showing that the respective two point function is lower bounded by a strictly positive constant. We can then use known results from percolation theory to establish long range order at large coupling. Combined with the known existence of ground states at small coupling, our result proves that the spin boson model undergoes a phase transition with respect to the coupling strength. We also present an expansion for the vacuum overlap of the spin boson ground state in terms of the Ising $n$-point functions, which implies that the phase transition is unique, i.e., that there is a critical coupling constant below which a ground state exists and above which none can exist.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Ultraviolet Renormalization of Spin Boson Models I. Normal and 2-Nilpotent Interactions

    math-ph 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper proves that generalized spin-boson models with normal or 2-nilpotent interactions can be ultraviolet renormalized, with norm resolvent convergence of the regularized Hamiltonians to an explicitly constructed...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Ground State Energy of The Massless Spin-Boson Model

    A. Abdesselam. The Ground State Energy of the Massless Spin-Boson Model. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 12(7):1321--1347, 2011, arXiv:1005.4366 http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.4366 . doi:10.1007/s00023-011-0103-6

  2. [2]

    Aizenman, D

    M. Aizenman, D. J. Barsky, and R. Fern \'a ndez. The Phase Transition in a General Class of I sing-Type Models is Sharp. J. Stat. Phys. , 47(3-4):343--374, 1987. doi:10.1007/BF01007515

  3. [3]

    Aizenman, J

    M. Aizenman, J. T. Chayes, L. Chayes, and C. M. Newman. Discontinuity of the magnetization in one-dimensional 1/|x-y|^2 I sing and P otts models. J. Stat. Phys. , 50(1):1--40, 1988. doi:10.1007/BF01022985

  4. [4]

    Arai and M

    A. Arai and M. Hirokawa. On the Existence and Uniqueness of Ground States of the Spin-Boson H amiltonian. Hokkaido Univ. Prepr. Ser. Math. , 309:2--20, 1995. doi:10.14943/83456

  5. [5]

    Aizenman, H

    M. Aizenman, H. Kesten, and C. M. Newman. Uniqueness of the Infinite Cluster and Continuity of Connectivity Functions for Short and Long Range Percolation. Commun. Math. Phys. , 111(4):505--531, 1987. doi:10.1007/BF01219071

  6. [6]

    A. Arai. Analysis on F ock Spaces and Mathematical Theory of Quantum Fields . World Scientific, New Jersey, 2018. doi:10.1142/10367

  7. [7]

    V. Bach, M. Ballesteros, M. K \"o nenberg, and L. Menrath. Existence of ground state eigenvalues for the spin–boson model with critical infrared divergence and multiscale analysis. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 453(2):773--797, 2017, arXiv:1605.08348 http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08348 . doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.03.075

  8. [8]

    Bachmann, D.-A

    S. Bachmann, D.-A. Deckert, and A. Pizzo. The mass shell of the N elson model without cut-offs. J. Funct. Anal. , 263(5):1224--1282, 2012, arXiv:1104.3271 http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3271 . doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2012.04.021

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    V. Bach, J. Fr \"o hlich, and I. M. Sigal. Renormalization Group Analysis of Spectral Problems in Quantum Field Theory. Adv. Math. , 137(2):205--298, 1998. doi:10.1006/aima.1998.1733

  2. [10]

    Bloch and A

    F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck. Note on the Radiation Field of the Electron. Phys. Rev. , 52(2):54--59, 1937. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.52.54

  3. [11]

    Betz and S

    V. Betz and S. Polzer. A Functional Central Limit Theorem for Polaron Path Measures. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. , 75(11):2345--2392, 2022, arXiv:2106.06447 http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.06447 . doi:10.1002/cpa.22080

  4. [12]

    Betz and D

    V. Betz and D. Ueltschi. Spatial Random Permutations and Infinite Cycles. Commun. Math. Phys. , 285(2):469--501, 2009, arXiv:0711.1188 http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.1188 . doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0584-4

  5. [13]

    T. Chen. Infrared renormalization in non-relativistic QED and scaling criticality. J. Funct. Anal. , 254(10):2555--2647, 2008, arXiv:math-ph/0601010 http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0601010 . doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2008.01.001

  6. [14]

    T. N. Dam. Absence of Ground States in the Translation Invariant Massless N elson Model. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 21(8):2655--2679, 2020, arXiv:1808.00088 http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00088 . doi:10.1007/s00023-020-00928-y

  7. [15]

    Duminil-Copin and V

    H. Duminil-Copin and V. Tassion. A New Proof of the Sharpness of the Phase Transition for B ernoulli Percolation and the I sing Model. Commun. Math. Phys. , 343(2):725--745, 2016, arXiv:1502.03050 http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.03050 . doi:10.1007/s00220-015-2480-z

  8. [16]

    Derezi\' n ski and C

    J. Derezi\' n ski and C. G \' e rard. Scattering theory of infrared divergent P auli- F ierz H amiltonians. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 5(3):523--577, 2004. doi:10.1007/s00023-004-0177-5

  9. [17]

    T. N. Dam and B. Hinrichs. Absence of ground states in the renormalized massless translation-invariant N elson model. Rev. Math. Phys. , 34(10):2250033, 2022, arXiv:1909.07661 http://arxiv.org/abs/1909.07661 . doi:10.1142/S0129055X22500337

  10. [18]

    T. N. Dam and J. S. M ller. Asymptotics in Spin-Boson type models. Commun. Math. Phys. , 374(3):1389--1415, 2020, arXiv:1808.00085 http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.00085 . doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03685-5

  11. [19]

    T. N. Dam and J. S. M ller. Spin-Boson type models analysed using symmetries. Kyoto J. Math. , 60(4):1261--1332, 2020, arXiv:1803.05812 http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05812 . doi:10.1215/21562261-2019-0062

  12. [20]

    V. J. Emery and A. Luther. Low-temperature properties of the K ondo H amiltonian. Phys. Rev. B , 9(1):215--226, 1974. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.9.215

  13. [21]

    Fannes and B

    M. Fannes and B. Nachtergaele. Translating the spin-boson model into a classical system. J. Math. Phys. , 29(10):2288--2293, 1988. doi:10.1063/1.528109

  14. [22]

    Fr \"o hlich

    H. Fr \"o hlich. Electrons in Lattice Fields. Adv. Phys. , 3(11):325--361, 1954. doi:10.1080/00018735400101213

  15. [23]

    Fr \" o hlich

    J. Fr \" o hlich. On the infrared problem in a model of scalar electrons and massless scalar bosons. Ann. de l'Inst. Henri Poincar\' e , 19(1):1--103, 1973

  16. [24]

    Fr\" o hlich and T

    J. Fr\" o hlich and T. Spencer. The Phase Transition in the One-Dimensional I sing Model with 1/r^ 2 Interaction Energy. Commun. Math. Phys. , 84(1):87--101, 1982. doi:10.1007/BF01208373

  17. [25]

    Friedli and Y

    S. Friedli and Y. Velenik. Statistical mechanics of lattice systems: A Concrete Mathematical Introduction . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. doi:10.1017/9781316882603

  18. [26]

    Enrico Fermi

    F. Grusdt and E. Demler. New theoretical approaches to B ose polarons. In Quantum Matter at Ultralow Temperatures , volume 191 of Proceedings of the international school of physics "Enrico Fermi" , pages 325--411, 2016, arXiv:1510.04934 http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.04934 . doi:10...

  19. [27]

    G \' e rard

    C. G \' e rard. On the Existence of Ground States for Massless P auli- F ierz H amiltonians. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 1(3):443--459, 2000. doi:10.1007/s000230050002

  20. [28]

    Griesemer, E

    M. Griesemer, E. Lieb, and M. Loss. Ground states in non-relativistic quantum electrodynamics. Invent. math. , 145(3):557–595, 2001, arXiv:math-ph/0007014 http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0007014 . doi:10.1007/s002220100159

  21. [29]

    Hasler and I

    D. Hasler and I. Herbst. Absence of Ground States for a Class of Translation Invariant Models of Non-relativistic QED. Commun. Math. Phys. , 279(3):769--787, 2008, arXiv:math-ph/0702096 http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0702096 . doi:10.1007/s00220-008-0444-2

  22. [30]

    Hasler and I

    D. Hasler and I. Herbst. Ground States in the Spin Boson Model. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 12(4):621--677, 2011, arXiv:1003.5923 http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5923 . doi:10.1007/s00023-011-0091-6

  23. [31]

    Hirokawa, F

    M. Hirokawa, F. Hiroshima, and J. L o rinczi. Spin-boson model through a P oisson-driven stochastic process. Math. Z. , 277(3):1165--1198, 2014, arXiv:1209.5521 http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.5521 . doi:10.1007/s00209-014-1299-1

  24. [32]

    Hasler, B

    D. Hasler, B. Hinrichs, and O. Siebert. On Existence of Ground States in the Spin Boson Model. Commun. Math. Phys. , 388(1):419--433, 2021, arXiv:2102.13373 http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.13373 . doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04185-w

  25. [33]

    Hasler, B

    D. Hasler, B. Hinrichs, and O. Siebert. Correlation bound for a one-dimensional continuous long-range I sing model. Stoch. Proc. Appl. , 146:60--79, 2022, arXiv:2104.03013 http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.03013 . doi:10.1016/j.spa.2021.12.010

  26. [34]

    Hasler, B

    D. Hasler, B. Hinrichs, and O. Siebert. FKN Formula and Ground State Energy for the Spin Boson Model with External Magnetic Field. Ann. Henri Poincar\'e , 23(8):2819--2853, 2022, arXiv:2106.08659 http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08659 . doi:10.1007/s00023-022-01160-6

  27. [35]

    Hasler, B

    D. Hasler, B. Hinrichs, and O. Siebert. Non- F ock ground states in the translation-invariant N elson model revisited non-perturbatively. J. Funct. Anal. , 286(7):110319, 2024, arXiv:2302.06998 http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06998 . doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2024.110319

  28. [36]

    Hinrichs

    B. Hinrichs. Existence of Ground States for Infrared-Critical Models of Quantum Field Theory . PhD thesis, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 2022. doi:10.22032/dbt.51516

  29. [37]

    Hinrichs

    B. Hinrichs. Existence of Ground States in the Infrared-Critial Spin Boson Model. In Mathematical Aspects of Quantum Fields and Related Topics , volume 2235 of RIMS K\^oky\^uroku , pages 60--72, 2022, arXiv:2204.00287 http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.00287

  30. [38]

    Hinrichs and J

    B. Hinrichs and J. Lampart. A Lower Bound on the Critical Momentum of an Impurity in a Bose--Einstein Condensate. C.\,R. Math. , 362:1399--1412, 2024, arXiv:2311.05361 http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05361 . doi:10.5802/crmath.652

  31. [39]

    Hinrichs, J

    B. Hinrichs, J. Lampart, and J. Valent \'i n Mart \'i n. Ultraviolet Renormalization of Spin Boson Models I. Normal and 2-Nilpotent Interactions. In Preparation

  32. [40]

    Hiroshima and O

    F. Hiroshima and O. Matte. Ground states and their associated path measures in the renormalized N elson model. Rev. Math. Phys. , 34(2):2250002, 2022, arXiv:1903.12024 http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12024 . doi:10.1142/S0129055X22500027

  33. [41]

    Hasler and O

    D. Hasler and O. Siebert. Ground States for translationally invariant P auli- F ierz Models at zero Momentum. J. Funct. Anal. , 284(1):109725, 2023, arXiv:2007.01250 http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01250 . doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2022.109725

  34. [42]

    J. Z. Imbrie and C. M. Newman. An intermediate phase with slow decay of correlations in one-dimensional 1/|x-y|^2 percolation, I sing and P otts models. Comm. Math. Phys. , 118(2):303--336, 1988. doi:10.1007/BF01218582

  35. [43]

    Kallenberg

    O. Kallenberg. Characterization and convergence of random measures and point processes. Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verw. Gebiete , 27:9--21, 1973. doi:10.1007/BF00736004

  36. [44]

    Kallenberg

    O. Kallenberg. Random Measures, Theory and Applications , volume 77 of Probability Theory and Stochastic Modelling . Springer, Cham, 2017. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41598-7

  37. [45]

    L o rinczi, F

    J. L o rinczi, F. Hiroshima, and V. Betz. Feynman- K ac-Type Theorems and G ibbs Measures on Path Space. Volume 1: Feynman-Kac-Type Formulae and Gibbs Measures , volume 34/1 of De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics . De Gruyter, Berlin, 2nd edition, 2020. doi:10.1515/9783110330397...

  38. [46]

    Lill and D

    S. Lill and D. Lonigro. Self-adjointness and domain of generalized spin-boson models with mild ultraviolet divergences. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2307.14727 http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14727

  39. [47]

    L o rinczi, R

    J. L o rinczi, R. A. Minlos, and H. Spohn. The Infrared Behaviour in N elson's Model of a Quantum Particle Coupled to a Massless Scalar Field. Ann. Henri Poincar\' e , 3(2):269--295, 2002, arXiv:math-ph/0011043 http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0011043 . doi:10.1007/s00023-002-8617-6

  40. [48]

    D. Lonigro. Generalized spin-boson models with non-normalizable form factors. J. Math. Phys. , 63(7):072105, 2022, arXiv:2111.06121 http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06121 . doi:10.1063/5.0085576

  41. [49]

    Last and M

    G. Last and M. Penrose. Lectures on the P oisson process , volume 7 of Institute of Mathematical Statistics Textbooks . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. doi:10.1017/9781316104477

  42. [50]

    J. S. M ller. The Polaron Revisited. Rev. Math. Phys. , 18(5):485--517, 2006. doi:10.1142/S0129055X0600267X

  43. [51]

    E. Nelson. Interaction of Nonrelativistic Particles with a Quantized Scalar Field. J. Math. Phys. , 5(9):1190--1197, 1964. doi:10.1063/1.1704225

  44. [52]

    C. M. Newman and L. S. Schulman. One Dimensional 1/|j-i|^s Percolation Models: The Existence of a Transition for s 2 . Commun. Math. Phys. , 104(4):547--571, 1986. doi:10.1007/BF01211064

  45. [53]

    K. R. Parthasarathy. An Introduction to Quantum Stochastic Calculus , volume 85 of Monographs in Mathematics . Birkh\" a user, Basel, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-0348-0566-7

  46. [54]

    S. Polzer. Renewal approach for the energy--momentum relation of the F r\" o hlich polaron. Lett. Math. Phys. , 113(4):90, 2023, arXiv:2206.14425 http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.14425 . doi:10.1007/s11005-023-01711-w

  47. [55]

    Spohn and R

    H. Spohn and R. D\"umcke. Quantum tunneling with dissipation and the I sing model over R R . J. Stat. Phys. , 41(3):389--423, 1985. doi:10.1007/BF01009015

  48. [56]

    H. Spohn. Ground State(s) of the Spin-Boson H amiltonian. Commun. Math. Phys. , 123(2):277--304, 1989. doi:10.1007/BF01238859

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.