Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 103 references

Search for dark matter production in association with bottom quarks and a lepton pair in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A first dedicated search for dark matter produced with bottom quarks and a Z boson at a hadron collider finds no signal and sets cross-section limits down to 10^-3 pb.

desk verdict First dedicated CMS probe of the bb+Z(ll)+MET channel: a solid, careful search whose main soft spot is a validation gap in the DY pTmiss correction. read the letter →

arxiv 2510.12396 v2 pith:WQ6IXJHK submitted 2025-10-14 hep-ex

CMS Collaboration This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords darkmatterpseudoscalarmediator2HDM+amissingtransversemomentumbottom-quarkjetsZbosonHiggscollidersearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a new dark-matter production channel—bottom-quark pairs recoiling against a leptonically decaying Z boson and large missing transverse momentum, with the missing momentum originating from a pseudoscalar mediator decaying into dark matter—can be isolated from standard model backgrounds, and that no excess is observed in the full 138 fb^-1 dataset. The channel matters because it reaches a region of the 2HDM+a parameter space, especially large tan-beta, that other dark-matter and flavor searches cannot reach, including the region favored by a dark-matter interpretation of the galactic-center gamma-ray excess. The paper's central result is the first experimental constraint on the product sigma(pp->bbH) x B(H->Za) x B(Z->ll) x B(a->chi chi), with observed 95% confidence-level upper limits falling from about 10^-2 pb for a 400 GeV heavy scalar to about 10^-3 pb for a 2000 GeV heavy scalar. These limits exclude heavy-scalar masses up to roughly 900 GeV for small mediator masses in the benchmark model, and they exclude a substantial part of the parameter space preferred by the observed dark-matter relic density.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the event-selection plus multivariate discriminant: a loose requirement of at least one b-tagged jet is combined with a Z-mass window on an opposite-sign same-flavor dilepton pair and a missing-transverse-momentum threshold, and then a fully connected neural network (the MLP, binned into 17 MLP4 score intervals) combines kinematic variables such as pT^miss, the transverse mass mT, and mT2 to separate signal from background. Backgrounds are controlled with four single-bin control regions for Drell-Yan, top-quark pair, WZ, and ZZ production, an analytical kinematic solver vetoes dileptonic top-quark events, and the Drell-Yan missing-momentum scale and resolution are co

What would settle it

The central null result would be weakened if, in a dedicated validation region requiring at least one b-tagged jet, a Z-like dilepton pair, no extra leptons, and 300 < pT^miss < 500 GeV, the ratio of observed events to the corrected prediction deviated from unity by more than the quoted uncertainty.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery claim is a null result: in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, events with an opposite-sign same-flavor lepton pair near the Z mass, at least one b-tagged jet, and large missing transverse momentum agree with standard model predictions. The paper establishes the first dedicated collider search for this final state and reports observed 95% CL upper limits on sigma(pp->bbH) B(H->Za) B(Z->ll) B(a->chi chi) ranging from about 10^-2 pb at mH = 400 GeV to about 10^-3 pb at mH = 2000 GeV. In the benchmark 2HDM+a interpretation, the results exclude heavy scalar masses up to about 900 GeV for small pseudoscalar masses, and up to about 1.1 TeV for tan-beta near 25, covering a meaningful

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes that the data-driven correction to the Drell-Yan missing-momentum scale and resolution, derived at low missing momentum and checked in a region without b jets, remains valid in the signal region where missing momentum is large and at least one b jet is present.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The quoted upper limits provide the first model-independent cross-section bounds for the bb + Z + missing-momentum final state, applicable to any model with a heavy scalar decaying to Z plus invisible particles in association with bottom quarks.
  • In the benchmark 2HDM+a scenario, heavy scalar masses up to about 900 GeV are excluded for small pseudoscalar masses, closing part of the parameter space favored by dark-matter relic-density calculations.
  • The analysis excludes low mediator masses over a broad range of the mixing angle sin(theta), leaving only very small and very large values of sin(theta) uncovered.
  • The search is most sensitive to semi-boosted topologies with mH - ma near 1 TeV, while compressed mass configurations and configurations with very large mass splittings remain less constrained.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit is that including final states where the Z decays to tau leptons, or where the dilepton pair arises from a non-resonant spectrum, could cover configurations where the present lepton selection loses efficiency.
  • Because the dominant limitations come from the normalization uncertainties of the WZ and ZZ backgrounds, a future analysis could improve sensitivity with a dedicated diboson-enriched control region or by exploiting jet substructure for more boosted topologies.
  • The tabulated model-independent results allow reinterpretation in other pseudoscalar-mediator or two-Higgs-doublet scenarios beyond the benchmark, which is a natural follow-up given the cosmological motivation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a search for dark matter produced in association with b quarks and a lepton pair in 138 fb^-1 of 13 TeV CMS data, using the 2HDM+a model with the process pp -> bbH, H -> Za, Z -> ll, a -> chichi. A multivariate MLP discriminant is trained on simulated signal and background events, and a profile-likelihood fit combines a 17-bin signal region with four control regions (DY, tt, WZ, ZZ) to constrain background normalizations. A data-driven correction to the DY pTmiss scale and resolution is derived in a low-pTmiss sideband and applied to the signal region. The observations are consistent with the standard-model expectation, and 95% CL upper limits are set on sigma(pp->bbH) B(H->Za) B(Z->ll) B(a->chichi) in the range 10^-2 to 10^-3 pb for mH = 400-2000 GeV. The results are interpreted as constraints on the 2HDM+a parameter space and compared with the region favored by the relic-density calculation.

Significance. If the result holds, this is the first dedicated experimental search for this specific bbZ(ll)+pTmiss signature, and it probes regions of the 2HDM+a parameter space (in particular high tan(beta)) that are motivated by the gamma-ray galactic center excess and are not directly covered by earlier mono-Z or mono-H searches. The analysis is careful and thorough: it uses the full Run 2 dataset, applies a multivariate discriminant, enumerates systematic uncertainties in detail, provides control-region validation plots, and makes tabulated results available in HEPData. The main strengths are the explicit signal model, the use of data-driven background normalizations with cross-checked control regions, and the public record of the results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6] The data-driven correction to the DY pTmiss scale and resolution is derived in a sideband with pTmiss < 65 GeV and then extrapolated to the signal region. The only stated verification is in a region with no b jets and pTmiss < 300 GeV (Section 6). This does not directly validate the correction in the SR phase space, which requires Nb >= 1 and extends to pTmiss values well above 300 GeV. Because the MLP discriminant uses pTmiss and mT(ell,ell,pTmiss) as leading inputs (Section 5.3), a miscalibration of the DY tail would directly reshape the SR templates and thereby shift the derived limits, especially for low-mH signals that populate the lower MLP4 bins. Please either provide a validation in a b-enriched region with higher pTmiss, or quantify the uncertainty from this extrapolation and show its effect on the final limits.
  2. [Section 8] The background-only fit changes the WZ and ZZ normalizations by +101% and +113%, respectively. These processes populate the high-MLP4 (signal-like) bins, and the paper states that their normalization uncertainties are among the most important systematics. The WZ and ZZ control regions are single-bin, so they constrain the overall normalization but not the shape of the MLP4 distribution in the SR. Given the very large correction factors, additional validation is needed to demonstrate that the shape modeling in the b-enriched phase space is reliable. Please show pre-fit and post-fit comparisons in finer-grained b-enriched CRs, or otherwise discuss how the large k-factors are constrained by the data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.3] The definition of the MLP4 score in Eq. (4) appears to contain a typographical issue: the floor function is not explicitly written. Please clarify the transformation.
  2. [Section 8.1 / Figure 7] The y-axis of Figure 7 is described as the upper limit on sigmaB but the scaling by arbitrary factors (x10^-n) is only noted in the caption. It would be clearer to label each panel with the absolute scale or indicate the scaling directly on the axis.
  3. [References] The benchmark parameters in Eq. (1) are cited to Refs. [3,52], but readers may benefit from a direct reference to the specific 2HDM+a parameter scan in which this benchmark was first used. Please check whether a more precise citation is available.
  4. [Section 6] The validation of the DY Nb=0/Nb>=1 normalization consistency is described only in words. A figure or table showing the compatibility of the ratios in the two categories would strengthen this cross-check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the search derives limits from an externally defined 2HDM+a model, with backgrounds normalized in disjoint control regions and the only data-driven correction being a standard auxiliary measurement.

full rationale

The analysis is a search for a BSM signal in an externally defined 2HDM+a model. The benchmark signal parameters (Eq. 1) are taken from prior literature (Refs. [3], [51], [52]), not fitted to the data; the signal is simulated with MG5 at fixed masses and couplings. Background normalizations are fitted in control regions that are disjoint from the signal region (DY CR requires Nb=0 and pTmiss<140 GeV; tt, WZ, ZZ CRs have different final-state requirements), so the SR counts are not equal to the fit by construction. The one data-driven calibration, the DY pTmiss recoil correction, is derived in a sideband with pTmiss<65 GeV and propagated to the SR; this is a standard auxiliary measurement and the SR is not used to derive it, so it is not a fitted-input-called-prediction step. The paper explicitly notes the extrapolation is verified only in a region with no b jets and pTmiss<300 GeV; this is a validation gap (a robustness risk), not a circularity, because the correction is not an ansatz that already contains the SR result. The relic-density comparison uses an independent MadDM calculation. No uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation is invoked: the only comparison to a prior CMS search [28] is an external cross-check of the excluded mass range. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained with respect to the final limits.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities; it searches for the established H, a, and chi fields of the 2HDM+a model. The free parameters are benchmark-model choices and fit nuisance parameters, not new physical constants fitted to the target result. No independent falsifiable handle is created beyond the search limits themselves.

free parameters (3)
  • 2HDM+a benchmark parameters = m_chi=45 GeV, tan(beta)=11, sin(theta)=0.35, lambda_3=lambda_P1=lambda_P2=0.25, y_chi=1
    Benchmark scenario in Eq. (1), taken from prior literature (Refs. [3,14,51,52]). Not fitted to this data, but all signal simulations and model exclusions are conditional on these choices.
  • Background normalization parameters (DY, tt, WZ, ZZ) = DY +10%, tt +8%, WZ +101%, ZZ +113% relative to pre-fit predictions
    Unconstrained normalization parameters fitted to control regions in the maximum-likelihood fit (Section 8). They affect the background model used to derive limits.
  • DY pTmiss correction parameters (double Gaussian) = not public; derived in sideband with pTmiss<65 GeV
    Parameterized double-Gaussian correction to DY pTmiss scale/resolution fitted in a sideband and extrapolated to the signal region (Section 6).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Standard Model is the correct low-energy description of background processes.
    All backgrounds are generated with standard SM MC samples (DY, tt, single top, diboson, minor processes), and the fit assumes these are the only background sources.
  • domain assumption The 2HDM+a model correctly describes signal production and decay kinematics.
    Signal samples are generated with MG5 using a dedicated 2HDM+a model (Ref. [51]); the interpretation layer assumes this model and the benchmark parameter choices.
  • domain assumption The GEANT4-based CMS detector simulation, after data-to-simulation corrections, accurately models the detector response.
    All MC samples are passed through full CMS simulation; corrections are applied for trigger, lepton, jet, b-tag, and pTmiss response. The analysis relies on this simulation for signal shapes and part of the background prediction.
  • domain assumption The narrow-width approximation for the H and a resonances is valid in the considered parameter space.
    Explicitly assumed in Section 8.1 when converting limits to the (mH, ma) plane; the paper states the widths were checked to validate this approximation.
  • standard math The asymptotic CLs method yields valid 95% confidence intervals.
    Upper limits are computed with the asymptotic approximation of CLs (Refs. [98,99]), a standard statistical procedure.
  • domain assumption NNPDF3.1 NNLO PDFs and the PYTHIA CP5 tune adequately model initial-state partons and hadronization.
    Used for all signal and background simulations; PDF and scale uncertainties are estimated but the central predictions rely on these choices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Search for dark matter production in association with bottom quarks and a lepton pair in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WQ6IXJHK

@misc{pith2026251012396,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Search for dark matter production in association with bottom quarks and a lepton pair in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrts$ = 13 TeV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WQ6IXJHK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2510.12396}
}
abstract

A search is performed for dark matter produced in association with bottom quarks and a pair of electrons or muons in data collected with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to 138 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. For the first time at the LHC, the associated production of a bottom quark-antiquark pair and a new heavy neutral Higgs boson (H) that subsequently decays into a leptonically decaying Z boson and a pseudoscalar (a) is explored. The latter acts as a dark matter mediator in the context of the two Higgs doublet model plus a pseudoscalar (2HDM+a). Multivariate techniques that target a wide range of mass configurations for the H and a particles are used. The observations are consistent with the expectations from standard model processes. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on the product of cross section and branching fraction of the new particles, ranging from 10$^{-2}$ pb for an H mass of 400 GeV to 10$^{-3}$ pb for an H mass of 2000 GeV. Constraints on the parameter space of a benchmark 2HDM+a model are derived and compared with expectations in the context of cosmological predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2510.12396 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Example diagram at leading order for the production of a heavy pseudoscalar medi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Normalized distributions in p miss T (upper left), m ℓℓ,p miss T T (upper right), m ℓℓ T2 (lower left), and ∆R ℓℓ (lower right) in the SR for the main background processes (solid lines) and signals with high (dark gray dashed line) and low (light gray dashed line) mH values. The vertical bars at the center of the bins represent the statistical uncertainty in the predictions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the requirements on the SR and CRs. All requirements are applied on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distributions in p miss T for the DY (upper left), tt (upper right), WZ (lower left), and ZZ (lower right) CRs. In the WZ and ZZ CRs, p miss T is obtained by removing the additional leptons from the calculation. The distributions are shown after performing a background…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Distributions in the MLP4 score for the DY (upper left), t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Main statistical discriminant of the analysis used to extract the signal after having [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Observed and expected upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the signal cross sec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Excluded regions in the parameter space of the 2HDM+a. The solid lines encompass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cosmological constraints on the properties of weakly interacting massive particles

    G. Steigman and M. S. Turner, “Cosmological constraints on the properties of weakly interacting massive particles”,Nucl. Phys. B253(1985) 375, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90537-1

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90537-1 1985

  2. [2]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searches — current status and future prospects

    L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, “WIMP dark matter candidates and searches — current status and future prospects”,Rept. Prog. Phys.81(2018) 066201, doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aab913,arXiv:1707.06277

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Probing the pseudoscalar portal to dark matter via ¯bbZ(→ℓℓ)+̸E T : From the LHC to the galactic center excess

    P . Tunney, J. M. No, and M. Fairbairn, “Probing the pseudoscalar portal to dark matter via ¯bbZ(→ℓℓ)+̸E T : From the LHC to the galactic center excess”,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 095020,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.095020,arXiv:1705.09670

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints”,Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031, arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment

    CMS Collaboration, “Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment”,Phys. Rep.(2024) 448,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.013,arXiv:2405.13778. References 23

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Dark matter searches at accelerators

    A. De Roeck, “Dark matter searches at accelerators”,Nucl. Phys. B1003(2024) 116480, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116480

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Constraints on simplified dark matter models involving an s-channel mediator with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Constraints on simplified dark matter models involving an s-channel mediator with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 1102,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13215-5, arXiv:2404.15930

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Combination and summary of ATLAS dark matter searches interpreted in a 2HDM with a pseudo-scalar mediator using 139 fb−1 of √s=13 TeV pp collision data

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Combination and summary of ATLAS dark matter searches interpreted in a 2HDM with a pseudo-scalar mediator using 139 fb−1 of √s=13 TeV pp collision data”,Sci. Bull.69(2024) 3005,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2024.06.003, arXiv:2306.00641

    arXiv 2024

Show all 103 references
  1. [9]

    FERMI-LAT observations of high-energyγ-ray emission toward the galatic center

    Fermi-LAT Collaboration, “FERMI-LAT observations of high-energyγ-ray emission toward the galatic center”,Astrophys. J.819(2016) 44, doi:10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/44,arXiv:1511.02938

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT observations of dwarf satellite galaxies

    MAGIC Collaboration, “Limits to dark matter annihilation cross-section from a combined analysis of MAGIC and Fermi-LAT observations of dwarf satellite galaxies”, JCAP02(2016) 039,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/02/039, arXiv:1601.06590

    2016 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Dark matter annihilation in the galactic center as seen by the Fermi gamma ray space telescope

    D. Hooper and L. Goodenough, “Dark matter annihilation in the galactic center as seen by the Fermi gamma ray space telescope”,Phys. Lett. B697(2011) 412, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.029,arXiv:1010.2752

    2011 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Origin of the gamma rays from the galactic center

    D. Hooper and T. Linden, “Origin of the gamma rays from the galactic center”,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 123005,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.123005,arXiv:1110.0006

    2011 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Detection of a gamma-ray source in the galactic center consistent with extended emission from dark matter annihilation and concentrated astrophysical emission

    K. N. Abazajian and M. Kaplinghat, “Detection of a gamma-ray source in the galactic center consistent with extended emission from dark matter annihilation and concentrated astrophysical emission”,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 083511, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.083511,arXiv:1207.6047. [Err...

    2012 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Dark matter interpretation of the Fermi-LAT observation toward the galactic center

    C. Karwin et al., “Dark matter interpretation of the Fermi-LAT observation toward the galactic center”,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 103005, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.103005,arXiv:1612.05687

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Extended gamma-ray emission from coy dark matter

    C. Boehm et al., “Extended gamma-ray emission from coy dark matter”,JCAP05 (2014) 009,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/009,arXiv:1401.6458

    2014 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bottom-up approach to the galactic center excess

    E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, and B. Shuve, “Bottom-up approach to the galactic center excess”,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 055002,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.055002, arXiv:1404.2018

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Renormalizable model for the galactic center gamma-ray excess from dark matter annihilation

    S. Ipek, D. McKeen, and A. E. Nelson, “Renormalizable model for the galactic center gamma-ray excess from dark matter annihilation”,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 055021, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.055021,arXiv:1404.3716

    2014 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Simplified dark matter models for the galactic center gamma-ray excess

    A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott, “Simplified dark matter models for the galactic center gamma-ray excess”,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 115022, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.115022,arXiv:1404.0022. 24

    2014 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Dark matter with pseudoscalar-mediated interactions explains the DAMA Signal and the galactic center excess

    C. Arina, E. Del Nobile, and P . Panci, “Dark matter with pseudoscalar-mediated interactions explains the DAMA Signal and the galactic center excess”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 114(2015) 011301,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.011301,arXiv:1406.5542

    2015 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Constraining the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections with XENON1T

    XENON Collaboration, “Constraining the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections with XENON1T”,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 141301, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.141301,arXiv:1902.03234

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplifieds-channel models of dark matter

    A. Boveia et al., “Recommendations on presenting LHC searches for missing transverse energy signals using simplifieds-channel models of dark matter”,Phys. Dark Univ.27 (2020) 100365,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100365,arXiv:1603.04156

    2020

  14. [22]

    Pseudoscalar portal dark matter

    A. Berlin, S. Gori, T. Lin, and L.-T. Wang, “Pseudoscalar portal dark matter”,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 015005,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.015005,arXiv:1502.06000

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for new phenomena in events with an energetic jet and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 112006,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.112006, arXiv:2102.10874

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new particles in events with energetic jets and large missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP11 (2021) 153,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)153,arXiv:2107.13021

    2021 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Search for dark matter in association with an energetic photon in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in association with an energetic photon in pp collisions at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP02(2021) 226, doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)226,arXiv:2011.05259

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Search for new physics in final states with a single photon and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for new physics in final states with a single photon and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP02 (2019) 074,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)074,arXiv:1810.00196

    2019 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Search for associated production of aZboson with an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for associated production of aZboson with an invisibly decaying Higgs boson or dark matter candidates at √s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137066, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137066,arXiv:2111.08372

    2022

  20. [28]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a leptonically decaying Z boson in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a leptonically decaying Z boson in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 13,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08739-5,arXiv:2008.04735. [Erratum: doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08959-3]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a standard model Higgs boson decaying into b-quarks using the full run 2 dataset from the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a standard model Higgs boson decaying into b-quarks using the full run 2 dataset from the ATLAS detector”,JHEP11(2021) 209,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)209, arXiv:2108.13391

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP10(2021) 013, doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)013,arXiv:2104.13240

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a Higgs boson in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP03(2020) 025, doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2020)025,arXiv:1908.01713. References 25

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of bottom quarks in proton–proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying to a pair of bottom quarks in proton–proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 280,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6730-7, arXiv:1811.06562

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying toγγorτ +τ− at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a Higgs boson decaying toγγorτ +τ− at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP09(2018) 046, doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2018)046,arXiv:1806.04771

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into W+W− in the one-lepton final state at √s=13 TeV using 139 fb−1 of pp collisions recorded with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP07(2023) 116, doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2023)116,arXiv:2211.07175

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into W±W∓ or ZZ in fully hadronic final states from√s=13 TeV pp collisions recorded with the ATLAS detector”,Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 121802,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.1218...

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark and an energetic W boson in √s=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark and an energetic W boson in √s=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 603,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11582-z, arXiv:2211.13138

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark in √s=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark in √s=13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 860,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09566-y,arXiv:2011.09308

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a top quark pair at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter particles produced in association with a top quark pair at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 011803, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.011803,arXiv:1807.06522

    2019 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark or a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark or a top quark pair in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JHEP03(2019) 141,doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)141,arXiv:1901.01553

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Measurement of the B 0 S→µ+µ− decay properties and search for the B0→µ+µ− decay in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the B 0 S→µ+µ− decay properties and search for the B0→µ+µ− decay in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,Phys. Lett. B842(2023) 137955,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137955,arXiv:2212.10311

    2023

  33. [41]

    Study of the rare decays ofB 0 s andB 0 mesons into muon pairs using data collected during 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Study of the rare decays ofB 0 s andB 0 mesons into muon pairs using data collected during 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector”,JHEP04(2019) 098,doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)098,arXiv:1812.03017

    2015 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Weak radiative decays of the B meson and bounds on MH± in the two-Higgs-doublet model

    M. Misiak and M. Steinhauser, “Weak radiative decays of the B meson and bounds on MH± in the two-Higgs-doublet model”,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 201, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4776-y,arXiv:1702.04571

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Measurement of the inclusiveB→X s+d γ branching fraction, photon energy spectrum and HQE parameters

    Belle Collaboration, A. Abdesselam et al., “Measurement of the inclusiveB→X s+d γ branching fraction, photon energy spectrum and HQE parameters”, in38th International Conference on High Energy Physics. 8, 2016.arXiv:1608.02344

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    B s,d →ℓ +ℓ− in a two Higgs doublet model

    H. E. Logan and U. Nierste, “B s,d →ℓ +ℓ− in a two Higgs doublet model”,Nucl. Phys. B 586(2000) 39,doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00417-X,arXiv:hep-ph/0004139. 26

    2000 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Updated NNLO QCD predictions for the weak radiative B-meson decays

    M. Misiak et al., “Updated NNLO QCD predictions for the weak radiative B-meson decays”,Phys. Rev. Lett.114(2015) 221801, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.221801,arXiv:1503.01789

    2015 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Measurement of theB 0 s →µ +µ− branching fraction and search for B0 →µ +µ− with the CMS experiment

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of theB 0 s →µ +µ− branching fraction and search for B0 →µ +µ− with the CMS experiment”,Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 101804, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.101804,arXiv:1307.5025

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Dark matter through the axion portal

    Y. Nomura and J. Thaler, “Dark matter through the axion portal”,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 075008,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.075008,arXiv:0810.5397

    2009 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Simplified models for dark matter face their consistent completions

    D. Goncalves, P . A. N. Machado, and J. M. No, “Simplified models for dark matter face their consistent completions”,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 055027, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.055027,arXiv:1611.04593

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Looking through the pseudoscalar portal into dark matter: Novel mono-Higgs and mono-Z signatures at the LHC

    J. M. No, “Looking through the pseudoscalar portal into dark matter: Novel mono-Higgs and mono-Z signatures at the LHC”,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 031701, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.031701,arXiv:1509.01110

    2016 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models

    G. C. Branco et al., “Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models”,Phys. Rept.516(2012) 1,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.02.002,arXiv:1106.0034

    2012 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators

    M. Bauer, U. Haisch, and F. Kahlhoefer, “Simplified dark matter models with two Higgs doublets: I. Pseudoscalar mediators”,JHEP05(2017) 138, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)138,arXiv:1701.07427

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Next-generation spin-0 dark matter models

    LHC Dark Matter Working Group, “Next-generation spin-0 dark matter models”,Phys. Dark Univ.27(2020) 100351,doi:10.1016/j.dark.2019.100351, arXiv:1810.09420

    2020

  45. [53]

    HEPData record for this analysis, 2025.doi:10.17182/hepdata.157541

    2025 doi

  46. [54]

    The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST3(2008) S08004, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004

    2008 doi

  47. [55]

    Performance of the CMS level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS level-1 trigger in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST15(2020) P10017, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/10/P10017,arXiv:2006.10165

    2020 arXiv

  48. [56]

    The CMS trigger system

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS trigger system”,JINST12(2017) P01020, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/01/P01020,arXiv:1609.02366

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations

    J. Alwall et al., “The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations”,JHEP07 (2014) 079,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)079,arXiv:1405.0301

    2014 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Merging meets matching in MC@NLO

    R. Frederix and S. Frixione, “Merging meets matching in MC@NLO”,JHEP12(2012) 061,doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2012)061,arXiv:1209.6215

    2012 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: The POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P . Nason, and C. Oleari, “Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: The POWHEG method”,JHEP11(2007) 070, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/11/070,arXiv:0709.2092

    2007 arXiv

  52. [60]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: The POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P . Nason, C. Oleari, and E. Re, “A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: The POWHEG BOX”,JHEP06(2010) 043,doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2010)043,arXiv:1002.2581. References 27

    2010 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ

    Y. Li and F. Petriello, “Combining QCD and electroweak corrections to dilepton production in FEWZ”,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 094034, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.094034,arXiv:1208.5967

    2012 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders

    M. Czakon and A. Mitov, “Top++: A program for the calculation of the top-pair cross-section at hadron colliders”,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2930, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2014.06.021,arXiv:1112.5675

    2014 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W− or H−

    N. Kidonakis, “Two-loop soft anomalous dimensions for single top quark associated production with a W− or H−”,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 054018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.054018,arXiv:1005.4451

    2010 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Vector boson pair production at the LHC

    J. M. Campbell, R. K. Ellis, and C. Williams, “Vector boson pair production at the LHC”, JHEP07(2011) 018,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)018,arXiv:1105.0020

    2011 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW

    M. Czakon et al., “Top-pair production at the LHC through NNLO QCD and NLO EW”,JHEP10(2017) 186,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)186,arXiv:1705.04105

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, and M. Wiesemann, “Fully differential NNLO computations with MATRIX”,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 537, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5771-7,arXiv:1711.06631

    2018 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Measurement of the inclusive and differential WZ production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inclusive and differential WZ production cross sections, polarization angles, and triple gauge couplings in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2022) 032,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)032, arXiv:2110.11231

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Parton distributions from high-precision collider data

    NNPDF Collaboration, “Parton distributions from high-precision collider data”,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 663,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5199-5, arXiv:1706.00428

    2017 arXiv

  61. [69]

    An introduction to pythia 8.2

    T. Sj ¨ostrand et al., “An introduction to pythia 8.2”,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159,doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024,arXiv:1410.3012

    2015 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Extraction and validation of a new set of CMSPYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements

    CMS Collaboration, “Extraction and validation of a new set of CMSPYTHIA8 tunes from underlying-event measurements”,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 4, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7499-4,arXiv:1903.12179

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    GEANT4–a simulation toolkit

    GEANT4 Collaboration, “GEANT4–a simulation toolkit”,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250,doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8

    2003 doi

  64. [72]

    Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Particle-flow reconstruction and global event description with the CMS detector”,JINST12(2017) P10003,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/10/P10003, arXiv:1706.04965

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Technical proposal for the phase-II upgrade of the CMS detector”, technical report, 2015.doi:10.17181/CERN.VU8I.D59J

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC

    CMS Collaboration, “Electron and photon reconstruction and identification with the CMS experiment at the CERN LHC”,JINST16(2021) P05014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/05/P05014,arXiv:2012.06888

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of the CMS muon detector and muon reconstruction with proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P06015, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/06/P06015,arXiv:1804.04528. 28

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “The anti-kT jet clustering algorithm”,JHEP04 (2008) 063,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2008/04/063,arXiv:0802.1189

    2008 arXiv

  69. [77]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P . Salam, and G. Soyez, “FastJet user manual”,Eur. Phys. J. C72(2012) 1896,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1896-2,arXiv:1111.6097

    2012 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Dispelling theN 3 myth for thek T jet-finder

    M. Cacciari and G. P . Salam, “Dispelling theN 3 myth for thek T jet-finder”,Phys. Lett. B 641(2006) 57,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.08.037, arXiv:hep-ph/0512210

    2006 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Jet energy scale and resolution in the CMS experiment in pp collisions at 8 TeV”,JINST12(2017) P02014, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/12/02/P02014,arXiv:1607.03663

    2017 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data

    CMS Collaboration, “Pileup mitigation at CMS in 13 TeV data”,JINST15(2020) P09018, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/09/P09018,arXiv:2003.00503

    2020 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Identification of heavy-flavour jets with the CMS detector in pp collisions at 13 TeV”,JINST13(2018) P05011, doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/05/P05011,arXiv:1712.07158

    2018 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector

    CMS Collaboration, “Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV using the CMS detector”,JINST14(2019) P07004,doi:10.1088/1748-0221/14/07/P07004,arXiv:1903.06078

    2019 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Review of particle physics

    Particle data group, “Review of particle physics”,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    2024 doi

  76. [84]

    Measuring masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders

    C. G. Lester and D. J. Summers, “Measuring masses of semi-invisibly decaying particles pair produced at hadron colliders”,Phys. Lett. B463(1999) 99, doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00945-4,arXiv:hep-ph/9906349

    1999 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Analytical solution of t t dilepton equations

    L. Sonnenschein, “Analytical solution of t t dilepton equations”,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 054015,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.054015,arXiv:hep-ph/0603011. [Erratum: doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.079902]

    2006 arXiv

  78. [86]

    PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library

    A. Paszke et al., “PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library”, inNIPS’19: 33rd International Conference on Neural Information, p. 721. Curran Associates Inc., 2019.arXiv:1912.01703

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Bisection-based asymmetric M T2 computation: A higher precision calculator than existing symmetric methods

    C. G. Lester and B. Nachman, “Bisection-based asymmetric M T2 computation: A higher precision calculator than existing symmetric methods”,JHEP03(2015) 100, arXiv:1411.4312

    2015 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Random forests

    L. Breiman, “Random forests”,Mach. Learn.45(2001) 5, doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324

    2001 doi

  81. [89]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC run II

    J. Butterworth et al., “PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC run II”,J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/2/023001,arXiv:1510.03865

    2016 arXiv

  82. [90]

    A critical appraisal and evaluation of modern PDFs

    A. Accardi et al., “A critical appraisal and evaluation of modern PDFs”,Eur. Phys. J. C 76(2016) 471,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4285-4,arXiv:1603.08906

    2016 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples

    R. Barlow and C. Beeston, “Fitting using finite Monte Carlo samples”,Comp. Phys. Comm.77(1993) 219,doi:10.1016/0010-4655(93)90005-W. References 29

    1993 doi

  84. [92]

    Measurement of the t t production cross section, the top quark mass, and the strong coupling constant using dilepton events in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the t t production cross section, the top quark mass, and the strong coupling constant using dilepton events in pp collisions at√s=13 TeV”,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 368, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6863-8,arXiv:1812.10505

    2019 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “Measurement of the inelastic proton-proton cross section at√s=13 TeV”,JHEP07(2018) 161,doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2018)161, arXiv:1802.02613

    2018 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS

    CMS Collaboration, “Precision luminosity measurement in proton-proton collisions at√s=13 TeV in 2015 and 2016 at CMS”,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 800, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09538-2,arXiv:2104.01927

    2015 arXiv

  87. [95]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2017 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS-PAS-LUM-17-004, 2018

    2017

  88. [96]

    CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV

    CMS Collaboration, “CMS luminosity measurement for the 2018 data-taking period at√s=13 TeV”, CMS-PAS-LUM-18-002, 2019

    2018

  89. [97]

    The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE

    CMS Collaboration, “The CMS statistical analysis and combination tool: COMBINE”, Comput. Softw. Big Sci.8(2024) 19,doi:10.1007/s41781-024-00121-4, arXiv:2404.06614

    2024 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Presentation of search results: the CL s technique

    A. L. Read, “Presentation of search results: the CL s technique”,J. Phys. G28(2002) 2693,doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313

    2002 doi

  91. [99]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, and O. Vitells, “Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics”,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1554, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0,arXiv:1007.1727. [Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2501]

    2011 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Computing decay rates for new physics theories with FeynRules and MadGraph 5 aMC@NLO

    J. Alwall et al., “Computing decay rates for new physics theories with FeynRules and MadGraph 5 aMC@NLO”,Comput. Phys. Commun.197(2015) 312, doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.031,arXiv:1402.1178

    2015 arXiv

  93. [101]

    MadDM v.1.0: Computation of dark matter relic abundance using MadGraph 5

    M. Backovic, K. Kong, and M. McCaskey, “MadDM v.1.0: Computation of dark matter relic abundance using MadGraph 5”,Phys. Dark Univ.6(2014) 18, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2014.04.001,arXiv:1308.4955

    2014 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters

    Planck Collaboration, “Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters”,Astron. Astrophys.594(2016) A13,doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525830, arXiv:1502.01589

    2015 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation

    G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta, and J. F. Beacom, “Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact on searches for dark matter annihilation”,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 023506, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.023506,arXiv:1204.3622. 30 31 A The CMS Collaboration Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Arm...

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.