Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Benchmarking quantum processors with a single qubit

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.05775 v1 pith:WW6F4C54 submitted 2019-05-14 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumalgorithmdqc1becomebenchmarkcircuitcounterrors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The first generation of small noisy quantum processors have recently become available to non-specialists who are not required to understand specifics of the physical platforms and, in particular, the types and sources of noise. As such, it is useful to benchmark the performance of such computers against specific tasks that may be of interest to users, ideally keeping both the circuit depth and width as free parameters. Here we benchmark the IBM Quantum Experience using the Deterministic Quantum Computing with 1 qubit (DQC1) algorithm originally proposed by Knill and Laflamme in the context of liquid state NMR. In the first set of experiments we use DQC1 as a trace estimation algorithm to produce visibility plots. In the second set we use this trace estimation algorithm to distinguish between knots, a classically difficult task which is known to be complete for DQC1. Our results indicate that the main limiting factor is the length of the circuit, and that both random and systematic errors become an issue when the gate count increases. Surprisingly, we find that at the same gate count wider circuits perform better, probably due to randomization of coherent errors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools