REVIEW 2 cited by
D-branes and Fat Black Holes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The application of D-brane methods to large black holes whose Schwarzschild radius is larger than the compactification scale is problematic. Callan and Maldacena have suggested that despite apparent problems of strong interactions when the number of branes becomes large, the open string degrees of freedom may remain very dilute due to the growth of the horizon area which they claim grows more rapidly than the average number of open strings. Such a picture of a dilute weakly coupled string system conflicts with the picture of a dense string-soup that saturates the bound of one string per planck area. A more careful analysis shows that Callan and Maldacena were not fully consistent in their estimates. In the form that their model was studied it can not be used to extrapolate to large mass without being in conflict with the Hawking Bekenstein entropy formula. A somewhat modified model can reproduce the correct entropy formula. In this ``improved model" the number of string bits on the horizon scales like the entropy in agreement with earlier speculations of Susskind.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Resolved Elliptic Genus and the D1-D5 CFT
The resolved elliptic genus refines the supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 CFT by summing only over symmetry sectors that mix under a deformed supercharge, yielding agreement with supergravity below the black-hole thre...
-
A Central Charge for sub-AdS Holography
Sub-AdS scales are mapped to sub-stacks of M < N D-branes, yielding a scale-dependent central charge c(R0) = (R0/L)^{d+q-1} c(L), with consistency checks from small black holes and Dp-brane theories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.