REVIEW 1 cited by
Triangular Contrastive Learning on Molecular Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent contrastive learning methods have shown to be effective in various tasks, learning generalizable representations invariant to data augmentation thereby leading to state of the art performances. Regarding the multifaceted nature of large unlabeled data used in self-supervised learning while majority of real-word downstream tasks use single format of data, a multimodal framework that can train single modality to learn diverse perspectives from other modalities is an important challenge. In this paper, we propose TriCL (Triangular Contrastive Learning), a universal framework for trimodal contrastive learning. TriCL takes advantage of Triangular Area Loss, a novel intermodal contrastive loss that learns the angular geometry of the embedding space through simultaneously contrasting the area of positive and negative triplets. Systematic observation on embedding space in terms of alignment and uniformity showed that Triangular Area Loss can address the line-collapsing problem by discriminating modalities by angle. Our experimental results also demonstrate the outperformance of TriCL on downstream task of molecular property prediction which implies that the advantages of the embedding space indeed benefits the performance on downstream tasks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Joint Generalized Cosine Similarity: A Novel Method for N-Modal Semantic Alignment Based on Contrastive Learning
The authors define a joint generalized cosine similarity from the Gram determinant and use it in a contrastive loss called GHA to align three or more modalities in one step.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.