Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 39 references

Electronic Structure Theory with Molecular Point Group Symmetries on Quantum Annealers

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Symmetry-adapted quantum annealing of molecules fails at odd ancilla counts r, giving wrong dissociation energies, and works for even r.

desk verdict Genuine, well-executed observation that SAE+XBK fails for H2 and LiH at odd r, but the paper overgeneralizes this into a universal parity rule on evidence that has a hole in the even-r case and two apparent odd-r counterexamples. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00235 v1 pith:X2NLFDYA submitted 2025-02-01 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

Joseph Desroches , Sijia S. Dong This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords quantumannealingelectronicstructuresymmetry-adaptedencodingXia-Bian-KaismethodJordan-WignertransformationpotentialenergysurfacesmultireferencedissociationIsingHamiltonian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum annealers can only minimize Ising-type Hamiltonians, so molecular electronic structure problems must first be rewritten as such. This paper combines the XBK transformation, which encodes a molecular Hamiltonian as an Ising Hamiltonian on r repeated copies of the qubit register, with a symmetry-adapted Jordan-Wigner encoding that exploits molecular point-group symmetries to taper off qubits. The paper's central claim is a parity rule: for odd r, symmetry adaptation removes the higher-order eigenstates that would carry the dissociated ground state of a multireference molecule, so the energy minimum over sign sectors converges to an artificial higher eigenvalue; for even r, the needed states survive and the dissociation limit is correct. If true, this gives a practical guideline for when qubit-saving symmetry encodings can be used on annealers without corrupting potential energy surfaces, and it explains previously puzzling low-r anomalies for small molecules.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pair formed by the XBK transformation and the symmetry-adapted Jordan-Wigner encoding. XBK maps an m-qubit molecular Hamiltonian into a stoquastic Ising Hamiltonian on rm qubits, repeating the basis r times and summing sign sectors p to recover the low-energy physics; the symmetry-adapted JW encoding, built from the Boolean point group $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$ together with particle-number parity, imposes binary constraints that remove k qubits. The argument is carried by the extended eigenspectrum comparison: the paper examines the lowest eigenvalues of the contracted and uncontracted Ising Hamiltonians and identifies the crossing eigenstate whose presence or absence at dissociation decides whether the ground-state minimization finds the correct energy. For odd r that state is in the removed $(1-2^{-kr})2^{mr}$ portion of the spectrum; for even r it survives.

What would settle it

Compute the r=1 symmetry-adapted XBK potential energy curve for a radical-dissociating molecule such as N2 or F2 in the STO-6G basis and compare it with the full configuration interaction dissociation limit. The paper's mechanism predicts a persistent spurious plateau with no ground-state/higher-order crossing in the symmetry-adapted spectrum; if the symmetry-adapted curve instead converges to the FCI dissociation energy, the odd-r rule is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that symmetry-adapted encodings do not commute with the XBK embedding in a harmless way. Although the symmetry-adapted Hamiltonian still has the correct spectrum before transformation, applying XBK to the reduced Hamiltonian produces an expanded Ising spectrum in which, for odd r, the eigenstate that must cross the ground state at dissociation lies among the states that symmetry adaptation has deleted. The minimization over the XBK sign sectors then locks onto the lowest surviving state, which is a higher-order eigenvalue of the uncontracted XBK Hamiltonian, and the potential energy curve converges to a wrong flat energy above the full configuration interaction limit. For even r, and for molecules whose dissociation does not produce open-shell fragments, the critical state remains present and the symmetry-adapted curve matches FCI. The paper establishes this by diagonalizing the XBK Hamiltonians classically for twelve molecules and comparing the full extended spectra of contracted and uncontracted systems.

Load-bearing premise

The even/odd rule is inferred from a small set of molecules, and some of the reference data are incomplete: the FCI curves for BH3 and NH3 are partly linearly interpolated where the classical solver did not converge, and the LiH r=2 sixteen-qubit spectrum failed to converge, so the universality of the parity rule for all multireference systems is not proven.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a molecule with a $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$ symmetry, the combination saves $rk$ qubits relative to plain XBK, an exponential reduction of the Hilbert space that lets larger molecules be treated without an active space.
  • For multireference systems that dissociate into radicals, even $r$ is required: odd $r$ produces a spurious dissociation limit, while even $r$ reproduces the FCI curve.
  • For systems without strong multireference character, such as He2 and symmetric-stretch H2O, symmetry adaptation adds no significant error even at $r=1$, so SAE should be used there.
  • At large $r$ the deleted fraction of the spectrum vanishes, so with enough qubits one can always use symmetry adaptation safely.
  • This mechanism explains the previously reported low-$r$ anomalies seen for H2 and LiH on quantum annealers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's parity rule should extend to other radical-dissociating molecules; the supplementary non-convergence of N2, F2, and Li2 at large bond length is consistent with that extension, though a direct non-symmetry-adapted comparison for those systems is not yet available.
  • A practical diagnostic follows: for a candidate molecule at odd $r$, one can check whether the first excited state of the symmetry-adapted Ising spectrum crosses the ground state near dissociation; absence of the crossing flags the artificial plateau without needing a full FCI reference.
  • On real hardware the qubit savings from symmetry adaptation may be partly offset when even $r$ is mandatory, so the benefit should be measured at fixed accuracy rather than fixed $r$.
  • The same spectral-removal mechanism may apply to other qubit-tapering methods that reduce a Hamiltonian before embedding into an annealer, although the paper does not test that case.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a numerical study that combines symmetry-adapted Jordan-Wigner encodings based on the full Boolean point-group symmetry group Z2^k with the Xia-Bian-Kais (XBK) transformation for quantum-annealer-based electronic structure calculations. The authors implement a classical exact-diagonalization version of XBK, validate it against the Copenhaver et al. code, and compute potential energy surfaces for H2, LiH, He2, H2O, BH3, and NH3 in the main text, with additional molecules in the supplementary material, all compared against FCI references. The central empirical finding is that for low odd values of the XBK ancilla parameter r, the symmetry-adapted XBK ground-state energy converges to an artificial higher-order eigenvalue at dissociation for multireference systems, whereas even r, or systems such as He2 and H2O, do not show this failure. The paper proposes an explanation in terms of the removal of necessary higher-order eigenstates by the symmetry-adapted encoding and recommends using even r for multireference systems.

Significance. If the parity rule holds generally, this is a practically useful design rule for applying symmetry-adapted encodings in XBK calculations and provides a plausible explanation for previously unexplained D-Wave anomalies for H2 and LiH. The paper is strengthened by the public code release, the benchmark of the new XBK implementation against the independent Copenhaver et al. implementation, and the use of exact diagonalization rather than hardware or simulated annealing, which makes the observed energy differences numerical rather than hardware artifacts. The main significance, however, rests on the generality of the even/odd r rule, and the current evidence is suggestive but not yet conclusive.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section III.2, Figs. 5-6] The even-r half of the central rule rests on very limited evidence: for multireference systems, the only even-r demonstrations are H2 at r=2 and LiH at r=2, and the LiH example is incomplete. The LiH r=2 PES has missing points due to 'random issues with memory usage and convergence of the IRLM,' and the LAPACK eigenspectrum for the 16-qubit r=2 Hamiltonian failed to converge. Because the paper's recommendation to use even r for multireference systems depends on the claim that the required higher-order states survive at even r, this missing spectrum is load-bearing. Please complete the LiH r=2 calculation, add at least one additional even-r multireference test, and/or narrow the recommendation to the systems and r values actually verified.
  2. [Sections III.5-III.6, Figs. 11-14] The claimed universal odd-r failure is not consistent with the BH3 and NH3 data. At r=1, the symmetry-adapted ground-state curve for BH3 returns to the FCI curve at large bond lengths (Fig. 11), and for NH3 it drops to meet the FCI curve beyond roughly 3.0 Å (Fig. 13). The paper attributes these recoveries to a large ground-state degeneracy, but this must be reconciled with the Section IV statement that for odd r the relevant states are always among the removed states. Without a criterion distinguishing cases where the required states survive from cases where they are removed, the even/odd rule cannot be stated as a universal rule.
  3. [Sections III.5-III.6, Figs. 11-14] The FCI references for BH3 and NH3 are partly obtained by linear interpolation because PySCF failed to converge at several bond lengths. Since BH3 and NH3 are the two cases that appear to deviate from the odd-r failure pattern, the interpolated baseline could be masking or creating the apparent discrepancy. Please provide converged FCI points using an alternative electronic-structure package or solver settings, or, failing that, explicitly mark the interpolated regions and treat the apparent recovery at large R as uncertain.
  4. [Section IV] The central explanation—'specifically for odd values of r the relevant states required to properly model the electronic structure lie within the removed states'—is presented as a conclusion, but no proof or general argument is given. The symmetry-removal count (1−2^{-kr})2^{mr} depends only on r, not on its parity, so the parity dependence must come from which specific sectors or states are removed, and that mechanism is not analyzed. Please either provide a formal argument based on the structure of the XBK p-sectors and the symmetry-adapted encoding, or recast this statement as an empirical trend with explicitly limited scope.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section II.B, Eq. (6)] The word 'modolo' should be 'modulo.'
  2. [Section II.C] The sentence 'Applying Eq. (11) to every operator in Eq. (7)' is ambiguous because Eq. (7) is the coefficient approximation, not the qubit Hamiltonian; the equation cross-references need to be corrected.
  3. [Figure 5 caption] The caption says the FCI ground-state energy was calculated in the STO-3G basis set, while the text and the plotted results use STO-6G; please correct the caption.
  4. [Section III.3] The text contains the typo 'witho1ut'; it should be 'without.'
  5. [Sections III.5 and III.6] Please state how many FCI points were linearly interpolated for BH3 and NH3 and mark the interpolated points distinctly in the figures, so that the reliability of the comparison is transparent.
  6. [Section IV] The phrase 'internally excited states' is used inconsistently; for clarity, use the 'higher-order eigenspectrum' terminology introduced in Section III throughout the discussion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the even/odd r effect is an empirical spectral finding benchmarked against independent FCI data and prior XBK implementations, not a quantity that reduces to its inputs by construction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained against external references. The symmetry-adapted JW encoding is imported from Picozzi and Tennyson (Ref. 17), the XBK transformation from Xia, Bian, and Kais (Ref. 9), and the authors' own XBK implementation is checked for equivalence against the independent Copenhaver et al. implementation (Ref. 19, and Supplementary Figs. S1-S2). The central claim is that combining SAE with XBK removes the higher-order eigenstates needed to represent the true ground state for odd r, so the SAE ground-state minimization over p sectors converges to an artificial higher-order eigenvalue, while even r preserves the needed states. This claim is supported by direct diagonalization of both SAE and non-SAE Ising Hamiltonians and by comparison with external FCI baselines; it is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no equation in the paper defines the even/odd rule into existence. The energy normalization E_p = E'_p / sum_m b_m^2 is imported from Xia et al. as an external result, not from the authors' own prior work, and the authors have no self-citation chain that forces the conclusion. The explanation that 'for odd values of r the relevant states required to properly model the electronic structure lie within the removed states' is an inference from observed crossings in the higher-order eigenspectra, which is empirical evidence rather than circular reasoning. That said, the manuscript itself flags weaknesses that bear on how well the rule is established, though not on circularity: the only direct even-r multireference demonstration (LiH r=2) has missing PES points and its 16-qubit eigenspectrum failed to converge (Sec. III.2); the FCI baselines for BH3 and NH3 are partly linearly interpolated where PySCF failed to converge (Secs. III.5 and III.6); and NH3 at r=1 drops to the FCI ground state at large bond length, which is not the behavior one would expect if odd r always removed the dissociation-relevant states. These are robustness and completeness concerns, not instances of circularity. The paper does not misuse self-citation, does not import a uniqueness theorem from its own authors, and does not rename a known result as a new derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters or new physical entities. The only tunable quantities are the variational parameter r and the sign-sector index p, both part of the XBK protocol. All underlying constructions (JW/SAE and XBK) are taken from cited work, and comparisons are made against FCI from PySCF and against the Copenhaver et al. implementation. The main epistemic burden is the validity of XBK as an embedding and of the Picozzi-Tennyson tapering, plus the generalization of the odd/even r behavior from a small set of molecules.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption XBK transformation: For each p, the Ising Hamiltonian H'_p has ground state energy E_p and the physical energy is E_p / sum_m b_m^2; the ground state energy of H is min_p of these values (Xia et al., ref 9).
    Used throughout Section II.C and II.D as the basis for extracting ground state energies; accepted from prior work without re-derivation.
  • domain assumption Symmetry-adapted encoding: The Boolean point group Z2^k of the molecular Hamiltonian yields k linear constraints (Eq. 6) that allow k spin-orbitals to be removed while preserving the ground state in the chosen irreducible representation (Picozzi and Tennyson, ref 17).
    Invoked in Section II.B to reduce qubit count; the paper relies on this tapering being exact.
  • domain assumption The molecular systems conserve total spin-up/down number parity and point group symmetries, so the Z2^k generators are valid symmetries of the electronic Hamiltonian.
    Section III lists P_up, P_down, C2y, sigma_v etc. for each molecule; if a symmetry is broken by the basis or the Hamiltonian, the tapering would not be exact.
  • standard math FCI energies computed in the chosen basis sets by PySCF are exact benchmarks for the finite-basis electronic structure problem.
    FCI is used as the reference for all error plots; for BH3 and NH3 the reference is partially linearly interpolated, which weakens this axiom.
  • standard math The Implicitly Restarted Lanczos Method (SciPy) and LAPACK routines return converged ground states for the Ising Hamiltonians.
    The method depends on exact or near-exact diagonalization; the paper notes convergence failures for LiH r=2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electronic Structure Theory with Molecular Point Group Symmetries on Quantum Annealers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2NLFDYA

@misc{pith2026250200235,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electronic Structure Theory with Molecular Point Group Symmetries on Quantum Annealers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2NLFDYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00235}
}
abstract

Quantum computation has the potential to revolutionize quantum chemistry through major speedups to computation times and exponential reduction of computational resources. Here, we combine the symmetry-adapted Jordan-Wigner encoding based on the full Boolean symmetry group $\mathbb{Z}_2^k$ with our new implementation of the Xia-Bian-Kais (XBK) method for improving the efficiency of electronic structure theory calculations on quantum annealers, particularly by reducing the number of qubits needed to achieve the same accuracy. By providing a more extensive symmetry-adapted encoding (SAE) than previous work, we are able to simulate molecules larger than those previously reported that have been studied using methods developed for quantum annealers and without using an active space. We calculated the potential energy surfaces of H$_2$, LiH, He$_2$, H$_2$O, O$_2$, N$_2$, Li$_2$, F$_2$, CO, BH$_3$, NH$_3$, and CH$_4$, with the largest molecule in the STO-6G basis set requiring 16 qubits with our SAE, and compared them with full configuration interaction results. The application of SAE to the XBK method provides an exponential reduction of the size of the Hilbert space and scales well with the size of the problem. It does not introduce significant additional errors for even or large values of a key variational parameter that determines the number of ancilla qubits used in the XBK method's Hamiltonian embedding, or for certain molecules such as He$_2$ and H$_2$O. We provide an explanation for this behavior and a recommendation on the usage of our method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00235 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. An overview of our algorithm. The input of our algorithm includes the molecular geometry, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The ground-state bond dissociation energy curve of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The potential energy surface of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Top row: The first eight higher-order eigenvalues of the non-symmetry-adapted Ising Hamiltonian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The potential energy surface of LiH for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The first eight higher-order eigenvalues for both the non-symmetry-adapted (top) and symmetry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The potential energy surface of He [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The higher-order eigenspectrum for He [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The potential energy surface of H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. The first seven higher-order eigenvalues for the symmetry-adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The potential energy surface of borane (BH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_11.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Similar to H2 and LiH, we see that the ground-state energy of the symmetry-adapted Hamiltonian jumps to meet an incorrect state for these regions. However, unlike H2 and LiH, we see that the symmetry-adapted ground state correctly converges to the FCI ground state in …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The first seven higher-order eigenvalues for the symmetry-adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The potential energy surface of NH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. The first three higher-order eigenvalues for the symmetry-adapted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    + command, where the argument is the citation key mentioned above. +

  5. [5]

    The AIP styles for REV 4 include Bib \ style files +aipnum.bst+ and +aipauth.bst+, appropriate for numbered and author-year bibliographies, respectively

    + commands may be crafted by hand or, preferably, generated by using Bib . The AIP styles for REV 4 include Bib \ style files +aipnum.bst+ and +aipauth.bst+, appropriate for numbered and author-year bibliographies, respectively. REV 4 will automatically choose the style appropriate for the document's selected class options: the default is numerical, and y...

    work page

  6. [6]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  7. [7]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  8. [8]

    author author R. P. \ Feynman ,\ 10.1007/BF02650179 journal journal International Journal of Theoretical Physics \ volume 21 ,\ pages 467 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1007/bf02650179 1982

Show all 39 references
  1. [9]

    McArdle , author S

    author author S. McArdle , author S. Endo , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , author S. C. \ Benjamin , \ and\ author X. Yuan ,\ 10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003 journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 92 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author M. A. \ Nielsen \ and\ author I. L. \ Chuang ,\ 10.1017/CBO9780511976667 title Quantum Computation and Quantum Information : 10th Anniversary Edition , \ howpublished https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/quantum-computation-and-quantum-information/01E1...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Peruzzo , author J

    author author A. Peruzzo , author J. McClean , author P. Shadbolt , author M.-H. \ Yung , author X.-Q. \ Zhou , author P. J. \ Love , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , \ and\ author J. L. \ O'Brien ,\ 10.1038/ncomms5213 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 5 ,\ pages 4213 ( y...

    doi

  4. [12]

    author author K. M. \ Nakanishi , author K. Mitarai , \ and\ author K. Fujii ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033062 journal journal Physical Review Research \ volume 1 ,\ pages 033062 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    author author H. R. \ Grimsley , author S. E. \ Economou , author E. Barnes , \ and\ author N. J. \ Mayhall ,\ 10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 10 ,\ pages 3007 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Aharonov , author W

    author author D. Aharonov , author W. van Dam , author J. Kempe , author Z. Landau , author S. Lloyd , \ and\ author O. Regev ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0405098 title Adiabatic Quantum Computation is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation , \ ( year 2005 ),\ http://arxiv.o...

    doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    author author A. D. \ King , author J. Raymond , author T. Lanting , author R. Harris , author A. Zucca , author F. Altomare , author A. J. \ Berkley , author K. Boothby , author S. Ejtemaee , author C. Enderud , author E. Hoskinson , author S. Huang , author E. Ladizinsky , a...

  8. [16]

    Xia , author T

    author author R. Xia , author T. Bian , \ and\ author S. Kais ,\ 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b10371 journal journal The Journal of Physical Chemistry B \ volume 122 ,\ pages 3384 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    author author S. N. \ Genin , author I. G. \ Ryabinkin , \ and\ author A. F. \ Izmaylov ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.1901.04715 title Quantum chemistry on quantum annealers , \ ( year 2019 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04715 arXiv:1901.04715 [physics, physics:quant-ph] NoStop

    1901 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    Teplukhin , author B

    author author A. Teplukhin , author B. K. \ Kendrick , author S. Tretiak , \ and\ author P. A. \ Dub ,\ 10.1038/s41598-020-77315-4 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 10 ,\ pages 20753 ( year 2020 a ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Teplukhin , author B

    author author A. Teplukhin , author B. K. \ Kendrick , \ and\ author D. Babikov ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00402 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 15 ,\ pages 4555 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    Teplukhin , author B

    author author A. Teplukhin , author B. K. \ Kendrick , author S. M. \ Mniszewski , author Y. Zhang , author A. Kumar , author C. F. A. \ Negre , author P. M. \ Anisimov , author S. Tretiak , \ and\ author P. A. \ Dub ,\ 10.1038/s41598-021-98331-y journal journal Scientific Rep...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Teplukhin , author B

    author author A. Teplukhin , author B. K. \ Kendrick , \ and\ author D. Babikov ,\ 10.1039/D0CP04272B journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 22 ,\ pages 26136 ( year 2020 b ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    Bravyi , author J

    author author S. Bravyi , author J. M. \ Gambetta , author A. Mezzacapo , \ and\ author K. Temme ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.1701.08213 title Tapering off qubits to simulate fermionic Hamiltonians , \ ( year 2017 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08213 arXiv:1701.08213 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2017 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    Setia , author R

    author author K. Setia , author R. Chen , author J. E. \ Rice , author A. Mezzacapo , author M. Pistoia , \ and\ author J. D. \ Whitfield ,\ 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00113 journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 16 ,\ pages 6091 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    Picozzi \ and\ author J

    author author D. Picozzi \ and\ author J. Tennyson ,\ 10.1088/2058-9565/acd86c journal journal Quantum Science and Technology \ volume 8 ,\ pages 035026 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Streif , author F

    author author M. Streif , author F. Neukart , \ and\ author M. Leib ,\ 10.48550/arXiv.1811.05256 title Solving Quantum Chemistry Problems with a D-Wave Quantum Annealer , \ ( year 2019 ),\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05256 arXiv:1811.05256 [quant-ph] NoStop

    2019 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Copenhaver , author A

    author author J. Copenhaver , author A. Wasserman , \ and\ author B. Wehefritz-Kaufmann ,\ 10.1063/5.0030397 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 154 ,\ pages 034105 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    author author J. T. \ Seeley , author M. J. \ Richard , \ and\ author P. J. \ Love ,\ 10.1063/1.4768229 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 137 ,\ pages 224109 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    Tranter , author S

    author author A. Tranter , author S. Sofia , author J. Seeley , author M. Kaicher , author J. McClean , author R. Babbush , author P. V. \ Coveney , author F. Mintert , author F. Wilhelm , \ and\ author P. J. \ Love ,\ 10.1002/qua.24969 journal journal International Journal of...

    doi

  21. [29]

    author author S. B. \ Bravyi \ and\ author A. Y. \ Kitaev ,\ 10.1006/aphy.2002.6254 journal journal Annals of Physics \ volume 298 ,\ pages 210 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002

  22. [30]

    Sun , author T

    author author Q. Sun , author T. C. \ Berkelbach , author N. S. \ Blunt , author G. H. \ Booth , author S. Guo , author Z. Li , author J. Liu , author J. D. \ McClain , author E. R. \ Sayfutyarova , author S. Sharma , author S. Wouters , \ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ 10.100...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author J. R. \ McClean , author N. C. \ Rubin , author K. J. \ Sung , author I. D. \ Kivlichan , author X. Bonet-Monroig , author Y. Cao , author C. Dai , author E. S. \ Fried , author C. Gidney , author B. Gimby , author P. Gokhale , author T. H \"a ner , author T. Har...

  24. [32]

    author author W. J. \ Hehre , author R. F. \ Stewart , \ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ 10.1063/1.1672392 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 51 ,\ pages 2657 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

    1969 doi

  25. [33]

    author author J. S. \ Binkley , author J. A. \ Pople , \ and\ author W. J. \ Hehre ,\ 10.1021/ja00523a008 journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 102 ,\ pages 939 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980 doi

  26. [34]

    Ditchfield , author W

    author author R. Ditchfield , author W. J. \ Hehre , \ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ 10.1063/1.1674902 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 54 ,\ pages 724 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

  27. [35]

    author author T. H. \ Dunning , Jr. ,\ 10.1063/1.456153 journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 90 ,\ pages 1007 ( year 1989 ) NoStop

    1989 doi

  28. [36]

    Using quantum annealers to calculate ground state properties of molecules

    Justin Copenhaver, Adam Wasserman, and Birgit Wehefritz-Kaufmann . Using quantum annealers to calculate ground state properties of molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 154(3):034105, January 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    McClean, Nicholas C

    Jarrod R. McClean, Nicholas C. Rubin, Kevin J. Sung, Ian D. Kivlichan, Xavier Bonet-Monroig , Yudong Cao, Chengyu Dai, E. Schuyler Fried, Craig Gidney, Brendan Gimby, Pranav Gokhale, Thomas H \"a ner, Tarini Hardikar, Vojt e ch Havl \'i c ek, Oscar Higgott, Cupjin Huang, Josh ...

    2020

  30. [38]

    Solving Quantum Chemistry Problems with a D-Wave Quantum Annealer , March 2019

    Michael Streif, Florian Neukart, and Martin Leib. Solving Quantum Chemistry Problems with a D-Wave Quantum Annealer , March 2019

    2019

  31. [39]

    Electronic Structure Calculations and the Ising Hamiltonian

    Rongxin Xia, Teng Bian, and Sabre Kais. Electronic Structure Calculations and the Ising Hamiltonian . The Journal of Physical Chemistry B , 122(13):3384--3395, April 2018

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.