Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 39 references

The paper argues that a two-component dark sector—an axion-like particle and a dark photon, produced by freeze-in through a dimension-five portal—can simultaneously explain the observed dark matter relic density and the Galactic 511 keV lin

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 13:06 UTC pith:X7A625LR

load-bearing objection Workmanlike freeze-in model paper with a genuinely useful Hα constraint, but the 511 keV claim is a parameter fit and the unquantified mass degeneracy carries the scenario. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29131 v1 pith:X7A625LR submitted 2026-07-31 hep-ph

Dark Photon - ALP Freeze-in: 511 keV and Hα Constraints

Simran Arora , Nandini Das , Sukanta Dutta , Ashok Goyal This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords freeze-in dark matteraxion-like particledark photonGalactic 511 keV lineHα constraintskinetic mixingtwo-component dark matterrelic density
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that a minimal two-component dark sector—an axion-like particle (ALP) and a dark photon—can do three things at once: give the observed dark matter abundance through freeze-in (production by rare, feeble interactions that never reach thermal equilibrium), supply the positrons that produce the Galactic 511 keV line, and stay within the Hα emission limits from the dwarf galaxy Leo T. The production is set by a single dimension-five operator connecting the SM hypercharge field to the dark photon, while a tiny kinetic mixing controls the late-time decay. For a nearly degenerate mass pair around 1–10 MeV, with effective scale Λ ~ 10^10–10^12 GeV and kinetic mixing ε ~ 10^-24–10^-23, the relic density ΩDM h^2 ≈ 0.12 is reproduced and the dark photon lives 10^26–10^29 s, long enough to be the 511 keV source. The paper's own analysis flags the near-degeneracy as the load-bearing condition: without it, the dark photon decays radiatively in about 10^8–10^9 s and is excluded by CMB observations.

Core claim

The central claim is that one effective operator, a Bμν \tilde F_D^{μν}/(4Λ), produces both dark-sector particles by freeze-in, while the dark photon's kinetic-mixing decay γ_D → e+e− accounts for the 511 keV line. Solving the coupled Boltzmann equations, the authors find that Z-boson decay dominates production, the two components end with roughly equal relic fractions, and the observed abundance fixes Λ near 10^10–10^12 GeV for MeV-scale masses. The near-degeneracy mγD ≈ ma suppresses the otherwise fatal radiative decay γ_D → aγ, leaving e+e− lifetimes around 10^26–10^29 s. The resulting region also passes the Leo T Hα bound (for a conservative efficiency factor) and all other listed constr

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two couplings. The dimension-five portal operator a Bμν \tilde F_D^{μν}/(4Λ) is the only source of dark-sector production; after electroweak symmetry breaking it generates aγγ_D and aZγ_D vertices, with Z → aγ_D dominating freeze-in. The kinetic mixing ε controls the dark photon's late-time decay to e+e−. Between them sits the near-degeneracy mγD ≈ ma: the phase-space factor (1 − ma^2/mγD^2)^3 suppresses the radiative decay γ_D → aγ, which would otherwise have a lifetime of only ~10^8–10^9 s and violate CMB injection bounds. The coupled Boltzmann equations for the comoving yields track both components from reheating to freeze-out of production.

Load-bearing premise

The scenario stands or falls on the near-degeneracy mγD ≈ ma being imposed by hand; if the mass splitting is not tiny, the dark photon decays radiatively in ~10^8–10^9 s and is excluded by CMB energy-injection bounds, taking both the dark matter population and the 511 keV explanation with it.

What would settle it

Measure the mass splitting between the ALP and dark photon at the sub-MeV level. If (mγD − ma)/mγD is larger than roughly the value that pushes τ(γD → aγ) below ~10^24 s—for MeV masses and Λ ~ 10^12 GeV this is a fractional splitting of order 10^-5 or smaller—the parameter region that explains the 511 keV line is already excluded. A second, independent check: if the Hα efficiency factor f_Hα is determined to be ≳ 0.05, Fig. 5 of the paper shows the 511 keV and Hα allowed regions no longer overlap.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the model is right, the observed dark matter abundance is set by a dimension-five portal scale Λ ~ 10^10–10^12 GeV, with production dominated by Z → aγ_D rather than by scattering.
  • The Galactic 511 keV line would be the decay product of a dark photon that constitutes roughly half of the dark matter, with the ALP making up the other half.
  • The same decay is the dominant source of ionizing electrons in dwarf galaxies, so the 511 keV flux and the Leo T Hα flux are two views of one process; the overlap survives for f_Hα = 0.01 and masses up to about 10 MeV.
  • Collider and fixed-target searches cannot test this region because ε ~ 10^-24–10^-23 lies far below their reach; only cosmological and astrophysical probes discriminate.
  • A small but open parameter window remains in which relic density, 511 keV, and Hα constraints are simultaneously satisfied.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scenario is correct, a future measurement of the 511 keV line morphology and the positron injection rate should match the prediction from a single dark-photon decay mode; any mismatch would point to additional positron sources.
  • The required near-degeneracy is an unexplained tuning; a natural embedding would need a symmetry or mechanism that relates m_a and m_γD, and the size of the allowed splitting is a concrete target for model-building.
  • The same dimension-five portal would also produce a small population of high-energy ALPs and dark photons at earlier times; their impact on BBN or CMB spectral distortions could provide a complementary, testable signature beyond the decays considered here.
  • Because the freeze-in yield scales as (c/Λ)^2, the model predicts a tight relation between the portal scale and the dark-sector mass; measuring either component's abundance independently would test that relation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a freeze-in two-component dark sector consisting of an ALP and a dark photon, coupled to the Standard Model via a dimension-five operator a B_{\mu\nu} \tilde{F}^{\mu\nu}_D and a small kinetic mixing ε. The authors solve the coupled Boltzmann equations to determine the relic abundance, identify the parameter space giving Ω_DM h² ≈ 0.12 with Λ ~ 10¹⁰–10¹² GeV, and then use the dark-photon decay γ_D → e⁺e⁻ through kinetic mixing to address the Galactic 511 keV line. They further confront the model with CMB, diffuse gamma-ray, direct detection, collider, supernova and Leo T Hα constraints. The central claim is that, for a nearly degenerate ALP–dark-photon mass spectrum, there exists a parameter region that simultaneously reproduces the relic density, explains the 511 keV line, and passes all other bounds.

Significance. The model is economical in that a single dimension-five operator controls production of both DM components, and the paper usefully combines the long-lived dark-photon interpretation of the 511 keV line with the recent Leo T Hα bounds in a freeze-in context. The Boltzmann treatment is standard and the constraint compilation is reasonably complete. However, the advertised viable region relies on an unquantified mass degeneracy, and the 511 keV 'explanation' is a fit of ε rather than a predicted flux, so the significance is moderate until these points are addressed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2 / Eq. (3.14)] The near-degeneracy mγD ≃ ma that is essential for the scenario is never quantified. Using Eq. (3.14) at Λ=10¹² GeV, mγD=5 MeV, caγγD=1, the unsuppressed radiative lifetime is ~1.6×10⁹ s. To satisfy the CMB criterion τ≳10²⁴–10²⁵ s quoted in Sec. 4, the phase-space factor must suppress the width by ~10¹⁵, i.e. 1−ma²/mγD²≲10⁻⁵, which for 5 MeV masses means Δm=mγD−ma≲O(10 eV); requiring the radiative width to stay subdominant to γD→e⁺e⁻ pushes the splitting to O(eV). No symmetry or dynamical mechanism is given for such a vector–scalar degeneracy. This is a load-bearing assumption and should be quantified, motivated, or tested against the allowed region.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (3.15), (4.2)] The 511 keV 'explanation' is implemented by choosing ε such that τγD→e⁺e⁻ (Eq. 3.15) equals the empirical lifetime needed for the line (Eq. 4.2). Since ε is a free parameter, this is a consistency fit, not a prediction; no model-derived flux (e.g., with a D-factor, positron propagation and positronium fraction) is computed. The abstract's claim that the model 'explains' the Galactic 511 keV line is therefore overstated. I recommend rephrasing to 'can accommodate' and propagating the uncertainties of Eq. (4.2) into Fig. 5.
  3. [Sec. 5, Eq. (5.1), Fig. 5] The claimed Hα compatibility depends strongly on the efficiency factor fHα, which is assigned values 0.01 and 0.05 without a derivation. The overlap between the 511 keV-favoured and Hα-allowed regions shrinks substantially between the two panels; the paper does not state whether any overlap survives at fHα=0.05 or beyond. Since the abstract asserts consistency with Hα constraints, the authors should provide an estimate of fHα or a sensitivity scan to establish robustness.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (3.12)] The freeze-in evolution is initiated at T_RH = 246 GeV and production above the electroweak scale is ignored, even though the operator a B F_D exists in the unbroken phase. For a non-renormalizable portal the yield typically scales with T_RH, so the relic contours in Fig. 4 are sensitive to this choice. The paper should justify why T>246 GeV contributions are negligible or show the dependence of Λ on T_RH.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title/Abstract] Title has 'ke V' spacing; should be 'keV'. Several places have missing spaces, e.g., 'Hαconstraints'.
  2. [Notation] The portal coupling is denoted c_aγγD in Eq. (2.1e) but c_aγDγ in Eqs. (3.8)–(3.9). Please use a single symbol consistently.
  3. [Eq. (5.1)] The symbol ΓHα is used for an Hα flux, which is confusing because Γ typically denotes a rate. Rename to ΦHα or similar.
  4. [Sec. 5] The Leo T astrophysical factor is quoted as D = 5.01×10¹⁶ GeV cm⁻² from Ref. [51]. Please confirm this is the decay D-factor (not an annihilation J-factor) and specify the line of sight / integration region used.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No self-citation or equation-level circularity; mild consistency-fit flavor in the 511 keV/epsilon and relic/Lambda choices, while independent H-alpha and other bounds carry the central claim.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.2 (Eq. 3.15), Sec. 4 (Eq. 4.2), Sec. 2.2 (Eq. 2.3)]
    "In Sec. 3.2: 'For the benchmark values of ϵ considered in this work, the corresponding lifetime is of order 10^27 s, consistent with the long-lived DM interpretation of the Galactic 511 keV line.' In Sec. 4: 'τDM→e+e− ≃ (MeV/mDM) 10^28 s.'"

    The 511 keV 'explanation' is the inverse of Eq. (3.15): the ε range in Eq. (2.3) is chosen so that Eq. (3.15) meets the required lifetime Eq. (4.2). The orange 511 contour in Fig. 5 is therefore the input requirement translated into (mγD, ε), not an independently predicted observable. Similarly, Fig. 4 selects Λ so that Eq. (3.13) equals ΩDMh²=0.12. This is a transparent parameter-setting consistency fit, and the independent Hα/CMB/gamma-ray overlap is non-circular, so the issue is mild.

full rationale

The paper does not rely on self-citations: the reference list contains no papers by Arora, Das, Dutta, or Goyal, and the Boltzmann equations, cross sections, and decay widths are stated in the paper and are externally checkable. The relic abundance is not claimed as a parameter-free prediction; it is presented as a contour in (mγD+ma, Λ) (Fig. 4), and Λ is scanned to match ΩDMh²=0.12. The 511 keV line is handled by requiring τγD→e+e- ≈ (MeV/mγD) 10^28 s (Eq. 4.2) and choosing the kinetic mixing ε in Eq. (2.3); this is a consistency fit rather than a derivation, but it is explicit and not hidden. The non-trivial content is the overlap of that 511-allowed contour with the independent Leo T Hα bound (Fig. 5), which is a real constraint interplay and can be judged against external benchmarks. The near-degeneracy mγD≈ma (Eq. 2.6) is imposed by hand and the allowed mass splitting is never quantified; this is a genuine fine-tuning/missing-support concern (see Sec. 2.2 and Sec. 4 bullet 3) and should be weighed as model robustness risk, but it is not a circular step because it is an input assumption, not a derived result fed back into itself. Overall: no load-bearing self-citation and no equation-level circularity; the derivation is self-contained, with only mild consistency-fit flavor.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several fitted or hand-chosen inputs: Λ and ϵ are selected to reproduce the relic density and 511 keV lifetime, masses are scanned with an imposed degeneracy, and fHα is a benchmark assumption. No new particle beyond the well-known ALP and dark photon is introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Λ = 10^10–10^12 GeV
    Effective UV scale of the dim-5 portal; chosen (per mass) to reproduce ΩDMh²=0.12 in Fig.4.
  • mγD, ma = ~1–10 MeV, with ma≈mγD
    Dark-sector masses; scanned as inputs, with mass degeneracy imposed by hand to suppress radiative decays.
  • ϵ = ~10^-24–10^-23
    Kinetic mixing; chosen to give dark-photon lifetime τγD→e+e- ~10^26–10^29 s required for the 511 keV flux (Eqs. 3.15, 4.2).
  • caγγD = 1
    Dimensionless portal coupling; set to 1 for convenience; the combination caγγD/Λ is what matters.
  • fHα = 0.01 and 0.05
    Fraction of injected energy emitted as Hα; adopted as 'conservative benchmark values' (Sec.5).
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Freeze-in formalism with negligible initial abundances and neglected back-reaction
    Standard FIMP assumption; used in Eqs. (3.11)-(3.12).
  • domain assumption Production before electroweak symmetry breaking (T>246 GeV) is negligible; evolution starts at TRH=246 GeV
    Stated in Sec.3.2; the dim-5 operator is gauge-invariant and could produce dark sector at higher T, but this contribution is not computed.
  • ad hoc to paper Nearly degenerate masses mγD≈ma with no enforcing symmetry
    Adopted to suppress γD→aγ; Sec.2.2 recognizes this 'requires a mild mass degeneracy' (Sec.4).
  • domain assumption fγD≈fa≈0.5
    Inferred from equal yields and mass degeneracy; used to weight the Hα flux.
  • domain assumption D-factor and f_eq for Leo T
    D=5.01×10^16 GeV/cm² from [51], f_eq≈1; external input.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 13084 in / 17954 out tokens · 174537 ms · 2026-08-03T13:06:21.303138+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate a freeze-in scenario of two component dark matter consisting of an axion-like particle (ALP) and a dark photon. The dark sector connects to the Standard Model through a dimension-five ALP-dark photon interaction, while a small kinetic mixing governs dark photon decays. Solving the coupled Boltzmann equations, we determine the parameter space consistent with the observed relic abundance. We find that, for a nearly degenerate dark sector, dark photon decay into an electron-positron pair through the kinetic mixing explains the Galactic 511 keV line while the dimension five operator can source the necessary production of dark photon and ALP particles to satisfy the relic density. We further confront the model with recent H$\alpha$ observations of dwarf galaxies, together with constraints from the cosmic microwave background, diffuse gamma rays, direct detection and collider searches. We identify viable regions of parameter space yielding $\Omega_{\rm DM}h^2\simeq0.12$, with an effective scale $\Lambda\sim10^{10}$-$10^{12}$ GeV, and dark photon lifetimes of order $10^{26}$-$10^{29}$ s, while remaining consistent with the observed 511 keV photon flux, $H\alpha$ constraints from Leo T and all other astrophysical constraints.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

39 extracted references · 26 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Rubin and W.K

    V.C. Rubin and W.K. Ford, Jr.,Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions, ApJ159(1970) 379

    1970

  2. [2]

    Clowe, M

    D. Clowe, M. Bradac, A.H. Gonzalez, M. Markevitch, S.W. Randall, C. Jones et al.,A direct empirical proof of the existence of dark matter,Astrophys. J. Lett.648(2006) L109 [astro-ph/0608407]. [3]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  3. [4]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  4. [5]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]. – 14 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [6]

    Kolb and M.S

    E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner,The Early Universe, vol. 69, Taylor and Francis (5, 2019), 10.1201/9780429492860. [7]LZ Collaborationcollaboration,Dark matter search results from4.2Tonne−Years of exposure of the lux-zeplin (lz) experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 011802. [8]XENONcollaboration,Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T,P...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [12]

    L.J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S.M. West,Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter,JHEP03(2010) 080 [0911.1120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [13]

    Bernal, M

    N. Bernal, M. Heikinheimo, T. Tenkanen, K. Tuominen and V. Vaskonen,The dawn of fimp dark matter: A review of models and constraints,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A32(2017) 1730023 [1706.07442]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [14]

    Johnson, III, F.R

    W.N. Johnson, III, F.R. Harnden, Jr. and R.C. Haymes,The Spectrum of Low-Energy Gamma Radiation from the Galactic-Center Region., ApJ172(1972) L1

    1972

  9. [15]

    Purcell, L.-X

    W.R. Purcell, L.-X. Cheng, D.D. Dixon, R.L. Kinzer, J.D. Kurfess, M. Leventhal et al.,Osse mapping of galactic 511 kev positron annihilation line emission,The Astrophysical Journal491 (1997) 725

    1997

  10. [16]

    Bouchet, J.P

    L. Bouchet, J.P. Roques and E. Jourdain,On the morphology of the electron–positron annihilation emission as seen by spi/integral*,The Astrophysical Journal720(2010) 1772

    2010

  11. [17]

    Siegert, R.M

    T. Siegert, R.M. Crocker, R. Diehl, M.G.H. Krause, F.H. Panther, M.M.M. Pleintinger et al., Constraints on positron annihilation kinematics in the inner Galaxy,Astron. Astrophys.627 (2019) A126 [1906.00498]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [18]

    Boehm, D

    C. Boehm, D. Hooper, J. Silk, M. Casse and J. Paul,MeV dark matter: Has it been detected?, Phys. Rev. Lett.92(2004) 101301 [astro-ph/0309686]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  13. [19]

    Leane et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Puzzling Excesses in Dark Matter Searches and How to Resolve Them,2203.06859

    R.K. Leane et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Puzzling Excesses in Dark Matter Searches and How to Resolve Them,2203.06859

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  14. [20]

    Siegert,The positron puzzle,2303.15582

    T. Siegert,The positron puzzle,2303.15582

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  15. [21]

    Aghaie, P

    M. Aghaie, P. De la Torre Luque, A. Dondarini, D. Gaggero, G. Marino and P. Panci, (H)ALPing the 511 keV line: A thermal DM interpretation of the 511 keV emission,Phys. Lett. B875(2026) 140331 [2501.10504]

    arXiv 2026

  16. [22]

    Holdom,Two u(1)’s andϵcharge shifts,Physics Letters B166(1986) 196

    B. Holdom,Two u(1)’s andϵcharge shifts,Physics Letters B166(1986) 196

    1986

  17. [23]

    Galison and A

    P. Galison and A. Manohar,TWO Z’s OR NOT TWO Z’s?,Phys. Lett. B136(1984) 279

    1984

  18. [24]

    Leane,Search for Dark Matter Annihilation and Decay with HαLine Emission, 2512.09019

    R.K. Leane,Search for Dark Matter Annihilation and Decay with HαLine Emission, 2512.09019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [25]

    Fayet,Light spin 1/2 or spin 0 dark matter particles,Phys

    P. Fayet,Light spin 1/2 or spin 0 dark matter particles,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 023514 [hep-ph/0403226]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [26]

    Huh, J.E

    J.-H. Huh, J.E. Kim, J.-C. Park and S.C. Park,Galactic 511 keV line from MeV milli-charged dark matter,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 123503 [0711.3528]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [27]

    Chen, Y.-F

    C.-R. Chen, Y.-F. Hsieh and C.S. Nugroho,Impacts of Axion-Like Particle on the Constraints of Dark Photon,PTEP2026(2026) 013C02 [2405.19087]. – 15 –

    arXiv 2026

  22. [28]

    Stueckelberg,Interaction forces in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,Helv

    E.C.G. Stueckelberg,Interaction forces in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,Helv. Phys. Acta11(1938) 299

    1938

  23. [29]

    Feldman, Z

    D. Feldman, Z. Liu and P. Nath,The Stueckelberg Z-prime Extension with Kinetic Mixing and Milli-Charged Dark Matter From the Hidden Sector,Phys. Rev. D75(2007) 115001 [hep-ph/0702123]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [30]

    Essig et al.,Dark Sectors and New, Light, Weakly-Coupled Particles,1311.0029

    R. Essig et al.,Dark Sectors and New, Light, Weakly-Coupled Particles,1311.0029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [31]

    Alexander et al.,Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report,1608.08632

    J. Alexander et al.,Dark Sectors 2016 Workshop: Community Report,1608.08632. [32]NA64collaboration,Dark matter search in missing energy events with NA64,Phys. Rev. Lett. 123(2019) 121801 [1906.00176]. [33]Belle IIcollaboration,Searches for dark-sector particles at Belle II,2311.14647. [34]XENONcollaboration,Light Dark Matter Search with Ionization Signals...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [38]

    Slatyer and C.-L

    T.R. Slatyer and C.-L. Wu,General Constraints on Dark Matter Decay from the Cosmic Microwave Background,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 023010 [1610.06933]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [39]

    Poulin, J

    V. Poulin, J. Lesgourgues and P.D. Serpico,Cosmological constraints on exotic injection of electromagnetic energy,JCAP03(2017) 043 [1610.10051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [40]

    A. Hook, G. Marques-Tavares and C. Ristow,Supernova constraints on an axion-photon-dark photon interaction,JHEP06(2021) 167 [2105.06476]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  29. [41]

    Gondolo and G

    P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,Cosmic abundances of stable particles: Improved analysis,Nucl. Phys. B360(1991) 145

    1991

  30. [42]

    Husdal,On effective degrees of freedom in the early universe,1609.04979

    L. Husdal,On effective degrees of freedom in the early universe,1609.04979

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [43]

    Drees, F

    M. Drees, F. Hajkarim and E.R. Schmitz,The effects of qcd equation of state on the relic density of wimp dark matter,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 18 [1403.6813]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [44]

    Knodlseder,The all-sky distribution of 511 kev electron-positron annihilation emission, Astron

    J.e.a. Knodlseder,The all-sky distribution of 511 kev electron-positron annihilation emission, Astron. Astrophys.441(2005) 513 [astro-ph/0506026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  33. [45]

    Siegert,Gamma-ray spectroscopy of positron annihilation in the milky way,Astron

    T.e.a. Siegert,Gamma-ray spectroscopy of positron annihilation in the milky way,Astron. Astrophys.586(2016) A84 [1512.00325]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  34. [46]

    De la Torre Luque, S

    P. De la Torre Luque, S. Balaji and J. Silk,New 511 keV Line Data Provide Strongest sub-GeV Dark Matter Constraints,Astrophys. J. Lett.973(2024) L6 [2312.04907]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [47]

    Feng and Z.-H

    W.-Z. Feng and Z.-H. Zhang,Darker matter generating from the dark,Phys. Rev. D112 (2025) 035004 [2405.19431]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [48]

    Nguyen, P

    T.T.Q. Nguyen, P. De la Torre Luque, I. John, S. Balaji, P. Carenza and T. Linden, INTEGRAL, eROSITA and Voyager constraints on light bosonic dark matter: ALPs, dark photons, scalars, B-L and Li-Lj vectors,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 103010 [2507.13432]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [49]

    Ryan-Weber, A

    E.V. Ryan-Weber, A. Begum, T. Oosterloo, S. Pal, M.J. Irwin, V. Belokurov et al.,The Local Group dwarf Leo T: HI on the brink of star formation,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.384 (2008) 53 [0711.2979]. – 16 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  38. [50]

    Blum et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Rubin Observatory after LSST, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07220]

    B. Blum et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Rubin Observatory after LSST, inSnowmass 2021, 3, 2022 [2203.07220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [51]

    Evans, J.L

    N.W. Evans, J.L. Sanders and A. Geringer-Sameth,Simple j-factors and d-factors for indirect dark matter detection,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 103512. – 17 –

    2016