Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

This paper establishes that tensionless and degenerate-metric p-brane actions admit symmetries generated by Killing tensors of arbitrary rank, each yielding a conserved Noether charge.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 14:22 UTC pith:XFD44RGF

load-bearing objection A careful benchmarking paper with two interesting new symmetry claims whose derivations currently skip the terms that matter; the p=1 case shows exactly why those terms are needed. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2512.20590 v2 pith:XFD44RGF submitted 2025-12-23 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Brane Symmetries Revisited: Symmetries of Tensile and Tensionless Branes in Possibly Degenerate Metrics and their Manifestations

Leron Borsten , Mateo Galdeano , Hyungrok Kim This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MP PACS 11.25.-w
keywords Killing tensorsW-symmetriestensionless branesdegenerate metricsp-brane actionsNoether chargesgeneralized geodesicsDuff-Lu metric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to show that the worldvolume action of a bosonic p-brane — a particle, string, or membrane moving through spacetime — possesses far more symmetries than was previously appreciated, provided either the brane's tension is taken to zero or the target-space metric is allowed to be degenerate. The symmetries are generated by Killing tensors of arbitrary rank, a natural generalization of the Killing vectors that generate isometries; in the tensionless or degenerate-metric settings, every suitable such tensor defines a transformation that leaves the action invariant, generalizing the chiral W-symmetries of the string to all p and to background (p+1)-form fields. For a charged particle with position-dependent mass (p=0), the conditions organize into an infinite hierarchy of tensors, which in the massive case reduce to the familiar Killing tensor symmetries and in the massless case to conformal Killing tensors. If these claims hold, each such symmetry gives a conserved Noether charge along the brane's motion, so brane trajectories — viewed as generalized geodesics — carry hidden invariants just as ordinary geodesics do, with potential echoes in the corresponding bulk theories.

Core claim

The paper claims that the gauge-fixed p-brane action (39), coupled to a background (p+1)-form and a dilaton, is invariant under transformations of the form δx^μ = ε K^μ_{ν2...νk m2...ml} v^{ν2}...v^{νk} λ^{m2}...λ^{ml}, where v^μ is the worldvolume time derivative of the embedding and λ^m = ε^{i1...ip} ∂_{i1} x^{μ1}...∂_{ip} x^{μp} is the antisymmetric p-brane momentum, provided the tensor K obeys certain algebraic conditions. In the tensionless limit the conditions reduce to: K is a Killing tensor of arbitrary rank and its contraction with the field strength dA vanishes (eq. 67). In the degenerate-metric case, with a nondegenerate worldvolume metric, the conditions are the four equations (6

What carries the argument

Killing tensors — totally symmetric tensors whose symmetrized covariant derivative vanishes, with the degenerate-metric analogue written using first-kind Christoffel symbols — are the objects generating the symmetries. The ansatz (54) contracts such a tensor with powers of the brane velocity v^μ and with the antisymmetric worldvolume momenta λ^m; requiring the action to be stationary under this variation converts the problem of finding symmetries into linear conditions on K, namely (62) in the degenerate case and (67) in the tensionless case. This is what turns an infinite family of ordinary tensor fields into actual symmetries of the worldvolume theory. Noether's theorem then assigns to eac

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the uncomputed pieces of the variation of the action — the terms coming from the background form field acting on the variation of the worldvolume momenta and of the velocity — either vanish or cancel, since the paper derives its conditions (62) and (67) without evaluating them, while also setting aside the first-class constraints that the brane must satisfy.

What would settle it

Compute the full variation of (39) under (54) for p=2 in flat spacetime with a constant background 3-form field strength, including the A·δλ and A·λ·δv terms that never appear in §4.3; the paper's condition (67) would be falsified if a constant symmetric tensor annihilated by the flux still produces a nonvanishing δS. Repeating this check in a degenerate metric against condition (62) would settle whether those conditions are necessary and sufficient.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If correct, every solution of (62) or (67) produces a conserved Noether charge along the brane worldvolume, giving brane trajectories a family of hidden invariants analogous to those of geodesics.
  • The p=1 case reproduces the classical string W-symmetries: tensors covariantly constant with respect to the torsionful connection ∇+ generate holomorphic currents, linking the construction to W-algebras when anomalies are absent.
  • For p=0, the infinite hierarchy (71) furnishes an unbounded set of symmetries of a charged particle with position-dependent mass; in the massless limit these reduce to conformal Killing tensors.
  • The Hamiltonian (53) written in terms of the generalized p-brane metric manifests T- and U-duality for the string and membrane cases without introducing extra coordinates.
  • For invertible metrics with nonzero tension and p≥2 the paper finds no symmetries of this form beyond isometries and time translations, so the interesting cases are exactly the tensionless and degenerate-metric corners.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conditions are complete, the same tensor data should determine integrability of brane sigma models in tensionless or degenerate regimes; a natural test is to search for complete sets of higher-rank Killing tensors in metrics with known geodesic integrability and check whether the corresponding brane charges are independent and in involution.
  • The p=0 hierarchy (71) has the form of a recursion, and the paper does not ask whether it comes from a Lax pair or a bi-Hamiltonian structure; if it does, the infinite set of symmetries would be a sign of classical integrability for that particle system.
  • Quantizing the new charges (95) for p≥2 should produce an algebra extending the string W-algebra; the ordering ambiguities noted in §5.2 give a concrete starting point for computing anomalies in simple flat-space examples.
  • The paper's reading of the tensionless and degenerate cases in relation to the absence of global symmetries suggests a sharper test: check whether the new conserved charges survive coupling to a dynamical bulk theory, or whether they are broken by quantum effects; that would distinguish a genuine symmetry of the worldvolume system from an accidental one of the probe action.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the gauge-fixed bosonic p-brane action (39), with target-space metric g, a (p+1)-form A, and a scalar Φ controlling the tension, and asks under which conditions transformations of the ansatz (54) — built from Killing-type tensors contracted with worldvolume velocities v and λ — are symmetries. It claims that for a degenerate target metric the conditions (62) characterize such symmetries, that in the tensionless limit Φ→0 the conditions (67) hold even for nondegenerate g and give rank-k Killing tensors, and that for p=0 one obtains an infinite hierarchy (71). It also recovers known particle and string cases, including the torsionful ∇± string conditions in §4.5, and discusses Noether charges, W-algebra analogues, and bulk implications.

Significance. If correct, the paper would extend string W-symmetries to all p-branes, to a (p+1)-form background, and to non-invertible target metrics, and would provide conserved charges along generalized geodesics. The paper does contain useful checks: the particle and string benchmarks are reproduced, and the Duff–Lu Hamiltonian identity (53) is explicitly verified. However, the two central new results rest on unproved computations and on a degenerate-metric Killing definition whose k=1 reduction appears inconsistent with the standard Killing-vector equation. The significance of the new claims therefore cannot be assessed without substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (12)] The definition (12) does not reduce to the standard Killing-vector condition for k=1, despite the claim immediately after (12). For k=1, (12) reads ∂_{(μ}(g_{ν)ρ}K^ρ)+Γ_{ρμν}K^ρ=0. In the two-dimensional metric g=dx^2+f(x)dt^2, the vector K=∂_t satisfies L_K g=0 for every f(x), but (12) gives f'(x)=0. The sign of the connection term in (9) appears to be incorrect: the standard expansion is ∂_{(μ}K_{ν)}−Γ^ρ_{μν}K_ρ=0. Since (62) and the degenerate-metric branch of (71) are built directly on (12), these results are not currently supported.
  2. [§4.3.1, Eqs. (65)–(67)] The derivation of the tensionless symmetry conditions (67) is incomplete. The variation is split into δ^{(k+1,0)}S and δ^{(k,1)}S, but the contributions from δλ^m in (41) and from δv^μ under the transformation (64) are never evaluated. In the p=1 string case, these omitted terms are exactly what produce the torsionful connection ∇+ in (88)–(89). The text 'It is then clear by examination' (for (62)) and 'Thus' (before (67)) do not supply the needed computation. Unless a separate argument shows that these contributions cancel for p≥2 or for degenerate g, the conditions (67) and (62) are not established. Please provide the full variation, including boundary terms.
  3. [§4.3, after Eq. (61)] The no-go statement that for invertible g, p≥2, Φ≠0 only isometries and time translations survive is asserted as 'a direct but laborious computation' with no details. This claim frames the paper's novelty and should be proved or accompanied by a reference. Moreover, time translation (58) does not satisfy the first condition of (62) (g_{ν1 μ}K^μ_{ν2}=g_{ν1ν2}≠0) yet is a symmetry via a total-derivative term; this illustrates that a term-by-term vanishing condition is not necessary, and an explicit treatment of boundary terms is required for the claimed classification.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, eq. (48)] The statement that first-class constraints can be ignored 'for the purposes of deriving conserved quantities' needs clarification: symmetries of the unconstrained action may not descend to the constrained surface unless their charges are weakly conserved. Please state the precise on-shell/off-shell status of the charges in (95)–(96).
  2. [§4.3, eq. (60)] The sentence 'A general variation of (46)' should read 'A general variation of the action (39)'; (46) is the equation of motion, not the action.
  3. [General] The typesetting contains many unicode artifacts (e.g. '∝⌈≀⊔⊣⌋⌋' in place of derivatives) and the notation for the multi-index m and the factors of p! in (41)–(43) should be stated more explicitly. These are presentation issues only.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: conditions (62)/(67)/(71) come from self-contained action variations benchmarked against external results ([2],[15],[65],[72]); self-citations [34],[91] are contextual, not load-bearing. The omitted A·δλ / A·δv terms in the §4.3 and §4.3.1 variations are a completeness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The action (39) is varied under the transformation ansatz (54); the tensionless conditions (67) are read off from the split δS = δ^{(k+1,0)}S + δ^{(k,1)}S in (65)–(66), the degenerate-metric conditions (62) 'by examination' of (60), and the p=0 hierarchy (71) by direct integration by parts of (68) under (69). There are no fitted parameters, no engineered normalizations, and no object is defined in terms of the quantity it is claimed to predict. External benchmarks anchor the results: particle Killing tensors ([2], §3), string W-symmetries ([15], §4.5), tensionless-string Killing tensors ([65]); the Duff–Lu Hamiltonian (53) is stated to reproduce [72,(4.26)] and [73]. The only self-citations, [34] (with co-author Galdeano) and [91] (authors Borsten and Kim), are contextual ('recent discussion' of W-algebras; a list of generalized-symmetry references) and carry no load-bearing argument, so they do not constitute circularity. Two manuscript-flagged caveats are weighed and found to be correctness gaps, not circular steps: (i) the variations behind (62) and (67) never display the A·δv^μλ^m and A_{μm}v^μδλ^m contributions — λ^m is defined in (41) and does vary under (54) — while in the paper's own p=1 calculation such terms are essential, combining with ∂A to produce the torsionful connections ∇± in (88)–(89), so for p≥2 the displayed conditions are conditions on a truncated variation; (ii) the no-go 'when g is invertible and p≥2 and Φ≠0, these are the only symmetries of the ansatz (54)' is asserted without proof, the first-class constraints are explicitly dropped 'for the purposes of constructing conserved quantities' (§4.1, §4.3.1), and the §5.3 bulk bijection rests on a sketched dimensional reduction of the external theorem [93]. Because the central claims are computed rather than definitionally imposed, and no conclusion is forced by a self-citation chain, the circularity score is 1.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters: the derivation is symbolic; all background fields (g, A, Φ, γ) are inputs, and no constants are fitted to data. No invented entities: the paper explicitly declines doubled coordinates (§4.2). The central claim rests on: (i) the standard Polyakov-like p-brane action (34)–(35) with a D-brane dilaton normalization (the paper notes other normalizations for other brane types); (ii) the gauge-fixing (36)/(45) combined with dropping the first-class constraints when constructing conserved quantities — flagged in-text; (iii) the restriction of the symmetry analysis to polynomial transformations of the form (54) — the 'only symmetries' no-go claim holds within this ansatz only; (iv) the author-proposed degenerate-metric definition of Killing tensors (§2.1, eq. 12), which is a definition, not a consequence; and (v) external theorems (Eastwood [93], Michel–Somberg–Šilhan [94]) cited for the bulk correspondence, including an asserted (not shown) dimensional-reduction step in §5.3.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The Polyakov-like p-brane action (34)–(35) with the D-brane dilaton normalization exp(−φ) is the correct starting action; the symmetry analysis depends on this normalization (an NS5-brane needs exp(−2φ)).
    Invoked at eqs. (34)–(35); the authors state the normalization 'does not affect the symmetry analysis' but the position-dependent mass Φ and the tensionless-limit Φ→0 are defined through it.
  • domain assumption Worldvolume gauge-fixing (36) (and the conformal gauge (45) for p=1) is legitimate, and the resulting first-class constraints can be dropped 'for the purposes of constructing conserved quantities'.
    Stated in §4.3 and §4.3.1; the claimed Noether charges (95)–(96) are properties of the gauge-fixed unconstrained system, and the paper does not show constraint contributions cancel on the constrained surface.
  • domain assumption Symmetry transformations are restricted to the polynomial ansatz (54): δx^μ = K^{μ}_{ν2...νk m2...ml} v^{ν2}···v^{νk} λ^{m2}···λ^{ml}.
    The no-go claim ('these are the only symmetries of the ansatz') and all new conditions (62), (67), (71) hold within this ansatz; derivative-dependent or non-polynomial transformations are not analyzed (the paper's own p=0 generalization (69) shows the ansatz is a choice, not a theorem).
  • ad hoc to paper Killing tensors in degenerate metrics are defined by eq. (12), using first-kind Christoffel symbols and a (1,k−1) tensor with g_{μ1ν}K^{ν μ2...μk} totally symmetric.
    §2.1: this definition is introduced for this paper (no inverse metric exists); it reduces to the standard definition only when g is invertible, and its representation-dependence is a modeling choice.
  • standard math External theorems on higher symmetries of the Laplacian ([93] Eastwood; [94] Michel–Somberg–Šilhan) hold, and the bulk/particle symmetry bijection follows by dimensional reduction of [93].
    Invoked in §3 and §5.3; the dimensional-reduction step itself is asserted, not shown (red flag 4).

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 28369 in / 26130 out tokens · 253227 ms · 2026-08-03T14:22:34.546505+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyse the symmetries of tensionless and tensile branes moving in a target space with a possibly degenerate metric, with the worldvolume metric remaining nondegenerate. We recover known results about symmetries of strings and branes as well as new results in the tensionless and degenerate-metric cases. We comment on ramifications in the corresponding bulk theories.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Emergent fracton strings from covariant bi-form gauge field theory

    hep-th 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A rank-4 tensor gauge theory yields emergent fracton strings with a new generalised dipole conservation law for closed strings and reduces to linearised area-metric gravity in a suitable limit.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Wald.General Relativity

    Robert M. Wald.General Relativity. Chicago University Press, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America, 1984. doi:10.7208/chicago/ 9780226870373.001.0001

    doi:10.7208/chicago/ 1984

  2. [2]

    On quadratic first integrals of the geodesic equations for type {22} spacetimes.Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics, 18(4):265–274, December 1970.doi:10.1007/BF01649445

    Martin Walker and Roger Penrose. On quadratic first integrals of the geodesic equations for type {22} spacetimes.Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics, 18(4):265–274, December 1970.doi:10.1007/BF01649445

    doi:10.1007/bf01649445 1970

  3. [3]

    Jan-Willem van Holten and Rachel H. Rietdijk. Symmetries and motions in manifolds.Journal of Geometry and Physics, 11(1–4):559–574, June 1993. arXiv:hep-th/9205074,doi:10.1016/0393-0440(93)90079-T

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  4. [4]

    Rietdijk and Jan-Willem van Holten

    Rachel H. Rietdijk and Jan-Willem van Holten. Generalized Killing equations and symmetries of spinning space.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 7(2):247–255, February 1990.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/7/2/017

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/7/2/017 1990

  5. [5]

    Rietdijk, and Jan-Willem van Holten

    Gary William Gibbons, Rachel H. Rietdijk, and Jan-Willem van Holten. SUSY in the sky.Nuclear Physics B, 404(1–2):42–64, August 1993.arXiv: hep-th/9303112,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90472-2

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  6. [6]

    Killing–Yano equa- tions and𝐺 structures.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(10):105016, May 2008.arXiv:0712.0542,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/10/105016

    Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος). Killing–Yano equa- tions and𝐺 structures.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(10):105016, May 2008.arXiv:0712.0542,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/10/105016. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Hidden symmetries and supergravity solutions

    Osvaldo Pablo Santillán. Hidden symmetries and supergravity solutions. JournalofMathematicalPhysics,53(4):043509,April2012. arXiv:1108.0149, doi:10.1063/1.3698087

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  8. [8]

    Killing-Yano equa- tions with torsion, worldline actions and𝐺-structures.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29(11):115008, May 2012

    Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος). Killing-Yano equa- tions with torsion, worldline actions and𝐺-structures.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29(11):115008, May 2012. arXiv:1111.6744, doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/29/11/115008

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields

    Brandon Carter. Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields. Physical Review, 174(5):1559–1571, October 1968.doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 174.1559

    doi:10.1103/physrev 1968

  10. [10]

    Killing tensors and the separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 44(1):9–38, February 1975.doi:10.1007/BF01609055

    Nicholas Michael John Woodhouse. Killing tensors and the separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 44(1):9–38, February 1975.doi:10.1007/BF01609055

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01609055 1975

  11. [11]

    Volume 2: SpinorandTwistorMethodsinSpace-TimeGeometry

    Roger Penrose and Wolfgang Rindler.Spinors and Space-Time. Volume 2: SpinorandTwistorMethodsinSpace-TimeGeometry. CambridgeMonographs onMathematicalPhysics.CambridgeUniversityPress,Cambridge,United Kingdom, April 1988.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511524486

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511524486 1988

  12. [12]

    Higher-dimensional black holes: Hidden symmetries and separa- tion of variables.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(15):154005, July 2008

    Valeri Pavlovich Frolov (Валерий Павлович Фролов) and David Ku- bizňák. Higher-dimensional black holes: Hidden symmetries and separa- tion of variables.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25(15):154005, July 2008. arXiv:0802.0322,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/15/154005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    Black holes, hidden symmetries, and com- plete integrability.Living Reviews in Relativity, 20(1):6, November 2017

    Valeri Pavlovich Frolov (Валерий Павлович Фролов) , Pavel Krtouš, and David Kubižňák. Black holes, hidden symmetries, and com- plete integrability.Living Reviews in Relativity, 20(1):6, November 2017. arXiv:1705.05482,doi:10.1007/s41114-017-0009-9

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  14. [14]

    Uses of Killing-Yano tensors

    Ulf Gustaf Lindström and Özgür Sarıoğlu. Uses of Killing-Yano tensors. Proceedings of Science, 406:149, November 2022.arXiv:2202.07226, doi: 10.22323/1.406.0149

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    GaugingtheZamolodchikov 𝒲-algebra.Phys- ics Letters B, 240(1–2):110–116, April 1990.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90) 90417-5

    ChristopherMichaelHull. GaugingtheZamolodchikov 𝒲-algebra.Phys- ics Letters B, 240(1–2):110–116, April 1990.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90) 90417-5

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90 1990

  16. [16]

    Howe and Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος)

    Paul S. Howe and Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος). A note on holonomy groups and sigma models.Physics Letters B, 263(2):230– 232, July 1991.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90591-D

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90591-d 1991

  17. [17]

    Howe and Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος )

    Paul S. Howe and Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος ). W-symmetries of a class of𝑑=2 , 𝑁=1 supersymmetric sigma mod- els.Physics Letters B, 267(3):362–365, September 1991. doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(91)90946-N

    1991

  18. [18]

    Howe and Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος )

    Paul S. Howe and Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος ). Holonomy groups and𝑊-symmetries.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 151(3):467–479, February 1993. arXiv:hep-th/9202036, doi: 10.1007/BF02097022. 23

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  19. [19]

    𝒢-structure symmetries and anomalies in(1,0) non-linear 𝜎-models.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(01):062, January 2019

    Xenia de la Ossa Osegueda and Marc-Antoine Fiset. 𝒢-structure symmetries and anomalies in(1,0) non-linear 𝜎-models.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(01):062, January 2019. arXiv:1809.01138, doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)062

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Supersymmetry and Kähler manifolds.Physics Letters B, 87(3):203, November 1979.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90964-X

    Bruno Zumino. Supersymmetry and Kähler manifolds.Physics Letters B, 87(3):203, November 1979.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90964-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90964-x 1979

  21. [21]

    Infinite additional symmetries in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory.Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 65:1205–1213, December 1985.doi:10.1007/BF01036128

    Alexander Borisovich Zamolodchikov (Александр Борисович Замолод- чиков). Infinite additional symmetries in two-dimensional conformal quantum field theory.Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 65:1205–1213, December 1985.doi:10.1007/BF01036128

    doi:10.1007/bf01036128 1985

  22. [22]

    Supersymmetric sigma models and the heterotic string.Physics Letters B, 160(6):398–402, October 1985.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90008-5

    Christopher Michael Hull and Edward Witten. Supersymmetric sigma models and the heterotic string.Physics Letters B, 160(6):398–402, October 1985.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90008-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)90008-5 1985

  23. [23]

    Phenomenology and conformal field theory or can string theory predict the weak mixing angle?Nuclear Physics B, 299(3):613–626, April 1988.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90551-2

    Thomas Israel Banks, Lance Jenkins Dixon, Daniel Harry Friedan, and Emil John Martinec. Phenomenology and conformal field theory or can string theory predict the weak mixing angle?Nuclear Physics B, 299(3):613–626, April 1988.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90551-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90551-2 1988

  24. [24]

    Extension of𝑁=2 superconformal algebra and Calabi-Yaucompactification.ModernPhysicsLettersA,4(6):557–568,March 1989.doi:10.1142/S021773238900068X

    Satoru Odake (小竹悟). Extension of𝑁=2 superconformal algebra and Calabi-Yaucompactification.ModernPhysicsLettersA,4(6):557–568,March 1989.doi:10.1142/S021773238900068X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021773238900068x 1989

  25. [25]

    Superconformalalgebrasandstringcompactifica- tiononmanifoldswith SU(𝑛) holonomy.NuclearPhysicsB,315(1):193–221, March 1989.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90454-9

    Tohru Eguchi (江口徹), Hirosi Ooguri (大栗博司), Anne Taormina, and Sung-KilYang(梁成吉). Superconformalalgebrasandstringcompactifica- tiononmanifoldswith SU(𝑛) holonomy.NuclearPhysicsB,315(1):193–221, March 1989.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90454-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90454-9 1989

  26. [26]

    Supersymmetric sigma models with nonvanishing Nijenhuis tensorandtheiroperatorproductexpansion.NuclearPhysicsB,324(2):523– 531, September 1989.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90478-1

    GustavW.Delius,MartinRoček,AlexanderSevrin,andPetervanNieuwen- huizen. Supersymmetric sigma models with nonvanishing Nijenhuis tensorandtheiroperatorproductexpansion.NuclearPhysicsB,324(2):523– 531, September 1989.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90478-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90478-1 1989

  27. [27]

    Su- perstrings and manifolds of exceptional holonomy.Selecta Mathema- tica, 1(2):347–381, June 1995

    Samson Lulievich Shatashvili (samson ˝ata˝vili ) and Cumrun Vafa. Su- perstrings and manifolds of exceptional holonomy.Selecta Mathema- tica, 1(2):347–381, June 1995. arXiv:hep-th/9407025, doi:10.1007/ BF01671569

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  28. [28]

    A note on the extended superconformal algebras associated with manifolds of exceptional holonomy.Physics Letters B, 392(1–2):77–84, January 1997

    José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill. A note on the extended superconformal algebras associated with manifolds of exceptional holonomy.Physics Letters B, 392(1–2):77–84, January 1997. arXiv:hep-th/9609113, doi: 10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01506-7

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  29. [29]

    Howe and Vid Stojević

    Paul S. Howe and Vid Stojević. On the symmetries of special holonomy sigmamodels.JournalofHighEnergyPhysics,2006(12):045,December2006. arXiv:hep-th/0606270,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/12/045

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  30. [30]

    Howe, Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος), and Vid Stojević

    Paul S. Howe, Georgios Papadopoulos (Γεώργιος Παπαδόπουλος), and Vid Stojević. Covariantly constant forms on torsionful geometries from world-sheet and spacetime perspectives.Journal of High En- ergy Physics, 2010(09):100, September 2010. arXiv:1004.2824, doi: 10.1007/JHEP09(2010)100. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  31. [31]

    (0,2) mirror symmetry on homogeneous Hopf surfaces

    Luis Álvarez-Cónsul, Andoni De Arriba de La Hera, and Mario Garcia- Fernandez. (0,2) mirror symmetry on homogeneous Hopf surfaces. International Mathematical Research Notices, 2024(2):1211–1298, January 2024.arXiv:2012.01851,doi:10.1093/imrn/rnad016

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Deformed Shatashvili-Vafa algebra for superstrings on AdS3×ℳ 7.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(05):156, May 2021.arXiv:2101.10327, doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)156

    Marc-Antoine Fiset and Matthias Reinhard Gaberdiel. Deformed Shatashvili-Vafa algebra for superstrings on AdS3×ℳ 7.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2021(05):156, May 2021.arXiv:2101.10327, doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2021)156

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Vertex algebras from the Hull-Strominger system, May 2023

    Luis Álvarez Cónsul, Andoni De Arriba de La Hera, and Mario García- Fernández. Vertex algebras from the Hull-Strominger system, May 2023. arXiv:2305.06836,doi:10.48550/arXiv.2305.06836

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06836 2023

  34. [34]

    𝒮𝒲-algebras and strings with torsion.Journal of High En- ergy Physics, 2025(04):157, April 2025.arXiv:2412.13904, doi:10.1007/ JHEP04(2025)157

    Xenia de la Ossa Osegueda, Mateo Galdeano, and Enrico Mar- chetto. 𝒮𝒲-algebras and strings with torsion.Journal of High En- ergy Physics, 2025(04):157, April 2025.arXiv:2412.13904, doi:10.1007/ JHEP04(2025)157

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Coule, and Charles Hellaby

    George Francis Rayner Ellis, Ariel Sumeruk, David H. Coule, and Charles Hellaby. Change of signature in classical relativity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 9(6):1535–1554, June 1992.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/011

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/6/011 1992

  36. [36]

    Covariant change of signature in classical relativity.General Relativity and Gravitation, 24(10):1047, October 1992

    George Francis Rayner Ellis. Covariant change of signature in classical relativity.General Relativity and Gravitation, 24(10):1047, October 1992. doi:10.1007/BF00756946

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00756946 1992

  37. [37]

    Nonsingu- lar bouncing cosmology from general relativity.Physical Review D, 100(8):083534,October2019

    Frans Richard Klinkhamer and Zi-Liang Wang (汪子梁). Nonsingu- lar bouncing cosmology from general relativity.Physical Review D, 100(8):083534,October2019. arXiv:1904.09961, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 100.083534

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  38. [38]

    Nonsingular bouncing cosmology in general relativity: physical analysis of the spacetime defect.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38(19):195007, October 2021

    Emmanuele Battista. Nonsingular bouncing cosmology in general relativity: physical analysis of the spacetime defect.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 38(19):195007, October 2021. arXiv:2011.09818, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac1900

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    Regularized big bang singularity: Geodesic congruences.Physical Review D, 104(8):084093, October 2021

    Zi-Liang Wang (汪子梁). Regularized big bang singularity: Geodesic congruences.Physical Review D, 104(8):084093, October 2021. arXiv: 2109.04229,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084093

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Cosmologies with turning points.Physics Letters B, 839:137802, April 2023

    Bob Holdom. Cosmologies with turning points.Physics Letters B, 839:137802, April 2023. arXiv:2302.10716, doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2023.137802

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Classical signature change in the black hole topology.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 6(2):211–238, April 1997.arXiv:gr-qc/9907042, doi: 10.1142/S0218271897000133

    CharlesHellaby,ArielSumeruk,andGeorgeFrancisRaynerEllis. Classical signature change in the black hole topology.International Journal of Modern Physics D, 6(2):211–238, April 1997.arXiv:gr-qc/9907042, doi: 10.1142/S0218271897000133

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  42. [42]

    Salvatore Capozziello, Silvia De Bianchi, and Emmanuele Battista. Avoid- ing singularities in Lorentzian-Euclidean black holes: The role of atem- porality.Physical Review D, 109(10):104060, May 2024.arXiv:2404.17267, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.104060. 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    On the first-order formalism in quantum gravity.Journal of Physics A, 15(3):L105–L110, March 1982.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/15/3/005

    Arkady Alexandrovich Tseytlin (Аркадий Александрович Цейтлин) . On the first-order formalism in quantum gravity.Journal of Physics A, 15(3):L105–L110, March 1982.doi:10.1088/0305-4470/15/3/005

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/15/3/005 1982

  44. [44]

    Jacobson and Lee Smolin

    Theodore A. Jacobson and Lee Smolin. Nonperturbative quantum geo- metries.Nuclear Physics B, 299(2):295–345, April 1988. doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(88)90286-6

    1988

  45. [45]

    Horowitz

    Gary T. Horowitz. Topology change in classical and quantum gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 8(4):587–602, April 1991.doi:10.1088/ 0264-9381/8/4/007

    1991

  46. [46]

    Jacobson.(1+1) sector of(3+1) gravity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 13(8):L111–L116, August 1996

    Theodore A. Jacobson.(1+1) sector of(3+1) gravity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 13(8):L111–L116, August 1996. [Erratum: [135]].arXiv: gr-qc/9604003,doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/8/003

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  47. [47]

    Complex degenerate metrics in general relativity: a covariant extension of the Moore–Penrose algorithm

    Arthur Garnier and Emmanuele Battista. Complex degenerate metrics in general relativity: a covariant extension of the Moore–Penrose algorithm. European Physics Journal C, 85(3):284, March 2025.arXiv:2502.10053, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13957-w

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Horváthy

    Christian Duval, Gary William Gibbons, and Péter A. Horváthy. Con- formal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 31(9):092001,May2014. arXiv:1402.5894, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/ 9/092001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  49. [49]

    Nonre- lativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence.Phys- ical Review D, 96(8):086019, October 2017

    Troels Harmark, Jelle Hartong, and Niels Anne Jacob Obers. Nonre- lativistic strings and limits of the AdS/CFT correspondence.Phys- ical Review D, 96(8):086019, October 2017. arXiv:1705.03535, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.086019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  50. [50]

    Carrollian physics at the black hole horizon.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(16):165002, August 2019

    Laura Donnay and Charles Marteau. Carrollian physics at the black hole horizon.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(16):165002, August 2019. arXiv:1903.09654,doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab2fd5

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    A non-lorentzian primer.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 69:1, May 2023.arXiv:2206.12177,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.69

    Eric Arnold Bergshoeff, José Miguel Figueroa-O’Farrill, and Joaquim Gomis. A non-lorentzian primer.SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 69:1, May 2023.arXiv:2206.12177,doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.69

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Review on non-relativistic gravity.Frontiers in Physics, 11:1116888, March 2023

    Jelle Hartong, Niels Anne Jacob Obers, and Gerben Oling. Review on non-relativistic gravity.Frontiers in Physics, 11:1116888, March 2023. arXiv:2212.11309,doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1116888

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Aspects of nonrelativistic strings

    Gerben Oling and Ziqi Yan (燕子骐). Aspects of nonrelativistic strings. Frontiers in Physics, 10:832271, June 2022.arXiv:2202.12698, doi:10. 3389/fphy.2022.832271

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  54. [54]

    Classical null strings.Physical Review D, 16(6):1722–1726, September 1977.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1722

    Alfred Schild. Classical null strings.Physical Review D, 16(6):1722–1726, September 1977.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1722

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.16.1722 1977

  55. [55]

    The classical bosonic string in the zero tension limit.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 3(4):L73–L75, July 1986.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/002

    Anders Karlhede and Ulf Gustaf Lindström. The classical bosonic string in the zero tension limit.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 3(4):L73–L75, July 1986.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/002. 26

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/3/4/002 1986

  56. [56]

    Zheltukhin (Александр А

    Aleksandr A. Zheltukhin (Александр А. Желтухин). A Hamiltonian of null strings: An invariant action of null (super)membranes.Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, 48:375–379, 1988

    1988

  57. [57]

    Zheltukhin (Александр А

    Aleksandr A. Zheltukhin (Александр А. Желтухин). Interaction of null strings and null membranes with antisymmetric tensor fields.Physics LettersB,233(1–2):112–116,December1989. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89) 90625-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89

  58. [58]

    Superstrings with zero ten- sion.Physics Letters B, 228(2):193–199, September 1989

    João Barcelos-Neto and Martí Ruiz-Altaba. Superstrings with zero ten- sion.Physics Letters B, 228(2):193–199, September 1989. doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(89)90658-8

    1989

  59. [59]

    Null spinning strings.Nuclear Physics B, 338(1):143–187, July 1990.doi:10

    Jorge Gamboa, Cupatitzio Ramírez Romero, and Martí Ruiz-Altaba. Null spinning strings.Nuclear Physics B, 338(1):143–187, July 1990.doi:10. 1016/0550-3213(90)90627-P

    1990

  60. [60]

    The Zero tension limit of the spinning string.Physics Letters B, 258:331–334, 1991.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91094-C

    Ulf Gustaf Lindström, Bo Sundborg, and Georgios Theodoridis (Γεώργιος Θεοδωρίδης). The Zero tension limit of the spinning string.Physics Letters B, 258:331–334, 1991.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91094-C

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91094-c 1991

  61. [61]

    The zero tension limit of the superstring.Physics Letters B, 253(3–4):319–323, January 1991.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91726-C

    Ulf Gustaf Lindström, Bo Sundborg, and Georgios Theodoridis (Γεώργιος Θεοδωρίδης). The zero tension limit of the superstring.Physics Letters B, 253(3–4):319–323, January 1991.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91726-C

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)91726-c 1991

  62. [62]

    Classical and quantized tensionless strings

    Jan Isberg, Ulf Gustaf Lindström, Bo Sundborg, and Georgios Theodor- idis (Γεώργιος Θεοδωρίδης). Classical and quantized tensionless strings. Nuclear Physics B, 411(1):122–156, January 1994.arXiv:hep-th/9307108, doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)90056-6

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  63. [63]

    Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra

    Arjun Bagchi. Tensionless Strings and Galilean Conformal Algebra. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2013(05):141, May 2013.arXiv:1303.0291, doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2013)141

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  64. [64]

    Ten- sionless strings from worldsheet symmetries.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(01):158, January 2016

    Arjun Bagchi, Shankhadeep Chakrabortty, and Pulastya Parekh. Ten- sionless strings from worldsheet symmetries.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(01):158, January 2016. arXiv:1507.04361, doi:10.1007/ JHEP01(2016)158

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  65. [65]

    TensionlessstringsandKilling(- Yano)tensors.PhysicsLettersB,829:137088,June2022

    UlfGustafLindströmandÖzgürSarıoğlu. TensionlessstringsandKilling(- Yano)tensors.PhysicsLettersB,829:137088,June2022. arXiv:2202.06542, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137088

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    Super- membranes.Physics Letters B, 180(4):370–374, November 1986

    James Hughes, Jun Liu, and Joseph Gerard Polchinski, Jr. Super- membranes.Physics Letters B, 180(4):370–374, November 1986. doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(86)91204-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(86)91204-9 1986

  67. [67]

    Bergshoeff, Ergin Sezgin, and Paul Kingsley Townsend

    Eric A. Bergshoeff, Ergin Sezgin, and Paul Kingsley Townsend. Su- permembranes and eleven-dimensional supergravity.Physics Letters B, 189(1–2):75–78, April 1987.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91272-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91272-x 1987

  68. [68]

    Super𝑝-branes.Physics Letters B, 198(3):441– 446, December 1987.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90896-3

    Ana Achúcarro Jiménez, Jonathan Mark Evans, Paul Kingsley Townsend, and David Lauri Wiltshire. Super𝑝-branes.Physics Letters B, 198(3):441– 446, December 1987.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90896-3. 27

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)90896-3 1987

  69. [69]

    Bergshoeff, Ergin Sezgin, and Paul Kingsley Townsend

    Eric A. Bergshoeff, Ergin Sezgin, and Paul Kingsley Townsend. Properties of the eleven-dimensional supermembrane theory.Annals of Physics, 185(2):330–368, August 1988.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(88)90050-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(88)90050-4 1988

  70. [70]

    M. J. Duff. Duality Rotations in String Theory.Nucl. Phys. B, 335:610, 1990. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90520-N

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90520-n 1990

  71. [71]

    Duality rotations in membrane theory.Nuclear Physics B, 347(1–2):394–419, December 1990

    Michael James Duff and Jian Xin Lu (卢建新). Duality rotations in membrane theory.Nuclear Physics B, 347(1–2):394–419, December 1990. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90565-U

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90565-u 1990

  72. [72]

    Classical worldvolumes as generalised geodesics,January2021

    Charles Strickland-Constable. Classical worldvolumes as generalised geodesics,January2021. arXiv:2102.00555, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2102. 00555

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.00555

  73. [73]

    SL(5)du- alityfromcanonicalM2-brane.JournalofHighEnergyPhysics,2012(11):001, November 2012.arXiv:1208.1232,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2012)001

    MachikoHatsuda( 初田真知子)andKiyoshiKamimura( 上村潔). SL(5)du- alityfromcanonicalM2-brane.JournalofHighEnergyPhysics,2012(11):001, November 2012.arXiv:1208.1232,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2012)001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  74. [74]

    (Non)- integrability of geodesics in D-brane backgrounds.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(02):061, February 2014.arXiv:1311.1521, doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2014)061

    YuriChervonyi( Юрий Червоный)andOlegLunin( Олег Лунин). (Non)- integrability of geodesics in D-brane backgrounds.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(02):061, February 2014.arXiv:1311.1521, doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2014)061

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  75. [75]

    Killing(-Yano) tensors in string theory.Journal of High Energy Phys- ics, 2015(09):182, September 2015

    Yuri Chervonyi (Юрий Червоный) and Oleg Lunin ( Олег Лунин). Killing(-Yano) tensors in string theory.Journal of High Energy Phys- ics, 2015(09):182, September 2015. arXiv:1505.06154, doi:10.1007/ JHEP09(2015)182

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  76. [76]

    Generalized global symmetries.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015(02):172, February 2015.arXiv:1412.5148,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

    Davide Silvano Achille Gaiotto, Anton Nikolaevich Kapustin (Антон Николаевич Капустин), Nathan Seiberg, and Brian Willett. Generalized global symmetries.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2015(02):172, February 2015.arXiv:1412.5148,doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  77. [77]

    Dumitrescu, Kenneth A

    Clay Córdova, Thomas T. Dumitrescu, Kenneth A. Intriligator, and Shu- Heng Shao (邵書珩). Snowmass white paper: Generalized symmetries in quantum field theory and beyond, May 2022.arXiv:2205.09545, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2205.09545

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.09545 2022

  78. [78]

    Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, June 2023

    Theodore Daniel Brennan and Sungwoo Hong (홍성ᄋ ᅮ). Introduction to generalized global symmetries in QFT and particle physics, June 2023. arXiv:2306.00912,doi:10.48550/arXiv.2306.00912

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.00912 2023

  79. [79]

    An introduction to higher-form symmetries

    Pedro Rogério Sérgi Gomes. An introduction to higher-form symmetries. SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, 74:1–56, September 2023.arXiv:2303.01817, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.74

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  80. [80]

    Bottini, Ludovic Fraser-Taliente, Liam Gladden, DewiSidWilliamGould,ArthurPlatschorre,andHannahTillim

    Lakshya Bhardwaj, Lea E. Bottini, Ludovic Fraser-Taliente, Liam Gladden, DewiSidWilliamGould,ArthurPlatschorre,andHannahTillim. Lectures on generalized symmetries.Physics Reports, 1051:1–87, February 2024. arXiv:2307.07547,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.002. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.