Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 82 references

The BNT neutrino-mass model can explain the observed baryon asymmetry through thermal leptogenesis, at scales as low as 1.7 TeV in the resonant regime.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-04 18:44 UTC pith:XHC2XQJ5

load-bearing objection First leptogenesis treatment of the BNT model with a likely solid hierarchical bound, but the resonant 1.7 TeV claim fails an internal check: the 'sub-dominant' tree-level neutrino mass is ~44% of the total at their own benchmark. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.01890 v1 pith:XHC2XQJ5 submitted 2026-08-03 hep-ph

Thermal Leptogenesis in the BNT Model of Neutrino Mass

P. S. Bhupal Dev , Srubabati Goswami , Debashis Pachhar , Drona Vatsyayan This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords thermal leptogenesisBNT modelneutrino massvector-like fermion tripletscalar quadrupletresonant leptogenesisCasas-Ibarra parameterizationbaryon asymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper asks whether the Babu-Nandi-Tavartkiladze (BNT) model—which generates small neutrino masses from a dimension-7 operator with a scalar quadruplet and vector-like fermion triplets—can also generate the observed matter–antimatter asymmetry. The authors show that thermal leptogenesis from the decays of the heavy triplets succeeds for a hierarchical spectrum once the lightest triplet is above about 3.5×10^7 GeV, well below the 10^9–10^10 GeV range of canonical seesaw leptogenesis. With a quasi-degenerate triplet pair, resonant CP enhancement pushes the viable scale down to 1.7 TeV, close to the theoretical floor and inside the reach of collider searches. A sympathetic reader would care because this restores the original TeV-scale testability of the model while tying neutrino mass to baryogenesis.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the BNT model's vector-like fermion triplets can serve as the source of the baryon asymmetry through thermal leptogenesis, in either of two lepton-number assignments for the scalar quadruplet. In the hierarchical regime the CP asymmetry avoids the Davidson-Ibarra-style bound because the Yukawa couplings are not tied to the small neutrino masses—the suppression comes from the tiny induced vacuum expectation value and loop factors—so the lightest triplet mass needs only be ≳3.5×10^7 GeV (for a mass ratio r=2). In the quasi-degenerate regime, the self-energy CP asymmetry is resonantly enhanced and the requirement becomes M_Σ1 ≥ 1.7 TeV, essent

What carries the argument

The argument rides on a generalized Casas-Ibarra parameterization that reconstructs the two 3×2 Yukawa matrices from low-energy neutrino data using the one-loop dimension-5 mass formula m_ν = Y^T M Y, with the tree-level dimension-7 contribution neglected as subdominant. The CP asymmetries ε_H and ε_Φ arise from interference of tree and one-loop (vertex and self-energy) diagrams, regulated in the resonant case by the decay width; the final asymmetry comes from numerically solving five coupled Boltzmann equations that track the triplet abundance and the asymmetries in leptons, scalars, and triplets, including gauge annihilations, inverse decays, ΔL=2 scatterings, and the λ5-induced Φ→HHH wash

Load-bearing premise

The Yukawa reconstruction that fixes every CP asymmetry keeps only the one-loop dimension-5 neutrino mass and drops the tree-level dimension-7 contribution, assuming the loop dominates in the parameter regions used for both benchmarks.

What would settle it

Recompute the neutrino mass with both tree and loop terms at the resonant benchmark (M_Σ1 = 1.7 TeV, M_Φ = 1 TeV, λ5 = 0.01) and test whether the reconstructed Yukawa matrices of Eq. (23) still produce the observed neutrino masses and mixings; if the tree term contributes significantly, the computed CP asymmetries lose their grounding.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Successful leptogenesis at M_Σ1 ≳ 3.5×10^7 GeV for a hierarchical triplet spectrum, about two orders of magnitude below the canonical Dirac bound.
  • Resonant leptogenesis at M_Σ1 ≥ 1.7 TeV with nearly degenerate triplets, close to the 1.6 TeV absolute lower bound for triplet seesaw leptogenesis.
  • Both lepton-number assignments for the quadruplet work: the hierarchical case favors LNV in the scalar potential, the resonant case favors LNV in the Yukawa sector.
  • The CP asymmetry is maximized when the two Yukawa matrices are comparable, Y_Φ ≃ Y_H, and the reconstructed couplings show a strong hierarchy |Y_i1| ≪ |Y_i2| that suppresses inverse-decay washout.
  • The derived sphaleron conversion factor including scalar asymmetries, c_sph = 0.461, is the correct factor for baryon-asymmetry reprocessing in this model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the loop-only Yukawa reconstruction survives inclusion of the tree-level dimension-7 term, the same generalized Casas-Ibarra machinery should transfer to other higher-dimensional-operator neutrino models; the leptogenesis scale there could be even lower, since they avoid Higgs-related constraints present in the BNT model.
  • The resonant benchmark's proximity to the theoretical floor (1.7 vs. 1.6 TeV) suggests that this scenario is testable: multi-charged fermion and scalar production at the LHC, same-sign dilepton signatures from Φ±±, and lepton-flavor-violation limits all probe the relevant parameter space.
  • Flavor effects were not included; by analogy with related triplet leptogenesis studies, including them should lower the hierarchical bound by an order of magnitude while barely moving the resonant bound—so the TeV result is likely the robust one.
  • The model's CP-asymmetry structure, with two competing decay channels and ε_Φ = −ε_H in the massless-scalar limit, is a template for leptogenesis in other vector-like matter setups.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies thermal leptogenesis in the Babu-Nandi-Tavartkiladze (BNT) model, which contains a scalar quadruplet Φ and two vector-like fermion triplets Σ. Neutrino masses arise both from a tree-level dimension-7 operator and from a one-loop dimension-5 operator. The authors adopt a generalized Casas-Ibarra (GCI) parametrization that, neglecting the tree-level contribution, reconstructs the two Yukawa matrices from low-energy neutrino data. They then compute CP asymmetries in hierarchical and quasi-degenerate (resonant) regimes, solve a set of coupled Boltzmann equations, and perform numerical scans. The main results are a hierarchical lower bound MΣ1 ≳ 3.5×10^7 GeV (for r = MΣ2/MΣ1 = 2, Eq. (51)) and a resonant lower bound MΣ1 ≥ 1.7 TeV (Sec. VI), the latter presented as restoring the original TeV-scale motivation of the BNT model.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this would be the first detailed leptogenesis study in the BNT model and would significantly extend leptogenesis studies beyond canonical seesaw frameworks. The paper has notable strengths: it carefully constructs the Boltzmann equations with gauge annihilation, decay/inverse-decay, scalar λ5 interactions, RIS-subtracted ∆L=2 scatterings, and a model-specific sphaleron conversion factor; it provides two concrete benchmark points with full Yukawa matrices; and it makes falsifiable predictions for the allowed TeV-scale parameter space. The hierarchical result (MΣ1 ~ 3.5×10^7 GeV) is comparatively robust because in that region the one-loop contribution is clearly dominant. However, the resonant TeV-scale claim rests on a Yukawa reconstruction whose key approximation fails at the quoted benchmark, and the central CP-asymmetry formulas are asserted without derivation. These issues make the resonant lower bound currently unestablished rather than merely imprecise.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III, Eqs. (16)-(20); Sec. VI, Table III (BP2)] The GCI reconstruction of Eq. (20) neglects the tree-level dimension-7 contribution, justified by the statement that it is 'sub-dominant (cf. Fig. 2)'. For BP2 (MΣ1=1.7 TeV, MΦ=1 TeV, MH=125 GeV), evaluating Eqs. (16)-(18) gives m_loop/m_tree ≈ 1.3, so the tree-level term is ~44% of the total neutrino mass, not negligible. Consequently the Yukawa matrices in Eq. (56), obtained from the loop-only GCI inversion, do not reproduce the observed neutrino masses when both contributions are present. Since the CP asymmetries in Eq. (55) and the resulting MΣ1≥1.7 TeV bound are computed from these reconstructed Yukawas, the resonant TeV-scale claim is not currently established. The authors should either include the tree-level contribution in the neutrino-mass formula used for the parametrization, or choose a resonant benchmark in the clearly loop-dominated region (e.g. larger MΦ) and verify it agai
  2. [Sec. IV.A, Eq. (30); Sec. VI, Eq. (55)] The central CP-asymmetry formulas are stated without derivation. Eq. (30) is introduced as 'An explicit calculation leads to the following result', but no calculation, appendix, or reference to a model-specific derivation is provided. The same applies to the resonant formula in Eq. (55) and the width-regulated loop function in Eq. (54). Because the final baryon asymmetry is directly proportional to these quantities, the paper should either include a derivation (at least for the interference terms and the resonant width-regulator) or cite an explicit source. Without this, the quantitative bounds cannot be independently checked.
  3. [Sec. VI, Eqs. (36)-(40)] The Boltzmann equations are written for a single decaying species Σ1. In the quasi-degenerate resonant regime, both Σ1 and Σ2 are nearly mass-degenerate and should both be tracked; their mutual decays, inverse decays, and washout processes differ from the hierarchical case. The paper does not state how Eqs. (36)-(40) are generalized to two nearly degenerate states, nor whether a density-matrix or fully flavor-covariant treatment is used. The efficiency η used to obtain BP2 (Fig. 7, right) is therefore not fully defined by the equations shown. Please clarify the two-species generalization or present the modified Boltzmann equations used for the resonant scan.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. III (text and footnotes)] Several editorial notes meant for co-authors remain in the published text: 'Would be nice to have both tree and loop Feynman diagrams for neutrino mass Done', 'Can we write it simply as ...?Done', 'Why is this 4×4 matrix and not 7×7?', and the footnote 'Remove the frac otherwise it might be confused as 1/0?'. These should be removed.
  2. [Sec. III, Figs. 1 and 2] There are duplicated figure captions and inconsistent figure numbering: two 'FIG. 1' captions appear in Sec. III, and the caption for Fig. 2 also appears twice. Please renumber and merge the figures.
  3. [Eq. (20) and surrounding text] The definition of Y is inconsistent: the text gives Y = (Y_Φ, Y*_H) in one place and Y = (Y_Φ^T, Y_H†)^T in another. Please unify the notation, and also state explicitly the dimensions (4×3) of Y.
  4. [Fig. 2] The y-axis label 'm_loop/m_tree' should specify that these are absolute values of the contributions. It would also be helpful to mark the benchmark points BP1 and BP2 on the plot, since the validity of the loop-only approximation is central to the GCI reconstruction.
  5. [Eq. (27)] The statement that the factor of 3 in Y∆B = 3 c_sph Y∆L 'comes from the three components of Σ' is not self-evident and should be justified or referenced; the sphaleron conversion factor c_sph is already derived per-component in Appendix B, so the origin of the 3 should be explicit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the observed baryon asymmetry is used as a constraint, not predicted; the CP asymmetries and Boltzmann evolution are computed from Lagrangian-level inputs, and no derivation step reduces to its own output by construction.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained. Neutrino masses are computed from the Lagrangian via the tree-level and loop-level formulas in Eqs. (16)-(17), and the Generalized Casas-Ibarra parametrization in Eq. (23) is a rewriting of the loop-dominated relation m_nu = Y^T M Y, not of the baryon asymmetry. The CP asymmetries in Eqs. (30) and (55) are computed from Yukawa contractions and loop functions, and the final asymmetry is obtained by solving the Boltzmann equations (36)-(40). The observed BAU enters explicitly as a selection criterion: "We select those points that lead to Y0_DeltaL = (1.92 +/- 0.04) x 10^-10." Thus agreement with the observed BAU is imposed as a constraint on the scanned parameters, not derived as an independent prediction; the quoted lower bounds M_Sigma1 >= 3.5 x 10^7 GeV and M_Sigma1 >= 1.7 TeV are boundaries of the selected viable region, not forced identities. Several self-citations appear (e.g., Ref. [78] for the GCI parametrization, Ref. [46] for loop dominance, Ref. [80] for an analogous triplet bound), but they are supported either by formulas and figures reproduced in this paper (Fig. 2) or by standard, externally checkable results; no citation chain is used to forbid alternatives. The in-text annotation "Why is this 4 x 4 matrix and not 7 x 7?" is a presentational gap that is answered in the text. The main scientific caveat is a correctness risk, not circularity: at the resonant benchmark BP2 (M_Sigma1 = 1.7 TeV, M_Phi = 1 TeV, lambda_5 = 0.01), the neglected tree-level dimension-7 contribution may not be subdominant, so the loop-only GCI may not reconstruct the Yukawa couplings correctly. That is an assumption-validity concern, not a reduction of the prediction to the input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new particles are introduced: the scalar quadruplet and vector-like fermion triplets are pre-existing BNT model content. The central scan uses five free parameters (M_Sigma1, r, M_Phi, lambda_5, theta_ij), plus the derived Yukawa matrices, to locate parameter space reproducing the observed baryon asymmetry. The GCI parametrization from an overlapping-author reference is a tool, not a fitted prediction.

free parameters (5)
  • lambda_5 (scalar quartic) = BP1: 1e-5; BP2: 0.01; scanned [1e-7, 1]
    Controls the induced quadruplet VEV and the one-loop neutrino mass; chosen per benchmark to satisfy neutrino masses and baryogenesis.
  • M_Sigma1 (lightest triplet mass) = BP1: 3.5e7 GeV; BP2: 1.7e3 GeV; scanned [1e3, 1e15] GeV
    Central scale of leptogenesis; the paper's lower bounds are obtained by scanning this mass.
  • r = M_Sigma2/M_Sigma1 = BP1: 2; BP2: approximately 1; scanned [2,10] for hierarchical case
    Sets the mass hierarchy (washout) or quasi-degeneracy (resonant CP enhancement).
  • M_Phi (scalar quadruplet mass) = BP1: 1000 GeV; BP2: 1000 GeV; scanned [1e3, 1e6] GeV
    Mass of the quadruplet; affects loop suppression, v_Phi, and scalar-sector washout.
  • theta_ij (six complex GCI angles) = BP: theta23 = theta24 = 0; theta12 = -0.003-0.005i, theta13 = 0.001, theta14 = 0.241-0.179i, theta34 = -1.56+0.018i; sca
    Free angles in the generalized Casas-Ibarra parametrization that determine the Yukawa matrices; benchmarks tune some angles to enhance the CP asymmetry.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The one-loop dimension-5 contribution is the sole source of active neutrino masses in the scan; the tree-level dimension-7 contribution is neglected.
    Sec. III, before Eq. (20): "we have neglected the tree-level contribution to neutrino masses as they are sub-dominant (cf. Fig. 2)". The GCI parametrization depends on this approximation.
  • domain assumption Mass hierarchy M_Sigma > M_Phi >> M_H is assumed, so only decays Sigma -> L Phi and Sigma -> Lbar H are relevant and only Sigma1 matters in the hierarchical case.
    Sec. II.B and Sec. IV assume this hierarchy throughout.
  • domain assumption The generalized Casas-Ibarra parametrization of Ref. [78] correctly reconstructs the 4x3 Yukawa coupling matrix from neutrino oscillation data.
    Eq. (23) uses Y = V-dagger D_M^{-1/2} R D_nu^{1/2} U-dagger; the paper relies on this recent parametrization without deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper The CP-asymmetry loop functions fs and fv and their resonant width-regulated form describe the vector-like triplet decays.
    Eqs. (30)-(32) are introduced as "an explicit calculation leads to" with no derivation shown, and Eq. (54) imports a width regularization from Ref. [86].
  • domain assumption Standard Friedmann cosmology, equilibrium thermodynamics, and the given sphaleron chemical-potential calculation convert the lepton asymmetry to the baryon asymmetry.
    Sec. IV.B and Appendix B derive the sphaleron conversion factor 0.461 under stated chemical equilibrium and conservation laws.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 24301 in / 17003 out tokens · 168114 ms · 2026-08-04T18:44:47.708774+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thermal Leptogenesis in the BNT Model of Neutrino Mass." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XHC2XQJ5

@misc{pith2026260801890,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thermal Leptogenesis in the BNT Model of Neutrino Mass},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XHC2XQJ5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01890}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We investigate neutrino mass and thermal leptogenesis in the Babu-Nandi-Tavartkiladze (BNT) model featuring a scalar quadruplet ($\Phi$) and a pair of vector-like fermion triplets ($\Sigma$). In this framework, neutrino masses are generated via an effective dimension-7 operator $LLHH(H^{\dagger}H)/\Lambda^3$ at the tree level and via the dimension-5 operator $LLHH/\Lambda$ at the one-loop level. It naturally accommodates sub-eV neutrino masses even if the new physics scale $\Lambda$ is $\mathcal{O}(\rm TeV)$, thus making the model a compelling target for experimental searches. We explore the viability of thermal leptogenesis in this model, which is distinct from the canonical seesaw-based leptogenesis due to the presence of vector-like fermions. We find that leptogenesis is viable for $M_\Sigma \gtrsim 10^{7}$ GeV for a hierarchical spectrum of fermion triplets. However, in the quasi-degenerate regime, resonant enhancement of the $CP$ asymmetry lowers this scale down to $\mathcal{O}({\rm TeV})$, reconciling successful leptogenesis with the originally motivated TeV-scale phenomenology and testability of the model at colliders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01890 by Debashis Pachhar, Drona Vatsyayan, P. S. Bhupal Dev, Srubabati Goswami.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagrams for the tree and the one-loop FIG1Fdifthtd lti [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the loop (dimension-5) and tree the parameter space. In Fig. 2, we compare the loop and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Tree and one-loop diagrams for the decays of eloop diagrams for the decays of Σ to LΦ and LH¯ that produ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Thermalization rates for gauge, Yukawa and scalar interactions relevant for the Boltzmann equations for two benchmark [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The region in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Evolution of abundances and asymmetries in the hierarchical (left) and quasi-degenerate regime (right) for our two BP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 61 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    H = P ↵ ⇥ ⌃ ! ¯LH ¯⌃ ! L ¯H ⇤ 2 ⌃ ,

    The ⌘ parameter incorporates the effects of washouts, and must be determined via the solution of the Boltz- mann equations, with ⌘ =1 implying maximal efficiency (negligible washouts). The equilibrium yield Y eq ⌃ = neq ⌃ /s is the total number of triplets ( n⌃ +n¯⌃) per unit entropy, and g⇤ = 114 .75 is the total number of relativistic de- grees of freed...

    2020

  2. [2]

    Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,Phys. Rev. Lett.43(1979) 1566

    1979

  3. [3]

    Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys

    P. Minkowski,µ→eγat a Rate of One Out of10 9 Muon Decays?,Phys. Lett. B67(1977) 421

    1977

  4. [4]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 44(1980) 912

    1980

  5. [5]

    Yanagida,Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,Prog

    T. Yanagida,Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos,Prog. Theor. Phys.64(1980) 1103

    1980

  6. [6]

    Gell-Mann, P

    M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky,Complex Spinors and Unified Theories,Conf. Proc. C790927 (1979) 315 [1306.4669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1979

  7. [7]

    Konetschny and W

    W. Konetschny and W. Kummer,Nonconservation of Total Lepton Number with Scalar Bosons,Phys. Lett. B 70(1977) 433

    1977

  8. [8]

    Magg and C

    M. Magg and C. Wetterich,Neutrino Mass Problem and Gauge Hierarchy,Phys. Lett. B94(1980) 61

    1980

  9. [9]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Masses in SU(2) x U(1) Theories,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2227

    1980

  10. [10]

    Cheng and L.-F

    T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li,Neutrino Masses, Mixings and Oscillations in SU(2) x U(1) Models of Electroweak Interactions,Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 2860

    1980

  11. [11]

    Lazarides, Q

    G. Lazarides, Q. Shafi and C. Wetterich,Proton Lifetime and Fermion Masses in an SO(10) Model, Nucl. Phys. B181(1981) 287

    1981

  12. [12]

    Mohapatra and G

    R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic,Neutrino Masses and Mixings in Gauge Models with Spontaneous Parity Violation,Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 165

    1981

  13. [13]

    R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi,Seesaw Neutrino Masses Induced by a Triplet of Leptons,Z. Phys. C44(1989) 441

    1989

  14. [14]

    ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,NATO Sci

    G. ’t Hooft,Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking,NATO Sci. Ser. B59(1980) 135

    1980

  15. [15]

    Kersten and A.Y

    J. Kersten and A.Y. Smirnov,Right-Handed Neutrinos at CERN LHC and the Mechanism of Neutrino Mass Generation,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 073005 [0705.3221]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    Ibarra, E

    A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S.T. Petcov,TeV Scale See-Saw Mechanisms of Neutrino Mass Generation, the Majorana Nature of the Heavy Singlet Neutrinos and (ββ) 0ν -Decay,JHEP09(2010) 108 [1007.2378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  17. [17]

    Mohapatra and J.W.F

    R.N. Mohapatra and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models, Phys. Rev. D34(1986) 1642

    1986

  18. [18]

    Akhmedov, M

    E.K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka and J.W.F. Valle,Left-right symmetry breaking in NJL approach,Phys. Lett. B368(1996) 270 [hep-ph/9507275]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  19. [19]

    Akhmedov, M

    E.K. Akhmedov, M. Lindner, E. Schnapka and J.W.F. Valle,Dynamical left-right symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 2752 [hep-ph/9509255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  20. [20]

    Malinsky, J.C

    M. Malinsky, J.C. Romao and J.W.F. Valle,Novel supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 161801 [hep-ph/0506296]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  21. [21]

    Zee,Quantum Numbers of Majorana Neutrino Masses,Nucl

    A. Zee,Quantum Numbers of Majorana Neutrino Masses,Nucl. Phys. B264(1986) 99

    1986

  22. [22]

    Babu,Model of ’Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses,Phys

    K.S. Babu,Model of ’Calculable’ Majorana Neutrino Masses,Phys. Lett. B203(1988) 132

    1988

  23. [23]

    Pilaftsis,Radiatively induced neutrino masses and large Higgs neutrino couplings in the standard model with Majorana fields,Z

    A. Pilaftsis,Radiatively induced neutrino masses and large Higgs neutrino couplings in the standard model with Majorana fields,Z. Phys. C55(1992) 275 [hep-ph/9901206]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  24. [24]

    Tao,Radiative seesaw mechanism at weak scale, Phys

    Z.-j. Tao,Radiative seesaw mechanism at weak scale, Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 5693 [hep-ph/9603309]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  25. [25]

    Krauss, S

    L.M. Krauss, S. Nasri and M. Trodden,A Model for neutrino masses and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 085002 [hep-ph/0210389]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  26. [26]

    Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys

    E. Ma,Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  27. [27]

    Dev and A

    P.S.B. Dev and A. Pilaftsis,Minimal Radiative Neutrino Mass Mechanism for Inverse Seesaw Models, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 113001 [1209.4051]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [28]

    Y. Cai, J. Herrero-Garc ´ ıa, M.A. Schmidt, A. Vicente and R.R. Volkas,From the trees to the forest: a review of radiative neutrino mass models,Front. in Phys.5 (2017) 63 [1706.08524]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Klein, M

    C. Klein, M. Lindner and S. Ohmer,Minimal Radiative Neutrino Masses,JHEP03(2019) 018 [1901.03225]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Babu, P.S.B

    K.S. Babu, P.S.B. Dev, S. Jana and A. Thapa, Non-Standard Interactions in Radiative Neutrino Mass Models,JHEP03(2020) 006 [1907.09498]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Deppisch, P.S.B

    F.F. Deppisch, P.S.B. Dev and A. Pilaftsis,Neutrinos and Collider Physics,New J. Phys.17(2015) 075019 [1502.06541]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Y. Cai, T. Han, T. Li and R. Ruiz,Lepton Number Violation: Seesaw Models and Their Collider Tests, Front. in Phys.6(2018) 40 [1711.02180]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Babu and C.N

    K.S. Babu and C.N. Leung,Classification of effective 15 neutrino mass operators,Nucl. Phys. B619(2001) 667 [hep-ph/0106054]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  34. [34]

    de Gouvea and J

    A. de Gouvea and J. Jenkins,A Survey of Lepton Number Violation Via Effective Operators,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 013008 [0708.1344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    K.S. Babu, S. Nandi and Z. Tavartkiladze,New Mechanism for Neutrino Mass Generation and Triply Charged Higgs Bosons at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D80 (2009) 071702 [0905.2710]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    Bonnet, D

    F. Bonnet, D. Hernandez, T. Ota and W. Winter, Neutrino masses from higher than d=5 effective operators,JHEP10(2009) 076 [0907.3143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  37. [37]

    Picek and B

    I. Picek and B. Radovcic,Novel TeV-scale seesaw mechanism with Dirac mediators,Phys. Lett. B687 (2010) 338 [0911.1374]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  38. [38]

    Liao,Cascade Seesaw for Tiny Neutrino Mass, JHEP06(2011) 098 [1011.3633]

    Y. Liao,Cascade Seesaw for Tiny Neutrino Mass, JHEP06(2011) 098 [1011.3633]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  39. [39]

    Kumericki, I

    K. Kumericki, I. Picek and B. Radovcic,Exotic Seesaw-Motivated Heavy Leptons at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 093002 [1106.1069]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    Kumericki, I

    K. Kumericki, I. Picek and B. Radovcic,TeV-scale Seesaw with Quintuplet Fermions,Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 013006 [1204.6599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  41. [41]

    McDonald,Minimal Tree-Level Seesaws with a Heavy Intermediate Fermion,JHEP07(2013) 020 [1303.4573]

    K.L. McDonald,Minimal Tree-Level Seesaws with a Heavy Intermediate Fermion,JHEP07(2013) 020 [1303.4573]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  42. [42]

    Wang and Z.-L

    W. Wang and Z.-L. Han,Naturally Small Dirac Neutrino Mass with IntermediateSU(2) L Multiplet Fields,JHEP04(2017) 166 [1611.03240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  43. [43]

    Cepedello, M

    R. Cepedello, M. Hirsch and J.C. Helo,Loop neutrino masses fromd= 7operator,JHEP07(2017) 079 [1705.01489]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Anamiati, O

    G. Anamiati, O. Castillo-Felisola, R.M. Fonseca, J.C. Helo and M. Hirsch,High-dimensional neutrino masses,JHEP12(2018) 066 [1806.07264]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    Dorˇ sner and S

    I. Dorˇ sner and S. Saad,Towards MinimalSU(5),Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 015009 [1910.09008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Giarnetti, J

    A. Giarnetti, J. Herrero-Garcia, S. Marciano, D. Meloni and D. Vatsyayan,Neutrino masses from new Weinberg-like operators: phenomenology of TeV scalar multiplets,JHEP05(2024) 055 [2312.13356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Bambhaniya, J

    G. Bambhaniya, J. Chakrabortty, S. Goswami and P. Konar,Generation of neutrino mass from new physics at TeV scale and multilepton signatures at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 075006 [1305.2795]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  48. [48]

    Ghosh, S

    K. Ghosh, S. Jana and S. Nandi,Neutrino Mass Generation at TeV Scale and New Physics Signatures from Charged Higgs at the LHC for Photon Initiated Processes,JHEP03(2018) 180 [1705.01121]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Ghosh, S

    T. Ghosh, S. Jana and S. Nandi,Neutrino mass from Higgs quadruplet and multicharged Higgs searches at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 115037 [1802.09251]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Pan, J.-H

    J. Pan, J.-H. Chen, X.-G. He, G. Li and J.-Y. Su,Triply charged Higgs bosons at a 100 TeVppcollider,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 43 [1909.07254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Chakraborty, S

    A. Chakraborty, S. Chowdhury, N. Kumar and V. Sahdev,Search for quadruplet scalars using boosted decision trees at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 095017 [2512.19631]

    arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Arbel´ aez, R

    C. Arbel´ aez, R. Cepedello, R.M. Fonseca and M. Hirsch, (g−2)anomalies and neutrino mass,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 075005 [2007.11007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Ashanujjaman and S.P

    S. Ashanujjaman and S.P. Maharathy,Vacuum structure of the Babu-Nandi-Tavartkiladze model of neutrino mass generation,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 075040 [2512.02128]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Fukugita and T

    M. Fukugita and T. Yanagida,Baryogenesis Without Grand Unification,Phys. Lett. B174(1986) 45

    1986

  55. [55]

    Kuzmin, V.A

    V.A. Kuzmin, V.A. Rubakov and M.E. Shaposhnikov, On the Anomalous Electroweak Baryon Number Nonconservation in the Early Universe,Phys. Lett. B 155(1985) 36

    1985

  56. [56]

    K. Dick, M. Lindner, M. Ratz and D. Wright, Leptogenesis with Dirac neutrinos,Phys. Rev. Lett.84 (2000) 4039 [hep-ph/9907562]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  57. [57]

    Murayama and A

    H. Murayama and A. Pierce,Realistic Dirac leptogenesis,Phys. Rev. Lett.89(2002) 271601 [hep-ph/0206177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  58. [58]

    Davidson and A

    S. Davidson and A. Ibarra,A Lower bound on the right-handed neutrino mass from leptogenesis,Phys. Lett. B535(2002) 25 [hep-ph/0202239]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  59. [59]

    Buchmuller, P

    W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari and M. Plumacher,A Bound on neutrino masses from baryogenesis,Phys. Lett. B 547(2002) 128 [hep-ph/0209301]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  60. [60]

    Buchmuller, P

    W. Buchmuller, P. Di Bari and M. Plumacher, Leptogenesis for pedestrians,Annals Phys.315(2005) 305 [hep-ph/0401240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  61. [61]

    Hambye,Leptogenesis: beyond the minimal type I seesaw scenario,New J

    T. Hambye,Leptogenesis: beyond the minimal type I seesaw scenario,New J. Phys.14(2012) 125014 [1212.2888]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  62. [62]

    Moffat, S

    K. Moffat, S. Pascoli, S.T. Petcov, H. Schulz and J. Turner,Three-flavored nonresonant leptogenesis at intermediate scales,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 015036 [1804.05066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Akhmedov, V.A

    E.K. Akhmedov, V.A. Rubakov and A.Y. Smirnov, Baryogenesis via neutrino oscillations,Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(1998) 1359 [hep-ph/9803255]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  64. [64]

    Pilaftsis and T.E.J

    A. Pilaftsis and T.E.J. Underwood,Resonant leptogenesis,Nucl. Phys. B692(2004) 303 [hep-ph/0309342]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  65. [65]

    Chun et al.,Probing Leptogenesis,Int

    E.J. Chun et al.,Probing Leptogenesis,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018) 1842005 [1711.02865]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Hambye, Y

    T. Hambye, Y. Lin, A. Notari, M. Papucci and A. Strumia,Constraints on neutrino masses from leptogenesis models,Nucl. Phys. B695(2004) 169 [hep-ph/0312203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  67. [67]

    Ma and U

    E. Ma and U. Sarkar,Neutrino masses and leptogenesis with heavy Higgs triplets,Phys. Rev. Lett.80(1998) 5716 [hep-ph/9802445]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  68. [68]

    Hambye and G

    T. Hambye and G. Senjanovic,Consequences of triplet seesaw for leptogenesis,Phys. Lett. B582(2004) 73 [hep-ph/0307237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  69. [69]

    Hambye, M

    T. Hambye, M. Raidal and A. Strumia,Efficiency and maximal CP-asymmetry of scalar triplet leptogenesis, Phys. Lett. B632(2006) 667 [hep-ph/0510008]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  70. [70]

    Strumia,Sommerfeld corrections to type-II and III leptogenesis,Nucl

    A. Strumia,Sommerfeld corrections to type-II and III leptogenesis,Nucl. Phys. B809(2009) 308 [0806.1630]. [70]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001. [71]CMScollaboration,A search for doubly-charged Higgs boson production in three and four lepton final states at√s= 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. (2017). [72]ATLAScolla...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  71. [77]

    Giarnetti, J

    A. Giarnetti, J. Herrero-Garc ´ ıa, S. Marciano, D. Meloni and D. Vatsyayan,Neutrino masses from new seesaw models: low-scale variants and phenomenological implications,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 803 [2312.14119]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  72. [78]

    Herrero-Garc ´ ıa, S

    J. Herrero-Garc ´ ıa, S. Marciano, J. Racker and D. Vatsyayan,Generalized Casas-Ibarra parametrization for Majorana neutrino masses,Phys. Rev. D113 (2026) 035035 [2510.18962]

    arXiv 2026

  73. [79]

    Casas and A

    J.A. Casas and A. Ibarra,Oscillating neutrinos and µ→e, γ,Nucl. Phys. B618(2001) 171 [hep-ph/0103065]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  74. [80]

    Vatsyayan and S

    D. Vatsyayan and S. Goswami,Lowering the scale of fermion triplet leptogenesis with two Higgs doublets, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 035014 [2208.12011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  75. [81]

    Kolb and S

    E.W. Kolb and S. Wolfram,Baryon Number Generation in the Early Universe,Nucl. Phys. B172(1980) 224

    1980

  76. [82]

    Berbig,S.M.A.S.H.E.D.: Standard Model Axion Seesaw Higgs inflation Extended for Dirac neutrinos, JCAP11(2022) 042 [2207.08142]

    M. Berbig,S.M.A.S.H.E.D.: Standard Model Axion Seesaw Higgs inflation Extended for Dirac neutrinos, JCAP11(2022) 042 [2207.08142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [83]

    Cirelli, A

    M. Cirelli, A. Strumia and M. Tamburini,Cosmology and Astrophysics of Minimal Dark Matter,Nucl. Phys. B787(2007) 152 [0706.4071]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  78. [84]

    Racker,Low-scale leptogenesis in the scotogenic model: Spectator processes and benchmark points,Phys

    J. Racker,Low-scale leptogenesis in the scotogenic model: Spectator processes and benchmark points,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) L081301 [2411.15120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  79. [85]

    P.S.B. Dev, M. Garny, J. Klaric, P. Millington and D. Teresi,Resonant enhancement in leptogenesis,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A33(2018) 1842003 [1711.02863]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  80. [86]

    P.S.B. Dev, P. Millington, A. Pilaftsis and D. Teresi, Flavour Covariant Transport Equations: an Application to Resonant Leptogenesis,Nucl. Phys. B886(2014) 569 [1404.1003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.