Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 30 references

Perfect and controllable nesting in the small angle twist bilayer graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Small-angle twisted bilayer graphene under interlayer bias has a Fermi surface made entirely of nested, bias-tunable Fermi lines.

desk verdict New prediction of a fully nested Fermi surface in biased twisted bilayer graphene, but the 'perfect' claim needs a quantitative nesting metric before it can be taken at face value. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08318 v1 pith:XLM4RQSL submitted 2019-08-22 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Maximilian Fleischmann , Reena Gupta , Florian Wullschläger , Dominik Weckbecker , Velimir Meded , Sangeeta Sharma , Bernd Meyer , Sam Shallcross This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords twistbilayergrapheneFermisurfacenestingmoirésuperlatticeinterlayerbiaslineslatticerelaxationdislocationnetworkvalleyregion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that tiny-angle twisted bilayer graphene, at twist angles around 0.5 degrees and under an applied interlayer bias, enters a phase whose Fermi surface is composed entirely of straight, parallel 'Fermi lines': three lines from the K valley are exact translations of three lines from the K' valley. That would make it the first 2D material with complete, 100 percent Fermi-surface nesting, as opposed to the partial nesting found in chromium or transition-metal dichalcogenides. The authors show the phase persists in both the ideal twisted geometry and the dislocation network that forms after atomic relaxation, and that the magnitude and direction of the nesting vector can be tuned by the bias. If correct, this turns Fermi-surface nesting from a fixed material property into an externally adjustable knob, and it connects the recently observed topological helical states in this system to a simple underlying Fermiology.

What carries the argument

The central object is the valley-region Fermi surface itself: after an interlayer bias displaces the four Dirac cones, the interlayer coupling reshapes them into six intersecting, slightly distorted cones, three per valley; a constant-energy cut gives rectilinear Fermi lines, and the bias-driven displacement of the cones fixes the nesting vector. The mechanism that produces the lines is hybridization pressure: as the interlayer interaction is switched on, back-folded Dirac arcs that are nearly degenerate hybridize and are pushed out of the energy window, leaving weakly hybridized arcs that straighten into the lines. Computationally, the argument is carried by a continuum Hamiltonian obtained by an exact map from a two-center tight-binding model with Gaussian hopping (intralayer amplitude $-21$ eV, interlayer $0.4$ eV, decay constant $1~\mathrm{\AA}^{-2}$), expressed in layer space with single-layer tight-binding blocks and a non-Abelian interlayer coupling that contains both the twist moiré field and the displacement field of the dislocation network; the equations are solved in a basis of single-layer eigenstates.

What would settle it

A direct measurement or an independent calculation would settle it: at a twist angle near 0.5 degrees and an interlayer bias of roughly 0.3 V, angle-resolved photoemission or a parameter-free ab initio band-structure calculation should show three straight, parallel Fermi lines per valley that are exact translations of the other valley's lines; curved or non-congruent lines, or a nesting vector that does not move with bias, would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Under an applied interlayer bias, the low-energy Fermi surface of small-angle twist bilayer graphene reorganizes into a network of six intersecting, nearly straight Fermi lines: three belonging to the K valley and three to the K' valley, with each set an exact translation of the other. A single nesting vector therefore maps the entire Fermi surface onto itself, which the authors argue is the ultimate limit of Fermi-surface nesting and the first complete example in two dimensions. The nesting vector is not a fixed material property: changing the bias changes the displacement of the four Dirac cones and sweeps both the magnitude and direction of the vector through a wide range. The phase occupies a large region of angle-field space, correlates with the valley region of the density of states, and survives lattice relaxation in both the ideal moiré and reconstructed dislocation-network geometries, although relaxation adds waviness and opens small gaps at line intersections without destroying the perfect nesting. Each Fermi line's wavefunction is dominated by a single, broadened single-layer-graphene state, and the three lines localize on the three partial dislocations of the reconstructed bilayer, reproducing the localization pattern seen in scanning tunneling microscopy.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the Gaussian two-center tight-binding model with the chosen intralayer and interlayer hopping ranges faithfully represents the low-energy electronic structure of real twist bilayer graphene near 0.5 degrees; if the true interlayer hopping has a significantly different momentum dependence, the near-perfect straightness of the Fermi lines could degrade.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At twist angles below about 1 degree and moderate interlayer bias, the entire Fermi surface can be described by a small set of nesting vectors connecting K lines to K' lines, making nesting complete rather than partial.
  • Because the nesting vector's magnitude and direction respond to the applied bias, Fermi-surface nesting becomes an externally tunable experimental parameter.
  • The nested phase is robust to atomic relaxation, appearing in both the ideal twisted geometry and the reconstructed dislocation network, so structural reconstruction does not destroy it.
  • The Fermi-line network underlies the topological helical states observed by STM: the localization of each line on a partial dislocation explains the measured real-space pattern.
  • The nested phase coexists with the strong-coupling magic-angle physics at the Dirac point, showing that the same hybridization-pressure mechanism produces both flat bands and nested weak-coupling lines.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A fully nested Fermi surface with a tunable nesting vector should drive bias-controllable density-wave instabilities; a natural next test is measuring the charge-density-wave or spin-density-wave vector as a function of gate voltage at twist angles near 0.5 degrees.
  • The one-dimensional localization of each Fermi line on a partial dislocation suggests that transport through the dislocation network may be dominated by these channels, with conductance changing as the bias moves the nesting vector.
  • The same bias-driven nesting mechanism may appear in other moiré bilayers, such as transition-metal dichalcogenide twist stacks, wherever Dirac-like cones coexist with a tunable interlayer potential.
  • The simplified robustness check varies Fermi velocity and coupling strength but leaves the momentum dependence of interlayer hopping untested; checking whether realistic ab initio hoppings preserve perfect straightness would sharpen the prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the electronic structure of small-angle twisted bilayer graphene (TBLG) under an interlayer bias, using a continuum Hamiltonian derived from a two-center tight-binding model with Gaussian hopping, combined with atomistic structural relaxation (force-field) and a model relaxation field. The central claim is the existence of a phase, in the regime θ ≈ 0.1°–1° and bias of order 100 meV/Å, in which the Fermi surface consists of three 'Fermi lines' from the K valley that can be translated onto three lines from the K' valley, yielding complete (100%) nesting. The authors present a phase diagram based on a straightness metric, show that the nesting vector is tunable by bias, analyze the real-space and spectral composition of the nesting states, and compare the local density of states with STM images from a minimally twisted bilayer.

Significance. If the central claim is quantitatively established, this would be an interesting and unusual result: a 2D material whose entire Fermi surface is nested, with a bias-tunable nesting vector, offering a controllable platform for nesting-driven instabilities. The paper has notable strengths: the continuum approach is nonperturbative in the stacking order and is backed by convergence tests (Fig. 14, SI E); the inclusion of atomic relaxation with both full structural optimization and a model field is careful; the robustness of the nesting to overall coupling strength and Fermi velocity is tested in a simplified model (Fig. 19); and the LDOS comparison with experiment is a useful sanity check. However, as detailed below, the headline claims of 'perfect' and 'complete' nesting are not yet supported by the evidence presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II.C, Fig. 2a] The phase diagram is constructed from the variance of the velocity-direction distribution N(Θk), which quantifies the straightness of individual Fermi-line segments, not the congruence of the K and K' line sets under a translation. Two sets of straight lines with different orientations would yield a high variance and yet not be nestable. The paper therefore does not establish that the bright regions of the phase diagram are actually nested. I recommend computing a quantitative nesting error: for each K-line segment, find the displacement vector that minimizes its distance to the K' set and report the residual (e.g., averaged point-to-set distance or an overlap integral). Without such a metric, the words 'perfect' and 'complete' are not justified.
  2. [Sec. II.B, Fig. 2e'] The demonstration that the blue K' line 'perfectly coincides' with the red K line after manual shifting is a visual overlay, not a measurement. The text acknowledges 'waviness' and hybridization at nodes at larger angles, but asserts that nesting is 'fully preserve[d]' without quantifying the residual mismatch. Please quantify the nesting error as a function of twist angle and electric field for both the ideal and relaxed structures.
  3. [Sec. IV.B, SI H] The robustness test of Fig. 19 varies the overall interlayer coupling λ and Fermi velocity v_F in a simplified Dirac model, but does not vary the range or momentum dependence of the interlayer hopping. Since the nested-line topology arises from how interlayer hybridization reshapes the six Dirac cones, the result could depend sensitively on the decay length B and the functional form of the interlayer hopping t(δ)=Ae^{-Bδ^2}. I ask the authors to test the nesting against a variation of B (or of an alternative hopping parametrization) within the same continuum framework, or to give a physical argument why the Gaussian form with B=1 Å^{-2} is reliable in the tiny-angle limit.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract, Sec. III] The abstract states 'TBLG possess a phase' — 'possess' should be 'possesses'; also 'intrinstic' in the Discussion is a typo.
  2. [Sec. II.B] The statement that the system 'requires only 3 translation vectors to achieve 100% nesting' should be reconciled with the notion of a 'nesting vector' elsewhere; clarify whether each of the three K lines is translated by a different vector, and give the vectors explicitly for a representative case.
  3. [Sec. II.B, Fig. 1] The claim of 'excellent agreement' with the STM experiment (Huang et al., ref. 21) is stronger than what is shown: the experimental angle is 0.245° while the calculations are at 0.51°, and the comparison is feature-level. Please temper the wording or provide a quantitative comparison.
  4. [Sec. II.C] The definition of N(Θk) and the variance are not fully specified in the main text; include the binning procedure and the energy window used for the phase diagram, or refer to a precise SI section.
  5. [Sec. IV.C, Sec. V] The code and data are only 'available upon request'; for a paper whose central claim is a numerical prediction, a public repository would strengthen reproducibility.
  6. [SI H] The simplified model used in Fig. 19 is not defined in the SI; give the model Hamiltonian and the definitions of λ and v_F.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the nested Fermi-line topology is a computed output of a parameterized tight-binding/continuum model and is not imposed by any fitted parameter or by self-citation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) a two-center tight-binding Hamiltonian with Gaussian hopping parameters A and B, (ii) an exact map to a continuum Hamiltonian, (iii) diagonalization in single-layer graphene eigenstates, and (iv) Fermi surfaces and nesting vectors computed from the resulting band dispersions. The nesting vector is extracted from the computed Fermi-surface geometry, not inserted as an input. The only fitted parameters are standard graphene hopping parameters and a relaxation-field amplitude A fitted to the total energy, not to the nesting claim. The continuum map is cited to the authors' prior work, but that prior work is a general nonperturbative mapping result and does not assume the target nesting topology, so the self-citation is not load-bearing in a circular sense. The paper's 'degree of straightening' metric measures straightness rather than quantitative K-to-K' congruence, and the 'perfect' claim is supported mainly by visual overlay; this is an evidentiary limitation, not circularity, because it does not consist of defining the prediction in terms of an input. Therefore the circularity burden is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the accuracy of the tight-binding/continuum model and the force-field relaxation, but the nesting itself is not fitted. The free parameters are standard graphene/bilayer parameters and structural model parameters. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Intralayer hopping amplitude A = -21 eV
    Set to reproduce the graphene nearest-neighbor hopping of -2.8 eV (Methods IV.B). Not fitted to nesting.
  • Interlayer hopping amplitude A = 0.4 eV
    Chosen to give an AB-stacked bilayer band gap of 0.76 eV (Methods IV.B). Not fitted to nesting.
  • Gaussian hopping decay B = 1 eV Å^-2
    Defines the range of the two-center hopping in the tight-binding model (Methods IV.B).
  • Model relaxation field amplitude A(theta) = linear in theta for 0.2 to 1.2 degrees (Fig. 13b)
    Obtained by minimizing the total energy of the twist bilayer using the same force field as the structural optimization (SI Section B). Used for the phase diagram in Fig. 2.
  • Out-of-plane Gaussian buckling parameters = height and width fitted to structure optimization at 1.02, 0.74, and 0.51 degrees
    Added to the model relaxation field; makes little change to electronic structure but improves relaxation energy (SI Section B).
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The exact map from two-center tight-binding Hamiltonians to continuum Hamiltonians holds (Rost et al., PRB 100, 035101 (2019)).
    This is the foundation of the continuum Hamiltonian in Eq. (2). The proof is referenced, not restated.
  • domain assumption The Kolmogorov-Crespi registry-dependent potential accurately describes interlayer interactions in bilayer graphene.
    Used for structural relaxation in LAMMPS (Methods IV.A). Validated against ACFDT-RPA stacking fault energies in SI Section A.
  • domain assumption The GAFF force field accurately describes intralayer C-C interactions in graphene.
    Used for structural relaxation (Methods IV.A).
  • domain assumption Interlayer bias enters as a rigid plus/minus V/2 on-site energy shift with no screening or band-structure renormalization.
    Standard in bilayer graphene modeling (Refs. 17,18); screening is neglected.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Perfect and controllable nesting in the small angle twist bilayer graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XLM4RQSL

@misc{pith2026190808318,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Perfect and controllable nesting in the small angle twist bilayer graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XLM4RQSL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08318}
}
read the original abstract

Parallel ("nested") regions of a Fermi surface (FS) drive instabilities of the electron fluid, for example the spin density wave in elemental chromium. In one-dimensional materials, the FS is trivially fully nested (a single nesting vector connects two "Fermi dots"), while in higher dimensions only a fraction of the FS consists of parallel sheets. We demonstrate that the tiny angle regime of twist bilayer graphene (TBLG) possess a phase, accessible by interlayer bias, in which the FS consists entirely of nestable "Fermi lines": the first example of a completely nested FS in a 2d material. This nested phase is found both in the ideal as well as relaxed structure of the twist bilayer. We demonstrate excellent agreement with recent STM images of topological states in this material and elucidate the connection between these and the underlying Fermiology. We show that the geometry of the "Fermi lines" network is controllable by the strength of the applied interlayer bias, and thus that TBLG offers unprecedented access to the physics of FS nesting in 2d materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08318 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (16 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Vertical (out-of-plane) relaxations of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Total energy difference ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Energy difference ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Energy of the ideal moir´e pattern and the relaxed twisted graphene bilayer in the bending [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Vertical (out-of-plane) relaxations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Vertical (out-of-plane) relaxations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Energy density distribution within twisted graphene bilayers for different twist angles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Energy density distribution for different structures of a twisted graphene bilayer with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Total energy of the twist bilayer under relaxation fields given by Eq. (6) with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Band structure of graphene calculated using the tight-binding method in the H¨uckel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Comparison of key structural and electronic features of the graphene twist bilayer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Shown are the density of states for a twist bilayer with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Fermiology and density of states for the ideal twist bilayer and the reconstructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Nesting phase diagram for the ideal twist bilayer, for bias [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: In a simplified model of the twist bilayer one has a two parameter theory: the Fermi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author Hass, J. et al. title Why multilayer graphene on 4h - SiC(000 1 ) behaves like a single sheet of graphene . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 125504 ( year 2008 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.125504

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.125504 2008

  2. [2]

    author Li, G. et al. title Observation of van hove singularities in twisted graphene layers . journal Nature Physics volume 6 , pages 109 ( year 2010 )

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    author de Laissardière, G. T. , author Mayou, D. & author Magaud, L. title Localization of dirac electrons in rotated graphene bilayers . journal Nano Letters volume 10 , pages 804--808 ( year 2010 ). ://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl902948m. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/nl902948m

    doi:10.1021/nl902948m 2010

  4. [4]

    , author Sharma, S

    author Shallcross, S. , author Sharma, S. , author Kandelaki, E. & author Pankratov, O. A. title Electronic structure of turbostratic graphene . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 81 , pages 165105 ( year 2010 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.165105

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.165105 2010

  5. [5]

    , author Sharma, S

    author Shallcross, S. , author Sharma, S. & author Pankratov, O. title Emergent momentum scale, localization, and van hove singularities in the graphene twist bilayer . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 87 , pages 245403 ( year 2013 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245403

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.245403 2013

  6. [6]

    author Weckbecker, D. et al. title Low-energy theory for the graphene twist bilayer . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 93 , pages 035452 ( year 2016 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.035452

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.035452 2016

  7. [7]

    & author MacDonald, A

    author Bistritzer, R. & author MacDonald, A. H. title Moire bands in twisted double-layer graphene . journal Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. volume 108 , pages 12233--12237 ( year 2011 )

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    author Cao, Y. et al. title Unconventional superconductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices . journal Nature volume 556 , pages 43 EP -- ( year 2018 ). ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature26160. note Article

    doi:10.1038/nature26160 2018

Show all 30 references
  1. [9]

    author Cao, Y. et al. title Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices . journal Nature volume 556 , pages 80 EP -- ( year 2018 ). ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature26154

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    author Dugdale, S. B. title Life on the edge: a beginner’s guide to the fermi surface . journal Physica Scripta volume 91 , pages 053009 ( year 2016 ). ://stacks.iop.org/1402-4896/91/i=5/a=053009

    2016

  3. [11]

    author Inosov, D. S. et al. title Fermi surface nesting in several transition metal dichalcogenides . journal New Journal of Physics volume 10 , pages 125027 ( year 2008 ). ://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/10/i=12/a=125027

    2008

  4. [12]

    , author Xiang, Y

    author Dai, S. , author Xiang, Y. & author Srolovitz, D. J. title Twisted Bilayer Graphene : Moiré with a Twist . journal Nano Letters volume 16 , pages 5923--5927 ( year 2016 ). ://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02870

    2016 doi

  5. [13]

    author Nam, N. N. T. & author Koshino, M. title Lattice relaxation and energy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphene . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 96 , pages 075311 ( year 2017 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075311

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    author Yoo, H. et al. title Atomic and electronic reconstruction at the van der Waals interface in twisted bilayer graphene . journal Nature Materials volume 18 , pages 448 ( year 2019 ). ://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-019-0346-z

    2019

  7. [15]

    author Alden, J. S. et al. title Strain solitons and topological defects in bilayer graphene . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 110 , pages 11256--11260 ( year 2013 ). ://www.pnas.org/content/110/28/11256. https://www.pnas.org/content/110/28/11256...

    2013

  8. [16]

    author Butz, B. et al. title Dislocations in bilayer graphene . journal Nature volume 505 , pages 533--537 ( year 2014 ). ://www.nature.com/articles/nature12780

    2014

  9. [17]

    author Zhang, Y. et al. title Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene . journal Nature volume 459 , pages 820 EP -- ( year 2009 ). ://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08105

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    , author Dong, G.-Y

    author Wang, R.-N. , author Dong, G.-Y. , author Wang, S.-F. , author Fu, G.-S. & author Wang, J.-L. title Intra- and inter-layer charge redistribution in biased bilayer graphene . journal AIP Advances volume 6 , pages 035213 ( year 2016 ). ://doi.org/10.1063/1.4944815. https:...

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    , author Sharma, S

    author Shallcross, S. , author Sharma, S. & author Weber, H. B. title Anomalous dirac point transport due to extended defects in bilayer graphene . journal Nature Communications volume 8 , pages 342 ( year 2017 )

    2017

  12. [20]

    author Kisslinger, F. et al. title Linear magnetoresistance in mosaic-like bilayer graphene . journal Nature Physics volume 11 , pages 650--653 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  13. [21]

    author Huang, S. et al. title Topologically Protected Helical States in Minimally Twisted Bilayer Graphene . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 121 , pages 037702 ( year 2018 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.037702

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    author Borisenko, S. V. et al. title Pseudogap and charge density waves in two dimensions . journal Phys. Rev. Lett. volume 100 , pages 196402 ( year 2008 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.196402

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    , author Choe, J

    author Chen, C.-W. , author Choe, J. & author Morosan, E. title Charge density waves in strongly correlated electron systems . journal Reports on Progress in Physics volume 79 , pages 084505 ( year 2016 ). ://stacks.iop.org/0034-4885/79/i=8/a=084505

    2016

  16. [24]

    title Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics

    author Plimpton, S. title Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics . journal Journal of Computational Physics volume 117 , pages 1 -- 19 ( year 1995 ). ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002199918571039X

    1995

  17. [25]

    , author Wolf, R

    author Wang, J. , author Wolf, R. M. , author Caldwell, J. W. , author Kollman, P. A. & author Case, D. A. title Development and testing of a general amber force field . journal Journal of Computational Chemistry volume 25 , pages 1157--1174 ( year 2004 ). ://onlinelibrary.wil...

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    author Kolmogorov, A. N. & author Crespi, V. H. title Registry-dependent interlayer potential for graphitic systems . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 71 , pages 235415 ( year 2005 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.235415

    2005 doi

  19. [27]

    author Rost, F. et al. title Nonperturbative theory of effective hamiltonians for deformations in two-dimensional materials: Moir\'e systems and dislocations . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 100 , pages 035101 ( year 2019 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.035101

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    , author Rost, F

    author Gupta, R. , author Rost, F. , author Fleischmann, M. , author Sharma, S. & author Shallcross, S. title Straintronics beyond homogeneous deformation . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 99 , pages 125407 ( year 2019 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.125407

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    , author Han, J

    author Zhou, S. , author Han, J. , author Dai, S. , author Sun, J. & author Srolovitz, D. J. title van der waals bilayer energetics: Generalized stacking-fault energy of graphene, boron nitride, and graphene/boron nitride bilayers . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 92 , pages 15543...

    2015 doi

  22. [30]

    , author Gupta, R

    author Weckbecker, D. , author Gupta, R. , author Rost, F. , author Sharma, S. & author Shallcross, S. title Dislocation and node states in bilayer graphene systems . journal Phys. Rev. B volume 99 , pages 195405 ( year 2019 ). ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195405

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.