Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.04626 v1 pith:XLTAPJ3T submitted 2021-02-09 physics.comp-ph cs.LG

classification physics.comp-phcs.LG
keywords constraintsdesignhpinninverseoptimizationhardmethodmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Inverse design arises in a variety of areas in engineering such as acoustic, mechanics, thermal/electronic transport, electromagnetism, and optics. Topology optimization is a major form of inverse design, where we optimize a designed geometry to achieve targeted properties and the geometry is parameterized by a density function. This optimization is challenging, because it has a very high dimensionality and is usually constrained by partial differential equations (PDEs) and additional inequalities. Here, we propose a new deep learning method -- physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints (hPINNs) -- for solving topology optimization. hPINN leverages the recent development of PINNs for solving PDEs, and thus does not rely on any numerical PDE solver. However, all the constraints in PINNs are soft constraints, and hence we impose hard constraints by using the penalty method and the augmented Lagrangian method. We demonstrate the effectiveness of hPINN for a holography problem in optics and a fluid problem of Stokes flow. We achieve the same objective as conventional PDE-constrained optimization methods based on adjoint methods and numerical PDE solvers, but find that the design obtained from hPINN is often simpler and smoother for problems whose solution is not unique. Moreover, the implementation of inverse design with hPINN can be easier than that of conventional methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LieSolver: PDE-Constrained Learning for IBVPs via Lie Symmetries

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LieSolver fits initial/boundary data with linear combinations of Lie-symmetry-generated base solutions, enforcing linear homogeneous PDEs exactly by construction.

Pith tools