Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Light crossing a thin shell around a slowly rotating black hole changes energy while keeping angular momentum and Carter constant fixed; the resulting jump in impact parameters produces double photon rings and step-like intensity features i

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 03:29 UTC pith:XTLS7V23

load-bearing objection A clean first-order derivation of photon impact-parameter jumps across a slow-Kerr thin shell, but the worked examples violate the paper's own slow-rotation limit and quote photon-region ranges that contradict its Eq. (3.3). the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2602.07923 v2 pith:XTLS7V23 submitted 2026-02-08 gr-qc

Signatures of the Israel Junction II: Double Photon Rings in Slowly Rotating Kerr Spacetime with Thin Shell

Long-Yue Li , Li-Ming Cao , Yungui Gong , Xia-Yuan Liu , Wenting Zhou This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s
keywords thin shellIsrael junction conditionsKerr spacetimephoton ringblack hole shadowaccretion disk imageslow rotationnull geodesics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

For a photon crossing a thin shell that joins two slowly rotating Kerr spacetimes, the paper claims that energy E changes while angular momentum L and Carter constant C are conserved, so the reduced impact parameters η and ξ jump discontinuously at the shell. Within the slow-rotation approximation (dropping (a/m)² terms), this transformation is used to ray-trace images of a thin equatorial accretion disk. The images show double photon rings that can merge into a single ring, shadow boundaries that no longer correspond one-to-one with photon rings, a step-like discontinuity in brightness from the abrupt redshift change, and a bright lensed spot near the rings. These features are absent in single-metric Kerr images, so they could, if observed with future instruments, test whether the Israel junction condition and thin-shell models describe real black holes and other compact objects.

Core claim

The central result is a transformation law for null rays at the junction surface of two slowly rotating Kerr metrics. Because the angular coordinate bases are identified and the photon's four-momentum is taken to be continuous across the shell, the angular momentum L and Carter constant C pass through unchanged, but the energy changes: E₁ = √(f₁/f₂) E₂ − [√(f₁/f₂)(2m₂a₂/R³ − 2m₁a₁/R³)] L, with f = 1−2m/r. This makes the impact parameters η=L/E and ξ=C/E² discontinuous at the shell. When these transformed parameters are fed into backward ray tracing of a thin equatorial disk, the paper finds double photon rings that merge for certain configurations, a step-like brightness jump caused by the r

What carries the argument

The engine of the argument is the Israel junction-condition transformation, applied to light rays: the coordinate-basis change between the two Kerr charts (Eqs. 2.7–2.8) together with the assumption that the photon four-momentum kᵃ is continuous across the shell. That combination fixes the energy E₁ as a linear function of E₂ and L (Eq. 2.10) while leaving L and C untouched, converting a C⁰ metric match into a jump in the impact parameters (η, ξ) that determine all null geodesics. Everything else — the double rings, the step, the bright spot — is a consequence of this single discontinuity in E and the resulting discontinuity in the redshift factor at the shell.

Load-bearing premise

The whole prediction depends on the photon's four-momentum vector being exactly continuous across the shell, an assumption the paper invokes from its companion analysis rather than deriving here; if the shell's surface stress transfers momentum to the photon, the energy jump and all resulting image features change.

What would settle it

Compute null geodesics through the same shell geometry without assuming kᵃ continuity — e.g., allowing the shell's surface stress to exchange momentum with the photon — and compare the resulting impact-parameter jumps; if the predicted double rings and step-like intensity discontinuities disappear for the paper's fiducial parameters (such as m−=0.6, a−=0.3, m+=1.13, a+=0.01, R=2.7), the model is falsified.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Images of thin-shell Kerr models should display two photon rings that merge into one for parameter choices where the inner shadow extends beyond the outer shadow.
  • A step-like jump in observed intensity should appear at the projected radius where rays cross the shell, caused by the discontinuous redshift factor.
  • The usual one-to-one link between shadow boundary and photon ring breaks: a ring-like brightness enhancement can persist even when the corresponding photon region is truncated by the shell.
  • None of these features occur in standard single-metric Kerr accretion-disk images, so they offer a concrete observational discriminator for shell-equipped spacetimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the shell has nonzero angular velocity, the energy jump formula would acquire additional terms involving the shell's rotation; the predicted double rings and steps would shift or disappear, suggesting a direct route to test the ZAMO-shell assumption.
  • The same impact-parameter jump should appear in slowly rotating wormhole geometries glued at a throat, a case the authors outline but do not compute; one would expect analogous merged rings there.
  • The step-like brightness feature may be confused with inner-shadow or ISCO-related structures in actual black-hole images, so distinguishing it will require modeling the disk's own emission profile.
  • A fully nonlinear calculation (beyond the (a/m)² truncation) may reveal whether the merging of rings is an artifact of the slow-rotation limit or a robust property of junction-discontinuity spacetimes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a thin-shell spacetime formed by matching two slowly rotating Kerr metrics at r=R, with the shell at rest in the ZAMO frame on both sides. Working to first order in spin, it derives transformation laws for photon impact parameters across the shell: L and C are conserved while E jumps, so η=L/E and ξ=C/E^2 transform via Eqs. (2.11) and (2.14). Using these transformations, the paper computes shadows and ray-traced images of an equatorial thin accretion disk, reporting double photon rings, merging rings, truncated-photon-region effects, and step-like intensity jumps. The central derivation is algebraic and internally consistent; the numerical demonstrations, however, are incomplete and partly inconsistent with the stated approximation.

Significance. If correct, the results would provide a concrete phenomenological difference between single-metric Kerr images and Israel-junction thin-shell models, potentially testable with EHT-class observations. The analytic transformation is a useful extension of earlier spherically symmetric thin-shell and wormhole studies, and the paper does not fit the central transformation to data, instead deriving it from a stated physical input. Its main weaknesses are that the examples used to exhibit the claimed features largely lie outside the slow-rotation regime declared in the paper, and several reported photon-region ranges disagree with the paper's own Eq. (3.3).

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, examples A, B, D, F; Eq. (3.3)] The paper's stated regime is (a/m)^2 << 1, but examples A, B, and F use a_-/m_- = 0.5, 0.4, and 0.5 respectively, so (a/m)^2 = 0.25, 0.16, 0.25 — comparable to the O(a) effects that produce the claimed double rings and merging. In addition, the photon-region ranges quoted in the text do not match Eq. (3.3). For example A, Eq. (3.3) with m_-=0.6, a_-=0.3 gives (1.45,2.15), but the text gives (1.33,2.10); for B it gives (2.54,3.46) vs (2.43,3.30); for D it gives (2.65,3.35) vs (2.60,2.70). This indicates that the numerical results were not generated from the equations as presented. Please rerun all examples with parameters satisfying (a/m)^2 << 1 and reconcile the reported ranges with Eq. (3.3), or extend the formalism to O(a^2)/full Kerr.
  2. [Section II, after Eq. (2.8)] The derivation of Eqs. (2.10)-(2.14) starts from the assertion that 'the four-vector of the photon k^a remains continuous across the shell [61]'. This is the load-bearing physical step: it converts a C^0 metric match into a jump in E and hence into all subsequent image features. The cited work [61] is the authors' own unpublished companion paper, and null tangents have affine-rescaling freedom, so the requirement is not automatic at the level stated. The manuscript should either derive this matching condition from the distributional geodesic equation or state and justify the affine-parameter convention explicitly. As written, the paper is not self-contained at its central point.
  3. [Section III, paragraph after Eq. (3.4) and Eq. (3.5)] The step-like intensity features and bright spots (e.g., Fig. 1(b)) are driven by the assumed discontinuity of the emitter four-velocity across Σ. In particular, the rule that matter inside the shell must use the interior ISCO constants 'even though this ISCO ... does not physically exist' is an ad hoc continuation. This choice directly controls the redshift factor (3.5) and therefore the claimed step structure. The authors should test the robustness of the step/bright-spot predictions to alternative disk-velocity models (for example, matching geodesic inflow constants through the shell, or truncating the disk emissivity at the shell) or explicitly qualify those signatures as model-dependent.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (3.3)] For a_- < 0, as in example F, the formula r_{max,min}=3m ± (2√3/3)a gives reversed ordering for the two roots. Please define r_min and r_max using |a| or specify the ordering convention.
  2. [Figures] Several figures, especially Fig. 8, have garbled axis labels and low readability. Please provide higher-quality figures and, if possible, a data/code availability statement so the ray-tracing results can be reproduced.
  3. [Eq. (3.6)] The intensity profile is written ambiguously; please display it unambiguously, e.g., I_em(r)=exp[-1/2 (ln(r/r_h))^2 - 2 ln(r/r_h)], and state which horizon radius is used.
  4. [Captions and text] Some figure captions contain grammatical errors ('the orange curve represents the shadow boundary corresponds to...'). These should be corrected throughout.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Quantitative transformation is derived in-paper, but the central physical input (continuity of k^a across the shell) is imported via the authors' own companion paper [61].

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section II, after Eq. (2.8); also Sec. II opening paragraph]
    "Since the four-vector of the photon k^a remains continuous across the shell [61], the angular momentum L of the photons does not change when they passage through the shell."

    This continuity assumption is the physical premise from which the paper derives the energy jump (2.10), the impact-parameter transformations (2.11) and (2.14), and hence all the claimed image features (double rings, merging, steps, truncated-photon-region rings). The premise is not derived or independently justified in this paper; it is referred to [61], an unpublished companion paper by three of the present authors (Cao, Li, Liu). Thus a load-bearing element of the derivation chain is supported only by a self-citation. However, once that premise is granted, the transformation algebra and ray-tracing are carried out in-paper and are not fitted to data, so the circularity is partial rather than total.

full rationale

The paper's quantitative core — the jump in E and the induced (η, ξ) transformation, Eqs. (2.10)–(2.14) — is derived algebraically from the shell coordinate transformation (2.5)–(2.8) once one accepts the continuity of k^a across Σ. No parameter is fitted to the images, and the double-ring, merging, and step-like morphologies are consequences of this transformation plus standard slow-rotation Kerr ray tracing; they are not renamings of the input. The one circularity-adjacent element is that the load-bearing physical input, 'k^a remains continuous across the shell', is asserted with reference to the authors' own companion paper [61] rather than derived or externally justified in this text. Because the subsequent derivation is independent of any empirical fit, the problem is a self-citation-supported premise rather than a derivation that is identical to its input. The numerical inconsistencies noted by the skeptic — examples using a/m = 0.4–0.5 while the paper states (a/m)^2 ≪ 1, and photon-region intervals disagreeing with Eq. (3.3) — are correctness/consistency concerns and are not counted as circularity under the rubric.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 8 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on one invented entity (the shell), a small set of hand-chosen geometric parameters (m±, a±, R per configuration), and two auxiliary modeling choices (emissivity profile, ISCO continuation). The core transformation (2.10)-(2.14) is derived, not fitted, and no real data are used anywhere. The phenomenology is therefore a forward computation, but its realism is bounded by the unexamined shell matter and the marginal slow-rotation parameters.

free parameters (7)
  • m- (interior mass) = 0.6, 1, 0.5, 1, 0.5, 0.6 (cases A-F)
    Hand-chosen so the inner photon region lies inside the shell radius and so the inner and outer rings land near each other in the image.
  • a- (interior spin) = 0.3, 0.4, 0.01, 0.3, 0.01, -0.3 (cases A-F)
    Hand-chosen. Case A has a-/m- = 0.5, giving (a/m)^2 = 0.25, which violates the stated slow-rotation condition (a/m)^2 << 1.
  • m+ (exterior mass) = 1.13, 1.2, 1.4, 1.33, 1.4, 1.13 (cases A-F)
    Hand-chosen; all exceed m- so that f jumps across the shell and the outer photon region sits close to the shell.
  • a+ (exterior spin) = 0.01, 0.3, 0.2, 0.01, 0.2, 0.1 (cases A-F)
    Hand-chosen; kept small in most cases so the exterior ring radius nearly matches the transformed interior ring radius, producing the merging effect.
  • R (shell radius) = 2.7, 3.3, 4.3, 2.7, 3.8, 2.7 (cases A-F)
    Hand-chosen to truncate one of the photon regions and to produce the merging/step features; e.g., R = 2.7 in case A cuts the outer photon region.
  • Disk emissivity profile (Eq. (3.6)) = log-normal in ln(r/r_h) with width 1/2
    Adopted from [71]; not derived from disk physics; controls the relative brightness of the rings and the visibility of the step.
  • ISCO continuation rule for the disk 4-velocity = Interior free-fall uses inner-ISCO constants even though that ISCO lies outside the shell
    Admitted by the authors ('even though this ISCO lies outside the shell and hence does not physically exist'); this rule creates the discontinuous emitter 4-velocity that produces the step-like redshift jumps.
axioms (8)
  • domain assumption Truncation of the Kerr metric at O(a), neglecting all O(a^2) terms (Eq. (2.1))
    Stated in Sec. II ('We ignore O(a^2) and higher-order terms'); never tested against exact Kerr, and the examples reach a-/m- = 0.5 where O(a^2) is not small.
  • domain assumption Photon 4-momentum k^a is continuous across the shell
    Invoked in Sec. II ('the four-vector of the photon k^a remains continuous across the shell [61]'); it is the input that produces the energy jump (2.10). Justified only by citation to [61], not derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper The shell is at rest in the ZAMO frame on both sides: dτ = sqrt(f) dt, dψ = dϕ - 2ma/r^3 dt (Eq. (2.3))
    This matching makes the induced metrics agree to O(a) (Eq. (2.4)). A shell with a different angular velocity would give a different transformation and different image features.
  • domain assumption Carter constant invariance to O(a^2): C = k_θ^2 + L^2 cot^2 θ (Eq. (2.13))
    Follows from k^a continuity plus dropping the a^2 E^2 term; the dropped term is not estimated for the a/m = 0.3-0.5 examples, where its relative size grows.
  • domain assumption First junction condition holds to O(a); second junction condition never checked
    The paper verifies only the induced-metric matching (2.2)-(2.4). The shell's surface stress-energy, and hence whether the model satisfies the Einstein equations with physical matter, is unverified—important given the stated goal of testing Israel junctions observationally.
  • standard math Photon regions are given by R(r) = R'(r) = 0 in the truncated metric (Eq. (3.2))
    Standard slow-rotation Kerr result; internally consistent (I verified (3.2) satisfies (3.1) to O(a)), but the bounds reported in Sec. III A/B/C disagree with the paper's own Eq. (3.3).
  • domain assumption Thin equatorial disk model: circular orbits outside ISCO, free-fall with ISCO constants inside (Sec. III)
    Standard disk model from [71]; the interior-side continuation is admitted to be non-physical, and it directly determines the step features.
  • domain assumption Emitted intensity profile I_em(r) = exp(-½(ln(r/r_h))^2) - 2 ln(r/r_h) (Eq. (3.6))
    Phenomenological profile borrowed from [71]; its peak and width are uncalibrated, affecting the relative ring intensities in the figures.
invented entities (1)
  • Static (ZAMO-comoving) thin shell at r = R joining two Kerr spacetimes no independent evidence
    purpose: Generates the energy/impact-parameter discontinuity that produces all the claimed image features (double rings, merging, steps, truncated rings).
    The shell's surface stress-energy is never computed, so its matter content is unknown. The proposed observable features are outputs of the model, not independent empirical handles; no externally checkable prediction (e.g., a fixed mass/radius relation) is offered.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 13775 in / 43657 out tokens · 387337 ms · 2026-08-03T03:29:38.930077+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Applying the junction conditions to the slowly rotating Kerr spacetime with a thin shell, when higher order terms in the spin parameter a can be neglected, we find that while the angular momentum $L$ and Carter constant $C$ of the ray remain unchanged upon crossing the shell, its energy $E$ does not. Consequently, the impact parameters $\eta=L/E$ and $\xi=C/E^2$ of the ray are discontinued at the shell. Utilizing this transformation, we study the shadow of this spacetime and the corresponding images from an equatorial thin accretion disk. The presence of the shell gives rise to distinctive features in the observed images. Notably, we observe distinct double photon rings in the images, which can gradually merge into a single ring. Moreover, the shadow boundaries and the photon rings do not exhibit a one-to-one correspondence. The abrupt changes in redshift factor and the truncated photon regions profoundly influence the image, producing distinctive features such as the step-like structures. These features in shell-equipped spacetimes can help evaluate, through future astronomical observations, the applicability of the Israel junction condition and the shell model in real astrophysical systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.07923 by Li-Ming Cao, Long-Yue Li, Wenting Zhou, Xia-Yuan Liu, Yungui Gong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The shadow (a), images (b) and enlarged view of the image (c) and (d) of slowly rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) The observed intensity of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The transfer function at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The shadow (a), images (b) and enlarged view of the image (c) and (d) of slowly rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The shadow (a), images (b) and enlarged view of the image (c) and (d) of slowly rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The shadow (a), images (b) and enlarged view of the image (c) and (d) of slowly rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The shadow (a), images (b) and enlarged view of the image (c) and (d) of slowly rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: The shadow (a), images (b) and enlarged view of the image (c) and (d) of slowly rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar produces families of regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes in GR, including new closed-form solutions involving hypergeo...

  2. Families of regular spacetimes and energy conditions

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A classification of admissible energy density profiles with bounded Kretschmann scalar yields a unified framework for regular static spherically symmetric spacetimes satisfying the weak energy condition, recovering kn...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    K. Eda, Y . Itoh, S. Kuroyanagi, and J. Silk, New Probe of Dark-Matter Properties: Gravitational Waves from an Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Embedded in a Dark-Matter Minispike, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 221101 (2013)

    2013

  2. [2]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter annihilation at the galactic center, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1719 (1999)

    1999

  3. [3]

    Gondolo and J

    P. Gondolo and J. Silk, Dark matter at the galactic center, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.87, 87 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cim. B44S10, 1 (1966), [Erratum: Nuovo Cim.B 48, 463 (1967)]

    1966

  5. [5]

    Darmois,Les ´equations de la gravitation einsteinienne, M ´emorial des sciences math ´ematiques No

    G. Darmois,Les ´equations de la gravitation einsteinienne, M ´emorial des sciences math ´ematiques No. 25 (Gauthier-Villars, 1927)

    1927

  6. [6]

    S. K. Blau, E. I. Guendelman, and A. H. Guth, The Dynamics of False Vacuum Bubbles, Phys. Rev. D35, 1747 (1987)

    1987

  7. [7]

    Aurilia, R

    A. Aurilia, R. S. Kissack, R. B. Mann, and E. Spallucci, Relativistic Bubble Dynamics: From Cosmic Inflation to Hadronic Bags, Phys. Rev. D35, 2961 (1987). 21

    1987

  8. [8]

    V . A. Berezin, V . A. Kuzmin, and I. I. Tkachev, Dynamics of Bubbles in General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D36, 2919 (1987)

    1987

  9. [9]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, Gravitational vacuum condensate stars, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.101, 9545 (2004)

    2004

  10. [10]

    Chapline, E

    G. Chapline, E. Hohlfeld, R. B. Laughlin, and D. I. Santiago, Quantum phase transitions and the breakdown of classical general relativity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A18, 3587 (2003)

    2003

  11. [11]

    Tsukamoto, Linearization stability of reflection-asymmetric thin-shell wormholes with double shadows, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Linearization stability of reflection-asymmetric thin-shell wormholes with double shadows, Phys. Rev. D103, 064031 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    Dutta and F

    A. Dutta and F. Rahaman, Thin-shell wormhole with a background Kalb-Ramond Field, arXiv:2510.23689

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  13. [13]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Mizuno, Z

    Y . Mizuno, Z. Younsi, C. M. Fromm, O. Porth, M. De Laurentis, H. Olivares, H. Falcke, M. Kramer, and L. Rezzolla, The Current Ability to Test Theories of Gravity with Black Hole Shadows, Nat. Astron.2, 585 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Uniyal, I

    A. Uniyal, I. K. Dihingia, Y . Mizuno, and L. Rezzolla, The future ability to test theories of gravity with black-hole shadows, Nat. Astron.1, 8 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    J. Peng, M. Guo, and X.-H. Feng, Influence of quantum correction on black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings, Chin. Phys. C45, 085103 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Y . Xu, H. Huang, M.-Y . Lai, and D.-C. Zou, Identifying doppelgange Black Holes through Shadow Images, arXiv:2407.06562

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Cao, L.-Y

    L.-M. Cao, L.-Y . Li, X.-Y . Liu, and Y .-S. Zhou, Appearance of the regular black hole with a stable inner horizon, Phys. Rev. D109, 064083 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Cao, L.-Y

    L.-M. Cao, L.-Y . Li, X.-Y . Liu, and Y .-S. Zhou, Appearance of de Sitter black holes and strong cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D109, 084021 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Cao, L.-Y

    L.-M. Cao, L.-Y . Li, and X.-Y . Liu, Image of Quantum Improved Regular Kerr Black Hole and Pa- rameter Constraints from EHT Observations, arXiv:2410.15745. 22

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Sui, Z.-L

    T.-T. Sui, Z.-L. Wang, and W.-D. Guo, The effect of scalar hair on the charged black hole with the images from accretions disk, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 441 (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Xiong, J

    Y . Xiong, J. Pu, Y . Ling, G.-P. Li, and G.-M. Deng, Investigating the shadows of new regular black holes with a Minkowski core: Effects of spherical accretion and core type differences, Chin. Phys. C 49, 095101 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Meng, X.-M

    Y . Meng, X.-M. Kuang, X.-J. Wang, B. Wang, and J.-P. Wu, Images from disk and spherical accretions of hairy Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 064013 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Q. Gan, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, Photon ring and observational appearance of a hairy black hole, Phys. Rev. D104, 044049 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Q. Gan, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, Photon spheres and spherical accretion image of a hairy black hole, Phys. Rev. D104, 024003 (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    G. Guo, Y . Lu, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, Black holes with multiple photon spheres, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124037 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Y . Chen, P. Wang, and H. Yang, Interferometric signatures of black holes with multiple photon spheres, Phys. Rev. D110, 044020 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y . Hou, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Imaging thick accretion disks and jets surrounding black holes, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2024) 032

    2024

  30. [30]

    Y . Shen, Y . Hou, Z.-Y . Fan, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Imaging a Semi-Analytical Jet model Generated by 3D GRMHD Simulation, arXiv:2311.14954

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Zhang, S

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Images of Kerr-MOG black holes surrounded by geometrically thick magnetized equilibrium tori, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 09 (2024) 027

    2024

  32. [32]

    Liang, S

    Y . Liang, S. Guo, K. Lin, Y .-H. Cui, Y .-X. Huang, and T. Yu, Image of the time-dependent black hole, Phys. Lett. B868, 139745 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Wang, C.-Y

    M. Wang, C.-Y . Zhang, S. Chen, and J. Jing, Dynamic shadow of a black hole with a self-interacting massive complex scalar hair, arXiv:2507.20569

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Wang, M.-D

    Y .-Y . Wang, M.-D. Zhao, X.-Y . Wang, and G.-P. Li, The extended inner shadow of Kerr-Taub-NUT black hole with thin disk flows, arXiv:2511.06219

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Li, X.-Y

    L.-Y . Li, X.-Y . Liu, R.-G. Cai, Y . Gong, and W. Zhou, Images and photo regions of continous photon sphere spacetime, arXiv:2508.12002

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Shaikh and P

    R. Shaikh and P. S. Joshi, Can we distinguish black holes from naked singularities by the images of their accretion disks?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 10 (2019) 064. 23

    2019

  37. [37]

    Gyulchev, J

    G. Gyulchev, J. Kunz, P. Nedkova, T. Vetsov, and S. Yazadjiev, Observational signatures of strongly naked singularities: image of the thin accretion disk, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1017 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Gyulchev, P

    G. Gyulchev, P. Nedkova, T. Vetsov, and S. Yazadjiev, Image of the thin accretion disk around compact objects in the Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 885 (2021)

    2021

  39. [39]

    Y . Chen, P. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yang, Observations of orbiting hot spots around naked singularities, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2024) 032

    2024

  40. [40]

    Deliyski, G

    V . Deliyski, G. Gyulchev, P. Nedkova, and S. Yazadjiev, Observing naked singularities with the present and next-generation Event Horizon Telescope, Phys. Rev. D111, 064068 (2025)

    2025

  41. [41]

    Wu and Y

    T. Wu and Y . Chen, Distinguishing the observational signatures of hot spots orbiting Reissner- Nordstr¨om spacetime*, Chin. Phys. C48, 075103 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Shaikh, P

    R. Shaikh, P. Kocherlakota, R. Narayan, and P. S. Joshi, Shadows of spherically symmetric black holes and naked singularities, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.482, 52 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    Hassan Puttasiddappa, D

    P. Hassan Puttasiddappa, D. C. Rodrigues, and D. F. Mota, Shadows of naked singularity in Brans- Dicke gravity, arXiv:2505.23204

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Huang, J

    H. Huang, J. Kunz, and D. Mitra, Shadow images of compact objects in beyond Horndeski theory, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 05 (2024) 007

    2024

  45. [45]

    Huang, J

    H. Huang, J. Kunz, J. Yang, and C. Zhang, Light ring behind wormhole throat: Geodesics, images, and shadows, Phys. Rev. D107, 104060 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Y . Chen, L. Cheng, P. Wang, and H. Yang, Observational signatures of traversable wormholes*, Chin. Phys. C49, 045110 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. S.-C. G ´omez, New light rings from multiple critical curves as observational signatures of black hole mimickers, Phys. Lett. B829, 137045 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Guerrero, G

    M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. G´omez S´aez-Chill´on, Light ring images of double photon spheres in black hole and wormhole spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D105, 084057 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Guo, G.-R

    S. Guo, G.-R. Li, and E.-W. Liang, Optical appearance of a thin-shell wormhole with a Hayward profile, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 663 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    J. Peng, M. Guo, and X.-H. Feng, Observational signature and additional photon rings of an asymmet- ric thin-shell wormhole, Phys. Rev. D104, 124010 (2021)

    2021

  51. [51]

    Z. Luo, H. Yu, and J. Li, Observational appearance and additional photon rings of the asymmetric thin-shell wormhole in Horndeski theory, Phys. Rev. D109, 104006 (2024). 24

    2024

  52. [52]

    J. L. Rosa and D. Rubiera-Garcia, Shadows of boson and Proca stars with thin accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D106, 084004 (2022)

    2022

  53. [53]

    Huang, S.-X

    L.-X. Huang, S.-X. Sun, Y .-P. Zhang, Z.-H. Zhao, and Y .-Q. Wang, Orbits of photon in Bardeen-boson stars and their frozen states, arXiv:2503.14984

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    H. L. Tamm and J. L. Rosa, Observational properties of hot spots orbiting relativistic fluid spheres, Phys. Rev. D109, 044062 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    Li, M.-Q

    G.-P. Li, M.-Q. Wu, K.-J. He, and Q.-Q. Jiang, Observational features of massive boson stars with thin disk accretion, arXiv:2505.14734

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  56. [56]

    Zhao, Y .-N

    Z.-H. Zhao, Y .-N. Gu, S.-C. Liu, Z.-Q. Liu, and Y .-Q. Wang, Light Rings, Accretion Disks and Shad- ows of Hayward Boson Stars in asymptotically AdS Spacetime, arXiv:2507.09563

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [57]

    Guerrero, G

    M. Guerrero, G. J. Olmo, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. S ´aez-Chill´on G ´omez, Multiring images of thin accretion disk of a regular naked compact object, Phys. Rev. D106, 044070 (2022)

    2022

  58. [58]

    G. J. Olmo, J. L. Rosa, D. Rubiera-Garcia, and D. Saez-Chillon Gomez, Shadows and photon rings of regular black holes and geonic horizonless compact objects, Classical Quantum Gravity40, 174002 (2023)

    2023

  59. [59]

    X. Wang, X. Wang, H.-Q. Zhang, and M. Guo, Is a photon ring invariably a closed structure?, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 1168 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Wang, P.-C

    X. Wang, P.-C. Li, C.-Y . Zhang, and M. Guo, Novel shadows from the asymmetric thin-shell worm- hole, Phys. Lett. B811, 135930 (2020)

    2020

  61. [61]

    Cao, L.-Y

    L.-M. Cao, L.-Y . Li, and X.-Y . Liu, Imaging Signatures of the Israel Junction: Photon Ring Evolution in Dynamical Thin Shell Schwarzschild Spacetimes, arXiv:2511.13077

    arXiv

  62. [62]

    Y . Koga, N. Asaka, M. Kimura, and K. Okabayashi, Shadow formation in gravitational collapse: Redshift and blueshift by spacetime dynamics, Phys. Rev. D112, 044069 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    J. P. Krisch and E. N. Glass, Counter-rotating Kerr manifolds separated by a fluid shell, Classical Quantum Gravity26, 175010 (2009)

    2009

  64. [64]

    Pfister and K

    H. Pfister and K. H. Braun, A mass shell with flat interior cannot rotate rigidly, Classical and Quantum Gravity3, 335 (1986)

    1986

  65. [65]

    De La Cruz and W

    V . De La Cruz and W. Israel, Spinning Shell as a Source of the Kerr Metric, Phys. Rev.170, 1187 (1968)

    1968

  66. [66]

    L. S. Kegeles, Collapse to a rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D18, 1020 (1978). 25

    1978

  67. [67]

    W.-L. Qian, S. Chen, C.-G. Shao, B. Wang, and R.-H. Yue, Cuspy and fractured black hole shadows in a toy model with axisymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 91 (2022)

    2022

  68. [68]

    Gyulchev, P

    G. Gyulchev, P. Nedkova, V . Tinchev, and S. Yazadjiev, On the shadow of rotating traversable worm- holes, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 544 (2018)

    2018

  69. [69]

    M. A. Raza, F. Tello-Ortiz, M. Zubair, and Y . G ´omez-Leyton, Some optical properties of rotating wormhole in Bopp-Podolsky electrodynamics, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 04 (2025) 065

    2025

  70. [70]

    Gayen and R

    P. Gayen and R. Koley, Decoding Horizonless Spacetime: Plasma-Induced Features in a Rotating Wormhole Shadow, arXiv:2511.07967

    arXiv

  71. [71]

    Y . Hou, Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo, and B. Chen, Image of a Kerr-Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk, Phys. Rev. D106, 064058 (2022)

    2022

  72. [72]

    Then, following the method outlined in Sec

    to a static spherically symmetric wormhole and neglecting terms of orderO(a 2), we obtain the slow-rotation approximation for this wormhole. Then, following the method outlined in Sec. II, we can derive the transformations forηandξ. Finally, this allows us to visualize and obtain an intuitive image of this slowly rotating wormhole. Our future work will fo...

  73. [73]

    Azreg-A ¨ınou, Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification, Phys

    M. Azreg-A ¨ınou, Generating rotating regular black hole solutions without complexification, Phys. Rev. D90, 064041 (2014)

    2014