Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above

As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.14127.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2502.14127 v2

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 3 of 3 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00

measured 3 of 3 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T05:38:24.830582Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-03T05:27:40.324248Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 7cc104ec-fed8-4403-a680-f6a696278730 · inbound

Visual Compositional Tuning cites this paper.

Visual Compositional Tuning Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above

Reference 2

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-22T17:41:53.171030Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-05-22T17:39:09.890605Z digest=sha256:faa9775e28559b4d25d17aaae269317e809be2385a91aa3d0c0a4b60eba665da

Observation c8e6d571-1cd2-4819-b888-b23386e77b0c · inbound

From Calibration to Collaboration: LLM Uncertainty Quantification Should Be More Human-Centered cites this paper.

From Calibration to Collaboration: LLM Uncertainty Quantification Should Be More Human-Centered Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above

Reference 2024

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T05:38:24.830582Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T05:38:24.830582Z digest=sha256:9fc456e4cda8d86ba8e1bac484f7abbbeb09136a2b7af96d704d9b91f6d93a02

Observation 48189976-0062-485b-8128-1290e3101f2d · inbound

Are We Evaluating Knowledge or Phrasing? Mitigating MCQA Sensitivity with ParaEval cites this paper.

Are We Evaluating Knowledge or Phrasing? Mitigating MCQA Sensitivity with ParaEval Which of These Best Describes Multiple Choice Evaluation with LLMs? A) Forced B) Flawed C) Fixable D) All of the Above

Reference 2

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-03T05:27:40.325986Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-09T06:31:02.800959+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-27T13:13:21.687950Z digest=sha256:07e94e6e211c072c970df683571423d21a9f00ee90bef5e3a22747c6cf8691c5