REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding Interquark Force and Quark Masses in Perturbative QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
This lecture note presents a self-contained introduction to the theory of a heavy quark-antiquark ($Q\bar{Q}$) system in terms of perturbative QCD. The lecture is intended for non-experts, such as graduate course students. The heavy $Q\bar{Q}$ system serves as an ideal laboratory for testing various aspects of QCD: We can examine the nature of renormalons in perturbative series; an effective field theory Potential-NRQCD is constructed, whose derivation from full QCD can be traced stepwise; we see absorption of renormalons by non-perturbative matrix elements in OPE clearly; a systematic short-distance expansion of UV contributions can be performed, which predicts a "Coulomb+linear" potential in perturbative QCD; we can test these theoretical formulations by comparison to lattice computations, where we observe a significant overlap with perturbative regime; finally we can test our microscopic understanding by comparing to experimental data for the bottomonium states. These subjects are covered in a concise and elementary manner. Overall, we provide a microscopic description of the main dynamics of a heavy $Q\bar{Q}$ system, as an example for which theoretical framework, practical computations and qualitative understanding have been most advanced.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Thermal Static Potential and Pseudo-Scalar Quarkonium Spectral Functions from 2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD
Pseudoscalar quarkonium spectral functions built from a non-perturbative complex thermal potential show eta_c close to melting at 1.6 Tpc while eta_b remains a narrow, well-defined state.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.