REVIEW 1 cited by
Comparison of dynamical and kinematic reference frames via pulsar positions from timing, Gaia, and interferometric astrometry
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Pulsars are special objects whose positions can be determined independently from timing, radio interferometric, and Gaia astrometry at sub-milliarcsecond (mas) precision; thus, they provide a unique way to monitor the link between dynamical and kinematic reference frames. We aimed to assess the orientation consistency between the dynamical reference frame represented by the planetary ephemeris and the kinematic reference frames constructed by Gaia and VLBI through pulsar positions. We identified 49 pulsars in Gaia Data Release 3 and 62 pulsars with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) positions from the PSR$\pi$ and MSPSR$\pi$ projects and searched for the published timing solutions of these pulsars. We then compared pulsar positions measured by timing, VLBI, and Gaia to estimate the orientation offsets of the ephemeris frames with respect to the Gaia and VLBI reference frames by iterative fitting. We found orientation offsets of $\sim$10 mas in the DE200 frame with respect to the Gaia and VLBI frame. Our results depend strongly on the subset used in the comparison and could be biased by underestimated errors in the archival timing data, reflecting the limitation of using the literature timing solutions to determine the frame rotation.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Unlocking the hidden potential of pulsar astronomy
This review and feasibility study shows that compact radio receivers can detect bright pulsars for navigation, timing, randomness, and space weather applications, with a 4-meter dish potentially achieving 10 km self-l...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.