Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 186 references

Dissecting Exclusive Multijet Cross Sections

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For any resolution variable that is continuously global and recursively IR safe, the leading-power exclusive n-jet cross section factorizes into beam, jet, and soft functions, and one k_T-ness variant factorizes into cumulant functions to…

desk verdict A serious framework paper with an all-order k_T-ness claim that hinges on an unproven clustering monotonicity property; worth refereeing, but the referee should press on that claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.06612 v1 pith:Y56GZMOI submitted 2025-09-08 hep-ph

Jürg Haag This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords perturbativeQCDjetphysicsfactorizationmethodofregionsresolutionvariablesrapiditydivergencesk_T-nessNNLOslicing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a general method for the leading-power behavior of exclusive $n$-jet cross sections when a resolution variable $q$ is cut at $q_{\rm cut}\ll Q$. For any infrared-safe resolution variable that is continuously global and recursively infrared safe, the cross section is shown to factorize into hard, beam, jet, and soft functions, with the phase space expanded by the method of regions. The central payoff is a practical slicing framework: the fixed-order expansion of the factorized formula supplies the ingredients for NNLO calculations of arbitrary resolution variables, not only observables with known resummations. As an application, the paper defines a version of $k_T$-ness using winner-take-all recombination and no beam recoil whose leading-power approximation is a maximum over sectors, so the factorized convolution collapses into a product of cumulant functions to all orders. A new rapidity regularization, the $z_N$-prescription, renders the beam and jet functions finite and absorbs zero-bin contributions into a soft subtracted function suitable for numerical integration.

What carries the argument

The machinery has three moving parts. The method of regions with a power-counting polytope selects the unique contributing region per sector decomposition for admissible variables, and produces the leading-power phase space expansion, including the recoil of final-state collinear sectors against soft and initial-state-collinear radiation. The all-order factorized ansatz for squared matrix elements in mixed soft-collinear limits converts the cross section into a convolution of fully differential beam, jet, and soft functions. For variables whose leading-power limit is a maximum of sector-level pieces, the identity $\theta(q_{\rm cut}-\max_i a_i)=\prod_i \theta(q_{\rm cut}-a_i)$ turns that convolution into a product of cumulant functions. The $z_N$-prescription regularizes rapidity divergences by replacing selected momentum fractions with energy fractions defined through a time-like reference vector $N$, and its zero-bin contributions are absorbed into a soft subtracted function that is free of rapidity divergences and suitable for numerical evaluation.

What would settle it

Compute the first correction to the winner-take-all, no-recoil $k_T$-ness cumulant cross section from the non-factorizing soft-exchange diagrams that the paper's ansatz misses, expected beyond NNLO in the class responsible for super-leading logarithms, and check whether it can be absorbed into the product of beam, jet, and soft functions; an irreducible remainder would falsify the all-order factorization as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the exclusive $n$-jet limit is governed by a single leading-power phase-space factorization rather than by observable-specific accidents. After decomposing the final state into two initial-state collinear sectors, one collinear sector per hard jet, and one soft sector, the phase space factors into a Born phase space and independent radiation phase spaces, and the squared QCD matrix element factors, under the paper's ansatz, into a hard density matrix times beam, soft, and jet kernels. For resolution variables that satisfy continuous globalness and recursive infrared safety, the approximated resolution variable in each region has homogeneous scaling, so the cumulant cross section below $q_{\rm cut}$ is a single convolution of fully differential beam, jet, and soft functions. When the leading-power variable is a maximum of sector-level variables, the convolution becomes a product of cumulant functions; the paper shows that $k_T$-ness with winner-take-all recombination and no beam recoil has exactly this property, making its factorization exact to all orders in perturbation theory under the stated ansatz.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the squared QCD matrix element in simultaneous soft and collinear limits factorizes into separate soft and collinear kernels; the paper itself notes that this ansatz is broken at higher orders by Glauber effects.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The factorized formula supplies ready-made beam, jet, and soft functions for NNLO slicing with any admissible resolution variable, removing the need for a dedicated all-order resummation before a slicing method can be built.
  • The $z_N$-prescription gives rapidity-finite beam and jet functions and a soft subtracted function that can be evaluated numerically, for both classes of resolution variables that previously required different effective-field-theory treatments.
  • The winner-take-all, no-recoil version of $k_T$-ness is the most convenient slicing variable for pushing beyond NNLO, because its cumulant factorization holds to all orders in perturbation theory under the paper's ansatz.
  • For E-scheme or recoil-collecting definitions of $k_T$-ness, the NNLO violations of the product formula are contained in the finite correction terms $J_{SN,i}$ and $B_{SN,i}$, which can be integrated numerically.
  • The framework explains why variables such as $\sqrt{B_T\tau}$ resist this treatment: their power-counting polytope has more than one corner for a fixed sector decomposition, so they are not recursively infrared safe.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the maximum-structure criterion is what drives cumulant factorization, other recoil-free, winner-take-all style observables may admit all-order cumulant-space factorization by the same argument; a natural test is to check whether a WTA variant of each existing jet-resolution variable also satisfies the max property.
  • Should the non-factorizing soft-exchange corrections turn out to be numerically relevant beyond NNLO, the all-order statement would need revision, but the NNLO slicing logic would survive because the factorized ansatz holds at that order; quantifying the first such correction to the WTA $k_T$-ness cumulant would map the practical range of the claim.
  • The failure mode of $\sqrt{B_T\tau}$ suggests a practical diagnostic: run the region-polytope analysis for any proposed observable, and if a fixed sector decomposition yields more than one finite corner, expect that a single product of beam, jet, and soft functions will not capture the leading-power cross section.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a method-of-regions framework for the leading-power description of exclusive multijet cross sections in the limit where a resolution variable q is much smaller than the hard scale Q. The author introduces an explicit phase-space parametrization that factorizes radiation in beam, jet, and soft sectors while tracking recoil (Sec. 4.1), combines it with a factorized ansatz for squared matrix elements (Eq. 3.36) to obtain a master factorization formula (Eq. 4.33) in terms of differential beam, jet, and soft functions, and shows that variables whose leading-power approximation is the maximum over sectors factorize into products of cumulant functions (Sec. 4.3). To treat SCET II-type variables, the author defines a rapidity regulator, the z_N-prescription, which replaces selected longitudinal momentum fractions by energy fractions, and demonstrates a zero-bin subtraction scheme that assembles all zero bins into a rapidity-finite soft-subtracted function (Sec. 5). The framework is then applied to the k_T-ness variable (Sec. 6): a region-by-region analysis at NNLO is given for E-scheme and winner-take-all (WTA) recombination, with and without beam recoil, including explicit factorization-breaking terms JSN,i and BSN. The WTA/no-recoil variant is claimed to factorize in cumulant space to all orders in perturbation theory.

Significance. If the framework is correct, it supplies a general slicing formalism for NNLO multijet calculations and a systematic method-of-regions alternative to SCET-based factorization derivations, together with a new rapidity regulator applicable to both SCET I and SCET II variables. The paper has substantial strengths: the recoil-aware phase-space expansion of Sec. 4.1 is carefully developed; the zero-bin hierarchy culminating in Eqs. (5.64)-(5.67) is an explicit, non-trivial construction; Appendix F provides analytic NLO cumulant jet functions for a generic class of resolution variables; and the derivations are parameter-free, with no fitting or introduced free parameters. The paper is also commendably explicit about its own limitations, including the Glauber-dependence of Eq. (3.36) and the deferral of beam and gluon z_N kernels to future work. The headline all-order claim, however, rests on an unproven monotonicity assertion about WTA clustering distances (Sec. 6.2), which is a falsifiable kinematic statement; this is the main correctness risk and should be resolved before the all-order conclusions are relied upon.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 6.2, paragraph after Eq. (6.33)] The conclusion that WTA/no-recoil k_T-ness satisfies Eq. (4.54) 'to all orders' rests entirely on the unproven assertion that the leading-power clustering distances d_1,...,d_k are nondecreasing, i.e., max(d) = d_k. This step is load-bearing: it is the only step that upgrades the NNLO analysis to the all-order cumulant factorization advertised in the abstract. The NNLO checks in Eqs. (6.31)-(6.33) cannot establish the general case, and the assertion is not a consequence of the cited literature, especially because the paper's WTA scheme deviates from Ref. [171]: Eq. (6.5) sets k_Tij = |k_ti + k_tj|, and the third distance measure in Eq. (6.2) has |k_ti + k_tj| in the denominator, so for two wide-angle soft particles the post-clustering transverse momentum can lie below the winner's transverse momentum. The claim is directly falsifiable by a kinematic scan over configurations with three or more emissions. Please either supply a proof (for instance, by arguing sector by sector that every post-clustering distance is a pre-clustering distance or a nondecreasing function of pre-clustering distances) or state the all-order claim as a conjecture and restrict the proven factorization to NNLO.
  2. [Abstract; Sec. 3.3 and Sec. 2] The abstract advertises a factorization formula for 'generic resolution variables' and a variable that factorizes 'to all orders in perturbation theory', but Sec. 3.3 states that the factorized ansatz (3.36) 'is broken at higher orders due to Glauber effects'. The all-order factorization statements of Secs. 4 and 6 therefore hold only modulo Glauber corrections, and the 'generic' claims additionally depend on the three conjectures of Sec. 2 (finite corners of the polytope R, uniform scaling within each sector, and the equivalence of single-region dominance with continuous globalness and recursive IR safety). The abstract and the theorem-level statements should carry these qualifiers; as written, the advertised conclusions are stronger than what the manuscript proves.
  3. [Sec. 5.3; Eqs. (5.32), (6.36), (6.40)] The z_N-prescription is constructed explicitly only for quark jet functions; the text states that modifications for beam functions and gluon jet functions are left to future work. Nevertheless, the NNLO hadron-collider k_T-ness factorization formulas (6.36) and (6.40) are written using beam and gluon-jet ingredients defined through (5.33), and the statement that the soft-subtracted functions (5.44)-(5.67) are 'already fully general' is an existence assertion about definitions that are not constructed in the manuscript. Since one advertised purpose is a slicing framework for NNLO hadron-collider processes, the paper should state explicitly which NNLO ingredients are complete and mark Eqs. (6.36) and (6.40) as provisional for gluon-initiated processes and for initial-state contributions.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout Section 6] The resolution variable is typeset as 'kness_t', which reads as an unfinished placeholder; please use a properly typeset name such as k_T-ness or a dedicated symbol throughout.
  2. [Sec. 5.3, Eqs. (5.19)-(5.20)] The plus-distribution identity for 1/z_N is the core of the scheme, but the remainder is only characterized as O(λ); a sentence stating where this remainder is dropped in the leading-power cumulant functions would improve the presentation. The 'smooth extension' from SCET I to SCET II variables in the same subsection would also benefit from a precise order-of-limits statement.
  3. [Sec. 2, Eqs. (2.13)-(2.17)] The mapping between the exponents (a,b,c) and the exponents (\tilde a, \tilde b) of Ref. [85] is difficult to parse; a short derivation of Eq. (2.17), or an explicit pointer, would help readers. Given that the framework's scope rests on the three conjectures in this section, a summary list of 'assumptions versus proven statements' would also improve the paper's usability.
  4. [Fig. 1] The polytope R for \sqrt{B_T \tau} is informative, but the axes and the plotted marker coordinates are not labeled in the caption; please state them explicitly so that the two corners and the one-emission scaling point can be read off directly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the generic factorization is derived from explicitly stated phase-space and matrix-element inputs, and the WTA all-order claim rests on an unproven monotonicity lemma that is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) expand the exact phase space by the method of regions (Section 4.1); (ii) insert the squared-matrix-element factorization ansatz (3.36), which the paper explicitly presents as an assumption and flags as broken by Glauber effects at higher orders; (iii) combine these inputs into the general factorization formula (4.33); (iv) simplify the formula when the resolution variable has special forms such as the max-form (4.54), where the cumulant product factorization (4.56) follows from the algebraic identity for theta functions. No data are fitted and no parameter is tuned to a target observable, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction pattern. The all-order cumulant factorization claim for WTA/no-recoil kT-ness is obtained by checking the max-form region by region at NNLO and then extending to all orders using the assertion that WTA clustering distances are nondecreasing at leading power. That monotonicity assertion is unproven and would require a kinematic proof or a counterexample search; however, it is not circular, because it is not equivalent to the factorization formula by definition and is not imported from the authors' own prior results. Self-citations to Refs. [15], [86], and [144] are used as prior definitions of kT-ness, as a comparison for the wide-angle soft function, and as the origin of the zN-prescription, respectively; none of these citations is load-bearing for the new claims. The paper candidly states in Section 3.3 that the all-order ansatz (3.36) is broken by Glauber effects and that the framework is currently used only for NNLO calculations, which further removes any appearance of an unstated circular premise. Overall, the central derivation is self-contained given its stated assumptions, and the main open issues are correctness risks (Glauber effects, unproven monotonicity of WTA distances), not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical particles, forces, or dimensions. The z_N prescription is a regularization scheme and the soft subtracted function is a mathematical construct, neither of which is a physical entity. The key assumptions are the Glauber-free factorization ansatz, standard PDF factorization, and the region-identification conjectures, all explicitly acknowledged in the text.

assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Leading-power factorization ansatz for squared matrix elements in mixed soft/collinear limits (Eq. 3.36), neglecting Glauber effects.
    Section 3.3 states 'This paper assumes a factorized ansatz...' and acknowledges it is broken at higher orders by Glauber effects. All factorization formulas in Section 4 depend on this ansatz.
  • domain assumption Standard PDF factorization for the initial state (Eq. 1.1) with p_Lambda > 0.
    The analysis starts from the assumption that PDF factorization holds, stated in Eq. (1.1) and the surrounding text.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture: finite corners of the polytope R correspond to all relevant leading-power regions, and continuous globalness/recursive IR safety guarantee a single contributing region with sector-independent scalings.
    Section 2, around Eqs. (2.13)-(2.15), introduces these as conjectures used to identify the relevant regions. They are not proven.
  • standard math Scaleless phase-space integrals from over-resolved regions vanish in dimensional regularization.
    Used throughout the method-of-regions expansion, for example in Section 2 after Eq. (2.11), to discard regions with unconstrained phase space.
  • ad hoc to paper The z_N prescription can be extended to all orders and to beam and gluon jet functions, including triple-collinear splittings.
    Section 5.3 and the Conclusion state that z_N-modified initial-state collinear splitting kernels and z_N-modified gluon triple-collinear splitting kernels have not been defined yet. The all-order factorization claims for WTA k_T-ness depend on this extension.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissecting Exclusive Multijet Cross Sections." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y56GZMOI

@misc{pith2026250906612,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissecting Exclusive Multijet Cross Sections},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Y56GZMOI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.06612}
}
abstract

This paper studies multijet cross sections in the kinematic limit where one or more of the jets are unresolved. We study the asymptotic expansion of the cross section by using the method of regions. We explain in large generality how to identify the relevant phase space regions and derive the leading-power approximation of the phase space. The leading-power phase space factorizes into a hard phase space and a radiation phase space for each collinear sector and the soft sector. Using the infrared factorization properties of squared matrix elements at leading power, we derive a factorization formula for generic resolution variables describing the exclusive n-jet limit in terms of fully differential beam, jet, and soft functions. We show how the factorization formula can be simplified for specific resolution variables. We regularize rapidity divergences in the beam and jet functions using a time-like reference vector, a method we call the ``$z_N$-prescription'', and demonstrate how the associated zero-bin contributions combine with the soft function to define a soft subtracted function free of rapidity divergences and suitable for numerical evaluation. The $z_N$-prescription can be used both for $\mathrm{SCET}_{\mathrm{II}}$- and $\mathrm{SCET}_{\mathrm{I}}$-type resolution variables. As an application of our framework, we derive factorization formulas for several transverse-momentum-like variables, and we present a variable that factorizes into simple cumulant functions to all orders in perturbation theory.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.06612 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The figure shows the polytope R of scalings (b, c) that lead to d ≥ 1 for the case where we have one collinear emission along p3 and a soft emission. The red points show the scaling dimensions that need to be included in the region expansion for the cross section. The purple diamond shows the scaling dimensions that one would have deduced from studying the one-emission phase space. matrix elements in the singular li… view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

186 extracted references · 155 linked inside Pith

  1. [15]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, J. Haag, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Effective transverse momentum in multiple jet production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 014008 [2201.11519]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [86]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, J. Haag, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Exploring slicing variables for jet processes,JHEP12(2023) 193 [2307.11570]

    arXiv 2023

  3. [171]

    Bertolini, T

    D. Bertolini, T. Chan and J. Thaler,Jet Observables Without Jet Algorithms,JHEP04 (2014) 013 [1310.7584]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [1]

    Currie, E.W.N

    J. Currie, E.W.N. Glover and J. Pires,Next-to-Next-to Leading Order QCD Predictions for Single Jet Inclusive Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.118(2017) 072002 [1611.01460]

    arXiv 2017

  5. [2]

    Currie, A

    J. Currie, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss and J. Pires, Precise predictions for dijet production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 152001 [1705.10271]

    arXiv 2017

  6. [3]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss and J. Pires,Triple Differential Dijet Cross Section at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 102001 [1905.09047]

    arXiv 2019

  7. [4]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. van Hameren, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,Single-jet inclusive rates with exact color atO(α 4 s),JHEP10(2019) 262 [1907.12911]. – 67 –

    arXiv 2019

  8. [5]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss and J. Mo,NNLO QCD corrections in full colour for jet production observables at the LHC,JHEP09(2022) 025 [2204.10173]

    arXiv 2022

Show all 186 references
  1. [6]

    Czakon, A

    M. Czakon, A. Mitov and R. Poncelet,Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order Study of Three-Jet Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 152001 [2106.05331]

    2021 arXiv

  2. [7]

    X. Chen, P. Jakubčík, M. Marcoli and G. Stagnitto,Jet production at electron-positron colliders at next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,Phys. Lett. B869(2025) 139804 [2505.10618]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [8]

    Gehrmann-De Ridder, T

    A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and G. Heinrich,NNLO corrections to event shapes in e+ e- annihilation,JHEP12(2007) 094 [0711.4711]

    2007 arXiv

  4. [9]

    Weinzierl,NNLO corrections to 3-jet observables in electron-positron annihilation,Phys

    S. Weinzierl,NNLO corrections to 3-jet observables in electron-positron annihilation,Phys. Rev. Lett.101(2008) 162001 [0807.3241]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [10]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, A. Kardos, G. Somogyi, Z. Szőr, Z. Trócsányi et al.,Jet production in the CoLoRFulNNLO method: event shapes in electron-positron collisions,Phys. Rev. D 94(2016) 074019 [1606.03453]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [11]

    Catani, Y.L

    S. Catani, Y.L. Dokshitzer, M. Olsson, G. Turnock and B.R. Webber,New clustering algorithm for multi - jet cross-sections in e+ e- annihilation,Phys. Lett. B269(1991) 432

    1991

  7. [12]

    Farhi,A QCD Test for Jets,Phys

    E. Farhi,A QCD Test for Jets,Phys. Rev. Lett.39(1977) 1587

    1977

  8. [13]

    Catani, G

    S. Catani, G. Turnock and B.R. Webber,Jet broadening measures ine+e− annihilation, Phys. Lett. B295(1992) 269

    1992

  9. [14]

    Stewart, F.J

    I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and W.J. Waalewijn,N-Jettiness: An Inclusive Event Shape to Veto Jets,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 092002 [1004.2489]

    2010 arXiv

  10. [16]

    R.-J. Fu, R. Rahn, D.Y. Shao, W.J. Waalewijn and B. Wu,qT-slicing with multiple jets, 2412.05358

  11. [17]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman,Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production,Nucl. Phys. B250(1985) 199

    1985

  12. [18]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Drell-Yan Production at SmallqT, Transverse Parton Distributions and the Collinear Anomaly,Eur. Phys. J. C71(2011) 1665 [1007.4005]

    2011 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,Factorization and NNLL Resummation for Higgs Production with a Jet Veto,JHEP07(2012) 108 [1205.3806]

    2012 arXiv

  14. [20]

    Bozzi, S

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini,Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC,Nucl. Phys. B737(2006) 73 [hep-ph/0508068]

    2006 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini,Universality of nonleading logarithmic contributions in transverse momentum distributions,Nucl. Phys. B596(2001) 299 [hep-ph/0008184]

    2001 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Bozzi, S

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini,Production of Drell-Yan lepton pairs in hadron collisions: Transverse-momentum resummation at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy,Phys. Lett. B696(2011) 207 [1007.2351]. – 68 –

    2011 arXiv

  17. [23]

    de Florian, G

    D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and D. Tommasini,Higgs boson production at the LHC: transverse momentum resummation effects in theH→γγ,H→WW→ℓνℓνand H→ZZ→4ℓdecay modes,JHEP06(2012) 132 [1203.6321]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Stewart, F.J

    I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann, J.R. Walsh and S. Zuberi,JetpT resummation in Higgs production atNNLL′ +NNLO,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 054001 [1307.1808]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Jouttenus, I.W

    T.T. Jouttenus, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann and W.J. Waalewijn,Jet mass spectra in Higgs boson plus one jet at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic order,Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 054031 [1302.0846]

    2013 arXiv

  20. [26]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss, Y. Li, D. Neill et al.,Precise QCD Description of the Higgs Boson Transverse Momentum Spectrum,Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 425 [1805.00736]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [27]

    Bizon, P.F

    W. Bizon, P.F. Monni, E. Re, L. Rottoli and P. Torrielli,Momentum-space resummation for transverse observables and the Higgs p⊥ at N3LL+NNLO,JHEP02(2018) 108 [1705.09127]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Bizoń, X

    W. Bizoń, X. Chen, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss et al., Fiducial distributions in Higgs and Drell-Yan production at N3LL+NNLO,JHEP12(2018) 132 [1805.05916]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Bizon, A

    W. Bizon, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss, P.F. Monni et al., The transverse momentum spectrum of weak gauge bosons at N3LL + NNLO,Eur. Phys. J. C79(2019) 868 [1905.05171]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Alioli, A

    S. Alioli, A. Broggio, A. Gavardi, S. Kallweit, M.A. Lim, R. Nagar et al.,Resummed predictions for hadronic Higgs boson decays,JHEP04(2021) 254 [2009.13533]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [31]

    Becher and T

    T. Becher and T. Neumann,FiducialqT resummation of color-singlet processes at N3LL+NNLO,JHEP03(2021) 199 [2009.11437]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [32]

    Camarda, G

    S. Camarda, G. Ferrera and M. Schott,Determination of the strong-coupling constant from the Z-boson transverse-momentum distribution,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 39 [2203.05394]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Billis, B

    G. Billis, B. Dehnadi, M.A. Ebert, J.K.L. Michel and F.J. Tackmann,Higgs pT Spectrum and Total Cross Section with Fiducial Cuts at Third Resummed and Fixed Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 072001 [2102.08039]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Ju and M

    W.-L. Ju and M. Schönherr,The qT and∆ϕspectra in W and Z production at the LHC at N3LL’+N2LO,JHEP10(2021) 088 [2106.11260]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [35]

    E. Re, L. Rottoli and P. Torrielli,Fiducial Higgs and Drell-Yan distributions at N3LL′+NNLO with RadISH,JHEP2109(2021) 108 [2104.07509]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [36]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss, P.F. Monni, E. Re et al.,Third-Order Fiducial Predictions for Drell-Yan Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 252001 [2203.01565]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [37]

    Neumann and J

    T. Neumann and J. Campbell,Fiducial Drell-Yan production at the LHC improved by transverse-momentum resummation at N4LLp+N3LO,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) L011506 [2207.07056]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Campbell, R.K

    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, T. Neumann and S. Seth,Jet-veto resummation at N3LLp + NNLO in boson production processes,JHEP04(2023) 106 [2301.11768]. – 69 –

    2023 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Camarda, L

    S. Camarda, L. Cieri and G. Ferrera,Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT resummation at N4LL accuracy,Phys. Lett. B845(2023) 138125 [2303.12781]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [40]

    V. Moos, I. Scimemi, A. Vladimirov and P. Zurita,Extraction of unpolarized transverse momentum distributions from the fit of Drell-Yan data at N4LL,JHEP05(2024) 036 [2305.07473]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Alioli, G

    S. Alioli, G. Bell, G. Billis, A. Broggio, B. Dehnadi, M.A. Lim et al.,N3LL resummation of one-jettiness for Z-boson plus jet production at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 094009 [2312.06496]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Piloneta and A

    S. Piloneta and A. Vladimirov,Angular distributions of Drell-Yan leptons in the TMD factorization approach,JHEP12(2024) 059 [2407.06277]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Billis, J.K.L

    G. Billis, J.K.L. Michel and F.J. Tackmann,Drell-Yan transverse-momentum spectra at N3LL′ and approximate N4LL with SCETlib,JHEP02(2025) 170 [2411.16004]

    2025 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,An NNLO subtraction formalism in hadron collisions and its application to Higgs boson production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 222002 [hep-ph/0703012]

    2007 arXiv

  39. [45]

    Grazzini,NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the H —>WW —>lnu lnu and H —>ZZ —>4l decay channels,JHEP02(2008) 043 [0801.3232]

    M. Grazzini,NNLO predictions for the Higgs boson signal in the H —>WW —>lnu lnu and H —>ZZ —>4l decay channels,JHEP02(2008) 043 [0801.3232]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, G. Ferrera, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini,Vector boson production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,Phys. Rev. Lett.103(2009) 082001 [0903.2120]

    2009 arXiv

  41. [47]

    Ferrera, M

    G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and F. Tramontano,Associated WH production at hadron colliders: a fully exclusive QCD calculation at NNLO,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 152003 [1107.1164]

    2011 arXiv

  42. [48]

    Ferrera, M

    G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and F. Tramontano,Associated ZH production at hadron colliders: the fully differential NNLO QCD calculation,Phys. Lett. B740(2015) 51 [1407.4747]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Ferrera, G

    G. Ferrera, G. Somogyi and F. Tramontano,Associated production of a Higgs boson decaying into bottom quarks at the LHC in full NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B780(2018) 346 [1705.10304]

    2018 arXiv

  44. [50]

    de Florian, M

    D. de Florian, M. Grazzini, C. Hanga, S. Kallweit, J.M. Lindert, P. Maierhöfer et al., Differential Higgs Boson Pair Production at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in QCD,JHEP 09(2016) 151 [1606.09519]

    2016 arXiv

  45. [51]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera and M. Grazzini,Diphoton production at hadron colliders: a fully-differential QCD calculation at NNLO,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 072001 [1110.2375]

    2012 arXiv

  46. [52]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and A. Torre,Zγproduction at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B731(2014) 204 [1309.7000]

    2014 arXiv

  47. [53]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and D. Rathlev,WγandZγproduction at the LHC in NNLO QCD,JHEP07(2015) 085 [1504.01330]

    2015 arXiv

  48. [54]

    Cascioli, T

    F. Cascioli, T. Gehrmann, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, P. Maierhöfer, A. von Manteuffel et al., ZZ production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B735(2014) 311 [1405.2219]. – 70 –

    2014 arXiv

  49. [55]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and D. Rathlev,ZZ production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 407 [1507.06257]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [56]

    Gehrmann, M

    T. Gehrmann, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, P. Maierhöfer, A. von Manteuffel, S. Pozzorini et al.,W +W− Production at Hadron Colliders in Next to Next to Leading Order QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 212001 [1408.5243]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [57]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, S. Pozzorini, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,W+W− production at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,JHEP08(2016) 140 [1605.02716]

    2016 arXiv

  52. [58]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,W±Zproduction at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,Phys. Lett. B761(2016) 179 [1604.08576]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [59]

    Grazzini, S

    M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, D. Rathlev and M. Wiesemann,W±Zproduction at the LHC: fiducial cross sections and distributions in NNLO QCD,JHEP05(2017) 139 [1703.09065]

    2017 arXiv

  54. [60]

    Campbell, R.K

    J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, Y. Li and C. Williams,Predictions for diphoton production at the LHC through NNLO in QCD,JHEP07(2016) 148 [1603.02663]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [61]

    Heinrich, S

    G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner and J. Pires,NNLO predictions for Z-boson pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2018) 142 [1710.06294]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [62]

    Campbell, T

    J.M. Campbell, T. Neumann and C. Williams,ZγProduction at NNLO Including Anomalous Couplings,JHEP11(2017) 150 [1708.02925]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [63]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. de Florian, G. Ferrera and M. Grazzini,Diphoton production at the LHC: a QCD study up to NNLO,JHEP04(2018) 142 [1802.02095]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [64]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli and H. Sargsyan,Top-quark pair hadroproduction at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 051501 [1901.04005]

    2019 arXiv

  59. [65]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and J. Mazzitelli,Bottom-quark production at hadron colliders: fully differential predictions in NNLO QCD,JHEP03(2021) 029 [2010.11906]

    2021 arXiv

  60. [66]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit and J. Mazzitelli,Top-quark pair production at the LHC: Fully differential QCD predictions at NNLO,JHEP07(2019) 100 [1906.06535]

    2019 arXiv

  61. [67]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli and C. Savoini,Higgs Boson Production in Association with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair in Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111902 [2210.07846]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [68]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli and C. Savoini,Associated production of a W boson and massive bottom quarks at next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 074032 [2212.04954]

    2023 arXiv

  63. [69]

    Buonocore, S

    L. Buonocore, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini, S. Kallweit, J. Mazzitelli, L. Rottoli et al.,Precise Predictions for the Associated Production of a W Boson with a Top-Antitop Quark Pair at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 231901 [2306.16311]

    2023 arXiv

  64. [70]

    Cieri, X

    L. Cieri, X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and A. Huss,Higgs boson production at the LHC using theqT subtraction formalism at N3LO QCD,JHEP02(2019) 096 [1807.11501]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Camarda, L

    S. Camarda, L. Cieri and G. Ferrera,Drell–Yan lepton-pair production: qT resummation at – 71 – N3LL accuracy and fiducial cross sections at N3LO,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L111503 [2103.04974]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [72]

    X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, N. Glover, A. Huss, T.-Z. Yang and H.X. Zhu,Transverse mass distribution and charge asymmetry in W boson production to third order in QCD,Phys. Lett. B840(2023) 137876 [2205.11426]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [73]

    Gaunt, M

    J. Gaunt, M. Stahlhofen, F.J. Tackmann and J.R. Walsh,N-jettiness Subtractions for NNLO QCD Calculations,JHEP09(2015) 058 [1505.04794]

    2015 arXiv

  68. [74]

    Boughezal, J.M

    R. Boughezal, J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu et al.,Color singlet production at NNLO in MCFM,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 7 [1605.08011]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [75]

    Boughezal, C

    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, X. Liu and F. Petriello,W-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD,Phys. Rev. Lett.115(2015) 062002 [1504.02131]

    2015 arXiv

  70. [76]

    Boughezal, C

    R. Boughezal, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu and F. Petriello,Higgs boson production in association with a jet at NNLO using jettiness subtraction,Phys. Lett. B748(2015) 5 [1505.03893]

    2015 arXiv

  71. [77]

    Boughezal, J.M

    R. Boughezal, J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, C. Focke, W.T. Giele, X. Liu et al.,Z-boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett.116(2016) 152001 [1512.01291]

    2016 arXiv

  72. [78]

    Boughezal, X

    R. Boughezal, X. Liu and F. Petriello,W-boson plus jet differential distributions at NNLO in QCD,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 113009 [1602.06965]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [79]

    Beneke and V.A

    M. Beneke and V.A. Smirnov,Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B522(1998) 321 [hep-ph/9711391]

    1998 arXiv

  74. [80]

    Smirnov,Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,Springer Tracts Mod

    V.A. Smirnov,Applied asymptotic expansions in momenta and masses,Springer Tracts Mod. Phys.177(2002) 1

    2002

  75. [81]

    Bauer, S

    C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart,An Effective field theory for collinear and soft gluons: Heavy to light decays,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 114020 [hep-ph/0011336]

    2001 arXiv

  76. [82]

    Bauer, D

    C.W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I.W. Stewart,Soft collinear factorization in effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 054022 [hep-ph/0109045]

    2002 arXiv

  77. [83]

    Dasgupta and G.P

    M. Dasgupta and G.P. Salam,Accounting for coherence in interjet E(t) flow: A Case study, JHEP03(2002) 017 [hep-ph/0203009]

    2002 arXiv

  78. [84]

    Dasgupta and G.P

    M. Dasgupta and G.P. Salam,Resummed event-shape variables in dis,Journal of High Energy Physics2002(2002) 032–032

    2002

  79. [85]

    Banfi, G.P

    A. Banfi, G.P. Salam and G. Zanderighi,Principles of general final-state resummation and automated implementation,JHEP03(2005) 073 [hep-ph/0407286]

    2005 arXiv

  80. [87]

    Makris, F

    Y. Makris, F. Ringer and W.J. Waalewijn,Joint thrust and TMD resummation in electron-positron and electron-proton collisions,JHEP02(2021) 070 [2009.11871]

    2021 arXiv

  81. [88]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,Infrared factorization of tree level QCD amplitudes at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond,Nucl. Phys. B570(2000) 287 [hep-ph/9908523]

    2000 arXiv

  82. [89]

    Berends and W.T

    F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele,Recursive Calculations for Processes with n Gluons,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 759. – 72 –

    1988

  83. [90]

    Mangano and S.J

    M.L. Mangano and S.J. Parke,Multiparton amplitudes in gauge theories,Phys. Rept.200 (1991) 301 [hep-th/0509223]

    1991 arXiv

  84. [91]

    Feige and M.D

    I. Feige and M.D. Schwartz,An on-shell approach to factorization,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 065021 [1306.6341]

    2013 arXiv

  85. [92]

    Feige and M.D

    I. Feige and M.D. Schwartz,Hard-Soft-Collinear Factorization to All Orders,Phys. Rev. D 90(2014) 105020 [1403.6472]

    2014 arXiv

  86. [93]

    Kosower,All order collinear behavior in gauge theories,Nucl

    D.A. Kosower,All order collinear behavior in gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B552(1999) 319 [hep-ph/9901201]

    1999 arXiv

  87. [94]

    Campbell and E.W.N

    J.M. Campbell and E.W.N. Glover,Double unresolved approximations to multiparton scattering amplitudes,Nucl. Phys. B527(1998) 264 [hep-ph/9710255]

    1998 arXiv

  88. [95]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,Collinear factorization and splitting functions for next-to-next-to-leading order QCD calculations,Phys. Lett. B446(1999) 143 [hep-ph/9810389]

    1999 arXiv

  89. [96]

    Z. Bern, G. Chalmers, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,One loop N gluon amplitudes with maximal helicity violation via collinear limits,Phys. Rev. Lett.72(1994) 2134 [hep-ph/9312333]

    1994 arXiv

  90. [97]

    Bern, L.J

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower,One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits,Nucl. Phys. B425(1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226]

    1994 arXiv

  91. [98]

    Bern and G

    Z. Bern and G. Chalmers,Factorization in one loop gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 465 [hep-ph/9503236]

    1995 arXiv

  92. [99]

    Z. Bern, V. Del Duca and C.R. Schmidt,The Infrared behavior of one loop gluon amplitudes at next-to-next-to-leading order,Phys. Lett. B445(1998) 168 [hep-ph/9810409]

    1998 arXiv

  93. [100]

    Z. Bern, V. Del Duca, W.B. Kilgore and C.R. Schmidt,The infrared behavior of one loop QCD amplitudes at next-to-next-to leading order,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 116001 [hep-ph/9903516]

    1999 arXiv

  94. [101]

    Kosower and P

    D.A. Kosower and P. Uwer,One loop splitting amplitudes in gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B 563(1999) 477 [hep-ph/9903515]

    1999 arXiv

  95. [102]

    Del Duca, A

    V. Del Duca, A. Frizzo and F. Maltoni,Factorization of tree QCD amplitudes in the high-energy limit and in the collinear limit,Nucl. Phys. B568(2000) 211 [hep-ph/9909464]

    2000 arXiv

  96. [103]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian and G. Rodrigo,The Triple collinear limit of one loop QCD amplitudes,Phys. Lett. B586(2004) 323 [hep-ph/0312067]

    2004 arXiv

  97. [104]

    Badger and E.W.N

    S.D. Badger and E.W.N. Glover,Two loop splitting functions in QCD,JHEP07(2004) 040 [hep-ph/0405236]

    2004 arXiv

  98. [105]

    Bern, L.J

    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower,Two-loop g —>gg splitting amplitudes in QCD, JHEP08(2004) 012 [hep-ph/0404293]

    2004 arXiv

  99. [106]

    Sborlini, D

    G.F.R. Sborlini, D. de Florian and G. Rodrigo,Double collinear splitting amplitudes at next-to-leading order,JHEP01(2014) 018 [1310.6841]

    2014 arXiv

  100. [107]

    Sborlini, D

    G.F.R. Sborlini, D. de Florian and G. Rodrigo,Triple collinear splitting functions at NLO for scattering processes with photons,JHEP10(2014) 161 [1408.4821]

    2014 arXiv

  101. [108]

    Badger, F

    S. Badger, F. Buciuni and T. Peraro,One-loop triple collinear splitting amplitudes in QCD, JHEP09(2015) 188 [1507.05070]. – 73 –

    2015 arXiv

  102. [109]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, R. Haindl, A. Lazopoulos and M. Michel,Tree-level splitting amplitudes for a quark into four collinear partons,JHEP02(2020) 189 [1912.06425]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [110]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, R. Haindl, A. Lazopoulos and M. Michel,Tree-level splitting amplitudes for a gluon into four collinear partons,JHEP10(2020) 093 [2007.05345]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [111]

    Czakon and S

    M. Czakon and S. Sapeta,Complete collection of one-loop triple-collinear splitting operators for dimensionally-regulated QCD,JHEP07(2022) 052 [2204.11801]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [112]

    X. Guan, F. Herzog, Y. Ma, B. Mistlberger and A. Suresh,Splitting amplitudes at N3LO in QCD,JHEP01(2025) 090 [2408.03019]

    2025 arXiv

  106. [113]

    Agarwal, L

    N. Agarwal, L. Magnea, C. Signorile-Signorile and A. Tripathi,The infrared structure of perturbative gauge theories,Phys. Rept.994(2023) 1 [2112.07099]

    2023 arXiv

  107. [114]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. de Florian and G. Rodrigo,Space-like (versus time-like) collinear limits in QCD: Is factorization violated?,JHEP07(2012) 026 [1112.4405]

    2012 arXiv

  108. [115]

    Berends and W.T

    F.A. Berends and W.T. Giele,Multiple Soft Gluon Radiation in Parton Processes,Nucl. Phys. B313(1989) 595

    1989

  109. [116]

    Ma,Identifying regions in wide-angle scattering via graph-theoretical approaches,JHEP 09(2024) 197 [2312.14012]

    Y. Ma,Identifying regions in wide-angle scattering via graph-theoretical approaches,JHEP 09(2024) 197 [2312.14012]

    2024 arXiv

  110. [117]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,The soft gluon current at one loop order,Nucl. Phys. B591 (2000) 435 [hep-ph/0007142]

    2000 arXiv

  111. [118]

    Anastasiou, C

    C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat and B. Mistlberger,Soft triple-real radiation for Higgs production at N3LO,JHEP07(2013) 003 [1302.4379]

    2013 arXiv

  112. [119]

    Duhr and T

    C. Duhr and T. Gehrmann,The two-loop soft current in dimensional regularization,Phys. Lett. B727(2013) 452 [1309.4393]

    2013 arXiv

  113. [120]

    Li and H.X

    Y. Li and H.X. Zhu,Single soft gluon emission at two loops,JHEP11(2013) 080 [1309.4391]

    2013 arXiv

  114. [121]

    Catani, D

    S. Catani, D. Colferai and A. Torrini,Triple (and quadruple) soft-gluon radiation in QCD hard scattering,JHEP01(2020) 118 [1908.01616]

    2020 arXiv

  115. [122]

    Zhu,Double soft current at one-loop in QCD,2009.08919

    Y.J. Zhu,Double soft current at one-loop in QCD,2009.08919

    2009

  116. [123]

    Catani and L

    S. Catani and L. Cieri,Multiple soft radiation at one-loop order and the emission of a soft quark–antiquark pair,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 97 [2108.13309]

    2022 arXiv

  117. [124]

    Catani, L

    S. Catani, L. Cieri, D. Colferai and F. Coradeschi,Soft gluon–quark–antiquark emission in QCD hard scattering,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 38 [2210.09397]

    2023 arXiv

  118. [125]

    Czakon, F

    M. Czakon, F. Eschment and T. Schellenberger,Revisiting the double-soft asymptotics of one-loop amplitudes in massless QCD,JHEP04(2023) 065 [2211.06465]

    2023 arXiv

  119. [126]

    Del Duca, C

    V. Del Duca, C. Duhr, R. Haindl and Z. Liu,Tree-level soft emission of a quark pair in association with a gluon,JHEP01(2023) 040 [2206.01584]

    2023 arXiv

  120. [127]

    Herzog, Y

    F. Herzog, Y. Ma, B. Mistlberger and A. Suresh,Single-soft emissions for amplitudes with two colored particles at three loops,JHEP12(2023) 023 [2309.07884]

    2023 arXiv

  121. [128]

    Chen, M.-x

    W. Chen, M.-x. Luo, T.-Z. Yang and H.X. Zhu,Soft theorem to three loops in QCD andN = 4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2024) 131 [2309.03832]

    2024 arXiv

  122. [129]

    Chen and Z

    X. Chen and Z. Liu,Tree-level soft emission for two pairs of quarks,JHEP02(2025) 166 [2411.08795]. – 74 –

    2025 arXiv

  123. [130]

    Catani and M.H

    S. Catani and M.H. Seymour,A General algorithm for calculating jet cross-sections in NLO QCD,Nucl. Phys. B485(1997) 291 [hep-ph/9605323]

    1997 arXiv

  124. [131]

    Becher, A

    T. Becher, A. Broggio and A. Ferroglia,Introduction to Soft-Collinear Effective Theory, vol. 896, Springer (2015), 10.1007/978-3-319-14848-9, [1410.1892]

    2015 arXiv

  125. [132]

    Collins, D.E

    J.C. Collins, D.E. Soper and G.F. Sterman,Factorization of Hard Processes in QCD,Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys.5(1989) 1 [hep-ph/0409313]

    1989 arXiv

  126. [133]

    Bauer, S

    C.W. Bauer, S. Fleming, D. Pirjol, I.Z. Rothstein and I.W. Stewart,Hard scattering factorization from effective field theory,Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 014017 [hep-ph/0202088]

    2002 arXiv

  127. [134]

    Cieri, P.K

    L. Cieri, P.K. Dhani and G. Rodrigo,Catani’s generalization of collinear factorization breaking,2402.14749

  128. [135]

    Rothstein and I.W

    I.Z. Rothstein and I.W. Stewart,An Effective Field Theory for Forward Scattering and Factorization Violation,JHEP08(2016) 025 [1601.04695]

    2016 arXiv

  129. [136]

    Forshaw, A

    J.R. Forshaw, A. Kyrieleis and M.H. Seymour,Super-leading logarithms in non-global observables in QCD,JHEP08(2006) 059 [hep-ph/0604094]

    2006 arXiv

  130. [137]

    Becher, P

    T. Becher, P. Hager, S. Jaskiewicz, M. Neubert and D. Schwienbacher,Factorization Restoration through Glauber Gluons,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 061901 [2408.10308]

    2025 arXiv

  131. [138]

    Bonocore, E

    D. Bonocore, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, S. Melville, L. Vernazza and C.D. White,A factorization approach to next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms,JHEP06(2015) 008 [1503.05156]

    2015 arXiv

  132. [139]

    Bonocore, E

    D. Bonocore, E. Laenen, L. Magnea, L. Vernazza and C.D. White,Non-abelian factorisation for next-to-leading-power threshold logarithms,JHEP12(2016) 121 [1610.06842]

    2016 arXiv

  133. [140]

    Magnea, E

    L. Magnea, E. Maina, G. Pelliccioli, C. Signorile-Signorile, P. Torrielli and S. Uccirati, Factorisation and Subtraction beyond NLO,JHEP12(2018) 062 [1809.05444]

    2018 arXiv

  134. [141]

    Beneke, A

    M. Beneke, A. Broggio, S. Jaskiewicz and L. Vernazza,Threshold factorization of the Drell-Yan process at next-to-leading power,JHEP07(2020) 078 [1912.01585]

    2020 arXiv

  135. [142]

    Liu and M

    Z.L. Liu and M. Neubert,Two-Loop Radiative Jet Function for ExclusiveB-Meson and Higgs Decays,JHEP06(2020) 060 [2003.03393]

    2020 arXiv

  136. [143]

    Z.L. Liu, M. Neubert, M. Schnubel and X. Wang,Radiative quark jet function with an external gluon,JHEP02(2022) 075 [2112.00018]

    2022 arXiv

  137. [144]

    Catani and P.K

    S. Catani and P.K. Dhani,Collinear functions for QCD resummations,JHEP03(2023) 200 [2208.05840]

    2023 arXiv

  138. [145]

    Bauer, A.V

    C.W. Bauer, A.V. Manohar and P.F. Monni,Disentangling observable dependence in SCETI and SCETII anomalous dimensions: angularities at two loops,JHEP07(2021) 214 [2012.09213]

    2021 arXiv

  139. [146]

    Collins and F.V

    J.C. Collins and F.V. Tkachov,Breakdown of dimensional regularization in the Sudakov problem,Phys. Lett. B294(1992) 403 [hep-ph/9208209]

    1992 arXiv

  140. [147]

    Beneke,Helmholtz International Summer School on Heavy Quark Physics, Dubna, 2005

    M. Beneke,Helmholtz International Summer School on Heavy Quark Physics, Dubna, 2005

    2005

  141. [148]

    Manohar and I.W

    A.V. Manohar and I.W. Stewart,The zero-bin and mode factorization in quantum field theory,Physical Review D76(2007)

    2007

  142. [149]

    Collins,Rapidity divergences and valid definitions of parton densities,PoSLC2008 (2008) 028 [0808.2665]

    J. Collins,Rapidity divergences and valid definitions of parton densities,PoSLC2008 (2008) 028 [0808.2665]. – 75 –

    2008 arXiv

  143. [150]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill and I.Z. Rothstein,The Rapidity Renormalization Group,Phys. Rev. Lett.108(2012) 151601 [1104.0881]

    2012 arXiv

  144. [151]

    J.-Y. Chiu, A. Jain, D. Neill and I.Z. Rothstein,A Formalism for the Systematic Treatment of Rapidity Logarithms in Quantum Field Theory,JHEP05(2012) 084 [1202.0814]

    2012 arXiv

  145. [152]

    Vladimirov,Structure of rapidity divergences in multi-parton scattering soft factors, JHEP04(2018) 045 [1707.07606]

    A. Vladimirov,Structure of rapidity divergences in multi-parton scattering soft factors, JHEP04(2018) 045 [1707.07606]

    2018 arXiv

  146. [153]

    Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nuclear Physics B463(1996) 99–157

    I. Balitsky,Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,Nuclear Physics B463(1996) 99–157

    1996

  147. [154]

    Jalilian-Marian, A

    J. Jalilian-Marian, A. Kovner, A. Leonidov and H. Weigert,Wilson renormalization group for lowxphysics: Towards the high density regime,Physical Review D59(1998)

    1998

  148. [155]

    Kovchegov,Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,Phys

    Y.V. Kovchegov,Small x F(2) structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 034008 [hep-ph/9901281]

    1999 arXiv

  149. [156]

    Ji, J.-p

    X.-d. Ji, J.-p. Ma and F. Yuan,QCD factorization for semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering at low transverse momentum,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 034005 [hep-ph/0404183]

    2005 arXiv

  150. [157]

    Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD, vol

    J. Collins,Foundations of perturbative QCD, vol. 32, Cambridge University Press (11, 2013)

    2013

  151. [158]

    J.-y. Chiu, A. Fuhrer, A.H. Hoang, R. Kelley and A.V. Manohar,Soft-collinear factorization and zero-bin subtractions,Physical Review D79(2009)

    2009

  152. [159]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann,Factorization of heavy-to-light form factors in soft-collinear effective theory,Nuclear Physics B685(2004) 249–296

    2004

  153. [160]

    J.-y. Chiu, F. Golf, R. Kelley and A.V. Manohar,Electroweak sudakov corrections using effective field theory,Physical Review Letters100(2008)

    2008

  154. [161]

    Becher and G

    T. Becher and G. Bell,Analytic regularization in soft-collinear effective theory,Physics Letters B713(2012) 41–46

    2012

  155. [162]

    Y. Li, D. Neill and H.X. Zhu,An exponential regulator for rapidity divergences,Nucl. Phys. B960(2020) 115193 [1604.00392]

    2020 arXiv

  156. [163]

    Ebert, I

    M.A. Ebert, I. Moult, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann, G. Vita and H.X. Zhu,Subleading power rapidity divergences and power corrections for qT,JHEP04(2019) 123 [1812.08189]

    2019 arXiv

  157. [164]

    Vita,QCD Beyond Leading Power, Ph.D

    G. Vita,QCD Beyond Leading Power, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 9, 2020.2008.10606

    2020

  158. [165]

    Catani, M

    S. Catani, M. Grazzini and A. Torre,Transverse-momentum resummation for heavy-quark hadroproduction,Nucl. Phys. B890(2014) 518 [1408.4564]

    2014 arXiv

  159. [166]

    Catani, S

    S. Catani, S. Devoto, M. Grazzini and J. Mazzitelli,Soft-parton contributions to heavy-quark production at low transverse momentum,JHEP04(2023) 144 [2301.11786]

    2023 arXiv

  160. [167]

    Gatheral,Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys

    J.G.M. Gatheral,Exponentiation of Eikonal Cross-sections in Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Lett. B133(1983) 90

    1983

  161. [168]

    Frenkel and J.C

    J. Frenkel and J.C. Taylor,NONABELIAN EIKONAL EXPONENTIATION,Nucl. Phys. B246(1984) 231

    1984

  162. [169]

    Catani, Y.L

    S. Catani, Y.L. Dokshitzer, M.H. Seymour and B.R. Webber,Longitudinally invariantKt clustering algorithms for hadron hadron collisions,Nucl. Phys. B406(1993) 187

    1993

  163. [170]

    Ellis and D.E

    S.D. Ellis and D.E. Soper,Successive combination jet algorithm for hadron collisions,Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 3160 [hep-ph/9305266]. – 76 –

    1993 arXiv

  164. [172]

    Bertolini, D

    D. Bertolini, D. Kolodrubetz, D. Neill, P. Pietrulewicz, I.W. Stewart, F.J. Tackmann et al., Soft Functions for Generic Jet Algorithms and Observables at Hadron Colliders,JHEP07 (2017) 099 [1704.08262]

    2017 arXiv

  165. [173]

    In preparation

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, F. Guadagni, J. Haag, S. Kallweit and L. Rottoli, “In preparation.”

  166. [174]

    Buonocore, M

    L. Buonocore, M. Grazzini, F. Guadagni, J. Haag and L. Rottoli,The Quark Jet Function fork T-like Variables in NNLO QCD,2508.19226

    arXiv

  167. [175]

    Catani and M

    S. Catani and M. Grazzini,QCD transverse-momentum resummation in gluon fusion processes,Nucl. Phys. B845(2011) 297 [1011.3918]

    2011 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,Phys

    S. Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,Phys. Lett. B427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439]

    1998 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Sterman and M.E

    G.F. Sterman and M.E. Tejeda-Yeomans,Multiloop amplitudes and resummation,Phys. Lett. B552(2003) 48 [hep-ph/0210130]

    2003 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Becher and M

    T. Becher and M. Neubert,On the Structure of Infrared Singularities of Gauge-Theory Amplitudes,JHEP06(2009) 081 [0903.1126]

    2009 arXiv

  171. [179]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea,Factorization constraints for soft anomalous dimensions in QCD scattering amplitudes,JHEP03(2009) 079 [0901.1091]

    2009 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Gardi and L

    E. Gardi and L. Magnea,Infrared singularities in QCD amplitudes,Nuovo Cim. C32N5-6 (2009) 137 [0908.3273]

    2009 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi,Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language,Nucl. Phys. B126 (1977) 298

    1977

  174. [182]

    Gribov and L.N

    V.N. Gribov and L.N. Lipatov,Deep inelastic e p scattering in perturbation theory,Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.15(1972) 438

    1972

  175. [183]

    − t2 12,3 s12s123 + 4z3 + (z1−z 2)2 z1 +z 2 + (1−2ϵ) z1 +z 2− s12 s123 # (A.7) – 78 – D ˆP (id) q→¯q1q2q3 E =C F CF− 1 2CA (1−ϵ) 2s23 s12 −ϵ + s123 s12

    Y.L. Dokshitzer,Calculation of the Structure Functions for Deep Inelastic Scattering and e+ e- Annihilation by Perturbation Theory in Quantum Chromodynamics.,Sov. Phys. JETP46(1977) 641. A Splitting kernels In the initial-state collinear limit, we use the regularized and spin-...

    1977

  176. [184]

    Write the observable in terms of scalar products of the momentaki andp F

  177. [185]

    Express all collinear momenta through the hard momenta{pi}={p 1,p 2,...,p nJ+2}, pF and homogeneously scaling variables as kµ 1j = z1j z1 pµ 1 +k µ t,1j + z1|kt,1j|2 z1jQ2 pµ 2 kµ 2j = z2j z2 pµ 2 +k µ t,2j + z2|kt,2j|2 z2jQ2 pµ 1 kµ ij =z ijpµ i +k µ ⊥,ij + Q2|k⊥,ij|2 4zij (p...

  178. [186]

    Rescale the momenta with their respective scaling dimensions, kt,ij→λ akt,ij k⊥,ij→λ bkt,ij kSj→λ ckSj, (D.3) 15Typically, we can rewritepF asq− P iki, which allows us to eliminate the scalar products of QCD momenta with color singlet momenta. In some complicated cases, if the...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.